key: cord-0970387-qdi6x2vz authors: Behesht Aeen, Fatemeh; Pakzad, Reza; Goudarzi Rad, Mohammad; Abdi, Fatemeh; Zaheri, Farzaneh; Mirzadeh, Narges title: Effect of prone position on respiratory parameters, intubation and death rate in COVID-19 patients: systematic review and meta-analysis date: 2021-07-13 journal: Sci Rep DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93739-y sha: 708f9d688dba1f3b2555785bbb9eda7ec6bea5d5 doc_id: 970387 cord_uid: qdi6x2vz Prone position (PP) is known to improve oxygenation and reduce mortality in COVID-19 patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effects of PP on respiratory parameters and outcomes. PubMed, EMBASE, ProQuest, SCOPUS, Web of Sciences, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar were searched up to 1st January 2021. Twenty-eight studies were included. The Cochran's Q-test and I(2) statistic were assessed heterogeneity, the random-effects model was estimated the pooled mean difference (PMD), and a meta-regression method has utilized the factors affecting heterogeneity between studies. PMD with 95% confidence interval (CI) of PaO(2)/FIO(2) Ratio in before–after design, quasi-experimental design and in overall was 55.74, 56.38, and 56.20 mmHg. These values for Spo(2) (Sao(2)) were 3.38, 17.03, and 7.58. PP in COVID-19 patients lead to significantly decrease of the Paco(2) (PMD: − 8.69; 95% CI − 14.69 to − 2.69 mmHg) but significantly increase the PaO(2) (PMD: 37.74; 95% CI 7.16–68.33 mmHg). PP has no significant effect on the respiratory rate. Based on meta-regression, the study design has a significant effect on the heterogeneity of Spo(2) (Sao(2)) (Coefficient: 12.80; p < 0.001). No significant associations were observed for other respiratory parameters with sample size and study design. The pooled estimate for death rate and intubation rates were 19.03 (8.19–32.61) and 30.68 (21.39–40.75). The prone positioning was associated with improved oxygenation parameters and reduced mortality and intubation rate in COVID-19 related respiratory failure. In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for designing and implementing systematic review studies, the following steps were taken: a systematic literature search, organization of documents for the review, abstracting and quality assessment of each study, synthesizing data, and writing the report 21 . The protocol of the study was registered in the International Prospective Register Of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) at the National Institute For Health Research. Registration number in PROSPERO is CRD42021257619. Search strategy. According to the PICO framework, the systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, ProQuest, SCOPUS, Web of Sciences, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar databases. MeSH Keywords were connected with AND, OR and NOT prone position and respiratory parameters, and their suggested entry terms were the main keywords in the search strategy. www.nature.com/scientificreports/ five categories: qualitative, randomized controlled trial, nonrandomized, quantitative descriptive, and mixed methods studies 22 . This tool consists of five items for each category, each of which could be marked as Yes, No, or cannot tell. Based on the scoring system, score one is assigned to Yes and score 0 to all other answers. In other words, the total score would be the percentage of affirmative responses. To evaluate the final scores qualitatively, the scores above half (more than 50%) were considered high quality. Data extraction. Data , in the before-after design, we calculated the change score MD (mean after prone position minus mean before prone position), and in Quasi-Experimental design, we calculated MD (mean in supine position minus mean in prone position). Then Standard deviation in Before-After design and Quasi-Experimental design was calculated based on formulas (1) and (2): where SD before , SD after , and Corr is the standard deviation in before prone position, standard deviation after prone position, and correlation coefficient between before and after where SD prone position , SD supine position , n 1 , and n 2 is the standard deviation in prone position group, the standard deviation in supine position group, the sample size in the prone position and supine position groups. Then pooled MD (PMD) was calculated by the "Metan" command 23, 24 . Heterogeneity was determined using Cochran's Q test of heterogeneity, and the I 2 index was used to quantify heterogeneity. In accordance with the Higgins classification approach, I 2 values above 0.7 were considered as high heterogeneity. To estimate the PMD for respiratory parameters and subgroup analysis (study design and ventilation), the fixed-effect model was used, and when the heterogeneity was greater than 0.7, the random-effects model was used. The meta-regression analysis was used to examine the effect of study design, sample size, BMI, age and prone position (PP) duration as factors affecting heterogeneity among studies. The "Meta bias" command was used to check for publication bias, and if there was any publication bias, the PMD was adjusted with the "Metatrim" command using the trim-and-fill method. In all analyses, a significance level of 0.05 was considered. Overall, 1970 studies were found through databases. After excluding redundant papers, 855 studies remained. After reading abstracts, 775 studies were excluded from the list. Then, the full text of the remaining 80 studies was reviewed, and 52 studies were excluded. Finally, 28 studies included in qualitative analysis and 26 studies with a total sample size of 1272 participants were included in the quantitative analysis. The flowchart of this selection process is shown in Fig. 1 . Studies were published during 2020-2021, most studies were done in the UK, China, and Spain with three studies and range participants age were 17-83 years old (Tables 1 and 2 ). Supplementary 2 shows risk of bias assessment for included studies. All studies were high quality (more than 50% scores). Pooled mean difference of respiratory parameters in total and based on subgroups. Figure 2 showed the forest plot for MD of PaO 2 /FIO 2 Ratio in included studies. Figure 3 and Table 3 showed the PMD of other respiratory parameters in included studies. The PMD of SPO 2 (Sao 2 ) in the study with before-after design, quasi-experimental design, and in total was 3.38 (95% CI 1.68-5.09), 17.03 (95% CI 12.19-21.88), and 7.58 (95% CI 4.93-10.23); respectively. This means that the prone position in COVID-19 patients leads to significant improvement corresponding to Spo 2 (Sao 2 ). Also the PMD of Paco 2 in COVID-19 patients was significantly decreased in quasi-experimental design (PMD: − 18.49; 95% CI − 34.50 to − 2.47 mmHg) and in total (PMD: − 8.69; 95% CI − 14.69 to − 2.69 mmHg). No significant change was observed for PMD of PaCo 2 in the before-after design. The PMD of other respiratory parameters showed in Table 3 and 4) . Figure 5 showed PMD of respiratory parameters based on ventilation status. PMD of Spo 2 (Sao 2 ) in Intubation and Non-intubation subgroup was 10.56 (95% CI − 18.15 to 39.26) and 8.57 (95% CI 3.47-13.67); respectively. This means that the prone position in COVID-19 patients with non-intubation leads to significant improvement corresponding to Spo 2 (Sao 2 ) but Intubation have no effects on Spo 2 (Sao 2 ) improvement. Also PMD of PaO 2 /FIO 2 in Intubation and non-intubation subgroup was 65.03 (95% CI 6.06-123.99) and 49.56 (95% CI 26.56-72.56); respectively. This means that the prone position in COVID-19 patients leads to significant improvement of PaO 2 /FIO 2 Ratio, but this value for Intubated patients was higher than non-intubated groups. Situation of other parameter was showed in Fig. 5 Heterogeneity and meta-regression results. According to Cochran's Q test of heterogeneity, there was significant heterogeneity among studies (p < 0.001). Except for PaCo 2 in the before-after design, the heterogeneity amount was more than 85% based on the I 2 index, which indicates high heterogeneity. Table 4 presents the results of the univariate meta-regression; there are significant associations between study, results with study design corresponding to SPO 2 (Sao 2 ) percent (Coefficient: 12.80; p < 0.001). No significant associations were observed for other respiratory parameters with sample size, study design, BMI, age and PP duration (Table 4 ). This systematic review analyzed the effects of prone position on respiratory parameters, intubation, and death rate. We found that prone position initiation leads to improved oxygenation parameters (PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio, SpO 2 , PaO 2 , and PaCO 2 ) in patients with mild to severe respiratory failure due to confirmed COVID-19. However, the prone position did not change the respiratory rate in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure suffering from COVID-19. Most of the studies (18/28 studies) demonstrated significant improvement in PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio after prone positioning. Moreover, the improvement of SpO 2 (SaO 2 ) and PaO 2 has been shown in 15 and 7 studies, respectively. Although the effect of prone position after resupination has declined in five studies 1, 5, 8, 16, 29 , early prone positioning should be considered as first-line therapy in ARDS patients 43 . Initiation of prone position in ARDS patients by reducing shunt, and V/Q mismatch, brings about an increase in the recruitment of non-aerated areas of the lungs, secretion clearance, improvement work of breathing (WOB) and oxygenation, and reduction of mortality compared with the supine position [44] [45] [46] . Prone position by enhancement in PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio not only leads to a decrease in the classification of respiratory failure but also prevents further complications due to ARDS, such as multi-organ failure (MOF), which is the most common cause of mortality in this devastating condition 47 . The efficacy of prone positioning may be affected by various protocols, such as different settings (ICU or emergency department), the timing of initiation (early or late), duration (prolonged or short sessions), positioning (prone position with or without lateral position), respiratory support in intubated or non-intubated patients (mechanical ventilation, NIV, nasal cannula, helmet, face mask) and the severity of ARDS 48 . Even though in this study PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio was significantly higher in the prone-positioning group with mild to severe ARDS, a further meta-analysis need to assess the impact of prone position in a different classification of ARDS with mild condition. In this systematic review, the prone position time varied from less than 1 to 16 h in a day. In eight studies, the prone positioning has been implemented for about 16 h a day. The prolonged prone positioning (no less than 10-12 h and ideally for 16-20 h) leads to improved oxygenation and a significant reduction in mortality in patients with severe ARDS. On the other hand, reducing the number of turning in patients with critical conditions can decrease the risk of more complications 48 . Although PaCO 2 did not demonstrate a difference in five studies 5, 16, 25, 29, 40 , the PMD of PaCO 2 in COVID-19 patients significantly decreased totally. The prone position by increasing the dorsal recruitment, PaCO2 clearance, and decreasing the dead space can also lead to better ventilation. Moreover, a higher PaCO 2 clearance due to the prone position is related to a significant decrease in 54 . In terms of respiratory rate, in few studies, the respiratory rate reduction was significant, but we found that respiratory rate did not change during the prone positioning in the overall analysis. Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that prone positioning leads to a lower mortality rate in confirmed COVID-19 patients. Although in this systematic review and meta-analysis, many studies have assessed the impact of prone position on the short term (28 days) mortality, where they benefit from prone positioning protocols, the effect of prone positioning in the long-term (3 months or more) mortality is unclear. Therefore, further studies will be needed to demonstrate the relationship between prone positioning in COVID-19 patients and long-term mortality. Furthermore, this study confirmed that the improvement of oxygenation parameters due to the prone position might be associated with a lower intubation rate in COVID-19 patients. In our systematic review of 28 studies, prone positioning has been compared with supine positioning in hypoxic adult patients with COVID-19. We found prone position by optimizing lung recruitment, and the V/Q mismatch can improve oxygenation parameters such as PaO 2 /FIO 2 Ratio, Spo 2 (Sao 2 ), PaO 2 , PaCO 2 . Nevertheless, the prone position did not change their respiratory rate. Moreover, the initiation of prone position might be associated with a lower mortality and intubation rate. Since most patients demonstrated improved oxygenation and lower mortality and intubation rate, we recommend the prone position in patients COVID-19.Similar to other studies, our research had some limitations. (1) Some studies did not report values of the respiratory parameters in different groups and just reported significantly parameter (like that p-value); which we have to exclude this studies from the quantitative analysis that this limitation was not be resolved even by data requesting from corresponding authors. We would like to perform the gender-specific estimation, but it was not possible due to insufficient data in the primary studies; (2) also we tend to estimate the pooled MD in different geographical regions or country-specific estimation based on available methods 50 , since the infrequent studies number, this estimation will not be robust. Table 3 . Result of meta-analysis for calculation of pooled mean difference of respiratory parameters; publication bias and fill and trim method. CI confidence interval, N number of study, PMD pooled mean difference, Pao 2 partial pressure of oxygen, FIO 2 fractional inspiratory oxygen, Sao 2 oxygen saturation (arterial blood), RR respiratory rate. Figure 6 . Association between sample size with mean difference (MD) of PaO 2 /FIO 2 Ratio (mmHg) (A) and Spo 2 (Sao 2 ) (B) using meta-regression. Size of the circles indicates sample magnitude. There was no significant association between sample size with MD of PaO 2 /FIO 2 Ratio and Spo 2 (Sao 2 ). Prolonged prone position ventilation for SARS-CoV-2 patients is feasible and effective Is cesarean section a safe delivery method to prevent mother to child transmission of SARS-CoV-2? Coronavirus and male infertility: Letter to the editor Efficacy of early prone or lateral positioning in patients with severe COVID-19: a single-center prospective cohort Feasibility and physiological effects of prone positioning in non-intubated patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19 (PRON-COVID): A prospective cohort study Prone position in management of COVID-19 patients; a commentary Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 vertical transmission using the amniotic fluid test Effects of prone ventilation on oxygenation, inflammation, and lung infiltrates in COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome: A retrospective cohort study Awake prone positioning in COVID-19 hypoxemic respiratory failure: Exploratory findings in a single-center retrospective cohort study Awake prone positioning in COVID-19 Prone positioning in moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19: a cohort study and analysis of physiology Evaluation of oxygenation in 129 proning sessions in 34 mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients Reinventing the wheel in ARDS: Awake proning in COVID-19 Prone position after liberation from prolonged mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 respiratory failure Prone position effects in the treatment of COVID-19 patients Prone positioning for patients intubated for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) secondary to COVID-19: A retrospective observational cohort study Short-term outcomes of 50 patients with acute respiratory distress by COVID-19 where prone positioning was used outside the ICU Critically ill patients with COVID-19: A narrative review on prone position Early awake prone and lateral position in non-intubated severe and critical patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan: A respective cohort study Prone position of patients with COVID-19 and acute respiratory distress syndrome preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and mata-analysis: The PRISMA statement The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers COVID-19 associated central nervous system manifestations, mental and neurological symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis Global and regional prevalence of strabismus: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis Hypoxemia and prone position in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients: A prospective cohort study. Can Awake prone positioning does not reduce the risk of intubation in COVID-19 treated with high-flow nasal oxygen therapy: A multicenter, adjusted cohort study Early self-proning in awake, non-intubated patients in the emergency department: A single ED's experience during the COVID-19 pandemic Use of prone positioning in nonintubated patients with COVID-19 and hypoxemic acute respiratory failure Prone and lateral positioning in spontaneously breathing patients with COVID-19 pneumonia undergoing noninvasive helmet CPAP treatment Evaluation of PEEP and prone positioning in early COVID-19 ARDS Prone positioning in awake non-ICU patients with ARDS caused by COVID-19 Respiratory parameters in patients with COVID-19 after using noninvasive ventilation in the prone position outside the intensive care unit Prone positioning in awake, nonintubated patients with COVID-19 hypoxemic respiratory failure Prone positioning in high-flow nasal cannula for COVID-19 patients with severe hypoxemia: a pilot study Early conscious prone positioning in patients with COVID-19 receiving continuous positive airway pressure: A retrospective analysis Prone position in COVID-19: Can we tackle rising dead space? Prone positioning on non-intubated COVID 19 patients in hypoxic respiratory distress: Single site retrospective health records review Conscious prone positioning during non-invasive ventilation in COVID-19 patients: Experience from a single centre The POSITIONED study: Prone positioning in nonventilated coronavirus disease 2019 patients-A retrospective analysis Transport of awake hypoxemic probable COVID 19 patients in the prone position Tolerability and safety of awake prone positioning COVID-19 patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure. Can Efficacy of early prone position for COVID-19 patients with severe hypoxia: a single-center prospective cohort study Mechanisms of the effects of prone positioning in acute respiratory distress syndrome A comprehensive review of prone position in ARDS Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome Treatment of ARDS with prone positioning Using the prone position for ventilated patients with respiratory failure: A review Prone ventilation for adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome Prone Positioning in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Global and regional prevalence of age-related cataract: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis Arterial blood gases Blood gas analysis for bedside diagnosis Pulse oximetry training manual. (World Health Organization SpO 2 / FiO 2 ratio as an oxygenation parameter in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome The importance of respiratory rate monitoring: From healthcare to sport and exercise We appreciate the reviewers comment. This study has no funding. The authors declare no competing interests. The online version contains supplementary material available at https:// doi. org/ 10. 1038/ s41598-021-93739-y.Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to F.A. Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/.