key: cord-0967861-yzn6jibu authors: Walsh, Kieran A.; Jordan, Karen; Clyne, Barbara; Rohde, Daniela; Drummond, Linda; Byrne, Paula; Ahern, Susan; Carty, Paul G.; O'Brien, Kirsty K.; O'Murchu, Eamon; O'Neill, Michelle; Smith, Susan M.; Ryan, Máirín; Harrington, Patricia title: SARS-CoV-2 Detection, Viral Load and Infectivity over the Course of an Infection: SARS-CoV-2 Detection, Viral Load and Infectivity date: 2020-06-29 journal: J Infect DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.06.067 sha: 5ee643b9429a57b6dd06f9d99917b23f569b4264 doc_id: 967861 cord_uid: yzn6jibu OBJECTIVES: To summarise the evidence on the detection pattern and viral load of SARS-CoV-2 over the course of an infection (including any asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic phase), and the duration of infectivity. METHODS: A systematic literature search was undertaken in PubMed, Europe PubMed Central and EMBASE from 30 December 2019 to 12 May 2020. RESULTS: We identified 113 studies conducted in 17 countries. The evidence from upper respiratory tract samples suggests that the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 peaks around symptom onset or a few days thereafter, and becomes undetectable about two weeks after symptom onset; however, viral loads from sputum samples may be higher, peak later and persist for longer. There is evidence of prolonged virus detection in stool samples, with unclear clinical significance. No study was found that definitively measured the duration of infectivity; however, patients may not be infectious for the entire duration of virus detection, as the presence of viral ribonucleic acid may not represent transmissible live virus. CONCLUSION: There is a relatively consistent trajectory of SARS-CoV-2 viral load over the course of COVID-19 from respiratory tract samples, however the duration of infectivity remains uncertain. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID- 19) pandemic is a public health emergency of international concern causing a substantial number of cases and deaths globally. (1, 2) COVID- 19 presents an unprecedented challenge to governments worldwide due to the transmissibility of the virus, the scale of its impact on morbidity and mortality, the uncertainty regarding the development of long-term immunity in those infected, the current lack of vaccine or treatment options, and the impact on healthcare systems, economies and society. (3, 4) Much remains unknown about COVID-19; however, evidence is emerging at a fast pace. (5) Our team at the Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA) of Ireland has conducted a series of rapid reviews on various public health topics relating to COVID-19. The rapid reviews arose directly from questions posed by policy makers and expert clinicians supporting the Irish National Public Health Emergency Team (NPHET). Hence, the findings of these reviews have informed the national response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Ireland, (6) and have implications for international health policy as well as clinical and public health guidance. Understanding the trajectory of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and the duration of infectivity is of critical importance to controlling the pandemic. (7) As SARS-CoV-2 is a novel virus in the human population, there is substantial uncertainty regarding virological levels (i.e. detection and viral load) in patients and how this relates to infectivity and disease severity. Information relating to SARS-CoV-2 detection and viral load at different time points of an infection, including in those without any symptoms, will aid with the clinical interpretation of real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) test results. Furthermore, information pertaining to the duration of infectivity will help inform public health protocols for quarantine, isolation and contact tracing. We defined detection as the presence (i.e. detectability) or absence (i.e. undetectability) of the virus in a sample at a given time. We defined viral load as the quantity (or titre) of virus in a volume of fluid at a given time. For this current article, we summarise the available evidence to address the following two research questions: 1. What is the detection pattern and viral load of SARS-CoV-2 over the course of an infection (including any asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic phase)? Patients who remain symptomless throughout the duration of disease are referred to as 'asymptomatic', and those who are in the early stages of disease, after transmission has occurred, but in whom symptoms have not yet developed are referred to as 'presymptomatic'. (8) 2. What is the duration of infectivity of SARS-CoV-2? Duration of infectivity is defined as the time interval during which an infectious agent may be transferred from an infected person to another person. (8) We conducted rapid reviews for a broad range of public health topics related to COVID-19 following a standardised protocol, (8) in keeping with Cochrane rapid review methodology guidance. (9) Initially, we conducted a systematic literature search of electronic databases detection and infectivity. Only articles including human subjects were included. No language restrictions were applied. The last update for this rapid review was conducted on 12 May 2020. The protocol, which is available online, contains the detailed search strategies. (8) All potentially eligible papers, including non-peer-reviewed pre-prints, were exported to Endnote X8.2 and screened for relevance. Any study (regardless of design) that addressed the research question and met the inclusion criteria ( (10) and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized studies of Interventions tool (ROBINS-I)). (11) For study designs where no universally accepted quality appraisal tool existed (e.g. case series, modelling studies), a de-novo tool, adapted from related tools, was used. (8) The findings of the research question were synthesised narratively due to the heterogeneity of study designs and data. A total of 113 studies were included (Table 2 and Appendix Table 1 ). Seventy-four studies were conducted in China. (12, 14-21, 26-28, 32, 35, 36, 39, 40, 52, 53, 56, 57, 59-62, 64, 66, 68, 70-72, 76-78, 80, 82, 84, 85, 89-94, 96, 97, 99-111, 113-125) Five studies each were conducted in Taiwan (22-24, 49, 58) and the United States (US). (13, 34, 44, 74, 75) Four studies each were conducted in Singapore (31, 42, 95, 112) and Italy, (46, 65, 67, 79) three studies each were conducted in Germany, (25, 41, 98) France (30, 45, 50) and Vietnam, (47, 48, 83) two studies each were conducted in Hong Kong, (87, 88) the United Kingdom (UK) (33, 54) and South Korea, (43, 55) with one study conducted in each of the following: Bangladesh, (38) Switzerland, (51) Thailand, (69) Japan, (73) Australia, (86) and Canada. (63) One hundred-and-eleven studies were observational in nature, (12-15, 17-29, 31-80, 82-125) one study was a randomised controlled trial (RCT) (16) and one was a non-randomised controlled trial (NRCT). (30) The majority of included observational studies (n=95) were case reports or series. (12, 14, 15, 17-22, 24-29, 31, 33, 34, 36-39, 42-44, 47-70, 72-76, 78-80, 82-86, 88-90, 93-102, 104-119, 121, 123-125) The sample size of included studies ranged from one patient (26 case reports) (18, 24, 26, 31, 33, 34, 38, 39, 42, 47, 49, 55, 58, 61, 63, 65, 67, 70, 72-75, 83, 86, 94, 108) to 3,712 patients, (41) with a median sample size across all studies of 15 patients. Fifty studies reported the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 over the course of the infection using rRT-PCR testing. (13, 16, 20, 22, 25, 30-34, 37, 41-46, 48, 50, 51, 55, 58, 59, 61, 63, 64, 66, 68, 74, 76, 77, 79, 82, 83, 86-88, 90, 98, 102, 104, 106, 108, 112-114, 118, 120, 124, 125) In general, the highest viral loads from upper respiratory tract samples were observed at the time of symptom onset and for a few days after (generally within one week), with levels slowly decreasing over the next one to three weeks. Some studies have observed clear differences between the viral loads detected in upper respiratory tract and stool specimens. In general, viral loads from upper respiratory tract samples were observed to peak within a week of symptom onset and followed a relatively consistent downward trajectory, whereas viral loads from stool samples were found to peak later in the disease (generally two to three weeks after symptom onset) (120) and followed a more erratic pattern (Table 2) . (21, 39, 42, 43, 53, 58, 60, 65, 80, 83-85, 91, 96, 98, 102, 106, 111, 116, 118-120) Eight studies reported that viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) from sputum samples peaked at a later stage (generally two weeks after symptom onset) (58, 74, 91, 120) and contained higher viral loads than upper respiratory tract samples. (21, 58, 66, 113) Data on the differences in viral load dynamics between different upper respiratory sample sites are inconsistent, with some studies reporting higher viral loads in nasal samples, (124) and others reporting higher viral loads in throat samples. (113) Nine studies reported an association between higher viral loads and more severe symptoms. (50, 59, 66, 77, 87, 113, 114, 120, 125) One of these studies (n=76 patients) found that the mean viral load of severe cases was around 60 times higher than that of mild cases (using nasopharyngeal samples), and this relationship was maintained from early to later stages of the infection. (59) Although another study (n=23 patients) found higher viral loads (about 10 times higher) in those with severe disease (using posterior oropharyngeal saliva or endotracheal aspirate) compared with mild disease, this relationship was not found to be statistically significant. (87) Seven studies observed increases in viral loads prior to clinical deterioration (particularly those based on lower respiratory tract specimens) with decreases in viral load observed prior to improvement of symptoms. (43, 66, 98, 113, 114, 120, 125) One of these studies analysed sputum samples from 92 patients collected at hospital admission, and found a significant positive association between higher sputum viral load at baseline and risk of disease progression. (114) Seven studies measured viral load in pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic patients, and generally found little to no difference in viral load between pre-symptomatic, asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. (13, 25, 30, 42, 46, 48, 90) A study was conducted in the municipality of Vo in Italy, where rRT-PCR testing was undertaken in 85.9% (n=2,812) and 71.5% (n=2,343) of the total population (n=3,275) at two consecutive time points less than two weeks apart. (46) Of these 48 positive residents, 27 (56%) had no symptoms at the time of testing; 24 of these 27 patients (88%) subsequently developed symptoms (i.e. they were presymptomatic) and 3 (12%) remained asymptomatic. (13) The authors found that the viral loads were similar between asymptomatic, pre-symptomatic and symptomatic patients. Symptomatic patients were sub-divided into those displaying typical symptoms (i.e. fever, cough and shortness of breath) and those displaying atypical symptoms (i.e. chills, malaise, increased confusion, rhinorrhoea/nasal congestion, myalgia, dizziness, headache, nausea, and diarrhoea). The median cycle threshold (Ct) values for asymptomatic residents, presymptomatic residents, residents with atypical symptoms and residents with typical symptoms, were 25.5, 23.1, 24.2, and 24.8, respectively (note that lower Ct values infer higher viral loads. (13) A case report of a 6-month old noted no symptoms on admission to hospital, but a relatively high viral load (nasopharyngeal sample targeting ORF1ab-gene, peak viral load Ct value = 13.73). The viral load decreased over the next nine days, although it raised slightly when the child experienced a fever on day two of admission, before falling again once the fever resolved. (42) Eighty-eight studies reported the duration of virus detection, with the end point being the first day of two consecutive negative tests taken 24 hours apart, using rRT-PCR. (12, 14, 15, 17-19, 21, 22, 24, 26, 27, 29, 30, 32, 33, 35-38, 43-50, 52-63, 65-76, 78, 79, 82, 83, 85-87, 89-94, 96-102, 105-107, 109-112, 115-123, 125) Additionally, two recent studies required three consecutive negative tests taken 24 hours apart prior to establishment of virus clearance. (28, 103) Of these 90 studies, 66 reported the duration of virus detection from onset of symptoms using upper respiratory tract specimens, (12, 14, 15, 17-19, 22, 24, 26, 27, 30, 32, 33, 38, 43, 46-50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60-63, 65-70, 72, 73, 75, 76, 79, 82, 83, 85, 86, 91, 93, 94, 96-101, 106, 107, 110-112, 117-123) and ten reported the duration of virus detection from onset of symptoms using lower respiratory tract specimens. (22, 24, 43, 44, 55, 58, 66, 91, 98, 103) The longest duration observed was 83 days in one patient from upper respiratory tract samples. (52) At the aggregate study-level, the median duration of virus detection from symptom onset using upper respiratory tract samples was 14.5 days (range of study-level medians: 1-53.5 days). (52, 75) In lower respiratory tract samples, the median duration of virus detection from symptom onset at the aggregate study-level was 15.5 days (range of study-level medians: 10-44 days). (58, 66) Four studies reported that viral RNA in lower respiratory tract samples may persist for longer periods than upper respiratory tract samples. (37, 58, 91, 120) Thirty-two studies, reported detectable levels of viral RNA in stool samples for a prolonged period of time (often greater than three to four weeks after symptom onset), (12, 15, 21, 24, 26, 34, 37, 39, 42, 44, 50, 53, 56, 58, 60, 62, 65, 80, 83-85, 91, 96, 98, 99, 102, 106, 111, 116, 118-120) and possibly longer in children. (15, 26, 39, 42, 62, 80, 84, 85, 102, 106, 119) However, there are concerns regarding truncated data for the duration of virus detection in stool samples, as the data appear to reflect the maximum duration of follow-up, rather than the true duration of virus detection. (21, 24, 26, 37, 44, 50, 53, 56, 62, 83, 98, 99, 111, 118, 120) In general, studies that tested blood samples in populations with mild-to-moderate severity disease did not detect viral RNA or reported weakly positive or inconsistent results. (14, 33, 42, 43, 56, 58, 84, 85, 87, 98, 112) Other sample sites such as urine, (14, 21, 24, 27, 33, 34, 42-44, 50, 53, 56, 65-67, 83, 86, 87, 98, 108, 112, 113, 118, 120) conjunctival fluid (50, 65) and semen (65, 67) were used less frequently and produced inconsistent findings. There are inconsistent findings for the association between disease severity (and/or ICU admission), and the duration of virus detection, with studies reporting either a positive association, (12, 15, 19, 21, 27, 28, 36, 50, 59, 76, 113, 120, 125) or no association. (60, 71, 87, 107, 111, 121) There are also inconsistent findings for the association between older age (generally defined as >65 years) and the duration of virus detection, with studies reporting either a positive (12, 15, 35, 50, 100, 107, 120) or no association. (121) Four studies observed that detection of viral RNA in blood samples was associated with severe disease, (20, 25, 44, 50) however, one case report of a patient with severe pneumonia did not detect viral RNA in the blood. (34) Eight studies measured the duration of virus detection in asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic patients (36, 48, 60, 71, 85, 90, 105, 111) with estimates found to vary widely. One study included 24 cases with asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic COVID-19 infections screened from close contacts. (36) The estimated median duration from the first positive test to the first of two consecutive negative tests was 9.5 days (range: 1-21 days). The authors reported that the virus was detected for a longer period of time in those who subsequently developed symptoms (pre-symptomatic: n=5, median 12 days) compared with those who remained asymptomatic (n=19, median 6 days). Of the five pre-symptomatic cases, the earliest positive rRT-PCR test occurred two days before symptom onset (n=1). Two of the five presymptomatic cases had previously tested negative seven and eight days prior to first symptoms, respectively (but after suspected exposure). (36) patients with non-severe, but symptomatic disease (10 days). (111) Other case series reported detection of virus in hospitalised asymptomatic adults ranging from 7 to 23 days (48, 60, 90) . In terms of paediatric cases, a study involving 36 children (age range: 1-16 years) reported 10 cases (28%) who remained asymptomatic for the duration of hospitalisation (ranging from 10 to 20 days) and for a further two weeks of post-discharge quarantine. (71) Though individual rRT-PCR results were not provided for each of these 10 cases, for one of these asymptomatic cases, it took 10 days to become rRT-PCR-negative. (71) In a case series study by Tan et al., one asymptomatic child had detectable virus for 17 days. (85) No study was found that definitively measured the duration of infectivity. Four studies were found that correlated serial rRT-PCR test results with virus cultures. (13, 45, 58, 98) Arons et al. conducted virus culture in 46 of the 48 residents of a nursing facility in the US who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. (13) Positive culture growth was recorded in 31 (67.4%) of these upper respiratory tract samples. Viable virus was isolated from asymptomatic, presymptomatic and symptomatic residents. The lowest viral load (Ct value) for which there was positive culture growth was 34.3. Viable virus was isolated from specimens collected between six days before, to nine days after, the first evidence of typical symptoms. When atypical symptoms are also considered, viable virus was isolated from samples collected six days before to 13 days after first evidence of any symptoms. However, as samples were only collected up to a maximum of 13 days after symptom onset, it is not known if samples collected at later dates would have resulted in positive culture growth. Woelfel et al. found that no infectious isolates were obtained from any sample (n=9 patients) taken after day eight of symptom onset in spite of ongoing high viral loads. The authors suggested that early discharge followed by home isolation could be chosen for patients with less than 10 5 RNA copies per ml of sputum who are beyond day 10 of symptom onset. (98) The detection of infectious isolates was noted to differ by sample site, being readily isolated from throat and lung-derived samples, but not stool samples. This was despite prolonged detection of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in stool samples. (98) A study by La Scola et al. conducted serial rRT-PCR testing and virus culture of 183 nasopharyngeal samples from 155 patients. (45) They found that the virus could not be isolated from samples collected after day eight of symptom onset, in spite of ongoing high viral loads of approximately 10 5 RNA copies/mL of sample. Additionally, they found that positive culture growth decreased progressively according to the viral load. No culture was obtained from samples with Ct values ≥34 targeting the E gene. The authors inferred that patients with Ct values ≥34 were no longer contagious and could be considered suitable for discharge. (45) Liu et al. reported virus isolation in cell cultures from throat swabs collected upon admission, and from all sputum specimens collected within 18 days of symptom onset in a 50-year old woman in Taiwan. SARS-CoV-2 continued to be detectable from sputum samples using rRT-PCR for 62 days from symptom onset. (58) However there is very limited information relating to the virus culture results reported in this study, hence these findings should be interpreted with caution. (58) Five studies that used epidemiological (n=3) or modelling (n=2) approaches to address the duration of infectivity were found. (23, 32, 40, 74, 95) A prospective case-ascertained study found that all 22 secondary cases, identified from 2,761 close contacts of 100 index cases, had their first day of exposure within five days of the index case's symptom onset and up to five days before symptom onset, suggesting high transmissibility near, or even before symptom onset. No contacts were infected when first exposure occurred five days after the index case's symptom onset. (23) A study conducted in Singapore evaluating seven clusters of COVID-19 found that pre-symptomatic transmission likely occurred between 1-3 days before symptom onset in the pre-symptomatic source patient in four of these clusters. (95) An epidemiological investigation of an individual with mild disease in the US, found no onward transmission to 16 close contacts (defined as persons exposed to the case, from one day before diagnosis) including one intimate partner. (74) One modelling study based primarily on epidemiological data estimated that 44% of transmission could occur before first symptoms present (starting from 2.3 days before symptom onset [95% CI, 3.0 to 0.8 days before symptom onset] and reaching its peak at 0.7 days before symptom onset [95% CI, 2.0 days before to 0.2 days after symptom onset]). The authors also estimated that infectivity declines relatively quickly within seven days of symptom onset. (32) A modelling study conducted in Guangzhou, China applied a statistical transmission model to contact-tracing data of 349 lab-confirmed COVID-19 cases in that region. (40) The authors found that a mean incubation period of four days and a maximum infectious period (including the incubation period) of 13 days provided the best fit of the observed data. The model suggested that COVID-19 cases were at least as infectious during their incubation period as from symptom onset. (40) Thirty-six studies included children (18 years or younger) either exclusively, (14, 26, 39, 42, 47, 51, 71, 84, 85, 102, 106, 119) or in combination with adults. (12, 17, 23, 30, 36, 37, 40, 41, 46, 48, 56, 60, 62, 68, 77, 78, 80, 92, 93, 105, 109, 111, 113, 115) No discernible differences with regards to viral load or duration of virus detection were apparent between adults and children. Two included studies compared findings between children and adults, either directly (41) or indirectly (through reference to published findings). (51) L'Huillier et al. conducted rRT-PCR testing and virus culture in 23 symptomatic children (age range, 7 days -15.9 years). (51) The median viral load at time of diagnosis was 3 x 10 6 copies/ml (IQR 6.9 x 10 3 -4.4 x 10 8 copies/ml), which the authors comment, is comparable to peak viral load levels typically reported in adults in the literature. Virus isolation was successful in 12/23 (52%) of the children. The youngest patient that SARS-CoV-2 was successfully isolated from was a seven-day old neonate. The authors concluded that infectious virus isolation success was largely comparable to that of adults, and two samples yielded an isolate at a lower viral load (1.2 x 10 4 and 1.4 x 10 5 copies/ml) than is typically reported in adults in the literature. (51) Another study by Jones et al. analysed viral loads from 3,712 patients (of all ages) with confirmed COVID-19 identified from routine testing at a laboratory testing centre in Germany. (41) The authors found no significant differences in viral load across age groups, although the relative sample size of children aged ten years or younger (n=49, 1.3%) was small compared with older age groups. (41) There has been criticism of the statistical analysis undertaken in the study by Jones at al., (126) with a secondary re-analysis of these data suggesting there is moderate, but not overwhelming evidence for increasing viral load with increasing age based on a test for trend. The commentator also points to the unbalanced sample sizes between children and adults, and suggests that the study is inconclusive. (126) Hence, caution is warranted when interpreting the findings by Jones et al. (41) Overall, the studies were of low-to-moderate quality. Given that the majority of the included studies (n=95 studies, 84.1%) comprised case series and case reports, the findings should be viewed with caution and will require confirmation using larger more robust study designs. There are also concerns relating to the pre-print status of 17 studies (15%), which had not been peer-reviewed at time of writing. (12, 28, 37, 40, 41, 46, 51, 75, 79, 83, 89, 91, 92, 94, 109, 115, 118) As the majority of included studies (n=74 studies, 65.5%) were conducted in China, the findings may not be generalisable to other populations given differences in demographics and healthcare practices. Furthermore, given the volume of studies published from China, particularly those comprising single case reports and small case series at the early stages of the pandemic, there is a strong possibility of overlapping data with later publications of larger studies. The evidence to date suggest that the viral load in respiratory tract samples peaks around symptom onset and decreases within one to three weeks. Although the duration of detection and the size of the viral load differs between patients, viral RNA generally becomes undetectable (from upper respiratory tract specimens) about two weeks after symptom onset (median 14.5 days). For lower respiratory tract samples, there is conflicting evidence regarding the timing of peak viral loads and duration of virus detection, with some evidence suggesting that the peak occurs later and the duration of detection is longer compared with upper respiratory tract samples (median 15.5 days). (37, 74, 113, 120) However, it is unclear whether the lower respiratory tract findings are influenced by the fact that not all COVID-19 patients experience productive coughs (particularly those without symptoms), (127) and hence certain patients are unable to have their lower respiratory tract sampled (without induction which is not recommended for safety reasons). (128) Viral shedding in stool samples is prolonged and sometimes erratic. The relationship between SARS-CoV-2 detection, viral load and infectivity is not fully understood, as the presence of viral RNA may not represent transmissible live virus. There is evidence that COVID-19 patients are infectious from one to three days before symptom onset, although viable virus has been successfully isolated from upper respiratory tract samples up to six days before onset of symptoms. (13) Two separate epidemiological investigations concluded that there was high transmissibility near, and even before symptom onset. (23, 95) Furthermore, no statistically significant difference in the viral load between symptomatic and asymptomatic patient samples was found in two included studies. (13, 46) The evidence regarding pre-symptomatic and asymptomatic transmission has been reported separately by our research group. (131) Based on the totality of the evidence, it was concluded that pre-symptomatic transmission is likely occurring. A secondary analysis of published data by Casey et al. estimated the proportion of pre-symptomatic transmission to be approximately 56%. (132) Evidence of transmission in asymptomatic patients is, however, more limited (perhaps due to difficulties in identifying truly asymptomatic cases, as it would appear that a large proportion are actually pre-symptomatic). (46) While asymptomatic transmission is plausible, it may not be a driver of overall transmission. (131) Important questions remain regarding the timing and duration of infectivity in asymptomatic patients. In symptomatic patients, there is evidence of a reduction in infectivity 7-10 days after onset of symptoms. Two virus culture studies obtained no infectious isolates from any sample taken eight days after symptom onset in spite of ongoing high viral loads. (45, 98) One of these studies found that patients with Ct values ≥34 were no longer contagious. (45) These findings appear to support early epidemiological and modelling studies, (23, 32, 40) with one study suggesting that transmission may be limited to five days after symptom onset. (23) The findings of this review appear to broadly support the recommendation by the World Health Organization (WHO) to discontinue transmission-based precautions, including isolation, and release a patient from COVID-19 care pathways, if it has been 10 days since symptom onset and the patient has been symptom-free for at least three days (or 10 days after first testing positive if asymptomatic). (133) The duration of infectivity, however, remains uncertain as two recent studies have reported isolation of viable virus from upper and lower respiratory samples 13 days (maximum follow-up) (13) and 18 days (58) respectively after symptom onset. Therefore, clinicians should be careful before discontinuing transmission-based precautions for all COVID-19 patients at 10 days post symptom onset, even if symptom-free for three days. (133) A limited number of studies that compared findings between children and adults report no differences in terms of viral load and duration of virus detection. However, there are concerns regarding the statistical analysis undertaken in the largest of these studies, with re-analysis suggesting a non-significant trend between increasing age and increasing viral load. (41, 126) Even if children have comparable viral loads to adults, (41, 51) the relationship between viral load and infectivity is not well understood as viral load is a proxy measurement of infectivity and may not translate to transmissibility. In our companion rapid review examining the role of children in the transmission of SARS-CoV-2, we concluded that, based on the limited number of studies to-date, children do not appear to contribute substantially to the spread of the virus. (134) Children have generally been under-represented in COVID-19 studies to-date, although this may be a function of testing practices which have typically prioritised those with more severe symptoms, healthcare workers and those residing in long term care settings. Given reports of milder symptoms in children, they would be less likely to be tested and diagnosed. (135) The reduced severity of symptoms as a potential explanation for this under-representation of children in COVID-19 studies appears to be supported by provisional results from the UK Office of National Statistics based on home, self-sampling of nasopharyngeal swabs of over 10,000 individuals. (136) This study found no evidence of differences between age groups in the proportions of those testing positive in the community (excluding infections reported in hospitals, care homes or other institutional settings). This would suggest that symptomatic children are potentially as likely to test positive as other age groups. (136) There is still, however, substantial uncertainty as to how children become infected, how the virus manifests in children and how it transmits from children to others. The early peak of viral load in COVID-19 patients, and the detection of virus in asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic patients underlines the critical importance of ongoing widespread public health and social measures and the rapid detection, diagnosis, isolation and contact tracing of suspected COVID-19 cases. (137) In particular, the evidence suggests that due to the potentially high viral load in the early stages of the infection, often prior to symptom onset, contact tracing should include a period of at least 48 hours prior to symptom onset in the index case. (137, 138) Our review highlights a key virological difference between the current SARS-CoV-2 virus and the SARS-CoV-1 virus that caused severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2002/2003. That is, SARS-CoV-1 viral load peaked later in the disease trajectory (usually seven to 10 days after symptom onset); (139, 140) hence, different public health strategies were more successful in containing this infection. However, recent findings of later viral load peaking and prolonged virus detection from lower respiratory tract samples of SARS-CoV-2, as well as evidence of virus isolation from stool samples, warrants further investigation as these findings may have important public health implications. (37, 120, 129) This review summarises the evidence relating to the detection, viral load and infectivity of (141) Research that combines virological and epidemiological data, using robust study designs and larger patient numbers, is required to determine the true duration of infectivity. The evidence suggests that the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 peaks from upper respiratory tract samples around the time of symptom onset or a few days after, and becomes undetectable within about two weeks. However, some studies report that for lower respiratory tract samples, this peak may occur at a slightly later stage and that the virus may persist for longer. Viral load in stool samples tend to peak at a later stage and follow a more erratic pattern, however the clinical significance of this finding is uncertain. There is some evidence that patients may not be infectious for the entire period that they are SARS-CoV-2 positive and that infectivity may be related to the viral load and time since symptom onset. Further research is required to establish the duration of infectivity of SARS-CoV-2, which is key to informing public health policy in managing the pandemic.  Period of infectiousness/infectivity (defined as the time interval during which SARS-CoV-2 may be transferred directly or indirectly from an infected person to another person). Include:  any study that reports on the viral load or duration of viral detection or infectivity of COVID-19.  studies where COVID-19 was not confirmed with a laboratory test. Key: ARDS -acute respiratory distress syndrome; COVID-19 -coronavirus disease 2019; SARS-CoV-2 -severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; WHO -World Health Organization Key: ETT -Endotracheal tube aspirate; Ct -cycle threshold; IQR -interquartile range; LRT -lower respiratory tract; ND -not detected; NRCT -non-randomized controlled trial; RCTrandomized controlled trial; URT -upper respiratory tract; VL -viral load. * Viral clearance defined as two consecutive negative results with PCR detection at an interval of 24 hours (counting the first day of negative results as the final day) -Not measured by the study authors (site not tested, viral load not measured, or only tested on a single occasion) † Site of sampling not distinguishable in this study An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time World Health Organization declares global emergency: A review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) Covid-19 -Navigating the Uncharted COVID-19 pandemic: perspectives on an unfolding crisis COVID-19: living map of the evidence HIQA publishes COVID-19 evidence summaries to support work of the National Public Health Emergency Team COVID-19: towards controlling of a pandemic Protocol for evidence synthesis support -COVID-19 Interim Guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions Clinical characteristics of the recovered COVID-19 patients with re-detectable positive RNA test Presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections and Transmission in a Skilled Nursing Facility A Case Series of children with 2019 novel coronavirus infection: clinical and epidemiological features COVID-19 in a Designated Infectious Diseases Hospital Outside Hubei Province A Trial of Lopinavir-Ritonavir in Adults Hospitalized with Severe Covid-19 Time Kinetics of Viral Clearance and Resolution of Symptoms in Novel Coronavirus Infection. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine Recurrence of positive SARS-CoV-2 RNA in COVID-19: A case report Clinical progression of patients with COVID-19 in Shanghai Detectable 2019-nCoV viral RNA in blood is a strong indicator for the further clinical severity. Emerging microbes & infections The presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the feces of COVID-19 patients Lopinavir/ritonavir did not shorten the duration of SARS CoV-2 shedding in patients with mild pneumonia in Taiwan Contact Tracing Assessment of COVID-19 Transmission Dynamics in Taiwan and Risk at Different Exposure Periods Before and After Symptom Onset First case of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia in Taiwan SARS-CoV-2 asymptomatic and symptomatic patients and risk for transfusion transmission Anal swab findings in an infant with COVID-19 Comparisons of nucleic acid conversion time of SARS-CoV-2 of different samples in ICU and non-ICU patients Virologic and clinical characteristics for prognosis of severe COVID-19: a retrospective observational study in Wuhan, China. medRxiv The unsynchronized changes of CT image and nucleic acid detection in COVID-19: reports the two cases from Gansu Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial Rapid Progression to Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Review of Current Understanding of Critical Illness from COVID-19 Infection Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19 The index case of SARS-CoV-2 in Scotland: a case report First Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in the United States. The New England journal of medicine Factors associated with negative conversion of viral RNA in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 Clinical characteristics of 24 asymptomatic infections with COVID-19 screened among close contacts in Nanjing, China. Science China Life Sciences Long period dynamics of viral load and antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 infection: an observational cohort study Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected case with viral detection positive in stool but negative in nasopharyngeal samples lasts for 42 days Household Secondary Attack Rate of COVID-19 and Associated Determinants. medRxiv An analysis of SARS-CoV-2 viral load by patient age A Well Infant with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) with High Viral Load Viral Load Kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in First Two Patients in Korea Clinical and virologic characteristics of the first 12 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States Viral RNA load as determined by cell culture as a management tool for discharge of SARS-CoV-2 patients from infectious disease wards Suppression of COVID-19 outbreak in the municipality of The first infant case of COVID-19 acquired from a secondary transmission in Vietnam. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Shedding by Travelers, Vietnam, 2020. Emerging infectious diseases A case of COVID-19 and pneumonia returning from Macau in Taiwan: clinical course and anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG dynamic Clinical and virological data of the first cases of COVID-19 in Europe: a case series. The Lancet Infectious Diseases Shedding of infectious SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic neonates, children and adolescents. medRxiv Prolonged SARS-CoV-2 RNA shedding: Not a rare phenomenon Positive result of Sars-Cov-2 in faeces and sputum from discharged patient with COVID-19 in Yiwu Novel coronavirus disease (Covid-19): The first two patients in the UK with person to person transmission Case of the Index Patient Who Caused Tertiary Transmission of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Korea: the Application of Lopinavir/Ritonavir for the Treatment of COVID-19 Pneumonia Monitored by Quantitative RT-PCR Persistence and clearance of viral RNA in 2019 novel coronavirus disease rehabilitation patients Patients of COVID-19 may benefit from sustained lopinavir-combined regimen and the increase of eosinophil may predict the outcome of COVID-19 progression Prolonged virus shedding even after seroconversion in a patient with COVID-19 Viral dynamics in mild and severe cases of COVID-19. The Lancet Infectious Diseases Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 RNA shedding in clinical specimens and clinical characteristics of 10 patients with COVID-19 in Macau Dynamic change process of target genes by RT-PCR testing of SARS-Cov-2 during the course of a Coronavirus Disease 2019 patient Do children need a longer time to shed SARS-CoV-2 in stool than adults Diagnosis and Management of First Case of COVID-19 in Canada: Lessons applied from SARS Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors improve the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients with hypertension. Emerging microbes & infections Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in a paucisymptomatic patient: epidemiological and clinical challenge in settings with limited community transmission Viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples. The Lancet Infectious Diseases Study of SARS-CoV-2 in semen and urine samples of a volunteer with positive nasopharyngeal swab Unlikely SARS-CoV-2 vertical transmission from mother to child: A case report Clinical Characteristics of Patients Hospitalized with Coronavirus Disease, Thailand. Emerging infectious diseases Duration of SARS-CoV-2 viral shedding during COVID-19 infection. Infectious Diseases Clinical and epidemiological features of 36 children with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Zhejiang, China: an observational cohort study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases Positive result of Sars-Cov-2 in sputum from a cured patient with COVID-19 Gargle lavage as a safe and sensitive alternative to swab samples to diagnose COVID-19: a case report in Japan First Mildly Ill, Non-Hospitalized Case of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Without Viral Transmission in the United States Flight of the COVID-19 patient: experience with aWuhan evacuee-a case report Treatment of 5 Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 with Convalescent Plasma Association of viral load with serum biomakers among COVID-19 cases Clinical and epidemiological features of COVID-19 family clusters in Beijing Mechanism of baricitinib supports artificial intelligence-predicted testing in COVID-19 patients The different clinical characteristics of corona virus disease cases between children and their families in China-the character of children with COVID-19. Emerging Microbes and Infections Validation of predictors of disease severity and outcomes in COVID-19 patients: a descriptive and retrospective study Plasma therapy cured a COVID-19 patient with long duration of viral shedding for 49 days: the clinical features, laboratory tests, plasma therapy and implications for public health management Duration of viral detection in throat and rectum of a patient with COVID-19 Clinical features of children with SARS-CoV-2 infection: an analysis of 13 cases from Changsha, China. Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of 10 children with coronavirus disease 2019 in Changsha Breadth of concomitant immune responses prior to patient recovery: a case report of non-severe COVID-19 Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: an observational cohort study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases Consistent Detection of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in Saliva Analysis of factors affected the SARS-CoV-2 viral shedding time of COVID-19 patients in Anhui, China: a retrospective study Evidence from two cases of asymptomatic infection with SARS-CoV-2: Are 14 days of isolation sufficient? Clinical characteristics of pneumonia patients of long courses infected with SARS-CoV-2 Recurrence of Positive SARS-CoV-2 Viral RNA in Recovered COVID-19 Patients During Medical Isolation Observation The clinical dynamics of 18 cases of COVID-19 outside of Wuhan, China. The European respiratory journal A case report of moderate COVID-19 with an extremely long-term viral shedding period in China Presymptomatic Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 -Singapore Diarrhea is associated with prolonged symptoms and viral carriage in COVID-19. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association A cluster of health care workers with COVID-19 pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2 Virological Assessment of Hospitalized Patients With COVID-2019 Prolonged presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in faecal samples Dynamic profile of RT-PCR findings from 301 COVID-19 patients in Wuhan, China: A descriptive study Post-discharge surveillance and positive virus detection in two medical staff recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Prolonged viral shedding in feces of pediatric patients with coronavirus disease 2019 Factors associated with prolonged viral RNA shedding in patients with COVID-19 Clinical features and dynamics of viral load in imported and non-imported patients with COVID-19 Epidemiological and clinical features of asymptomatic patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection Characteristics of pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection and potential evidence for persistent fecal viral shedding Factors associated with prolonged viral shedding and impact of Lopinavir/Ritonavir treatment in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection Persistent viral RNA positivity during recovery period of a patient with SARS-CoV-2 infection Epidemiological and clinical features of COVID-19 patients with and without pneumonia in Beijing, China Patients with respiratory symptoms are at greater risk of COVID-19 transmission Different longitudinal patterns of nucleic acid and serology testing results based on disease severity of COVID-19 patients. Emerging microbes & infections Epidemiologic Features and Clinical Course of Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 in Singapore Quantitative Detection and Viral Load Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in Infected Patients SARS-CoV-2 viral load in sputum correlates with risk of COVID-19 progression Clinical Characteristics on 25 Discharged Patients with COVID-19 Virus Returning Caution should be exercised for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, especially in the elderly Corticosteroid treatment of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Virus shedding patterns in nasopharyngeal and fecal specimens of COVID-19 patients Detectable SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in feces of three children during recovery period of COVID-19 pneumonia Viral load dynamics and disease severity in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Zhejiang province, China The duration of viral shedding of discharged patients with severe COVID-19. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. The Lancet Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia in Immunosuppressed Renal Transplant Recipients: A Summary of 10 Confirmed Cases in Wuhan, China SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in Upper Respiratory Specimens of Infected Patients Validation of predictors of disease severity and outcomes in COVID-19 patients: a descriptive and retrospective study A discussion and reanalysis of the results Clinical characteristics of 3,062 COVID-19 patients: a meta-analysis American Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (AABIP) statement on the use of bronchoscopy and respiratory specimen collection in patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection Infectious SARS-CoV-2 in Feces of Patient with Severe COVID-19. Emerging Infectious Disease journal Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Fecal Viral Shedding in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Evidence summary for asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19 Presymptomatic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a secondary analysis using published data World Health Organization. Clinical Management of COVID-10 -Interim guidance Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by children: A Rapid Review'. Undergoing peer review Systematic review of COVID-19 in children shows milder cases and a better prognosis than adults Coronavirus (COVID-19) Infection Survey pilot: England World Health Organization. Considerations in the investigation of cases and clusters of COVID-19 COVID-19): National Interim Guidelines for Public Health management of contacts of cases of COVID-19 Evaluation of Advanced Reverse Transcription-PCR Assays and an Alternative PCR Target Region for Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Associated Coronavirus Clinical progression and viral load in a community outbreak of coronavirus-associated SARS pneumonia: a prospective study Inferred duration of infectious period of 1 SARS-CoV-2: rapid review and analysis of available evidence for asymptomatic and symptomatic COVID-19 cases The authors would like to thank Executive Assistant Debra Spillane (HIQA) and Information Specialist Paul Murphy (RCSI), and acknowledge the support of the Health Technology Assessment and Health Information and Standards Directorates at HIQA. This research was funded in part by the Health Research Board under grant no. HRB-CICER-2016-1871.