key: cord-0965937-zuub8m7t authors: Tan, Edina YQ; Albarazi, Dalia; Saw, Young Ern; Buvanaswari, P; Doshi, Kinjal; Liu, Jean CJ title: Confidence in Government and Rumors Amongst Migrant Worker Men Involved in Dormitory Outbreaks of COVID-19: A Cross-sectional Survey date: 2021-10-14 journal: J Migr Health DOI: 10.1016/j.jmh.2021.100069 sha: 6bcb3b40844799bcfec2409c7c6d7f3081b1ce6e doc_id: 965937 cord_uid: zuub8m7t BACKGROUND: : In the COVID-19 pandemic, confidence in the government and access to accurate information have been critical to the control of outbreaks. Although outbreaks have emerged amongst communities of international migrant workers worldwide, little is known about how they perceive the government's response or their exposure to rumors. METHODS: : Between 22 June to 11 October 2020, we surveyed 1011 low-waged migrant workers involved in dormitory outbreaks within Singapore. Participants reported their confidence in the government; whether they had heard, shared, or believed widely-disseminated COVID-19 rumors; and their socio-demographics. Logistic regression models were fitted to identify factors associated with confidence and rumor exposure. RESULTS: : 1 in 2 participants (54.2%, 95% CI: 51.1-57.3%) reported that they believed at least one COVID-19 rumor. This incidence was higher than that observed in the general population for the host country (Singapore). Nonetheless, most participants (90.0%, 95% CI: 87.6-91.5%) reported being confident that the government could control the spread of COVID-19. Age was significantly associated with belief in rumors, while educational level was associated with confidence in government. CONCLUSIONS: : Our findings suggest that language and cultural differences may limit the access that migrant workers have to official COVID-19 updates. Correspondingly, public health agencies should use targeted messaging strategies to promote health knowledge within migrant worker communities. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID- 19) pandemic has underscored how public cooperation is critical for containment strategies. For example, to reduce COVID-19 infection, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention urged the public to wear face masks; undergo physical distancing; reduce travel; pursue vaccination; and subject themselves for testing, isolation and contact tracing [1] . While these measures are effective, successful implementation requires compliance from members of the public [2, 3] . A key aspect of compliance is whether the public trusts the government and has confidence in its COVID-19 response [4] . Across Europe, for example, adherence to health advisories was dampened in regions reporting low trust in policy-makers [5] , or following national incidents where confidence was damaged [6] . When confidence is low, rumors also tend to be shared and believed in place of official communication [7] . For example, Iran experienced a rapid increase in COVID-19 cases during April 2020 [8] . Amidst widespread panic, a rumor was spread that consuming alcohol could prevent COVID-19 infection [8] . Within a month, 728 Iranians died from methanol poisoningan eleven-fold increase from the year before [8] . Together, these accounts underscore the centrality of public trust, and the need to understand: (i) how the community assesses the situation, and (ii) the extent to which they rely on rumors [9] . Although several national surveys have described public confidence and belief in COVID-19 rumors [4, [10] [11] [12] [13] , these have largely involved convenient samples where special populations are under-represented. Of note, we know little about the views of international migrant workersa population of 164 million individuals employed outside their countries of birth [14] . This is a group whose views need to be understood for several reasons. First, a large number of migrant workers are employed in low-waged, manual labour jobs involving high-density work (e.g., factories) or living arrangements (e.g., dormitories that host up to 25,000 residents). As physical distancing is difficult to achieve, several large-scale outbreaks have occurred amongst migrant worker groups in Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, and the Gulf states [15] [16] [17] . Second, migrant workers often face barriers accessing healthcare, information, or resources in their host countries [18] [19] [20] . These may prevent them from receiving official COVID-19 updates, skewing their risk assessments or increasing their reliance on rumors [20] . To address the gap in the literature, we recorded the views of migrant workers in Singapore during the COVID-19 pandemic. The city state is widely considered a "high performing health system" on account of its low case fatality rate (0.05%) and minimal movement restrictions [21] . Surveys of the general population allude to high public confidence in the government, and low rates of sharing or belief in COVID-19 rumors [4, 22, 23] . Despite these statistics, Singapore provides a case study of health inequalities. Of the 64,000 COVID-19 cases reported to date, 9 in 10 have arisen from the 400,000 male migrant workers employed in Singapore"s construction, shipping, and process sectors [17, 24] . One study reported a disease prevalence rate 188 times higher amongst workers living in dormitories (47%) than in the general community (0.25%) [25] , and all workers have been placed under prolonged movement restrictions to contain the spread (April-August 2020: complete dormitory lockdown; August 2020-the present time: gradual resumption of work and limited recreation activities). Against this backdrop, we documented confidence in government and the spread of rumors amongst 1011 migrant workers. Data were taken from the COVID-19 Migrant Health Study, a cross-sectional survey conducted in Singapore between 22 June to 11 October 2020 [26] . Respondents were male migrants employed in manual labour jobs, and were included if they met the following eligibility criteria: aged 21 and above, and holding a government-issued permit indicating their employment status. Surveys were made available in the primary languages spoken by migrant workers (English, Bengali, Tamil, Mandarin), and included both audio recordings and written text to ensure survey access regardless of literacy level. Recruitment took place in-person at: (1) a dormitory complex associated with the largest COVID-19 cluster, (2) transient accommodation for workers relocated from dormitories, (3) construction work sites, and (4) a recreation centre for migrant workers. Additionally, an online survey link was advertised through physical posters and on messaging groups (WhatsApp and Telegram) at: (1) quarantine sites for active COVID-19 cases, and (2) worker dormitories. During the survey period, participants in dormitories lived in shared rooms within complexes that hosted up to 25,000 residents, with multidisciplinary teams providing on-site medical care. For temporary accommodation, participants were roomed individually within residential or hospitality units (e.g., hotels, cruise ships), and had access to off-site medical services upon request. Finally, at quarantine sites, participants stayed in large facilities (e.g., exhibition halls) repurposed to house recovering patients, and had round-the-clock access to on-site medical teams. All participants provided informed consent in accordance with a protocol approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the National University of Singapore and Singapore Health Services (ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04718519). Participants who were recruited in-person received SGD $10 for their time. Following analogous surveys conducted during the Ebola and COVID-19 outbreaks [22, 27] , we measured public confidence with three questions: (1) how confident participants were that the government could control the nationwide spread of COVID-19 (4-point scale ranging from "Not confident at all" (1) to "Very confident" (4)); (2) how fearful they were about their health during the COVID-19 situation (4-point scale ranging from "Not scared at all" (1) to "Very scared" (4)); and (3) how fearful they were about losing their job during this period (4-point scale ranging from "Not scared at all" (1) to "Very scared" (4)). Participants who had not tested positive for COVID-19 were also asked to judge the likelihood that they would be infected (4-point scale ranging from "Not at all likely" (1) to "Very likely" (4)). To assess rumor spread, participants also indicated whether they had heard, believed, or shared each of the following COVID-19 rumors (yes / no): (1) drinking water frequently will help prevent infection (COVID-19 prevention); (2) eating garlic can help prevent infection (COVID-19 prevention); (3) the outbreak arose from people eating bat soup (COVID-19 origins); (4) the virus was created in a US lab to affect China"s economy (COVID-19 origins); and (5) the virus was created in a Chinese lab as a bioweapon (COVID-19 origins). On a global scale, these rumors have been widely disseminated and have been studied in other surveys [23] . To provide further context, we also asked participants to estimate how much time they spent each day: (i) looking for updates about COVID-19 (e.g., searching and reading news, browsing websites, watching videos), and (ii) using social media (e.g., WhatsApp, Facebook, TikTok) to discuss or share information about COVID-19. Finally, we obtained the following sociodemographic data: age, country of origin (Bangladesh, India, Others), marital status (married, not married: single/widowed/separated/divorced), education (primary, secondary, tertiary), years spent in Singapore (≤ 5 years, > 5 years), and history of COVID-19 (tested positive: yes, no). We first summarised public confidence and the spread of rumors (hearing, believing, and sharing rumors) using counts (%) and means. Where comparisons were made with other national surveys, we ran tests for equality of proportions with continuity corrections (for public confidence) or Welch"s t-tests (for rumor spread). Binary logistic models were run to identify socio-demographic predictors of participants": confidence in the government (confident: "very confident" and "somewhat confident"; not confident: "not very confident" and "not confident at all" We Applying binary logistic modelling, we found that education level significantly predicted confidence in government ( 70.5%, 95% CI: 67.6-73.3%) (Figure 1 ). No socio-demographic variable significantly predicted rumor exposure in logistic regression analyses ( Table 2) . [ Belief in COVID-19 rumors was high amongst migrant workers, with 1 in 2 participants (54.2%, 95% CI: 51.1-57.3%) reporting that they believed at least one rumor (mean rumors believed = 1.02, SD = 1.24). Again, the most widely believed rumor was that drinking water was a preventive measure (rate of belief: 40.6%, 95% CI: 37.5-43.7%) ( Figure 1 ). When we applied logistic regression, older participants were more likely to report belief in rumors (AOR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.07; Table 2 ). Namely, for every one-year increase in participants" age, they were 1.05 times more likely to believe in COVID-19 rumors. Finally, few participants (16.4%, 95% CI: 14.2-18.9%) shared COVID-19 rumors with others (mean rumors shared = 0.27, SD = 0.74). Overall rates of rumor-sharing were similar across rumors (range: 3.7% to 7.9%), and no variable emerged as a significant predictor of sharing behavior in logistic regression models ( Figure 1 and Table 2 ). As a context, we compared participants" responses to earlier community surveys that had been conducted within the Singapore resident population [22, 23] [ Figure 1 and Table 2 about here.] In this study, we described for the first time confidence in government and the spread of rumors amongst migrant workers involved in COVID-19 outbreaks. As similar clusters have arisen amongst migrant communities worldwide, this line of work is critical from both a public health and humanitarian standpoint. As our first observation, we found that participants believed and shared more COVID-19 rumors than the general population. This pattern of data may have arisen for several reasons. First, migration scholars have voiced concerns about migration-related barriers (e.g., language, literacy, social barriers) that may limit access to official COVID-19 updates [20] . If access is limited, rumors may then be turned to as a substitute source for information. Alternatively, rumors also tend to be spread during anxiety-provoking situations [28] . Given that migrant workers have faced the brunt of infection clusters and prolonged movement restrictions [25] , it follows that rumors may also be spread within these settings. Future studies are needed to tease apart these accounts. Beyond the quantity of rumors circulated, we also observed that the nature of rumors heard, shared, and believed differed between migrant workers and the resident population. For example, the most widely-heard rumor in our sample was that drinking water prevents infection. This same rumor was the least heard in the resident population, who instead reported high exposure to conspiratorial rumors (e.g., that COVID-19 originated from bat soup, an American lab, or a Chinese lab [23] ). Given differing patterns of rumor exposure, our findings make a strong case that risk communication should be tailored for migrant worker communities. We further identified age as a risk factor for believing COVID-19 rumorsconsistent with other studies that have implicated age in the spread of misinformation [29] . To the extent that age corresponds to lower digital literacy [29] , our finding underscores how increased efforts are needed to reach older workers. Finally, participants in our study reported high confidence in the government. This finding was unexpected, because: (i) previous studies had linked the spread of rumors to low trust in government [30] , (ii) several migrant groups had reported low trust in government following the onset of COVID-19 [31] , (iii) the pandemic had uncovered large disparities between migrant workers and the general population [17] , and (iv) a non-trivial group of participants (40%) expressed fears about their health or about job security. Together, these factors might be expected to dampen participants" confidence. Nonetheless, interviews with migrant workers suggest that participants may have compared their situation to that in other countries [32] . As Singapore"s COVID-19 response is perceived as "high performing" globally [21, 33] , the government may have gained confidence in this manner. Correspondingly, we urge further research to understand the views of migrant workers across different host countries. In reporting these findings, we note several limitations. First, we only captured migrant workers" responses at one time-point. As the COVID-19 situation is fluid, more studies are needed to understand how changing circumstances (e.g., the emergence of new variants, vaccination programs) and activities involving the migrant worker community (e.g., employer engagement, government-level initiatives to provide information) may influence responses. Second, our survey used self-reported measures. Participants" answers may reflect recollection biases or social pressures (e.g., fear of repercussions within a host country), and follow-up research should consider alternate data sources (e.g., by mining social media posts). To conclude, our study provides a rare window into the views of low-waged migrant workers during COVID-19 outbreaks. Despite being confident in the government"s response, participants in our study showed a high reliance on health-related rumors. Our findings inform public health agencies as they seek to address migrant worker communities amidst the pandemic. Declaration of interests ☒ The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. ☐The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: We are grateful to the migrant worker community who hosted us; the surveyors and translators who carried out data collection; hospital, government, and facility staff who granted us research access; and the HealthServe team for feedback during the design phase. Funding: This work was supported by a JY Pillay Global Asia Grant awarded to JCJL and KD (grant IG20-SG002). The funding source had no involvement in the study design; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; nor in the decision to submit the article for publication. Summary of guidance for public health strategies to address high levels of community transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and related deaths Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions Inferring the effectiveness of government interventions against COVID-19 Government trust, perceptions of COVID-19 and behaviour change: cohort surveys Trust and compliance to public health policies in times of COVID-19 The Cummings effect: politics, trust, and behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic Institutional trust and misinformation in the response to the 2018-19 Ebola outbreak in North Kivu, DR Congo: A population-based survey Alcohol intake in an attempt to fight COVID-19: A medical myth in Iran COVID-19 response and mitigation: a call for action Trust in government regarding COVID-19 and its associations with preventive health behaviour and prosocial behaviour during the pandemic: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and nationwide lockdown on trust, attitudes toward government, and well-being Trust in government in Sweden and Denmark during the COVID-19 epidemic. West Eur Politics In press. 14. International Labour Organization. ILO global estimates on international migrant workers; International Labour Organization: Geneva Spatiotemporal dynamics of the COVID-19 pandemic in the State of Kuwait The outbreak of Covid-19 in Malaysia: Pushing migrant workers at the margin Health equity considerations in COVID-19: geospatial network analysis of the COVID-19 outbreak in the migrant population in Singapore The UCL-Lancet commission on migrant and health: The health of a world on the move Occupational health outcomes among international migrant workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis The neglected health of international migrant workers in the COVID-19 epidemic Are high-performing health systems resilient against the COVID-19 epidemic? The relation between official WhatsApp-distributed COVID-19 news exposure and psychological symptoms: Cross-sectional survey study Vulnerability to rumors during the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore Ministry of Manpower Singapore, Measures to contain the COVID-19 outbreak in migrant worker dormitories Mental health of international migrant workers amidst large-scale dormitory outbreaks of COVID-19: A population survey Vaccination hesitancy: fear, trust, and exposure expectancy of an Ebola outbreak Anxiety and rumor Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook Mediating and moderating roles of trust in government in effective risk rumor management: A test case of radiation-contaminated seafood in South Korea Migrant and refugee women in Australia: The safety and security survey