key: cord-0962375-irhizn0b
authors: Milne, Gregory; Hames, Thomas; Scotton, Chris; Gent, Nick; Johnsen, Alexander; Anderson, Roy M; Ward, Tom
title: Does infection with or vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 lead to lasting immunity?
date: 2021-10-21
journal: Lancet Respir Med
DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(21)00407-0
sha: 01e76089a628550f24be8648a54f65f162d8ea25
doc_id: 962375
cord_uid: irhizn0b

Many nations are pursuing the rollout of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines as an exit strategy from unprecedented COVID-19-related restrictions. However, the success of this strategy relies critically on the duration of protective immunity resulting from both natural infection and vaccination. SARS-CoV-2 infection elicits an adaptive immune response against a large breadth of viral epitopes, although the duration of the response varies with age and disease severity. Current evidence from case studies and large observational studies suggests that, consistent with research on other common respiratory viruses, a protective immunological response lasts for approximately 5–12 months from primary infection, with reinfection being more likely given an insufficiently robust primary humoral response. Markers of humoral and cell-mediated immune memory can persist over many months, and might help to mitigate against severe disease upon reinfection. Emerging data, including evidence of breakthrough infections, suggest that vaccine effectiveness might be reduced significantly against emerging variants of concern, and hence secondary vaccines will need to be developed to maintain population-level protective immunity. Nonetheless, other interventions will also be required, with further outbreaks likely to occur due to antigenic drift, selective pressures for novel variants, and global population mobility.

Since its emergence in December 2019, SARS-CoV-2 has continued to cause a considerable burden of acute and chronic disease, placing immense pressure on health systems worldwide. To break chains of transmission and slow the surge in morbidity and mortality associated with the pandemic, governments have employed a range of non-pharmaceutical interventions, including social distancing, mask wearing, testing, contact tracing, travel restrictions, and quarantining. However, the cost of these measures has been a social and economic toll unparalleled in scope. 1 Improvements in testing capacity, alongside news of the efficacy of novel vaccines 2-4 and their rollout for many populations worldwide, provide much hope compared with the worrying public health outlook of 2020. Nonetheless, emerging data on novel genetic variants of SARS-CoV-2, 5 together with evidence of potential reinfections, 6-19 threaten the notion of immune protection following a primary infection and-of equal, if not more, concern-after vaccination. If the durability of immunity is hindered by changes in the genetic architecture of circulating SARS-CoV-2 strains, this would have key implications for relaxing the stringency of nonpharmaceutical interventions.

To understand the extent of this potential threat, in this Personal View we evaluate research on common respiratory viruses and previous pandemic human coronaviruses, and draw on the large body of emerging immunological data on SARS-CoV-2 infection. We focus on the developing knowledge of cellular and humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2, in response to both natural infection and vaccination, and present our views on what the available evidence means in terms of the longevity of protective immunity. We discuss areas of concern regarding the emergence of novel variants of SARS-CoV-2 and the growing evidence of human reinfection, and

• The duration and breadth of the humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 infection varies markedly by age and disease severity, with detectable neutralising responses present for up to 1 year after infection; memory B cells raised against the viral spike protein and its receptor binding domain are maintained in frequency for many months after recovery from infection and are able to generate potent neutralising antibodies upon viral rechallenge • Evidence from animal models, patient case studies, and large observational studies suggests that the time to reinfection is approximately 5-12 months, with individuals who were initially seropositive for IgG antibodies having a lower risk of reinfection • The cell-mediated response seems to be more polyepitopic than that of the humoral system, and the magnitude of the response greater in younger patients with less severe disease; a potent spike-specific memory T-cell response persists for 5-8 months after infection and might be mounted even in the presence of low neutralising antibody titres, reducing disease severity upon rechallenge • Vaccination elicits a spike-specific immune response of greater specificity and magnitude than that of natural infection, but emerging data suggest that protective immune responses, predominantly viral neutralisation, and vaccine effectiveness against infection are impaired against variants of concern • Given the considerable viral epitopic mutation, it is likely that SARS-CoV-2 vaccines will need to be updated on a seasonal or yearly basis to maintain population-level protective immunity, as is the case with other endemic respiratory viruses; other interventions might also be required to prevent the occurrence of further significant outbreaks and reduce the incidence of disease Personal View identify priorities for research to address current gaps in understanding.

SARS-CoV-2 belongs to the Coronavirinae subfamily of positive-sense RNA viruses, which includes four genera: Alphacoronavirus, Betacoronavirus, Gammacoronavirus, and Deltacoronavirus. Within the Coronavirinae are viruses that are frequently responsible for mild upper respiratory tract infections in humans: HcoV-229E, HcoV-NL63 (alphacoronaviruses), HcoV-OC43, and HcoV-HKU1 (betacoronaviruses). 20 Other betacoronaviruses include the previous pandemic viruses SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, which spilled over into human populations from bats and dromedary camels. 21 Although there are differences in the epidemiology of these various human coronaviruses, relevant insights can be gleaned on the host immune response to infection. For instance, SARS-CoV-2 has evolved various mechanisms to evade the innate immune response to infection (figure 1), with host recognition mechanisms and viral immune evasion pathways showing some similarities to those of previous pandemic coronaviruses. [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] Studies following patients who have recovered from SARS-CoV have found that circulating IgG responses are detectable for 2-3 years after infection, 27, 28 and neutralising antibodies have been identified after more than 6 months 29, 30 and even up to 12 years after infection. 31 Similarly, in patients who have recovered from MERS-CoV, neutralising antibodies have been detected up to 18 months after infection. 32 Albeit in a small cohort, a correlation was also found between disease severity and antibody longevity: asymptomatic patients were seronegative, whereas those recovering from severe disease had detectable antibodies 34 months after infection. 33 Animal models of MERS-CoV have shown that an inability to generate neutralising antibodies results in enhanced inflammation and poorer clinical outcomes upon viral rechallenge, suggesting an important role for neutralising antibodies in preventing reinfection by coronaviruses. 34 Among other respiratory viruses, including the seasonal coronaviruses, respiratory syncytial virus, and influenza virus, infection tends to lead to the production of neutralising antibodies that are transiently protective against reinfection. 35 Natural infection studies have shown that waning protective immunity allows for reinfection with seasonal coronaviruses within a 12-month window (although strain variation, not accounted for in these studies, might partly explain this short-lived immunity). 36, 37 In a study of adults naturally infected with respiratory syncytial virus, 73% (11 of 15) were reinfected within an 8-month period, 38 whereas in an infant study, 36% (45 of 125) were reinfected in a 24-month period from birth, with the risk of reinfection negatively correlating with the neutralising antibody titre from the previous infection. 39

The presence of neutralising antibodies is typically seen as one of the best correlates of effective immunity for a variety of pathogens. 40 Nonetheless, key challenges to understanding long-term immunity to SARS-CoV-2 are the lack of consensus on immune correlates of protection and the current paucity of human rechallenge studies. The first human challenge study, including 90 participants aged between the surface unit S1 of the S protein and host ACE2 and TMPRSS2, followed by endocytosis and viral genome release into the cytosol. 22 Intermediate double-stranded RNA forms, present during viral replication, are recognised as PAMPs by various cytosolic host PRRs, including MDA5, LGP2, and NOD1. 23 These PRRs signal through MAVS to activate a plethora of downstream components, in turn causing activation of IKKε and TBK1. These kinases phosphorylate IRF3, which dimerises and translocates to the nucleus where it activates various transcription factors (NF-κB, IRF3, IRF5) to induce transcription of genes encoding type I interferons. [24] [25] [26] The host cell also has type I interferon receptors with extracellular domains that bind type I interferons, leading to a molecular cascade via the JAK-STAT pathway that culminates in the binding of the STAT1-STAT2-IRF9 heterodimer to the ISRE and the stimulation of ISGs, which exert various antiviral effects. 23 SARS-CoV-2 can evade the antiviral effects of type I interferons by various molecular mechanisms. For example, nsp13 blocks phosphorylation of TBK1 and hence activation of IRF3, and various nsps and ORFs prevent phosphorylation of STAT1 and STAT2, in turn preventing the formation of the interferon-stimulated gene factor (ie, the STAT1-STAT2 heterodimer bound to IRF9). ORF6 also binds importin and blocks nuclear translocation of both STAT1 and IRF3, downregulating expression of ISGs and production of interferons. 24 

In critical cases of COVID-19, in which individuals require mechanical ventilation for several weeks as a result of acute respiratory distress syndrome, antibodies are raised against a range of viral antigens, with the majority of neutralising antibodies targeting epitopes on the spike protein (the viral envelope protein that mediates entry into host cells) and its receptor binding domain (RBD; the part of the spike protein required for viral binding to the host angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 [ACE2] receptor; figure 1). 22, [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] Although there is substantial heterogeneity between individuals in the duration of antibody responses, 50 patients with more severe disease, compared with milder disease, tend to have higher initial neutralising antibodies titres, 56-58 but emerging evidence suggests that these differences are lost within a few months owing to rapidly waning titres. 57 These antibody dynamics are consistent with those of other acute infections, including seasonal and pandemic coronaviruses, 33 and probably result from transient increases in plasmablast populations following infection (a short-lived stage between post-germinal centre B cells and plasma cells; figure 2 ). 57, [59] [60] [61] [62] Although accurate measures of antibody duration are hampered by inconsistencies among immunoassays 63 and the short length of many published longitudinal studies, several studies undertaken over longer time periods are now available, providing key insights into long-term antibody dynamics. For instance, one study found anti-spike and anti-RBD IgG and neutralising activity to persist in the majority of patients (90% and 60%, respectively) 9-11 months after symptom onset. 64 Another study showed that neutralising antibody responses were mounted 2 weeks after symptom onset in 101 of 150 (67·3%) patients (mostly admitted to hospital), and persisted for more than 8 months after symptom onset in all but three patients. 65 Overall, these and other data 66, 67 are consistent with detectable neutralising antibody responses lasting 8-12 months in patients with severe disease. Although this represents the current best estimate, as the time since SARS-CoV-2 emergence increases, longer follow-up periods will become feasible, further increasing the accuracy of such estimates. On a functional level, studies have shown delayed neutralising antibody responses to be associated with fatal outcomes and early neutralisation to correlate with faster viral clearance. 65, 68 Considerable evidence is now emerging for a role for the humoral response in preventing reinfection. [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] In addition to serum neutralising anti bodies, emerging evidence suggests that IgA present in mucosal membranes might contribute to early viral neutralisation to an even greater extent than serum IgG, 69 although the relative contributions of these two aspects of humoral immunity in protecting against (re-)infection remain to be thoroughly investigated. The detection of viral RNA in infected epithelial cells leads to the production of interferons and proinflammatory cytokines. Dendritic cells recognise the presence of PAMPs (eg, viral RNA) and inflammatory markers (eg, interferons), leading to their activation. Activated dendritic cells migrate to lymph nodes and present antigen (on MHC class I or class II molecules) and co-stimulatory molecules to immature T cells, which differentiate into CD8 + cytotoxic T lymphocytes, CD4 + T cells, or Tfh cells (all of which can differentiate into long-term memory cells). Tfh cells interact with and activate B cells, which differentiate into plasma cells (which produce high-affinity antibodies to specific viral antigens) or memory B cells. Viral antigens processed in phagolysosomes of infected epithelial cells are presented on the cell surface via MHC molecules. Peripherally circulating cytotoxic T lymphocytes recognise antigen-containing MHC class I molecules via their CD8 co-receptors, and interactions between CD8-T-cell co-receptors and MHC class I molecules activate cytotoxic T lymphocytes, leading to the release of proinflammatory cytokines and cytotoxic granules such as granzymes, which trigger apoptosis of the infected host cell. However, SARS-CoV-2 can hinder the adaptive immune response; the accessory protein ORF8 localises in lysosomes and downregulates trafficking of MHC class I molecules to the surface of epithelial cells, thereby reducing cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte-mediated killing of infected cells and downstream immune activation. 60 

In patients with milder COVID-19 who do not require hospital admission, the duration of the humoral response seems to be more variable. A longitudinal study of health-care workers with mild disease found that, although there was substantial heterogeneity between individuals in antibody responses, antibodies against the spike S1 domain (which correlated well with viral neutralisation) became undetectable in 31 of 143 (21·7%) patients over 4-5 months. 70 These results are generally concordant with those of a UK study of 2246 individuals with presentation ranging from asymptomatic to mildto-moderate disease, which showed similar proportions of reversion to seronegativity by 6 months; however, as also shown by others, 70,71 the findings were closely linked to the choice of immuno assay. 63 A longitudinal study of 15 patients recovering from mild disease, done over a shorter time period, found both persistently circulating anti-RBD IgG and the generation of anti-RBD memory B cells (MBCs) capable of producing neutralising antibodies 3 months after estimated viral exposure. 72 In keeping with this finding, a study of more than 30 000 suspected or confirmed cases (95% of whom had mild or moderate symptoms) reported that 90% of individuals who showed seroconversion had detectable neutralising antibodies that were correlated with anti-spike IgG titres. Moreover, these spike-targeting antibodies persisted for up to 5 months after symptom onset, 73 a timeframe supported by a study of 64 patients convalescing after mild-to-moderate disease. 49 Among those with mild disease, there is also evidence for a high proportion of individuals mounting weak primary humoral responses. 74, 75 For example, an investigation of 175 patients recovering from mild disease showed that approximately 30% generated very low titres of neutralising antibodies, with 10 patients having titres below the limit of detection. 75 Notably, antibody titres correlated well with age, with higher levels observed in older patients. 75 Overall, the duration of the humoral immune response is less clear for patients with milder symptoms, and although there is substantial variation within and between studies, the data might be consistent with a prolonged response over 5-6 months.

In asymptomatic patients, the decline in circulating antibody levels seems to be more pronounced than that in symptomatic patients. A comparison of 37 asymptomatic and 37 symptomatic patients in China identified similar IgG seroprevalence during the acute phase of the disease (81·1% and 83·8%, respectively). 76 However, in the convalescent phase, 8 weeks after symptom onset, 40·0% of asymptomatic patients reverted to IgG seronegativity compared with only 12·9% of symptomatic patients. There was also a trend for declining IgG titres and neutralisation rates across almost all patients, highlighting the short-lived nature of the circulating humoral response. 76 Similar conclusions were drawn from an analysis of 63 asymptomatic individuals in Wuhan, China, of whom 36·5% did not produce neutralising antibodies; among those who did, circulating levels began to fall after 25 days. 74 An analysis of 254 SARS-CoV-2positive individuals showed that outpatients with milder or no symptoms had lower anti-RBD antibody titres (IgA, IgM, and IgG) than did individuals with severe disease requiring inpatient care. 51 Similarly, the declines in antibody titres were more rapid in those with milder symptoms. Pseudovirus neutral isation assays showed that viral neutralisation correlated well with anti-RBD IgG titres, with inpatients showing higher neutralisation activity than outpatients. 51 Together, these studies suggest that although the waning of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody titres is an intrinsic aspect of the disease course, the initial magnitude of response and the speed of decline vary with disease severity. Nonetheless, the declines in antibody titres noted in these studies are arguably consistent with what is known about humoral dynamics following infection with other respiratory viruses, such as SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. 20,32

Although circulating antibodies provide a simple means of estimating immune protection, they are not the only measure of long-term immunity. Following viral clearance, the antibody-producing plasmablast population contracts, leaving a pool of specialised MBCs, 77 which probably accounts for the fall in circulating antibodies seen across various studies. 57, 59 Whereas neutralising antibodies might decline over 5-12 months, MBCs are maintained or increase in frequency, 77-81 undergo extensive clonal expansion, 80 and can generate potent neutralising antibodies against the RBD upon rechallenge. 72, 78 Hence, longevity of MBCs capable of producing neutralising antibodies might counteract the pitfalls of a relatively short-lived circulating antibody response. 78 The production of MBCs might also provide a useful indication of the time from infection to disease resolution. For example, the frequency of MBCs has been found to correlate negatively with symptom duration 82 and to increase following recovery from infection, 83 indicating a potential role in ameliorating disease severity. Although further studies characterising the dynamics of MBCs after infection and vaccination would be beneficial (panel), 41, 84, 85 such studies require the use of cumbersome assays that might not be feasible in many clinical, or even academic, settings.

Several studies have noted an increase in atypical populations of MBCs (not expressing or downregulating CD21 or CD27, the classic hallmarks of MBCs) in patients with severe disease, which is in line with findings from chronic infections such as malaria and HIV. 83, 86 Although the functional significance of these atypical MBCs is not fully understood, their frequency decreases upon recovery and increases in patients who die from COVID-19,

suggesting an association with poorer patient outcomes. 83 Overall, these findings indicate that clonally expanded pools of MBCs are likely to persist for more than 6 months after primary infection. Although the relative contribution of immune memory towards lasting protection against reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 is unclear (panel), emerging evidence suggests that MBCs might evolve towards non-neutralising profiles over time, particularly in older patients, highlighting the benefit of vaccination. 87

There is a substantial body of evidence on the role of cellular immunity in response to respiratory virus infection. Whereas antibody responses to a range of respiratory viruses, including SARS-CoV and influenza A virus, are transient, the T-cell response, which is targeted against internal (in the case of cytotoxic T cells) and conserved proteins, tends to be longer lived. 88 For example, in a 6-year follow-up of patients infected with SARS-CoV, memory T cells (MTCs) were found in 61% of patients, whereas MBCs were absent. 27 Various studies of SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV also show the importance of a T-cell response in maintaining long-term immune protection and diminishing the severity of clinical disease. [88] [89] [90] Similarly, the severity of COVID-19 is negatively associated with T-cell counts (with lymphopenia being a classic sign of severe COVID-19) 91 and positively associated with the abundance of proinflammatory cytokines. [92] [93] [94] Hence, several studies point to the considerable importance of an appropriately proportioned cell-mediated response in effecting SARS-CoV-2 clearance. The primary focus of these studies, which have encompassed patient cohorts of various clinical severities from several countries worldwide, has been the functional analysis of T cells circulating in the peripheral blood, including key repertoires of CD4 + helper T cells 95 and CD8 + cytotoxic T cells 96 (figure 2). However, correlation between peripheral cellular responses and tissue-resident responses can be poor, 85, 97 suggesting that future studies should focus on compartment-specific immune repertoires (panel).

Various techniques have been used to define epitope specificities of the T-cell response, as its breadth has important implications for the likelihood of viral immune escape. In particular, megapools combining a large number of epitopes have been used to comprehensively map epitope binding specificities of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells across the entirety of the viral proteome in patients convalescing from a variety of disease courses, revealing several key insights. First, highly expressed viral proteins tend to have a proportionally large CD4 + T-cell response mounted against them, with the top three targets including spike (27%), membrane (21%), and nucleocapsid (11%) proteins, 98 an association that is corroborated by other research into CD4 + and CD8 + epitope specificities. 99 Second, spike-specific CD4 + responses correlate well with the magnitude of anti-RBD IgG titres, indicating a coordinated cellular and humoral response to the virus; 98 Why do some secondary infections result in less severe disease, whereas others cause more severe disease relative to primary infections? Patient cohorts should be followed over time, with measures of multiple aspects of the immune response, in addition to clinical characteristics, after primary and secondary exposure; limitations of this type of study might include difficulty in controlling for genetic differences in infecting strains, which could influence the exposure and outcome variables

Further studies are needed to compare bronchoalveolar lavage fluid with paired samples of blood from infected patients 85

indeed, a lack of coordination is associated with more severe disease. 100, 101 Third, asymptomatic individuals can develop a robust MTC response even in the absence of detectable antibodies. 98, [101] [102] [103] Finally, CD4 + and CD8 + T cells have a large breadth of epitope binding targets-at 19 and 17 per donor, respectively, in one study. 99 Taken together, these results suggest that cell-mediated immunity to SARS-CoV-2 infection is robust and durable to small mutational changes.

Similar to the humoral response, the magnitude of the cell-mediated response appears to be associated with disease severity. For example, in a two-centre retrospective study of 1018 patients admitted to hospital with confirmed COVID-19, all T-cell counts were lower in non-survivors compared with survivors, a difference that was particularly pronounced for CD8 + T cells. Indeed, a multivariable analysis adjusting for age, sex, and underlying conditions found that low abundance of CD8 + T cells was an independent risk factor for mortality. 104 These results agree with those from a longitudinal analysis of a small cohort of patients with severe disease, which revealed associations between the early detection of IFN-γ-secreting T cells specific to SARS-CoV-2, faster viral clearance, and milder symptomatology. 105 In a retrospective study of 522 patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19, total T-cell counts were 60% lower in patients in intensive care than in those with milder disease. 106 There are also negative effects of excessive proinflammatory cytokine production on both patient outcomes 104 and T-cell counts, 106 indicative of a role for overproduction of proinflammatory cytokines in downregulating T-cell survival or proliferation. In keeping with the importance of T cells in mitigating severe outcomes, SARS-CoV-2specific T-cell counts decrease with increasing age, 106 perhaps accounting for the well documented increased likelihood of poorer prognoses among older individuals. 107 Indeed, in patients with more severe disease, there is upregulation of a marker of T-cell exhaustion, programmed cell death 1 receptor. 106 Taken together, these findings suggest that an effective T-cell response protects against severe outcomes in SARS-CoV-2 infection.

The development of cell-mediated immune memory might provide long-term protection against severe disease upon viral rechallenge. Various studies of previous pandemic coronaviruses have shown that MTC responses outlast those of MBCs 27,108 and are protective against severe disease upon rechallenge. [88] [89] [90] For example, mice with CD8 + MTCs, but without CD4 + MTCs or MBCs, given a high dose of SARS-CoV mounted an effective immune response, including the production of cytokines and cytolytic molecules, which led to reduced viral load and allowed the mice to survive an otherwise lethal dose of SARS-CoV. 90 Research on cell-mediated aspects of SARS-CoV-2 infection has shown that infection leads to the production of long-lived cytotoxic MTCs, with a longitudinal study estimating the half-life of CD8 + MTCs to be 125-225 days. 81 Moreover, the majority of the CD8 + MTCs were phenotypically characterised as being terminally differentiated effector memory cells. 81 These MTC subpopulations are protective against severe disease upon influenza A virus challenge, 109 suggesting that secondary infections with SARS-CoV-2 might be milder (however, confounding factors that future studies of this kind might face are outlined in the panel).

Cell-mediated immune memory is important not only in its own right, but also because its coordination with the humoral immune response has a major role in the production of MBCs. T follicular helper (Tfh) cells, a specialised subset of CD4 + T cells found in the B-cell zone of secondary lymphoid organs, play a key part in this process. These cells provide co-stimulation to germinal centre B cells to effect their positive selection, proliferation, and differentiation into long-lived antibody-secreting plasma cells and MBCs (figure 2). 110 Thus, the analysis of The raw data, with uncertainties (the narrowest 68% interval in the beta distribution implied by the number of positives and number of negatives on a particular day), are plotted and an exponential fit is shown. The data show that it is possible to test positive more than 6 weeks after symptom onset, especially when the specimen is taken from locations other than the upper respiratory tract (eg, blood or faeces). Data were extracted from a published systematic review of individual data. 

Tfh cells circulating in the peripheral blood provides a useful proxy to understand the extent of humoral immune memory resulting from SARS-CoV-2 infection. 111 These studies have shown considerable stability in the relative frequencies of memory Tfh cells, including spike-specific cells, over long time periods (>6 months). 81 Notably, Tfh cells expressing chemokine receptor 6, which is associated with reduced COVID-19 severity, 100 comprise a large portion of Tfh cell populations 72,81,100,111 and persist, or even increase, 81 in frequency over relatively long time periods. As T cells are known to target more conserved epitopes than do antibodies, 88 and to have key roles in viral clearance, reduced disease severity upon rechallenge, and the establishment of pools of both affinity-maturated B cells and MBCs, 112 these data raise the possibility that cell-mediated immune memory to SARS-CoV-2 could provide effective protection against reinfection; however, questions still remain (panel).

While many studies have examined the temporal dynamics of the humoral response to SARS-CoV-2, a smaller, but growing, number have instead assessed whether a decline in humoral immunity reduces protection from reinfection, a question with implications for the effectiveness of control strategies. Unfortunately, reports of reinfection are confounded by several factors, including long-lasting positivity to RT-PCR assays (figure 3), 113 persistent viral shedding, and viral reactivation, all of which can introduce uncertainty in distinguishing true cases of reinfection from cases of singular infection with prolonged positivity. Some case studies have been able to disentangle these two distinct possibilities using genomic sequencing, either alone or in combination with information on the period of time between positive tests, sandwiched by one or more negative tests (table 1) . 6-14 Cases for which the time periods between primary and secondary infections were short and genetic change minimal, particularly for some patients from China (table 1) , 14 might not represent true cases of reinfection but prolonged PCR positivity (patients might remain PCR-positive >6 weeks after infection, especially when the sample is taken from the lower respiratory tract, blood, or faeces; 113, 114 figure 3 ). This risk can be avoided by defining reinfection on the basis of a minimum time interval between primary and secondary infections that is longer than the maximum known duration of PCR positivity (eg, 60 days 16 or 90 days 17, 19 ) , or by using a shorter time period in combination with genomic confirmation. 18 Nonetheless, the remaining cases that are more likely to represent true reinfections suggest that, as the severity of illness upon reinfection appears to be unpredictable, a pertinent area for further research might be the investigation of possible causes of varying symptom severity upon reinfection (panel). Data were obtained on Feb 9, 2021. All cases had RT-PCR-negative results between first and second episodes. Ct=cycle threshold. NA=not available. *Indicates potential reinfection cases that were not confirmed through genomic analysis. †Serological data were not analysed using a cutoff threshold to designate seropositive and seronegative; see original paper for findings. 

In addition to evidence from case studies, findings from large epidemiological studies provide informative data on the protective effect of the antibody response and risk of reinfection. For example, two large prospective cohort studies from the UK, one that followed 12 541 health-care workers over 7 months 16 and another that followed 20 787 health-care workers over 5 months, 15 estimated that individuals who were seropositive for antispike IgG at baseline had an 88% and 83% reduced risk of infection, respectively, relative to those who were seronegative at baseline. In both studies, the median time to reinfection was 5-6 months. 15, 16 General population data are currently sparse, but one large digital observational study using a Danish population-level dataset of 4 million individuals 19 adds to the UK studies' findings. Serostatus data were not available, but the 12-month study showed that PCR positivity at baseline was associated with a 77-83% lower risk of reinfection compared with PCR negativity at baseline. However, individuals aged 65 years and older who were PCR-positive at baseline had a 47% reduced chance of reinfection, 19 suggesting that longevity of the sterilising immune response might be reduced in older individuals. The study also showed that the estimated protection against reinfection did not differ by the time since primary infection, 19 suggesting that protection against reinfection might, in fact, last for 12 or more months. The discrepancy between the time-to-reinfection findings of the UK and Danish studies could potentially be explained by the choice of study setting. As health-care workers tend to be in closer proximity to infectious patients and hence are likely to receive higher viral loads, and encounter a greater variety of viral strains, than individuals in the general population, reinfection timeframes might be expected to be shorter in this subpopulation.

Another retrospective cohort study, involving 3·2 million people in the USA, showed that individuals who were seropositive for IgG, IgA, or IgM antibodies at baseline had a ten-times reduced risk of testing PCR-positive 90 days later compared with those who were seronegative at baseline. 17 Corroborating these findings, the results of a prospective cohort study in Qatar indicated that, over a 7-month period, the incidence of reinfection among initially seropositive individuals was almost 95% lower than that in initially seronegative individuals. Similar to the Danish cohort, there was no evidence of waning immunity against reinfection over the 7-month period. 18 Although observational studies are limited by the short time period since SARS-CoV-2 emergence, current evidence suggests that reinfection can occur within 5-12 months of primary infection, a timeframe that is similar to that for other acute respiratory viral infections (table 2) . [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [35] [36] [37] 39, [115] [116] [117] [118] [119] [120] [121] [122] Nonetheless, it is unclear whether the time to reinfection suggested by the available data could become shorter with escape from neutralisation by variants of concern (VOCs), including (but not limited to) the alpha (B.1.1.7), beta (B.1.351), and gamma (P.1) variants, and the B.1.617 lineage, a subtype of which is the delta variant (B.1.617.2). [123] [124] [125] [126] [127] [128] While studies of other respiratory viruses such as human coronavirus and influenza A suggest that homologous reinfection is uncommon, 84, 115 the picture is less clear for SARS-CoV-2. Further studies that could be done to investigate this, and related questions, are documented in the panel. Overall, the research highlighted here demonstrates that the humoral response is a key element of the host response to SARS-CoV-2 protection against reinfection.

Aside from natural infections, there is also evidence for a robust and potentially long-lasting immune response arising from licensed SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. 4,129 A large variety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines has been developed, with 11 demonstrating efficacy in phase 3 trials and more than 270 in development. 130, 131 Adenoviral vector vaccines in particular, such as those developed for Ebola 132 and malaria 133 and, most recently, SARS-CoV-2, 4,129 are known to induce a robust cellular immune response. For example, a phase 1/2 trial of the SARS-CoV-2 adenovirus vector vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) showed that vaccination elicited a spike-specific T-cell response as early as 7 days after vaccination, which was maintained until day 56. 129 A follow-up phase 2/3 trial using an ex-vivo IFN-γ enzyme-linked immunospot 0·09-1·10 per 10 000 days at risk 36, 115 Data were extracted from published studies and rates of reinfection were transformed such that they were comparable between studies. ACE2=angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. APN=human aminopeptidase N. CX3CR1=CX3C chemokine receptor 1. HSPG=heparan sulfate proteoglycan. NA=not applicable. TMPRSS2=transmembrane protease serine 2. *There is some uncertainty as to whether immunity against influenza A is lifelong in some circumstances. Personal View assay on peripheral blood mononuclear cells showed that spike-specific T cells peaked at 14 days after the initial dose and were maintained at high levels across all age groups until the last day of measurement on day 42. 134 Other SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have also shown promise.

Early clinical trial data on the mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) demonstrated 95% effectiveness against disease, measured at least 7 days after the second dose, in people aged over 16 years; 3 however, subsequent data have shown reductions in effectiveness against more recently circulating variants. 125, 135 In a phase 1/2 trial of this vaccine, strong and correlated CD4 + and CD8 + T-cell responses were raised against a variety of spike epitopes 7 days after the second (booster) dose. 136 Furthermore, the mRNA vaccine mRNA-1273 (Moderna) elicited a robust CD4 + type 1 helper T-cell response in a phase 1 trial, with concurrent production of IL-2, tumour necrosis factor, and IFN-γ. 137 Although vaccine rollout plans involve dosing with homologous vaccine types, results from an in-vivo study suggest that dosing with heterologous types could lead to a more robust cellmediated response, 138 and hence might provide longerlasting protection against severe symptoms. Numerous trials have shown robust humoral responses in participants after vaccination. For example, an increase in anti-spike IgG was observed after administration of the second dose of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, which correlated well with neutralising antibody titres in all age groups (but see our discussion of vaccine-elicited neutralisation of VOCs, below). 134 In addition, a phase 1/2 trial of the BNT162b2 vaccine identified that neutralising titres following the primary dose exceeded those observed among naturally infected convalescing patients; however, more recent research has found that those infected before vaccination mount similar, or stronger, immune responses than do previously unexposed, double-dose vaccinated individuals. 136, 139 In pseudovirus neutralisation assays, serum samples from vaccinated individuals neutralised a diverse range of SARS-CoV-2 spike variants (but see our discussion on immune responses against VOCs). 136 Humoral responses after mRNA-1273 vaccination were also substantial, with serum neutralisation detectable in all participants following the second dose. 137

Phase 3 vaccine trials, alongside emerging data on reduced cases, hospital admissions, and deaths, 140, 141 demonstrate the success of vaccine rollout in various countries worldwide. These trials-undertaken before VOCs were detected-used the neutralising antibody titre as a correlate of protection (ie, an immune marker, or threshold, associated with protection against infection or disease). 139 However, there are several important reasons that appropriate, more specific correlates of protection are still needed, including the identification of key titre thresholds. First, in the absence of reliable correlates of protection, next-generation vaccine development is likely to lag substantially behind the emergence of novel variants, as large and costly field trials must be undertaken to establish vaccine effectiveness against these newer variants. In the face of vaccine-escape mutants, these randomised controlled trials might become unethical (or, in low-incidence populations, unfeasible). Second, identifying specific correlates of protection would enable direct comparisons of different vaccines through immunological thresholds, rather than via crude effectiveness rates. 130, 142 Finally, although not exhaustively, information on correlates of protection could be used to inform mathematical model parameters, with potential uses in predicting the durability of vaccinederived protection and informing pandemic and postpandemic interventions.

For acute infections such as SARS-CoV-2, neutralisingor non-neutralising but functional-antibodies are often considered an appropriate correlate of protection, 35,131,143 a supposition supported by the evidence on protection from reinfection. 6-19 Nonetheless, delineating specific titre thresholds is challenging for several reasons-eg, correlates of protection probably differ between infection and vaccination, and between different vaccine types, and might be altered by prior exposure, 136, 139, 144, 145 emerging variants, and immuno deficiency. 143 In addition, whether there is a focus on correlates of protection against infection or disease will probably shape the markers and thresholds that are identified as important; a notable example is measles vaccination, for which specific antibody titres provide protection against disease but not always infection. 143, 146 Although SARS-CoV-2 vaccine correlates of protection remain ill-defined, 143,147 a statistical analysis of phase 3 data from seven vaccines indicated that neutralising antibody or IgG titres measured 1-4 weeks after the second dose (both calibrated to a common standard) might explain 78% and 94%, respectively, of the variation in vaccine efficacy. 130 Importantly, these findings are consistent with the reported associations between reduced viral neutralisation of VOCs and reduced vaccine effectiveness, 128, [148] [149] [150] [151] while possibly also supporting the previously posited notion that vaccine-elicited antibodies need not be neutralising to have a protective effect. 131 Another study that examined immune correlates of protection by incorporating data from seven vaccine trials and from convalescent serum samples into a predictive model estimated the neutralisation titres required for protection against severe disease to be more than 6·5-times lower than those against detectable infection, 152 suggesting that although reinfections might be likely with waning protective immunity, such cases should generally be milder. This model also suggested that neutralising antibody half-lives were similar between natural infection and vaccination. 152 However, further research is required to corroborate these findings, and other immunological markers are likely to have an important influence on protective immunity after vaccination (eg, MBCs), 153 and might explain findings of protection in the presence of low Personal View neutralising antibody titres. 131 A more detailed delineation of correlates of protection, including protective antibody titre thresholds, 152 in addition to other important immunological markers, will be needed to assist epidemiological studies and the development and rollout of next-generation vaccines in the coming months and years.

The majority of licensed COVID-19 vaccines use a (homologous) two-dose prime-boost strategy, with only a few exceptions, including the single-dose adenovirusvector Ad26.COV2.S vaccine (Janssen). 154 Whether this blanket strategy should be applied irrespective of individual infection history has been called into question by emerging data. Accumulating evidence suggests that the post-vaccine immune response in individuals infected before primary vaccination might be similar to, or even more robust than, that in unexposed individuals receiving conventional prime-boost doses. 136, 139, 144, 145 However, it is important to note that many uncertainties remain that might make differential provision of second doses on the basis of exposure status 144 a risky strategy. For instance, it is unclear whether exposed, prime-dose vaccinated individuals would have similar protection against reinfection with VOCs compared with unexposed individuals receiving conventional prime-boost doses, although in-vitro studies suggest that this might be possible. 153 By contrast, emerging data on vaccine protection against VOCs are clear: two doses provide substantially more protection against infection with VOCs than does one dose, irrespective of the vaccine. 125, 135 Additionally, the longterm dynamics of relevant immune cells might differ substantially according to which of these two strategies is used; early data 136, 139, 144, 145, 153 are only beginning to emerge to enable rigorous evaluation of this question. A more cautious approach, but one that still recognises the importance of the evidence presented, might be to prioritise second doses for previously unexposed individuals, 144 but to still provide second doses to exposed individuals where logistically possible. Such an approach is supported by data showing that breakthrough infections among recipients of a second dose occur less often in previously exposed than in unexposed individuals (3-month cumulative incidence of 0·42% among previously exposed BNT162b2 booster-dose recipients compared with 0·90% among unexposed booster-dose recipients). 155 Despite this, in resource-poor settings with limited vaccine stocks, focusing second doses on those previously unexposed 153 could provide a means of resource allocation that lessens the burden on public health systems.

The emergence of several variants in late 2020 with substitutions in the RBD (notably Lys417Asn, Glu484Lys, and Asn501Tyr), 156 which increase binding affinity to ACE2, 157 has led to concerns over the efficacy of vaccines in development. Although there are few data (and fewer peer-reviewed data) on the T-cell response to VOCs, those that exist are encouraging. For example, a study of 121 health-care workers who received the BNT162b2 vaccine showed no change in CD4 + T-cell activation when serum samples were stimulated with alpha and beta variant spike protein pools compared with the wildtype protein. 158 Furthermore, findings of a study that sampled serum from individuals 14 days after receiving their second dose of the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccine suggested that MTCs were equally reactive to the ancestral strain and VOCs (alpha, epsilon [B.1.429, also known as CAL20C], and gamma), with the exception of the beta variant, for which CD4 + and CD8 + responses were 29% and 33% lower, respectively. 159 Another study found that CD8 + T-cell responses from convalescent individuals recognised the majority of epitopes of circulating variants, with the exception of one spike mutation (Asp80Ala) from the beta variant. 160 Although the latter two studies are not based on serum samples from vaccinated individuals, these data suggest that T-cell cross-reactivity should provide some level of protection against VOCs. However, as correlates of protection are ill-defined, 143,147 the extent of epitopic mutation that would lead to immune escape from this cross-reactivity remains unclear, although emerging evidence suggests that escape from neutralisation by VOCs might be considerable. Taken together, these results suggest that SARS-CoV-2 vaccination elicits a strong cell-mediated response that might be resilient to changes in the viral genome, including those in the RBD. Nonetheless, there is a paucity of evidence on the cell-mediated response to VOCs, thus limiting our understanding.

Data are also emerging on the humoral response to VOCs, with various studies noting reduced viral neutralisation in response to both natural infection and vaccination. 123, 124, 156, [161] [162] [163] [164] Most notable are multiple reports of the beta variant evading neutralisation from the serum of vaccinated individuals. For example, among individuals receiving two doses of the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccine, one study found neutralising activity against this variant to be 10-12-times lower than that against the wild-type, 156 while another found 19-42-times reductions in neutralisation. 124 Moreover, these effects appear to translate into diminished vaccine efficacy: a South African trial of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine showed a substantial decrease in efficacy against mild-to-moderate COVID-19 (measured ≥14 days after the second dose) caused by the beta variant (10% efficacy) compared with earlier South African variants (75% efficacy). 148 These results also agree with those of an interim analysis of a trial of the nanoparticle spike protein vaccine NVX-CoV2373 (Novavax; not yet formally published), which showed lower efficacy against the beta variant than against earlier Personal View variants. 149 Among other variants, viral neutralisation from serum samples of individuals who have received two doses of the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines is also decreased against the gamma and zeta (P.2) variants, by 4-7-times and 3-6-times, respectively. 124 A number of other studies using serum from individuals who received the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines have shown either marginally reduced neutralisation against the alpha variant 163, 164 or largely unchanged neutralisation profiles against several variants. 124, 156, 165 However, further evidence suggests that even this marginal change in immune response is associated with a decrease in two-dose vaccine efficacy against symptomatic infection from 81·5% (BetaCoV/Australia/VIC01/2020 strain) to 70·4% (alpha variant) for the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (measured >14 days after the booster dose) 150 and from 95·6% to 85·6% for the NVX-CoV2373 vaccine (measuring timepoint not yet reported). 151 Early data on the B.1.617 lineage, which has two RBD mutations, suggest that it can evade neutralisation by antibodies induced by infection or vaccination with moderate efficiency. 126, 127 Efficacy after a single dose of the BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines against symptomatic disease through delta variant infection has been reported to be 33·5%, rising to 87·9% (BNT162b2) or 59·8% (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) after two doses (measured ≥3 weeks after vaccination). 135 Nonetheless, symptom onset has been poorly recorded in the testing data and is considered largely unreliable. Furthermore, fully sequenced genomic data are scarce; hence, further published data corroborating these findings are required.

Another method of assessing the durability of vaccineelicited immunity against VOCs is by examining emerging data on breakthrough infections (those occurring in vaccinated individuals). In a cohort of 417 individuals in New York City, USA, two breakthrough infections were identified in individuals who had received their second dose 19 and 36 days previously. 166 Sequencing data indicated that the SARS-CoV-2 variant in each patient had key spike mutations, including a Glu484Lys mutation in one patient, which is recognised to facilitate viral avoidance of antibody neutralisation. Analysis of serum from this patient revealed high levels of neutralising antibodies, 166 further supporting the notion of viral neutralisation escape from (presumably vaccine-elicited) antibodies. Another study, from Israel, which sequenced genomes from 817 nasopharyngeal swabs of BNT162b2-vaccinated individuals showed that the alpha and beta variants were disproportionately represented in breakthrough infections (defined as those occurring ≥14 days after the prime dose, or ≥7 days after the booster dose). Specifically, compared with unvaccinated controls, a higher proportion of boosterdose vaccinated individuals showed evidence of betavariant infection, whereas a higher proportion of prime-dose vaccinated individuals were infected with the alpha variant. 167 Other reports of similar breakthrough infections with VOCs are also emerging. 155, 168 Of the study designs that allow for prevalence estimation, breakthrough infections have thus far been identified among prime-dose recipients with a prevalence of 2·6% (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccinees, no sequencing performed), 169 155 and 2·0% (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccinees, no sequencing performed). 169 Another study, which did not group participants by vaccine dose, found a prevalence of breakthrough infections of 1·13% among individuals who received the BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccines, although no sequencing was performed to identify the variants. 168 Owing to the relatively short time since vaccine rollout began, it remains to be seen whether breakthrough infections will become substantially more frequent in the coming months. These early data nonetheless suggest that the durability of vaccine-induced immunity is affected by VOCs. Encouragingly, however, breakthrough infections appear to infrequently result in onwards transmission, and to occur less often in previously exposed individuals who have been vaccinated. 155 Overall, data on the immune response to VOCs demonstrate the need for broadly protective SARS-CoV-2 vaccines (as also suggested by several others 6,163 ). Although the mutation rate of coronaviruses is notably lower than, for example, that for influenza A virus-and hence, in the majority of vaccinated individuals, protection is unlikely to be lost completely beyond 12 months 170 -in the shortto-medium term current vaccines will require updating to maintain their effectiveness; indeed, this development is already underway for the gamma and beta variants. 148 Precisely when this change will need to occur will be guided by advances in our ability to specifically classify immune correlates of protection. 147 Moreover, it is likely that, even with improved understanding of correlates of protection, vaccine development and deployment will lag sub stantially behind outbreaks caused by novel VOCs and, therefore, vaccination alone might be inadequate to preclude further epidemics. Particular attention should be paid to higher-risk populations, including immunocom promised patients and those on immunosuppressant drugs, who might not mount durable immune responses, particularly when vaccination is improperly coordinated with immunosuppressant therapy (as demonstrated among immunosuppressed patients receiving pneumococcal and influenza vaccines). 171 Among the general population, the lower prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 brought about by vaccination and non-pharmaceutical inter ventions should nonetheless lead to a lower rate of novel variant emergence, 172 meanwhile enabling the development of secondary vaccines and other interventions.

As of Oct 1, 2021, some countries have begun to offer third doses of vaccinations to higher-risk individuals, including severely immunocompromised patients,

older individuals, and health-care workers. 173, 174 This approach, which has been the subject of discussion in articles published since our literature search was completed, might be supported by data showing waning immunity against infection with the delta variant since the last vaccination, 175 and by studies suggesting that a third dose increases the magnitude and breadth of viral neutralisation. 176 However, concerns about the equity of such a decision have been raised-in particular, the equity of offering third doses in high-income countries while many low-income and middle-income countries have insufficient vaccine stocks to obtain adequate firstdose and second-dose coverage. 177 The question of whether third doses should be provided to the wider population, rather than to specific subpopulations only, is also under consideration. 173

In this Personal View, we have evaluated evidence on the adaptive immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination, and discussed the relative contributions of humoral and cell-mediated immunity in providing protection against reinfection. Although the immune correlates of protection are ill-defined, neutralising antibodies and functional T-cell responses are often used to infer the robustness of the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 challenge.

Upon natural infection, the T-cell-mediated response appears to be targeted across a larger variety of epitopes than the humoral response, and hence might be more durable to genetic changes in key immunogenic viral epitopes. Nonetheless, the neutralising antibody response also comprises a key aspect of protection against reinfection. Coordination between the two types of adaptive immune response is likely to be important to mitigate the most severe consequences of infection. Populations of specific memory B cells and T cells remain stable or even increase in size many months after SARS-CoV-2 exposure, which might reduce the likelihood of severe disease upon reinfection. The available evidence suggests that reinfection could occur within 5-12 months of a primary infection and is more likely in individuals who are seronegative for IgG antibodies. Inter ventions to inhibit transmission of SARS-CoV-2 might be required even in places where the herd immunity threshold has been reached naturally or artificially, and observed increases in severity and transmissibility will further drive the imperative for localised or national non-pharmaceutical interventions.

Compared with the immune response to natural infection, vaccination elicits a response of greater magnitude and higher specificity, largely focused on the RBD. Increasing evidence of reduced neutralisation and vaccine effectiveness against emerging variants, alongside emerging data on breakthrough infections, suggests that vaccines will need to be updated in the short-to-medium term. Such updates will be greatly aided by further investigation of vaccine immune correlates of protection. Since completing our literature search on July 26, 2021, several key reports have been published that encourage cautious optimism. For instance, a prospective cohort study of the Scottish population (2·57 million people) 178 showed that during the winter of 2020-21 (the peak of the pandemic), among individuals who had received one dose of either BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, only 1196 were admitted to hospital or died due to SARS-CoV-2 infection (<0·1% of the cohort). These findings agree with those from a large study of US health records, 179 which showed that two-dose vaccine (BNT162b2) effectiveness against hospital admission following infection with the delta variant remains at 93% up to 6 months after second-dose vaccination, despite waning effectiveness against infection (from 88% in the first month after the second dose to 47% after 5 months). New data also show that the odds of having long-lasting symptoms (≥28 days post-infection) is halved among those who received their second dose of either BNT162b2, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, or mRNA-1273 at least 28 days previously, compared with unvaccinated individuals (odds ratio 0·51). 180 Ultimately, the duration of protective immunity from natural infection and from vaccination will determine the frequency of outbreaks (eg, annual, biennial, or more sporadic) 181 and the burden on healthcare systems of symptomatic disease, and in turn shape the public health policies of nations around the world in the years to come.

TW and TH conceived the article idea. GM, TW, and TH collated and interpreted the published literature and wrote the first draft of the Personal View, with subsequent input and critical review from CS, NG, AJ, and RMA. All authors contributed substantially to the text and take full accountability for the accuracy and integrity of the work.

We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for articles published in English from database inception until March 29, 2021-and updated the search on May 17, 2021, and July 26, 2021, as the paper was revised-using various combinations of the terms "COVID-19", "SARS-CoV-2", "humoral", "antibody", "cell-mediated", "T-cell", "immunity", "memory", "reinfection", and "variant(s) of concern". Articles resulting from these searches (approximately 1000-7000 results from our PubMed search on May 17, 2021, depending on search term combinations) and relevant references cited in these articles were reviewed. Studies of robust design with relevance to the main aim of this Personal View-to provide readers with a view of what we have learnt about the longevity of protective immunity-were included. High-quality preprints with findings that pertained to the aims of the paper were considered; final publication details were added, where possible, as the paper was prepared for publication.

Declaration of interests GM was, at the time of writing, a research analyst for the Infectious Disease Modelling Team at the Joint Biosecurity Centre (JBC) of the UK Government Department of Health and Social Care. TH was, at the time of writing, a research analyst for National Alerting and Assessment at the JBC. TW leads the Infectious Disease Modelling Team at the JBC. AJ is a senior data scientist at the Department of Health and Social Care. NG is a senior public health consultant for emergency response at Public Health England. The authors declare no competing interests in relation to the content of this Personal View.

Antibody status and incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in health care workers

Association of SARS-CoV-2 seropositive antibody test with risk of future infection

SARS-CoV-2 antibody-positivity protects against reinfection for at least seven months with 95% efficacy

Assessment of protection against reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 among 4 million PCR-tested individuals in Denmark in 2020: a population-level observational study

Highlight of immune pathogenic response and hematopathologic effect in SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-Cov-2 infection

Zoonotic origins of human coronaviruses

SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor

MDA5 Governs the innate immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in lung epithelial cells

Evasion of type I interferon by SARS-CoV-2

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) membrane (M) protein inhibits type I and III interferon production by targeting RIG-I/MDA-5 signaling

Phosphorylation of innate immune adaptor proteins MAVS, STING, and TRIF induces IRF3 activation

Lack of peripheral memory B cell responses in recovered patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome: a six-year follow-up study

Duration of antibody responses after severe acute respiratory syndrome

Longitudinal profile of immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgM, and IgA antibodies against the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus nucleocapsid protein in patients with pneumonia due to the SARS coronavirus

Longitudinally profiling neutralizing antibody response to SARS coronavirus with pseudotypes

Long-Term Persistence of IgG Antibodies in SARS-CoV Infected Healthcare Workers

Antibody response and disease severity in healthcare worker MERS survivors

Persistence of antibodies against middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus

Enhanced inflammation in New Zealand white rabbits when MERS-CoV reinfection occurs in the absence of neutralizing antibody

Durability of immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses

Direct observation of repeated infections with endemic coronaviruses

Seasonal coronavirus protective immunity is short-lasting

Immunity to and frequency of reinfection with respiratory syncytial virus

Risk of primary infection and reinfection with respiratory syncytial virus

Neutralizing antibodies correlate with protection from SARS-CoV-2 in humans during a fishery vessel outbreak with a high attack rate

COVID-19 human challenge studies in the UK

First volunteers on COVID-19 human challenge study leave quarantine. Imperial College London

A SARS-CoV-2 infection model in mice demonstrates protection by neutralizing antibodies

Syrian hamsters as a small animal model for SARS-CoV-2 infection and countermeasure development

Isolation of potent SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies and protection from disease in a small animal model

Dose-dependent response to infection with SARS-CoV-2 in the ferret model and evidence of protective immunity

SARS-CoV-2 infection protects against rechallenge in rhesus macaques

Detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral and cellular immunity in COVID-19 convalescent individuals

Evolution of immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 in mild-moderate COVID-19

Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibody responses and duration of immunity: a longitudinal study

Defining the features and duration of antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection associated with disease severity and outcome

Not just antibodies: B cells and T cells mediate immunity to COVID-19

The receptor binding domain of the viral spike protein is an immunodominant and highly specific target of antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 patients

Rapid isolation and profiling of a diverse panel of human monoclonal antibodies targeting the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein

Persistence and decay of human antibody responses to the receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in COVID-19 patients

SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody responses are more robust in patients with severe disease

Dynamics of neutralizing antibody titers in the months after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection

A longitudinal study of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients reveals a high correlation between neutralizing antibodies and COVID-19 severity

Longitudinal observation and decline of neutralizing antibody responses in the three months following SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans

The ORF8 protein of SARS-CoV-2 mediates immune evasion through potently downregulating MHC-I. bioRxiv 2020

A unique view of SARS-CoV-2 through the lens of ORF8 protein

Structure of SARS-CoV-2 ORF8, a rapidly evolving immune evasion protein

Serological surveillance of SARS-CoV-2: six-month trends and antibody response in a cohort of public health workers

Persistence of antibody and cellular immune responses in COVID-19 patients over nine months after infection

Neutralizing antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic COVID-19 is persistent and critical for survival

Neutralizing antibody titres in SARS-CoV-2 infections

Persistence of SARS-CoV-2-specific B and T cell responses in convalescent COVID-19 patients 6-8 months after the infection

Profile of specific antibodies to SARS-CoV-2: the first report

IgA dominates the early neutralizing antibody response to SARS-CoV-2

Time series analysis and mechanistic modelling of heterogeneity and sero-reversion in antibody responses to mild SARSCoV-2 infection

Antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 decline, but do not disappear for several months

Functional SARS-CoV-2-specific immune memory persists after mild COVID-19

Robust neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 infection persist for months

Antibody dynamics to SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic COVID-19 infections

Neutralizing antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in a COVID-19 recovered patient cohort and their implications

Clinical and immunological assessment of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections

Prolonged evolution of the human B cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection

Long-term persistence of RBD + memory B cells encoding neutralizing antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 infection

SARS-CoV-2 specific memory B cells frequency in recovered patient remains stable while antibodies decay over time

Evolution of antibody immunity to SARS-CoV-2

Immunological memory to SARS-CoV-2 assessed for up to 8 months after infection

Switched and unswitched memory B cells detected during SARS-CoV-2 convalescence correlate with limited symptom duration

Expansion of atypical memory B cells is a prominent feature of COVID-19

Influenza A reinfection in sequential human challenge: implications for protective immunity and "universal" vaccine development

Distinct cellular immune profiles in the airways and blood of critically ill patients with COVID-19

B cell analysis in SARS-CoV-2 versus malaria: Increased frequencies of plasmablasts and atypical memory B cells in COVID-19

Profiling B cell immunodominance after SARS-CoV-2 infection reveals antibody evolution to non-neutralizing viral targets

Airway memory CD4(+) T cells mediate protective immunity against emerging respiratory coronaviruses

T cell responses are required for protection from clinical disease and for virus clearance in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-infected mice

Virus-specific memory CD8 T cells provide substantial protection from lethal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection

Longitudinal characteristics of lymphocyte responses and cytokine profiles in the peripheral blood of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients

Pathological inflammation in patients with COVID-19: a key role for monocytes and macrophages

COVID-19: immunopathology and its implications for therapy

Single-cell landscape of bronchoalveolar immune cells in patients with COVID-19

Expanding roles for CD4+ T cells in immunity to viruses

CD8(+) T cells: foot soldiers of the immune system

Adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19

Targets of T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in humans with COVID-19 disease and unexposed individuals

Comprehensive analysis of T cell immunodominance and immunoprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 epitopes in COVID-19 cases

Antigenspecific adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in acute COVID-19 and associations with age and disease severity

Phenotype and kinetics of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome

Robust T cell immunity in convalescent individuals with asymptomatic or mild COVID-19

Cellular immunity in COVID-19 convalescents with PCR-confirmed infection but with undetectable SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG

IL-6 and CD8+ T cell counts combined are an early predictor of in-hospital mortality of patients with COVID-19

Early induction of functional SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells associates with rapid viral clearance and mild disease in COVID-19 patients

Reduction and functional exhaustion of T cells in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19

SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls

Cellular immune correlates of protection against symptomatic pandemic influenza

T follicular helper cells in germinal center B cell selection and lymphomagenesis

Humoral and circulating follicular helper T cell responses in recovered patients with COVID-19

The importance and challenges of identifying SARS-CoV-2 reinfections

At what times during infection is SARS-CoV-2 detectable and no longer detectable using RT-PCR-based tests? A systematic review of individual participant data

Interpreting diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2

Low incidence of reinfection with endemic coronaviruses diagnosed by real-time PCR

Case fatality ratio of pandemic influenza

Comparing SARS-CoV-2 with SARS-CoV and influenza pandemics

Global burden of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in young children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Epidemiology, genetic recombination, and pathogenesis of coronaviruses

Variation in frequency of natural reinfection with influenza A viruses

Novel correlates of protection against pandemic H1N1 influenza A virus infection

Epidemiology of influenza virus reinfection: a retrospective analysis of a nine-year influenza surveillance data

SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.351 and P.1 escape from neutralizing antibodies

Multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants escape neutralization by vaccine-induced humoral immunity

National Study Group for COVID-19 Vaccination. Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 vaccine against the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants

SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.617 is resistant to bamlanivimab and evades antibodies induced by infection and vaccination

SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617 emergence and sensitivity to vaccine-elicited antibodies

Reduced sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 variant Delta to antibody neutralization

Safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: a preliminary report of a phase 1/2, single-blind, randomised controlled trial

Evidence for antibody as a protective correlate for COVID-19 vaccines

Immunological mechanisms of vaccine-induced protection against COVID-19 in humans

Assessment of novel vaccination regimens using viral vectored liver stage malaria vaccines encoding ME

Safety and immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine administered in a prime-boost regimen in young and old adults (COV002): a singleblind, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial

Effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccines against the B.1.617.2 (delta) variant

BNT162b2 induces SARS-CoV-2-neutralising antibodies and T cells in humans

Safety and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 vaccine in older adults

Heterologous vaccination regimens with self-amplifying RNA and adenoviral COVID vaccines induce robust immune responses in mice

Paucity and discordance of neutralising antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 VOCs in vaccinated immunodeficient patients and health-care workers in the UK

Impact and effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths following a nationwide vaccination campaign in Israel: an observational study using national surveillance data

Short-term impact of nursing home SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations on new infections, hospitalizations, and deaths

Correlates of protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection

Correlates of vaccine-induced protection against SARS-CoV-2. Vaccines (Basel) 2021

T-cell and antibody responses to first BNT162b2 vaccine dose in previously SARS-CoV-2-infected and infection-naive UK healthcare workers: a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study

Antibody responses to the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2

What is the evidence to support a correlate of protection for measles? A systematic review

Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern

Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 vaccine against the B.1.351 variant

Novavax COVID-19 vaccine demonstrates 89.3% efficacy in UK phase 3 trial

Efficacy of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern 202012/01 (B.1.1.7): an exploratory analysis of a randomised controlled trial

Novavax offers first evidence that COVID vaccines protect people against variants

Neutralizing antibody levels are highly predictive of immune protection from symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection

Distinct antibody and memory B cell responses in SARS-CoV-2 naïve and recovered individuals following mRNA vaccination

Safety and efficacy of singledose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine against Covid-19

SARS-CoV-2 vaccine breakthrough infections are asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic and are infrequently transmitted

Antibody resistance of SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.351 and B.1.1.7

Deep mutational scanning of SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain reveals constraints on folding and ACE2 binding

SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern partially escape humoral but not T-cell responses in COVID-19 convalescent donors and vaccinees

Impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants on the total CD4+ and CD8+ T cell reactivity in infected or vaccinated individuals

CD8+ T-cell responses in COVID-19 convalescent individuals target conserved epitopes from multiple prominent SARS-CoV-2 circulating variants

Escape of SARS-CoV-2 501Y.V2 from neutralization by convalescent plasma

mRNA vaccine-elicited antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and circulating variants

Resistance of SARS-CoV-2 variants to neutralization by monoclonal and serum-derived polyclonal antibodies

Vaccine-induced immunity provides more robust heterotypic immunity than natural infection to emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern

Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 pseudovirus by BNT162b2 vaccineelicited human sera

Vaccine breakthrough infections with SARS-CoV-2 variants

Evidence for increased breakthrough rates of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern in BNT162b2-mRNA-vaccinated individuals

Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections in prison after vaccination

Vaccine breakthrough infections with SARS-CoV-2 variants

The evolutionary dynamics of endemic human coronaviruses

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in IBD: more pros than cons

Concerns about SARS-CoV-2 evolution should not hold back efforts to expand vaccination

Covid-19: Millions could be offered booster vaccinations from September

Covid-19 booster vaccines: what we know and who's doing what

Viral loads of deltavariant SARS-CoV2 breakthrough infections following vaccination and booster with the BNT162b2 vaccine

SARS-CoV-2 neutralization with BNT162b2 vaccine dose 3

The Lancet Infectious Diseases. COVID-19 vaccine equity and booster doses

COVID-19 hospital admissions and deaths after BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccinations in 2·57 million people in Scotland (EAVE II): a prospective cohort study

Effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine up to 6 months in a large integrated health system in the USA: a retrospective cohort study

Risk factors and disease profile of post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infection in UK users of the COVID Symptom Study app: a prospective, community-based, nested, case-control study

Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 through the postpandemic period

GM is supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (London Interdisciplinary Doctoral Training Programme funding; grant number BB/M009513/1), and was, at the time of writing, supported by the UK Department of Health and Social Care. The funders had no involvement in the writing, analysis, or interpretation of results, or the decision to submit for publication. No payment was received from a pharmaceutical company or other agency directly related to the writing of this manuscript.