key: cord-0962067-bwph0jp1 authors: Mellins, Claude A.; Mayer, Laurel E.S.; Glasofer, Deborah R.; Devlin, Michael J.; Albano, Anne Marie; Nash, Sara Siris; Engle, Erin; Cullen, Colleen; Ng, Warren Y.K.; Allman, Anna; Fitelson, Elizabeth Murphy; Vieira, Aaron; Remien, Robert H.; Malone, Patrice; Wainberg, Milton L.; Baptista-Neto, Lourival title: Supporting the well-being of health care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic: The CopeColumbia response date: 2020-09-09 journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.08.013 sha: 86b05c1875eeff780b93ce06c438f0f6a5e117f2 doc_id: 962067 cord_uid: bwph0jp1 OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 is an international public health crisis, putting substantial burden on medical centers and increasing the psychological toll on health care workers (HCW). METHODS: This paper describes [Masked2], a peer support program developed by faculty in a large Urban Medical Center's Department of Psychiatry to support emotional well-being and enhance the professional resilience of HCW. RESULTS: Grounded in evidence-based clinical practice and research, peer support was offered in three formats: groups, individual sessions, and town halls. Also, psychoeducational resources were centralized on a website. A Facilitator's Guide informed group and individual work by including: (1) emotional themes likely to arise (e.g., stress, anxiety, trauma, grief, and anger) and (2) suggested facilitator responses and interventions, drawing upon evidence-based principles from peer support, stress and coping models, and problem-solving, cognitive behavioral, and acceptance and commitment therapies. Feedback from group sessions was overwhelmingly positive. Approximately 1/3 of individual sessions led to treatment referrals. CONCLUSIONS: Lessons learned include: (1) there is likely an ongoing need for both well-being programs and linkages to mental health services for HCW, (2) the workforce with proper support, will emerge emotionally resilient, and (3) organizational support for programs like [Masked2] is critical for sustainability. prevention of burnout, acute stress disorder, and depression. Identification and referral of those in need of mental health treatment became a secondary outcome. Three categories of service were developed. 1) Peer Support Groups are brief (30 minute), department/division-specific structured sessions, delivered virtually. Although initially focused on attending physicians and residents, they quickly expanded to include all [Masked] clinical and non-clinical staff. A subset of groups were designed to target leaders in recognition of their unique stressors and their impact on the well-being of their teams. All groups offered a safe space in which to discuss challenges, promote team support, and present resilienceenhancing strategies from evidence-based treatments, particularly CBT and group problemsolving interventions. 2) One-to-One Peer Support Sessions (20 minutes) were also conducted. The goal and format of these sessions was similar to the groups with a brief discussion of challenges, followed by brainstorming around coping strategies and resilience. The individual format allowed more personalized discussion; facilitators could conduct brief screenings if significant distress was revealed, with referrals and linkage to formal mental health treatment. 3) To accommodate larger audiences and departmental needs, a series of Grand Rounds and Town Halls were also developed (for the purpose of this paper, we will refer to these collectively as "Town Halls"). Town Halls were 30-60 minute virtually-presented talks, followed by Q&A, focusing on topics such as managing stress and anxiety, trauma, loss and grief, and strategies for supporting self-care and emotional well-being. For 24/7 access to support and resources, a Announcements were sent via email to: 1) department chairs, who were encouraged to share the information with their faculty and staff; 2) the Graduate Medical Education (GME) office, who disseminated the information to program directors and trainees; and 3) faculty invested in promoting wellness. Contact information and the weekly schedule with the hours for the one-to-one Peer Support Calls were also available on the website. As the Peer Support Groups were the most highly utilized [Masked2] services, we herein describe their evolution and the accompanying Facilitator's Guide in greater detail. Groups were initially led by 11 [masked] Department of Psychiatry faculty: 5 psychiatrists and 6 psychologists. Additional facilitators were added with increasing group requests. Each group had a similar structure. Facilitators framed the session (5 minutes), encouraged participants to describe recent challenges (10 minutes), then transitioned to identifying ways to cultivate resilience, harnessing the power of the group to foster teamwork and community coping and support (10 minutes), and concluded with appreciative inquiry (e.g., what went well this week, expressions of gratitude), a key component of resilience programs (5 minutes). The facilitator guide drew upon evidence-based principles from peer support interventions [22] , stress and coping models [23] , problem solving therapy [24] , cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) [25;26] , and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) [27] . Facilitators were encouraged to J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f not pathologize group members' experiences, but rather to acknowledge the exceptional circumstances of COVID-19, normalize and accept a range of feelings, provide opportunities to process those feelings, and identify coping strategies and examples of resilience. Support groups for leadership also provided space for discussing the challenges of supporting the well-being and performance of faculty and staff. Specific examples of techniques used in relationship to identified stressors/challenges are presented in Table 1 . In weekly peer supervision, facilitators had the opportunity to share experiences and seek guidance about navigating complex issues (e.g., managing anger). These sessions also provided support for facilitators and modeled some of the peer support functions of [Masked2] . Finally, the supervision sessions allowed expert consultations from [Masked] faculty on topics such as trauma, loss, and grief. Two mechanisms were established to collect group data on themes raised by participants, facilitator interventions, and the perceived impact of the program: 1) weekly peer supervision discussions provided qualitative information and clinical expert consensus, and 2) an anonymous, confidential and voluntary post-group brief Qualtrics survey (< 2 minutes) link was emailed to participants who volunteered their contact information. No personal identifying information was collected in the survey and no chart notes were taken on the groups. The Institutional Review Board did not consider this work in need of Human Subjects Review. Between March 23 and June 26th, 2020, 186 groups, consisting of 1-30 participants and representing 40 [Masked] departments were conducted (in addition to 43 Town Halls, with over J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f 1,500 participants in total, and 141 One-to-One calls). Although initially presented as single sessions, group participants and facilitators determined the need/desire for additional meetings, which ultimately ranged from 1 to 13; 30 groups met once, 22 groups met 2-4 times and 9 groups met > 5 times. Among physician groups, faculty and residents mostly met separately. Across [Masked2] services, thematic similarities emerged, with suggested strategies for coping evolving with the pandemic. Between March and June, increasing case rates, [Masked] caseloads and deaths during the height of the pandemic, and post surge experiences demarcated different phases of experience. For ease of presentation, we present key issues/themes and facilitator responses in the text and in Table 1 , organized by three phases: (1) the pandemic begins, (2) the surge, and (3) the decline and recovery. Some HCW segregated themselves from family members, increasing isolation and decreasing social support. As "the surge" approached and talk increased of redeployment to the "front lines", so too did anticipatory anxiety and fear about: a) competence to serve in new roles with J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f limited training; b) rapid increases in patient volume and associated demands; c) insufficient PPE; and d) possible rationing of care with resulting ethical dilemmas [21] . The [masked] facilitator guide that emerged during this phase was a collaborative effort by the [masked2] team, experienced in clinical research and service delivery. Recognizing the need for relatively brief approaches, the team identified concepts grounded in evidence-based research and practice, distilling techniques and strategies of high utility that were pragmatic, flexible and easily adaptable for a range of needs and clinical issues. Topics included: anxiety [28;29] , trauma [30] , stress [31] , and coping during extraordinary events (pandemics, natural disasters, and man-made events) [32;33;34] . The facilitator guide also required a specific focus on supporting and preventing burnout in HCW and first-responders [33;35-37] . Group facilitators employed evidence-based strategies for coping including labeling and validating emotions to normalize and make space for a range of reactions including fear, anxiety, frustration, guilt, and anger. Principles from CBT for anxiety were reinforced with emphasis on controllability [25;26] . Key components of ACT including accepting the human condition and identifying and recommitting to professional values [27] , reinforcing peer or social support, and reminding HCW that they were not alone were also critical during these sessions. Practical information supporting self-care including managing sleep, exercise, nutrition, and maintaining routines and recreation was provided. Facilitators explicitly identified participants' expressions of their own resilience (Table 1) . With the surge, many HCW were exposed to or infected by COVID-19, requiring J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f quarantine and self-isolation. Others worked remotely due to personal risk or being considered "non-essential" HCW. Feelings of guilt and helplessness related to not being on the frontlines emerged. The daily 7 PM cheering for HCW that quickly established itself as a hallmark of NYC's gratitude, while meaningful for some, became a source of guilt for others struggling to live up to professional ideals. For some, there was also a loss of professional role, purpose, and value. In the Emergency Department (ED) and ICUs, the volume, frequency, and intensity of death was overwhelming. Themes of grief, loss, and trauma loomed large due to the severity of illness and volume of patient deaths and compounded by personal losses of family members and friends. Some HCW expressed anger, feelings of moral distress as healers without known treatments or ways to prevent so many deaths, or feeling numb. HCW became liaisons to patients' families, holding communication devices that enabled loved ones to talk to patients, establish healthcare directives, and sometimes say goodbye. Pre-COVID-19, HCW provided families with privacy for these conversations. During COVID-19, HCW often provided the only link between families and patients. HCW described these moments as excruciatingly sad, but also deeply meaningful. During the NYC pandemic's peak, HCW expressed thoughts related to the power of the team and glimmers of hope. Volunteer HCW arrived from other states to assist. ICU beds within the hospital were doubled, field hospitals were rapidly constructed, and PPE and ventilators became available. For many, the anticipatory anxiety prior to redeployment proved worse than actual assignments. For example, psychiatry residents sent to the ICU served as liaisons between the clinical team and patients' family, and some radiologists became x-ray technicians. For others, re-deployment was more stressful than anticipated. Pediatric HCW, largely spared from treating children with COVID-19, were redeployed to care for severely ill, adult COVID-19 ICU J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f patients. Yet, HCW expressed how these challenging experiences were also deeply meaningful; feelings of pride emerged through the collaborations and sense of staff unity. Lastly were challenges for staff who also had young children, or children at home due to school closures. There was stress around balancing work, home schooling or childcare, new technology (on-line classes and meetings), and the lack of boundaries and structures that normally exist. Guided by research on the treatment of complicated grief [38] , HCW were taught to normalize the range of emerging emotions and consider "dosing their grief," choosing when to pause and acknowledge waves of feelings and when to stay the course with a task before returning to self-care. In addition, recommitting to professional values including the decision to enter the healthcare field, discussing meaningful aspects of work, and countering COVID-19induced isolation by actively connecting to others were reinforced as ways to enhance resilience. The concept of resilience was presented not as "snapping back" to how you were before the pandemic, but rather, learning to integrate the experiences into identity and grow [39] . Finally, validating everyone's role and contributions to [Masked's] efforts became an important facilitator role as we reframed the meaning of providing "help" to the medical center. Though not everyone can or should be on the front lines, all team members bring value to the effort. [Masked] is currently in this stage. As the surge has ebbed, the institution, like the community, is reorienting towards re-opening and the future. But for those still on the front lines, Along with the relief of surviving the NYC pandemic peak, previously suppressed emotions of grief, loss, and trauma have emerged. Disillusionment is described, as the strong sense of teamwork experienced during the surge gave way to longstanding departmental rivalries. A high level of anger has been noted, particularly directed toward systems that were seen as inadequate in the protection of patients and providers. Finally, as described by others [40] , increased distress accompanied the recognition that COVID-19 infection and mortality rates were highest in racial and ethnic minorities, reflecting pre-existing racial and social disparities in healthcare. Relatedly, in the wake of the protests and social unrest related to societal racism, there was much discussion about the destructive effects and the emotional toll of structural racism on providers, particularly providers of color. All of the strategies employed in previous stages are also used in this phase. Additionally, facilitators are emphasizing self-and team-based advocacy in acknowledging systemic problems and brainstorming/facilitating communication about those aspects providers can effectively J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f change moving forward. Groups for leaders/managers encourage participants to think about how they can improve team cohesion (e.g., building connections, asking check-in questions, creating space to express gratitude for colleagues, highlighting team accomplishments), given that this dynamic reduces stress by fostering interpersonal warmth, empathetic understanding, feelings of belonging, and mutual support among team members. Screening for burnout, anxiety, depression, and trauma reactions and connecting HCW to mental health care continue to be a focus. "Stage X" can occur at any time. For [Masked], a critical event occurred shortly after the pandemic peak--the death by suicide of a beloved colleague known to many on the front lines. 42] . Opt-out one-to-one sessions became critical confidential spaces for HCW to express a range of emotions, including grief, and for destigmatizing mental health treatment. During the group, facilitators asked participants who were willing to take a post-group survey to enter their email address in the chat function of the Zoom or WebEx platform. Survey links were sent to those who volunteered their email addresses. In some cases, a team leader/manager sent the link to participants. Across all weeks up through June 26, 124 participants completed the survey. Due to the anonymity of the survey, we cannot identify how many unique participants this represents. The average emotional distress rating during the initial phase of the pandemic (3/23-04/03, N=25) was 2.6+0.9 (range 0-4) with 68% of participants rating their emotional distress as "quite a bit or extremely." Perceived helpfulness of the group was high 2.9+1.0 (range 1-4) with 76% rating helpfulness as "quite a bit" or "extremely." During the last weeks (05/26-06/26, N=25), average emotional distress had significantly decreased (2.0+0.8, p=0.03), but helpfulness of the group remained unchanged (2.5+1.1, p=0.29). All respondents with the exception of two reported that they would recommend the group to a colleague. Among the entire sample (N=124), 72% of respondents acknowledged exposure to COVID-19, 36% said they had been tested and 11% reported testing positive. While individuals were concerned about their own health, their primary concern was the health of family members (Table 2 ). [Masked2] groups have been positioned to offer a safe, supportive space for individuals to give voice to their concerns. Importantly, a key lesson of [Masked2] has been that by having mental health providers as facilitators, there exists the capacity to recognize and respond when a participant might need a higher level of mental health care. In turn, it is hoped that experiencing mental health providers as peers contributes to the de-stigmatization of mental health treatment. This paper describes the development and work of [Masked2] with some pilot survey data on perceived helpfulness. Given that [Masked2] was developed during a rapidly evolving situation, we prioritized addressing clinical needs over research methods. Thus, our program evaluation has several limitations. Because of our choice to prioritize anonymity of participants, we only have data on those who voluntarily provided email addresses. Participants in recurring groups may have completed the survey multiple times. Therefore, we don't know the universe of potential respondents and cannot calculate the response rate. We believe there are several future directions for this work. First, it would be valuable to more rigorously evaluate the impact of the [Masked2] program on HCW outcomes, and to advance our understanding of the most helpful services and mechanisms. Preliminary survey data were encouraging, suggesting that our intervention was perceived as "helpful." However, we did not objectively or systematically assess changes in psychological well-being pre and post intervention, thus cannot definitively comment on the impact of [Masked2]. In assembling our peer support group model, we drew from multiple evidenced-based treatments. While grounded in data-driven principles, we cannot identify which components may have been the most helpful, for example, the cognitive reframing approach drawn from CBT, or the acceptance of focusing on what one can control from ACT. Psychological first aid (PFA) principles are consistent with many of our recommended interventions, but whether our program offers distinct benefit compared to PFA is unknown. Future studies on the efficacy, cost effectiveness and mechanisms of action of programs such as [Masked2] are critical to the field given the current limited evidence base. Second, there is a need to address known barriers and promoters of HCW seeking mental health treatment, including time constraints, costs, stigma and career concerns [44;45] . We aimed J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f to address these barriers by offering brief services, available at no cost, administered virtually, prioritizing anonymity and voluntariness. To decrease the stigma related to help-seeking, we emphasized that the virus novelty and significant unknowns (e.g., treatment, spectrum of symptom presentation, etc.) made asking for help necessary, and not a sign of weakness. Despite these efforts, there were likely many in need who did not participate. Fourth, there are likely differences between virtual and In-person sessions that we need to understand. Pre-COVID-19, telehealth platforms were slowly being adopted, with moderate pockets of resistance from the behavioral health community. However, with the onset of COVID-19 and sheltering-in-place policies, rapid implementation occurred. It is likely that there are important clinical observations (e.g., body language) or interventions that might have occurred if our groups had been in-person yet were missed because participants were not in full view or did not use video. We cannot know whether these missed opportunities contributed to a changed outcome. Although we were not presented with an acutely distraught or suicidal participant and we did have safety plans in place for addressing suicidality/self-harm, it gives us pause to think about how issues of safety can be effectively addressed virtually. Studies of telehealth platforms, including telepsychiatry are emerging [34;46;47] and needed to inform future initiatives. Nonetheless, the outpouring of peer support, team-work and gratitude that has helped HCW not J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f just to survive but thrive has been humbling for the [Masked2] team. With the increased focus on HCW mental health [48;49] , the team believes this pandemic has highlighted an ongoing need. To this point, the issues of sustainability are critical to address. The [Masked2] program was developed and supported through extensive and persistent efforts by faculty who volunteered their time during the shut down of the pandemic. But with the re-opening of the medical center, time for these volunteer activities will be greatly reduced. Yet the need for HCW wellness activities and mental health support will persist and even increase, requiring an organizational investment to sustain these efforts. Moreover, other barriers remain related to mental health stigma and reluctance to seek help specifically among HCW and physicians, such as schedules that limit time for self-care, and cultures that may not focus on the role of emotions, asking for help, or the importance of compassion for each other. We have an opportunity and responsibility to prevent the "parallel pandemic of emotional harm" (Dzau and colleagues, 2020) and promote the well-being of our health care providers [48] . We would like to thank [MASKED] We also are grateful for the input and guidance of additional psychiatry faculty who assisted with Recognizing not everyone can serve on the front-lines. 4) Support: Critical to coping is social support and reminding HCWs that they are not alone; use of others in the peer groups allowed a focus on this strategy. 5) Self-care. Like oxygen masks on an airplane, HCWs must prioritize their own self care in order to care for their patients. This is not selfish, but essential. Facilitators respected the diversity of needs of HCWs, also recommend limiting news exposure and stressing the importance of sleep and nutrition, 6 In addition to prior strategies, facilitators offered novel strategies to address following: 1) Expected Responses to Grief and Trauma. Education about the grief response or the trauma response-normalizing the breath of emotions and range of responses that could be experienced. 2) Safely Riding out Waves of Emotions. Giving permission to "dose grief" and choose when to pause and acknowledge waves of feelings and when to stay the course with a task. 3) Recommitting to Self-care. 4) Knowing and Owning Professional Values. In the context of so much illness and death, identifying aspects of the job that are particularly meaningful and remembering why one chose medicine as a career. 5) Building Community. Countering COVID-19 induced isolation by actively connecting to others and using the groups to demonstrate how team sharing can promote individual and group emotional strength and wellness. 6) Resilience. It became important to remind participants that resilience does not mean "snapping back" to how you were, but learning to integrate the experiences into who you are and growing with it, as well as recognizing individual strengths/assets. 7) Reframing What Providing "Help" To The Medical Center Means. Not everyone can or should be on the front lines. There are many tasks that medical centers need completed to stay afloat and rotations are needed on the front lines as well as behind or away from the medical units. Those with medical conditions for whom the risk of illness outweighed the benefit needed to serve in different but still important capacities. Validating everyone's role and naturally occurring peer support became an important task of the facilitators. 2) Frustration and fear related to social and public health issues in the country. This included the politicizing of the virus; lack of national consistency in implementing recommended containment strategies for the public; delayed trauma and grief reactions; fear and anxiety related to civil unrest and racism. could do to address and change problems on a local (i.e., in a division or unit) and systemic level (department or center-wide) became important. 3) Giving Voice to Stress-related Racial and Social Injustice Issues. Facilitators framed groups as safe spaces to discuss not just COVID, but also experiences of racial and social injustice, and related coping strategies 3) Referrals. Provided resources as requested related to grief, trauma, loss, and a range of mental health problems that may have existed prior to COVID, but were exacerbated by the significant trauma. Referrals for mental health treatment were made as needed. Suicide of a HCW. Grief, sadness, shock, guilt, and anger. In response to loss of a colleague, facilitators worked to distill psychoeducation to HCW and implement evidence-based strategies 1) Psychoeducation, including information about suicide risk, difficulty with prediction and prevention, and specific data regarding HCW/physicians being at increased risk of suicide. 2) Stress-Diathesis Model of Suicide, including biological vulnerability. 3) Management of Grief and Bereavement Reactions 4) Acknowledging and Reframing Guilt ("What did I miss") and anger ("Why wasn't this person helped by the system") 5) Addressed Stigma related to help seeking of J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f dedication and service to patient care and making a difference during this pandemic. 6. References 1. World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. 2020 Coronavirus Resource Center. COVID-19 Dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU) Coronavirus COVID-19 global cases COVID-19 data COVID-19), Cases, Data & Surveillance, Cases & Deaths in the US COVID-19), COVID-19 in Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response Attending to the emotional well-being of the health care workforce in a New York City health system during the COVID-19 pandemic Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019 Mental health-care for medical staff in China during the COVID-19 outbreak Mental health of young physicians in China during the novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 outbreak Psychological distress and psychiatric disorder after natural disasters: systematic review and meta-analysis Self-enhancement among high-exposure survivors of the September 11th terrorist attack: resilience or social maladjustment? A prospective examination of delayed onset PTSD secondary to motor vehicle accidents The human capacity to thrive in the face of potential trauma Mental health response to community disasters: a systematic review Investigating the psychiatric lessons of war and J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Journal Pre-proof pattern of preventable wartime behavioral health crises Loss, trauma, and human resilience: have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? Am Psychol Resilience in the face of loss and potential trauma Supporting health care workers in distress while avoiding "trauma" narratives. Psychiatric Times Posttraumatic stress, depression, stigma, and barriers to care among U.S. Army healthcare providers Compassion fatigue and secondary traumatization: Provider self care on intensive care units for children Efficacy of peer support interventions for depression: a meta-analysis Key reading in social psychology. Motivational science: Social and personality perspectives The Jossey-Bass social and behavioral science series. Problem-solving therapy Psychological treatments Treatments that work. Mastering your fears and phobias: therapist guide Acceptance and commitment therapy: an experiential approach to behavioral change Mastery of Your Anxiety and Panic: Therapist Guide Mastery of Your Anxiety and Worry: Therapist Guide Prolonged Exposure Therapy for PTSD: Emotional Processing of Traumatic Experiences -Therapist Guide Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders: Therapist Guide Cognitive-Behavioral Stress Management for Individuals Living with HIV: Facilitator Guide Coping with Chronic Illness: A Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Approach for Adherence and Depression, Therapist Guide Telepsychotherapy during a pandemic: A traumatic stress perspective The value of psychological flexibility: Examining psychological mechanisms underpinning a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for burnout Exercise for Mood and Anxiety Disorders: Therapist Guide The link between stress, well-being, and psychological flexibility during an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy self-help intervention Optimizing treatment of complicated grief: a randomized clinical trial Resilience: The Science of Mastering Life's Greatest Challenges, 1 st Edition The COVID-19 pandemic: a call to action to identify and address racial and ethnic disparities The Need for Innovation in Health Care Systems to Improve Suicide Prevention Racism and discrimination in COVID-19 responses. The Lancet Utilization and barriers to mental health services among depressed medical interns: a prospective multisite study MD Depressed Medical Students' Use of Mental Health Services and Barriers to Use Recommendations for Using Clinical Video Telehealth with Patients at High Risk for Suicide Preventing a parallel pandemic -a national strategy to protect clinicians' well-being Understanding and addressing sources of anxiety among health care professionals during the COVID-19 Pandemic Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders: Therapist Guide The Jossey-Bass social and behavioral science series. Problem-solving therapy Acceptance and commitment therapy: an experiential approach to behavioral change Mastery of Your Anxiety and Worry: Therapist Guide. New Why people die by suicide Suicide and suicide risk Toward a biosignature for suicide Suicide among physicians and healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis All of the authors for this paper were involved in all aspects of the manuscript development and writing. The authors were all involved in the CopeColumbia program and the development of this paper and in this role worked collectively on the paper. The Co-first Authors took leadership and full responsibility for overseeing the process and ensuring that all authors met criteria for the journal's description of authors.J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f