key: cord-0959862-xux6wpln authors: Patoulias, D.; Boulmpou, A.; Imprialos, K.; Stavropoulos, K.; Papadopoulos, C.; Doumas, M. title: Meta-analysis evaluating the risk of respiratory tract infections and acute respiratory distress syndrome with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in cardiovascular outcome trials: Useful implications for the COVID-19 pandemic() date: 2021-06-05 journal: Rev Clin Esp (Barc) DOI: 10.1016/j.rceng.2021.04.002 sha: b78f6296edf7da0f23f5cedd2b3b4c3a20b769be doc_id: 959862 cord_uid: xux6wpln Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are at increased risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and related mortality. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1-RAs) have significant cardiovascular and renal benefits for patients with T2DM and related comorbidities. Their anti-inflammatory properties could be beneficial in these patients. This work provides less-biased estimates regarding the risk for respiratory tract infections and acute respiratory distress syndrome by performing the first significant meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials in the literature. Notably, GLP-1-RAs do not seem to increase the risk for respiratory tract infection, pneumonia, or acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with T2DM and cardiovascular comorbidities. Brief original Metaanálisis para evaluar el riesgo de infecciones respiratorias y síndrome de distrés respiratorio del adulto con los agonistas del receptor del péptido similar al glucagón tipo 1 en los ensayos de seguridad cardiovascular: consecuencias útiles para la pandemia de Meta-analysis evaluating the risk of respiratory tract infections and acute respiratory distress syndrome with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in cardiovascular outcome trials: Useful implications for the COVID-19 pandemic Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1-RAs) provide significant cardiovascular and renal benefits for patients with T2DM and related co-morbidities. They have therefore been proposed as a second-line treatment option, according to recent recommendations. 4 However, their continuation among patients with COVID-19 infection has been argued due to their potential to lead to dehydration, mainly in the context of gastrointestinal adverse events. 5 Their anti-inflammatory properties could prove beneficial for those patients, even though there are no studies so far addressing their efficacy in COVID-19 patients. 6,7 GLP-1-RAs have been shown to upregulate angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2); however, the clinical implications of this effect remain unclear. 8 We sought to provide the less biased effect estimates regarding the impact of this antidiabetic drug class on major outcomes of interest, namely upper and lower respiratory tract infection, viral infection, influenza, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), by pooling corresponding data from the relevant hallmark cardiovascular outcome trials. [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] Methods Two independent reviewers (D.P. and A.B.) extracted the data from the eligible reports (along with data provided in supplementary appendices and grey literature sources, mainly Clinicaltrials.gov) by using a pilot-tested data extraction form. As we assessed only dichotomous variables, differences were calculated with the use of risk ratio (RR), with 95% confidence interval (CI), after implementation of the Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) random effects formula. Statistical heterogeneity among studies was assessed by using I 2 statistics. Heterogeneity was considered to be low if I² was between 0% and 25%, moderate if I² was between 25% and 50%, or high if I² was greater than 75%. 16 All analyses were performed at the 0.05 significance level while undertaken with RevMan 5.3 software. 17 Two independent reviewers (D.P. and C.P.) assessed the quality of the included RCTs by using the Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0) for the primary safety outcomes, namely upper and lower respiratory tract infections. 18 Each domain was rated as low, unclear, or high risk of bias. The presence of adequate procedures in all domains rated a study as being of low risk of bias, while inadequate procedure in at least one domain rated a study as being of high risk of bias. Discrepancies between reviewers were solved by discussion, consensus, or arbitration by a third senior reviewer (M.D.). GLP-1-RA treatment resulted in a non-significant decrease in the risk for upper respiratory tract infection, equal to 19% (RR░=░0.81, 95% CI; 0.64 to 1.02, I 2 ░=░0%), as shown in Figure 1 All cardiovascular outcome trials except for the EXSCEL trial provided relevant numeric data concerning the incidence of upper and lower respiratory tract infections across the different treatment arms. Notably, GLP-1-RA treatment decreased the risk for influenza infection (RR░=░0.60, 95% CI; 0.32 to 1.12, I 2 ░=░0%), pneumonia (RR░=░0.89, 95% CI; 0.78 to 1.01, I 2 ░=░0%) and ARDS (RR░=░0.51, 95% CI; 0.13 to 2.08, I 2 ░=░0%), although none of the observed effects reached statistical significance. Finally, GLP-1RA treatment led to a nonsignificant increase in the risk of viral infection (RR░=░1.77, 95% CI; 0.65 to 4.80, I 2 ░=░0%). The risk of bias for each assessed domain and overall risk of bias was low across all selected trials. Unfortunately, EXSCEL trial's rating was not applicable for the primary safety outcome since trialists did not provide numeric data regarding the incidence of upper and lower respiratory tract infections across the two treatment arms (exenatide and placebo). Collectively, GLP-1-RAs do not seem to increase the risk for respiratory tract infection, pneumonia, or ARDS in patients with T2DM and cardiovascular co-morbidities. Therefore, they could be a safe treatment option for patients with COVID-19 disease. Well-designed, prospective trials will elucidate their place in managing hospitalized COVID-19 patients and whether they could provide additional benefits besides maintaining adequate glycemia. This study did not receive any type of funding. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Los autores declaran que no tienen conflictos de intereses. 2 Efecto del tratamiento con AR-GLP-1, en comparación con placebo, sobre el riesgo de infección de las vías respiratorias inferiores. Associations of type 1 and type 2 diabetes with COVID-19-related mortality in England: a wholepopulation study Risk factors for COVID-19-related mortality in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in England: a population-based cohort study Diabetes and COVID-19: A pooled analysis related to disease severity and mortality A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) [published correction appears in Diabetes Care Practical recommendations for the management of diabetes in patients with COVID-19 Hypothesized mechanisms explaining poor prognosis in type 2 diabetes patients with COVID-19: a review Treating type 2 diabetes in COVID-19 patients: the potential benefits of injective therapies Currently prescribed drugs in the UK that could upregulate or downregulate ACE2 in COVID-19 disease: a systematic review Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial Albiglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (Harmony Outcomes): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial Lixisenatide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome Oral Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Effects of Once-Weekly Exenatide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre TCC A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials