key: cord-0956814-pq5526m9 authors: Eghbali, Foolad; Bhahdoust, Mansour; Khanafshar, Elham; Pazouki, Abdolreza; Shahabi, Shahab; Kermansaravi, Mohammad title: Retroperitoneal duodenal perforation due to COVID-19: An extremely rare case report date: 2022-05-11 journal: Int J Surg Case Rep DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107191 sha: af13c04166dc77f80966e5354967443ec0e793b5 doc_id: 956814 cord_uid: pq5526m9 INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are the most common extrapulmonary presentation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. GI perforation may be an unusual manifestation of COVID-19 infection. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a 45-year-old man who presented with acute abdominal pain without any respiratory symptoms to our emergency department. Investigations revealed retroperitoneal duodenal perforation and fibrotic changes in lung bases. Laboratory findings demonstrated a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for COVID-19 and mild leukocytosis. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: COVID-19 related perforation of the retroperitoneal part of the duodenum is extremely rare, and to the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case. With increasing COVID-19 infection, we might see more cases of GI perforation. In the era of COVID-19 pandemic, any abdominal signs and symptoms should alert the clinicians to consider COVID-19 diagnosis in the differential. CONCLUSION: Conservative management with close monitoring, antibiotic therapy and serial examinations were completely successful. The patient's general condition improved, and he was discharged on day 7 of hospitalization. COVID-19 pandemic is the major disaster that human beings is confronted with in the last decade, with about 231 million affected patients and 4.76 million deaths until 27 September 2021 [1] . Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are the most prevalent extraperitoneal COVID-19 infection, with about 26.8% as a pooled analysis, including anorexia, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea, altered taste, and GI bleeding [2, 3] . There are a few reported cases of GI perforations due to . To the best of our knowledge, there have been no reports of retroperitoneal duodenal perforation due to inion. A 45-year-old man was admitted to our emergency ward with a chief complaint of sudden abdominal pain with maximum intensity in the epigastrium and right side of the abdomen. He was a smoker without any significant surgical and medical history except close contact with the COVID-19 patient at home. A physical exam revealed normal vital signs but a generalized abdominal tenderness and voluntary guarding. He was neither febrile nor dehydrated. Upright chest and abdominal X-rays were normal. Bilateral pulmonary fibrosis, predominantly at the bases, was found in High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) ( Figure 1 ). Lab tests showed a positive COVID-19 PCR test in 14 cycles for RdRp genes and 15 processes for N genes (Table 1) , mild leukocytosis, and negative urine toxicology (Table 2- Figure 2 ). Abdominal and pelvic Ultrasound was normal without any evidence of free fluid. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan with intravenous (IV) contrast demonstrated a contained J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f duodenal perforation with a current of fluid to retroperitoneal space till the right gutter ( Figure 3 ). Transit of the small intestine demonstrated a retroperitoneal leak from the second part of the duodenum toward the right paracolic gutter. Small intestine transit of contrast revealed leakage ( Figure 4 ). Closed monitoring with serial physical exams, repeat lab tests, and antibiotic therapy (according to our GI perforation protocols) was successful. He was free of pain after 48 hours. However, Covid-19 pulmonary signs and symptoms such as cough and mild dyspnea started on the second day of admission, which persuaded us to start antiviral therapy with Remdesivir (200 mg/IV loading dose and 100mg/IV daily for five days). After five days, the patient was recovered and tolerated oral (PO) intake and discharged after seven days of hospitalization without any consequences. The work has been reported in line with the SCARE 2020 criteria[5]. Although we can't suggest the Covid-19 infection as the risk factor for PPUD, our successful conservative approach may encourage colleagues to avoid early surgical approach in Covid-19 patients with contained GI perforation. In conclusion, we recommend evaluating each case individually to decide the best plan of treatment. Not commissioned, externally peer-reviewed -conflicts of interest : The authors declare that they have no competing interests. -sources of funding This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Iran University of medical science. Cycle threshold for RdRp genes 14 statement to this effect in a consent section at the end of the manuscript, as follows: "Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal on request". Patients have a right to privacy. Patients' and volunteers' names, initials, or hospital numbers should not be used. Images of patients or volunteers should not be used unless the information is essential for scientific purposes and explicit permission has been given as part of the consent. If such consent is made subject to any conditions, the Editor in Chief must be made aware of all such conditions. Even where consent has been given, identifying details should be omitted if they are not essential. If identifying characteristics are altered to protect anonymity, such as in genetic pedigrees, authors should provide assurance that alterations do not distort scientific meaning and editors should so note. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal. Please specify the contribution of each author to the paper, e.g. study concept or design, data collection, data analysis or interpretation, writing the paper, others, who have contributed in other ways, should be listed as contributors. All authors contributed to the all part of study such as 1) the conception and design of the study, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data, (2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, (3) final approval of the version to be submitted. In accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki 2013, the Editors of IJS Case Reports require that reports that are 'First in Man' studies should be registered prospectively and failing that retrospectively. There are many places to register your First in Man case report: • Clinicaltrials.govfor all human studiesfree • Chinese Clinical Trial Registry chictr.org.cnfor all human studies -free • Researchregistry.comfor all human studiescharge • ISRCTN.comfor all human studiescharge • There are many national registries approved by the UN that can be found here Elsevier does not support or endorse any registry. J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Name of the registry: 2. Unique identifying number or registration ID Hyperlink to your specific registration The following information is required for submission. Please note that failure to respond to these questions/statements will mean your submission will be returned. If you have nothing to declare in any of these categories, then this should be stated. All authors must disclose any financial and personal relationships with other people or organisations that could inappropriately influence (bias) their work. Examples of potential conflicts of interest include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding.The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare All sources of funding should be declared as an acknowledgement at the end of the text. Authors should declare the role of study sponsors, if any, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. If the study sponsors had no such involvement, the authors should so state.This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors Research studies involving patients require ethical approval. Please state whether approval or exemption has been given, name the relevant ethics committee and the state the reference number for their judgement. Please give a statement regarding ethnical approval that will be included in the publication of your article, if the study is exempt from ethnical approval in your institution please state this.Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal. Studies on patients or volunteers require ethics committee approval and fully informed written consent which should be documented in the paper.Authors must obtain written and signed consent to publish a case report from the patient (or, where applicable, the patient's guardian or next of kin) prior to submission. We ask Authors to confirm as part of the submission process that such consent has been obtained, and the manuscript must include a J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f The Guarantor is the one or more people who accept full responsibility for the work and/or the conduct of the study, had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish Dr.Foolad Eghbali Highlights 1. Retroperitoneal perforation of duodenum in COVID patients may occur rarely 2. Conservative management with close observation in these patients is feasible 3. CT scan and contrast study to roll out the generalized peritonitis are helpful J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f