key: cord-0954707-0ybimdwa
authors: Tener, Dafna; Marmor, Amitai; Katz, Carmit; Newman, Abbie; Silovsky, Jane; Shields, Jennifer; Tylor, Erin
title: How does COVID-19 impact intrafamilial child sexual abuse? Comparison analysis of reports by practitioners in Israel and the US
date: 2020-10-19
journal: Child Abuse Negl
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104779
sha: a68d3f372353f65ceaacb118e1548fb72872dfe3
doc_id: 954707
cord_uid: 0ybimdwa

BACKGROUND: There is consensus in child sexual abuse (CSA) literature that intrafamilial child sexual abuse (IFCSA) has a tremendous impact on children and families while simultaneously creating challenges for practitioners. COVID-19 impacted countries worldwide and generated a global crisis resulting in impacts on daily life, however, it’s effect on IFCSA is unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare professional perspectives and experiences working with IFCSA with respect to the context of the COVID-19 pandemic within the United States and Israel. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Participants were therapeutic, child welfare and legal professionals, who provided services to children involved in IFCSA. METHODS: This qualitative cross-cultural comparative study analyzes professional experiences of IFCSA during COVID-19 based on an open-ended questionnaire answered online, with 37 responses from the US and 23 responses from Israel. RESULTS: Findings reveal mostly negative changes in the dynamics of IFCSA families during COVID-19, including financial, environmental, and emotional hardships, as well as some positive changes in the relationships among family members. In terms of professional interventions, concerns were raised that COVID-19 has been detrimental to the disclosure of IFCSA, with plummeting child abuse reports. Further, risk and benefits of transferring to internet based or telephonic therapeutic interventions were shared. CONCLUSIONS: Governmental and community efforts are needed to develop a safety net of protective factors to reduce IFCSA risks and increase resiliency during the COVID-19 pandemic and future global crises. Moreover, enhanced strategies to accessing and supporting families remotely such as using technology could improve identification and response to IFCSA.

Intrafamilial child sexual abuse (IFCSA) by definition occurs within the family unit. This phenomenon has a tremendous impact on children and their families and poses unique challenges for practitioners. The current study was designed to examine how COVID-19 has impacted the dynamics and interventions with families in the context of IFCSA, from the experiences and perceptions of practitioners in the United States (US) and Israel.

Though prevalence rates vary widely, IFCSA is considered one of the most common forms of child sexual abuse (CSA), with particularly severe short-and long- abilities to meet their children's basic needs (Conger & Conger, 2002; Conrad-Hiebner & Byram, 2020) . The link between poverty and child maltreatment was discussed by various researchers (Doidge et al., 2017; Slack et al., 2011) , wherein food and housing insecurity are observed to contribute to child abuse and neglect (Marcal, 2018; Slack et al., 2011; Wood et al., 2012) . COVID-19 generated a worldwide economic crisis, with millions of people around the globe suddenly unemployed when restaurants, entertainment, and commercial venues were closed with little notice. Given the tremendous impact that COVID-19 has had on families worldwide there is a substantial risk for many to slide into poverty.

It is crucial to emphasize that not all family economic crises end with parents' inability to provide children with their basic needs; however, an economic crisis often negatively impacts the parents and entire family wellbeing with financial concerns tending to erode parents' mental health functioning (McConnell, Breitkreuz, & Savage, 2011) . Initial reports suggest that depression is rising immediately following the rapid global spread of COVID-19 . Such evidence of mental health J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f HOW DOES COVID-19 IMPACT INTRAFAMILIAL CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE? challenges is likely to translate into an escalation in the risk for any type of child maltreatment (Rodriguez, Smith, & Silvia, 2016; Stith et al., 2009) . Indeed, in a recent study it was revealed that parents who lost their jobs were more depressed, and if they had previously psychologically maltreated their children they were more likely to do so again during the pandemic (Lawson & Simon, 2020) . Another study conducted in India during COVID-19 found that families with children who were sexually abused prior to the pandemic (mostly from underprivileged sections of society) were having increased difficulties dealing with the aftermath of CSA due to a sudden loss of income and a lack of social support (Unni, 2020) . Social isolation. Adding to increased economic and mental health stressors, forced lockdown has created social isolation for many families. The social isolation generated in response to COVID-19 created a sudden absence of both formal and informal systems from the lives of families. The link between seclusion and child abuse has been repeatedly reported by researchers (Elliott, Cunningham, Linder, Colangelo & Gross, 2005) . In the context of the pandemic, in a paper reviewing clinical and empirical studies on abuse and neglect during epidemics and crises, the authors indicated that children in West Africa during the Ebola virus epidemic from 2014 to 2016 suffered from elevated rates of neglect and sexual abuse while schools were closed (Roje Đapić, Buljan Flander & Prijatelj, 2020). Examining this concept from a supportive perspective, Priel and Besser (2002) found parents' ability to access social, emotional, financial and in-kind assistance helped them to care for their children more effectively.

Research exploring constructs contributing to children's safety and risk factors has identified a number of relevant neighborhoodlevel factors (e.g., Leventhal & Brooks-Gunn, 2000; Ross & Mirowsky, 2009;  J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f HOW DOES COVID-19 IMPACT INTRAFAMILIAL CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE? Sampson, Morenoff, & Gannon-Rowley, 2002) . These factors are often characterized as being structure-or process-oriented. Structural traits include factors such as a number of single-parent households, or a number of households living in poverty.

Process-oriented constructs include items such as collective efficacy (Sampson, 2003; Sampson & Morenoff, 2004; Sampson, Raudenbush, & Earls, 1997) , social capital (Coleman, 1988; Putnam, 2001) , and neighborhood cohesion Silk, Sessa, Sheffield, Steinberg, Laurence, & Avenevoli, 2004) . In addition to having been associated with outcomes such as health (e.g., Browning & Cagney, 2003) and youth development (e.g., Leventhal & Brooks-Gunn, 2004) , these constructs have been associated with children's safety and wellbeing (for reviews, see Maguire-Jack, 2014) . Looking at these concepts in the context of CSA, studies have suggested that registered sex offenders are more likely to move into socially disadvantaged neighborhoods (e.g., Wang, Pei, Wu & Dillard, 2020), specifically neighborhoods with higher levels of social disorganization and lower levels of collective efficacy, which offer anonymity (Socia & Stamatel, 2012) . It is not clear yet how COVID-19 would relate to these neighborhood-level factors in the context of IFCSA.

Child protection in the context of COVID-19. COVID-19 and its lockdown response stress the need to look at potential effects on child protection, in both structural and process-oriented constructs. Child protection in the context of a global crisis such as COVID-19 involves the "prevention of and response to abuse, neglect, exploitation and violence against children" (Impacts of Pandemics and Epidemics on Child Protection Lessons Learned from a Rapid Review in the Context of COVID-19, 2020).

Child protection services provide support and care for both children and parents in routine times, however, COVID-19 generated an unforeseen enormous challenge to J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f HOW DOES COVID-19 IMPACT INTRAFAMILIAL CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE?   accepted protocols for systems and practitioners worldwide. During COVID-19 various   countries have reported on their attempts to innovate quickly (ISPCAN web resources) , however, no one knows for certain what can best support children and families given the heretofore never encountered risks and restrictions. Adding to this, child abuse reports worldwide may decrease during COVID-19, as systems shutdowns result in the inability of schools and other individuals who often unmask child abuse to safely see children and families and assess risks (De Cao & Sandner, 2020) . Data from international conflicts and disasters have in fact suggested a paradoxical decrease in child protection reporting rates, possibly due to one or a combination of stresses on frontline child protection workers, the child protection reporting system and physical (e.g. telecommunication) infrastructure issues (Teo & Griffiths,2020). Active steps by child protection services are necessary during COVID-19 in order to overcome the lockdown consequences for children (Katz, 2020) .

Pandemics such as COVID-19 damage the environment in which children live, therefore increasing their susceptibility to abuse, neglect, violence, exploitation, psychological distress and impaired development (NCA Engage, 2020) . Studies concerning the effects of the pandemic on abused children and adolescents worldwide are at initial stages. Exploring the way practitioners from both Israel and the US perceive and experience IFCSA in the context of COVID-19 is of interest given several dissimilarities between the two countries. The first difference relates to the family structure, which in the Israeli agency participating in this study is characterized with a higher percentage of biological parents than in the US agencies which have a higher percentage of families with step or adopted children.

Additionally, in Israel, the most common out-of-home placement is residential Thus, the current study was designed to examine the impact of COVID-19 on IFCSA and to compare Israel and US responses by analyzing perceptions of professionals intervening with IFCSA cases. The following questions were addressed:

(1) How did COVID-19 affect the dynamics of IFCSA families (already known to authorities) and intervention by those authorities? (2) how did characteristics and interventions of cases of IFCSA disclosed during COVID-19 differ from those cases disclosed prior to the pandemic? (3) how will COVID-19 affect reporting of IFCSA as well as future intervention with these families? The need to enhance the development of both a conceptual and an empirical framework for the understudied domain of IFCSA during COVID-19 was the rationale for the qualitative approach used in the current research.

Data collection consisted of two groups, Israeli participants and participants from the United States. The research team developed an open-ended questionnaire in Hebrew for the Israeli participants and in English for the US participants, guided by the key research questions which were marked from exploration.

The US sample consisted of 37 professionals, 32 (86.8%) women and 5 males (13.2%), all of whom had experience in the field of CSA. The participants' ages ranged from 25 to 73 years of age (m=43.5, sd=39). There was a wide range of experience in the field of CSA of the respondents, ranging between less than one year to 32 years (m=11.67, sd=9.5) of experience. Participants' professions were divided into three sectors: 21.7% therapeutic (clinical social workers, family therapists, psychologists, counselors, etc.); 64.9% child welfare (social work caseworkers, family advocate, outreach professional, etc.); and 13.5% legal (law enforcement, forensic interviewer, attorney, etc.).

The Israeli sample consisted of 23 professionals, 17 (73.9%) women and 6 males (26.1%), all of whom also had experience in the field of child sexual abuse. The Israeli participants' ages ranged from 27 to 67 years of age (m= 40.52, md=38), with experience ranging between one to 15 years (m=6.9, md=6.5). The professions of the participants were divided into two sectors: 65.2% therapeutic (clinical social workers, Respondents replied to the questionnaire during the month of May, 2020, and was distributed to participants via internet in both countries using online resources such as Facebook and WhatsApp, and professional mailing lists. Written explanation on the study was provided and after participants signed informed consent they were transferred to the questionnaire.

Approximately 10% of US participants were from areas where the lockdown at its most severe asked communities to stay 'safer at home.' The majority of US participants were under 'shelter at home' mandates which varied from 1-3 months' time, unless they were considered essential personnel. Law enforcement and CPS team members were always considered 'essential' personnel, while CAC staff designation varied based on the severity of the case. At the same time, similar to most of the US respondents, the Israel participants where under quarantine, and were required to stay and work at home. Contrary to the US, in Israel most of the CPS and therapeutic teams were not defined as essential workers and therefore the majority of them were not allowed to work during the forced quarantine between mid-March to April 19, only then they were redefined as essential workers. The work from home was done through web-based technology, and in most cases children and families were not seen in person. 

The data analysis in the current study was guided by a thematic analysis approach (Braun & Clarke, 2006) in order to analyze the narratives that were yielded from the questionnaires in both countries. This included several interrelated stages.

Before beginning the analysis, the researchers read the data several times in order for the authors to become familiar with the data and to identify initial themes. In the next stage, we divided the data into three sections following the questionnaire: past, present, and future. Open coding was then performed to elicit initial categories (for every section) and the answer were broken down into "units of meaning," with each unit labeled according to its content .

In the next stage, the codes were grouped together as initial themes. As the authors read the data again, some of the themes were removed or changed and additional codes and categories were added. For example, several codes were defined as 'positive outcomes of COVID-19' and 'negative outcomes of COVID-19' but after consideration became 'outcomes' that consisted of both sides as the findings were noted to actually be more nuanced. In addition, the division into 'past', 'present' and 'future' were united and themes were created that combined the data. In the third stage, the themes and subthemes were reviewed and classified by their dimensions and properties (Corbin & Strauss, 2008) . For example, all the various changes in responses of professionals were merged and separated from all other topics and grouped together.

During this stage, the researchers repeatedly read the answers in order to unearth additional data that could further develop the categories (Maykut & Morehouse, 1994) .

Finally, in the fourth stage, themes were refined, named, and interrelationships between them were suggested (Braun & Clarke, 2006) . The first stage of analysis was performed by the first and second author; a researcher and lecturer in social work specializing in child sexual abuse and qualitative research methods, and a doctoral student in social work specializing in child sexual abuse and practitioner in the field of IFCSA. These researchers speak both languages and they translated the Hebrew quotes to English in order for the other researchers to be able to join the data analysis. All authors took part in the last stages of the analysis.

Selected excerpts from the source materials were discussed throughout in several peer-debriefing sessions. In further stages the analysis was shared and discussed with all other authors, and changes were made according to their comments. Every question was resolved with a mutual discussion of all authors until agreement was achieved. The entire analysis process was accompanied by reflexive writing by the authors on their ideas, perceptions, thoughts and feelings as they evolved (Cope, 2014; Nowell et al., 2017) . In order to ensure trustworthiness, detailed documentation was performed: raw data excerpts were attached to all interpretations and peer debriefing was documented in writing (Bowen, 2009 ). The study was approved by the ethics committees of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Participants' informed consent was obtained before anonymously responding to the questionnaire. All possible identifying details of respondents were deleted and removed from the dataset before analysis.

The two main themes that emerged during analysis related to (1) It is important to emphasize that the framing of the study was on issues of IFCSA.

All the questions asked about the implications and changes in the work were all under the heading of IFCSA; even if an answer was not directly related to the issue it was given as a response to a question regarding IFCSA.

When asked about the dynamics encountered with families experiencing IFCSA, and the way COVID-19 affected those families, professionals mainly focused on the negative dynamics, which were at times extreme, and the consequences of COVID-19 and its restrictions on families. They described 2 dimensions of stressors/difficulties: global stressors and internal family stressors. The global aspects included financial and environmental stressors that were recognized by professionals in both countries but were emphasized more by US professionals, as explained in the quote: sexual abuse had occurred by stating: "The house is like a pressure cooker and they feel like they are losing control." The range of negative mental states was revealed by a US professional who emphasized how often extreme feelings after IFCSA were becoming even worse during COVID-19 :

There is evidence of extreme anger, confusion, blame, feelings of guilt and shame. Added to these, because of COVID-19... are feelings of isolation, loneliness, self-deprecation, and suicidal ideation is advanced. (US)

Another internal family aspect that emerged that was of major concern raised by professionals was the victim feeling trapped with their abuser. The constant sharing of living space by both perpetrating adult family members as well as siblings with inappropriate sexual behavior and the children they abuse, increased the chances for further abuse of the abused children. As described by one of the US professionals, "children are trapped with their abusers," and "perpetrators (language of the participants) residing in the child's home have more opportunity and time with the victim child".

Maintaining safety plans in cases of siblings with problematic sexual behavior (PSB) was noted to be more difficult during COVID-19 isolation. An example of this difficulty was described by one of the professionals:

There are homes where not all siblings are in the routine (of sleeping in the home during the week if they are at boarding schools) and sleeping arrangements are different between midweek and weekends -for example a child sleeping in the living room (when home for the weekend), and now that all the family and parents are at home 24/7, it is not possible (for them to be Israeli professionals also observed conflicts between the parents and the sibling with PSB. One of the survey participants, a therapist specializing in treatment of siblings with PSB, stated:

The family spends a lot of time together, there is a feeling of lack of air… there are not enough resources to address the different needs of the household members. The ability to hold back frustration is low and the reactions are very extreme. It seems that the parents who are sometimes able to contain the perpetrating sibling are now "blasting" the harsh statements, blaming loudly, even on past events. In one family, they even wanted to "settle the score"

[against the child with PSB] and call police because of a violent incident against animals conducted by the offending sibling, but the feeling actually was that this was an opportunity to punish him for the abuse he conducted. (Israel)

Both the American and the Israeli professionals saw many more challenges and problems caused for the families during COVID-19, and perceived the COVID-19 period as a risk for the parents and children's mental health as well as an opportunity for further abuse to occur. When asked in the interviews whether the COVID-19 period will produce more challenges or resilience for families, the most common answer for both Israeli and American participants was "Definitely more challenges." Yet the shared limited space was also perceived by some professionals in both countries as an opportunity for the formation of familial protective factors. As one of the Israeli participants explained this opportunity:

The truth was that I thought the situation would only be bad and bitter but it turns out that there are good parts too. (Israel)

The positive aspects described by professionals were connected to the fact that families were together all the time sharing the same space, and thus had the chance to spend J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f HOW DOES COVID-19 IMPACT INTRAFAMILIAL CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE? more time together. Thus, while close sharing of the same space was a stress factor for some of the families, in others it helped to create better relationships and more meaningful discourse between parents and children:

In all families, there seems to have been a turnaround regarding the focus being on the home and the parents feeling more emotionally available to the family atmosphere itself. Attention to details increased and pleasantness and containment. Towards the return to school, regression was observed and increased general anxiety at home. (Israel)

One of the professionals analyzed the dynamics between a father and his 16-year-old son who previously sexually abused his sister. During COVID-19 the son was returned from the boarding school:

The first two weeks were very tensioned and the boy almost completely broke off, locked himself in his room and was in great distress. Then there was a surprising adjustment that began from the lack of choice, and even close conversations took place between the boy and his father -which has not been for at least two years […] as for the abused sister, most of the time there was no connection with her brother, who keeps his distance to allow her to feel safe.

However, here too, there were a number of positive interactions -for example, a game that he did for all the little siblings (including the sister), which created a renewed connection. (Israel) Finally, one of the US professionals recognized that positive and negative aspects should not be seen as separated from one another: I don't think the issue of challenges and resilience can be listed as either/or. Some children and families will benefit from increased time together. Others will not. Some children are thriving because they no longer deal with bullying at and other stressors at school. Others won't because they are exposed to parental stress and all the tensions of the household --and have little relief (as they would when attending school or visiting relatives). The situation is likely to exacerbate psychiatric symptoms. This can also go either way. Some individuals will realize that they can "handle" things on their own. Others may see it as further evidence of their "weakness" or vulnerability. (US)

Though both Israeli and US professionals shared an understanding concerning potential differences in IFCSA dynamics during COVID-19, it is important to note that some of the participants in both countries stressed that their understanding of changes in the dynamics are limited because of the limited contact with the families. They stressed that such knowledge will be achieved after the contact is renewed post-COVID-19:

The biggest challenge has been reaching (victims) who are currently being abused given social isolation. I don't think we are really going to see the impact COVID-19 has had on child sexual abuse until the victims can interact with others outside of their family unit. (US)

Two themes emerged related to professional responses to IFCSA in families during COVID-19: (1) reporting abuse and (2) therapeutic interventions for those families with IFCSA which were treated before the COVID-19 pandemic.

In terms or reporting child maltreatment, professionals in both countries (but more evident with the US participants) were extremely concerned by the lack of opportunity to report the abuse : was shifted from the abuse as the focus to family maintenance/stabilization as the focus.

The Israeli professionals often used the term "holding" the families, describing the need to help these families in their activities of daily living and daily survival during COVID-19, as explained by one of the Israeli professionals :

Before the COVID we were busy processing the abuse, its implications for the dynamics between the boy and his parents, and how that is reflected in the interactions and relationships with them today. These processes have largely Positive aspects for therapy were also described such as conducting the intervention in the natural space of the child and family, and being able to conduct a home visitation online. One Israeli professional described how the online communication improved therapy sessions when these were renewed in Israel :

Something was opened with him, and he could share photos and videos of his life and there was also correspondence by email. Something at the time when he did not meet with me sharpened the quality of his meeting at the clinic and made him more devoted to it when he was back to the physical meetings. opinions and stories were collected via responses to an online questionnaire, asking them to reflect on the past, describe the present, and anticipate the future in working with families to address IFCSA. Themes shared by these professionals' address factors related to increased risk related to family stress, barriers to detecting and reporting IFCSA, strategies used in assessment and investigation, and changes to the therapeutic process and context with families.

The stigmatizing, secluded, and secretive nature of IFCSA has historically hindered the process of early identification and response by complicating children's disclosure. Results from these interviews heighten these concerns. With COVID-19 lockdown or similar (e.g., safer-at-home) policies, families experience greater isolation and reduced ability to access both informal and formal support systems. Significantly, greater presence of these risk factors due to COVID-19 was prevalent in the results from the current study. Concerns about the potential rippling impact of unemployment and economic stressors on the mental health and well-being of the caregivers and children were notable. Without essential supports for healthy responses, increased rates of depression, suicide, aggression, alcoholism, drug abuse, and other mental health concerns rise for the caregivers and their children. Concerted efforts by the government and community to develop and implement a safety net of protective factors are needed to reduce these risks. Economic provisions (e.g., stipends, disallowing evictions, access to food and utilities), access to health and mental healthcare, and facilitating social J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f HOW DOES COVID-19 IMPACT INTRAFAMILIAL CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE? collections with others (even virtually) could reduce the swelling of negative impact overall and on rates of IFCSA due to COVID-19.

Moreover, the current study pointed to an important additional risk factor to children and families during COVID-19, which is the clear lack of availability of children to other significant adult figures in their lives. Protection of children from IFCSA often occurs through detection by and disclosure to others in the children's lives.

Traditional trusted adults, such as teachers and neighbors, who facilitate the process of identifying CSA have limited or no contact with the children during COVID-19.

Without access to social networks, IFCSA was perceived to be growing in the Petri dish of COVID-19, in a manner that will last undetected for a longer time period.

Professionals in the current study expressed concern that they were not receiving as many reports of child abuse as was typical, and they predicted a deluge of reports once children were back in contact with professionals, schools, and other activities. This expectation of the professionals deserves further examination as only time will tell the impact of COVID-19 on the reporting of IFCSA.

Resources necessary to respond if anticipated increased reports of child sexual abuse are reported may be compromised due to COVID-19. Forensic interviews are a core component of investigations of child sexual abuse (Lamb et al., 2011) ; those who provide forensic interviews are trained in a specific interview style that is meant to obtain disclosure if abuse occurred and details about the abuse are inquired about in an open-ended, non-leading style. Of course, forensic interviews during COVID-19 are challenged by needs for social distancing and remote procedures for health and safety.

Opening up to a stranger (i.e., the forensic interviewer) about such a sensitive and secretive topic is already difficult for children. Adding on the need to manage this through a tele-platform or with someone wearing a mask may further hinder the process J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f HOW DOES COVID-19 IMPACT INTRAFAMILIAL CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE? of accurately assessing the child's history as well as related risk and protective factors.

As efforts to provide guidance for forensic interviews during COVID-19 (e.g., NCA Engage, 2020) are disseminated, parallel gathering of data to evaluate these new procedures is critical.

The application of technology to health and behavioral health services is not new and has a history of success, yet the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted challenges and positive next steps in this arena. The rapid, widespread implementation of telehealth initially may have hindered the process of engaging families and ongoing therapeutic services. Notably, psychotherapy requires a foundation of trust and privacy, which was stated to be challenging to consistently develop and maintain via the telehealth platform. This may be especially true for therapists who have never utilized telehealth services prior to the pandemic. Many mental health professionals will likely need to gain a new skill set, access to telehealth-related therapeutic resources (e.g., therapeutic games), and planning time needed to successful engaging families and particularly young children. Further, telehealth services require family and provider access to technology (e.g., tablets, Wi-Fi, data), which are not available to all families or in every community. For instance, the Ultra-Orthodox (or Haredi) society represents 12% of Israel's population (Cahaner, Malach & Choshen, 2018) . From this group only 54% of adults over the age of 20 have used computers in recent years compared to an average of over 80% in the general population, and only 43% had used the internet compared to 88% overall (Malach& Cahaner, 2018).

Yet despite these challenges, several participants noted that the widespread implementation of telehealth services actually improved engagement in therapy services for some families, making it easier to attend services. In addition, therapists are now afforded a concrete view into the homes of their clients, which ideally will allow them to tailor therapeutic interventions and homework assignments better.

Although the study includes several strengths, limitations warrant comment.

First, the samples from the US and Israel did differ in participant size and composition.

Notably, a greater proportion of the Israeli group were from therapeutic professions, while the US had a larger percentage of child welfare professionals. As such, it is likely that the participants' responses cross-culturally may also be related to crossprofessional differences. Further research on this topic, with keyed focus on specific professions is warranted. Second, the survey was provided electronically. Although electronic surveys are efficient ways to obtain information, they also can experience a low response rate. As such, the results are limited to those who self-selected into the study, and their experiences may differ from those who did not complete the survey.

However, due to our recruitment strategy, we are unable to indicate how many individuals received the survey but declined to participate. Further, due to the small sample size we could not address ethnoreligious and cultural components which may affect dynamics and interventions during COVID-19 (e.g., lack of access to Internet in secluded religious groups).

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought about concerns regarding consequences and impact on IFCSA. These consequences, both positive and negative, have emphasized the importance of the provision of adequate socioemotional and concrete, tangible supports for families. Policies should continue to support the basic needs of families with IFCSA. Future study on this topic should continue to weigh the costs and benefits of utilizing telehealth and tele-forensic/adapted interview services when inperson services are unavailable. In light of the findings, this study will form the basis J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f HOW DOES COVID-19 IMPACT INTRAFAMILIAL CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE? for further research that examines how agencies handle resources if the potential for a deluge of reports once school reopens becomes a reality. Further, the impact of social isolation and economic stress should continue to be evaluated as the pandemic continues.

Risk factors for child sexual abuse victimization: A meta-analytic review

The current prevalence of child sexual abuse worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Document analysis as a qualitative research method

Using thematic analysis in psychology

Moving beyond poverty: neighborhood structure, social processes, and health

Statistical report on ultra-Orthodox society in Israel 2017. Jerusalem Institute for Policy Research. [Hebrew]Celik, Accommodation syndrome

Changes in Family Life and Relationships during the COVID-19 Pandemic and their Associations with Perceived Stress

Social capital in the creation of human capital

When it counts the most: Traumainformed care and the COVID-19 global pandemic

Resilience in Midwestern families: Selected findings from the first decade of a prospective, longitudinal study

The temporal impact of economic insecurity on child maltreatment: a systematic review

Methods and meanings: credibility and trustworthiness of qualitative research

Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 3. J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f HOW DOES COVID-19 IMPACT INTRAFAMILIAL CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE?

How neighborhoods influence child maltreatment: A review of the literature and alternative pathways

How neighborhoods influence child maltreatment: A review of the literature and alternative pathways

Adolescents who experienced sexual abuse: Fears, needs and impediments to disclosure

The potential impact of the COVID-19 on child abuse and neglect: The role of childcare and unemployment

Economic predictors of child maltreatment in an Australian population-based birth cohort. Children and youth services review

Child physical abuse and self-perceived social isolation among adolescents

The prevention of child sexual abuse: An overview of needs and problems

Characteristics of crimes against juveniles

A study of potential risk factors for sexual abuse in childhood

The prevalence

Social isolation from communities and child maltreatment: a cross-cultural comparison

The prevalence, nature, and impact of intrafamilial child sexual abuse: Findings from a rapid evidence assessment

2020) Impacts of Pandemics and Epidemics on Child Protection: Lessons learned from a rapid review in the context of COVID-19

How can children be protected when they are unseen

Changes in the prevalence of child sexual abuse, its risk factors, and their associations as a function of age cohort in a Finnish population J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f HOW DOES COVID-19 IMPACT INTRAFAMILIAL CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE? sample

Tell me what happened

Child Maltreatment during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Consequences of Parental Job Loss on Psychological and Physical Abuse Towards Children

Examining the relationship between economic hardship and child maltreatment using data from the Ontario Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse and Neglect-2013 (OIS-2013)

A randomized study of neighborhood effects on low-income children's educational outcomes

Comparing intra and extra-familial child sexual abuse in a forensic context

Multilevel investigation into the community context of child maltreatment

The yearbook of ultra-Orthodox society in Israel 2018. The Israel democracy institute (RE)

The impact of housing instability on child maltreatment: a causal investigation

Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide

From financial hardship to child difficulties: Main and moderating effects of perceived social support. Child: care, health and development

Containing the secret of child sexual abuse

Children's disclosure of sexual abuse: A systematic review of qualitative research exploring barriers and facilitators

Can a virus undermine human rights

Emergency Tele-Forensic Interview Guidelines A Guide For The Children's Advocacy Center Response During The COVID-19

Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria

Most Americans Say Coronavirus Outbreak Has Impacted Their Lives

Perceptions of early relationships during the transition to motherhood: The mediating role of social support. Infant Mental Health Journal: Official Publication of The World Association for Infant Mental Health

Social capital: Measurement and consequences

Coronavirus disease 2019 and children: what pediatric health care clinicians need to know

Parent-child aggression risk in expectant mothers and fathers: A multimethod theoretical approach

Children Behind Closed Doors Due to COVID-19 Isolation: Abuse, Neglect and Domestic Violence. Archives of Psychiatry Research

Neighborhood disorder, subjective alienation, and distress

The neighborhood context of well-being

Spatial (dis) advantage and homicide in Chicago neighborhoods. Spatially integrated social science

Assessing "neighborhood effects

Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy

Disclosure of child sexual abuse by adolescents: A qualitative in-depth study

The puzzle of intrafamilial child sexual abuse: A meta-analysis comparing intrafamilial and extrafamilial offenders with child victims

Neighborhood cohesion as a buffer against hostile maternal parenting

Barriers and facilitators affecting self-disclosure among male survivors of child sexual abuse: The service providers' perspective

Risk and protective factors for child neglect during early childhood: A cross-study comparison

Child protection in the time of COVID-19

Risk factors in child maltreatment: A meta-analytic review of the literature

Neighborhood characteristics and the social control of registered sex offenders

Children with sexual behavior problems

The secret of intrafamilial child sexual abuse: Who keeps it and how

Adult disclosure of child sexual abuse: A literature review

Child Advocacy Center intervention with sibling sexual abuse cases: Cross-cultural comparison of

Is disclosure of sexual traumas helpful? Comparing experimental laboratory versus field study results

Social effects of Covid-19 pandemic on children in India

A longitudinal study on the mental health of general population during the COVID-19 epidemic in China

Neighborhood characteristics of registered sex offender residential locations: Evidence from the state of Ohio

Evaluation and referral for child maltreatment in pediatric poisoning victims