key: cord-0952529-apllyrhm authors: Mansueto, Giovanni; Lopes, Fabiana Leão; Grassi, Luigi; Cosci, Fiammetta title: Impact of COVID‐19 outbreak on Italian healthcare workers versus general population: Results from an online survey date: 2021-07-21 journal: Clin Psychol Psychother DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2644 sha: 61061f78f4aa401eb84428ec4b0fbdf9c6caeffc doc_id: 952529 cord_uid: apllyrhm OBJECTIVE: COVID‐19 pandemic has been a stressful condition. We explored life changes and health‐related consequences of COVID‐19 outbreak in Italian healthcare workers in comparison to the general population. METHODS: A total of 593 subjects participated to the online CoRonavIruS Health Impact Survey. Life events and changes, physical health and worries were evaluated referring to 2 weeks prior to the survey. Mood states and daily behaviour were retrospectively evaluated referring to 3 months before COVID‐19 (T1) and 2 weeks prior to the survey (T2). Student t test, Mann–Whitney test and multivariate logistic regression analyses were run. RESULTS: Five hundred and twenty‐one subjects were analysed (healthcare workers: n = 163, 31.84%; general population: n = 349, 68.16%). Healthcare workers were more likely to report fatigue and have spent more time outside home during the 2 weeks prior to the survey than the general population (χ (2) ((df)) = 266.0(3(17)), p < 0.001, R (2) = 0.57). From T1 to T2, healthcare workers had a significant increase in negative mood, worry, restlessness, loneliness and a decrease in happiness, while subjects from the general population had a statistically significant increase in negative mood, worry, attention, concentration difficulties and a decrease in happiness, pleasure related to daily activities, time spent outdoors and alcohol use. CONCLUSION: In the framework of a growing literature on healthcare workers' status during the COVID‐19 pandemic, the present study allowed to identify fatigue and loneliness as psychosomatic modifiable variables in need of being monitored and, possibly managed, to ameliorate the health status of healthcare workers. The COVID-19 outbreak is a pandemic in which a coronavirus was identified as the cause of a systemic disease having a specific respiratory involvement (World Health Organization, 2019a , 2019b . It was first detected in Wuhan, China , and rapidly became a global health emergency of international concern. By 6 May 2021, there were 153.954.491 confirmed infections and 3.221.052 deaths worldwide (World Health Organization, 2019c) . The COVID-19 pandemic has changed healthcare workers lives quickly and abruptly (Theorell, 2020; Truog et al., 2020) . They have become first-line fighters engaged in treating COVID-19 patients (Theorell, 2020; . They have also been daily exposed to source of distress due to workload (Theorell, 2020) , job dissatisfaction (Peng et al., 2021) , or conflicts (Peng et al., 2021) , difficulties in facing ethical decisions (e.g., how to allocate limited ventilators) (Theorell, 2020; , shortage of individual protective equipment (World Health Organization, 2019d), risk of being infected (Nguyen et al., 2020) , fear of being infected and infecting their families (Huang et al., 2020) , social disruption of daily life (Shaukat et al., 2020) , and exposure to stressful life events such as a bulk of patients dead . Based on the evidence of adverse effects related to exposure to stressful conditions (Fava et al., 2019; Schneiderman et al., 2005) , the health consequences of the COVID-19 epidemic on healthcare workers have been recognized as a priority challenge (Busch et al., 2021; Chirico et al., 2020; Theorell, 2020) , and the literature on this topic has proliferated (Busch et al., 2021; Shaukat et al., 2020) . A higher prevalence of psychological distress, insomnia, anxiety, depression, obsessive symptoms, posttraumatic stress symptoms, somatization and abnormal illness has been observed in health workers than in nonmedical staff (Busch et al., 2021; Pappa et al., 2020; . Similarly, burnout and poor well-being were observed (Busch et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2021) . As what concerns physical symptoms, fever, cough, weakness and cutaneous manifestations were found as the most common among healthcare workers (Shaukat et al., 2020) . Unfortunately, only a minority of studies monitored changes of symptoms using longitudinal designs. In particular, few short-term prospective studies showed a worsening of sleep quality among COVID-19 frontline workers at 1-month follow-up and an improvement of mental state and lower risk of depression, anxiety and posttraumatic stress symptoms at 1- and 2-month follow-ups . No A cross-sectional study with a retrospective assessment was conducted. Subjects were recruited via email and social media. Those who agreed to participate provided a digital informed consent of privacy protection disclaimer and completed the CoRonavIruS Health Impact Survey (CRISIS) (Nikolaidis et al., 2021) , Italian version. The CRISIS was developed by the National Institute of Mental Health, the New York Child Mind Institute, and the New York State Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, to provide a comprehensive assessment of the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on daily lives (Nikolaidis et al., 2021) . Along with demographic and clinical descriptive variables, CRISIS investigates exposure to COVID-19, concerns, worries, mood states, life changes and daily behaviours (e.g., daily hours of sleep, routine physical activity and media use) related to COVID-19 (Nikolaidis et al., 2021) . CRISIS has shown good reliability and construct validity (Nikolaidis et al., 2021) . Socio-demographic (i.e., age, sex, race, ethnicity, urbanicity, work- ing status, education, household size, number of rooms in the house and house size) and clinical data (i.e., physical symptoms during the 2 weeks prior to the survey, current psychotropic medications, past or current psychotherapy, health and emotional status before COVID-19, being exposed to individual with COVID-19 and family member in self-quarantine during the 2 weeks prior to the survey) were also collected via a set of interview-based screening questions as part of the CRISIS background section (Nikolaidis et al., 2021) . Stressful life events related to COVID-19 were assessed using a set of CRISIS items evaluating personal infection, impacts of COVID-19 on family • Exposure to COVID-19 is a distressing condition. • In the pandemic, healthcare workers had different response to stress than general population. • During COVID-19 outbreak, healthcare workers had fatigue. • During COVID-19 outbreak, healthcare workers had loneliness. • Fatigue and loneliness are psychosomatic modifiable variables in need of being monitored and, possibly managed, to ameliorate the health status of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 outbreak. member (e.g., infection, hospitalization, financial problems and death), changes in school or work conditions/activities due to COVID-19 in the 2 weeks prior to the survey (Nikolaidis et al., 2021) . The following instruments were administered as part of CRISIS: COVID-19 Worries Scale, Mood states scale, a set of items evaluating life changes, daily behaviours and substance use (Nikolaidis et al., 2021) . The COVID-19 Worries Scale (Nikolaidis et al., 2021 ) is a 5-item tool assessing worry of being infected, friends and family's infection, effects of COVID-19 on own physical and mental health, and time spent reading or talking about COVID-19 during the previous 2 weeks. The items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate greater worry. In addition, one item assessing the hope that COVID-19 will end soon is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (from 'not all' to 'very much') during the 2 weeks prior to the survey (Nikolaidis et al., 2021) . The Mood states scale is a 10-item tool assessing worry, mood (happy vs. sad), pleasure related to daily activities, anxiety, restlessness, fatigue, attention, concentration, irritability, loneliness and negative thoughts (Nikolaidis et al., 2021) . The items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores mean higher level of negative mood experienced. The mood states were evaluated retrospectively referring to 3 months prior to the COVID-19 (T1) and 2 weeks prior to the survey (T2) (Nikolaidis et al., 2021) . The CRISIS items evaluating life changes due to COVID-19 are rated on a 5-point Likert scale measuring time spent outside home (from 'not all' to 'very long time'), concerns about housing instability (from 'not at all' to 'very worried'), changes in social contacts (from 'worse social contact' to 'better social contact'), economic difficulties (from 'no difficulties' to 'great difficulties'), stressors related with changes (from 'no stress' to 'higher stress'), and difficulties on keeping social distancing due to COVID-19 (from 'not at all' to 'very difficult'). In addition, one item measures the number of people met outside own family to have in-person conversation, and two items (yes/no) assess food insecurity and positive changes related to COVID-19 (Nikolaidis et al., 2021) . Life changes due to COVID-19 were retrospectively evaluated referring to 2 weeks prior to the survey. Six CRISIS items assess daily behaviours and are rated on a 5-point Likert scale. They measure the number of hours of sleep in the weekdays (from 'less than 6 h' to 'more than 10 h'), the frequency Healthcare workers and general population were compared. Healthcare workers were those engaged in promotion, protection or improvement of health either as direct care practitioners (e.g., physicians and nurses) or indirectly (e.g., aides, helpers, medical laboratory scientists and social workers) (Dal Poz et al., 2007; World Health Organization, 2010 (Cohen, 1988; Coolican, 2009 ). Chi-square tests and Fisher test when more than 20% of cells had expected frequencies less than 5 (Nisbet et al., 2009) were run to compare rates of categorical variables (e.g., sex and race). Cramer V coefficient was calculated as a measure of the effect size (Cumming, 2012) ; it may range between 0 (no association) and +1 (perfect association). Because of the high number of comparisons, Bonferroni post hoc correction was applied (Munro, 2005) . Stressful life events were defined a posteriori according to Paykel et al. (1971) were included in the model as dependent variables to take into account the different type of worries. The coefficient of determination R 2 was calculated as a goodness-of-fit measure (Cumming, 2012) . R 2 uses a convenient 0%-100% scale; the larger the R 2 , the better the regression model fits the data observed. The overtime changes in mood states and behaviours from 3 months before COVID-19 (T1) to 2 weeks prior to the survey (T2) were evaluated calculating delta values (T2 minus T1) for each rating scale score. Positive or negative differences indicated an increase or a decrease in each score, respectively (Griez et al., 2001) . Analyses were performed via SPSS, version 21 (SPSS Inc). Twosided significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05. A total of 593 subjects completed the survey. Among them, 23 (3.88%) were excluded because they did not live in Italy, and 58 (9.78%) because they had at least one self-reported lifetime psychiatry disorder. Data obtained from 512 subjects were analysed: 163 (31.84%) healthcare workers (physicians: n = 45, 27.61%; psychologists: n = 33, 20.25%; nurses: n = 30, 18.40%; psychotherapists: n = 24, 14.72%; specialist physicians: n = 13, 7.98%; medical assistants: n = 9, 5.52%; physiotherapist: n = 4, 2.45%; dentists: n = 4, 2.45%; medical laboratory scientists: n = 1, 0.61%) and 349 (68.16%) subjects from the general population. Healthcare workers were older, had less cohabitants and rooms in the house and had more frequently lived in large city than subjects from the general population. Healthcare workers were more frequently employed, had post-graduation degrees, were more frequently exposed to individuals with COVID-19, and presented more frequently fatigue during the 2 weeks prior to the survey than subjects from the general population (see Table A1 ). Healthcare workers self-perceived a better mental health status before COVID-19 (mean ± SD: 2.66 ± 0.73 vs. 2.42 ± 0.95; p = 0.013; η 2 = 0.010) than subjects from the general population. Healthcare workers less frequently reported changes in school or works conditions due to COVID-19 than subjects from general population (see Table A2 ). No statistically significant differences were found for the number of stressful life events (health workers: 1.18 ± 1.02 vs. subjects from the general population: 1.31 ± 1.02; p = 0.093; η 2 = 0.006). During the 2 weeks prior to the survey, healthcare workers had statistically significant lower worry about the effects of COVID-19 on own health status as well as on food shortage; they had a higher number of people met outside besides their own family and more time spent outside home than subjects from the general population (see Tables A3 and A4 ). The multiple regression analysis showed that healthcare workers were more likely to have a lower number of rooms in the house, to have been exposed to individuals with COVID-19, to report fatigue, to have less changes in school or work conditions, and have spent more time outside home during the 2 weeks prior to the survey than the general population group (χ 2 (df ) = 266.03 (17) , p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.57) ( Table 1) . Over time changes from 3 months before COVID-19 to 2 weeks prior to the survey were observed in healthcare workers in terms of increase in negative mood, worry, restlessness, loneliness and a decrease in happiness. On the other hand, subjects from the general population had a statistically significant increase in negative mood, worry, attention and concentration difficulties, and a decrease in happiness, pleasure related to daily activities, time spent outdoors and alcohol use ( Table 2 ). When over time changes between 3 months and 2 weeks prior to the survey were compared between healthcare workers and general population, no statistically significant differences were found (Table 2) . The overtime changes documented are the innovative findings of the study. In particular, healthcare workers had an increase of restlessness and loneliness, which was not found in the general population. As expected, during the COVID-19 outbreak, the exposure to subjects infected by COVID-19 was more common among healthcare workers than the general population (Bielicki et al., 2020; De Brier et al., 2020) . Healthcare workers also had changed working conditions related to an increase in working load Theorell, 2020; , while the changes observed in the general population were due to the restrictions to limit the spread of the coronavirus (Barouki et al., 2021; Viner et al., 2020) , which imposed the closure of school, shifting to on-line learning, the closure of nonessential businesses and working from home. Healthcare workers had more fatigue than the general population; fatigue prevalence was described between 35% and 56% according to the studies (Hou et al., 2020; Salazar de Pablo et al., 2020; Zhan et al., 2020) . Healthcare workers had lower levels of worry about the effects of COVID-19 on own physical health and on food shortage than subjects form the general population. The lower levels of worry about the effects of COVID-19 among healthcare workers seem related to the fact that healthcare workers had a professional and academic knowledge on COVID-19 while the general population was informed via media, friends, acquaintances and similar. Academic knowledge and information reduce both worry and anticipated worry, which are, on the contrary, increased by information acquired via other sources (Ho et al., 2020) . Healthcare workers were also less worried on food shortage. This can be explained by the fact that they were not at risk of losing their work, while subjects from the general population had often to stop working, being employed in nonessential businesses, and had economic problems more commonly than healthcare workers (Peng et al., 2021) . However, different manifestations of worry, e.g., persistent worry about COVID-19 and its negative consequences (Busch et al., 2021; Labrague & De Los Santos, 2021; Sahashi et al., 2021; Wahlund et al., 2021) , dysfunctional and a transient, generic worry about COVID-19 infection and bodily preoccupations (Cosci & Guidi, 2021; Nardi & Cosci, 2021) , have been documented during the pandemic and differently observed among healthcare workers and in the general population (Asmundson & Taylor, 2020; Busch et al., 2021; Sahashi et al., 2021; Wahlund et al., 2021) . In terms of multivariate regression analysis results, the variables more likely related to healthcare workers than to the general population condition were less rooms in house (which can be explained by the fact that healthcare workers more frequently live in cities rather than in the countryside); more exposure to individuals with COVID-19, more time spent outside home, and less changes in work conditions (which is expected considering the central role of healthcare workers' in fighting against COVID-19); and more fatigue. Fatigue is a well-known psychosomatic manifestation (Fava et al., 2017) , subsumed under the rubric of somatization (Fava et al., 2017) , which has been already found more common among medical health workers than nonmedical health workers (Zhan et al., 2020) . We observed an increase of restlessness (AlAteeq et al., 2020; Sakib et al., 2021) and loneliness (Kotera et al., 2021; Shechter et al., 2020; Walton et al., 2020) among healthcare workers, which can be both related to the working overload in a condition in which individual protective devices prevent socialization at work and in which the fear of infecting own families is often the cause of a selfisolation in private life. On the other side, subjects from general population spent less time outdoor (possibly related to restrictions), had less pleasure in daily activities (which can be explained by the psychological burden caused by COVID-19) (Brailovskaia et al., 2021) and had a decrease of concentration and attention which confirms data from a previous study (Fiorenzato et al., 2021) . Subjects from the general population also decreased alcohol use. This finding is not consistent with the literature (Jacob et al., 2021; Schmits & Glowacz, 2021) but can be related to a decreased availability of alcohol due to closing of bars, pubs and restaurants (Rehm et al., 2020) . The research has some limitations. Subjects were recruited via email and social media, which limit generalizability of results. However, this method of recruitment is common and was commonly used especially during the pandemic, being safe in terms of physical distancing . In addition, due to the sample size, it was not possible to stratify the analyses according to different healthcare professions. Finally, we used a retrospective design although the gold standard in longitudinal studies is a prospective one. Future research should be conducted in larger samples and using a prospective approach. A strength of the study is the evaluation of overtime changes in mood states and behaviours while the large majority of the literature does not measure changes being cross sectional. In brief, loneliness and fatigue seem to be the only variables which can be modulated to ameliorate healthcare workers' quality of life. Unfortunately, while some proposal aimed at facilitating healthcare workers' relaxation have been made , no attention has been devoted to strategies able to manage fatigue and loneliness. The psychosomatic approach, which gives rooms to psychological as well as social factors that can influence positively or negatively the individual's overall health, seems to be an ideal frame (Cosci & Guidi, 2021) for helping healthcare workers in the era of COVID-19. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. The data of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon request. Note. Bonferroni post-hoc correction (p ≤ 0.05/3 that is p ≤ 0.017). Chi-square for categorical variables. Mental health among healthcare providers during coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in Saudi Arabia How health anxiety influences responses to viral outbreaks like COVID-19: What all decision-makers, health authorities, and health care professionals need to know The COVID-19 pandemic and global environmental change: Emerging research needs Monitoring approaches for health-care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet Infectious Diseases The association between depression symptoms, psychological burden caused by Covid-19 and physical activity: An investigation in What we have learned from two decades of epidemics and pandemics: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the psychological burden of frontline healthcare workers Nurses endured high risks of psychological problems under the epidemic of COVID-19 in a longitudinal study in Wuhan China A study of basic needs and psychological wellbeing of medical workers in the fever clinic of a tertiary general hospital in Beijing during the COVID-19 outbreak A cross-sectional study of mental health status and self-psychological adjustment in nurses who supported Wuhan for fighting against the COVID-19 COVID-19: Protecting healthcare workers is a priority Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences Research methods and statistics in psychology The role of illness behavior in the COVID-19 pandemic Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis Counting health workers: Definitions, data, methods and global results. World Health Organization Factors affecting mental health of health care workers during coronavirus disease outbreaks (SARS, MERS & COVID-19): A rapid systematic review Current psychosomatic practice Cognitive and mental health changes and their vulnerability factors related to COVID-19 lockdown in Italy Anxiety disorders: An introduction to clinical management and research Different impacts of COVID-19-related information sources on public worry: An online survey through social media Self-efficacy and fatigue among non-frontline health care workers during COVID-19 outbreak: A moderated mediation model of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and negative coping Mental health survey of 230 medical staff in a tertiary infectious disease hospital for COVID-19 Alcohol use and mental health during COVID-19 lockdown: A cross-sectional study in a sample of UK adults Mental health of medical workers in Japan during COVID-19: Relationships with loneliness, hope and self-compassion Prevalence and predictors of coronaphobia among frontline hospital and public health nurses Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia Statistical methods for health care research Expert opinion in anxiety disorder: Coronaphobia, the new face of anxiety Risk of COVID-19 among front-line health-care workers and the general community: A prospective cohort study. The Lancet Public Health The Coronavirus Health and Impact Survey (CRISIS) reveals reproducible correlates of pandemicrelated mood states across the Atlantic Handbook of statistical analysis and data mining applications Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis Scaling of life events Post-COVID-19 epidemic: Allostatic load among medical and nonmedical Workers in China Alcohol use in times of the COVID 19: Implications for monitoring and policy Worries and concerns among healthcare workers during the coronavirus 2019 pandemic: A web-based cross-sectional survey Fear of COVID-19 and depression: A comparative study among the general population and healthcare professionals during COVID-19 pandemic crisis in Bangladesh Impact of coronavirus syndromes on physical and mental health of health care workers: Systematic review and meta-analysis Changes in alcohol use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Impact of the lockdown conditions and mental health factors Stress and health: Psychological, behavioral, and biological determinants Physical and mental health impacts of COVID-19 on healthcare workers: A scoping review Psychological distress, coping behaviors, and preferences for support among New York healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic COVID-19 and working conditions in health care The toughest triage -allocating ventilators in a pandemic School closure and management practices during coronavirus outbreaks including COVID-19: A rapid systematic review. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health Brief online cognitive behavioural intervention for dysfunctional worry related to the COVID-19 pandemic: A randomised con trolled trial Mental health care for medical staff and affiliated healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic Classifying health workers: Mapping occupations to the international standard classification WHO characterizes COVID-19 as a pandemic Shortage of personal protective equipment endangering health workers worldwide Experiences of healthcare providers during the coronavirus pandemic and its impact on them: Protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review Prevalence and influencing factors on fatigue of first-line nurses combating with COVID-19 in China: A descriptive cross-sectional study COVID-19 pandemic: Study on simple, easy, and practical relaxation techniques while wearing medical protective equipment Mental health and psychosocial problems of medical health workers during the COVID-19 epidemic in China Job-related factors associated with changes in sleep quality among healthcare workers screening for 2019 novel coronavirus infection: A longitudinal study Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on Italian healthcare workers versus general population: Results from an online survey