key: cord-0951761-u0vaws43
authors: Deb, Chirajyoti; Salinas, Allan N.; Zheng, Tianyu; Middleton, Aurea; Kern, Katelyn; Penoyer, Daleen; Borsadia, Rahul; Hunley, Charles; Abomoelak, Bassam; Mehta, Vijay; Irastorza, Laura; Mehta, Devendra I.; Huo, Qun
title: A 1-minute blood test detects decreased immune function and increased clinical risk in COVID-19 patients
date: 2021-12-06
journal: Sci Rep
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02863-2
sha: 7573a9c016c868453424a51c391233ad3aefed9a
doc_id: 951761
cord_uid: u0vaws43

Upon infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, most people will develop no or mild symptoms. However, a small percentage of the population will become severely ill, and some will succumb to death. The clinical severity of COVID-19 has a close connection to the dysregulation of the patient’s immune functions. We previously developed a simple, nanoparticle-enabled blood test that can determine the humoral immune status in animals. In this study, we applied this new test to analyze the immune function in relation to disease severity in COVID-19 patients. From the testing of 153 COVID-19 patient samples and 142 negative controls, we detected a drastic decrease of humoral immunity in COVID-19 patients who developed moderate to severe symptoms, but not in patients with no or mild symptoms. The new test may be potentially used to monitor the immunity change and predict the clinical risk of patients with COVID-19.

www.nature.com/scientificreports/ by using immunoassays such as ELISA and quantitated as antibody titer. The level of neutralizing antibodies is analyzed by evaluating the viability of live virus using techniques such as plaque reduction assay. Higher anti-virus antibody titers were found in patients with more severe symptoms compared to those with only mild symptoms 17, 18 . On the other hand, neutralizing antibodies with strong potency in the COVID-19 patients is a predictor of survival 25, 26 . While type 1 immunity is dominated with cell-mediated immune responses and type 2 immunity leads primarily to antibody-mediated immune responses, both types are inter-connected through the humoral immune system, particularly, the immunoglobin G (IgG) subclasses. In humans, IgG1 and IgG3 are associated with type 1 immune response, and IgG4 is linked to type 2 immune response 27, 28 . In bovine, IgG2 is associated with type 1 and IgG1 is associated with type 2 immunity 29 . In murine models, IgG2a is a specific indicator of type 1 immunity and mouse IgG1 is a marker of type 2 immunity 30 . Under typical, healthy conditions, there is a balance between type 1 and type 2 immunity-associated IgG subclasses. Upon infection or other changes of physiological conditions such as pregnancy or parturition, such balance may be disturbed 29, 31 . The ratio of IgG subclasses in blood serum or plasma is often used as a marker to evaluate the relative balance of type 1 and type 2 immune responses in humans and animals [32] [33] [34] .

We previously developed a rapid blood test, D2Dx immunity test, that can detect and monitor the humoral immune status and responses in laboratory and farm animals [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] . The test uses a gold nanoparticle (AuNP) as a pseudo virus pathogen to probe the humoral immunity in a blood plasma or serum sample. The AuNP is designed to react with type 1 and type 2 immunity-associated IgG subclasses non-specifically, but differently. Upon interaction with type 1 immunity-associated IgG subclasses, such as human IgG1, IgG3, bovine IgG2 and murine IgG2a, the AuNPs will form large aggregates, leading to a strong color change of the AuNP solution (Fig. 1) . This color change is detected using a handheld colorimeter as shown in Fig. 1 . The AuNP probe can also interact with type 2-associated IgG subclass, i.e., IgG4 for human, IgG1 for bovine, and IgG1 for murine. However, these IgG subclasses will not lead to AuNP aggregate formation, hence, no color change of the assay solution.

To illustrate the principle of this test, we present here a kinetic study of the AuNP interaction with different IgG subclasses. Figure 2A is the reaction kinetics between the AuNP probe with IgG subclasses indicative of type 1 immunity, i.e., human IgG1 and IgG3, bovine IgG2, and mouse IgG2a, while Fig. 2B is the reaction kinetics between the AuNP probe and type 2 indicating subclasses, namely, bovine IgG1, human IgG4, mouse IgG1. The association of human IgG2, mouse IgG2b and mouse IgG3 in type 1 versus type 2 immunity is not as clearly understood as other IgG subclasses, but the results are presented here as well. As clearly demonstrated from the study, all type 1-related IgG subclasses, regardless if it is from human, bovine or murine sources, caused dramatic color change of the assay solution; while all IgG subclasses associated with type 2 immunity, led to almost no color change of the assay solution.

In a blood plasma or serum sample, different IgG subclasses will compete to interact with the AuNP probe, and the measured color change of the assay solution is a quantitative indication of the relative balance of type 1 and type 2 immunity. A high D2Dx test score is indicative of a stronger type 1 immunity and weaker type 2 immunity; while a low test score correlates to a weaker type 1 immunity and stronger type 2 immunity. It should be noted here that although the AuNP probe is designed to primarily react with the type 1 and type 2 immunityassociated IgG subclasses differently, other molecules and biochemicals, especially complement proteins are also involved in the interaction with the AuNP probe, as specifically proven in our published study 35 .

Previously, we have used this new test primarily to study and monitor the humoral immune status and type 1/type 2 immunity balance change in laboratory animal models and agricultural farm animals [35] [36] [37] [38] . Our studies show that the test can detect active immune response in animals upon virus infections, immune function development in neonatal animals, immune status change in dairy cows associated with pregnancy and parturition. Based on these animal studies, we hypothesize that the D2Dx immunity test may be able to detect the immune status change in COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, if the clinical severity of the COVID-19 patients is associated with the relative balance between the type 1 versus type 2 immunity, the test may be able to detect this difference and the result may be used to predict the clinical risk of the patients.

In this study, we tested 142 negative control samples and 153 COVID-19 positive samples (Table 1 ). Figure 3 is the D2Dx immunity test scores of the six study cohorts. P values calculated from student t-test were listed in the plot for different cohort pairs. Our first statistical analysis was focused on the comparison of the negative control cohort (normal-OH) vs the three COVID-19 patient cohorts, since these samples were collected at the same period from April to August 2020 from the same clinical site, Orlando Health. The average test score of the normal-OH, asymptomatic/mild, moderate and severe cohort is 0.069, 0.056, 0.029 and 0.032, respectively. Statistically significant difference was observed in the following cohort pairs: normal-OH vs asymptomatic/mild (P value 0.0048); normal-OH vs moderate (P value 1.1E−14); normal-OH vs severe (P value 7E−16), asymptomatic/mild vs moderate (P value 5.25E−06), and asymptomatic/mild vs severe (P value 2.47E−05). The difference between moderate and severe cohort is not significant (P value > 0.05). The combined test scores of the moderate and severe cohort are significantly lower than the asymptomatic/mild cohort (P value less than 0.0001).

We also compared the differences between the three negative control cohorts, normal-OH, normal-USA, and normal-DR. There is no difference between the normal-USA and normal-DR cohort (P value 0.296). Although we observed a slight difference between the normal-OH cohort and the normal-USA or normal-DR cohort (P value 0.01), the average test scores of the three cohorts are very close, in between 0.063 and 0.069. Compared to the difference we observed from the negative control versus the COVID-19 positive samples, this difference is rather insignificant. Furthermore, the samples in the normal-USA and normal-DR cohort have been stored for almost two years before testing. It is most likely that the biological activity of these two cohort samples has www.nature.com/scientificreports/ changed slightly, leading to a very slightly lower average score in these two cohorts (average score 0.062 and 0.064 for normal-USA and normal-DR cohort) than the more recently collected normal-OH cohort samples (average score 0.069). The comparison of the three negative control cohorts confirms that the D2D X test is a highly robust test, and the difference we observed from the normal control samples and COVID-19 positive samples are indeed caused by the patients' active disease status and different immune responses in the patients.

As initially hypothesized, we believe the difference observed from COVID-19 patients with different degrees of clinical severity can be attributed to their difference in type 1 versus type 2 immunity. Patients who developed no or mild symptoms upon infection must have had stronger type 1 immunity and had the capability to maintain this strong type 1 immune response. In D2Dx immunity test, these patients presented relatively high scores. Patients who develop moderate to severe symptoms are those who did not or could not mount a sufficient type 1 immune response, leading to an invoked type 2 response to help control the infection. In this study, we analyzed the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody level in 9 randomly selected patient samples. We found a strong negative

Type 1 IgG subclasses IgM Type 2 IgG subclasses Type 1 cytokines Type 2 cytokines AuNP Type 2-biased Immunity Type 1-biased Immunity Figure 1 . Illustration of the principle of D2Dx immunity test. A gold nanoparticle (AuNP) is used to probe the humoral immune status in a blood plasma or serum sample. The immune interaction between the AuNP and the blood proteins is detected by monitoring the color change of the AuNPs. The color change of the assay solution is measured using a CT-100 colorimeter reader device and the absorbance change over a reaction time of 30 s is expressed as the test score of the D2Dx immunity test. www.nature.com/scientificreports/ correlation between the D2Dx immunity test score and the anti-virus IgG titer (Fig. 4) , with a Spearman correlation coefficient of − 0.77. This finding, in agreement with many published studies by others [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] , provided strong evidence to support our hypothesis that patients that progressed into more severe clinical symptoms developed a strong type 2, antibody-mediated immunity, hence, showed lower scores in the D2Dx immunity test.

We also analyzed the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM antibody level in 8 out of the 9 samples selected for IgG antibody titer analysis (one sample was not available by the time IgM titer analysis was conducted). We found a moderate positive correlation between the D2Dx immunity test scores and the anti-virus IgM antibody titer, with a Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.53 (data not shown). This observation suggests that the production of IgM antibody at early stage of infection is protective and patients who can produce stronger IgM antibody response may have lower clinical risk 40, 41 . Immune response to viral infection is a highly dynamic process. We analyzed the correlation of the immunity test scores of COVID-19 patients in the moderate and severe cohort with their days from symptom onset and blood collection. This analysis is presented in three graphs: Fig. 5A is the correlation analysis of the moderate cohort; Fig. 5B www.nature.com/scientificreports/ onset days from 0 to 14 days. With the moderate cohort, we found no correlation between the symptom onset days and the immunity test scores (correlation coefficient 0.09). With the severe cohort, when all 21 samples are considered, we found a moderate positive correlation (correlation coefficient 0.54) between the immunity test scores and the symptom onset days. When we limit the days from symptom onset to blood collection to 14 days (2 weeks) in the severe cohort, a strong positive correlation (correlation coefficient 0.73) was found between the immunity test scores and the symptom onset days. Due to limited data, we have in this analysis, the correlation results should be treated with caution. However, the preliminary data indicates that there appears to be a significant dynamic change in the immune response in COVID-19 patients who develop more severe symptoms, while this change is not seen in patients with moderate symptoms. In summary, we reported here an extremely simple and rapid test that can detect the immune status change in COVID-19 patients and the differences between COVID-19 patients with milder symptoms versus those with more severe symptoms and poor clinical outcome. Although this is a preliminary study, many interesting results were observed and the potential of the test as a point-of-care clinical test for COVID-19 patient management was demonstrated. The test involves a simple one-step process, and the result is obtained in less than 1 min. Although we used blood plasma samples collected through full blood draw in the current study, the test can use blood samples obtained from finger prick, since only a few µL of plasma sample is needed to perform the test. More extensive clinical studies should be conducted to further validate the test. In this study, we did not evaluate the potential influences of clinical interventions, comorbidities, or other demographic factors including age, sex, race or ethnicities of the patients on the test results. Our main objective was to evaluate the applicability of D2Dx test to differentiate three groups of subjects with mild/asymptomatic, moderate, severe disease symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection. A small percentage of the patients, especially patients in the severe clinical cohorts received COVID-19 related treatments such as Tocilizumab and/or hydroxychloroquine prior to or at the time of the blood sample collection. These confounding factors may or may not impact the test results and warrant further investigations. P = 7.03 X 10 -16 **** P = 1.07 X 10 -14 **** P = 0.0048 ** P = 0.011 * ns ns P = 2.5 X 10 -5 **** ns P = 5.2 X 10 -6 **** Figure 3 . D2Dx immunity test response among various study cohorts. P values between different group pairs were calculated using student t test. www.nature.com/scientificreports/ In addition to predicting and monitoring the clinical outcome of COVID-19 patients, the novel D2Dx technology we report here may provide a valuable new tool to accelerate the design and development of new vaccines for COVID-19 and other viral infectious diseases. The balance of Th1/Th2 immune response to a vaccination is an important factor to be considered in the design of the vaccine. A vaccine that primarily elicit a Th2 immune response may prevent the initiation of a Th1 immune response, and sometime may exacerbate the disease following infection 42 . A recently completed study by Swanson et al. shows that the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, AZD1222, induced strong spike-specific CD4 + Th1 and CD8 + T-cell responses in vaccinated individuals 43 . A study by Sahin et al. on Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine to COVID-19 also revealed a strong type 1 immune response 44 . These two studies suggest an effective COVID-19 vaccine should primarily elicit Th1-biased immune response. With its simplicity, low cost, and rapid results, D2Dx immunity test may be used to quickly assess the Th1 and Th2 response profile generated by vaccination and monitor such responses kinetically over time. Such data can provide further guidance in the design strategies to improve the efficacy of future new vaccines.

Human blood sample sources and collections. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The blood samples collected in BD Vacutainer Plus Blood Collection Tubes containing K2EDTA were centrifuged at 2000g for separation into cells and plasma as supernatant. The blood plasma samples were obtained from two different sources. Plasma samples of deidentified healthy controls (n = 80) were previously obtained and archived from Boca Biolistics (Boca Raton, Florida) in December 2018 for a different study. Among the 80 samples, 42 were collected in the United States and 38 samples were collected in Dominican Republic. All donors were healthy donors without any reported or known infectious diseases when the samples were collected. The samples were aliquoted and stored at − 80 °C upon receipt until used for this study. Prior to the use for D2Dx assay, the samples were thawed for overnight at 4 °C, and then left to equilibrate at room temperature for 2 h before testing. The samples were tested without any dilution or other treatment.

We collected blood samples from COVID-19 patients and healthy volunteer donors at Orlando Health. The separated plasma supernatants were aliquoted and stored in freezer (− 30 °C). Of which, 62 were from healthy donors and 153 were from COVID-19 positive cases. The study (OH IRB # 20.095.06) was approved by Orlando Health IRB#2. Informed consent was obtained from each patient. Informed consent statement from healthy individual donors was obtained as well. COVID-19 patients were treated at various hospitals within the Orlando Health hospital system as in-patients or out-patients. The IRB also approved to use remnant blood plasma or serum samples from patients and volunteers from a previous serology validation study. The clinical statuses of the study patients were obtained from the patient's medical record, or by self-reporting by volunteer donors. www.nature.com/scientificreports/

In this study, we tested 142 negative control samples and 153 COVID-19 positive samples. 46 , to rank the clinical severity of the patients and group the patients into different cohorts. The uninfected controls are assigned with a 0 score. Patients who were tested positive but exhibited no or only mild symptoms were assigned with a score of 1 (ambulatory with no limitation of activities) or 2 (ambulatory with limitation of activities). These patients were either not hospitalized or were hospitalized for unrelated conditions and found to be positive. From score 3 and above, all patients were hospitalized and treated in various hospitals at Orlando Health. Blood samples were collected during patients' stay in the hospital. The symptoms exhibited by the patient at the time of blood draw were documented. According to the clinical symptom severity, the patient was assigned with the Ordinal Scale from 3 to 7: 3-patients were hospitalized, but no oxygen therapy; 4-patients require oxygen by mask or nasal prongs; 5-patients require non-invasive ventilation or high flow mask; 6-patients require intubation and mechanical ventilation; 7-patients require ventilation and additional organ support such as vasopressors, RRT, and ECMO. We did not include samples from patients who died of COVID-19 in our study, which would be scale 8. In keeping with the Eight Category Ordinal Scale, patients with scale 1-2 were further grouped as asymptomatic/mild cohort (38 samples); patients with scale 3-4 are grouped as moderate cohort (54 samples); and patients with scale of 5 and above are group as severe cohort (61 samples).

D2Dx immunity test of blood plasma samples. D2Dx immunity test kits (catalog D2Dx-hu-500, lot number hu08012020) were received from Nano Discovery Inc. (Orlando, Florida). Each kit contains the AuNP reagent and cuvettes for 500 tests. A handheld colorimeter reader device, CT-100 from Nano Discovery Inc. was used to read the test result. The specific composition and chemical structure of the AuNP reagent is proprietary information of Nano Discovery Inc. The AuNP reagent was manufactured, formulated, and calibrated using the CT-100 reader according to an internal quality control standard established by Nano Discovery Inc.

A 50 μL of the AuNP reagent solution was first placed into a cuvette using a micropipette. Then 10 μL of an undiluted blood plasma sample was added. After mixing the assay solution for 5 s using a mini-vortex mixer, the cuvette was placed in the cuvette holder in CT-100, and the result was read automatically in 30 s. The response of the test was reported directly as the absorbance change of the assay solution over a 30-s of reaction time.

AuNP reagents and IgG subclasses from bovine, human and murine was conducted using the following materials: Bovine IgG1 (pep003, Bio-Rad, 1 mg/mL); bovine IgG2 (pep004, Bio-Rad, 1 mg/mL); human IgG1 (ab90283, Abcam, 3 mg/mL); human IgG2 (ab90284, Abcam, 2.2 mg/mL); human IgG3 (ab118462, Abcam, 2.2 mg/mL); human IgG4 (ab183266, Abcam, 1.5 mg/mL); mouse IgG1 (02-6100, Thermofisher, 1 mg/mL); mouse IgG2a (02-6200, Thermofisher, 1 mg/mL); mouse IgG2b (02-6300, Thermofisher, 1 mg/mL); mouse IgG3 (IMG5119A, Novus Biological, 0.5 mg/mL).

The kinetic study was conducted using a LaMotte model 3250 colorimeter. To an optical cuvette, 100 µL AuNP reagent from the D2Dx immunity test kit (D2Dx-hu-500) was added. Then 10 µL of the IgG subclass protein solution was added. Following mixing for 5 s using a mini vortex mixer, the cuvette was placed in the colorimeter, and the absorbance change of the assay solution was recorded every 30 s for a total reaction time of 3 min.

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to detect SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG and IgM antibodies in plasma samples from patients (positive by PCR test with nasopharyngeal samples) and from donors with or without symptoms, who were tested positive or negative by PCR. Qualitative serology ELISA kits from Creative Diagnostics (Shirley, NY, USA) were used to measure anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG (product # DEIASL019) and IgM (product # DEIASL020) levels in plasma samples. Briefly, 100 μL of negative and positive control were added to the positive and negative control wells without dilution. Ten microliters (10 μL) of plasma samples were added to the wells containing 100 µL of dilution buffer, mixed thoroughly, sealed with cover film, and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. The plate was washed five times using 300 µL of 1 × diluted wash buffer. After completing all the assay steps according to the product instructions, the absorbance of the assay solutions at 450 nm was measured using a plate reader (Synergy H1 Hybrid Reader, BioTek, USA). An OD value of ≥ 0.50 for the positive control and ≤ 0.10 for the negative control sample were obtained, confirming the validity of the assay, per product instruction. The following cutoff values, as provided in the product manual, were used for results interpretation: < 0.3, negative; ≥ 0.3 to < 0.5, intermediate; ≥ 0.50, positive.

Statistical analysis. Statistical differences of test results between different cohorts were analyzed using student t test, two-sample assuming unequal variances. P values < 0.05 were considered as significant difference. The numbers of asterisks indicate significance levels of P values, for example, the symbols of *, **, ***, and **** rep-

COVID-19 Global Cases

COVID-19)

Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China

Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective cohort study

Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan

The trinity of COVID-19: Immunity, inflammation and intervention

Pathological inflammation in patients with USA COVID-19: A key role for monocytes and macrophages

The immunology of COVID-19: Is immune modulation an option for treatment

Immune responses in COVID-19 and potential vaccines: Lessons learned from SARS and MERS epidemic. Asian Pac

Immune response in COVID-19: A review

The immune system and COVID-19: Friend or foe?

Immunology of COVID-19: Current state of the science

Immune response, inflammation, and the clinical spectrum of COVID-19

Immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection in hospitalized pediatric and adult patients

Reduction and functional exhaustion of T cells in patients with coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19)

Reappearance of effector T cells is associated with recovery from COVID-19

Antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19

Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients of novel coronavirus disease 2019

Elevated serum IgM level indicate poor outcome in patients with coronavirus disease pneumonia: A retrospective case-control study

Signals of Th2 immune response from COVID-19 patients requiring intensive care

The moonlighting protein able to explain the Th1 immune lockdown in severe COVID-19

Robust T cell immunity in convalescent individuals with asymptomatic or mild COVID-19

Type 1/type 2 immunity in infectious diseases

Recent advances in therapeutic applications of neutralizing antibodies for virus infections: An overview

COVID-19 neutralizing antibodies predict disease severity and survival

Neutralizing antibody levels are highly predictive of immune protection from symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection

IgG subclass profiles in normal human sera of antibodies specific to five kinds of microbial antigens

Immunoglobulin G4: An odd antibody

Production and turnover of IgG1 and IgG2 immunoglobulins in the bovine around parturition

Lower levels of IgG1 in comparison with IgG2a are associated with protective immunity against Leishmania tropica infection in BALB/c mice

Invited review: Inflammation during the transition to lactation: New adventures with an old flame

Mechanism and regulation of immunoglobulin isotype switching

Evaluation of T helper-1/-2 balance on the basis of IgG subclasses and serum cytokines in children with glomerulonephritis

Th1 and Th2 T helper cell subsets affect patterns of injury and outcomes in glomerulonephritis

A single-step gold nanoparticle-blood serum interaction assay reveals humoral immunity development and immune status of animals from neonates to adults

A rapid blood test to monitor the immune status change of dairy cows and to evaluate their disease risk during the periparturient period

A rapid blood Test to monitor immunity shift during pregnancy and potential application for animal health management

A rapid blood test to determine the active status and duration of acute viral infection

A nanoparticle pseudo pathogen for rapid detection and diagnosis of virus Infection

Delayed specific IgM antibody responses observed among COVID-19 patients with severe progression

Patterns of IgG and IgM antibody response in COVID-19 patients

Vaccines: All things considered

T-cell mediated immunity after AZD1222 vaccination: A polyfunctional spike-specific Th1 response with a diverse TCR repertoire

BNT162b2 vaccine induces neutralizing antibodies and poly-specific T cells in humans

WHO R&D Blueprint novel Coronavirus COVID-19 Therapeutic Trial Synopsis

Remdesivir for the treatment of Covid-19 -Preliminary report

User's guide to correlation coefficients

This study is supported by intramural funding from Nano Discovery Inc. and Orlando Health.

C.D. conceived and designed the study, contributed on the design and development of IRB protocol provided supervision and guidance on the sample processing and tests (serology and D2Dx immunity test), conducted tests, data analysis, and prepared and edited manuscript. D.M. conceived and designed the study, contributed on the design and development of IRB protocol provided supervision and guidance on the sample processing and tests (serology) and D2Dx immunity test), conducted data analysis, and edited manuscript. A.S. conducted and coordinated blood sample acquisitions, clinical data mining, data entry, data analysis, experiments on serology and D2Dx immunity tests; managed other experimental processes, and edited manuscript. A.M. helped with patient enrollment, coordinated blood sample collections, clinical data collections, clinical data mining, etc., reviewed manuscript. K.K. helped with developing the IRB protocol, helped with patient enrollment, blood sample collection, and clinical data collection, reviewed manuscript. D.P. contributed on the design and development of IRB protocol, supervised patient enrolment, clinical sample, and data collections, coordinated the clinical samples and data collection, reviewed and edited manuscript. R.B. treated COVID-19 patients, guided patient enrollment, ordered blood sample collection, heled with clinical data generation, etc. C.H. treated covid-19 patients, guided patient enrollment, ordered blood sample collection, helped with clinical data generation, etc. B.A., helped with experiments on serology test, managed other experimental processes, and reviewed manuscript. V.M. helped with clinical data collection, clinical data entry, reviewed and edited manuscript. L.I. helped with clinical data collection, clinical data entry, reviewed and edited manuscript. T.Z. designed and developed the reader device for D2Dx immunity test, prepared the reagent kits for the test, contributed on the design and development of IRB protocol, conducted data analysis and prepared manuscript. Q.H. conceived and designed the study, provided supervision and guidance on the D2Dx immunity test, conducted data analysis and prepared manuscript.

QH is a shareholder and officer in Nano Discovery Inc. No conflict of interest claim from all other authors.

Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to C.D., D.I.M. or Q.H.

Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/.