key: cord-0950430-d1uo8jgp
authors: Codina, Mercè; Corcoy, Rosa; Goya, María M.
title: An update on gestational hyperglycemia diagnosis during the COVID-19 pandemic
date: 2020-11-03
journal: nan
DOI: 10.1016/j.endien.2020.05.004
sha: 1118eda532dd65aa6b883a63d84eb42fb4e7d57e
doc_id: 950430
cord_uid: d1uo8jgp

nan

Adults with diabetes have been identified as being at risk of severe forms of COVID-19. 1 Pregnant women may be at increased risk of infection during travel to healthcare facilities for screening and/or a diagnosis of gestational hyperglycemia (GH), as well as for the monitoring of GH or pregestational diabetes (PGD). The Spanish Diabetes and Pregnancy Group (Grupo Español de Diabetes y Embarazo [GEDE] ) has decided to join other medical bodies 2---5 in establishing specific recommendations for these two populations, based on the current scientific evidence and for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic, in order to minimize risks.

In both of these groups of pregnant women we advise the use of personal protection measures when travelling, including a mask 6---8 and gloves, adequate hand hygiene, and the maintenance of a safety distance of 2 m 9,10 between people, in other words, the same measures also being recommended for the rest of the population (Fig. 1 ).

Patients in preconception care clinics are advised to use a safe contraceptive method at least until the acute phase of the pandemic is over.

It is advisable to establish and maintain regular remote communication, either by telephone or e-mail, with both the obstetric and the endocrinological teams to allow for an adequate care and follow-up plan.

In general, efforts should be made to conduct visits with the endocrinologist/educator on a remote basis. Most inperson visits should coincide with the visits made to the Obstetrics Department. However, more in-person visits may be required depending on the individual situation of each pregnant woman, particularly at the start of pregnancy, if preconception control has not been followed.

During this period, it is important for patients to: Daily physical exercise at home, despite confinement, is recommended (https://www.embactivo.es/). Ocular fundus assessment in the short term should only be requested in those patients with retinal alterations prior to pregnancy, while in the remaining cases it should be postponed and made on a subsequent visit.

The algorithm for PCR and/or rapid test detection of COVID-19 should be defined at each center according to the available resources, based on the technical document of the Spanish Ministry of Health referring to COVID-19 and pregnancy. 12

The first recommendation is to maintain the two-stage diagnostic protocol proposed in the Diabetes and Pregnancy guide of the GEDE, 11 provided that the conditions of the pregnant woman and her environment and the work burden of the laboratory allow it, and that the professionals involved in the follow-up of these women can take charge of the new diagnoses, and finally that the safety conditions of the pregnant woman are guaranteed (waiting room with safety distance, mask, hand washing, and preferred use of private vehicle to visit the center).

If this is not possible, alternative tests should be made available for the duration of this exceptional situation. The use of alternative tests means taking the following considerations into account 2 :

• The tests must be feasible in settings with limited resources, and should minimize contact with the healthcare center. 

During the first trimester, screening for gestational hyperglycemia should continue in pregnant women at risk. 11 The primary aim of such screening is to detect pregnant women with frank diabetes and those with early gestational diabetes (GD), who have a risk of complications of pregnancy equal to or greater than that of women with pregestational type 2 diabetes. In cases where the regular screening test (O'Sullivan test) is not possible, the options are the measurement of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), basal plasma glucose or plasma glucose at random (to make laboratory testing coincide with the obstetric visit, for example, and to avoid a second visit to the laboratory in order to perform an oral glucose tolerance test [OGTT]). Some groups recommend that all patients with previous GD should be treated as GD without laboratory testing. 5 These criteria are established based on the scientific evidence obtained from previous studies and on recommendations from other medical bodies which possess data indicating that the probability of detecting cases of more severe GD with poorer perinatal outcomes is greater when these cut-off points are used. It should be assumed that probably not all cases of GD will be detected through such screening, particularly the mildest presentations, but we will indeed detect those with an impact upon perinatal morbidity and mortality, which is what is needed at this exceptional time. Table 2 shows the cut-off points established for frank diabetes and proposed for GD.

The recommendation of the GEDE for the diagnosis of gestational hyperglycemia in the first trimester, when the standard protocol cannot be applied, is to measure HbA1c combined with plasma glucose concentration (preferably at 5 . In our setting, in a study conducted at Hospital del Mar in Barcelona in a multiethnic population, HbA1c ≥5.9% in the first trimester was found in 3.9% of the population and was associated with fetal macrosomia and pre-eclampsia, regardless of the presence of GD 13 . Applying the same criterion to the subgroup of pregnant women at risk, a higher percentage is expected to be identified in the study group, though the figure will be lower in the general obstetric population. c Blood glucose ≥ 100 mg/dl identifies 2% of the population and is associated with an increased risk of caesarean delivery and of a newborn large for gestational age/macrosomia, independently of the diagnosis of GD 14 random due to its greater feasibility, or alternatively basal glucose). Screening using HbA1c and blood glucose at random allows us to obviate the blood glucose curve, does not require the pregnant woman to be under fasting conditions, and can be performed on the same day as obstetric monitoring.

Plasma glucose seeks to detect women with recent-onset hyperglycemia and/or hemoglobin disorders.

Plasma glucose measurements for diagnostic purposes should take into account measures to minimize anaerobic glycolysis.

For pregnant women not previously diagnosed with diabetes, universal screening is proposed at around week 28 of pregnancy (obstetric visit between weeks 28 and 32 of pregnancy).

As in the first trimester, the first recommendation is to maintain the two-phase diagnostic protocol at those centers where this is possible. In the current pandemic situation, a screening test result of ≥ 200 mg/dl may be considered as diagnostic of GD. Outside the pandemic, this is not done, because an O'Sullivan test result of ≥ 200 mg/dl has a posi- HbA1c shows high specificity for the diagnosis of GD; sensitivity is low. c Basal blood glucose ≥ 95 mg/dl corresponds to the IADPSG cut-off point for an odds ratio (OR) of 2.0 of the HAPO population, in which this cut-off point identified a prevalence of 4% 21 . At centers using IADPSG diagnostic criteria, the screening/diagnostic procedure may be limited to basal blood glucose (≥ 92 mg/dl, OR 1.75), since it yields a very high percentage of the diagnoses made with the complete curve. In the HAPO cohort, this cut-off point identified a prevalence of 8% 19 . In our setting, the prevalence in the San Carlos trial based on basal blood glucose was > 15% 20 . d Proposed by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists 2 . In a meta-analysis of studies using different diagnostic criteria for GD, HbA1c ≥ 5.7% had a mean sensitivity of 24.7% and a specificity of 95.5% for the diagnosis of GD 17 . With regard to the NDDG criteria, Maesa et al. reported a sensitivity of 25.9% for a cut-off point of ≥ 5.5% 18 . This is why guides such as the Canadian guide propose a combined strategy of HbA1c and random glycemia, while the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists propose HbA1c and basal glycemia or random glycemia 2 . The GEDE also proposes this combined strategy, with an HbA1c cut-off point of 5.7%, which is that used by the other international bodies. tive predictive value for GD according to National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) criteria ranging from 34 to 100% 15 (59.9% in our setting 16 ).

Possible alternatives for centers that are unable to diagnose in two stages are the determination of HbA1c, basal plasma glucose or random plasma glucose. Table 3 describes the cut-off points. Again, these cut-off points have been established based on the available scientific evidence in order to select patients with gestational hyperglycemia at greater risk of suffering perinatal complications 2---4 .

Some groups also recommend that patients with previous GD should be treated as GD without laboratory testing 3 , even though this approach may include a very few patients who do not have GD. The diagnostic test is obviated, thereby minimizing the risk of COVID-19 contagion, and these are women whose need for therapeutic education is low.

The recommendation of the GEDE for the diagnosis of gestational hyperglycemia in the second trimester, when the standard protocol cannot be applied, is to measure HbA1c combined with plasma glucose concentration (preferably at random due to its greater feasibility, or alternatively basal glucose).

Screening using HbA1c and blood glucose at random allows us to obviate the blood glucose curve, does not require the pregnant woman to be under fasting conditions, and can be performed on the same day as obstetric monitoring.

Plasma glucose seeks to detect women with recent-onset hyperglycemia and/or hemoglobin disorders.

Plasma glucose measurements for diagnostic purposes should take into account measures to minimize anaerobic glycolysis.

In addition, during pregnancy in any patient with severe glycosuria, clinically suspected diabetes or a fetus large for the gestational age / polyhydramnios evidenced by ultrasound, GD should be ruled out with any of the previously described options. In the absence of these circumstances, screening in the third trimester of pregnancy should not be considered, even if screening has not been performed in the second trimester.

The treatment and follow-up of GD should be maintained at the usual centers with Endocrinology/Primary Care visits and obstetric visits. After the therapeutic education period (inperson and/or remote), combined in-person visits should be organized similar to those described for women with PGD.

Insulin is the drug of choice when good control criteria are not met and pharmacological treatment is needed. However, when starting insulin is not feasible, metformin initially may be considered for delaying or avoiding it 22, 23 .

Daily physical exercise at home, despite confinement, is recommended (https://www.embactiva.es/).

Both follow-up and the end of pregnancy should be individualized according to each pregnant woman and the situation of the center, while the recommendations established by the latest GEDE guide are observed, if possible 11 .

The algorithm for PCR and/or rapid test detection of COVID-19 should be defined at each center according to the available resources, based on the technical document of the Spanish Ministry of Health referring to COVID-19 and pregnancy 12 .

Breastfeeding is recommended in all pregnant women with PGD or GD, including COVID-19 positive women; in these cases, contact between the mother and the newborn infant should be maintained and breastfeeding performed with breathing isolation measures 24 .

Puerperal women with PGD should be monitored online for the adjustment of metabolic control. Obstetric visits should be kept to the essential minimum required for the assessment of adequate postpartum in these patients, with online visits being resorted to as much as possible.

As regards postpartum, in those patients diagnosed with GD, monitoring should be postponed until the COVID-19 pandemic has passed, care being taken not to exceed the first year of the postpartum period. Patients diagnosed with frank diabetes or with suspected type 1 diabetes may be advised to maintain lifestyle measures, together with fasting capil-lary blood glucose testing, for example every 1−2 weeks, to detect alarm patterns.

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau -Barcelona Cortazar Galarzar, Alicia. Hospital de Cruces -Baracaldo -Vizcaya Donnay Candil

Diabetes is a risk factor for the progression and prognosis of COVID-19

Guidance for maternal medicine services in the evolving coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic

Diagnostic Testing for Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) during the COVID 19 pandemic: Antenatal and postnatal testing advice

for Diabetes Canada Clinical Practice Guidelines Steering Committee and the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada. Urgent Update ---Temporary Alternative Screening Strategy for Gestational Diabetes Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic A Joint Consensus Statement from the Diabetes Canada Clinical Practice Guidelines Steering Committee and the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada

New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes. Screening for GDM during COVID restrictions---Recommendations from New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes

Potential utilities of mask-wearing and instant hand hygiene for fighting SARS-CoV-2

Using face masks in the community Reducing COVID-19 transmission from potentially asymptomatic or presymptomatic people through the use of face masks

Nota de Prensa El Ministerio de Sanidad participa en la elaboración de una especificación UNE para facilitar la fabricación de mascarillas higiénicas

COVID-19) Social Distancing, Quarantine, and Isolation

Asistencia a la gestante con diabetes. Guía de práctica clínica actualizada en

Documento técnico. Manejo de la mujer embarazada y el recién nacido con COVID-19

Role of First-Trimester HbA1c as a Predictor of Adverse Obstetric Outcomes in a Multiethnic Cohort

First-Trimester Fasting Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes

Diagnostic ability of elevated 1-h glucose challenge test

Tinahones F. Is it useful the O'Sullivan test ≥200 to diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)?

Diagnostic accuracy of glycated hemoglobin for gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus by Measuring Glycated Hemoglobin Can Reduce the Use of the Glucose Challenge Test

International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy

Frequency of gestational diabetes mellitus at collaborating centers based on IADPSG consensus panel-recommended criteria: The Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study. Diabetes Care

Introduction of IADPSG criteria for the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus results in improved pregnancy outcomes at a lower cost in a large cohort of pregnant women: the St. Carlos Gestational Diabetes Study

Glibenclamide, metformin, and insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Neonatal, infant, and childhood growth following metformin versus insulin treatment for gestational diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Breastfeeding advice during the COVID-19 outbreak