key: cord-0949331-d1poecga
authors: Kim, Yujin; Yang, Eunhwa
title: Academic library spaces and student activities during the COVID-19 pandemic
date: 2022-04-11
journal: Journal of Academic Librarianship
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102529
sha: b924e847fbd41d994f94a97198d3676d3acb2871
doc_id: 949331
cord_uid: d1poecga

A library in higher education plays a primary role in students' learning on campus. In addition to individually-focused studying, students come to a library for various purposes, such as group learning, collaborating, and socializing. To support students' different types of learning, appropriate physical and functional environments of the spaces must be provided. However, the environmental effects of learning spaces have not been explored extensively. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has forced students to remain and study at home for extended periods, and it is expected that the pandemic experience has affected students' space use patterns. This study aims to examine the effect of the pandemic on students' library usage and to investigate the necessary environments to effectively support students' learning activities. Data was collected via interviews with 12 students. One of the main findings is that, even though students used the library less during the pandemic, they expected to use it as much as pre-pandemic or even more after the pandemic. Furthermore, both physical and functional environments were associated with the study performance and wellbeing of the students. Therefore, understanding students' learning activities and preferred environments in a library is critical to providing appropriate spaces supporting students' learning performance and wellbeing.

Most studies tended to focus on learning spaces in a library, but students also utilize libraries to relax and socialize (Waxman et al., 2007; Xu & Yang, 2018) . Socializing is an important part of learning, and students also need to take a break or hang out with their friends in a library. Therefore, it is important to provide relaxing and socializing spaces in addition to learning spaces for enhancing student wellbeing and academic performance.

Modern academic libraries provide various types of space in order to satisfy users' needs based on the new learning process, which emphasizes the importance of informal learning through collaboration and socialization with other students (Beckers et al., 2015) . For this, library spaces have to play a role in connecting people (Simens, 2008) and encouraging informal face-to-face meetings (Bryant et al., 2009) . Beckers et al. (2015) proposed a conceptual model to explain how learning spaces align with learning processes in higher education. Based on the levels of self-regulation and social interaction, four space concepts were suggested: 1) classroom settings (low self-regulation and low social interaction), 2) collaboration settings (low self-regulation and high social interaction), 3) individual study settings (high self-regulation and low social interaction), and 4) informal learning settings (high self-regulation and high social interaction). Beckers et al. (2016a) suggested that libraries need to provide at least two types of space to support individual study: busy, open space and quiet, closed space. Students use spaces that can better support their learning activities between the spaces for individual study and collaboration Lundström et al., 2016) . Furthermore, providing appropriate space for different activities increases satisfaction with the spaces in an academic setting . However, it is still unknown students' space usage depending on their learning activities. Based on Beckers' theory, understanding which space is appropriate for various activities is important to effectively support students' learning in a library.

The learning space can be characterized by its physical features and the perceived quality of social and functional features of the environment (Beckers et al., 2016a) . The alignment of physical and functional environments with students' activities consequently supports students' performance and wellbeing (Y. Kim et al., 2021) . Research has shown that learning can be influenced by the physical environment where students perform their tasks (Tanner, 2000) , and students prefer spaces that can support their learning activities (Beckers et al., 2016a) . Studies have defined the attributes of physical environments as including satisfaction with indoor environmental quality (IEQ), window views, and spatial arrangements [ Table 1 ]. IEQ has been explored in terms of temperature, noise, lighting, and air quality. A study by Lee (2014) found that students were satisfied with the IEQ differently depending on their collaboration activities. However, Lee's study (2014) focused on collaborative activities only and did not consider functional environments in a library. Functional environments refer to the suitability of environments to occupants' purposes (Kwon et al., 2019) . Academic libraries must provide appropriate spaces for learning, socializing, and relaxing activities. An open-plan space setting, which is actively applied to academic libraries to support collaboration among users, raises several issues in functional environments. In addition to spaces that encourage collaboration, students need quiet, individual study areas offering privacy in libraries (Beckers et al., 2016b; Ellison, 2016) . Both undergraduate-and graduate-level students reported that space for allowing quiet study is more important than group study and work (Association of Research Libraries, 2019; Ramsden, 2011) . Open-plan spaces have been considered inappropriate for work requiring concentration because of distractions and noises (Haapakangas et al., 2018; Yoo-Lee et al., 2013) . Crowding is also frequently regarded as a problem in academic libraries that creates noise and distractions (Cha & Kim, 2020; DeClercq & Cranz, 2014) . Some studies have argued that an open-plan office could be utilized for individual focus work if enough spaces are provided and managed by controlling distraction (Block et al., 2009 ), but it is still debatable. Socializing refers to any social situation, including communicating with others and being with others in the same place, and it is regarded as a part of learning. Therefore, the role of a library is emphasized as both a learning and social space (Bryant et al., 2009) . In order to satisfy various needs, libraries should be able to provide physical and functional environments that connect people with study sources (Simens, 2008) and encourage informal face-to-face meetings/encounters (Bryant et al., 2009) . These functional environments are affected by physical environments and vice versa; students can perceive different types and levels of functional environments in different spaces. In order to support students' learning in a library, it is important to understand how physical and functional environments are related to perceived learning performance and wellbeing in various spaces in a library. Devine-Wright et al. (2020) argued that the power of the pandemic changes the perception of places. The pandemic has unexpectedly restricted people to their homes while it has displaced people from everyday places (Devine-Wright et al., 2020) . One of the notable changes was how people use physical spaces (Jens & Gregg, 2021b) . After the lockdown, universities mandated lectures to be provided entirely or partially online (Crawford et al., 2020) . As a result, students were isolated from their schools and needed to remain at their homes and experience a wholly virtual learning environment in terms of lectures, in-class activities, group projects, and social interaction. In addition, they needed to be mindful of the physical distance between people regardless of the type of activities (Wexler & Oberlander, 2021) . These changes in space use possibly affect students' learning process and performance because they need to adapt their learning strategy to physical spaces. They also might experience social isolation because of the loss of social interaction opportunities with other students in both direct and indirect ways in physical spaces, negatively influencing their wellbeing. However, there is a lack of studies exploring students' activities in academic libraries during the pandemic. Some studies have suggested the possibility that their experiences during the pandemic would affect modification to the meaning of places for the post-pandemic (Low & Smart, 2020; Wexler & Oberlander, 2021) . Therefore, understanding students' activities and outcomes in the library is important to support students' learning performance and wellbeing through built environments.

This study uses a mixed-method approach as a follow-up study to Y. Kim et al.'s study (2021) .

The previous study collected 66 responses through a survey in October 2019 and aimed to understand students' space use and environmental effects on their learning performance. The results showed the students' library space use pattern (i.e., space choice depending on their activity) before the pandemic. The respondents reported the type of their space usage, including 1) solitary work, 2) working as a group, and 3) working alone but staying together. Additionally, they were asked to choose where they stayed between 1) open-plan space for individual study and 2) open-plan space for group work. This follow-up study interviewed 12 students to examine their perceptions of library environments depending on their activities and experiences in the library during the pandemic and what they expected after the pandemic. A qualitative approach can be helpful to gather rich data on user experience (Navarro-Bringas et al., 2020; Sankari et al., 2018) . Figure 1 shows the data collection process and library operations in a timeline. 

Semi-structured interviews were conducted between July 2021 and September 2021, and 12 students participated in the interview. For recruitment, the researchers invited students at Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, GA to participate in the interview via email and recruited other participants using a snowball sampling method. Interviews were performed either online or in-person in one of the meeting rooms in the library, according to the interviewees' preference. In order to clarify the spaces that the interviewer and interviewees mentioned, photos of the library spaces were provided as supplementary materials during the interview. Before starting each interview, the interviewer informed the objectives of the study, J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f consent, and anticipated benefits from the interview. Each interview was between 30 and 60 mins and was recorded. A $10 gift card was given as compensation. The interviews aimed to understand students' library space use during the pandemic and their intentions to use the space after the pandemic. The questions focused on students' learning activities, library space types, physical and functional features of the library, and desired outcomes of the students in the library. Interviews are an effective method to know space usage because they enable the researchers to know students' learning activities beyond the type of space usage (i.e., solitary and group use). The example list of activities included the four different types of collaborative knowledge creation activities of college students suggested by Lee and Schottenfeld (2014) : focusing, group learning, collaborating, and socializing. Library spaces were categorized into five types: 1) open-plan spaces for individual study, 2) open-plan spaces for group work, 3) individual study spaces with carrels, 4) meeting rooms, and 5) lounge spaces. Students were asked to identify and describe the spaces they had used previously. For ea ch activity i n the list, can you choose where you would like to do each work i n the library? Phys i cal and functi onal envi ronments I wi l l give you several keywords related to your experience a t the library. Pl ease describe each space us i ng the keywords that a re associated.

-Phys i cal environments: Furniture, window view, temperature, quiet/noisy, background noise, l i ghting, resources -Functi onal environments: Col laboration, crowdedness, concentration, visual privacy, a coustic pri va cy Des ired outcomes Is there anything you want to change to better s upport your performance i n the library? How? Why?

Wha t ma kes you feel good i n the library? Is there s omething that you want to change to enhance and better s upport your well-being? How? Why? Overa l l experience Wha t do you like about the environment of the library? Wha t do you dislike a bout the environment of the l ibrary? COVID-19-related Duri ng the pandemic, have you ever used the spaces in the library? Wha t s paces did you use in the l ibrary? How was it? Do you have a ny reason that you chose those s pa ces? Are you goi ng to use the library differently compared to pre-pandemic?

Two targeted buildings of the library are Price Gilbert Library and Crosland Tower Library at Georgia Tech. They were fully renovated in 2019 and 2021, respectively, and the two buildings are connected. The library sought to create spaces for active collaboration, providing open-J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f planned spaces without partitions for most of the spaces. The spaces were categorized into five different types based on the physical learning environment taxonomy suggested by Beckers et al. (2015) [ Table 4 ]. As classrooms in the library can be used for reserved events only, they are excluded from the scope of this study. Photographs of the library spaces are provided in the Appendix. 

Open-plan s paces for group work

The s pace provides a big ta ble with va rious types of chairs such as s tools and benches. The size of the tables is conducive to group di s cussions. The space also offers whiteboards a nd screens to fa ci litate discussions, and students ca n freely ta lk to each other.

Indivi dual study a reas with carrels

The s pace is designed as a quiet s pace. The finishes use noisea bs orbing materials, a nd group meetings are not allowed. The cha i rs are ergonomically designed for prolonged periods of use.

Meeti ng rooms Sepa rate rooms i ntended for group meetings i nclude a whiteboard a nd a screen that facilitate discussion.

Hi gh

Lounge spaces The s pace encourages socializing and relaxing. This type of space is ea sily a ccessible a nd open.

Hi gh Hi gh

The library was closed between March 2020 and July 2020 because of the pandemic and has been open since August 2020 with some restrictions regarding social distancing, a requirement for wearing face masks, card-only access, limited space availability, reduced occupant capacity, and contactless services. Since June 2021, the library has been fully open without any restrictions.

Interview data were transcribed using Microsoft Word and analyzed using NVivo 12. The transcribed data were analyzed in the first and second cycles, as suggested by Saldaña (2016) .

In the first cycle, descriptive coding was conducted to label data with summarized words. In this process, a deductive approach was carried out to find space uses depending on their activities as well as physical and functional environmental features. The label was based on a literature review, including the type of spaces, possible activities, and keywords of indoor environmental features. In the second cycle, pattern codes were generated to identify any positive, negative, or neutral arguments about the environment. For inductive coding, only topics mentioned at least two times were used for analysis and provided in this paper. The interviewees only talked about spaces they had used before. The number of responses for each space was reported in parentheses in Figure 2 .

less frequently than before the pandemic and mostly used the spaces individually. The students also mentioned that it was convenient to find spaces they liked because of fewer users in the library than in the pre-pandemic period. The reasons that students used the library less were because they were not on campus, and there was a fear of COVID-19 infection. On the other hand, the reasons they came to the library during the pandemic were to change scenery, get out of their rooms, or go to a café in the library. For the post-pandemic use, all students except one graduating student responded that they would use the library similar to the pre-pandemic, coming back to the library to use physical spaces with other people like pre-pandemic times or even more often.

For the post-pandemic period, they reported specific spatial preferences for each activity [ Figure 2 ]. They chose library spaces depending on their intention/activities, and those who identified themselves as active users tended to use multiple spaces in the building. Students mostly preferred the open-plan space for individual study but would use any space for individual study. For group learning and collaboration, students preferred either meeting rooms or open-plan spaces for group learning. They also preferred major-specific academic buildings outside the library. The interviews found that meeting rooms were used for various purposes, such as meetings, group study, individual study, presentation rehearsals, podcast recording, and instrument lessons. On the other hand, two students stated they would choose online meetings as an alternative to in-person meetings.

It is multi-functional use, so whenever I need a place, the library is always the best place for me to be looking for because they have got everything I need and every functional space that I need. [Interviewee 1] For socializing, students would go to lounges. However, some students did not consider a library as a space for socializing even though they came and used the library with their friends. They would go somewhere else to hang out with their friends but also needed a space to go when they unexpectedly met someone in the library. Similarly, relaxing was not why students found the library, but space and furniture for relaxing seemed helpful for students to spend a long time studying. In addition, views to the outside provided students time to relax. Some students mentioned that having coffee and food from the café helped them stay in the library longer.

J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f 

Students described each space using six physical environmental features based on the list provided by the researchers. Physical environments were identified differently depending on the type of spaces [ Table 5 ]. In addition to the features provided, students also mentioned outdoor seating in general for both studying and relaxing. Socializing (8) Collaborating (10) Group learning (10) Individual study (11) Open plan space for individual study Open plan space for groups Individual study space with carrels

J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f For open-plan spaces for individual study, the students described that window views helped them feel "productive," "happy," "relaxed." Even though there were big windows in the open-plan space for group work, no one mentioned window views in that space. For individual study spaces with carrels and meeting rooms, the window view was very limited, but the students emphasized that having a view was important because they could feel relaxed. Similarly, one student mentioned that placing natural plants indoors would be helpful for their mental health in the library. 4.2.2. Background noise. The students reported an appropriate level of background noise in the open-plan spaces for individual study and group work as well as lounge spaces. However, they also mentioned that there was no background noise in the quiet zone for individual study, and sometimes small sounds distracted them.

Opinions about quietness differed depending on the type of space. Students were satisfied with the noise level for the individual study space, while they mentioned that the space for group work and lounge was sometimes noisy. Some students said that the space for group work was not quiet but not distracting either. Otherwise, people who did not prefer the library wanted to have a quiet space. Traditional libraries were likely to be quiet, encouraging focus and individual study and providing physical resources such as books, while the concept of the modern academic library encourages active communication in the building.

Lighting was mentioned in two aspects: 1) amount of lighting and 2) natural lighting. Students emphasized the importance of proper lighting for their study, while natural lighting is important for both their positive mood and performance.

Journal Pre-proof 4.2.5. Furniture. Even though the preferred furniture type was different for each student, they liked the variety of furniture provided in the library. The students mentioned furniture in two different ways: 1) a variety of types and 2) comfort. For open-plan space for group work, students specifically mentioned various furniture types and availability to move them. However, one of the main complaints that students reported was the unavailability of seats they wanted and that sometimes it was hard to know where they could be found. The comfort of the furniture was important for long-term use. On the other hand, for individual study spaces with carrels and meeting rooms, the students highlighted ergonomic chairs in the spaces that were appropriate for prolonged use. 4.2.6. Resources. Students pointed out the limited resources in the open-plan space for individual use as the only resource the space provided was electrical outlets. However, they were satisfied with the availability of outlets in every space in the library. They mentioned that whiteboards in the open-plan space for group work and meeting rooms were useful when studying with friends or working on group projects. Some students noted that there were no books in the library. They wanted the books back as they made them feel relaxed. It was also that books were an important signifier for a library.

Students explained the functional features of each space [ Table 6 ]. Like physical environments, functional environments were also differently reported depending on the spaces in the library. There was no acoustic privacy in the other spaces, but the students reported that they were not concerned with that when studying. Individual study spaces with carrels and meeting rooms provided enough visual privacy. Interestingly, some students were concerned that having a high level of visual privacy could make them too comfortable and spend time browsing the internet and social media.

Collaboration was required for group learning. Students found the ease of collaboration in the open-plan space for group work and meeting rooms. However, they said having an academic conversation in the lounge was difficult as it was too noisy with high traffic. Students also hesitated to collaborate in the open-plan space for individual study and individual study space with carrels because those spaces were intended to be quiet.

Students reported crowdedness when many different activities were happening, especially in the open-plan space for group work and lounge spaces. Some students also mentioned crowdedness in meeting rooms when the room was full. As a result, they preferred larger rooms even though the expected number of people in the room was one or two. This consequently led to difficulty in reserving a meeting room, causing another reason for crowdedness. 4.3.5. Socialization. Socialization was mentioned mostly regarding the lounge space, but students added that they could not concentrate or study in that space. Some students thought that individual study spaces with carrels was not for socialization because of the partitions and quiet atmosphere. For the other spaces, they often use those spaces to study alone but be together and be able to interact with others.

In addition to the physical and functional environmental features discussed in the previous sections, the students also mentioned some facility-level factors associated with their performance or wellbeing in the library [ Table 7 ]. Rules. Students commonly expected some spaces specifically aimed for certain activities to work as intended, and they complained when the spaces did not. For example, they expected quiet in the quiet zones (some open-plan spaces for individual study) and individual study spaces with carrels. As another example, the meeting rooms were supposed to be used according to the number of users, but small groups sometimes reserved big rooms. It consequently led to two problems; 1) small rooms are left unused and 2) big groups could not use any rooms.

As the library served various functions, students were able to choose where they stayed and studied. They knew what environment they needed, and each environment could support students' expectations.

The purpose of the library itself affected students' study performance in the building. For example, they said they liked people in the space to study or work concentrating on their own tasks, which they found motivating. 4.4.5. Sense of belonging. Most of the students felt a sense of belonging through a studyfriendly atmosphere and rarely mentioned space specifically. The students felt a sense of belonging by being around other students in the same space as they were. It was one of the important factors that made students physically come to the library. 4.4.6. Outdoor seating. The outdoor seating was not mentioned on the list given to the students, but five out of twelve students independently mentioned the benefits of using outdoor seating during the interviews. They said they would study, relax, and enjoy views and natural light outside.

J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f

This study explored the physical and functional environments of the academic library and investigated the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on students' activities in the library. The finding showed the change in activities during the pandemic, including the reduced frequency and type of usage. The students used the physical spaces in the library fewer times during the pandemic. As they had experienced virtual settings for attending classes, meetings, collaborating with other students, and socializing, a decrease in the use of the physical spaces was expected (Low & Smart, 2020; Wexler & Oberlander, 2021) . Interestingly, however, the interviews in this study revealed that the students would use the library spaces after the pandemic as much as in the pre-pandemic period or more often; the most frequently mentioned reason for library use was to defeat social isolation. Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, it was reported that between 20 and 71% of late adolescents and young adults aged 15 to 21 years experienced feeling lonely sometimes or often and overcame the loneliness by reconnecting and socializing with their friends (Qualter et al., 2015) . The pandemic disturbed inperson socialization among students on campus, made them feel isolated and anxious, and accelerated their mental problems in terms of depression (Fruehwirth et al., 2021) . A community can be built when people with different interests come to use and share the same space and tools (Schopfel et al., 2015) , so library spaces on campus can significantly contribute to building a sense of community among students. Engaging with friends and spending time together can increase the perception of enhanced social support and consequently strengthen their mental health (Hefner & Eisenberg, 2009 ). This study supports that physical spaces on campus play an important role in increasing social support. Therefore, students preferred to come to the library to use the space physically and be around other people. Even though they used the library during the pandemic, this study observed different space use patterns. The students tended to use the space individually, consistent with the observation study by Jens and Gregg (2021) . In addition, the students reported that they could easily find the seats they preferred during the pandemic because there were fewer people in the building. The low number of people in the space possibly enabled them to have enough distance from other people, keeping themselves safer with social distancing.

Depending on their needs, students' space usage can be explained by the learning space model (Beckers et al., 2015) and the student learning process (Lee & Schottenfeld, 2014) . First, students preferred the open-plan space for individual study mostly for focusing, which requires high self-regulation and low social interaction. This preference was observed pre-pandemic as well (Y. Kim et al., 2021) . Similarly, the individual study spaces with carrels were also used for focusing. Both types of spaces (i.e., carrel spaces and open-plan spaces for individual study) were appropriate for the same learning activities in terms of self-regulation and interaction so that students might choose spaces based on their preference for the partition, furniture, or view to the outside. Second, group learning requires high social interaction, so the students used the open-plan space for groups or meeting rooms, depending on the needs of resources and privacy. Third, collaborating requires a high level of social interaction. Similar to group learning, most students preferred the open-plan space for groups and meeting rooms. Lastly, the students used lounge spaces, meeting rooms, and open-plan spaces for groups for socializing. Notably, students did not like to use the library primarily as a space to socialize, but J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f they felt a sense of belonging when they were around other people or came to the library with their friends even though they studied alone but together. Similarly, relaxing is also not the main purpose of the library. Lounge spaces were not preferred for study, but those spaces could provide an opportunity to relax and socialize while taking regular and purposeful study breaks, which help maintain energy and the ability to focus (Waxman et al., 2007) . Notably, some students reported interesting opinions on privacy and quietness. Previous studies have found and argued that having privacy and a quiet environment is critical for focus work and study (Beckers et al., 2016b; Ellison, 2016) , but, from the interview in this study, too much privacy sometimes distracts students from studying. Students who had a low ability for self-regulated learning tended to avoid the space with carrel and to study in an open-plan space. The reason to use open-plan spaces for individual studying is that there is a little interruption of visual privacy that helps them to keep focusing on studying. Self-regulated learning requires students' active involvement in learning and the ability to control their cognition and surrounding environment (Pintrich, 2004 (2017), students are also disturbed by background noise frequently when studying for an exam, reading, and writing, while the noise had an insignificant effect on brainstorming, consulting, and searching. Furthermore, there was little difference in collaboration performance between quiet conditions and background noise scenarios (Braat-Eggen et al., 2019) . In this study, the students were satisfied with background noises in all open-plan study spaces regardless of the target activities of the spaces. For example, in the spaces for group work, students expected noise from others' conversations and could make noise themselves without concern about disturbing other people. On the other hand, students did not expect any loud noise in the quiet zone. They sometimes avoided a space that was too quiet because they were worried about making any unexpected noise that might capture others' attention. In other words, based on their expectations, students can perceive the background noise differently. Having explicit rules about space uses (e.g., collaboration space, quiet zone) may support study performance by helping them have appropriate expectations and behave accordingly. Seats by the window are preferred areas in a library (DeClercq & Cranz, 2014) . Most of the students in this study also positively mentioned the presence of windows. Interestingly, their need for windows manifested differently according to the types of spaces. Even though both spaces for individual study and group work had a window wall, the students rarely mentioned the window in the space for group work, whereas students using the space with carrels or meeting rooms tended to appreciate window views much more. One of the possible reasons is that both types of spaces had a relatively small workstation size with closed partitions or wall s providing higher privacy. Having windows in an enclosed and small space possibly made the students feel that the rooms were more spacious. In addition, natural light is an important source to maintain circadian rhythms (Aguilar-Carrasco et al., 2021), but it is hard to get exposure to natural light in spaces with carrels and meeting rooms. It may consequently lead people to desire more windows. The effect of window presence should be further explored, J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f considering occupant activities and space arrangements. Windows are also an important source of allowing natural lights indoors. An appropriate amount of lighting enhances performance in the workplace (Brunia et al., 2016) , but the effect of natural lighting and window views in academic settings is little known. In this study, the students mentioned that natural lighting with window views helped enhance students' wellbeing and performance. This result also provides possible evidence of restoration effects, which benefit cognitive ability and stress relief from exposure to nature through windows (Hipp et al., 2016; Li & Sullivan, 2016; van Esch et al., 2019) . Therefore, providing natural lighting through windows in study spaces can provide a restoration effect and enhance student performance and well-being in a library. Notably, crowdedness was negatively mentioned in most types of spaces. In open-plan spaces, the students easily noticed people walking around and chatting and reported crowdedness. They reported that too many things were happening around them, and they felt too crowded to collaborate on a group work/ project in the open-plan spaces and lounge spaces. Crowdedness is related to privacy and disruption by noise (Kaya & Weber, 2003; D. Kim et al., 2020) ; so, even for the open-plan space, design strategies such as appropriate furniture arrangement and dividing spaces by partitions would be helpful to give them a supportive environment for learning by decreasing the frequency of social encounters. Some students also mentioned the availability of seats in relation to crowdedness. If they could not find preferred or appropriate seats for their activities, the students felt the space was crowded. This qualitative approach provides a deeper understanding of the subject library, following the previous study (Y. Kim et al., 2021) , which utilized a survey method. The findings of this study also corroborate that open-plan spaces can support various learning activities of students by adopting different space arrangement strategies in academic libraries. Open-plan spaces are flexible in space arrangement, so they benefit under abnormal situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic (Jens & Gregg, 2021b) . It was observed that the space utilization of open-plan spaces is much higher than in enclosed spaces in an academic building, while suitability, spatial integration, user satisfaction were similar to each other (Jens & Gregg, 2021a) .

The main limitations to this study are the small sample size and generalizability due to its qualitative, case study approach. Even though the interview method enabled this study to explore diverse opinions about their library use from the students, the nature of the method inherently has limited ability to test statistical significance. Additionally, this study should be repeatedly performed in similar settings to find the generalizability.

As a follow-up study, this study explored student perception of academic libraries during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study showed that students would be willing to come to academic libraries to use the physical spaces and to meet other people after the pandemic. Traditionally, academic libraries provide a learning opportunity through physical resources, such as books, journal articles, and other materials, for their users. However, libraries, especially academic libraries, are recently evolving by removing physical books and focusing on providing commons spaces. Even though some people still find the value of the library in physical materials, it is time to realize the meaning and purpose of libraries in their communities, as discussed in this study. Modern library spaces on campus, which often afford various activities, such as focused work, group learning, collaborating on class projects, J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f socializing, and relaxing, can significantly contribute to building a sense of community among college students and help them reconnect with their peers. These modern academic libraries are likely to play a major role in providing a comfortable venue to study, collaborate, and interact with each other throughout their college lives. Future studies should examine the link between physical and functional environments in different spaces and find the appropriate environment for each activity in academic libraries. Furthermore, students would use the library spaces for their different learning activities. The results of this study support the great possibility of enhancing the perceived study performance and wellbeing of students through the environments in the library. For this, understanding students' activities and preferred spaces is critical for new construction and major renovation of libraries and continuous improvement with smaller changes, such as furniture reconfiguration, space assignment and planning, and user policy (i.e., collaboration vs. quiet zones). As the size of the building is limited, investigating the needs of space types is required to strategically provide spaces in various sizes and types based on appropriate space programming.

Indoor lighting design for healthier workplaces: natural and electric light assessment for suitable circadian stimulus

A conceptual framework to identify spatial implications of new ways of learning in higher education

Learning space preferences of higher education students

Why do they study there? Diary research into students' learning space choices in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development

The effects of a task facilitating working environment on office space use, communication, collaboration, privacy and distraction

Auditory distraction in open-plan study environments: Effects of background speech and reverberation time on a collaboration task

Noise disturbance in open-plan study environments: a field study on noise sources, student tasks and room acoustic parameters

Accommodating new ways of working: lessons from best practices and worst cases

Academic libraries and social and learning space: A case study of Loughborough university library

Communication, collaboration and contagion

What matters for students' use of physical library space

The role of space attributes in space-choice behaviour and satisfaction in an academic library

A framework for planning academic library spaces

COVID-19: 20 countries' higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses

Moving beyond seating-centered learning environments: Opportunities and challenges identified in a POE of a campus library

Re-placed" -Reconsidering relationships with place and lessons from a pandemic

Designing the learning spaces of a university library

The Covid-19 pandemic and mental health of first-year college students: Examining the effect of Covid-19 stressors using longitudinal data

Benefits of quiet workspaces in open-plan offices -Evidence from two office relocations

A study exploring learners' informal learning space behaviors, attitudes, and preferences

Post-occupancy evaluation of academic and research library facilities

Social support and mental health among college students

The relationship between perceived greenness and perceived restorativeness of university campuses and student-reported quality of life

Indoor environment and student productivity for individual and collaborative work in learning commons: a case study

Building performances in open and enclosed spaces: a method for balancing operational costs and space utilization with a focus on user needs and satisfaction. Architectural Engineering and Design Management

The impact on human behaviour in shared building spaces as a result of COVID-19 restrictions

Cross-cultural differences in the perception of crowding and privacy regulation: American and Turkish students

Alone with others: Understanding physical environmental needs of students within an academic library setting

Perceived productivity in open-plan design library: Exploring occupant behavior and perception

User-focused office renovation: a review into user satisfaction and the potential for improvement

Collaborative activities and library indoor environmental quality affecting performance, health, and well-being of different library user groups in higher education

Collaborative knowledge creation in the higher education academic library

Impact of views to school landscapes on recovery from stress and mental fatigue

Thoughts about public space during Covid-19 pandemic

Case study: developing campus spaces through co-creation

Indoor environmental quality assessment in a learning space: University of Malaya's main library

Belonging, the physical space of the university campus and how it is perceived by students: a quantitative analysis among a diverse student group

Embracing complexity: a sociotechnical systems approach for the design and evaluation of higher education learning environments

A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation

A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students

Loneliness across the life span

Evaluating the impact of learning space

The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers

A call for co-working -users' expectations regarding learning spaces in higher education

Co-working and innovation: New concepts for academic libraries and learning centres

Learning and knowing in networks: Changing roles for educators and designers

The influence of school architecture on academic achievement

Office window views: View features trump nature in predicting employee well-being

The library as place Providing students with opportunities for socialization, relaxation, and restoration

COVID-19 as a super crisis: implications for place management

Library transformation in higher education

Planning library spaces and services for Millennials: An evidence-based approach

Appendix A. Example photographs of each space type