key: cord-0948357-c950u1id
authors: Sørengaard, Torhild Anita; Saksvik-Lehouillier, Ingvild
title: Associations between burnout symptoms and sleep among workers during the COVID-19 pandemic
date: 2022-02-07
journal: Sleep Med
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2022.01.022
sha: 3eaad227ba9f7478afdbd7f07043bd91c2c9fb96
doc_id: 948357
cord_uid: c950u1id

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the relations between underlying dimensions of burnout (i.e. exhaustion, mental distance, cognitive impairment and emotional impairment) and sleep reactivity in occupations that have critical tasks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sleep reactivity refers to the vulnerability of experiencing sleep disturbances during challenging conditions, and manifests as difficulties with falling and staying asleep. Previous research has highlighted the importance investigating psychological factors that may influence or trigger vulnerability to stress induced sleep problems, including factors at work. METHODS: Longitudinal self-report data was collected using an online survey administered to Norwegian workers employed in health care, education, social services, emergency services and other sectors with critical tasks during the COVID-19 pandemic at two different time points three months apart. The sample in the present study (N = 1331) consisted of 76% females and 24% males with a mean age of 44 years. RESULTS: The results showed that work-related exhaustion measured at baseline was the strongest symptom of burnout associated with higher sleep reactivity three months later, followed by emotional impairment. Mental distance and cognitive impairment at work was not associated with sleep reactivity, indicating that these burnout dimensions have less of an impact on sleep than exhaustion and emotional impairment. CONCLUSION: Work-related exhaustion and emotional impairment can lower the individual’s tolerance to perceiving events as stressful as well as reinforce the stress response, and contribute to difficulties with initiating and/or maintaining sleep. Workers employed in occupations with critical tasks during the pandemic may be more susceptible to exhaustion, emotional strain and poorer sleep due to increased and prolonged work pressure during the pandemic. Organizational and individual measures that can decrease stress and increase coping should be offered to employees working in high-stress conditions.

A growing number of studies show that sleep disturbances is a serious concern during the ongoing coronavirus disease pandemic (Gupta et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020; Voitsidis et al., 2020) . The pandemic inflicts strain on workers and the general population worldwide, which may contribute to an increased risk of stress related sleep disturbances (Kalmbach et al., 2018) . In turn, prolonged difficulties with sleep can have severe adverse effects on both mental and physical health (Baglioni et al., 2011; Fernandez-Mendoza & Vgontzas, 2013) . Sleep problems also influence the overall quality of life (Kyle, Morgan, & Espie, 2010) , and is considered a risk factor for future sickness absence and disability among workers (Sivertsen, Björnsdóttir, Øverland, Bjorvatn, & Salo, 2013; Sivertsen et al., 2009) .

Many researchers in the field of sleep disorders considers hyperarousal, i.e. elevated cognitive and physiological activation, as a core feature of insomnia (Bonnet & Arand, 2010) .

This concept is closely related to sleep reactivity, which refers to the degree of sleep disruption in response to various challenges (Drake, Friedman, Wright Jr, & Roth, 2011) . It manifests as difficulties with falling and staying asleep due to the individuals response to challenging events during the day, e.g. bad news, arguments or conflicts, important appointments and stressing events (Kalmbach et al., 2018) . High sleep reactivity increase the individuals vulnerability of experiencing insomnia during stressful conditions, and is believed to predispose the development and maintenance of insomnia (Drake & Roth, 2006) .

The stressors that can contribute to sleep reactivity and insomnia varies (Vedaa et al., 2016) , and ranges from individual and work factors to physiological and neurological issues.

Daily stressors is associated with elevated levels of pre-sleep arousal and poorer sleep (Winzeler et al., 2014) , which suggests that high stress conditions at work contribute to higher sleep reactivity as well as increased vulnerability to insomnia. Several occupational factors is related to sleep problems, including cognitive-and emotional demands, and more attention should be given to these factors (Bertrais, André, Bèque, Chastang, & Niedhammer, J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f 2020). Burnout is often defined as a state of physical, mental and emotional exhaustion caused by prolonged and excessive stress at work (Maslach & Schaufeli, 2017) . This syndrome is closely related to chronic stress at work, can contribute to the onset and maintenance of sleep disorders, including insomnia (Armon, Shirom, Shapira, & Melamed, 2008; Pagnin et al., 2014) . Dysregulation of the physiological response to stress and excessive stress hormones, i.e. cortisol, has been linked burnout, sleep reactivity as well as insomnia (Rothe, Steffen, Penz, Kirschbaum, & Walther, 2020; Vargas et al., 2018) , bringing the concepts close together. We do, however, lack knowledge about which aspects or dimensions of burnout that is related to an increased risk of sleep problems and higher sleep reactivity.

A new conceptualization of burnout proposed by Schaufeli, De Witte, and Desart (2020) defines the underlying dimensions of burnout as exhaustion, mental distance, cognitive impairment and emotional impairment. These dimensions have not been investigated in relation to sleep reactivity so far and may shed new light on which aspects of burnout that contribute to difficulties with sleeping during the pandemic. High emotional and physical exhaustion at work are related to sleep complaints, whereas low levels of exhaustion can contribute to good sleep (Brand et al., 2010) . Cognitive-and emotional hyperarousal have shown to be strongly related to insomnia (Fernández-Mendoza et al., 2010) , further stressing the importance of examining the underlying dimensions of burnout, which includes cognitive and emotional impairment at work in particular, in relation to sleep reactivity. Both cognitive and emotional demands seem to be important for sleep among workers, and positive emotions at work is especially important for good sleep quality (Loft & Cameron, 2014) .

The pandemic has put unprecedented strain on workers in occupations that maintain critical societal functions worldwide, and it is important to investigate and monitor the associations between burnout and sleep disturbances in these occupations. Previous research J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f has called for investigation of psychological factors that may influence or trigger vulnerability to stress induced sleep problems (Jarrin, Chen, Ivers, Drake, & Morin, 2016) , this includes psychological factors at work. More specific, we need to broaden our knowledge and understanding about how symptoms of burnout are related to sleep reactivity and disturbances. The present study seeks to answer this call and investigate underlying dimensions of burnout, i.e. exhaustion, mental distance, cognitive and emotional impairment, and their relationship to sleep reactivity among workers in occupations with critical tasks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our central hypothesis is that symptoms of burnout will be associated with higher sleep reactivity. Knowledge of these relations will be valuable when designing organizational and individual measures aimed at preventing and reducing sleep difficulties related to stress at work, especially during the pandemic and in the aftermath.

The following paper is based on longitudinal self-report data from employees in occupations within critical sectors (e.g. health, education, welfare, social and emergency services) in central Norway during the COVID-19 pandemic. The participants were invited by their work e-mail to participate in the study and answer an online survey administered in June 2020 (Time 1), and again in October (Time 2) the same year. The study was approved by the Norwegian Centre of Research Data and Regional Committees for Medical and Health Ethics in Norway, and the participants provided informed electronic consent before participating in the study.

A total of 1331 participants provided their informed consent to participate and answered the questionnaire at baseline. Of those who participated at baseline, 667 (50%) also answered the J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f follow-up questionnaire four months later. The sample consisted of 76% females and 24% males with a mean age of 43.65 years (range 18-68, SD = 11.36). The participants were employed in education (40%), the health care sector (19%), labour-and welfare services (16%), social and family services (11%), management and property (9%), and police, fire and rescue services (5%).

The questionnaires contained items measuring demographic and background variables, work time schedule, psychosocial work factors, insomnia, and mental and physical health. Sleep reactivity was measured at follow-up (Time 2), whereas the other variables included in the present study was measured at baseline (Time 1).

comprising of nine items that measures the individuals likelihood of experiencing difficulties sleeping in response to stressful events and situations (Drake, Richardson, Roehrs, Scofield, & Roth, 2004) . Example of situations are a bad day at work, before an important meeting the next day and after a stressful experience at night. Answers were given on a four-point Likert scale and summed to a total score ranging from 9 (low sleep reactivity) to 36 (high sleep reactivity). The instrument have shown good psychometric properties in previous research (Jarrin et al., 2016) . The scales internal consistency in the present study was high (α = .86).

Burnout dimensions. The four underlying dimensions of burnout; exhaustion, mental distance, cognitive impairment and emotional impairment was measured with the 12-item version of the Burnout Assessment Tool (Schaufeli et al., 2020) . Example of items are "After a day at work, I find it hard to recover my energy" (exhaustion), "I feel a strong aversion towards my job" (mental distance), "At work I may overreact unintentionally" (emotional impairment) and "When I am working I have trouble concentrating (cognitive impairment).

The answers were given on a 5-point Likert frequency scale ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always), which was used to calculate mean scores. The internal consistency was high for exhaustion, cognitive impairment and emotional impairment (α = .82-.85), and acceptable for mental distance (α = .71).

Insomnia. The Bergen Insomnia Scale (BIS) was used to measure insomnia (Pallesen et al., 2008) . The participants were asked to indicate how many days a week (0-7) during the last month they have struggled with six specific symptoms of insomnia (i.e. sleep onset, sleep maintenance, early morning awakening, not feeling adequately rested, daytime impairment and dissatisfaction with current sleep). The continuous sum scale ranges from 0 to 42. The

Bergen Insomnia Scale has shown good convergent and discriminative validity in previous studies (Pallesen et al., 2008) , and is a widely used measure of insomnia. The internal consistency for insomnia was high (α = .84).

The statistical analyses were performed in IBM SPSS (version 27). Pearson correlation analysis was used to examine correlations between all variables included in the present study.

Relations between sleep reactivity measured at follow-up as dependent variable and exhaustion, mental distance, cognitive impairment and emotional impairment measured at baseline was examined with multiple regression analysis. The first model included age and gender as control variables, whereas the second model also included exhaustion, mental distance, cognitive impairment and emotional impairment. The final model adjusted for insomnia measured at baseline to control for the effects of initial symptoms of insomnia on sleep reactivity. Table 1 show descriptive statistics and correlations for all variables included in the present study. The scores on sleep reactivity (i.e. vulnerability to insomnia in response to stressful events) ranged from 9 to 36 for all the participants, with a mean value of 20.35 (SD = 6.12).

Further, sleep reactivity had positive associations to gender (i.e. females scored higher than males), job demands, work stress, work-related exhaustion and insomnia. Age was negatively associated with sleep reactivity. .19** -.14** .44** .28** .21** .29** .44** -*p < .05 **p < .01 a 0 = male, 1 = female 

The present study showed that the burnout dimensions work exhaustion and emotional impairment at work was associated with future high sleep reactivity, i.e. increased vulnerability of experiencing sleep disturbances during stressful conditions. These effects remained significant even after including insomnia measured at baseline in the final regression model. Mental distance and cognitive impairment had no association to sleep reactivity, indicating that exhaustion and emotional impairment at work are the two main underlying dimensions of burnout contributing to higher sleep reactivity and subsequent elevated risk of sleep problems following stressful conditions at work. Hence, our central hypothesis was partly supported.

The strongest positive relationship in the present study was between work-related exhaustion and sleep reactivity. Prolonged exhaustion among workers often a result of chronic stress at work that has not been successfully coped, and can contribute to difficulties with sleep (Armon et al., 2008; Pagnin et al., 2014) . A possible explanation is that exhaustion lower the individual's tolerance to stressful events as well as reinforce their stress response, and thus contribute to higher sleep reactivity and difficulties with initiating sleep. This is supported by previous research, which have found that exhaustion can be related to dysfunctional stress response (Jönsson et al., 2015) , including exaggerating the individuals susceptibility to perceiving an event as stressful. Pre-sleep arousal is related to increased difficulties with sleeping and shorter sleep (Loft & Cameron, 2014) , which can explain why exhaustion can make it harder to fall asleep following stressful events. A common belief is that exhausted individuals tend to sleep more to compensate for feeling drained of energy, but previous research has demonstrated that exhaustion can contribute to poor sleep (Brand et al., 2010) .

Dysfunctional emotional reactivity can lead to hyperarousal before sleep and contribute to sleep problems like insomnia (Baglioni, Spiegelhalder, Lombardo, & Riemann, 2010) , which can explain why work-related emotional impairment was associated to higher sleep reactivity in the present study. Difficulties with regulating emotions connected to work can contribute to delayed processing of emotions, and may lead individuals to having to deal with these emotions closer to bedtime instead of processing them efficiently at work or during daytime. Activation of negative emotions and high emotional arousal before sleep is related to impaired sleep (Fairholme & Manber, 2015) , which again can affect emotional regulation the following day. Good sleep, on the other hand, reduce aversive emotional reactions to stressful stimuli (Deliens, Gilson, & Peigneux, 2014) . Hence, the relation between emotional impairment at work and sleep reactivity may be closely linked and multidirectional in nature. This finding highlights the need for acknowledging the importance of emotions at work during the pandemic, as well as further investigation of how the pandemic and related consequences can affect emotional functioning in workers during a prolonged crisis.

The findings in this study enables targeting of specific symptoms of burnout when combatting the effects of work stress on employee sleep in organizations, as well as highlights the close association between emotional reactivity and sleep (Kahn, Sheppes, & Sadeh, 2013; Shen, van Schie, Ditchburn, Brook, & Bei, 2018) . Sleep is a fundamental need that can affect the workers wellbeing, health and safety (Litwiller, Snyder, Taylor, & Steele, 2017) , and organisations should strive to prevent sleep problems related to the employees' work. Exhaustion, emotional impairment, and poor sleep are not just concerns limited to the individual employee. These factors can also affect the employee's performance and relations to others, making it crucial to prevent exhaustion and dysfunctional emotional functioning J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f due to high work strain in the organisation. Previous research has shown that high job demands and work stress are important antecedents for symptoms of burnout (Demerouti, Bakker, Nachreiner, & Schaufeli, 2001; Österberg, Skogsliden, & Karlson, 2014) , and perceiving work as exhausting can be more decisive than the overall level of demands (Steiber & Pichler, 2015) . Hence, high work strain can have an adverse effect on sleep through its effect on work-related exhaustion and emotional impairment. The level of stress and demands at work should thus be considered when designing organisational measures aimed at reducing exhaustion and improving emotional functioning among employees during the pandemic.

Offering employees courses in positive coping strategies (e.g. seeking and giving social support) and effective emotional processing can heighten the level of knowledge and awareness of these factors in the organisation, making it easier for the employees themselves to detect and cope with symptoms of burnout at an earlier stage. These are important preventive measures for the organizations to both consider and offer during and after the pandemic. Symptoms of burnout and sleep problems are on the rise among frontline workers (Azoulay et al., 2020; Matsuo et al., 2020; Sørengaard & Saksvik-Lehouillier, 2021) , and it is vital to address these issues to avoid potential short-and long-term consequences in both the working and general population (Shah, Chaudhari, Kamrai, Lail, & Patel, 2020) .

The present study follows a longitudinal design with multiple points of measurement, which strengthen the predictive value of the findings. Although the initial response rate was low, the follow-up rate of 50% was satisfying and provided a sufficient sample for the purpose of this study. Due to strict time limitations on the questionnaires, the study applied the short form version the Burnout Assessment Tool to measure underlying dimensions of burnout.

J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f However, the short version of this instrument has been validated in previous research and is considered a reliable measure of work-related exhaustion (Schaufeli et al., 2020) . A limitation of the survey is that it did not include questions about previous infection, which could have influenced the respondents sleep and level of stress and burnout symptoms. Further, the potential seasonal differences in sleep and mood were not accounted for in this study. The results in the present study can also have been influenced by common method and self-report bias related to the use of questionnaires (Donaldson & Grant-Vallone, 2002; Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Lee, & Podsakoff, 2003) , and the conclusions could have been strengthened by also applying other-reports and objective measures, i. e. physiological measure of arousal before sleep. However, self-report was the most appropriate method in the present study in terms of assessing factors that might only be accessible to the individual themselves, e.g. how they feel and think (Conway & Lance, 2010) , as well as the strict infection control and social restrictions during the pandemic.

Work exhaustion and emotional impairment among workers in critical occupations during the COVID-19 pandemic can contribute to higher sleep reactivity and subsequent sleep disturbances. Mental distance and cognitive impairment at work were not associated with sleep reactivity, indicating that these burnout dimensions have less of an impact on sleep than exhaustion and emotional impairment. Acknowledging that workers during the pandemic may be more susceptible to exhaustion, impaired emotional functioning and higher sleep reactivity due to high work strain is an important step in preventing future health problems, sickness absence and disability in occupations with critical tasks both during and after the pandemic.

J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f

On the nature of burnoutinsomnia relationships: A prospective study of employed adults

Symptoms of burnout in intensive care unit specialists facing the COVID-19 outbreak

Insomnia as a predictor of depression: a meta-analytic evaluation of longitudinal epidemiological studies

Sleep and emotions: a focus on insomnia

Associations between multiple occupational exposures and sleep problems: Results from the national French Working Conditions survey

Associations between satisfaction with life, burnout-related emotional and physical exhaustion, and sleep complaints

What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research

Sleep and the processing of emotions

The job demandsresources model of burnout

Understanding self-report bias in organizational behavior research

Vulnerability to stress-related sleep disturbance and hyperarousal

Sleep reactivity and insomnia: Genetic and environmental influences

Predisposition in the evolution of insomnia: evidence, potential mechanisms, and future directions

Sleep, emotions, and emotion regulation: an overview

Cognitive-emotional hyperarousal as a premorbid characteristic of individuals vulnerable to insomnia

Insomnia and its impact on physical and mental health

Changes in sleep pattern and sleep quality during COVID-19 lockdown

Temporal stability of the Ford insomnia response to stress test (FIRST)

Exhaustion-related changes in cardiovascular and cortisol reactivity to acute psychosocial stress

Sleep and emotions: bidirectional links and underlying mechanisms

Hyperarousal and sleep reactivity in insomnia: Current insights

Insomnia and health-related quality of life

COVID-19-related factors associated with sleep disturbance and suicidal thoughts among the Taiwanese public: A Facebook survey

The relationship between sleep and work: A meta-analysis

The importance of sleep: Relationships between sleep quality and work demands, the prioritization of sleep and pre-sleep arousal in daytime employees

Historical and conceptual development of burnout

Prevalence of health care worker burnout during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Japan

The relation between burnout and sleep disorders in medical students

A new scale for measuring insomnia: the Bergen Insomnia Scale

Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies

Examination of peripheral basal and reactive cortisol levels in major depressive disorder and the burnout syndrome: A systematic review

How essential is to focus on physician's health and burnout in coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic? Cureus

Positive and negative emotions: Differential associations with sleep duration and quality in adolescents

The joint contribution of insomnia and obstructive sleep apnoea on sickness absence

Insomnia and long sleep duration are risk factors for later work disability. The Hordaland Health Study

Trends in work stress and exhaustion in advanced economies

Insomnia among employees in occupations with critical societal functions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sleep medicine

Altered ultradian cortisol rhythmicity as a potential neurobiologic substrate for chronic insomnia

Prospective study of predictors and consequences of insomnia: personality, lifestyle, mental health, and work-related stressors

Diakogiannis, I. (2020). Insomnia during the COVID-19 pandemic in a Greek population

Daily stress, presleep arousal, and sleep in healthy young women: a daily life computerized sleep diary and actigraphy study

Neuropsychological sequelae of workstress-related exhaustion