key: cord-0944270-loz7oi90
authors: Solari-Twadell, P. Ann; Flinter, Margaret; Rambur, Betty; Renda, Susan; Witwer, Stephanie; Vanhook, Patricia; Poghosyan, Lusine
title: The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Future of Telehealth in Primary Care
date: 2021-09-24
journal: Nurs Outlook
DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2021.09.004
sha: 3860dfde37029a7336b58a176f1cd6676d3e736b
doc_id: 944270
cord_uid: loz7oi90

This consensus policy paper reviews the history, use and significance of telehealth in primary care. The emergence of telehealth as a primary strategy to continue to deliver value based, timely primary care during COVID-19 is discussed with recommendations for future applications, payment and preparation of providers to continue to provide quality care of clients in the future using telehealth.

High quality primary care is defined as -the provision of whole-person, integrated, accessible, and equitable health care by interprofessional teams that are accountable for addressing the majority of an individual's health and wellness needs across settings and through sustained relationships with patients, families, and communities (NASEM (a), 2021, p.

The COVID-19 pandemic radically transformed the delivery of primary care in the United States (U.S). In the face of a highly contagious virus, the fragility of the nation's reliance on inperson primary care was dramatically revealed, with implications for patient access to primary care, cost, and the financial sustainability of providers and primary care practices (Beau, Phillips, Phillips, Peterson and Landon, 2020) . Thus, to facilitate access to primary care for people and address revenue streams in primary care after the initial severe disruption, telehealth services regulations, administrative rules, payer policies, and reimbursement were modified almost overnight. Providers quickly adapted, and more patients have become acquainted with primary health care offered in the comfort of their home, a care delivery model that eliminates travel time and time-consuming waits in primary care practices. Virtual care and other forms of technology-enabled interactions provided fresh approaches to primary care and have the potential to be efficient, collaborative, cost-effective, and patient-centered. Taken as a whole, the acceptance by both patients and providers of primary care services via telehealth suggests that telehealth in some form and configuration is here to stay. Thus, the purpose of this manuscript is to discuss the implications for telehealth in primary care, benefits and barriers for patients and providers, considerations and cautions, as well as reforms needed to ensure appropriate and equitable availability of telehealth services post-COVID 19 pandemic. But first, what, exactly is telehealth?

The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) defines telehealth as the -use of electronic information and telecommunications technologies to support long-distance clinical health care, patient and professional health-related education, public health and health administration. Technologies include videoconferencing, the internet, store-and-forward imaging, streaming media and terrestrial and wireless communications. Telehealth is different from telemedicine. Telehealth refers to a broader scope of remote healthcare services than telemedicine. While telemedicine refers specifically to remote clinical services, telehealth can refer to remote non-clinical services, such as provider training, administrative meetings, and continuing medical education, in addition to clinical services‖ (Health IT, 2020, para 1, 2,) .

Today's telehealth finds its roots in telemedicine. Telemedicine spans nearly 100 years, beginning with the rudimentary idea of medical care being provided via radio with a television screen in 1924 (Myers, 2003) . In the early 1950s, telemedicine was formally introduced at the 1951 New York World's Fair. Subsequently, tele-radiology was initiated in 1957 with teleeducation, and tele-psychiatry following in 1959. Federal funding was provided to seven sites in the 1960s and 1970s for telemedicine research and development projects that were predominately in rural areas or targeted specific populations such as Native Americans in Arizona and Alaska (Zundel, 1996, p. 72) .

Telecommunications was implemented to manage the Mexico City disaster in 1985 employing satellite technology to support disaster recovery teams (Garshnek and Burkle, 1998) . At the same time, the U.S. and the United Socialist Soviet Republic created an international telemedicine project to monitor the health of astronauts in space exploration.

Another initiative, the Space Bridge Project was implemented for recovery efforts of the Armenian earthquake in 1988. Communication to the front-line was with four U.S. medical centers in Maryland, Houston, and Utah. These medical institutions provided real-time video consultation for sub-specialties in neurology, orthopedics, psychiatry, infectious diseases, and surgery (Garshnek and Burkle, 1999).

These early projects established the technological basis for telemedicine, demonstrating that telecommunications could be utilized as a substitute for travel to obtain medical care, as well as to provide specialized care during emergency situations (e.g. telestroke, teleICU, teleNICU). Nurses were always part of the team of health care professionals using this technology (Schweickert and Rutledge, 2020) . Now, the Internet has evolved into a nearly ubiquitous platform for health care. Internet-based services have expanded access to consumers for medical information, access to health care portals, use of an array of blue-tooth enabled devices and applications that download health information to personal websites or for sharing with health care professionals. The Internet provides a platform for researchers to collaborate, educate students and professionals of all educational backgrounds, and for medical professionals to conduct web-based visits with patients for consultation, preventive care, monitoring, diagnosis, and chronic condition management and support (National Quality Forum, 2017) .

Despite the history of the development of successful telehealth applications, particularly in primary care with hard-to-reach clients, the implementation of these technologies has been uneven. Arguably, one of the reasons they have not proliferated in primary care prior to the COVID-19 pandemic relates to the strong tradition of in-person interactions in primary care between provider and patient. This is how health professional students have been taught, what they observe in practice, and-as Hyman (2020) notes-may even be central to their professional identity. Patients have also learned this tradition as they have encountered care throughout their lifespan and may perceive such care as a hallmark of quality primary care. This delivery model has been reinforced by the historical lack of reimbursement by public and private payers for primary care delivered through video or telephone. The COVID-19 pandemic prompted Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) to adjust telehealth reimbursement rules, resulting in a significant increase in video and phone visits in primary care. This allowed many more patients to experience the convenience of web-based care (Betancourt, Rosenberg, Zevalios, Brown, and Mileski, 2020) . Compared to February 2019 through February 2020 when medical claims for health services employing telehealth rose 121% nationally, the rise between March 2019 to March 2020 showed a dramatic 4,347% increase indicating the rapid expansion of telehealth services (Gelburd, 2020) . Today, consumer demand has begun to drive the change as will long-term change in reimbursement from CMS and other payers (Mehrotra, Wang, & Snyder, 2020) .

Every mode of patient care delivery has benefits and limitations or barriers. Telehealth is no different. Table 1 reviews the primary strengths or benefits of telehealth as well as the barriers to effective patient care utilizing telehealth. 2. Patient's exposure to infectious disease is reduced and those who are immunocompromised are protected.

2.Inadequate broadband particularly in rural and remote areas to support access, connectivity and speed. 3. Timely care between patient and providers, provider and specialty consultants and allied members of the health care team. .

3.Access and continuity of care influenced by licensure, payment parity, HIPAA and provider preferences.

Although any form of health care can be fraudulently deployed, telehealth provides ready opportunities for abuse because -unscrupulous providers …have much greater reach with telehealth‖ (Cohen, cited in Schulte, 2020, para 4). This reach includes -sham remote visits to increase the size and scale‖ of their criminal operations, states U.S. Health and Human Services Deputy Inspector General Christi Grimm (cited in Berry, 2021, para 8) resulting in -enormous losses to payers through Medicare fraud‖ (Berry, para 9). And, because Medicare is financed though taxes and premiums paid by Medicare beneficiaries, the balance between opening access to care and preventing financial abuse is complex, particularly given the popular support for telehealth by those who are not aware of the potential for abuse. The problem is not limited to governmental payers such as Medicare, but also includes private payer such as commercial insurance.

Two current policy issues of contention can interact to accelerate fraud and excessive health care costs:1) first dollar coverage of telehealth services, in which patients pay no cost sharing in the form of deductibles or copayments and thus have little incentive to question what is offered to them; and 2) providers being able to bill for telehealth for people they have never seen.

Although both issues can increase access to needed care, they also create dramatic new openings for exploitation of taxpayer dollars through fraudulently billing of Medicare and Medicaid and manipulation of vulnerable, unsuspecting patients who cannot be aware that the services offered are a financial scheme rather than representing valuable services. Moreover, even outside of fraud, telehealth for some services has been found to be associated with more downstream use of health care services than in-person visits, which therefore limits telehealth cost effectiveness (Li, et al, 2021) . This phenomenon suggest that these telehealth services were -additive‖ rather than -substantive,‖ with the latter being a component of a value-oriented, post -pandemic telemedicine regulation and payment orientation suggested by Mehrotra et al (2020) .

Fragmentation of care is also a risk that can be associated with telehealth services.

Single-purpose telehealth providers already offer virtual consultations and prescriptions for a variety of conditions. Patients may or may not disclose these prescriptions to their primary care provider, resulting in potential safety issues. Optimal payment policy that is focused on delivering timely and effective primary care to patients will spur the uptake of telehealth that adds value and prevents downstream costs rather than increasing low value, unnecessary care, with both provider payment and patient cost sharing aligned with this critical aim. Valueinformed nurses can play a key role in deployment of high-quality telehealth services.

Virtual care may offer particular opportunities for effective teamwork and a dramatically reenvisioned professional life. No longer geographically bound, the opportunities to live or relocate as one wishes to create virtual -warm hand-offs‖ between team members and disciplines along with work hours that are acceptable to patients and providers versus being limited by facilities/office hours are appealing. However, the roles and dimensions of team members in primary care must be developed just as they are for in-person teams. Best practices in virtual team building incorporate creating trust, clarifying work roles inclusive of expectations and boundaries, developing strategies for effective delegation and referral, and using appropriate software and technology. At this point, it is unclear if telework will enhance provider satisfaction or create new forms of burnout for primary care providers. Will truncating commuting and other geographic-related efforts enhance provider satisfaction or, instead, will -ZOOM fatigue‖ (Melsenzahl, 2020) overwhelm any positive gains proffered by telework?

The rapid and dramatic expansion of telehealth services in response to the COVID-19 pandemic could not have taken place without a concomitant willingness on the part of public payers, namely Medicaid and Medicare, to remove regulatory barriers at least during this public health emergency period. Given that CMS is particularly charged with caring for the elderly and the low income who were particularly vulnerable during the epidemic, this has great significance for the nation.

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, Medicare allowed for several telehealth services, but they were limited by geography, provider type, and organizations. All of this changed in March 2020, when CMS issued waivers to its requirements; one of the first on March 17 2020 allowed all beneficiaries to receive telehealth services in any location, including their homes. This was followed by a series of temporary waivers to make telehealth more readily accessible.

Medicare reports that prior to the COVID-19 emergency, 13,000 beneficiaries in fee for service

Medicare received a telemedicine service per week; this escalated to 1.7 million a week by the end of April (Verma, 2020 (Fraher et al., 2015; Ghorob and Bodenheimer, 2012; Lamb et al., 2015) . In primary care, early evidence suggests that RNs are effective in supporting chronic condition management, promoting health and wellness, coordinating care for high need, complex patients and managing transitions of care while reducing unnecessary utilization of health services (Bodenheimer & Mason, 2016) .

Practices (LEAP) suggest that a large majority of LEAP primary care practices, regardless of practice type or corporate structure, use RNs as a key part of their care team model (Ladden et al., 2013) . This contrasts with a study of 496 practices in the CMS's Comprehensive Primary

Care initiative (Peikes et al., 2014) that found that only 36 percent of practices had RNs on staff, compared with 77 percent of LEAP sites (Flinter et al., 2017) . If final regulations preclude RNs from billing for telehealth services currently paid for in the in-person environment, it represents a step backward in already limited reimbursement options and a disincentive to employ RNs.

Prior to the COVID-19 crisis, private insurance coverage for telehealth varied from payer to payer and differences between plans. Since then, several health plans announced that they would support telehealth services including no fee or copay for subscribers. Also of note, a Blue Cross and Blue Shield survey found that 75% of Americans with behavioral health conditions are still able to continue therapy due to the availability of telehealth services.

However, 42% of Americans reported delaying routine healthcare (Blue . Unfortunately, the number of people affected by the pandemic still grows, variants emerge, and the need for social distancing continues. Vulnerable people may fear in-person medical visits and may be delaying routine and chronic disease maintenance care. Thus, there is a pressing need to continue the ability to have continued access to telehealth visits.

There is a recognized need for additional primary care capacity. To accommodate this -growing need for primary care providers, educators will have to increase coursework and student clinical experiences in primary care settings, which in turn could lead to more graduates choosing careers in primary care and ambulatory and community-based settings‖ (NASEM, 2021 (b), p. 30 processes to deliver safe nursing care to diverse populations in a variety of settings, and using knowledge of nursing and other professions to address the health care needs of patients and populations ( p.196). On a practical level, students in primary care will need grounding in the technical skills of telehealth as well as a framework to address ethical challenges that may arise within an interdisciplinary team and administration of services. Educational experiences can incorporate interprofessional learning in telehealth. (Rutledge et al, 2017) . COVID-19 gives the opportunity for advanced practice students to work with providers who are actively using telemedicine visits.

Graduate level nurse abilities add to these core competencies to include care redesign;

developing, maintaining and evaluating virtual teams; workflow optimization, and oversight of cost, quality, and value outcomes. For advanced practice registered nurses (APRN) and all licensed independent providers on the primary care team, the core challenge may well be developing the confidence and competence to be able to conduct the full visit, from history to physical exam, assessment, diagnosis(es), and treatment all in the context of virtual care, using new tools such as remotely monitoring devices.

As the COVID-19 crisis loomed, providers who had never used telehealth services were engaged in a steep learning curve in developing competency in telehealth visits. Going forward telehealth needs to be part of the competencies for all practicing RN's and advanced practice nurses. Clinicians should participate in telehealth service continuing education such as prevention education etiquette, how to deliver care via telehealth visits and navigate home monitoring data sharing (i.e. glucose, blood pressure, electrocardiogram) with technological devices. It is also important for clinicians to learn the regulatory aspects of telehealth, how to maintain standards of care, ethics, prevention of fraud, and the economics of telehealth.

Education methods should include didactic content, but also telehealth experiences through simulation with standardized patients (Rutledge et al, 2017) .

The National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) plays an important role in nursing, including administration of initial practice (NCLEX) and other certification examinations, oversight of school curricula, and regulation of nursing practice. In order to ensure that the NCLEX accurately reflects entry level nursing practice, the NCSBN conducts both triennial and continuous practice analyses. These analyses include extensive literature review, input from new graduate nurses, and nurse leader interviews (Williams, Kim, and Dickson, 2014 An important aspect of the temporary Public Health Emergency Waiver was dropping the requirement for the provider to be licensed in the patient's state. Some state requirements still apply, but this opens patient access to specialty providers and eliminates patient problems with transportation over distances to get to providers in other states (Center for Connected Health Policy, 2020).

The digital divide remains a concern. Both providers and patients need to have resources to properly conduct a telehealth visit. However, not everyone has access to required resources.

According to U.S. 2015 census data, 89% of households had some sort of computer and internet (Ryan, 2018 

Privacy concerns exist in all of health care but have additional nuances in telehealth. Basic 

The policy recommendations for the future are based on the evidence to date but will require ongoing monitoring and development of telehealth as it becomes more widespread and embedded into routine primary care. We recommend the following:

1. Payment policy should support provision of primary care services provided by RN's, APRNs and other members of the health care team, particularly those that replace other services, diminish low value and unnecessary care, and support cost-effective, high-quality outcomes.

2. Patient cost sharing should be designed to maximize access to telehealth services that address patient needs and reduce use of expensive downstream care.

3. Primary care services delivered through telehealth should be subject to the same standards,

regulations, and quality expectations as visits as in person visits.

4. Telehealth technology and platform must be subject to the same stringent privacy regulation as in person care.

5. Federal funding is essential to enable widespread broad band expansion with particular attention to rural, low income, and special needs populations.

6. Federal research funding should prioritize the use and effectiveness of telehealth in primary care addressing key national health priorities.

1. Schools of Nursing should invest in telehealth resources for the provision of telehealth clinical learning experiences across the curriculum.

2. Current knowledge and practices in telehealth should be incorporated in nursing curriculum at the pre-licensure and advanced levels of nursing education, inclusive of the ethical obligation to prevent fraud and abuse.

3. Current Clinicians should have ongoing opportunities for learning of the latest telehealth applications for primary care.

4. Evidence-based frameworks for the evaluation of telehealth in nursing and health care practice need to be developed.

Telehealth has arrived, demonstrated acceptance from providers and patients, and now must be integrated into health policy, payment and nursing education to ensure long term viability and improve patient-centered care for all consumers and providers of primary care.

2012credentialing and privileging process for that distantly located institution. 

There is no conflict of interest on the part of any of the authors of this manuscript in relation to influencing their judgment, financial relationships (such as employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony) or identifiable conflicts of interest that might undermine the credibility of the journal, the authors, and of the policy recommendations in the paper.

The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

CMS payment policies & regulatory flexibilities during COVID-19 emergency

Primary care practice finances in the United States amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Study estimates the potential impact of COVID-19 on operating expenses and revenues of primary care practices

Telehealth expansion provides new opportunities for fraud

The impact of COVID-19 on telemedicine utilization across multiple service lines

Media Statement: Blue Cross and Blue Shield Companies announce coverage of telehealth services for Members

75% of Americans with behavioral health conditions are continuing therapy services during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic

Registered nurses: Partners in transforming primary care. In Preparing registered nurses for enhanced roles in primary care

Telehealth coverage policies in the time of COVID-19

Teaching health care professionals about health literacy: A review of the literature

Developing and testing the health literacy universal precautions toolkit

Registered nurses in primary care: Emerging new roles and contributions to team-based care in high-performing practices

Nursing in a transformed health care system

Telecommunications Systems in Support of Disaster Medicine: Applications of Basic Information Pathways

The Coronavirus pandemic and the transformation of telehealth

Share the care™: Building teams in primary care practices

What is telehealth? How is it telehealth different from telemedicine

The disappearance of the primary care physical examination-losing touch

What is telehealth? How is it different from telemedicine?

The emerging primary care workforce: Preliminary observations from the primary care team: Learning from effective ambulatory practices project

Peterson, and Task Force Members. 2015. Policy agenda for nurseled care coordination

Direct-to-consumer telemedicine visits for acute respiratory infections linked to more downstream visits

Telemedicine: What should the postpandemic regulatory and payment landscape look like? Commonwealth Fund

What it feels like to experience ZOOM burnout and how to avoid it

Telemedicine: An emerging health care technology

) (a). 2021. Implementing High-Quality Primary Care: Rebuilding the Foundation of Health Care

b) 2021. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity

Creating a framework to support measure development for telehealth. Department of Health and Human Services under contract

FAQS on telehealth and HIPPA during COVID-19 nationwide public health emergency. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Shame and health literacy: the unspoken connection

Staffing patterns of primary care practices in the comprehensive primary care initiative

Telehealth and eHealth in nurse practitioner training: current perspectives

Computer and internet use in the United States

Coronavirus fuels explosive growth in telehealth -And concern about fraud

2020. Telehealth essentials for advanced practice nursing

Care coordination: Roles of Registered Nurses across the care continuum

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)

US Department of Health and Human Services (a)

COVID-19 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for State Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Agencies Retrieved

Early impact of CMS expansion of Medicare telehealth during COVID-19

Primary care registered nurse telehealth policy implications

Validating the NCLEX-RN test plan: Comparing practice analysis data

Telemedicine: history, applications, and impact on librarianship