key: cord-0943773-rdk0k8ja authors: Alves, Paulo J.; Barreto, Ruben T.; Barrois, Brigitte M.; Gryson, Luc G.; Meaume, Sylvie; Monstrey, Stan J. title: Update on the role of antiseptics in the management of chronic wounds with critical colonisation and/or biofilm date: 2020-12-13 journal: Int Wound J DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13537 sha: f3cee6556135b8591ef9618f040ac5fa6a9bf254 doc_id: 943773 cord_uid: rdk0k8ja Biofilms play a major role in delaying chronic wounds from healing. A wound infiltrated with biofilm, or “critically colonised” wound, may become clinically infected if the number of microbes exceeds a critical level. Chronic wound biofilms represent a significant treatment challenge by demonstrating recalcitrance towards antimicrobial agents. However, a “window of opportunity” may exist after wound debridement when biofilms are more susceptible to topical antiseptics. Here, we discuss the role of antiseptics in the management of chronic wounds and biofilm, focusing on povidone‐iodine (PVP‐I) in comparison with two commonly used antiseptics: polyhexanide (PHMB) and silver. This article is based on the literature reviewed during a focus group meeting on antiseptics in wound care and biofilm management, and on a PubMed search conducted in March 2020. Compared with PHMB and silver, PVP‐I has a broader spectrum of antimicrobial activity, potent antibiofilm efficacy, no acquired bacterial resistance or cross‐resistance, low cytotoxicity, good tolerability, and an ability to promote wound healing. PVP‐I represents a viable therapeutic option in wound care and biofilm management, with the potential to treat biofilm‐infiltrated, critically colonised wounds. We propose a practical algorithm to guide the management of chronic, non‐healing wounds due to critical colonisation or biofilm, using PVP‐I. Wound healing is a complicated and tightly regulated process that is essential to restore the normal barrier function of the skin, thereby preventing further damage or infection. 1, 2 The normal wound healing process involves sequential but overlapping phases, including inflammation, proliferation, and remodelling. 1 These phases are mediated by a range of cell types including fibroblasts, keratinocytes, endothelial cells, and macrophages, the activity of which is carefully coordinated by a range of growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines. 3 However, when a wound fails to progress through the normal successive phases of wound healing in an orderly and timely manner, a chronic wound may result. 1, 4 Chronic wounds, comprising vascular leg ulcers (eg, venous and arterial ulcers), diabetic foot ulcers, and pressure ulcers, represent a significant burden to the individual and to the healthcare system. 5, 6 There are many factors that may be responsible for the delay and/or failure of a chronic wound to heal, including the patient's age, the nutritional status (eg, obesity) of the patient, how oxygenated the wound is, and the presence of either an underlying chronic disease (eg, diabetes) or an immunocompromised condition (eg, cancer). 7, 8 Certain therapies may also hinder wound healing, including chemotherapeutic agents, radiation therapy and long-term use of corticosteroids, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. 9, 10 Perhaps the most important factor that can affect the healing of a chronic wound, and subsequently increase the likelihood the wound may become infected, is the presence of a biofilm. [11] [12] [13] [14] Biofilms are generally polymicrobial communities, attached either to each other or to a surface that become encased within an extracellular polymeric substance (EPS). 11, 15, 16 Most biofilms located within chronic wounds are composed of 10% to 20% microorganisms and 80% to 90% EPS. 11 Biofilms cause chronic wounds to become locked in an inflammatory state, 17, 18 and they are thought to be the root cause of approximately 80% of all infections in humans, 11 and most medical device-related infections. 19 A recent systematic review and meta-analysis has proposed that the prevalence of biofilms in chronic wounds is 78.2%, although a more conservative estimate suggests that the figure may be 60%. 13, 20 Biofilms in chronic wounds are difficult to visualise macroscopically, and whether located on the surface of a wound or deeper in the wound bed, the identification and diagnosis of biofilms in chronic wounds can be challenging. 21 Although tissue biopsies are regarded as one of the most reliable methods to detect biofilms in wounds, the procedure can be invasive, painful, and expensive, and usually requires a specifically trained practitioner to be performed. [22] [23] [24] Furthermore, the distribution of biofilms within chronic wounds is not thought to be uniform, 25 so a single biopsy sample taken from just one small area of a wound may not be enough to confirm the presence of biofilm within the wound as a whole. An algorithm to help identify (and treat) suspected biofilms has been developed, which is intended to guide the clinical management of chronic wounds. 11 In addition, recent consensus guidelines have been proposed to help clinicians recognise the signs and symptoms of biofilms in chronic, non-healing wounds, thereby optimising patient care. 21 Nevertheless, there are currently no "gold standard" diagnostic tests to enable clinicians to confirm the presence of biofilms in chronic wounds. 11, 18, 21, 26 The "wound infection continuum" conceptualises the relationship between bacteria, wound, and host, 12 and a key phase of this continuum is "critical colonisation", which marks the proliferation of microbes within the wound and the development of biofilm. 8 Agreement is yet to be reached on how best to define the term critical colonisation, but Cutting (2003) suggested it refers to a wound that has become compromised by microbes, resulting in delayed healing without causing the classic signs and symptoms traditionally associated with clinical infection. 27 A critically colonised-or more generally biofilm infiltrated-wound has the potential to deteriorate to clinical infection once microbes reach a critical level (10 5 colony-forming units per gram tissue); should the numbers of bacteria increase above this level, the likelihood of infection increases as the host's immune system may no longer be able to control the proliferating microbes. 8, 28 In contrast, an infected wound marks the presence of multiplying microbes, which have already overwhelmed the host's immune system, leading to the traditional clinical signs of inflammation, including redness, swelling, warmth, pain, and potentially fever. [28] [29] [30] Alternative terms do exist in the literature to describe a wound that is critically colonised, including "sub-clinically infected", but at present there appears to be no consensus on how best to describe this stage in the wound infection continuum. 8, 12, 29 White and Cutting (2008) argued that critical • chronic wounds with biofilm, or "critically colonised wounds", are slow to heal and pose a significant burden to the patient and the healthcare system • biofilms in chronic wounds are very often tolerant and resistant to antibiotics and antiseptics, leading to treatment failure • a time-dependent "window of opportunity" is thought to exist after wound debridement during which biofilms are increasingly susceptible to treatment, in particular topical antiseptics • the topical antiseptic PVP-I demonstrates a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity, potent antibiofilm efficacy, no acquired bacterial resistance or cross-resistance, low cytotoxicity, good tolerability, and an ability to promote wound healing, making it a promising therapeutic option in wound care and biofilm management • a new algorithm has been proposed for the management of chronic, non-healing wounds due to critical colonisation and/or biofilm, using PVP-I colonisation is a cause of delayed healing and failure to acknowledge this important clinical step in the wound infection continuum could jeopardise the early diagnosis and treatment of a chronic wound. 29 Therefore, if a biofilm-infiltrated chronic wound can be treated before advancing beyond critical colonisation, this should not only improve the status of the wound but also help to avoid any significant personal and economic burden should the wound subsequently become infected. 29 To date, therapeutic intervention to eradicate biofilms in chronic wounds has relied principally on the use of conventional antibiotics and antiseptics. 16 However, chronic wound biofilms can be highly tolerant and resistant to antibiotics and antiseptics. 21, 31 A wide range of molecular mechanisms are thought to contribute to the recalcitrance of biofilms towards antimicrobial agents, which may subsequently lead to treatment failure. [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] Debridement also represents a viable treatment strategy against biofilms, but it is unable to completely remove all biofilm and so is not recommended for use alone. 21 Biofilms may reform quickly, even after repeated debridement, yet a time-dependent "window of opportunity" is thought to exist after debridement during which biofilms are more susceptible to treatment, in particular topical antiseptics. 21, 31, 36 By delaying biofilm reformation after debridement, topical antiseptics may reduce the risk of infection and subsequent need for antibiotics, helping to minimise the potential for antibiotic resistance to develop. 21 Indeed, recent consensus guidelines recommend topical antiseptics as first-line therapy in the treatment of stalled (chronic) wounds. 21 Here, we review the antibiofilm efficacy, safety, and tolerability of topical antiseptics in chronic wound care and biofilm management, focusing specifically on povidone-iodine (PVP-I) in comparison with two commonly used antiseptics in wound care, polyhexamethylene biguanide/polyhexanide (PHMB), and silver. We also propose a new practical clinical guide or algorithm for the treatment of chronic, non-healing wounds due to critical colonisation or biofilm. This narrative review results from a Focus Group meeting on "antiseptics in wound care and biofilm management" held in December 2019. The review is based primarily on the literature reviewed and recommended by the authors during the meeting. Additional English language publications of relevance were identified following literature searches conducted in PubMed in March 2020, using various combinations of the key terms: "antimicrobial", "biofilm", "critical colonisation", "chronic wound", "cytotoxicity", "non-healing wound", "polyhexamethylene biguanide", "polyhexanide", "polihexanide", "povidone iodine", "silver", "silver colloid", "silver compounds", "silver ion", "silver nanoparticles", "topical antiseptics", "wound dressing", and "wound healing". The key terms in all searches could be combined using Boolean operators such as "OR" or "AND". No date restrictions in the searches were employed. Only full-text articles identified from the searches that were considered directly relevant were included in this review, and most of these articles were open access. Reference lists of identified papers were also hand-searched to identify any further papers of interest. Reports and academic dissertations were not considered for inclusion in this review. Differences observed in the antimicrobial spectrum of activity of PVP-I, PHMB, and silver may stem from the varying mechanisms of action of each antiseptic. An overview of the antimicrobial activity and mechanisms of action of PVP-I, PHMB, and silver is presented in Table 1 . 3.1.1 | Povidone-iodine PVP-I is an iodophor or iodine-releasing agent, consisting of a complex of iodine and a neutral polymer base (polyvinylpyrrolidone), which acts as a reservoir of free active iodine. 37, 44, 67 PVP-I has a particularly broad antimicrobial spectrum of activity that includes Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (including strains resistant to antiseptics and antibiotics), fungi, protozoa, viruses, bacterial spores, and amoeba. [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] Studies suggest that PVP-I exhibits a rapid onset of activity, with antimicrobial efficacy evident after a contact time of 1 minute, although there were certain study limitations to take into consideration. 71 [73] [74] [75] Of significance, a recent in vitro study has shown that PVP-I also provides rapid and potent activity against SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID- 19) pandemic. 76 In the study, all topical and oral PVP-I products tested provided ≥99.99% virucidal activity against SARS-CoV-2 within 30 seconds of contact, suggesting that PVP-I could form a valuable part of future COVID-19 infection control strategies. 76 There have been no reports of bacterial resistance to iodine despite more than 150 years of use, possibly due to the multiple mechanisms of action exhibited by free iodine. 44, 45, 48, 77 In addition, no evidence of cross-resistance to antibiotics or other antiseptics has been observed with PVP-I use in a wide range of Grampositive and Gram-negative bacterial species. 40,46,47 PHMB is a biguanide, a strong base, which is highly positively charged at physiological pH. 51 Findings from in vitro studies have demonstrated efficacy of PHMB on Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria, and Candida albicans, 51 but it is without rapid onset of antimicrobial activity. 72 There have been no reports of bacteria acquiring resistance to PHMB, 51-53 possibly a consequence of its non-specific mechanisms of action. 55 Although recent reviews suggest no evidence of crossresistance to antibiotics in Gram-positive and Gramnegative bacteria after low-level exposure to PHMB, 46, 47 reduced susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) to daptomycin and other cell walltargeting antibiotics has been reported. 54 Silver-containing products used in wound care (eg, silver salts, colloidal silver, and more recently, silver nanoparticles) require the release of positively charged silver ions in order to exhibit antimicrobial activity. 68, 78, 79 The conversion process of inert metal to active ionised form is thought to be facilitated by interaction of the silver contained in wound dressings with aqueous media (eg, wound exudate). 80 The rate of onset of antimicrobial efficacy of certain higher silver release formulations has been demonstrated within 30 minutes of contact with clinically relevant bacteria. 81 Silver has demonstrated bactericidal activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, and may also target fungi and viruses. [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] Bacterial resistance to silver has been documented. [63] [64] [65] [66] Evidence suggests silver resistance is encoded on plasmids. 82 Plasmid-encoded resistance to silver is of particular concern in the clinical setting as plasmid transfer between bacteria within polymicrobialinfected chronic wounds may confer silver resistance across multiple bacterial species. 83 Furthermore, plasmid-mediated metallic salt resistance has been shown to be associated with coresistance to antibiotics. 84 No cross-resistance to antibiotics has been reported to date. 49 T A B L E 1 Antimicrobial activity and mechanisms of action for povidone-iodine, polyhexanide, and silver Characteristic Povidone-iodine Polyhexanide Silver Broad spectrum of activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, fungi, protozoa, viruses, bacterial spores, and amoeba [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] Antimicrobial efficacy on Gramnegative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria, and Candida albicans 51 Bactericidal activity against Gramnegative and Gram-positive bacteria, fungi, and viruses [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] Bacterial resistance No reports of bacterial resistance 44, 45 No reports of bacterial resistance [51] [52] [53] Gram-negative bacteria, including E coli, P aeruginosa, K pneumoniae, and E cloacae, may all express resistance [63] [64] [65] [66] Crossresistance No reports of cross-resistance to antibiotics or other antiseptics 40, 46, 47 Prolonged exposure of MRSA to a low concentration of PHMB in vitro associated with reduced susceptibility, not only to PHMB, but also to daptomycin 54 No cross-resistance reported 49 Mechanism of action Iodine oxidises fatty acids, amino acids, and nucleic acids, leading to destabilisation of cell membranes, deactivation of cytosolic enzymes, and disruption of internal metabolic pathways [48] [49] [50] Disrupts cell membranes, increasing membrane permeability via interaction with acidic, negatively charged membrane phospholipids, and inhibits internal metabolic processes 54, 55 Ionic form reacts with the thiol groups in enzymes and proteins, adversely affecting enzyme function, cell replication, and energy generation in a nonspecific manner 56,67-69 Silver ions also interfere with electron transport and/or membrane ion-exchange systems 69, 70 Abbreviations: MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; PHMB, polyhexanide. 3.2 | Antibiofilm efficacy The World Union of World Healing Societies 2016 Position Document recognises iodine as a suitable antimicrobial agent to manage biofilms, 18 and numerous studies have been conducted to investigate the antibiofilm efficacy of PVP-I. Sub-inhibitory concentrations of PVP-I (0.17%, 0.35%, and 0.7% w/v) inhibited biofilm development by Staphylococcus epidermidis and S aureus, two of the most prevalent bacterial species found within chronic wounds. 17, 85 Using an in vitro model of chronic wound biofilms, Hill et al (2010) demonstrated that mixed Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus biofilms were disrupted by PVP-I 1% (w/v) solution; in contrast, these mixed biofilms were unaffected by treatment with ciprofloxacin and flucloxacillin. 86 Furthermore, in the same study, mature 7-day mixed biofilms were completely destroyed by PVP-I-containing dressing. 86 PVP-I at low doses (0.25% w/w) completely eradicated established biofilms of multi-drug resistant S aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and C albicans in vitro. 87 In a complex biofilm model, PVP-I 10% solution destroyed both early (90 minutes) and mature (48 hours) biofilms formed by Candida auris, an emerging multi-drug resistant yeast. 88, 89 The antibiofilm efficacy of PVP-I is rapid in onset in vitro, with total eradication of mature 3-day biofilms of S aureus and P aeruginosa achieved after only 15 minutes' exposure. 90 Using a basally perfused biofilm model, PVP-I 10% w/v demonstrated greater effectiveness against a biofilm community consisting of P aeruginosa, Streptococcus pyogenes, MRSA, and Bacteriodes fragilis compared with PHMB 0.5% v/v and silver acetate 0.05% w/v. 91 In the study, PVP-I (57%) achieved the largest reduction in average bacterial count over time vs PHMB (44%) and silver acetate (27%). 91 In a further study, iodine-containing wound dressings demonstrated greater antimicrobial efficacy against mature biofilms of P aeruginosa and S aureus over a 24-hour period compared with silver-based dressings using an in vitro static diffusion model. 92 PHMB is the most used antiseptic to treat critically colonised and locally infected acute and chronic wounds. 93 Investigations into the antibiofilm efficacy of PHMB have demonstrated that wound irrigation by PHMB was effective against MRSA 3-and 6-day biofilms in a porcine wound model. 94 Application of a PHMBcontaining biocellulose dressing to non-healing locally infected and/or critically colonised wounds provided good efficacy against existing biofilm in 10 (63%) adult patients, thereby facilitating wound healing. 95 In addition, comparable efficacy of PHMB to chlorhexidine (CHG) was demonstrated against P aeruginosa biofilm grown in routinely used microtitre plates and on silicone materials in vitro in artificial wound fluid. 96 However, although PHMB was equally as effective as saline solution in reducing the bacterial load in venous leg ulcers, neither treatment was able to eliminate biofilm from the wound tissue. 97 Furthermore, conflicting evidence exists regarding the activity of PHMB against S aureus biofilms. 98,99 Silver has been positioned among first-line options for the treatment of wound infections and is recommended for use in biofilm treatment. 12, 18 Silver sulfadiazine 5 to 10 μg/mL eradicated mature P aeruginosa biofilm in vitro, 100 and colloidal silver 100 and 150 μL almost completely eliminated S aureus biofilm in vitro 24 hours after treatment. 101 Application of a silver-containing wound dressing to a 24-hour biofilm composed of either P aeruginosa, Enterobacter cloacae, S aureus, or a mixed bacterial community, resulted in total bacterial killing after 48 hours' exposure. 102 Antibiofilm efficacy of silver ions against S epidermidis is thought to be mediated by the binding of silver ions to proteins and polysaccharides within the EPS, leading to breakdown of the EPS and destabilisation of the overall biofilm structure. 103 Silver nanoparticles are a relatively new addition to the range of available antimicrobial treatment options. 104 Interaction of silver nanoparticles with an aqueous environment (eg, an exuding wound) promotes oxidation of the nanoparticles and subsequent release of antimicrobial silver ions. 104 A concentration-dependent effect on P aeruginosa biofilm development and architecture has been demonstrated, with complete inhibition of biofilm growth achieved with a high concentration (18 μg/mL) of silver nanoparticles. 105 Potent antibiofilm efficacy of silver nanoparticles has been shown against C auris by inhibition of biofilm formation and by the disruption and distortion of pre-formed biofilms. 106 Silver nanoparticles have demonstrated potent inhibition of biofilm formation by Escherichia coli, P aeruginosa, and Serratia proteamaculans. 107 A 7-day treatment in vitro study by Kostenko et al (2010) concluded that the efficacy of silver against biofilms formed by MRSA, P aeruginosa, and E coli was determined by the type of silver species and base materials used in the wound dressings. 108 A pre-requisite of any wound dressing is to shield the wound, offering not only a physical protective barrier but also a first line of defence against antimicrobial invasion of the wound. Intimate contact between the wound dressing and those cells that are key to the wound healing process is inevitable, so it is vital that a wound dressing demonstrates good cell compatibility. 109 Cytotoxic effects of a wound dressing would reduce the viability, proliferation, and migration of cells involved in the wound healing process, and so decrease the healing rate. 109 Studies have shown different levels of cytotoxicity among PVP-I, PHMB, and silver-containing products ( Table 2) . [110] [111] [112] [113] [114] [115] [116] [117] [118] [119] [120] [121] [122] [123] [124] [125] [126] [127] [128] [129] Cytotoxicity data, in particular data derived from in vitro studies, must be interpreted with caution as any cytotoxic effects observed in cultured cell types can be magnified and may not be truly reflective of the in vivo or clinical setting. 49, 130, 131 3.3.1 | Povidone-iodine A cytotoxicity assay conducted in cultured murine fibroblasts showed that PVP-I had the lowest cytotoxicity compared with PHMB, silver nitrate, and silver sulfadiazine. 132 A further in vitro cytotoxicity test using murine fibroblasts demonstrated that PVP-I was less cytotoxic than a variety of antiseptics, including PHMB. 133 Furthermore, of the antiseptics tested, PVP-I was unique in provoking a revitalisation of fibroblasts, which may be pivotal to improved wound healing and better tissue tolerance with PVP-I. 133 In an in vitro study to investigate the cytotoxic effect of commonly used antiseptics on human fibroblasts and mesenchymal stromal cells, PVP-I was the only antiseptic to show remaining cell viability at the minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC; 1.32 g/L); in the same study, PHMB was 100% cytotoxic at the commercially available concentration of 0.04%, which was below the estimated MBC. 130 In vitro T A B L E 2 In vitro cytotoxicity of povidone-iodine, polyhexanide and silver-containing products against cell types instrumental to the wound healing process evidence does exist to suggest that PVP-I may also be cytotoxic towards certain cell types involved in the wound healing process, including fibroblasts, keratinocytes, and endothelial cells. 110, 111, 124 However, commented that PVP-I is well tolerated in human studies when used in appropriate concentrations, and that pronounced cytotoxicity with PVP-I has only been observed in certain in vitro studies. 134 Indeed, the densities of dendrocytes and microvessels in chronic leg ulcers were higher following 6 weeks of PVP-I treatment compared with silver sulfadiazine and CHG, with no evidence of dendrocytoclasis, which may be considered a sign of in vivo cytotoxicity. 135 In contrast, silver sulfadiazine and CHG promoted changes in the superficial microvasculature and induced dendrocytoclasis. 135 Overall, PVP-I has a good tolerability profile. 49 The prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis caused by PVP-I has been estimated to be approximately 0.4%, with reports of anaphylaxis exceptionally rare. 136 There are reports to suggest that PHMB is cytotoxic towards cells that are crucial to the wound healing process. A range of concentrations of PHMB (0.005%-1.0% v/v) demonstrated high cytotoxicity against cultured human keratinocytes and murine fibroblasts after 24 and 72 hours of incubation in vitro. 114 In an in vitro cytotoxicity test using cultured human skin fibroblasts, PHMB was extremely cytotoxic and appeared to induce complete cell destruction in the majority of cells. 112 When used in vitro at or below concentrations commonly employed in human wound care, PHMB (0.01%, 0.04%, and 0.1%) demonstrated both time-and concentration-dependent cytotoxicity in cultured human keratinocytes and osteoblasts, but only time-dependent cytotoxicity in cultured fibroblasts. 113 Furthermore, exposure of cultured human endothelial cells to PHMB (0.0006%-0.01%) resulted in a large reduction in cell number and viability. 125 The overall tolerability profile of PHMB is good, with report of contact dermatitis found to be rare. 136 However, a recent case report identified PHMB as an emerging allergen, which may have induced an anaphylactic reaction. 137 Studies have indicated cytotoxic effects of silver-based dressings and silver nitrate in both cultured fibroblasts and keratinocytes, 115 with silver-based dressings also shown to cause a significant delay in reepithelialisation. 116 In addition, silver-based dressings have been shown to significantly alter the cell morphology and decrease cell proliferation and collagen synthesis of cultured human diabetic fibroblasts in vitro compared with silver-free dressings, suggesting the use of such dressings should be closely monitored when treating diabetic wounds. 118 Although the cytotoxic effects of silver nanoparticles are thought to be dependent on a number of factors, including nanoparticle size, shape, concentration, and aggregation, it remains to be determined if the cytotoxicity is due to inherent properties of the nanoparticles themselves or due to the release of ionic silver following oxidation. [138] [139] [140] Indeed, ionic silver has been found to be significantly more cytotoxic in vitro in human dermal fibroblasts and epidermal keratinocytes compared with silver nanoparticles. 117 Additional in vitro studies provide further evidence of the cytotoxicity of silver-based products on fibroblasts, keratinocytes, and endothelial cells. [119] [120] [121] [122] [123] [126] [127] [128] [129] Nevertheless, silver has a good tolerability profile, and although argyria can result from the long-term use of silver-based products, any discolouration of the skin is not thought to result in pathological tissue damage or to be in any way a danger to life. 141 In wound management, it is important to not only consider the antimicrobial efficacy and potential cytotoxicity of antiseptics, but also to be aware of the way in which antiseptics may impact the complex cellular and extracellular mechanisms involved in the wound healing process. 142 One of the many properties an ideal antiseptic should possess is its ability to facilitate wound healing. 49 PVP-I enhanced wound healing via increased expression of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), neovascularisation, and re-epithelialisation in a rat acute skin wound model. 143 In vitro evidence suggests that PVP-I may facilitate wound healing by exerting an antiinflammatory effect, scavenging superoxide anions, and inhibiting the production of reactive oxygen species by human polymorphonuclear neutrophils. 144 Indeed, treatment of venous leg ulcers with PVP-I in combination with hydrocolloid dressing reduced bacteria-related inflammation, vasculitis, and phagocytic infiltration of the ulcers compared with hydrocolloid dressing alone, resulting in an improved ulcer healing rate. 145 In a further study, the healing rate of chronic leg ulcers was significantly increased by PVP-I vs controls, reducing the time to healing by 2 to 9 weeks. 135 Recently, a phase IV prospective study conducted in 106 adult patients showed that PVP-I foam dressing achieved a shorter epithelialisation time compared with hydrocellular foam dressing and conventional petrolatum gauze when used as a split-thickness skin graft donor site dressing. 146 Further evidence supports the role of PVP-I in wound healing when investigated within in vivo human studies. 147, 148 Compared with silver-based foam dressings or control gauze, PVP-I 3% foam dressing was the most effective dressing in wound healing by promoting neovascularisation, re-epithelialisation, and collagen deposition in an in vivo rat wound model. 149 Similarly, PVP-I 10% solution promoted rapid neovascularisation more effectively than silver nitrate solution in an in vivo mouse wound model. 150 Evidence to date suggests that PHMB may also be beneficial for wound healing. In a recent systematic review, it was concluded that PHMB may promote the healing of chronic wounds, reduce the bacterial load, eradicate MRSA, and lessen wound-related pain. 151 A preclinical study using a mouse wound model demonstrated that PHMB had more beneficial effects on the microcirculation, angiogenesis, and epithelialisation compared with chitosan. 152 In a further study, PHMB had a more positive effect upon the blood flow of intact human skin in vivo than octenidine, suggesting value in the treatment of critically perfused wounds, such as burns. 142 Comparison of a PHMB-containing dressing with a silver-based dressing in patients with critically colonised and locally infected wounds demonstrated that the PHMBcontaining dressing was significantly faster and more effective at removing the critical bacterial load over a 28-day period. 153 In addition, PHMB has been shown to protect keratinocytes from bacterial damage by S aureus and re-establish normal cell proliferation in vitro in a dose-dependent manner. 154 Nevertheless, a recent in vitro study has suggested that PHMB may exert proinflammatory effects, including increased cytokine secretion and nuclear factor kappa B activation, 155 both of which would hinder the wound healing process. A Cochrane meta-analysis concluded that there is insufficient evidence to confirm whether silver-containing products can promote wound healing. 156 Furthermore, the heterogeneous nature of the evidence regarding the effectiveness of silver-based treatments in wound care is thought to have hindered the development of treatment guidelines. 157, 158 As such, authors of a recent qualitative literature analysis proposed that silver-containing wound dressings should be chosen with care if the wound healing process is not to be impeded. 157 Nevertheless, there is evidence to suggest that silver can have beneficial effects on the healing of chronic wounds, including those wounds showing signs of critical colonisation. 159, 160 For example, Duan et al demonstrated that a sub-cytotoxic concentration of silver ions may promote the proliferation of human skin keratinocytes in vitro. 161 Additionally, silver nanoparticles decreased the generation of proinflammatory cytokines by human keratinocytes and fibroblasts in an in vitro wound healing model. 162 3.5 | Algorithm for the treatment of chronic, non-healing wounds due to critical colonisation or biofilm Of the three antiseptics discussed in this review, PVP-I has particular characteristics that are ideal for the treatment of chronic, non-healing wounds due to critical colonisation and/or biofilm, namely its potent antibiofilm efficacy, broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity, wound healing properties, and rapidity of action. Therefore, we have proposed a new practical clinical guide or algorithm to remove biofilm and manage critically colonised wounds, using PVP-I ( Figure 1 ). When biofilm presence within a chronic wound is strongly suspected, clinicians should adopt an early intervention plan to remove the biofilm as soon as possible and reduce the risk of infection. 21, 23 Wound bed preparation is vital if successful wound healing is to occur, as described in the TIMERS (Tissue, Inflammation/infection, Moisture imbalance, Epithelial edge advancement, Repair/regeneration, and Social factors) framework to guide wound care ( Figure 2 ). 23, 163 According to the new algorithm proposed here, intensive mechanical washing or cleansing of the wound with either soap or PVP-I scrub should help to prepare the wound bed by removing debris and biofilm from the wound. This should preferably be performed without causing any additional trauma to the wound. 26 Ideally, cleansing of the wound should be performed with each change in dressing. 12 This is particularly the case if the likelihood of biofilm is high, but the unique characteristics of each particular wound bed should determine the frequency of dressing changes. Following wound cleansing, debridement of the wound can help to disrupt any remaining biofilm, remove necrotic tissue, and stimulate wound healing. 12, 30, 163 Debridement may be achieved using a number of different methods, F I G U R E 1 A proposed new algorithm for the treatment of chronic, non-healing wounds due to critical colonisation and/or biofilm. *Secondary dressing is to be used to keep the primary dressing securely in place including surgical, mechanical, and chemical techniques. 12 The wound can then be disinfected using gauze impregnated with PVP-I dermic solution. Given the rapid onset of action of PVP-I, employing a contact time of at least 1 minute may be sufficient to eradicate the majority of any microbes remaining in the wound. 71, 72 Biofilm is not completely removed by debridement and it may quickly regrow within 24 hours, so debridement alone is not an appropriate treatment strategy. 21, 36 Regrowth of biofilm must be controlled according to the status of the wound, in particular the amount of exudate the wound is producing. A balanced, moist wound 23 NPWT, negative pressure wound therapy environment is seen as critical for wound healing. 23 Not enough exudate or excessive production of exudate will hinder the wound healing process. 23 Dry wounds are devoid of exudate, which hinders the activity of tissuerepairing cells (Figure 3 ). 163 With low and moderate exuding wounds, the wound bed and surrounding skin become increasingly wet. The excessive amount of exudate produced by a highly exuding wound may result in maceration of the surrounding skin. 30 Therefore, it is important to manage moisture levels by selecting the correct dressing. 23 Numerous types of dressing are available to both protect the wound and promote healing ( Table 3) . 1, 164 Choosing the most appropriate option from the extensive range of dressings available can be a difficult treatment decision, but it should ultimately be tailored to the characteristics of each wound and to the patient. 23, 30 Dressings that manage the exudate and encourage a balanced wound environment are crucial for improved patient outcomes. 165 The new algorithm proposes that low to moderate exuding wounds can be treated with PVP-I gel and PVP-I tulle and covered with a secondary dressing. Highly exuding wounds may be treated with PVP-I gel applied beneath an absorbent dressing. Until signs of improvement in the wound bed surface are evident, dressings should be changed daily and regularly checked for discolouration, as any change in colour can indicate reapplication of PVP-I is needed in order to maintain its clinical efficacy. 166 Regular monitoring of the healing status of the wound is required according to specific criteria, including assessment of the size and depth of the wound, and the amount and type of exudate. 30 If there is an improvement in wound healing, F I G U R E 3 Different types of exuding wound. Images were kindly provided by the authors P.J.A. and S.M., with permission treatment may revert to the standard of care (Figure 2 ). 23 Reassessment of the wound should be made on a weekly basis and, if necessary, the procedure outlined in the algorithm can be restarted. Recent evidence suggests that the majority of chronic wounds have biofilms which can hinder wound healing and result in ineffective treatment, burdening both the patient and the healthcare system. PVP-I demonstrates potent efficacy against biofilms formed by a variety of microbes found to be prevalent within chronic wounds, including S aureus, S epidermidis, and P aeruginosa. Given how diverse the microbial community can be within chronic wounds, the broader spectrum of antimicrobial activity of PVP-I should be advantageous vs the more limited spectrum of antimicrobial activity shown by PHMB and silver-containing products. PVP-I also fulfils all of the other requirements of an ideal antiseptic for chronic wound care, including a lack of acquired bacterial resistance or cross-resistance, wound healing properties, low cytotoxicity, and good tolerability. Collectively, these characteristics of PVP-I suggest that it represents a highly viable therapeutic option in wound care and biofilm management, with the potential to be particularly effective during the critically colonised, biofilminfiltrated stage of the wound infection continuum. The proposed new algorithm utilising PVP-I should help to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with chronic, non-healing wounds, which prove particularly unresponsive to treatment. CONFLICT OF INTEREST P.J.A. has served as a consultant for Viatris. R.T.B. has served as a consultant for Viatris. B.M.B. has served as a consultant for Viatris. L.G.G. has served as a consultant for Viatris. S.M. has no conflicts of interest. S.J.M. has received honoraria as a speaker and has been a member of advisory boards for Viatris. All authors contributed to developing the algorithm, analysis and interpretation of information presented, drafting and revising the article, gave final approval of the version to be published, and agree to be held accountable for all aspects of the work. Data sharing is not applicable to this article ORCID Paulo J. Alves https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6348-3316 Chronic wound healing: a review of current management and treatments Skin wound healing: an update on the current knowledge and concepts Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing Challenges in the treatment of chronic wounds Clinical challenges of chronic wounds: searching for an optimal animal model to recapitulate their complexity The humanistic and economic burden of chronic wounds: a systematic review Factors affecting wound healing Importance of biofilm formation in surgical infection Pharmacologic impact (aka "breaking bad") of medications on wound healing and wound development: a literature-based overview Impaired wound healing after radiation therapy: a systematic review of pathogenesis and treatment Biofilms and wounds: an identification algorithm and potential treatment options International Wound Infection Institute. Wound infection in clinical practice The prevalence of biofilms in chronic wounds: a systematic review and metaanalysis of published data Chronic wound biofilm model Analysis of the chronic wound microbiota of 2,963 patients by 16S rDNA pyrosequencing Recent advances in non-conventional antimicrobial approaches for chronic wound biofilms: have we found the 'Chink in the armor'? Biomedicine Biofilms: do they affect wound healing? World Union of Wound Healing Societies. Florence congress, position document. Management of biofilm. Wounds International Bacterial biofilm formation on implantable devices and approaches to its treatment and prevention. Heliyon Biofilms in chronic wounds Consensus guidelines for the identification and treatment of biofilms in chronic nonhealing wounds Comparison of chronic wound culture techniques: swab versus curetted tissue for microbial recovery Implementing TIMERS: the race against hard-to-heal wounds ESCMID guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections Nonrandom distribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in chronic wounds Ten top tips: identification of wound infection in a chronic wound Wound healing, bacteria and topical therapies A proactive approach to wound infection Critical colonisation of chronic wounds: microbial mechanisms Management of chronic wounds: diagnosis, preparation, treatment, and follow-up Microbial biofilms and chronic wounds Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms Molecular mechanisms of biofilm-based antibiotic resistance and tolerance in pathogenic bacteria Biofilm-related infections: bridging the gap between clinical management and fundamental aspects of recalcitrance toward antibiotics Antimicrobial tolerance and the significance of persister cells in recalcitrant chronic wound biofilms Biofilm maturity studies indicate sharp debridement opens a time-dependent therapeutic window Antiseptics in the era of bacterial resistance: a focus on povidone iodine Inactivation of human viruses by povidone-iodine in comparison with other antiseptics Virucidal activity and cytotoxicity of the liposomal formulation of povidone-iodine Investigation on the efficacy of povidone-iodine against antiseptic-resistant species Povidone-iodine in antisepsis-state of the art Action of povidone-iodine against methicillin-sensitive and -resistant cultures of Staphylococcus aureus In vitro effectiveness of povidone-iodine on Acanthamoeba isolates from human cornea Povidone-iodine: use in hand disinfection, skin preparation and antiseptic irrigation Iodine revisited Biocidal agents used for disinfection can enhance antibiotic resistance in gram-negative species Antibiotic resistanceCan be enhanced in grampositive species by some biocidal agents used for disinfection Infectious disease management and control with povidone iodine Povidone iodine in wound healing: a review of current concepts and practices Practical use of povidone-iodine antiseptic in the maintenance of oral health and in the prevention and treatment of common oropharyngeal infections Polyhexanide -safety and efficacy as an antiseptic Using PHMB antimicrobial to prevent wound infection PHMB: a well-tolerated antiseptic with no reported toxic effects Impact of exposure of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to polyhexanide in vitro and in vivo Review on the efficacy, safety and clinical applications of polihexanide, a modern wound antiseptic Antibacterial activity and mechanism of action of the silver ion in Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli Antibacterial activity of colloidal silver against gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria Silver nanoparticles present high intracellular and extracellular killing against Staphylococcus aureus Antibacterial activity and mechanism of silver nanoparticles against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Silver nanoparticles inhibit hepatitis B virus replication Antifungal activity of silver nanoparticles obtained by green synthesis Inhibitory effects of silver nanoparticles on H1N1 influenza a virus in vitro Silver resistance in Gram-negative bacteria: a dissection of endogenous and exogenous mechanisms Unprecedented silver resistance in clinically isolated Enterobacteriaceae: major implications for burn and wound management Bacterial resistance to silver nanoparticles and how to overcome it Effects of silver-based wound dressings on the bacterial flora in chronic leg ulcers and its susceptibility in vitro to silver Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance Consensus on wound antisepsis: update Bacterial silver resistance gained by cooperative interspecies redox behavior Conjugation of penicillin-G with silver(I) ions expands its antimicrobial activity against Gram negative bacteria A comparison of 5-minute povidone-iodine scrub and 1-minute povidoneiodine scrub followed by alcohol foam Standardized comparison of antiseptic efficacy of triclosan, PVPiodine, octenidine dihydrochloride, polyhexanide and chlorhexidine digluconate Povidone-iodine hand wash and hand rub products demonstrated excellent in vitro virucidal efficacy against Ebola virus and modified vaccinia virus Ankara, the new European test virus for enveloped viruses Rapid and effective virucidal activity of povidone-iodine products against Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) In vitro bactericidal and virucidal efficacy of povidone-iodine gargle/mouthwash against respiratory and oral tract pathogens Povidoneiodine demonstrates rapid in-vitro virucidal activity against SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing COVID-19 disease Iodine made easy Dual role of iodine, silver, chlorhexidine and octenidine as antimicrobial and antiprotease agents Antiseptics for treating infected wounds: efficacy on biofilms and effect of pH Silver and its application as an antimicrobial agent Comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of ACTICOAT antimicrobial barrier dressing Isolation of silver-and antibiotic-resistant Enterobacter cloacae from teeth The increasing threat of silver-resistance in clinical isolates from wounds and burns Salmonella typhimurium resistant to silver nitrate, chloramphenicol, and ampicillin Anti-biofilm activity of sub-inhibitory povidone-iodine concentrations against Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus An in vitro model of chronic wound biofilms to test wound dressings and assess antimicrobial susceptibilities Efficacy of dilute povidone-iodine against multi-drug resistant bacterial biofilms, fungal biofilms and fungal spores The comparative efficacy of antiseptics against Candida auris biofilms Candida auris: the recent emergence of a multidrug-resistant fungal pathogen Evaluation of short exposure times of antimicrobial wound solutions against microbial biofilms: from in vitro to in vivo Modelling antisepsis using defined populations of facultative and anaerobic wound pathogens grown in a basally perfused biofilm model In vitro comparison of antimicrobial activity of iodine and silver dressings against biofilms A practice-oriented recommendation for treatment of critically colonised and locally infected wounds using polihexanide Effectiveness of a polyhexanide irrigation solution on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in a porcine wound model A cohort study on the efficacy of a polyhexanide-containing biocellulose dressing in the treatment of biofilms in wounds Efficacy of chlorhexidine, polihexanide and tissue-tolerable plasma against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms grown on polystyrene and silicone materials Effect of polyhexamethylene biguanide solution on bacterial load and biofilm in venous leg ulcers: a randomized controlled trial Bactericidal and antibiofilm effects of polyhexamethylene biguanide in models of intracellular and biofilm of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis Susceptibility of biofilm Escherichia coli, Salmonella Enteritidis and Staphylococcus aureus to detergents and sanitizers Silver against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms Colloidal silver: a novel treatment for Staphylococcus aureus biofilms? Assessing the effect of an antimicrobial wound dressing on biofilms Role of silver ions in destabilization of intermolecular adhesion forces measured by atomic force microscopy in Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms Silver nanoparticles: synthesis and application for nanomedicine Silver nanoparticles exert concentration-dependent influences on biofilm development and architecture Inhibition of Candida auris biofilm formation on medical and environmental surfaces by silver nanoparticles Antibacterial effects of silver nanoparticles on gram-negative bacteria: influence on the growth and biofilms formation, mechanisms of action Impact of silver-containing wound dressings on bacterial biofilm viability and susceptibility to antibiotics during prolonged treatment Effect of nonadhering dressings on promotion of fibroblast proliferation and wound healing in vitro Povidone-iodine solutions inhibit cell migration and survival of osteoblasts, fibroblasts, and myoblasts. Spine (Phila Pa Evaluation of toxic side effects of clinically used skin antiseptics in vitro Comparing size particle, release study and cytotoxicity activity of PHMB encapsulated in different liposomal formulations: neutral and cationic liposomes In vitro activity of Manuka Honey and polyhexamethylene biguanide on filamentous fungi and toxicity to human cell lines Comparing two polymeric biguanides: chemical distinction, antiseptic efficacy and cytotoxicity of polyaminopropyl biguanide and polyhexamethylene biguanide In vitro cytotoxity of silver: implication for clinical wound care A comparative study of the cytotoxicity of silver-based dressings in monolayer cell, tissue explant, and animal models Effects of silver nanoparticles on human dermal fibroblasts and epidermal keratinocytes Cytotoxicity of silver dressings on diabetic fibroblasts Study of cytotoxicity mechanisms of silver nitrate in human dermal fibroblasts Silver nitrate: antimicrobial activity related to cytotoxicity in cultured human fibroblasts In vitro cytotoxicity of silver nanoparticles on human periodontal fibroblasts In vitro cytotoxicity testing of a nanocrystalline silver dressing (Acticoat) on cultured keratinocytes Effect of silver nanoparticles on human primary keratinocytes Corneal endothelial cytotoxicity of diluted povidone-iodine Effect of polyhexanide and gentamycin on human osteoblasts and endothelial cells The effect of biogenic manufactured silver nanoparticles on human endothelial cells and zebrafish model Intravenous administration of silver nanoparticles causes organ toxicity through intracellular ROS-related loss of inter-endothelial junction Effects of different doses of nano silver on vascular endothelial cell proliferation in vitro Silver nanoparticles interact with the cell membrane and increase endothelial permeability by promoting VE-cadherin internalization Selection of an optimal antiseptic solution for intraoperative irrigation: an in vitro study Topical antimicrobial therapy of chronic wounds healing by secondary intention using iodine products Biocompatibility index of antiseptic agents by parallel assessment of antimicrobial activity and cellular cytotoxicity Comparative study of in vitro cytotoxicity of povidone-iodine in solution, in ointment or in a liposomal formulation (Repithel) and selected antiseptics An Asian perspective on povidone iodine in wound healing The beneficial toxicity paradox of antimicrobials in leg ulcer healing impaired by a polymicrobial flora: a proof-of-concept study A comparison of the irritant and allergenic properties of antiseptics A case of severe anaphylaxis to polyhexanide: cross-reactivity between biguanide antiseptics A systematic review on silver nanoparticles-induced cytotoxicity: physicochemical properties and perspectives Negligible particle-specific antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles Toxicity of silver nanoparticles -nanoparticle or silver ion? A pharmacological and toxicological profile of silver as an antimicrobial agent in medical devices The effect of Polyhexanide, Octenidine Dihydrochloride, and tea tree oil as topical antiseptic agents on in vivo microcirculation of the human skin: a noninvasive quantitative analysis Transforming growth factor beta plays an important role in enhancing wound healing by topical application of povidone-iodine Anti-inflammatory properties of a liposomal hydrogel with povidone-iodine (Repithel) for wound healing in vitro Healing rate and bacterial necrotizing vasculitis in venous leg ulcers Comparison of the efficacy and safety of povidone-iodine foam dressing (Betafoam), hydrocellular foam dressing (Allevyn), and petrolatum gauze for split-thickness skin graft donor site dressing An appraisal of povidone-iodine and wound healing Cytotoxicity and sensitization of povidone-iodine and other frequently used anti-infective agents Evaluation of a polyurethane foam dressing impregnated with 3% povidone-iodine (Betafoam) in a rat wound model Comparison of the effects of commonly used wound agents on epithelialization and neovascularization The effectiveness of topical polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB) agents for the treatment of chronic wounds: a systematic review Evaluation of angiogenesis, epithelialisation and microcirculation after application of polyhexanide, chitosan and sodium chloride in rodents Comparison of PHMB-containing dressing and silver dressings in patients with critically colonised or locally infected wounds HaCaT keratinocytes in co-culture with Staphylococcus aureus can be protected from bacterial damage by polihexanide In vitro inflammatory effects of polyhexamethylene biguanide through NF-kappaB activation in A549 cells Topical silver for preventing wound infection Silver in wound care-friend or foe?: a comprehensive review A scoping review of the use of silver-impregnated dressings for the treatment of chronic wounds The effectiveness of silver-releasing dressings in the management of nonhealing chronic wounds: a meta-analysis A randomized controlled trial to evaluate an antimicrobial dressing with silver alginate powder for the management of chronic wounds exhibiting signs of critical colonization Sub-cytotoxic concentrations of ionic silver promote the proliferation of human keratinocytes by inducing the production of reactive oxygen species Effects of silver nanoparticles on primary cell cultures of fibroblasts and keratinocytes in a wound-healing model Wound bed preparation: TIME for an update Selection of appropriate wound dressing for various wounds Importance of moisture balance at the wound-dressing interface Povidone-iodine: an adjunct in the treatmen of wound infections, dehiscences, and fistulas in head and neck surgery Update on the role of antiseptics in the management of chronic wounds with critical colonisation and/or biofilm ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Medical writing assistance in the preparation of this manuscript was provided by Chris Cammack (CircleScience, an Ashfield Company, part of UDG Healthcare plc) and funded by Meda Pharma S.p.A., a Viatris company. All authors were speakers at the Focus Group meeting, funded by Viatris.