key: cord-0942830-hrztp0ey
authors: Curigliano, Giuseppe; Eggermont, Alexander M.M.
title: Adherence to COVID-19 vaccines in cancer patients: promote it and make it happen!
date: 2021-05-24
journal: Eur J Cancer
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.05.007
sha: 136f58d244876bb970090b5feb764a2f01a8c3e4
doc_id: 942830
cord_uid: hrztp0ey

nan

Patients with active cancer may have a higher risk of severe complications to COVID-19 due to their disease, to cancer treatment, age and comorbidities [1] . They have been excluded from the pivotal clinical trials for COVID19 vaccines despite included in the priority category for COVID19 vulnerability [1] . Few data are available on efficacy and safety profiles of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with cancer, resulting in imprecise predictive health models [2, 3] . Recently the first analysis has been reported on the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in the context of a prospective study enrolling patients and health care workers who received the RNAbased SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine 'BNT162b2', with and without the second booster dose at 3 weeks [4] . At 3 weeks, 97% of health care workers had an immune response (anti-S IgG positive titers) with a single inoculum. On the other hand, only 39% of patients with solid tumours and 13% with haematological malignancies had experienced seroconversion with a single inoculum. Patients with poor seroconversion after a single inoculum were those with thoracic malignancies or receiving chemotherapy <15 days from the vaccine. Virus neutralisation assays reported inferior efficacy in cancer patients with a trend of waning for the T-cell response [4] . With the second dose, 95% of (solid) cancer patients resulted seroconverted [4] . Some modelling exercises justified the decision to postpone the second dose in nonvulnerable populations, due to the high seroconversion rate after the first dose and the persistence of the immune protection at the time of the second dose [5] . The preliminary data of the UK prospective trial and other reports comparing cancer patients and health care workers clearly demonstrated that in patients with cancer, immunogenicity increased significantly in patients with solid cancer within 2 weeks of a vaccine boost at day 21 after the first dose [4, 6] . We support prioritisation of patients with cancer for extensive SARS-CoV-2 vaccine coverage. In the current issue of Eur J Cancer Di Noia V. and colleagues report on adherence to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine campaign in the context of a large Italian Comprehensive Cancer Center [7] . According to the National Italian Cancer Vaccination Strategy, cancer patients were considered eligible for vaccination if they were on systemic antitumor treatment, or if received it in the last 6 months, or having an active advanced disease. The BNT162b2 vaccine was proposed to all candidates by phone contact or during a scheduled visit. Adherence to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and reasons of refusal were collected administrating a 6-item multiple-choice questionnaire. In the current study, out of 914 patients eligible for the vaccine, 102 refused vaccination (11.2%, 95% CI 9.1e13.2). The most frequent (>10%) reasons reported were concerns about vaccine-related adverse events (48.1%), negative interaction with concurrent antitumor therapy (26.7%) and the fear of allergic reaction (10.7%). The refusal rate after 15th March [date when the Italian regulatory agency AIFA (Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco) suspended the use of AstraZeneca-AZD1222 for additional safety monitoring] was more than doubled compared to the refusal rate observed before (19.7% versus 8.6%, OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.69e3.99, p < 0.0001) [7] . Many countries around the world developed national vaccination strategies. DOI According to the Italian National Vaccination Plan, health care workers, the elderly population and vulnerable patients (including cancer patients) have been prioritised. A review on the progress of national COVID-19 vaccination strategies in European Union countries includes updates on vaccine uptake overall and by target group; current vaccination phases and priority groups, including adjustments made to priority groups during the rollout; vaccination strategies and policies; and systems to monitor vaccinations and the use of vaccination certificate [8] . [8] . Since the start of COVID-19 vaccine deployment in the EU/ EEA in December 2020, the cumulative vaccine uptake in the adult population (aged 18 years and older) in the EU/ EEA has progressed, reaching 30% for at least one vaccine dose (range: 10.6e50.5%) and 11.6% for the full vaccination course (range: 2.5e25.8%). In people aged 80 years and above, the median vaccine uptake was 78% (range: 10.1e100%) for at least one dose and 56.1% (range: 2.4e97.8%) for the full vaccination course (24 countries reporting). Seven countries have administered the full vaccination course to more than 80% of the population aged 80 years and above [8] . In health care workers (HCW), the median vaccine uptake was 80.2% (range: 20.4e100%) for at least one dose and 53.7% (range: 17.2e100%) for the full vaccination course [8] . European Union countries have primarily prioritised elderly people (with various lower age cutoffs across countries), residents and personnel of long-term care facilities, health care workers, social care personnel and people with certain comorbidities (including cancer patients). Countries are currently continuing vaccination of these groups and progressing to vaccination of younger age groups and essential workers critical to societal infrastructure. The experience reported in this issue of the European Journal of Cancer by Dr Di Noia and colleagues represents the first worldwide report on the adherence of cancer patients to COVID-19 vaccination and underlines how regulatory decisions and media news spreading could influence the success of the COVID-19 vaccine campaign. Several studies evaluated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine adherence [9, 13] . All studies involved health care workers. Factors associated with low vaccine uptake include younger age [10] , female sex [11] and black populations [12, 13] . Higher rates of acceptance were associated with higher income and education levels in one setting [13] . In the current Italian report, the only factor affecting lower adherence was advanced performance status [7] . We have no information on the level of education or income of patients. Interestingly, the vaccine uptake in cancer patients had a dramatic reduction following the decision of the national regulatory agency to suspend the use of AZD1222-vaccine for safety reasons. The 'infodemic' spread increased vaccine hesitancy and resistance. A recent study looked to identify and understand COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, hesitancy and resistance in the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom [14] . Researchers found vaccine-hesitant or resistant respondents in both populations to show lower levels of trust in scientists/health care practitioners. Additionally, vaccine-resistant individuals were found to be less likely to obtain information regarding the pandemic from traditional and authoritative sources such as newspapers and television broadcasts; show higher levels of mistrust in the information disseminated through those sources, health care practitioners and government agencies; and consume more information from social media [14] . This observation highlights the need to both ensure the accuracy of the information disseminated through less conventional media and to regain the trust of experts in a segment of the population. A call for action and an effective health marketing tailored to reach across borders diverse populations should be incorporated into national vaccination strategies. Negative attitudes towards vaccines can be a major public health concern. General mistrust in vaccines and concerns about potential side effects can represent barriers to increase cancer patients population uptake to COVID-19 vaccines. Public health messaging should be tailored to address these concerns and specifically to women, ethnic minorities and people with lower levels of education and incomes. As health care workers, we need to engage the cancer patients community to increase vaccination awareness and acceptance by including and training volunteers in the vaccination effort, using social media and media campaigns to raise awareness, monitoring and reducing the risk of misinformation. On the other hand, national public health strategies should focus on communication by delivering education to motivate cancer patients, providing easily accessible assistance and treating all cancer patients uniquely. We need to approach each patient with a clean slate. We also need to work together; efforts to improve treatment adherence and compliance are most successful when all stakeholders are involved and work together. This can include patients and their family members, primary care physicians, specialists, nurses, pharmacists, therapists and psychologists. The title of this editorial: 'Adherence to SARS-CoCOVID19 Vaccines in Cancer Patients, Promote It and Make It Happen' indicates that without concerted action initiated by the medical community, it will not happen. Communication between various stakeholders, including media outlets and government agencies, must be orchestrated in a way that it will happen, that it will be monitored and that we can report on better adherence numbers as a result of a successful campaign in the future [15] .

None.

GC has received honoraria from Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, Roche; fees for expert testimony and medical education from Pfizer; and has participated in advisory boards for Pfizer, Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Seattle Genetics, Celltrion. All the declarations are outside the submitted work. AMME has received over the last 3 years honoraria for Scientific Advisory Board and/or Independent Data Monitoring Committee membership from Biocad, BioInvent, BioNTech, BMS, CatalYm, Ellipses, Forbion, GSK, IO Biotech, ISA Pharmaceuticals, Merck/MSD, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sellas, SkylineDx. All the declarations are outside the submitted work.

COVID-19 and cancer: 1 year on

SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and cancer patients

On the reliability of predictions on Covid-19 dynamics: a systematic and critical review of modelling techniques

Safety and immunogenicity of one versus two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2 for patients with cancer: interim analysis of a prospective observational study

Seroconversion in patients with cancer and oncology health care workers infected by SARS-CoV-2

Epidemiological and evolutionary considerations of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dosing regimes

The first report on Covid-19 vaccine refusal by cancer patients in Italy: early data from a single-institute survey

Overview of the implementation of COVID-19 vaccination strategies and vaccine deployment plans in the EU/EEA. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control

COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and hesitancy in dialysis staff: first results from New York City

Project COVERED emergency department network. Vaccination rates and acceptance of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among US emergency department health care personnel

COVID-19 vaccine uptake among healthcare workers in the fourth country to authorize BNT162b2 during the first month of rollout

Association of demographic and occupational factors with SARS-CoV-2 vaccine uptake in a multi-ethnic UK healthcare workforce: a rapid real-world analysis

Associations of race/ethnicity and other demographic and socioeconomic factors with vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States

Psychological characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance in Ireland and the United Kingdom

SARS-CoV-2 vaccines for cancer patients: a call to action