key: cord-0932664-l6x1tgj0 authors: Bao, Huilan title: Relationship among Family Support, Mental Resilience and Diabetic Distress in Patients with Type 2 Diabetic Mellitus during COVID-19 date: 2021-08-03 journal: Iran J Public Health DOI: 10.18502/ijph.v50i8.6811 sha: b7734dd905011d9e3cdef00a32e70d2a32c86f71 doc_id: 932664 cord_uid: l6x1tgj0 BACKGROUND: To promote the treatment effects and self-management behaviors of the patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) during the COVID-19 pandemic, this study empirically investigated the relationship among family support (FMS), mental resilience (MR) and diabetic distress (DD) in patients with T2DM. METHOD: Overall, 256 patients with T2DM from the Department of Endocrinology, Jinhua People’s Hospital, ZheJiang, China were selected and measured for their perceptions of FMS, MR and DD from 2019–2020. Based on the measurements, the difference and correlation matrix under different background variables were studied by one-way variance and correlation analysis. A structural equation was used to analyze the causal path among the measurements. RESULTS: Patients that differ in marital status, annual family income, medical insurance level, number of complications, and with/without insulin injection therapy were significantly different in their perception of FMS, MR and DD. FMS and MR had a significant negative correlation with DD. FMS used MR as an intermediary variable that affected DD. CONCLUSION: Diabetes education, improved medical insurance levels, and targeted psychological consultation for patients could effectively improve their MR and alleviate DD. Diabetes is a chronic disease that requires longterm treatment and strict self-management to control blood sugar and complications. This disease could cause serious mental burdens on patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (1) . According to the International Diabetes Federation, the number of diagnosed diabetes patients may rise to 693 million in 2045 (2) . If the patients' distressed state were not addressed, the treatment effect of the patients would be lowered (3) . During the COVID-19 pandemic, we observed a significant increase in the number of patients with T2DM who suffered diabetic distress (DD) in the Endocrinology Department, Jinhua People's Hospital (an A-grade hospital in eastern China). These DD are affected by family support (FMS) and mental resilience (MR) (4) . If the impacts of FMS and MR on DD could be understood, the corresponding psychological interventions could be implemented, thereby improving the treatment effects. To empirically study the relationship among FMS, MR and DD, we selected 256 patients with T2DM as the samples. DD has several negative effects on patients' treatment compliance and self-management behavior (5) . The related studies could be categorized into three streams. The first stream focused on the influencing factors of DD. For example, the younger patients had high degrees of DD than older people (6) . A long diabetes course could increase the complications, thereby aggravating the patient's DD (7) . A significantly positive correlation existed between the patient's body mass index and DD (8) . A high glycated hemoglobin level indicated high DD. This indicator had a significantly positive correlation with regimen-related distress (9, 10) . Patients who used intensive insulin therapy had high degrees of DD (11) . High sleep quality, physical exercise, diabetes education and diet control could alleviate the patients' DD (12) (13) (14) . The second stream focused on the impact of social support on the patients' DD. For example, a correlation existed between FMS and psychological results (e.g., the medical attitudes, hopes and needs) (15) . The perception of FMS was positively correlated with the life quality and psychological status of patients (16, 17) . Supports from family members and peers could effectively reduce the patient's DD (18) . The third stream focused on the impacts of mental health and behavioral control on the patients' DD. For example, good self-psychological adjustment could significantly reduce DD (19) . When the patient's self-efficacy level was high, the degree of DD was low (20) . MR had a positive impact on alleviating the patients' DD (21, 22) . Patients with low MR might have high levels of DD and poor blood sugar control (23) . The patients' MR and FMS are closely related to their DD. However, no complete framework ex-ists to study the relationship among them. We aimed to examine the above issues and focused on the influencing mechanism and paths of relationship among FMS, MR and DD. Overall, 312 patients with T2DM were selected from the department of endocrinology of the Jinhua People's hospital in eastern China during the COVID-19 (from Jan 2019 to Dec 2020). The patients were fully informed of the purpose of the survey. We excluded the patients with cancer and mental illness. Finally, we had 256 samples, with an effective rate of 82.05%. The age of the samples ranged from 25 to 78 years old. Totally, 109 were male and 147 were female (Table 1) . We first measured the FMS, MR and DD of the patients using the PSSS, CD-RISC and DDS17 scales. Secondly, ANOVA was used to calculate the in-group differences under different background variables. Thirdly, the Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation among the FMS, MR and DD. Finally, the structural equation model was used to detect the causal path among them. We selected the dimension of FMS in the PSSS scale developed by Zimmet et al. (2001) to measure the patient's perception of FMS (24) . There are four items in this dimension, and a sevenpoint Likert scale was used (1 for "strongly disagree" and 7 for "strongly agree"). The total score was higher than 16, which denoted that the patient received an acceptable level of FMS. The Cronbach's α was 0.885, the KMO was 0.828, and the Bartlett test result was χ 2 = 572.765, df = 6, p = 0.000 < 0.05, indicating that the scale had good reliability and validity. The total FMS score of the samples in this study was 20.78 ± 5.17, among which the scores of items 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 5.22 ± 1.270, 5.57 ± 1.152, 5.17 ± 1.342, and 5.59 ± 1.148, respectively. Table 2 shows the statistical description of the FMS. 11.14 ± 3.122, respectively. Table 3 shows the statistical description of the samples' MR. The average MR score of the samples was larger than 2.5 and less than 3, indicating that the MR of the patients was above average. Table 4 shows the statistical description of the DD of the samples. Ninety-seven patients had moderate distress, whereas 52 had severe distress. According to the evaluation standards (27), 58.2% of the patients surveyed in this study had a relatively high degree of mental distress. We used a one-way analysis of variance to analyze the differences in the scores of FMS, MR and DD of patients under 11 background variables, including gender, age, education level, marital status, and family income ( Table 5 ). The results were showed as follows: 1. Differences in marital status, family annual income, and medical insurance level led to significantly differences in FMS. The patients' age, education level, diabetes course, blood sugar control status, insulin injections, and oral hypoglycemic drugs taken were not highly correlated with FMS. We used Pearson correlation analysis to examine the correlation among FMS, MR and DD. The results are shown in Table 6 . (i) FMS was signifi-cantly and positively correlated with MR (r = 0.418) and was significantly negative correlated to DD (r = -0.421). (ii) MR was significantly and negatively correlated with DD. The highest negative correlation with EB was r = -0.682. We used the structural equation model to analyze the influencing path between FMS, MR and DD. Taking FMS as a dominant variable and the MR and DD as latent variables, the path analysis results between the three variables are shown in Fig. 1 . First, the initial model of Fig. 1 was modified twice by using the modification indices. χ 2 /df = 1.724 < 2, GFI = 0.957 > 0.9, and AGFI = 0.912 > 0.9 showed that the causal path diagram model in Fig. 1 fitted well with the actual data. RMSEA = 0.057 < 0.08, CFI = 0.933 > 0.9, IFI = 0.962 > 0.9 and NNFI = 0.936 > 0.9 showed that the model's fitness in Fig. 1 was good Second, Fig.1 showed that the path coefficients of FMS to MR, MR to DD, and FMS to DD were 0.429, -0.743 and -0.024, respectively. The Bootstrap test showed that the confidence interval of the total effect was (-0.423, -0.104) < 0, P = 0.001, the indirect effect was (-0.381, -0.143) < 0, P = 0.001, and the direct effect was (-0.146, 0.035), P = 0.287, indicating that the FMS did not directly affect DD, but had an impact on DD through the mediation of MR. The T2DM patient's perception of FMS was highly correlated with the marital status. The married group had the highest degree of FMS, and the "married but separated" group had the lowest perception of FMS. The "married with spouse" group had the best health status. The result showed that a high perception of FMS had a significant contribution to the patient's health. The patient's MR is most affected by education level, annual family income, and medical insurance level. (i) The MR levels of the patients in the "junior college and above" and "senior high school or technical secondary school" groups were significantly higher than the other groups. The patients in the former two groups had better adaptability when facing difficulties. (ii) The patients with poor (good) family financial status had low (high) levels of MR. (iii) The patients with high (low) level of medical insurance had the highest (lowest) levels of MR. The patient's DD is significantly impacted by the medical insurance levels and diabetes courses. (i) The patients with high medical insurance have significantly lower DD than those with low medical insurance. (ii) The patients with long disease course had significantly high levels of DD. (iii) Insulin injection therapy had a significant impact on the patient's DD, whereas oral hypoglycemic drugs had no significant impact on the patient's DD. A significant positive (negative) correlation existed between FMS and MR (DD). A significant negative correlation was found between MR and DD. The FMS did not directly affect DD. MR was an important intermediary variable between FMS and DD. The results showed that if the patients can improve MR, then they can alleviate DD. This conclusion was similar to another study (28) . MR strategies can help control the blood sugar levels of patients with diabetes and significantly improve the selfmanagement behavior and physical and mental health of patients. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the marital status, family income, medical insurance level, number of complications, and insulin injection therapy of patients with T2DM had significant impacts on the their FMS, MR, and DD. FMS had a significant positive correlation with MR and a significant negative correlation with DD. MR had a significant negative correlation with DD, and MR completely mediated the relationship between FMS and DD. When the patients' family income and medical insurance levels cannot be improved, the following actions are recommended. (i) The medical staff should educate the patients on insulin injection therapy and help them understand methods of reducing diabetes complications, which can significantly reduce the patients' DD. (ii) Patients with family or marital problems and low MR need to seek help from a counsellor to reduce their DD level. Ethical issues (Including plagiarism, informed consent, misconduct, data fabrication and/or falsification, double publication and/or submission, redundancy, etc.) have been completely observed by the authors. Correlates of diabetes-related distress in type 2 diabetes: Findings from the benchmarking network for clinical and humanistic outcomes in diabetes (BENCH-D) study IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045 Peer support to decrease diabetesrelated distress in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: design of a randomised controlled trial Putting PAID to diabetes-related distress: the potential utility of the problem areas in diabetes (PAID) scale in patients with diabetes The Mental Health Comorbidities of Diabetes Diabetes-related emotional distress in adults: Reliability and validity of the Norwegian versions of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID) and the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS) Diabetes-related distress over the course of illness: results from the Diacourse study Factors associated with diabetes-related distress: implications for diabetes self-management Longitudinal relationship between diabetes-specific emotional distress and follow-up HbA1c in adults with Type 1 diabetes mellitus The Relation between Diabetes-Related Distress and Glycemic Control The psychological impact of living with diabetes: Descriptive findings from the DAWN2 study in Denmark Influencing Factors of the Diabetes Distress among Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Hypoglycemia in People with Type 2 Diabetes and CKD Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: development of the diabetes distress scale Correlates of psychological outcomes among family members of people with diabetes in the second Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN2™) study Relationship between health-related quality of life, perceived family support and unmet health needs in adult patients with multimorbidity attending primary care in Portugal: A multicentre crosssectional study US ethnic group differences in selfmanagement in the 2nd diabetes attitudes, wishes and needs (DAWN2) study The relationship between diabetes-related distress and clinical variables and perceived support among adults with type 2 diabetes: A prospective study A comparison of self-care activities and diabetes distress among type II diabetic patients in urban and rural field practice area: a crosssectional study The psychosocial self-efficacy in adolescents with type 1 diabetes Staying Positive: Positive Affect as a Predictor of Resilience in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes The association of personal resilience with stress, coping, and diabetes outcomes in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: Variableand person-focused approaches Associations of changes in psychosocial factors and their interactions with diabetes distress in patients with type 2 diabetes: A longitudinal study Global and societal implications of the diabetes epidemic Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) Assessment of Diabetes-Related Distress When Is Diabetes Distress Clinically Meaningful? Establishing cut points for the Diabetes Distress Scale Occupational Therapy Intervention Improves Glycemic Control and Quality of Life Among Young Adults with Diabetes: the Resilient, Empowered, Active Living With Diabetes (REAL Diabetes) Randomized Controlled Trial The study was supported by the program No 2019A453 granted by KJJ.JINHUA, Zhejiang of China. The authors declared that they have no competing interests.