key: cord-0932151-acy7mkj4 authors: Trottier, Julie; Darques, Regis; Mouheb, Nassim Ait; Partiot, Emma; Bakhache, William; Deffieu, Maika S.; Gaudin, Raphael title: Post-lockdown detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the wastewater of Montpellier, France date: 2020-08-09 journal: One Health DOI: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2020.100157 sha: 2bde41430992aa5ff0d6c1a7d68046e1c60a2eab doc_id: 932151 cord_uid: acy7mkj4 The evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic can be monitored through the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in sewage. Here, we measured the amount of SARS-CoV-2 RNA at the inflow point of the main waste water treatment plant (WWTP) of Montpellier, France. We collected samples 4 days before the end of lockdown and up to 70 days post-lockdown. We detected increased amounts of SARS-CoV-2 RNA at the WWTP from mid-June on, whereas the number of new COVID-19 cases in the area started increasing a couple of weeks later. Future epidemiologic investigations shall explain such asynchronous finding. SARS-CoV-2 is the etiologic agent responsible for the current coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Wastewater-based epidemiology represents an attractive strategy to surveil the evolution of virus circulation in populations (Carducci et al., 2020 , O'Brien & Xagoraraki, 2019 , contributing to cost-effective virus control without infringing on individual liberties. About half of symptomatic patients persistently shed SARS-CoV-2 RNA in their feces at levels going up to 10 8 RNA copies per stool sample (Chen et al., 2020 , Wolfel et al., 2020 , which means that a single patient can shed billions of SARS-CoV-2 RNA copies in the wastewater at a time. Moreover, an asymptomatic child was recently reported as negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA based on throat swab specimen, while his stools were positive , suggesting that symptomatic and asymptomatic persons are likely to release SARS-CoV-2 RNA in city sewerages. Of note, subgenomic viral RNA was not detected in stools (Wolfel et al., 2020) , e.g. no infectious virus is shed (although this finding remains to be further investigated). Several reports indicate that SARS-CoV-2 RNA was readily detected in wastewater, and it is proposed that such approach could anticipate the occurrence of novel COVID-19 outbreaks in low prevalence regions (Ahmed et al., 2020 , La Rosa et al., 2020 , Medema et al., 2020 , Orive et al., 2020 , Randazzo et al., 2020 , Wurtzer et al., 2020 . The end of the stringent lockdown (that occurred in France on May 11 th ) is therefore an adequate time to measure the re-emergence of the virus through the monitoring of wastewater. Here, we collected effluent composite samples (using a 24-hour automatic sampler) in wastewater upstream of the main waste water treatment plant (WWTP) of Montpellier metropolitan area located in Lattes, France, which receives the wastewater from ≈ 470 000 inhabitants. The sampling dates were May 7 th , 18 th , 26 th , June 4 th , 15 th , 25 th , and July 20 th to monitor SARS-CoV-2 RNA expression levels during lockdown and up to 70 days after its end. During this period, the virus was still circulating in the area, but the incidence was relatively low (number of newly diagnosed COVID-19 patients per day < 20). Collected wastewater was processed as follows: on the day of water collection, samples were maintained at 4°C for transport and immediately cleared by centrifugation at 4500 g for 30 min at 4°C. The supernatant was passed through a 40 µm cell strainer (Corning) to remove large floating components. At this stage, the samples were frozen at -20°C for later analyses with samples collected at other timepoints. Upon thawing, RNAs were concentrated on a Vivaspin 50 kDa MWCO filter membrane (Sartorius). Starting from 50 ml of water, the sample was concentrated down a hundred times to an adjusted volume of 500 µl. RNA extraction was performed using the NucleoSpin RNA Virus kit (Macherey-Nagel), including harsh lysis conditions (lysis buffer enriched in guanidinium isothiocyanate heat at 70°C for 5 min). RT-qPCR was performed on 10 µl of purified RNA using the highly sensitive TaqPath One-Step RT-qPCR, CG master mix (ThermoFisher Scientific). The N1 and N3 primer/probe sets designed by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) were used to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA and a standard curve was run in parallel using a positive control plasmid (Integrated DNA Technologies) coding for the nucleoprotein (N) of SARS-CoV-2. Using RNA extracted from Vero E6 cells either non-infected or infected with SARS-CoV-2 in vitro, we showed that the N1 and N3 primer/probe sets recognized solely the RNA from infected cells (Table 1) . A recent study used a Dengue virus (DENV) sequence surrogate to determine PCR efficiency (Medema et al., 2020) . However, autochthonous cases of Dengue virus have been reported in Montpellier area (European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control) and thus, we could not use this RNA sequence for control, as it could be contained naturally in the wastewater of Montpellier (through infected mosquito eggs for instance). In contrast, Ebola virus has not reached Europe, and hopefully never will, and therefore, no Ebola RNA would "contaminate" our PCR efficiency reading. Here, we used a sensitive primer/probe set previously described (Ro et al., 2017) that target the complementary DNA of the VP40-encoding RNA of Ebola virus (Zaire strain) to assess the RT-qPCR efficiency intrinsic to each sample. First, we showed that the Ebola standard (Ebo Std) primer/probe set was not detecting RNA from SARS-CoV-2-infected Vero E6 cells (Table 1) . Using water samples from upstream WWTP of the Montpellier metropolitan area collected on June 15 th , we found that the Ebo Std primer/probe set gave no signal while the primer/probes N1, N3, and RLP27 (targeting the human rlp27 gene) returned positive signals (Table 1 ). In comparison, the nearby WWTP of Murviel-lès-Montpellier, treating the wastewater from 2 000 inhabitants, and a Montpellieran household in which no one was sick nor had symptoms, were negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA on May 29, 2020. Collectively, these data show that N1 and N3 are relatively sensitive and specific for SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection. A synthetic RNA sequence of 91 nucleotides (gcagaucgaauccacucaggccaaucuauggugaaugucauaucgggccccaaagugcuaaugaaguuuggcuuccucuaggugu cggcag) derived from the VP40-coding gene of Ebola virus and recognized by the above-mentioned Ebo Std primer/probe set was purchased (Integrated DNA Technologies) to be used as an internal normalization standard. Standard curves were run using the N control plasmid (N1 and N3 primer/probe sets) or the Ebo Std RNA (Ebo Std primer/probe set) to estimate copy numbers ( Figure 1 ). Of note, the Ebo Std primer/probe set was less sensitive than N1 and N3, probably because the Ebo Std synthetic template RNA is relatively fragile and short (91 nucleotides). Standard curves of the N1 (left), N3 (middle) and Ebo Std (right) primer/probe sets showing the cycle threshold (Ct) value at indicated template copy number. The mean +/-SD of duplicates from a representative experiment is shown performed at least three times. Next, we measured the SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels using N1 and N3 primer/probe sets in wastewater collected upstream of the main WWTP of the Montpellier metropolitan area on May 7 th , 18 th , 26 th , June 4 th , 15 th , 25 th , and July 20 th (Figure 2A ). Our data highlights that the wastewater from the three later dates (June 15 th , 25 th , and July 20 th ) contained about fifty-fold more SARS-CoV-2 RNA than from previous dates. We confirmed that our RT-qPCR reaction was working properly for each sample using Ebo Std. Sample-to-sample variation of PCR efficiency was negligible compared to the magnitude of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA increase observed, as depicted by the similar curves of raw versus corrected datasets (Supplementary Figure S1) . Similarly, inlet water flowrate entering the WWTP was varying by less than 25% and rain precipitations (Montpellier wastewater network is partially unitary) were also very low (between 0 and 2 mm of rain on the 24 h preceding sample collection). These variables were not incorporated in the calculations because they are negligibly impacting the shape of the curve. Moreover, the calculations required for thorough data normalization are not trivial. We then put in perspective the amount of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Montpellier wastewater ( Figure 2B ; purple line) with the number of new COVID-19 cases weekly recorded in the Hérault department (> 40% inhabitant living in the Montpellier metropolitan area). Interestingly, an 3-4 times increase in the number of newly diagnosed COVID-19 patients was starting early July compared to May ( Figure 2B ; green line). Of note, the outlier 58 newly diagnosed COVID-19 patients from week 17-23 May is surprisingly high, which may be linked to readjustments following the creation of a new virological testing database as of May 13 (the former public database reporting only 25 cases). In contrast to new COVID-19 cases, the number of hospitalized COVID-19 patients kept decreasing over the same period ( Figure 2B ; blue line). This later observation is less relevant to measure the immediacy of the epidemic's resurgence as this parameter suffers high patient-to-patient variability. The surge in the number of new COVID-19 patients started roughly 2-3 weeks after the increase of SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels in wastewater ( Figure 2B ). Our data are reminiscent of a recent Spanish study, in which the authors could detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater several weeks before the first COVID-19 cases were reported (Randazzo et al., 2020) . However, they could not see a correlation between SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels in wastewater and the number of newly diagnosed COVID-19 patients. Along the same lines, Medema & colleagues showed a correlation between the cumulative cases of COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 RNA although the data were not correlated as a function of time (Medema et al., 2020) . A work in Paris, France is ongoing to further determine the temporal correlation between wastewater SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels and COVID-19 epidemiological features (Wurtzer et al., 2020) . In conclusion, we report effective detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the wastewater of Montpellier area upstream of the treatment plant and identified an increase of the amount of detected viral RNA mid-June, associated with a rising number of newly identified COVID-19 cases in the department. Although a delayed correlation may exit, further investigations are required to better characterize the intricate relationship between these two variables. Indeed, we are unable at this stage to determine whether this increase announces an upcoming relapse of the epidemics in the area or relates to intrinsic SARS-CoV-2 RNA variations associated with uneven virus shedding (from patientto-patient and depending on the stage of the disease for a given patient). Moreover, various other parameters might also impact these results, such as people from distant clusters moving to second homes and tourist accommodation, the chronic underestimation of prevalence rates, or local variability in the geographical pattern of virus spread. These hypotheses are non-exclusive and future multiparametric investigations are required to routinely use wastewater surveillance as a powerful predictive tool for ongoing and future epidemic outbreaks. The number of SARS-CoV-2 RNA copies was measured using either the N1 or N3 primer/probe sets. Each dot corresponds to the concentration of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater measured from the sum of the RNA copy number calculated from two RNA extractions and four RT-qPCR reactions performed in two individual runs. The first five samples were treated in parallel and therefore, differences in these samples cannot be attributed to experimental variation. Sterile water wells were included in duplicates for each primer/probe set in each plate as negative control and returned "No Ct" (not shown on the graph). PCR efficiency, rain precipitation and flowrates were negligible and not considered in the calculation. The green dotted line indicates the end of the strict lockdown in France. The black line corresponds to the smoothened average of the N1 and N3 primer/probe sets. ND: not detected. (B) The graph shows the number of new positive patients in the Hérault department over a 7-day period (green; left axis) as a function of time (source: SI-DEP; Santé Publique France) and on the right Y axis, the average SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels measured with the N1 and N3 primer/probe sets (purple). First confirmed detection of SARS-CoV-2 in untreated wastewater in Australia: A proof of concept for the wastewater surveillance of COVID-19 in the community Making Waves: Coronavirus detection, presence and persistence in the water environment: State of the art and knowledge needs for public health The presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the feces of COVID-19 patients First detection of SARS-CoV-2 in untreated wastewaters in Italy Presence of SARS-Coronavirus-2 RNA in Sewage and Correlation with Reported COVID-19 Prevalence in the Early Stage of the Epidemic in The Netherlands. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 0: null O'Brien E, Xagoraraki I (2019) A water-focused one-health approach for early detection and prevention of viral outbreaks Early SARS-CoV-2 outbreak detection by sewage-based epidemiology SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater anticipated COVID-19 occurrence in a low prevalence area Rapid detection and quantification of Ebola Zaire virus by one-step real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction Detection of Novel Coronavirus by RT-PCR in Stool Specimen from Asymptomatic Child Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019 Prolonged presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in faecal samples Evaluation of lockdown impact on SARS-CoV-2 dynamics through viral genome quantification in Paris wastewaters Infectious SARS-CoV-2 in Feces of Patient with Severe COVID-19 Characteristics of pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection and potential evidence for persistent fecal viral shedding We thank Jean Verdier and Nima Machouf for their helpful comments and suggestions, and Yonis Bare for technical assistance. The strain Beta CoV/France/IDF0372/2020 was supplied by the National Reference Centre for Respiratory Viruses hosted by Institut Pasteur (Paris, France) and headed by Dr. Sylvie van der Werf.