key: cord-0930539-xyfnk6hv authors: La Verde, Giuseppe; Artiola, Valeria; La Commara, Marco; D’Avino, Vittoria; Angrisani, Leopoldo; Sabatino, Giuseppe; Pugliese, Mariagabriella title: COVID-19 and the Additional Radiological Risk during the Lockdown Period in the Province of Naples City (South Italy) date: 2022-02-07 journal: Life (Basel) DOI: 10.3390/life12020246 sha: 5e30970033fb8337b40679514da2970670ccfe57 doc_id: 930539 cord_uid: xyfnk6hv The lockdown restrictions, as a first solution to contain the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, have affected everyone’s life and habits, including the time spent at home. The latter factor has drawn attention to indoor air quality and the impact on human health, particularly for chemical pollutants. This study investigated how the increasing time indoor influenced exposure to natural radioactive substances, such as radon gas. To calculate the radiological risk, we considered the most consolidated indices used for radiation protection: annual effective dose, excess lifetime cancer risk, and the lung cancer case. Furthermore, two different exposure times were considered: pre-lockdown and post-lockdown. The lockdown increased the indoor exposure time by 4% and, consequently, the radiological risk factors by 9%. Furthermore, the reference value of 300 Bq/m(3), considered acceptable for human radiation protection, may need to be lowered further in the case of conditions similar to those of the lockdown period. The spread of the COVID-19 disease [1] has imposed several changes in the habits of the entire world population, affecting, above all, both the economic and social spheres [2] . The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommended a lockdown to contain the disease [3] , a suggestion that was approved by several nations, including Italy [4, 5] . This first containment action was due to an initial lack of knowledge of the biology and of pathway transmission of the virus, also reflecting the evolution of the risk perception [6] . The initial assumption was that the virus was airborne and therefore linked to environmental conditions [7] , and thus people who were in lockdown often preferred to stay indoors, avoiding air changes from the outside. Therefore, as a result of the lockdown and the stopping of most production and transport activities, the reduction of emissions improved the quality of the outdoor air [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] and water [17, 18] . The study of indoor air quality (IAQ), which has increasingly attracted scientific interest due to its close correlation with human health [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] , has also been deepened in relation to this pandemic [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] , uniquely highlighting the worsening of IAQ. The results confirm that the lockdown has increased the concentration of indoor pollutants, especially chemicals such as CO 2 , PM 2.5 , PM 10 , NO 2 , SO 2 , and volatile organic compounds (VOCs); otherwise, to date, there have been few evaluations on exposure to radioactive substances normally found indoors [32] . From a radiological point of view, the direct consequence of the lockdown measure is the increase in time spent indoors by the population, which has effectively increased the exposure to radioactive elements naturally produced by the Earth's crust and/or building materials. Among these kinds of pollutants, probably the most important one is radon-222 ( 222 Rn). 222 Rn is a noble gas generated by the radioactive decay of 238 U and characterised by a half-life of 3.8 days. The health risk of this gas is given by its progeny ( 218 Po, 214 Pb, 214 Bi, 214 Po), which can cause serious DNA damage due to the emission of alpha particles [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] . In fact, alpha particles have a high LET, and thus they have the ability to deposit high quantities of energy in small distances [38] . Because of its potential adverse effects, 222 Rn has been classified by the WHO as a health hazard and the primary cause of lung cancer in non-smokers [39] . Due to its relevance, there are many studies regarding its distribution, the processes that favour indoor accumulation, and the impact on health. For example, our research group has focused its attention on the analysis of the concentration distribution of natural radionuclides, especially radon gas in the territory of South Italy [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] , as well as on the investigations on several aspects of both natural and artificial radioactivity concerning in particular the structure, the decay modes, and the optical model calculations of light radioactive isotopes [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] . As previously mentioned, the inhalation of radon gas can lead to several forms of damage to one's health [66, 67] . The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) has published several fundamental recommendations to ensure the safety of both workers and the general population from exposure to 222 Rn [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] . Furthermore, in 2013, with the introduction of the European Directive EURATOM 59/2013 [74] , the evaluation of indoor air quality was required from the UE nations for the first time. In particular, the directive states that the reference level for 222 Rn activity concentration in the air is equal to 300 Bq/m 3 both for workplace (art. 54) and for other environments, such as homes (art. 74). In 2020, Italy implemented the directive with the Italian Decree n.101 [75] . There are different parameters that are used to evaluate radon-correlated health risk. Among these, those worth mentioning are the annual effective dose (AED), excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR), and the lung cancer case (LCC). These values have been proposed by UNSCEAR, who also offer the method for their calculation [76] . In this study, the assessment of the health risk due to inhalation of 222 Rn during the lockdown was conducted in various countries of Naples, found in the Campania region (South Italy), using radon gas activity concentration values obtained in previous territorial characterisation surveys, constituting our database. Exposure time is one of the parameters used to estimate the radiological risk of radon gas. The ICRP 93 report [35] states that people spend, on average, 7000 h/year at home and 2000 h/year at the workplace. However, with the forced isolation measures imposed to avoid the spread of COVID-19, the hours spent at home considerably increased. In Italy, since the lockdown lasted for 2 months, the time spent at home was equal to 7293 h/year. Hence, in this study, the values obtained through the evaluation of the exposure risk due to 222 Rn in normal conditions were compared with the ones calculated considering 2 months of lockdown. The study of the radiological risk was conducted in 19 of the 92 municipalities of the province of Naples, located in the Campania region (South Italy), for a total of 496 measurements of activity concentration of 222 Rn. The sampling area is characterised by very peculiar geological settings [77] . For instance, the traditional construction system used in this region involves the use of several stones of volcanic origins, such as tuff, which, as it is known, can influence a greater accumulation of radon indoors. In fact, radon mean activity concentration calculated in this study area, equal to 107 ± 30 Bq/m 3 , is higher than the national average level (≈75 Bq/m 3 ) [78] . As previously mentioned, several factors are considered fundamental in the estimation of health risks linked to air quality. In this study, the analyses were conducted through the calculation of The annual effective dose; • The excess lifetime cancer risk; • The lung cancer case. The AED, a parameter used to define the dose absorbed by the general population subjected to gas radon exposure in a year, was calculated using the Equation (1) found in the UNSCEAR 2000 report [76] : where C Rn represents radon concentration, C inh (Rn), which is equal to 9 nSv h Bq m −3 [76] , being the effective dose coefficient for indoor radon exposure; F eq is the equilibrium factor equal to 0.4; F occ is the occupation factor, equal to 1 for the analyses post-lockdown period and 0.8 for the pre-lockdown period; and T is the exposure time, expressed in hours. The ELCR indicates the likelihood of developing cancer later in life due to exposure to ionising radiation. The ELCR is given by the following Equation (2): where DL is the average lifespan of the population and RF is the risk of fatal cancer in sieverts. In particular, the former factor for inhabitants of Naples was equal to 77.2 years for men and 82.2 for women [79] . According to the ICRP 2007 report [69] , the RF factor is equal to 5.5 × 10 −2 Sv −1 . The LCC is a factor calculated per year per million people and it considers the probability for people to develop lung cancer due to exposure to radiation. The LCC is calculated through employing the following Equation (3): where 18 × 10 −6 indicates the probability of developing cancer [80] . The annual average 222 Rn activity concentrations were divided into four groups on the basis of the mean concentration in order to illustrate the distribution of the measurements. The obtained results are listed in Table 1 , and the variability of the concentration values are shown in Figure 1 . Most of the analysed houses were characterised by a radon activity concentration lower than 100 Bq/m 3 , while only 12 of them showed a 222 Rn concentration higher than the reference level of 300 Bq/m 3 [73, 75] . All the health risk factors were evaluated in two different conditions: pre-and post-lockdown. For reference values, ICRP 137 data were used [73] . To evaluate radon effective dose, we used the mean activity concentration values, taking into account the pre-and post-lockdown periods. To evaluate the AED, we used Equation (1). The results are listed in Table 2 : The comparison between the AED values obtained using the different exposure times shows that the results relative to the post-lockdown period were 9% higher than the ones obtained when considering the exposure time of 7000 h/year indicated in [68] , an increment observed for all the following parameters. Most of the analysed houses were characterised by a radon activity concentration lower than 100 Bq/m 3 , while only 12 of them showed a 222 Rn concentration higher than the reference level of 300 Bq/m 3 [73, 75] . All the health risk factors were evaluated in two different conditions: pre-and post-lockdown. For reference values, ICRP 137 data were used [73] . To evaluate radon effective dose, we used the mean activity concentration values, taking into account the pre-and post-lockdown periods. To evaluate the AED, we used Equation (1). The results are listed in Table 2 : Table 2 . AED values before and after the lockdown period for mean value of each radon range. The comparison between the AED values obtained using the different exposure times shows that the results relative to the post-lockdown period were 9% higher than the ones obtained when considering the exposure time of 7000 h/year indicated in [68] , an increment observed for all the following parameters. For the ranges 0-100 Bq/m 3 and 100-200 Bq/m 3 , the AED values were well below the reference value of 6.05 mSv/year [73] , as it was expected that AED would be greater than the reference for concentrations in the range >300 Bq/m 3 . On the contrary, the AEDs calculated for the range 200-300 Bq/m 3 were below the reference for both the pre-and post-lockdown periods when calculated with the average values (Table 2) ; however, analysing in detail each measurement point and the corresponding AEDs, we found that 9 homes out of 25 (36% of the total) had radon activity concentration values ≥274 Bq/m 3 , representing an interesting and critical value at the same time. In fact, as shown in Table 3 , 2 months of lockdown influenced the exposure and consequently the AED, which from values below 6.05 mSv/year all became worryingly greater than the reference value. The ELCR index is a fundamental tool used in radiobiology to estimate the health risk due to indoor radon. In particular, this parameter offers a clear view of the great impact of the lockdown measure, leading to a significant increase in the probability of developing cancer. The ELCR values calculated with Equation (2), for both the pre-and post-lockdown conditions, are listed in Table 4 . Table 4 . ELCR values before and after the lockdown measure for mean value of each concentration range. For ELCR, the trend did not change, as in precedence, and therefore we report the details of the cases in which the impact of the lockdown was evident (Table 5) , exceeding the reference level of 2.66 × 10 −2 [73] . This trend was even more sensational when ELCR was analysed by gender. Considering the ELCR calculated for a general average age 79.7 years and for the postlockdown period, we found that the radon activity concentration value corresponding to an ELCR greater than the reference of 2.66 × 10 −2 was 276 ± 77 Bq/m 3 (ELCR = 2.67 × 10 −2 ). On the contrary, making an analysis by gender and therefore by different life expectancies, we found that for men, the post-lockdown ELCR varied from 2.52 × 10 −2 to 2.80 × 10 −2 , and the critical value of radon concentration, corresponding to a value higher than the reference level, was 294 ± 82 Bq/m 3 (building #5). The post-lockdown scenario was different for women, for whom ELCR varied from 2.68 × 10 −2 to 2.98 × 10 −2 , and the critical radon concentration value corresponding to an ELCR higher than the reference was 269 ± 75 Bq/m 3 (building #10). As previously mentioned, the LCC per million people indicates the number of individuals affected by lung cancer in a year, and it was evaluated using Equation (3) . As was the case with the other parameters analysed previously, the LCC strongly depended on the value of the exposure time. The results pre-and post-pandemic are indicated in Table 6 . The results show that, while maintaining a 9% increase due to the lockdown period, for radon activity concentrations < 300 Bq/m 3 , the LLC was <108.86, the reference value for ICRP [73] . These data must be carefully considered since lung cancer is characterised by a very high incidence and mortality rate [81] . According to the Associazione Italiana Oncologia Medica (AIOM), in Italy, the trend in incidence is different between the male gender, for which a significant reduction was observed (−6.5% compared to 2019), and the female gender, for which there was a sharp increase (+2.5%). Moreover, in 2020, approximately 41,000 new diagnoses were expected [82] . Therefore, LCC is, without a doubt, a fundamental tool from the radiobiological standpoint. As previously mentioned, radon gas is one of the most dangerous indoor air pollutants, having a radiological effect on humans. There are several parameters used to analyse the radiobiological risk linked to this gas, most of them dependant on the exposure time. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the variation of these parameters due to the lockdown measure imposed in 2020. In fact, the spread of COVID-19 has led to forced isolation necessary to limit the infection, effectively increasing the time spent indoors. As a direct consequence, there has been an augmentation in the exposure time to indoor pollutants, including radon gas. This study was conducted using a total of 496 222 Rn activity concentration measurements carried out in the Neapolitan area (South Italy). The concentration activity values were divided into four ranges of values, and the analysed indexes were as follows: the AED, EDL, ELCR, and LCC. All of them were estimated in pre-lockdown, and post-lockdown conditions were affected by the increase in indoor exposure time. Furthermore, some values defined as critical were also compared with the reference levels reported in ICRP 137, in the European Directive 59/2013 EURATOM, and in the national legislation [73] [74] [75] . The case of the 200-300 Bq/m 3 range was very interesting, for which the influence of the lockdown, which can be translated into an increase in indoor time, also caused the reference values for radon activity concentration to be exceeded, which are not normally considered. Thus, the results suggest that the new reference limit for an exposure time similar to that caused by the lockdown is no longer 300 Bq/m 3 , but 274 Bq/m 3 , as demonstrated by the results obtained for AED. Another interesting aspect is ELCR analysed by gender. In the pre-lockdown period, no radon activity concentration value between 269 and 300 Bq/m 3 corresponded to an ELRC greater than the reference of 2.66 × 10 −2 . On the contrary, in the post-lockdown period, the ELRC reference value was exceeded at radon activity concentrations of 293 ± 82 Bq/m 3 for men and, even more surprisingly, of 269 ± 75 Bq/m 3 for women. The LCC per million people, despite having been influenced by the post-lockdown period, was consistent with the reference values and therefore greater than 108.86 for values greater than 300 Bq/m 3 . In the next few years, it would be interesting to correlate the cases recorded and reported in national databases with those hypothesised in this study to understand if the lockdown had a real impact from an epidemiological point of view. Since the spread of COVID-19 has yet to be stopped, in the event of another lockdown or a similar scenario, the results reported in this study and the new knowledge acquired on the mechanisms of spread of the virus suggest increasing the air changes in the room to prevent the accumulation of radon gas. Remedial actions to reduce radon activity concentration, in fact, are widely known [83] , and among these, the cheapest and the one whose effectiveness has also been measured by our group [84] is passive ventilation: a greater exchange of air between the inside and outside by keeping windows and doors open, also producing an overall improvement in IAQ. Spread of Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19) from an Outbreak to Pandemic in the Year 2020 The 'Great Lockdown' and its determinants World Health Organization (WHO) Coronavirus Gazzetta Ufficiale della Republica Italiana n. 62, 09.03.2020. Covid-19, D.P.C.M. 09.03.2020. Available online Gazzetta Ufficiale della Republica Italiana n. 76 del 22.03.2020. Covid-19, Ulteriori Disposizioni Attuative Dl 6/2020 Indoor air quality and COVID-19 Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1 The short-term impacts of COVID-19 lockdown on urban air pollution in China Indirect impact of COVID-19 on environment: A brief study in Indian context COVID-19 lockdown and the impacts on air quality with emphasis on urban, suburban and rural zones Air quality during the COVID-19: PM2.5 analysis in the 50 most polluted capital cities in the world The Effect of the Covid-19 Lockdown on Air Quality in Three Italian Medium-Sized Cities. Atmosphere 2020 Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown on Air Pollution in 20 Major Cities around the World COVID-19 pandemic: Impacts on the air quality during the partial lockdown in São Paulo state Effect of lockdown amid COVID-19 pandemic on air quality of the megacity Delhi Lockdown caused by COVID−19 pandemic reduces air pollution in cities worldwide COVID-19 and surface water quality: Improved lake water quality during the lockdown COVID-19 lockdown measures reveal human impact on water transparency in the Venice Lagoon Indoor Air Quality and Health Indoor Exposure to Selected Air Pollutants in the Home Environment: A Systematic Review Indoor Air Quality Report to Congress on Indoor Air Quality USEPA: Washington, DC, USA Nature and Levels of Indoor Air Pollutants. In Indoor and Outdoor Air Pollution and Human Cancer; Monographs Changes in indoor pollutants since the 1950's Bad Air Can Also Kill: Residential Indoor Air Quality and Pollutant Exposure Risk during the COVID-19 Crisis Air quality changes in cities during the COVID-19 lockdown: A critical review Indoor Air Pollution was Nonnegligible during COVID-19 Lockdown Indoor Air Quality in Domestic Environments during Periods Close to Italian COVID-19 Lockdown Navas-Martín, M. Indoor Environmental Quality and Consumption Patterns before and during the COVID-19 Lockdown in Twelve Social Dwellings in Environmental Determinants of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Non-negligible contributions to human health from increased household air pollution exposure during the COVID-19 lockdown in China Radon Risks Assessment with the Covid-19 Lockdown Effects The effect of track structure on the induction of chromosomal aberrations in murine cells Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR VII) Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. In Man-Made Mineral Fibres and Radon Radon exposure: A major cause of lung cancer United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Biological Mechanisms of Radiation Actions at Low Doses; United Nations Gross alpha and beta radioactivity in surface soil and drinkable water around a steel processing facility WHO Handbook on Indoor Radon: A Public Health Perspective. In WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee Radon concentrations in schools of the Neapolitan area Gamma dose rate measurements in dwellings of Campania region, South Italy Radon Exposure Assessment for Sewerage System's Workers in Naples Indoor radon concentration measurements in some dwellings of the Penisola Sorrentina Radon concentrations in air and water in the thermal spas of Ischia Island Radon measurements and effective dose from radon inhalation estimation in the Neapolitan catacombs Indoor radon activity concentration measurements in the great historical museums of University of Indoor radon concentration and gamma dose rate in dwellings of the Province of Naples, South Italy, and estimation of the effective dose to the inhabitants Analysis of alpha particles spectra of the Radon and Thoron progenies generated by an electrostatic collection detector using new software Multi-parametric approach to the analysis of soil radon gas for its validation as geoindicator in two sites of the Phlegrean Fields caldera (Italy) Correlation of the activity concentration of gas radon in environments located on ground floor and underground level The equilibrium factor in the radon dose calculation in the archaeological site of Acquedotto Augusteo del Serino in Naples Radiation Protection Legislation and Sustainable Development of a Rural Green Tuff Village of Ischia Island Radon measurements in drinking water using electret according to Italian legislation and mapping of Campania region (Southern Italy) Natural radioactivity in soils and materials of the Campania region (Italy) Continuous radon monitoring during seven years of volcanic unrest at Campi Flegrei caldera (Italy) Gamma Index in a Typical Building Material of Ciglio Area (Ischia Island). Solid State Phenom The first radon potential map of the Campania region (southern Italy) Radon Survey in Bank Buildings of Campania Region According to the Italian Transposition of Euratom 59 Study of Surface Emissions of 220 Rn (Thoron) at Two Sites in the Campi Flegrei Caldera (Italy) during Volcanic Unrest in the Period Probing the potential and reaction coupling effects of 6,7 Li+ 28 Si at sub-and near-barrier energies with elastic backscattering Direct and compound-nucleus reaction mechanisms in the7Be+58Ni system at near-barrier energies Elastic scattering for the B8 and Be7+Pb208 systems at near-Coulomb barrier energies Total reaction cross sections for 8Li + 90Zr at near-barrier energies Study of Nuclear Structure of13C and20Ne by Low Energy Nuclear Reactions Fragmentation studies of relativistic iron ions using plastic nuclear track detectors Environmental/Occupational Exposure to Radon and Non-Pulmonary Neoplasm Risk: A Review of Epidemiologic Evidence General Overview of Radon Studies in Health Hazard Perspectives Protection Against Radon-222 at Home and at Work Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection Radiation Protection in Uranium and Other Mines Lung Cancer Risk from Radon and Progeny and Statement on Radon Radiological Protection against Radon Exposure Occupational Intakes of Radionuclides: Part 3 Gazz. Uff. UE n. L 296 del 7.11.2013). Available online Attuazione Della Direttiva 2013/59/Euratom che Stabilisce Norme Fondamentali di Sicurezza Relative Alla Protezione Contro i Pericoli Derivanti dall'esposizione Alle Radiazioni Ionizzanti Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. In Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation to the General Assembly Tectono-stratigraphic setting of the Campania region (southern Italy) Results of the Representative Italian National Survey on Radon Indoors Regione Campania (Demografia) First indoor radon mapping and assessment excess lifetime cancer risk in Iran Global Epidemiology of Lung Cancer Radon interventions around the globe: A systematic review Effectiveness of passive ventilation on radon indoor level in Puglia Region according to European Directive 2013/59/EURATOM Acknowledgments: We gratefully thank Svitlana Dronyuk for having contributed to the systematic organisation of data. The authors declare no conflict of interest.