key: cord-0926805-jrjaxr4y
authors: Leung, Kathy; Wu, Joseph T.
title: The gradual release exit strategy after lockdown against COVID-19
date: 2020-08-06
journal: The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific
DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2020.100008
sha: dd62aa939abd52c41cb18847303a8d5cd2a03780
doc_id: 926805
cord_uid: jrjaxr4y

nan

with no exit strategy (i.e. immediate returning to pre-epidemic state for all schools, workplaces and the community) whilst simultaneously reduces the epidemic peak size and thus the stress on the healthcare system. At the time of writing, it appears the actual reopening strategy, which is similar to GRES, has so far been successful at avoiding resurgence of case number in Singapore since the lockdown was lifted on 2 June.

As the first country to report COVID-19 detection outside China, Thailand issued a nationwide curfew (i.e. banning all people from leaving their homes from 10 pm to 4 am) on 3 April in response to the rapid increase of local cases in late March. The curfew was gradually lifted on 1 June and officially ended on 15 June with no local cases (for 21 days) since then. Similarly, after the nationwide lockdown between 1 and 15 April, Vietnam managed to reopen its economy gradually. Although targeted lockdown was extended to late April in 28 out of 63 provinces, Vietnam successfully kept the case number low and death count at zero [1] . Without explicitly elaborating their reopening plan, Vietnam brought its manufacturing sector back to growth again in June after the first five months' decline in 2020 [4] . Successful control of the pandemic in both countries has been attributable to several key factors, including rapid responses, proactive containment strategies, comprehensive tracing and testing, effective communication, and well-developed public health systems [ 5 , 6 ] .

The design of gradual release exit strategy depends on knowledge of the local transmission dynamics of COVID-19. GRES assumed immediate reopening of schools by adopting Singapore's actual practice, but the effects of school closure and reopening remain unclear. Uniform susceptibility was assumed across all age groups in GRES but recent studies suggested children and adolescents were less susceptible than adults [ 7 , 8 ] . Additionally, the effects of GRES were also sensitive to the assumption about the proportion of asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic infections, which subsequently affects the effectiveness of contact tracing and isolation. Due to the absence of sustained community outbreaks in Singapore, the authors did not attempt to calibrate the model with observed case data but parameterized it with assumed parameters such as R 0 = 2. The model would need to be updated dynamically over time by fitting more parameters to local observed data within Singapore after the lockdown is lifted.

In the absence of safe and effective vaccines, premature relaxation of lockdown with no exit strategy would substantially increase the case count and incur higher health and economic loss, even if the disease prevalence could be pushed down to prerelaxation level by rounds of tightening of control measures [9] . Gradual release exit strategies tailored to local situations should be implemented to provide sufficient planning for public health authorities and governments to alleviate the burden of social and economic well-being from lockdown.

We declare no competing Interest.

Modelling Lockdown and Exit Strategies for COVID-19 in Singapore

Interventions to mitigate early spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Singapore: a modelling study

Manufacturing output returns to growth in

Emerging covid-19 success story: Vietnam's commitment to containment

Strengths and vulnerabilities in Southeast Asia's response to the Covid-19 pandemic

Age-dependent effects in the transmission and control of COVID-19 epidemics

Household secondary attack rate of COVID-19 and associated determinants in Guangzhou, China: a retrospective cohort study

First-wave COVID-19 transmissibility and severity in China outside Hubei after control measures, and second-wave scenario planning: a modelling impact assessment