key: cord-0922230-2h0xww4v
authors: Fernández, Guillén
title: Protocol of the Healthy Brain Study: An accessible resource for understanding the human brain and how it dynamically and individually operates in its bio-social context
date: 2021-12-29
journal: PLoS One
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260952
sha: 98b6f61ab3bfadbd65e777c27b37d4341198efef
doc_id: 922230
cord_uid: 2h0xww4v

The endeavor to understand the human brain has seen more progress in the last few decades than in the previous two millennia. Still, our understanding of how the human brain relates to behavior in the real world and how this link is modulated by biological, social, and environmental factors is limited. To address this, we designed the Healthy Brain Study (HBS), an interdisciplinary, longitudinal, cohort study based on multidimensional, dynamic assessments in both the laboratory and the real world. Here, we describe the rationale and design of the currently ongoing HBS. The HBS is examining a population-based sample of 1,000 healthy participants (age 30–39) who are thoroughly studied across an entire year. Data are collected through cognitive, affective, behavioral, and physiological testing, neuroimaging, bio-sampling, questionnaires, ecological momentary assessment, and real-world assessments using wearable devices. These data will become an accessible resource for the scientific community enabling the next step in understanding the human brain and how it dynamically and individually operates in its bio-social context. An access procedure to the collected data and bio-samples is in place and published on https://www.healthybrainstudy.nl/en/data-and-methods/access. Trail registration: https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7955.

The human brain is seen as civilization's most precious resource [1], both creating and interacting with our increasingly complex environment, it enables us to be conscious and social human beings. Brain functioning also plays a pivotal role in major societal challenges such as health, demographic change, and well-being. Due to developments in different scientific fields, the endeavor to understand the human brain has seen more progress in the last few decades than in the two millennia before. However, we think that current brain research suffers from at least five key limitations and we set up the Healthy Brain Study (HBS) to tackle these five limitations together and, thereby, to facilitate our understanding of how the human brain relates to behavior in the real world and how this link is modulated by biological, social, and environmental factors. In the following paragraphs, we explain the five main design choices of the HBS. Firstly, a reductionist approach-in which researchers try to understand reality by focusing on a limited number of variables-has been understandably popular as it is vital to obtain detailed mechanistic insights. However, complex dynamical systems, like the human brain, cannot be properly understood by focusing on just one aspect at a time [2] [3] [4] . Human brain functioning includes enabling consciousness and cognition, generating emotions, and producing adaptive behavior, and it performs all of these functions while embedded in its biological and social (bio-social) environment [5] . To enable researchers to understand the complexity of human brain functioning in its bio-social context, the HBS provides a broad range of variables within a holistic approach.

Secondly, the brain's operations cannot be fully understood by single assessments obtained at a specific point in time, but require repeated measurements or continuous monitoring. Single-session assessments may be sufficient to uncover stable traits or processes. However, they do not capture changes in brain functioning that constitute a core feature of our plastic and adaptive brain [6, 7] . Similarly, the body and the social environment are subject to change. For example, seasonality is observed in affect [8, 9] , behavior [9, 10] , and biological [11] [12] [13] [14] and social [9] factors. Most of the studies mentioned were cross-sectional and explicitly stress the need for longitudinal studies that assess within-subject variation. Therefore, in the HBS, participants perform repeated assessments in three different seasons over one year starting at varying time points within a year. Thereby, we aim to reliably and validly capture changes in human brain operations that may be related not only to seasonality, but also to relevant life events and incidental or dynamic changes in biological factors (e.g., inflammation markers), social factors (e.g., household composition, work relations, friendships, politics, media exposure, lockdown), and environmental factors (e.g., daylight hours, exposure to chemicals).

Thirdly, group averages are critical in revealing general principles, but they gloss over differences that make us individual human beings. The human brain is arguably the most individual organ we have and is shaped by our experiences throughout life. Therefore, a large and rich sample is required before single subject inferences can be made about underlying principles of diversity in cognition, affect, and behavior [15, 16] . Given this, the HBS aims to include a broad range of repeated assessments of 1,000 participants.

Fourthly, laboratory assessments enable well-controlled analyses, but they may show low ecological validity in generalizing cognition, affect, and behavior to real-world settings. To understand cognition, affect, and behavior more comprehensively, there is a need for assessments both in the laboratory as well as in the real world [17, 18] . In the HBS, we perform a real-world assessment of physical activity, stress, and sleep with validated wearable devices. Furthermore, we apply ecological momentary assessments using a smartphone application. Taken together, these assessments enable us to understand cognition, affect, and behavior in the context where they naturally occur.

Finally, a healthy volunteer selection bias is a frequent problem in both cohort studies and neuroscience studies. For example, UK Biobank participants were more likely to be female, have a healthy lifestyle, and live in less socioeconomically deprived areas compared to the general population [19] . Also, students, the usual participants in cognitive neuroscience studies, function well, are often relatively healthy and have a high socioeconomic status [20] . Also, most population-based cohorts and large-scale studies include either developing populations [21] [22] [23] or advanced aging populations [24] [25] [26] [27] . Therefore, the HBS includes a broad population-based sample of individuals who are 30-39 years old that reflects the general population in terms of gender and educational attainment. The age range was chosen to represent adults beyond the age of developmental brain changes and before the onset of brain changes due to

The HBS aims to include 1,000 participants (500 men and 500 women) from the Nijmegen region (� 15 km) of whom 220 have a low, 340 a middle, and 430 a high level of education. Nijmegen is a medium-sized city in the east of the Netherlands with 176,731 citizens on the 1 st of January 2019 of whom 74% are native Dutch, which is comparable to the overall proportion of native Dutch citizens of the Netherlands (76%) [30] . In contrast, large cities (> 500,000 citizens) in the west of the Netherlands like Amsterdam, Rotterdam, and The Hague have respectively 46%, 48%, 45% native Dutch citizens [30] . Regarding educational attainment, 22% of Nijmegen citizens are primary and secondary educated (low level), 34% are primary, secondary, and vocationally educated (middle level), and 43% of the population have also a university degree (high level). Nijmegen has less citizens with low and middle level of education and more citizens with high level of education compared to the overall proportions of Dutch citizens (28%, 41%, 30% of citizens have respectively low, middle, and high level of education) [30] . In comparison, some large cities in the Netherlands have a higher proportion of citizens with a high level of education (e.g., Amsterdam 48%, Utrecht 52%), while other large cities have a higher proportion of citizens with a low level of education (e.g., Rotterdam 32%, The Hague 31%) [30] .

Inclusion criteria are age 30-39 years, living in the Nijmegen region (� 15km; because of feasibility), willingness, and ability to follow the study protocol. Exclusion criteria are: not speaking, reading, and/or understanding the Dutch language (minimum B1 level), a prior history of significant psychiatric or neurological illness (self-report), a current disease that affects the brain, a current medication that is therapeutically targeted at the brain (e.g., antidepressants, methylphenidate), pregnancy, contra-indication for MRI (metal or devices in the upper body (cardiac pacemaker, cochlear implant, aneurism clip), previous brain surgery, moderate to severe claustrophobia), contra-indication for the submaximal Åstrand cycle test (current use of beta-blockers, a current disease that hinders physical exercise), contra-indication for the cold pressor test (Raynaud's phenomenon, chronic pain syndrome in shoulder or arm, open wounds on arm or hand, scleroderma, arteriovenous fistula or shunt, presence of (unstable) angina pectoris).

We aim to acquire full longitudinal datasets of 1,000 participants. We expect a withdrawal rate of 15%, and will therefore recruit 1,150 individuals to participate in the study. We apply different strategies to recruit participants. Firstly, municipalities, general practitioners, and employers of different sectors based in the Nijmegen region send the HBS invitation and research flyer to their citizens, clients, and employees, respectively. Employers are asked to sponsor the study by (partly) exempting their employees from three working days which allows them to participate in three lab visits. Employees remain entirely free to decide whether or not they want to participate. Also, campaigns to increase awareness of the HBS have been launched.

Potential participants fill out contact details in an online form on the website https://www. healthybrainstudy.nl and receive the study brochure. Participants can watch short videos on the website that explain the various tests and assessments or learn about the experiences of an HBS participant. Participants are contacted via phone and invited to a face-to-face information meeting on the Radboud campus. Participants provide written informed consent at this meeting before participation.

The Institutional Review Board of Radboud University Medical Center approved the HBS on the 23 rd of May, 2019 (reference number: 2018-4894) in accordance with the latest revision of the Declaration of Helsinki [31] . Incidental findings could occur both while conducting the study (e.g., observed during assessments) and while using the data and biosamples in the future to answer research questions. If a researcher or research assistant notices a potential finding incidentally, he/she will contact the principal investigator, who approaches an incidental findings committee. At the Radboud Campus, such committees exist for neuroimaging and genetics. For other findings, the principal investigator contacts a medical doctor with relevant expertise. If, according to the committee or medical expert, no clinically relevant finding is identified, the participant remains uninformed. In all other cases, the participant's general practitioner is sent a letter describing the findings. At the same time, the participant receives a request to contact their general practitioner. Participants must consent to this procedure and provide the contact details of their general practitioner, otherwise, they are not allowed to participate.

A participant panel consisting of twelve people (age 30-39, 6 women and 6 men) was set up to aid in the design of the study. The panel advises on communication materials and incentives. For example, the panel gives feedback on the website, study information, posters, and flyers. Moreover, the first 243 participants filled out a questionnaire on their experience of the first lab visit, which provided us with feedback on the study procedures and on keeping participants involved. For example, we developed an online dashboard, because participants indicated that they would prefer more individual feedback on results. Participants receive gadgets after each assessment, and we organize (online) participant events. After completion of the study protocol, participants receive €150 with a maximal addition of €50 for assessment specific incentives.

Besides, a citizen science platform is used to involve participants as well as other citizens in generating research topics and questions that can be investigated with the HBS resource [32].

We use Ldot [33], which is a web application that only stores personal and logistical data, for communication with our participants. For data acquisition, we use Castor EDC [34] to provide electronic case report forms and online questionnaires. In addition, a smartphone application for ecological momentary assessments was developed. After participants have performed the real-world assessments, our data managers extract the raw data that is stored locally on the device. Bio-samples are stored at the Radboud Biobank with their sample tracking system, sample processing SOPs, and standardized sample storage conditions being employed [35] . Furthermore, a Polymorphic Encryption and Pseudonymization (PEP) infrastructure was developed for the HBS to protect all data streams and the privacy of participants [36, 37] ( Fig  1) . Ldot, Castor EDC, the smartphone application, and PEP meet the requirements of the European General Data Protection Regulation.

For each participant, the PEP-system generates unique pseudonyms for the different assessments to avoid the coupling of data to an individual participant during the data collection phase (step 1: collect). A backup of the data is stored locally (step 2: produce) and a copy is encrypted and transferred to the data repository (step 3: store). In the same step, the data are cryptographically pseudonymized. The data can only be decrypted in the processing environment where scientific analyses are performed (step 4: process). The PEP method ensures that different datasets obtained from the repository cannot be linked easily by different research projects because pseudonyms identifying a single participant are personalized at the project level, and data transfer can be minimized based on researchers' requirements. Derived data, produced by researchers, can be stored in the data repository (step 5: contribute) for future use by other researchers using their researcher-specific pseudonyms. The PEP-system was created to deal with the rigidity of the traditional encryption/decryption process by using polymorphic encryption. PEP ensures that there is no need to a priori fix the encryption key for the data. The PEP system enables different research teams to have access to the entire dataset or only a subset (of participants and variables) of the data source with a specific, personalized decryption key. Due to its additional security, the PEP system is an ideal approach to store, manage, and share sensitive personal data in a research data repository that reduces the risk of a participant's privacy being violated.

The following paragraphs describe the measures briefly, while the supplementary information provides detailed descriptions (S1 File). Each assessment starts with pre-visit online questionnaires, followed by a burst week of real-world assessments, followed by a whole day lab visit, which in turn is followed by post-visit online questionnaires and assessments (Fig 2) . Only those constructs that may be sensitive to change during one year (states) are repeated during the second and third assessments. The stable (trait) measures are equally distributed over the three assessments. The majority of measures are validated in prior research.

Participants fill out questionnaires before the start of the burst week to assess baseline characteristics. The questionnaires cover general demographic questions and questions about lifestyle and well-being (Table 1) .

The burst week consists of a real-world assessment of physical activity, stress, and sleep using validated wearable devices ( Table 2 ) and ecological momentary assessments (EMA) using a smartphone application. The questionnaire for EMA covers mood, social company, online social interactions, context, control items, retrospection, anticipation, and substance use. In addition, participants perform the home collection of stool, urine, saliva, and diffusive sampling of chemicals using silicone wristbands during the burst week (Table 3) .

Each eight-hour lab visit includes bio-sampling (Table 3) , neuroimaging (Table 4) , physiological (Table 2) , cognitive (Table 5) , affective (Table 5) , behavioral (Table 5) , and sensory assessments (Table 6 ). To avoid systematic carry-over and fatigue effects, the order of assessments varies between and within participants except for fasting blood sampling and blood pressure at the start of the day. 

Participants fill out an online questionnaire assessing (mental) health, life events, social/relationships, work, politics, personality, and literacy after each lab visit (Table 7) . Also, participants perform several online assessments about decision-making, narrative reading, and solidarity (Table 8 ). After their third and final lab visit, participants are invited to complete the 'Individual Differences in Language Skills' test battery (Table 9 ) assessing participants' linguistic knowledge, as well as linguistic processing and general cognitive skills.

From March until July 2020, when the assessment of participants was not allowed due to the COVID-19 measures, the included participants at that point (N = 158) received a monthly questionnaire addressing behavior and worries regarding COVID- 19 , and sleep quality [47] were assessed. We used the same questionnaires as we use in the three repeated assessments (Tables 1 and 7) . At the end of June 2021, the HBS included 418 participants. Seventeen-one participants (17%) withdrew from the study so far, mostly because they experienced too much burden (n = 41; 58%), got pregnant (n = 11; 15%), or had been given a diagnosis or medication treatment (n = 8; 11%). Most participants withdrew after the first assessment. To date, participants performed 755 lab visits: 380 participants carried out the first assessment, 237 participants the second assessment, and 138 participants the third assessment completing the entire study protocol. High-resolution T2 � w scan Quantitative T2 � and magnetic susceptibility mapping for identification and quantification of iron deposition across the brain 10 x [76] https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260952.t004 The COVID-19 pandemic interrupted the data acquisition phase. At that point, the HBS included 158 participants. Due to the lockdown, we canceled all assessments involving physical interaction as of the 16 th of March, 2020. The HBS resumed participant assessments on the 15 th of July, 2020 in compliance with the directives in force in the Netherlands. As a result, some participants (48%) have more than four months between repeated assessments. Besides, some participants (10%) have a delay between the burst week with real-world assessments and the lab visit at the Radboud campus. � Participants fill out their job characteristics at the first assessment. In the second and third assessments, they fill out their job characteristics only in case of a new job.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260952.t007 

This paper presents the design of the currently ongoing HBS, which will result in a unique and accessible resource for the scientific community and its public and private partners. Data are collected through cognitive, affective, behavioral, and physiological testing, neuroimaging, bio-sampling, questionnaires, ecological momentary assessment, and real-world assessment using wearable devices. We believe that the HBS complements other studies-small and large-, which together enable the scientific community to take the next step in understanding the human brain and how it dynamically and individually operates in its bio-social context. Here, we present examples of research opportunities including citizen science, reflect on the HBS 

Picture naming Word production 7 [133] Rapid automatized naming Word production 7

Verbal fluency Word production 5 [145] Antonym production Word production 5 [146] Maximal speech rate Word production 3

Phrase generation Sentence production 10

Sentence generation (active/passive sentence formulation)

Sentence generation (event apprehension) Sentence production 10

Spontaneous speech Sentence production 4 [147] Non-Word monitoring in non-word lists in noise Word comprehension 10 design choices and study population, and discuss our data security system which enables future data sharing.

The HBS resource will be used to address expert and citizen-driven research questions that usually pertain to complex interactions between multiple factors. The first example of an expert-driven research question pertains to the association between income and positive affect. It was found among US residents that higher income was associated with more happiness and enjoyment, and less sadness and worry, but only up to a point ($75.000 per year), above that, there was no relationship between income and emotional well-being [151] . The HBS resource can help explain the interplay between affect, social and biological data, and income. A second example of a complex interaction is that sedentary behavior is associated with poor health and higher mortality [152, 153] . Merely standing up from time to time, e.g., to walk around a bit protects against part of this health risk [154] . Existing research on this topic has mainly focused on the consequences of prolonged sitting and has overlooked the key question of why people choose to stand up (when they sit) or sit down (when they stand), in the first place. In other words, what psychological processes (e.g., related to effort, reward, affect, and fatigue) are associated with healthy and unhealthy sedentary behavior? Answering this question will pave the way for the development of novel, targeted interventions that will improve (occupational) health [155] .

The HBS resource will also be used for citizen science. Different forms of citizen science exist. Projects can be led by experts, community-led, or co-created with different aims and levels of participation [156] . HBS participants and other citizens generate research questions to be answered with the HBS resource. In traditional designs, scientists test hypotheses that are 

often based on previous findings within their research domain or their intuitions. However, people living in or with specific conditions (i.e., being in their thirties and going through a key life event) may have additional insight on top of existing expert-knowledge. These insights are uncovered by a citizen science platform. The essence of the platform is to leverage collective intelligence from a large group of participants versus a smaller number of experts. This can reveal topics and research questions that have a significant influence on people's behavior in the real world and their health status, which experts may have left untouched [157] [158] [159] [160] . By giving citizens a voice in scientific research, it can contribute considerably to the valorization of research results.

Comprehension of complex interactions as illustrated above requires an interdisciplinary, team science approach [29] . The HBS design is the result of an orchestrated cross-campus process over 22 months in which 250 scientists from all classical faculties were involved and were challenged to look past the horizons of their disciplines in a few plenary meetings and several smaller working groups, all providing input to a multidisciplinary scientific board that made the final design decisions. Here, we reflect on our design choices and the study population selected.

First of all, to capture the complexity of the human brain and its environment, a large set of measures was provided. We sought a balance between comprehensiveness, local expertise, costs, and burden for the participants. This resulted in an extensive number, variety, duration of mostly validated assessments, albeit not perfectly comprehensive. For example, the neuroimaging protocol is largely aligned with the Human Connectome Project [161] and UK Biobank [162] brain imaging, but includes a movie fMRI scan that is not included in the Human Connectome Project and UK Biobank, while the latter include scans that are not included in the HBS. Furthermore, instead of continuous monitoring over one year with validated wearable devices, the HBS covers three times a burst week of real-world assessments. Also, the collection of GPS data, financial transactions, and social media interactions were not allowed due to legal restrictions and privacy concerns.

Secondly, the HBS includes three repeated assessments for about one year. These repetitions aim to capture changes in human brain operations that may be related to relevant life events, seasonality, and/or incidental or dynamic changes in the biological and social environment. Regarding seasonality, the HBS participants start at varying time points within a year, so, although we sample only three instead of four times over one year, across participants we sample seasonal transitions in a fine-grained manner.

Thirdly, the HBS aims to include 1,000 participants. Due to differences in measurementspecific signal-to-noise properties, it is not possible to provide a straightforward power and sample size calculation because the data enables analyses of various cognitive, affective, and behavioral interactions in their bio-social context. To decide on the number of participants, we sought a balance between sensitivity and feasibility. The chosen number of participants is high compared to traditional neuroscientific experiments revealing general principles but is low compared to disease risk-oriented cohorts (which is not the aim of the HBS) like the UK Biobank [26], the Rotterdam Study [24], or the Rhineland Study [25] . However, the number is comparable to other studies designed to capture inter-individual differences like the Human Connectome Project, which included 1,200 young healthy adults [161] , or the Personalized Parkinson Project, which included 650 patients [163] . We consider the number large given the comprehensive range of repeated measures both in the laboratory as in the real world.

Fourthly, we believe that assessing real-world events with wearable devices is more objective than scales and questionnaires. When we designed the study in 2017, hardly any longitudinal study included wearable devices. As the field of wearable technology has developed rapidly, in the meantime, several longitudinal studies have added wearable devices to their data collection methods. For example, subsets of UK Biobank participants and Rotterdam Study participants wore an accelerometer [164, 165] . We would like to stress that including real-world assessments is one of the five strengths of the HBS, so it is not unique by itself. In particular, the HBS includes repeated assessments with wearable devices in three different seasons over one year starting at varying time points within a year. When we designed the study, to our knowledge, this was unique for HBS. In the meantime, a subset of UK Biobank participants is performing seasonal repeats with a wearable device [166] . Furthermore, the HBS combines physiological recordings with wearable devices with ecological momentary assessments using a smartphone application. We consider the additional collection of momentary assessments of mood and behavior and context information innovative.

Fifthly, we developed a recruitment strategy targeted at a sample that represents the 30-39-year-old population of Nijmegen and its surroundings in terms of gender and educational attainment. However, a reasonable level of reading, speaking, and understanding Dutch (B1 level) is required to be able to complete the study protocol, e.g., to fill out questionnaires. This implies that the HBS participants do not fully represent the Nijmegen population at large, because in this example the illiterate, people with low literacy, or non-Dutch speaking individuals are excluded. However, the aim of including 220 participants with a low, 340 with a middle, and 430 with a high level of education enables the study of interacting social factors.

The HBS resource will be accessible to the scientific community at large. The resource contains sensitive personal data that needs to be protected from unauthorized access and unintentional disclosure. The sharing of (big) data within the scientific community is necessary for progress and maximizes scientific benefits derived from valuable and costly data. The HBS data is protected by a digital security system, a Polymorphic Encryption and Pseudonymization (PEP) infrastructure [36] , which allows the sharing of data with researchers worldwide while safeguarding participants' privacy in line with the European General Data Protection Regulation. The digital security system is based on a multi-point, privacy-by-design strategy: (a) participants provide informed consent, also for the important element of data sharing; (b) signed contractual agreements with researchers are in place to ensure that no attempts towards depseudonymization, linking or commercialization of the raw data will be attempted; (c) governance policies limit access to the data to qualified researchers only; (d) an innovative pseudonymization and encryption process is applied [37] .

An access procedure is in place and published on https://www.healthybrainstudy.nl/en/ data-and-methods/access. We stratify researchers into three tiers with different rights. Tier I consists of researchers from the Radboud campus that contributed to study design or data acquisition. Tier II consists of all other researchers from the Radboud campus. Tier III consists of publicly financed researchers from other academic institutions. Companies can apply in all tiers, but they cannot apply independently. Application for data starts with the submission of a data request for a project that has been preregistered, e.g., in the Open Science Framework. Then, the HBS scientific board reviews the application. After approval, the researcher signs a data/material transfer agreement. Next, the researcher receives data and/or samples. The Radboud Biobank provides the samples [35] . All processed data and samples with relevant documentation (including scripts and data and/or samples processing protocols) must be integrated back into the HBS resource so that it can be used by others. Finally, the researcher publishes the results by acknowledging the HBS consortium.

The HBS has been designed using a team science approach to integrate scientific disciplines and is characterized by a broad range of repeated assessments, a large number of participants, both laboratory and real-world assessments, and a population-based sample. Moreover, data is managed to allow data sharing with scientists worldwide while maintaining participants' privacy. With the HBS resource, the scientific community can take the next step in understanding the human brain and how it dynamically and individually operates in its bio-social context.

The HBS consortium consists of: 

Understanding, protecting, and developing global brain resources

The anticipating brain is not a scientist: the free-energy principle from an ecological-enactive perspective

The embodied brain: towards a radical embodied cognitive neuroscience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again

The brain has a body: adaptive behavior emerges from interactions of nervous system, body and environment

Stressrelated noradrenergic activity prompts large-scale neural network reconfiguration

Cerebral changes improved by physical activity during cognitive decline: A systematic review on MRI studies

Seasonality of depressive symptoms in women but not in men: A cross-sectional study in the UK Biobank cohort

Self-attributed seasonality of mood and behavior: a report from the Netherlands study of depression and anxiety

Seasonality of physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep in a middle-aged and elderly population: The Rotterdam study

The CIRCORT database: Reference ranges and seasonal changes in diurnal salivary cortisol derived from a meta-dataset comprised of 15 field studies

Seasonal variation in human gut microbiome composition

Seasonal variation in serum cholesterol levels: treatment implications and possible mechanisms

Seasonality of cardiovascular risk factors: an analysis including over 230 000 participants in 15 countries

Inter-individual differences in human brain structure and morphology link to variation in demographics and behavior. eLife

A positive-negative mode of population covariation links brain connectivity, demographics and behavior

Experience sampling methodology in mental health research: new insights and technical developments

Studying the neurobiology of human social interaction: Making the case for ecological validity

Comparison of sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of UK Biobank participants with those of the general population

The long-term stability of the human gut microbiota

Dietary mineral intake and risk of mild cognitive impairment: the PATH through life project

HPA axis activation by a socially evaluated cold-pressor test

Hair cortisol analysis: A promising biomarker of HPA activation in older adults

Silicone wristband passive samplers yield highly individualized pesticide residue exposure profiles

Silicone wristbands as personal passive samplers

The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project

The ARSQ 2.0 reveals age and personality effects on mind-wandering experiences

MP2RAGE, a self bias-field corrected sequence for improved segmentation and T1-mapping at high field. Neuroimage

Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) as a means to measure brain iron? A post mortem validation study. Neuroimage

Learning the opportunity cost of time in a patch-foraging task

Adaptive history biases result from confidence-weighted accumulation of past choices

Effective reinforcement learning following cerebellar damage requires a balance between exploration and motor noise

Preserved hippocampus activation in normal aging as revealed by fMRI

Planning or something else? Examining neuropsychological predictors of Zoo Map performance

Initial and sustained brain responses to contextual conditioned anxiety in humans

Psychometric characteristics of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support

Work-home interaction from a work psychological perspective: Development and validation of a new questionnaire, the SWING

The assessment of commitment: Advantages of a unidimensional, target-free approach

Development and validation of the short-form employability five-factor instrument

Professional expertise of higher level employees; age stereotyping in self-assessments and supervisor ratings

0: Update van de standaard voor vragenlijstonderzoek naar werk, welbevinden en prestaties

Efficacy, trust, and political behavior: an attempt to resolve a lingering conceptual dilemma

An ever wider gap in an ever closer union: Rising inequalities and euroscepticism in 12 West European democracies

The revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R)

Sensory processing sensitivity: a review in the light of the evolution of biological responsivity

Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale

High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success

Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale

Dispositional greed

The dirty dozen: a concise measure of the dark triad

Some determinants of the socially responsible investment decision: A cross-country study

Development and testing of an abbreviated numeracy scale: A rasch analysis approach

Assessing financial literacy in 12 countries: an OECD/INFE international pilot exercise

Graph literacy: A cross-cultural comparison

Cultural intelligence: A theorybased, short form measure2015

Higher order risk attitudes, demographics, and financial decisions. The Review of Economic Studies

The geometry of distributional preferences and a non-parametric identification approach: The Equality Equivalence Test

Ambiguity attitudes in a large representative sample

Social preferences in the online laboratory: a randomized experiment

The behavioral validity of the strategy method in public good experiments

Global evidence on economic preferences

Exploring absorbing reading experiences: Developing and validating a self-report scale to measure story world absorption

Probing the character of norms: A factorial survey analysis of the norms of political action

How inter-firm co-operation depends on social embeddedness: A vignette study

Shared lexical access processes in speaking and listening? An individual differences study

The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition

Interrelations of age, health, and speed

A free, easy-to-use, computer-based simple and four-choice reaction time programme: the Deary-Liewald reaction time task

Individual differences in frequency and saliency of speech-accompanying gestures: the role of cognitive abilities and empathy

The Corsi block-tapping task: methodological and theoretical considerations

Raven manual section 4: advanced progressive matrices

Circle Pines: American Guidance Service

Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test Dutch-III-NL. Amsterdam, NL: Harcourt Assessment BV

Dutch Author Recognition Test

How the brain processes violations of the grammatical norm: An fMRI study

What do verbal fluency tasks measure? Predictors of verbal fluency performance in older adults

Vocabulary knowledge predicts lexical processing: Evidence from a group of participants with diverse educational backgrounds

Vocabulary size influences spontaneous speech in native language users: validating the use of automatic speech recognition in individual differences research

Individual differences in working memory and processing speed predict anticipatory spoken language processing in the visual world. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference

Predictors of verb-mediated anticipatory eye movements in the visual world

High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being

Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women. The Lancet

Patterns of sedentary behavior and mortality in U.S. middle-aged and older adults: a national cohort study

Temporal dynamics of sitting behavior at work

Citizen science for public health

Crowdsourcing novel childhood predictors of adult obesity

Crowdsourcing predictors of behavioral outcomes

Crowdsourcing in health and medical research: a systematic review

Design thinking inspired crowdsourcing: Toward a generative model of complex problem solving

The Human Connectome Project: a data acquisition perspective

Multimodal population brain imaging in the UK Biobank prospective epidemiological study

The Personalized Parkinson Project: examining disease progression through broad biomarkers in early Parkinson's disease

Large scale population assessment of physical activity using wrist worn accelerometers: The UK Biobank Study

Objective measures of activity in the elderly: Distribution and associations with demographic and health factors