key: cord-0921842-sjmlhaj0 authors: Wang, E.; Mei, Wei; Shang, You; Zhang, Changsheng; Yang, Lujia; Ma, Yulong; Chen, Yan; Huang, Jiapeng; Zhu, Tao; Mi, Weidong title: Chinese Association of Anesthesiologists Expert Consensus on the Use of Perioperative Ultrasound in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients date: 2020-04-10 journal: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.04.002 sha: cc9f5fe64f467e7811400acc9942b04e77e38601 doc_id: 921842 cord_uid: sjmlhaj0 The COVID-19 pandemic is spreading globally. COVID-19 has an effect on the systemic state, cardiopulmonary function and primary disease of patients undergoing surgery. COVID-19's high contagiousness makes anesthesia and intraoperative management more difficult. This expert consensus aims to comprehensively introduce the application of perioperative ultrasound in COVID-19 patients, including pulmonary ultrasound and anesthesia management, ultrasound and airway management, ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia and echocardiography for COVID-19 patients. Perioperative ultrasound has been widely used in the field of anesthesiology due to its simplicity, rapidity, practicality, low cost, absence of radiation and reproducibility. Point of care ultrasound has become an indispensable tool for anesthesiologists to evaluate cardiopulmonary status, guide procedures and manage emergencies. 1, 2 Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a public health emergency of international concerns 3 All providers should practice meticulous precautions against COVID-19 infections during performance of perioperative ultrasound. The ultrasound equipment, including an ultrasound transducer, should be protected from contamination using plastic covers and disinfected routinely and systemically. In recent years, lung ultrasound has gradually gained popularity in anesthesia practices. 4 COVID-19 patients suffered from severe lung injuries, and the pathological changes included bronchiolitis and alveolitis, which were accompanied by epithelial cell proliferation, atrophy and exfoliation. 5 In addition, extensive pulmonary interstitial fibrosis, hemorrhagic pulmonary embolism and massive inflammatory cell infiltration were also observed. 5 The average diameter of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is about 120nm, so it is speculated that the virus particles can be inhaled into the airway and lungs, even into the alveoli. This may explain why the lesions of SARS-CoV-2 viral pneumonia are mainly in the subpleural areas. Because COVID-19 generally begins in the terminal alveoli, which are close to the pleura, pathologies can be clearly observed by lung ultrasound. 6 In addition, strict infection control requirements for COVID-19 patients make transport to radiology suites complex and carry high risks of severe hypoxemia. Lung ultrasound has become an important diagnostic tool to rapidly assess of the severity of SARS-CoV2 pneumonia/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) at presentation, to track the progression of disease, to monitor lung recruitment maneuvers, to evaluate responses to prone position, to guide and manage extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy, and to make decisions related to weaning the patient from ventilatory support. 7 In general, the convex array probe is the probe of choice, while the high-frequency linear array probe is appropriate to monitor pleural or subpleural lesions. Patients are usually examined in the supine position, with the probe perpendicular to the ribs. The anterior axillary line and the posterior axillary line divides the lung of each side into three areas, the anterior, the lateral and the posterior area. Each area is further divided into two regions by the nipple line, the upper region and the lower region. All 12 lung areas should be examined comprehensively. It should be noted that there may be a blind spot in the posterior areas due to the shadowing from the scapula. The characteristics of lung ultrasound in COVID-19 patients might vary significantly from patient to patient or from day to day due to different stages of the disease, the severity of the lung lesions, secondary lung lesions caused by dysfunction of other organs, iatrogenic lung lesions, and pre-existed cardiopulmonary diseases. The predominant pattern is of varying degrees of interstitial syndrome and alveolar consolidation, the degree of which is correlated with the severity of the lung injury. COVID-19 lung lesions usually involved the subpleural area, thus abnormalities could be identified easily on lung ultrasound. 6 In rare cases, the lung lesions only affect deep lung tissues and could not be diagnosed by lung ultrasound and chest CT should be reserved for these cases when ultrasonography cannot answer the clinical question. The ultrasonic manifestations of the lung lesions in COVID-19 patients are 6,7 : 1. thickening of the pleural line with pleural line irregularity; 2. B lines in a variety of patterns including focal, multi focal, and confluent; 3. consolidations in a variety of patterns including multifocal small, non-translobar, and translobar with occasional mobile air bronchograms; 4. appearance of A lines during recovery phase; 5. pleural effusions are uncommon. (Figure 1 ) The observed patterns occurred across a continuum from mild alveolar interstitial pattern, to severe bilateral interstitial pattern, to lung consolidation. 6, 7 Lesions are mostly located in the posterior fields of both lungs. Multiple discontinuous or continuous fused B lines (waterfall sign) under the pleural line were visible or diffused B lines (white lung sign), and the A lines disappeared. Compared with the B lines caused by cardiogenic pulmonary edema, the B lines here were more likely to be fused and fixed. 8 The B lines had blurred edges and no bifurcation signs. The origination point of the subpleural lesion was more obtuse (convex array probe) compared with that of B lines of pulmonary edema. High frequency ultrasound could further show that the pleural line was unsmooth, rough, and interrupted mainly due to the decreased gas content and sound wave reflection in the subpleural alveoli and interstitial lesions. Multiple small patchy consolidations were observed in the subpleural lesion, and strip consolidation. The echogenicity in the lesions was homogeneous or inhomogeneous, and air bronchogram sign was visible (mostly early and progressive stages because secondary pulmonary lobules were involved by interstitial inflammation, the interstitial tissues were thickened and swollen, some bronchioles and alveoli were not involved by high gas content) or air bronchogram sign (visible in severe cases or local consolidation, possibly because local inflammation storm caused the consolidation and edema of most bronchioles and alveoli, and only large bronchi and part of the alveoli were not involved. When symptoms improve, ultrasound showed irregular nodule subpleural echo shadow, with fused B lines in fixed position, localized pleural thickening and local pleural effusion around the subpleural lesion. 6 In patients with pneumothorax, the pleural sliding sign will disappear, and the lung point sign will be present. 9 CDFI ultrasound showed low blood flow signals in subpleural consolidation, possibly due to the pathological nature and progression of lesions in COVID-19. This is in contrast to pulmonary consolidation caused by common inflammation which generally shows abundant blood flow signals. 6 10 In addition, lung ultrasound is useful to identify patients at high risk for hypoxemia and atelectasis during and after surgery. [11] [12] [13] For these patients, restrictive fluid management, low tidal volume (