key: cord-0918092-tkgyg377
authors: nan
title: A future vaccination campaign against COVID-19 at risk of vaccine hesitancy and politicisation
date: 2020-05-20
journal: Lancet Infect Dis
DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30426-6
sha: 3aa166b2abf03c8d534335ab10e59de3b39e05ae
doc_id: 918092
cord_uid: tkgyg377

nan

Just a few weeks ago, more than half of the world's population was on lockdown to limit the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

Scientists are racing against time to provide a proven treatment. Beyond the current outbreak, in the longer term, the development of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 and their global access are a priority to end the pandemic. 1 However, the success of this strategy relies on people's acceptability of immunisation: what if people do not want the shot? This question is not rhetorical; many experts have warned against a worldwide decline in public trust in immunisation and the rise of vaccine hesitancy during the past decade, especially in whole Europe and in France. 2, 3 Early results from a survey done in late March in France suggests that this distrust is likely to become an issue when the vaccine will be made available.

We did an online survey in a representative sample of the French population aged 18 years and older 10 days after the nationwide lockdown was introduced (March 27-29). We found that 26% of respondents stated that, if a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 becomes available, they would not use it. It might come as a surprise given the situation a few weeks ago: the whole population was confined as the outbreak had not yet reached its peak, and media were flooded with daily death tolls and the saturation of intensive care wards. The social profile of reluctant responders is even more worrying: this attitude was more prevalent among low-income people (37%), who are generally more exposed to infectious diseases, 4 among young women (aged 18-35 years; 36%), who play a crucial role regarding childhood vaccination, 5 and among people aged older than 75 years (22%), who are probably at an increased risk for severe illness from COVID-19. Our data also suggest that the political views of respondents play an important part in their attitude. Participants' acceptation of a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 strongly depended on their vote at the first round of the 2017 presidential election (figure): those who had voted for a far left or far right candidate were much more likely to state that they would refuse the vaccine, as well as those who abtained from voting.

These early results are not entirely surprising. When this dimension has been studied, researchers have often found a connection between political beliefs and attitudes to vaccines. 6 They highlight a crucial issue for public health interventions: how can we assure the public that recommendations reflect the state of scientific knowledge rather than political interests? This problem is exacerbated in times of crisis, during which there is considerable scientific uncertainty, available measures have a limited effect, and politicians-rather than experts-are the public face of crisis management. This is one of the lessons that can be drawn from the H1N1 influenza pandemic of 2009 in France. As the pandemic unfolded, the apparent national unity of the early phase broke apart. Criticism of the government's strategy was voiced by prominent members of nearly all of the opposition parties. 7 A public debate around the safety of the vaccine arose, with prominent politicians and activists claiming that it had been produced too hastily and not been tested enough. This was crucial in the failure of the vaccination campaign (only 8% of the population was vaccinated). 8 It also ushered in an era of perpetual debate over vaccination in France. 9 One of the crucial mistakes made at the time by French authorities was to refuse to communicate early on the measures taken to ensure the safety of the vaccine for fear that the mere evocation of risk might provoke irrational reactions. This approach let critics set the agenda on this issue, condemning public authorities to a defensive position.

Public authorities are setting up fast-track approval processes for a putative vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. 9 It is crucial to communicate early and transparently on these processes to avoid vaccines becoming part of political debates.

We declare no competing interests. 

CNRS, CREM UMR 6211

Ensuring global access to COVID-19 vaccines

Experts concerned about vaccination backlash

The state of vaccine confidence 2016: global insights through a 67-country survey

Disability weights for infectious diseases in four European countries: comparison between countries and across respondent characteristics

I think I made the right decision … I hope I'm not wrong'. Vaccine hesitancy, commitment and trust among parents of young children

Populist politics and vaccine hesitancy in Western Europe: an analysis of national-level data

Rethinking the antivaccine movement concept: a case study of public criticism of the swine flu vaccine's safety in France

The 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccination in France: who accepted to receive the vaccine and why?

Vaccine hesitancy and coercion: all eyes on France

Informer sans inquiéter: rationalité et irrationalité du public dans la communication sur la grippe A