key: cord-0917717-thqn1q3u authors: Castro, Rodolfo; Ribeiro-Alves, Marcelo; Oliveira, Cátia; Romero, Carmen Phang; Perazzo, Hugo; Simjanoski, Mario; Kapciznki, Flavio; Balanzá-Martínez, Vicent; De Boni, Raquel B. title: What Are We Measuring When We Evaluate Digital Interventions for Improving Lifestyle? A Scoping Meta-Review date: 2022-01-03 journal: Front Public Health DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.735624 sha: b47c7a0adbf7806ce87ebb26ac6b7f6911cf275c doc_id: 917717 cord_uid: thqn1q3u Background: Lifestyle Medicine (LM) aims to address six main behavioral domains: diet/nutrition, substance use (SU), physical activity (PA), social relationships, stress management, and sleep. Digital Health Interventions (DHIs) have been used to improve these domains. However, there is no consensus on how to measure lifestyle and its intermediate outcomes aside from measuring each behavior separately. We aimed to describe (1) the most frequent lifestyle domains addressed by DHIs, (2) the most frequent outcomes used to measure lifestyle changes, and (3) the most frequent DHI delivery methods. Methods: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-ScR) Extension for Scoping Reviews. A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science for publications since 2010. We included systematic reviews and meta-analyses of clinical trials using DHI to promote health, behavioral, or lifestyle change. Results: Overall, 954 records were identified, and 72 systematic reviews were included. Of those, 35 conducted meta-analyses, 58 addressed diet/nutrition, and 60 focused on PA. Only one systematic review evaluated all six lifestyle domains simultaneously; 1 systematic review evaluated five lifestyle domains; 5 systematic reviews evaluated 4 lifestyle domains; 14 systematic reviews evaluated 3 lifestyle domains; and the remaining 52 systematic reviews evaluated only one or two domains. The most frequently evaluated domains were diet/nutrition and PA. The most frequent DHI delivery methods were smartphone apps and websites. Discussion: The concept of lifestyle is still unclear and fragmented, making it hard to evaluate the complex interconnections of unhealthy behaviors, and their impact on health. Clarifying this concept, refining its operationalization, and defining the reporting guidelines should be considered as the current research priorities. DHIs have the potential to improve lifestyle at primary, secondary, and tertiary levels of prevention—but most of them are targeting clinical populations. Although important advances have been made to evaluate DHIs, some of their characteristics, such as the rate at which they become obsolete, will require innovative research designs to evaluate long-term outcomes in health. According to the latest Global Burden of Disease Study, the drivers of increased Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) from 1990 to 2019 include six health problems that mostly affect adults older than 50 years (such as ischemic heart disease and diabetes) and four that mostly affect individuals from 10 to 49 years (such as depressive disorders) (1) . In 2019, eight of the top 10 risk factors for death and disability were behavioral or metabolic problems [such as high systolic blood pressure, smoking, high fasting plasma glucose, high body-mass index, high low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and alcohol use] (2) . Such figures, in addition to the extensive literature on the matter (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) , emphasize the importance of addressing unhealthy behaviors to prevent morbidity and mortality. Lifestyle Medicine (LM) profits from evidence-based strategies to prevent and treat the progression of chronic diseases and improve quality of life (11) . As per the American College of Lifestyle Medicine (12) , the LM foundation is established over six main domains: diet, physical activity (PA), avoiding substance use (SU), sleep, social relationships, and stress management. Thus, LM aims toward a comprehensive change in unhealthy behaviors. Unhealthy behaviors tend to cluster and present an additive effect on decreased survival time without disability and earlier mortality (5, 8, 10, 13) . However, most epidemiological studies do not include all the lifestyle domains considered in LM when evaluating health outcomes. Instead, unhealthy behaviors have been considered as independent risk factors. The multidimensional evaluation of lifestyle is becoming more frequent, either by using lifestyle indexes (5, 10) or including multiple lifestyle domains and testing their interaction effects (9) . In this sense, our research group recently developed and validated a scale for the multidimensional evaluation of lifestyle (14) (15) (16) (17) . Digital health interventions (DHIs) may be understood as interventions delivered via digital technologies (such as apps, digital platforms, and wearables) to improve the health of individuals (18) (19) (20) (21) . DHIs have increasingly been used to promote behavior change and a healthier lifestyle. For instance, a study conducted in Australia (June 2018-July 2018) searched for digital apps, using the words "health" and "well-being" (in the Australian iTunes and Google Play), and retrieved 2,12,352 related apps (22) . In addition, DHIs have been advocated as a way to increase access to health, such as mental health (23) , due to their relatively low cost and ease of scalability. However, the debate on how DHIs must be evaluated to ensure their quality and efficacy is far from over (24, 25) . Due to the velocity and dynamic changes of DHIs, some argue that the gold standard of medical evaluation-randomized clinical trials (RCT)-would not be appropriate to DHIs assessment. Such velocity may also jeopardize the broader evaluation of effectiveness-which is usually made through systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Whenever there are multiple systematic reviews on the same topic it may be necessary to conduct a meta-review (i.e., the systematic review of systematic reviews) (26) . Moreover, if the field is highly heterogeneous and/or wide, scoping meta-reviews may be necessary to summarize concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. An important step in the advancement of DHI evaluation was the publication of the Evidence Standards Framework for Digital Health Technologies (27) , in the United Kingdom (UK). Although developed to "demonstrate (DHIs) value in the UK health and social care system, " it may be useful for guiding other countries, especially those presenting universal healthcare systems. Regarding digital interventions for preventing unhealthy lifestyles, the guideline recommends a minimum of high-quality observational or quasi-experimental studies demonstrating relevant outcomes. The determination of relevant outcomes in LM, however, is not simple. In 2017, a meta-review on DHIs for cardiometabolic events pointed to the heterogeneity in study measures, such as DHI modalities, populations, and outcomes. Such heterogeneity precluded the formation of strong conclusions regarding the effectiveness of the evaluated interventions (28) . In a meta-review evaluating the effect of DHIs on mental health, studies focusing on symptoms of anxiety or depression presented positive small/medium effect sizes (29) . However, mental health symptoms are also heterogeneous and may not always represent a clinical psychiatric diagnosis, which could jeopardize future attempts to reproduce the findings. Besides the outcomes, control groups also may represent a challenge. For instance, a meta-review evaluating DHIs for weight loss concluded that the interventions were more effective than minimal treatment but less effective than face-to-face interventions (30) . Also, it is possible that some lifestyle domains, such as PA and diet, are of greater interest for addressing and evaluating DHIs due to the easily measurable outcomes associated with these domains. This hypothesis may make it even harder to evaluate lifestyle as a multidimensional construct, since easily measurable outcomes may lead to an unbalance in the field, with higher representation of lifestyle domains from which there is more available evidence. Given the huge heterogeneity of DHIs and the specific challenges related to lifestyle research, in this article, we aimed to (1) identify the most frequent lifestyle domains evaluated (diet, PA, SU, sleep, social relationships, and stress management-as proposed by the American College of Lifestyle Medicine (12) , and most common combinations of them); (2) describe the most frequent outcomes used to measure lifestyle changes in each domain or in multidimensional evaluations; and (3) to identify the most frequent delivery methods. Answering these questions and revealing research gaps is a crucial step for designing, implementing, and evaluating DHI in order for these interventions to have clinical and public health relevance. The methodology followed Arksey and O'Malley's framework for scoping reviews (31) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) (32) . A scoping review is defined as a type of research synthesis that aims to map the literature on a particular topic or research area to identify key concepts, research gaps, and sources of evidence to inform practice, policymaking, and research. The review included the following key phases: (a) formulating a research question, (b) Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Study Design (PICOS) acronym and eligibility criteria definition (c) identifying relevant studies, (d) study selection, (e) data extraction, and (f) collating, summarizing, and reporting the results. The main research question was, "What are we measuring when we evaluate digital interventions for improving lifestyle?" Specifically, we aimed to answer the following questions: "What are the most frequent lifestyle domains addressed by DHI?, " "What are the most frequent outcomes used to measure lifestyle changes?, " and "What are the most frequent DHI delivery methods?" We included systematic reviews or meta-analyses of RCTs that assessed the effectiveness of DHI focusing on any of the lifestyle domains proposed by the American College of Lifestyle Medicine (i.e., diet, SU, PA, social relationships, sleep, and stress management). Those reviews had to include adults (equal or above 18 years) either from the general population, patients, or at-risk population. DHIs could be delivered by smartphone apps, computer or tablet, digital games, digital platforms, monitoring devices, social media, websites, SMS, and/or e-mail. There were no restrictions regarding the control group. Reviews were included if they were published after 2010 (following the widespread use of smartphones) and if published in English, Portuguese, Spanish, or French. Exclusion criteria were systematic reviews of observational or qualitative studies, study protocols, types of publications different from full articles, such as congress abstract, letters, or comments to the editor. Studies that include only children, adolescents, or pregnant women were excluded because outcomes evaluating the effectiveness of DHI may not be applied to adults (such as the growth curve or early childbirth). Studies including only interventions delivered by SMS were also excluded. The search was carried out in September 2020 and updated in October 2021 across four electronic databases: MEDLINE through PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Construction of the search strategy was written using controlled vocabulary terms, specific to the databases; main descriptors were: "lifestyle, " "e-health, " "m-health, " and other similar terms, such as "systematic review" and "clinical trials." Supplementary Material 1 presents the strategies for each bibliographic database. Additionally, the reference lists of the selected articles were manually scrutinized for other studies that could have been lost in the electronic search. After the removal of duplicated references, titles and abstracts were screened according to inclusion criteria. Full texts of articles meeting the inclusion criteria were retrieved and checked for their eligibility through complete reading. The process of screening citations and selecting articles was carried out independently by two reviewers, and the discrepancies were resolved by consensus or decided by a third researcher. A table containing the list of excluded studies along with the reasons for their exclusion was prepared (Supplementary Material 1). The Rayyan QCRI web application (https://rayyan.qcri.org/) (33) and Mendeley R were used to screen and manage the references, respectively; both are open-access. Data extraction was conducted independently by two reviewers using a pre-pilot spreadsheet in the Excel program. The developed spreadsheet was tested by the study team in a small sample of papers (n = 2) and calibrated before use. Discordances in the extracted data were resolved by consensus. Data extracted from each study are presented in Table 1 . The data were compiled into a single Excel 2010 spreadsheet for validation and coding. To avoid frequent issues related to papers using different terminology, before the analysis, all string data were reviewed. Synonyms were merged in unique terms decided by consensus with the reviewers. Descriptive statistics were performed analyzing the frequency of each lifestyle domain, the outcomes, and the delivery methods. In constructing the graphs, we used the software R v.4.0.5, the library Rgraphviz and its dependencies (34) . Overall, 953 records were identified by searching the databases, and 1 record was additionally found through the manual search. Title and abstract screenings resulted in 152 included systematic reviews or meta-analyses reporting on the effectiveness of DHIs focusing on one or more of the lifestyle domains evaluated (i.e., diet, SU, PA, social relationships, sleep, and stress management) among adults. A total of 72 studies were included after full-text assessment, of which 35 conducted meta-analyses (Figure 1 ). All of them were published in English. The systematic reviews included data ranging from a total of 2 (35) to 117 (36) RCTs. Overall, the sample size of the included RCTs ranged between 6 (37) and 69,219 (38) participants. Unfortunately, some systematic reviews did not report the size of the included RCTs. Most DHIs were compared to more than one alternative strategies. Table 2 shows the summary of systematic reviews included. Of the 72 included reviews, only one evaluated all six lifestyle domains (i.e., diet, PA, SU, social relationships, sleep, and stress management) (100) . In this study, the authors evaluated 14 webbased lifestyle programs designed to improve brain health among healthy individuals. A meta-analysis was performed including three RCTs. It showed a small-to-medium positive effect but high heterogeneity. One systematic review evaluated five lifestyle domains (diet, PA, SU, social relationships, and sleep) (93) . The effects of eHealth cardiac rehabilitation on health outcomes were evaluated in 15 trials, and meta-analyses were performed with data from 11 studies. Results indicated that interventions were effective in engaging patients into an active lifestyle, improving quality of life (QoL), and decreasing re-hospitalization. The authors also highlighted that empowerment components and tele-monitoring were crucial to the success of the interventions. Five systematic reviews evaluated 4 lifestyle domains (59, 62, (74) (75) (76) : all of them evaluated PA and stress management, 4 evaluated diet, 3 evaluated SU, 2 evaluated social relationships, and 1 evaluated restorative sleep. Most of the studies (n = 4) were related to cardiovascular disease (CVD), and 3 of them performed meta-analyses (59, 62, 76) . All meta-analyses showed that DHIs are promising methods for managing CVDs. Fourteen systematic reviews evaluated 3 lifestyle domains and all of them included diet and PA. Nine evaluated SU, 3 evaluated stress management, and 1 evaluated sleep. Only five conducted meta-analyses. These meta-analyses concluded that there is insufficient evidence on the effectiveness of DHI for reducing overall CVD (78) . DHI significantly improved physical activity, HbA1c levels, body weight, empowerment, QoL. DHIs were effective, particularly in the short-term, to decrease the number of drinks consumed/week, DHIs may improve healthy behaviors (i.e., PA and healthy diet) but did not appear to reduce unhealthy behaviors (i.e., smoking, alcohol, and unhealthy diet) (39) . The remaining 52 systematic reviews evaluated only one or two domains. Fifty-one evaluated either diet, PA, or their combination (24 presented meta-analyses) and one evaluated DHI for smoking cessation. What Are the Most Frequent Lifestyle Domains Addressed by DHI? What Are the Most Frequent Outcomes Used to Measure Lifestyle Changes? Figure 3 shows the outcome groups (i.e., objective measures, selfreported measures, biochemical exams, and clinical conditions) and the description of the outcomes, by their frequency. Considering all the groups, objective measures were the most frequently reviewed, in particular, weight, body mass index (BMI), minutes of physical activity (either per day or week), and steps count. The second group was self-reported measures, specifically using scales/questionnaires to evaluate physical activity and dietary intake. Among biochemical measures, the most frequently reviewed were blood lipids (50, 57, 59, 62, 76, 78, 93, 99) and measures related to DM [such a glucose and glycated hemoglobin (39, 42, 51, 78, 79, 84, 104) ]. Finally, regarding clinical conditions, CVD/events (41, 52, 59, 62, 80-82, 92, 93, 95, 96) and psychiatric disorders [depression (46, 80, 81, 84, 87, 92, 93) and anxiety (59, 80, 81, 84, 92, 93) ] were the most common. Some outcomes, such as smoking cessation, were reviewed either as objective measures (94) or self-reported (39, 79, 80, 83, (93) (94) (95) (96) (97) 105) . The most frequent delivery methods of DHIs were apps (n = 47) and websites (n = 42), followed by e-mails and monitoring devices (Figure 2) . Notably, from the 72 studies included, 62 evaluated the effectiveness of more than one delivery method. To our knowledge, this is the first scoping review mapping the most frequent lifestyle domains and outcomes addressed by DHIs. Up to September 2021, we observed that only one systematic review simultaneously evaluated the six lifestyle domains proposed by the American College of Lifestyle Medicine (12) . The majority of the reviews targeted diet and physical activity. Objective measures, such as weight and BMI, were the most frequently observed outcomes, followed by self-reported questionnaires. DHIs were delivered using different technologies, with smartphone apps and websites being the most common. Lifestyle is a developing research theme, which has exponentially attracted interest during the COVID-19 pandemic. Researchers around the world are evaluating the delayed effect of unhealthy behaviors during the pandemic over the population health (i.e., increased incidence of chronic diseases and mental health problems after the changes in lifestyle). Overall, studies evaluated only one or a couple of behaviors that may have changed during this period (106, 107) . Such finding is convergent with our results, showing that most reviews evaluated a single behavior/domain or a combination of diet and PA. This approach is valuable for estimating prevalence and specific targets for public policies, as well as increasing our understanding of each specific domain. However, at the individual level, it disregards that a healthy lifestyle represents a complex balance among multiple behaviors and that the development of chronic diseases results from the combination of different risk factors (i.e., genetic, lifestyle, and environmental) (108) . LM, relying on six main domains, may be a step forward to address those behaviors, their complex interactions, and interconnections-especially if a multidimensional approach is applied. From a research perspective, the main priority should be to clarify the concept of lifestyle, and how to operationalize it. In this sense, guidelines and reporting guidelines are still missing and could be of great value to inform further studies. From the 72 systematic reviews included in our study, 58 addressed diet/nutrition, and 60 evaluated PA. Diet and PA are fundamental features of a healthy lifestyle and well-known risk factors for chronic diseases (1, 11, 109) . Given this importance, it is not a surprise that the most frequent domains and outcomes evaluated in the literature were related to them. Additional factors that may explain the frequency of DHIs addressing diet/PA include their importance for clinical populations, and the availability of objective outcomes to be measured (such as weight, BMI, and biochemical measures). Still, the high heterogeneity of those outcomes, delivery methods, and control groups precluded most of the systematic reviews to perform meta-analyses on the effectiveness of the DHI. Beyond the consensus on those aspects, an upcoming challenge is if and how hard outcomes (mortality or stroke for example) will ever be potential targets for DHIs. Hard outcomes take a longer follow-up time to be observed, while DHIs are fast-changing and volatile. It is possible we will need "adaptive" interventions, with real-time evaluation and modifications guided by short-term outcomes. Although methodological and ethical issues will be raised, creating new short-lived interventions will hardly be cost-effective and/or sustainable in the long run. Regarding SU, LM literature concentrates on the use of tobacco and alcohol which, at the population level, present the highest impact on health. Overall, 7.7 million deaths were attributable to smoking in 2019, with smoking being the major cause of death among men in the world (110) . Since 2015, it is recommended that clinicians screen all adults for cigarette smoking and prescribe some behavioral and pharmacotherapy therapy for smokers (unless there is some medical contraindication) (111) . In 2016, there were 2.4 billion current drinkers globally, and 2.8 million deaths were attributed to alcohol (112) . The burden of disease related to alcohol use may be seen as a result of binge drinking and alcohol use disorders, which usually require different treatment/prevention approaches. Given such figures, it is remarkable that we found only sixteen reviews addressing DHI to decrease SU (mostly to reduce smoking). It is possible that researchers do not recognize the importance of these substances or do not have sufficient training to provide evidence-based interventions. In fact, alcohol use disorders are among the least diagnosed medical conditions in clinical practice (113) , and alcohol remains the blind spot of global health (114) . In addition, as in the case of diet and PA, most reviews evaluating SU were conducted among clinical or at-risk populations, which may represent the most severe and least responsive individuals. Nevertheless, a recent review of systematic reviews found that DHIs have a small but positive effect to decrease alcohol and tobacco use among the general population (115) . Such results are encouraging in the sense that DHI, together with public policies, may represent a step forward in the primary prevention of more than 200 diseases caused by smoking and/or alcohol use. One important aspect to evolve in this endeavor is to rigorously evaluate the severity of the SU disorder to determine who is going to benefit and which components of the DHIs are effective. Stress management and social relationships were among the least evaluated lifestyle domains in our study. Compared to diet and PA, social relationships and stress management present less evidence of the effect on hard outcomes such as mortality. Furthermore, it is difficult to find reliable objective measures/outcomes to be used in DHI. Innovative digital methods to address this gap are necessary and these areas could benefit from passive sensing data obtained via smartphones and wearable devices, in the same way, step count is used to evaluating PA. Digital phenotyping through these tools allows quantifying the biological stress response in real time (116) . In experimental conditions, algorithms developed based on physiological proxies of the autonomic nervous system activity (e.g., heart rate, body temperature, skin temperature, and conductance) have demonstrated a high accuracy to detect stress (117) . Moreover, smartphone-based episodic audio recordings allow analyses of voice and speech features that may be potential vocal markers of stress (118, 119) . Phone usage and the number of calls, texts, and interactions in online social media can be used as proxies of social contact or interaction (116, (120) (121) (122) , while global positioning system (GPS)-based mobility and conversations captured by smartphone microphones were used to estimate social activity and loneliness in individuals with schizophrenia (123) . Social support, however, is more complex than social contacts. To also account for the quality of social relationships, calls to close contacts with strong ties (such as family members and close friends) have been evaluated (124) . Moreover, preliminary evidence suggests that passive audio collection on smartphones combined with machine learning techniques helped to identify auditory stimuli from the social environment of adolescents and young mothers that can signal social support (125) . In the same manner, sleep was evaluated in only three reviews. Sleep problems are a growing concern in global public health due to the severe consequences of poor sleep on cognition, emotion, the risk for serious medical conditions, and mortality (126) . Particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, sleep problems have been highly prevalent with ∼40% of the general population reporting poor sleep quality (127) . Sleep comprises of different areas, such as sleep onset latency, sleep restfulness, sleep disturbances, sleep schedule, efficiency, and daytime napping, among others (126, 128) . Traditional, nondigital interventions to improve sleep quality are well-established and have been used to target specific problems, such as cognitivebehavioral therapy (CBT), relaxation and mindfulness therapy, stimulus control therapy, sleep hygiene education, and similar cognitive-behavioral interventions aiming to improve these areas (129, 130) . DHIs for sleep improvements, such as digital CBT and digital sleep restriction therapy, have demonstrated potential as effective e-health interventions, however, further refinement and investigations of these delivery methods are required (131, 132) . Digital Health Interventions have emerged as promising methods to help patients and people at risk by providing immediate access to suggestions on improvement of nutritional and PA habits, education about their conditions, and medication adherence. The most frequent delivery method we found was the use of a smartphone, which has increased over the last decade following the widespread of this technology. The progressive advancement of efficient, accessible, and reliable technology has made it possible for various populations to have quick access to information and health. This progress has led to the exponential increase of the number of apps addressing lifestyle (22, 133) , and the COVID-19 pandemic will likely lead to a further increase in those numbers. Beyond issues regarding costs (a considerable proportion of apps is paid, although it is hard to estimate the exact proportion) and accessibility (in populations with low cell phone coverage), adherence, usability, and long-term engagement remain to be improved. Co-design and user experience design are important ways to overcome these barriers, as well as behavioral sciences and health economics (134) . As mentioned before, the proper scientific evaluation of DHI effectiveness is still to be determined but important steps, such as the publication of the NICE framework (27) and the WHO recommendations (21) have advanced the field. Importantly, while RCTs are the gold standard to evaluate DHIs, the CONSORT EHEALTH extension should be widely adopted to improve their quality, transparency, and reproducibility (135) . In the same direction, systematic reviews and meta-analyses should also evaluate how closely are those guidelines being followed by authors. Another aspect that has not been adequately assessed in the systematic reviews is the possibility of harm, including confidentiality breaches. Although most people may believe DHIs present low-level harm, it is still necessary to report on that, and even bring to light harms that were not considered beforehand. Our study has some limitations, such as the absence of data (e.g., the sample size of included RCTs) for some systematic reviews, and the complexity of study characteristics: different populations (general population and people at risk or living with specific diseases), interventions, delivery methods, and comparators. To properly answer our research question, the inclusion criteria were broad, including as many systematic reviews as possible, which limited synthesis and comparisons between studies. However, scoping reviews usually aim to provide an overview/map of the evidence instead of the result/answer to a particular question (136) . Nevertheless, our review highlighted the following major gaps to be addressed regarding DHIs to improve lifestyle: (1) the concept of lifestyle is unclear and fragmented, including mostly one or two unhealthy behaviors; (2) lifestyle domains for which there are few objective outcomes to be measured (such as SU, social relationships, and stress management) are understudied; (3) there is a lack of assessment of hard/long-term outcomes; (4) although DHIs are valued by their high accessibility, most studies are not designed to include the general population; and (5) there is high heterogeneity on reporting the methods, such as outcomes, description of the interventions, and control groups. The COVID-19 pandemic has shown the importance of connections and real-time data monitoring in health (137) and has consolidated the use of technology (such as tele-medicine) across the globe. DHIs will be increasingly important to improve lifestyle at primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention. However, to be cost-effective and sustainable, such interventions will need to be constantly monitored, adapted, and fully integrated into health systems. Integrating technologies and data are crucial to inform precision medicine, allowing algorithms to suggest the best interventions for each individual. LM and Public Health may profit from those advances to prevent chronic diseases. The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s. RC and RD conceived the study. RC and CR searched the literature. RC, HP, CO, CR, MS, and RD reviewed the literature and extracted data. MR-A analyzed data. RC, MS, and RD wrote the first draft. VB-M and FK reviewed for important intellectual content. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh. 2021.735624/full#supplementary-material Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019 Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019 Sanchis-Gomar F. Physical inactivity and cardiovascular disease at the time of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): the need to maintain regular physical activity while taking precautions Association of healthy lifestyle with years lived without major chronic diseases A meta-review of " lifestyle psychiatry ": the role of exercise , smoking , diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders Can health behaviours prolong survival and compress the period of survival with the disability? A population-based cohort study Lifestyle risk score and mortality in Korean adults: a populationbased cohort study Lifestyle-Related factors and total mortality in a mediterranean prospective cohort Impact of individual and combined lifestyle factors on mortality in china: a cohort study Available online at The combined effects of healthy lifestyle behaviors on all cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis The assessment of lifestyle changes during the COVID-19 pandemic using a multidimensional scale Lifestyle in undergraduate students and demographically matched controls during the COVID-19 pandemic in spain Depression, anxiety, and lifestyle among essential workers: a web survey from brazil and spain during the COVID-19 pandemic The cumulative effect of multiple dimensions of lifestyle on risky drinking during the Covid-19 pandemic Evaluating digital health interventions: key questions and approaches Developing and evaluating digital interventions to promote behavior change in health and health care: recommendations resulting from an international workshop Classification of Digital Health Interventions v1.0. Geneva: World Health Organi-zation Guideline: Recommendations on Digital Interventions for Health System Strengthening Using health and wellbeing apps for behavior change: a systematic search and rating of apps The lancet commission on global mental health and sustainable development What is an appropriate level of evidence for a digital health intervention? Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence). Evidence Standards Framework for Digital Health Technologies Using digital interventions to improve the cardiometabolic health of populations: ameta-review of reporting quality Mobile apps for mental health issues: meta-review of meta-analyses Web-based interventions for weight loss or weight loss maintenance in overweight and obese people: a systematic review of systematic reviews PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation Rayyana web and mobile app for systematic reviews Rgraphviz: provides plotting capabilities for R graph objects. R Package Smartphone-based interventions to reduce sedentary behavior and promote physical activity using integrated dynamic models: systematic review Long-term effectiveness of mhealth physical activity interventions: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials A systematic review of just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) to promote physical activity The effectiveness of e-& mHealth interventions to promote physical activity and healthy diets in developing countries: a systematic review Digital technology interventions for risk factor modification in patients with cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis Technology-assisted weight management interventions: systematic review of clinical trials Web-based digital health interventions for weight loss and lifestyle habit changes in overweight and obese adults: systematic review and meta-analysis The impact of mobile health interventions on chronic disease outcomes in developing countries: a systematic review The effect of technology-mediated diabetes prevention interventions on weight: a meta-analysis The effectiveness of selfguided web-based physical activity interventions among patients with a chronic disease: A systematic review Consumer-based wearable activity trackers increase physical activity participation: systematic review and meta-analysis Modes of e-Health delivery in secondary prevention programmes for patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review Effect of behavioral weight management interventions using lifestyle mhealth self-monitoring on weight loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis The efficacy of wearable activity tracking technology as part of a weight loss program: a systematic review Lifestyle interventions to maternal weight loss after birth: A systematic review Internet interventions to support lifestyle modification for diabetes management: a systematic review of the evidence Does evidence support the use of mobile phone apps as a driver for promoting healthy lifestyles from a public health perspective? A systematic review of randomized control trials Internet-based interventions for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease Effects of eHealth-based multiple health behavior change interventions on physical activity, healthy diet, and weight in people with noncommunicable diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis Lifestyle interventions for cardiovascular disease risk reduction: a systematic review of the effects of diet composition, food provision, and treatment modality on weight loss The effects of dietary mobile apps on nutritional outcomes in adults with chronic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis The use of eHealth to promote physical activity in cancer survivors: a systematic review Impact of technologybased patient education on modifiable cardiovascular risk factors of people with coronary heart disease: a systematic review Effectiveness of lifestyle interventions for preventing harmful weight gain among young adults from lower socioeconomic status and ethnically diverse backgrounds: a systematic review Telehealth interventions versus center-based cardiac rehabilitation of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis EHealth interventions for the prevention and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis Information and communications technology-based telehealth approach for occupational therapy interventions for cancer survivors: a systematic review Telehealth interventions for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lifestyle interventions based on the diabetes prevention program delivered via eHealth: a systematic review and meta-analysis Telehealth methods to deliver dietary interventions in adults with chronic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Mhealth interventions to address physical activity and sedentary behavior in cancer survivors: a systematic review A technology-mediated interventional approach to the prevention of metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis Social media use for nutrition outcomes in young adults: a mixed-methods systematic review Effect of web-based lifestyle modification on weight control: a meta-analysis A systematic review and meta-analysis: effectiveness of internet empowerment-based self-management interventions on adults with metabolic diseases Mobile app-based health promotion programs: a systematic review of the literature Technologyassisted weight loss interventions in primary care: a systematic review Using an electronic activity monitor system as an intervention modality: a systematic review health behavior, health promotion and society Wearable activity trackers for promoting physical activity: a systematic meta-analytic review The effectiveness of smartphone apps for lifestyle improvement in noncommunicable diseases: systematic review and meta-analyses A systematic review of electronic mindfulness-based therapeutic interventions for weight, weightrelated behaviors, and psychological stress The effectiveness of electronic health interventions on blood pressure control, self-care behavioural outcomes and psychosocial well-being in patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis Effectiveness of mobile health (mHealth) interventions for promoting healthy eating in adults: a systematic review Telehealth interventions for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis" Assessing the impact of telemonitoring-facilitated lifestyle modifications on diabetes outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis A systematic review of eHealth behavioral interventions targeting smoking, nutrition, alcohol, physical activity and/or obesity for young adults Internet-Delivered Self-management Support for Improving Coronary Heart Disease and Self-management Y Related Outcomes A Systematic Review Patients' use of social media for diabetes self-care: systematic review The effectiveness of mobile-health behaviour change interventions for cardiovascular disease self-management: a systematic review Using mobile applications to increase physical activity: a systematic review Critical review and meta-analysis of multicomponent behavioral E-health interventions for weight loss eHealth interventions for fruit and vegetable intake: a meta-analysis of effectiveness A systematic review of tailored eHealth interventions for weight loss Efficacy of interventions that use apps to improve diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviour: a systematic review A systematic review of the effectiveness of smartphone applications that encourage dietary selfregulatory strategies for weight loss in overweight and obese adults Evaluation of internet-based interventions on waist circumference reduction: a meta-analysis Efficacy of tailoredprint interventions to promote physical activity: a systematic review of randomised trials Ehealth interventions for people with chronic kidney disease Effect of eHealth cardiac rehabilitation on health outcomes of coronary heart disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev Toward a digital platform for the self-management of noncommunicable disease: systematic review of platform-like interventions Personalized mobile technologies for lifestyle behavior change: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression Effectiveness of telehealth interventions as a part of secondary prevention in coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis Internet programs targeting multiple lifestyle interventions in primary and secondary care are not superior to usual care alone in improving cardiovascular risk profile: a systematic review The effectiveness of app-based mobile interventions on nutrition behaviours and nutritionrelated health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Web-based multidomain lifestyle programs for brain health: comprehensive overview and meta-analysis Interactive computer-based interventions for weight loss or weight maintenance in overweight or obese people Social media interventions for diet and exercise behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Weight management in young adults: systematic review of electronic health intervention components and outcomes The efficacy of mobile phone apps for lifestyle modification in diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis The effect of smartphone app-based interventions for patients with hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis Lifestyle and mental health disruptions during COVID-19 Change in tobacco and electronic cigarette use and motivation to quit in response to COVID-19 Global perspectives on improving chronic disease prevention and management in diverse settings Lifestyle Psychiatry Spatial, temporal, and demographic patterns in prevalence of smoking tobacco use and attributable disease burden in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis from the global burden of disease study Behavioral and pharmacotherapy interventions for tobacco smoking cessation in adults, including pregnant women: U.S. Preventive services task force recommendation statement Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016 Clinical recognition and recording of alcohol disorders by clinicians in primary and secondary care: metaanalysis Alcohol: global health's blind spot Effectiveness of digital interventions for reducing behavioral risks of cardiovascular disease in nonclinical adult populations: systematic review of reviews Unlocking stress and forecasting its consequences with digital technology Smart devices and wearable technologies to detect and monitor mental health conditions and stress: a systematic review Stress measurement using speech: recent advancements, validation issues, and ethical and privacy considerations Wearable, environmental, and smartphone-based passive sensing for mental health monitoring Discovering composite lifestyle biomarkers with artificial intelligence from clinical studies to enable smart ehealth and digital therapeutic services Correlates of stress in the college environment uncovered by the application of penalized generalized estimating equations to mobile sensing data A mobile sensing app to monitor youth mental health: observational pilot study Smartphone sensing of social interactions in people with and without schizophrenia Identifying behavioral phenotypes of loneliness and social isolation with passive sensing: statistical analysis, data mining and machine learning of smartphone and fitbit data What does social support sound like? Challenges and opportunities for using passive episodic audio collection to assess the social environment The role of sleep hygiene in promoting public health: a review of empirical evidence Sleep problems during the COVID-19 pandemic by population: a systematic review and meta-analysis The national sleep foundation's sleep health index Systematic review and meta-analysis of adolescent cognitivebehavioral sleep interventions Behavioral interventions for insomnia: theory and practice A digital sleep restriction system for insomnia therapy based on sleep window shift negotiation Digital delivery of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia Mobile apps for health behavior change in physical activity, diet, drug and alcohol use, and mental health: systematic review Designing for Behavior Change: Applying Psychology and Behavioral Economics CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of web-based and mobile health interventions Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach Lifestyle behaviours during the COVID-19 -time to connect The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.