key: cord-0916586-fga6jmh3
authors: Santarone, Kristen; Meneses, Evander; Shepherd, Aaron; Boneva, Dessy; Mckenney, Mark; Elkbuli, Adel
title: Surgeons and social media: The use of twitter hashtags at the Academic Surgical Congress 2015–2019 a cross sectional study
date: 2020-09-06
journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond)
DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.004
sha: a16d725b144511fabb4eb01f1dc6ff33e72b863e
doc_id: 916586
cord_uid: fga6jmh3

BACKGROUND: The use of Twitter hashtags at medical conferences has revolutionized the way healthcare professionals interact and advance their education. We aim to investigate the scope of the Academic Surgical Congress's online reach and engagement through the use of Twitter hashtags #ASC from 2015 to 2019, by analyzing the number of impressions and tweets and retweets. METHODS: A cross sectional study of Twitter data through Symplur with the following conference hashtags for the Academic Surgical Congress annual meetings for years 2015–2019: #ASC2015, #ASC2016, #ASC2017, #ASC2018, and #ASC2019. Data on tweets, retweets, users, and impressions was reviewed along with information on the top 10 influencers and the most frequently tweeted links. Symplur Signals software was utilized to extract and assimilate data. Statistical Significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: Twitter engagement metrics significantly increased from 11,400 to 32,100 from 2015 to 2017 (p < 0.05). However, from 2017 to 2019, there was a significant decline in engagement metrics from 32,100 to 26,100 (p < 0.05). Impressions increased significantly from 13,100 in 2015 to 71,800 impressions in 2019 (p < 0.05). Users grew significantly from 1500 in 2015 to peak at 4600 in 2017 before dropping back to 3300 in 2019 (p < 0.05). The most influential organizations during these years were the organizers of the conference: Association for Academic Surgery and the Society of University Surgeons. Conference attendance progressively increased from approximately 1700 in 2016 to about 2100 in 2019 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Twitter engagement metrics at the Academic Surgical Congress 2015–2019 has fluctuated, while impressions significantly increased through the years indicating the consistent dissemination of conference content.

The use of Twitter at medical conferences has revolutionized the way healthcare professionals advance their education. Instant dissemination of new ideas and online interactions through the use of Twitter hashtags has greatly magnified the reach of medical conferences materials. Twitter is uniquely suited to improve communication and spread of ideas at conferences because of its simple, free access and interactive format. Users publish tweets with a 280-character limit that can include identifying hashtags, that other users can "like," retweet and respond to. In addition to the text, users can include pictures, videos and links in their tweets.

Twitter provides the unique opportunity for physicians to build an online brand or personality. This has improved opportunities for connections and even mentorship with medical trainees or other professionals (1) . The same study also found that Twitter puts inexperienced attendees on the same platform as presenters who are often experts on the topics that they are presenting. The use of physician influencers to increase the utilization of the conference hashtag by having them tweet meeting content and engage participants who may not be in attendance has also proven effective (2) (3) (4) . Additionally, Twitter has been shown in the literature to provide several benefits towards the dissemination of academic medicine (1, 5) . A study by Djuricich coined the term "evidence-based tweeting" which allows physicians to tweet newly discovered findings and provide the relevant literature in subsequent tweets (5) . This has furthered reach into medical conferences where attendees are now equipped with tools to quickly spread this novel information.

Many studies have shown that Twitter improved medical conferences online participation from year to year by documenting increasing numbers of tweets, users and impressions (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) .

One study found that after promoting use of a hashtag at the conference, their organizational J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f profile showed a 20% increase in followers over the next week (15) . Understanding the impact of the use of Twitter on surgical conferences is invaluable to advance education in the field of surgery. Despite this, data regarding the use of Twitter at surgical conferences is limited.

Using conference hashtags to increase a conference's online presence benefits not only those in attendance but those following the conference proceedings remotely. Through a targeted emphasis on the online impact of medical conferences, we can help ensure those who are unable to attend conferences due to work or time constraints are still able to learn from the novel ideas presented.

In this study, we aim to investigate the scope of the Academic Surgical Congress's (ASCs) online reach and engagement through the use of Twitter hashtags #ASC from 2015-2019. We measure this by analyzing the number of impressions (reachability metrics measured in millions) and engagement (tweets & retweets metrics measured in thousands). The ASC is a combined meeting of the two leading associations for academic surgery -The Association for Academic Surgery (AAS) and The Society of University Surgeons (SUS). As a prominent international surgical conference, which is greatly attended, the potential for impact is more significant than many other conferences that have been previously analyzed. Additionally, there have been no studies investigating the reach of the ASCs Twitter use over the period of multiple years. We hypothesize that increased Twitter impressions and engagements will result in wide dissemination of knowledge/conference material and increase the conference attendance rate.

A cross sectional review of Twitter data at the ASC from 2015-2019. Symplur Signals software (Upland,CA), designed specifically for hashtags related to healthcare topics was used to review and analyze studied Twitter metrics. We analyzed the following conference hashtags: #ASC2015, #ASC2016, #ASC2017, #ASC2018 and #ASC2019. From this analysis, we obtained information on the number of engagements, impressions, and users who participated by using the conference hashtags. Only publicly available twitter data metrics were utilized for analysis. This study was reviewed by our Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Western Institutional Review Board (WIRB) and deemed exempt.

Data obtained from Symplur was analyzed to obtain a more thorough understanding of the breadth of Twitter use at the ASC from 2015-2019. The term "impression" is defined as the number of people who only viewed a tweet containing the conference hashtag, but did not engage. In contrast, "engagement" is defined as action on conference content through user tweets containing the conference hashtag or "likes", retweets or comments on a Tweet containing the conference hashtag. "Twitter influencers", who are accounts of either organizations or individuals, are able to gather a significant amount of impressions and tweet engagement due to their large number of followers. Therefore, we investigated the role of twitter influencers on hashtag engagement. These influencers are defined through Symplur as having high conference hashtag utilization. This study was reported in line with the Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery (STROCSS) 2019 guidelines (16) . Table 1 .

The term "users" refers to Twitter accounts that participated in meeting conversation by tweeting the conference hashtag. Users grew from 1,500 in 2015 and 3,800 in 2016, to peak at 4,600 in 2017 before dipping back to 3,700 in 2018 and 3,300 in 2019.

Symplur signals provides data on the Most Tweeted Links containing the meeting hashtag. The Most Tweeted Links represent articles that were presented at the conference, however there were a significant amount of outdated links that have since been deleted as our study refers back to posts dating as far back as 2015.

The Top 10 Twitter influencers by year were primarily occupied by the Association for Academic Surgery (@Academic Surgery, AAS), followed by the Society of University Surgeons (@UnivSurgeon, SUS). Other contributing organizations included the Association of Women Surgeons (@WomenSurgeons, AWS). The remaining influencers were individual physicians at varying academic levels and from a myriad of surgical specialties as summarized in Table 2 . Understanding where the majority of the conference tweets originate is crucial to the discussion on engagement. In this study, engagement is defined as the number of "likes", tweets, retweets, or comments; however, these numbers may not reflect continuous conversation or involvement as active as it may appear. For example, in 2017 when engagement was the highest, 71% of users only used the conference hashtag once, which does not indicate active participation or conversation. These numbers remained largely the same, even in 2019, when only 13.5% of users tweeted more than 5 times. Twitter engagement may have stagnated also in part due to policies and ways of advertisement for hashtag promotion. Displaying the hashtag on other conference materials such as name tags, agendas, and programming and even on lecture slides also has the potential to increase awareness and boost Twitter use. It is also presumable that attendees simply did not remember to include the hashtag when tweeting about conference materials. This may be addressed by J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f widespread encouragement and promotion of hashtag inclusion into tweets. Additionally, using physician influencers to boost Twitter use and start online conversations may also increase participation (18, 19) . Finally, content published from meetings may not have been published in a visually attractive or easily understandable format which could have led to lower interaction.

Including links to videos, infographics and pictures in addition to commentary can increase a tweet's appeal.

As Twitter has the potential to include participants nationally and globally, it has a particularly unique role in enhancing engagement in an international conference such as the ASC. In a study of the Canadian Geriatrics Conference, tweets were separated by content such as conference sessions, networking, resource sharing, and conference promotion. This study also found that 60% of Twitter participants were not Canadian, indicating an international reach (20) .

Up to 26% of Twitter participation in the Irish Society of Urology's National Meeting were by virtual followers not attending the conference, indicating the expansive reach that internet communication allows (21) . Similarly, the American Urology Society surveyed urologists, 33% of whom stated that they have participated in a Urology conference remotely through Twitter (22) . At the 2016 conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation in Health, it was found that of the 2,639 tweets related to the conference, 22 locations outside of the U.S.

were represented (23) . In 2014, Cochran et al. published on the impact of Twitter at the 2013 ASC meeting. They discovered that there were 434 tweets containing that years' hashtag, and of the 37 users that were identifiable, only 51% were in actual attendance at the ASC 2013 meeting (24) . This suggests the impact that hashtags and twitter engagement can have on stirring discussion and conversation with those unable to attend the conference thereby widening its impact as shown in other medical-society meetings. While this has been the major work on social J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f media usage at the ASC conference until now, our analysis of multiple years allowed us to track change in engagement and impressions over time and elucidate further details on engagement.

A study of 14 Anesthesiology conferences showed no relationship between meeting attendance, registration, total tweets, impressions and retweets. However, a positive correlation was demonstrated between the number of Twitter users participating using the conference hashtags and the Twitter metrics of tweets, retweets, impressions and comments (25) .

Additionally, a study by Rabarison et al. found that the use of hashtags helped to promote conversation between healthcare experts and their audience, by providing an organized space for discourse (28) . Patients or other non-physician users who interact and with conference hashtags have the ability to further propagate conversation and information (29) . The usage of hashtags and efforts to track engagement allows for discernment of which topics or presentations may be the most impactful or important as they may represent large foci of the conversation (30).

We recommend that scientific medical meetings use Twitter to increase their online participation of those attending and those following along remotely in order to increase knowledge dissemination. Ensuring that the hashtag is advertised on Twitter and on the association's website can boost hashtag use before and during the conference (31).

Disseminating information via social media also allows the conference to become more streamlined. Physical attendees can still be updated on a topic of their interest while attending a different session at that same conference, preventing a gap in knowledge from not physically being present during that specific session (32) .

This study has several limitations. Data regarding conference attendance in 2015 was not available. In addition, information may have been tweeted regarding the conference where J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f the hashtag was not used. Conversely, hashtags may have been utilized in tweets not containing relevant conference information. Symplur Signals is not an exhaustive software, and certain information could not be obtained from our analysis, such as the occupation of each individual user who interacted with meeting content. Therefore we were unable to ascertain which tweets are from medical professionals versus the general public. Filters created by Symplur signals were utilized to provide data only on Tweets published in English and in the North American time zone. Importantly, Twitter engagement relates to the previous years' attendance. Finally, there may be a proportion of meeting participants and attendees who do not utilize social media or Twitter for academic discussions.

The recent COVID-19 pandemic has clearly shown that such sudden unanticipated disruptions that lead to health and safety concerns result in the cancellation of upcoming medical meetings, conferences and training courses. This has led to renewed interest for consideration of developing a virtual web-based platform to minimize the impact of not being able to attend these educational symposia in person. Twitter and other social media platforms may serve as an important alternative to continuing to disseminate the educational component of these meetings.

We theorize that these internet-based services will continue to grow in importance and may provide a resilient solution to any future global health crises and/or inclement climate issues, while potentially minimizing missed educational opportunities. They will continue to provide an easily accessible network to allowing meeting content to be available for remote audiences. We also suspect that engagement will increase during these times as the transition to remote conferences will encourage active participation by conference attendees. Developing these innovative alternative options is crucial to continue the spread of medical research knowledge and improved clinical care despite impediments.

Twitter serves as a free of cost online forum to increase the interactions and engagement between surgeons, facilitate the spread of new research ideas and advance the scientific learning process. As social media is constantly growing in the evolution of our digital society, we anticipate that the role of Twitter will continue to increase in conferences in the future.

Twitter engagement metrics and number of users at the ASC has fluctuated through the years, however the consistent increase in numbers of Twitter impressions show conference content can still be widely disseminated. Twitter hashtag usage may have contributed to the increased in attendance rates throughout the years. Using Twitter to maximize the dissemination of scientific surgical research and evidence-based practices and guidelines is highly beneficial to all medical professionals, particularly surgeon scientists, leading to not only improving their scientific knowledge and research skills but also ultimately translating into improved patient care.

J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f 

Live Tweet The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Annual Meeting: How to Leverage Twitter to Maximize Your Conference Experience

Therefore I Learn: An Analysis of Twitter Use Across Anesthesiology Conferences

Trends in Twitter use during the Annual Meeting of the Spanish Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology

Twitter use and its implications in Spanish Association of Surgeons meetings and congresses

Social Media, Evidence-Based Tweeting and

Social media in critical care: Fad or a new standard in medical education? An analysis of international critical care conferences between

#CGS2015: An Evaluation of Twitter Use at the Canadian Geriatrics Society Annual Scientific Meeting

Social media expands the reach of the 2017 ACS Annual Meeting

Not your daughter's Facebook: Twitter use at the European Society of Cardiology Conference

Therefore I Learn: An Analysis of Twitter Use Across Anesthesiology Conferences

Trends in Twitter use during the Annual Meeting of the Spanish Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology

Twitter expands the reach and engagement of a national scientific meeting: the Irish Society of Urology

The social media revolution is changing the conference experience: analytics and trends from eight international meetings

Tweeting the Meeting: Twitter Use at The American Society of Breast Surgeons Annual Meeting

Tweeting the Meeting: Quantitative and qualitative twitter activity during the 38 th ESSO conference

The STROCSS 2019 Guideline: Strengthening the Reporting of

Cohort Studies in Surgery

Is boredom proneness related to social media overload and fatigue? A stress-strain-outcome approach

#InSituPathologists: how the #USACP2015 meeting went viral on Twitter and founded the social media movement for the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology

Use of Twitter to document the 2013 Academic Surgical Congress

#CGS2015: An Evaluation of Twitter Use at the Canadian Geriatrics Society Annual Scientific Meeting

Twitter expands the reach and engagement of a national scientific meeting: the Irish Society of Urology

Increasing Social Media Use in Urology

American Urological Association Survey

Twitter use at the 2016 Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation in Health: analyzing #DIScience16

Use of Twitter to document the 2013 Academic Surgical Congress

Visualizing Seven Years Of Twitter's Evolution

Mapping the global Twitter heartbeat: The geography of Twitter

Therefore I learn: An Analysis of Twitter Use Across Anesthesiology Conferences. Anesthesia and Analgesia

Measuring Audience Engagement for Public Health Twitter Chats: Insights From #LiveFitNOLA

Patient Participation at Health Care Conferences: Engaged Patients Increase Information Flow, Expand Propagation, and Deepen Engagement in the Conversation of Tweets Compared to Physicians or Researchers

Social Medicine: Twitter in Healthcare

Increased use of Twitter at a medical conference: a report and a review of the educational opportunities

How people are using Twitter during conferences. Creativity and Innovation Competencies on the Web

The following additional information is required for submission. Please note that failure to respond to these questions/statements will mean your submission will be returned. If you have nothing to declare in any of these categories then this should be stated.

Not applicable. This study was conducted in compliance with ethical standards, reviewed by our institutional review board and the Western Institutional Review Board and deemed exempt.

Please enter the name of the registry and the unique identifying number of the study. You can register your research at http://www.researchregistry.com to obtain your UIN if you have not already registered your study. This is mandatory for human studies only.

Please specify the contribution of each author to the paper, e.g. study design, data collections, data analysis, writing. Others, who have contributed in other ways should be listed as contributors. 

The Guarantor is the one or more people who accept full responsibility for the work and/or the conduct of the study, had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish.

J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f