key: cord-0915538-5x5ag51n authors: Kundu, Satyajit; Al Banna, Md. Hasan; Sayeed, Abu; Begum, Musammet Rasheda; Brazendale, Keith; Hasan, M. Tasdik; Habiba, Sanjida Jahan; Abid, Mohammad Tazrian; Khan, Md. Asaduzzaman; Chowdhury, Sukanta; Kormoker, Tapos; Proshad, Ram; Khan, Md Shafiqul Islam title: Knowledge, attitudes, and preventive practices toward the COVID-19 pandemic: an online survey among Bangladeshi residents date: 2021-08-14 journal: Z Gesundh Wiss DOI: 10.1007/s10389-021-01636-5 sha: 29d02b0de254c6fd288fde10a958867ff0911f27 doc_id: 915538 cord_uid: 5x5ag51n AIM: The novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) has rapidly infected people worldwide, leading to a massive public reaction. Peoples’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) toward COVID-19 are the most important for the control and prevention of the infectious disease pandemic. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, and preventive practices (KAP) toward the COVID-19 among Bangladeshi residents during the lockdown situation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: An online-based cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1765 Bangladeshi adults through the social media networks of the authors. RESULTS: The respondents were older than 18 years, with an average age of 24.88 years (SD 6.30). Approximately 15% of our participants received online training. The mean knowledge score was 14.49 (SD 1.8, range 0–17), and the overall correct response rate on this knowledge test was 85%. Approximately 67.2% scored well (above the mean 4.5, range 1–5) regarding the practices. To avoid the infection, 96.6% wore masks outside the home, and 98.7% washed their hands with soap when they came back. COVID-19 knowledge score was significantly associated with a lower odds of (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.79–0.92) negative attitudes. Again, the awareness score was associated with a lower likelihood of (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.87–0.98) poor practices. CONCLUSION: Online health education programs focusing on young people, housewives, and people with less education may potentially improve the attitudes and practices to control the COVID-19 pandemic in the long term in such a low-resource setting. The novel coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) is a highly transmissible human respiratory disease that infected more than 10 million people and caused approximately 501,000 deaths worldwide as of 1 July 2020 (WHO 2020a). COVID-19 is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that first appeared in Wuhan, China (Rothan and Byrareddy 2020; Banna et al. 2020; Kundu et al. 2020 ). This zoonotic virus can be transmitted by droplets, fecal-oral route, and direct contact, and has an incubation period of 1 to 14 days (Schoeman and Fielding 2019; CDC 2020; Huynh and Nguyen 2020; Li et al. 2020; WHO 2020b) , after which, it can cause flu-like symptoms and serious respiratory failure and death. The elderly and those with chronic diseases are at a greater risk of more serious health outcomes (He et al. 2020; Sayeed et al. 2020a ; Eurosurveillance Team 2020). Contrarily, individuals who test positive for COVID-19 can show no symptoms and may not be as contagious, limiting their ability to spread the virus (Lauren M. Sauer 2020). Due to these situations, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 as a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) (He et al. 2020 ; Eurosurveillance Team 2020; WHO 2020c) and a "global pandemic" on 11 March 2020 (WHO 2020d). On 8 March 2020, Bangladesh reported its first COVID-19 case (Anadolu Agency 2020; Sayeed et al. 2020b; WHO 2020e) . As part of efforts to contain the outbreak, on 16 March 2020, the Government of Bangladesh closed all educational institutions to contain the COVID-19 outbreak. The government also forbid all public gatherings, announced the closure of public and private offices (WHO 2020f; Begum et al. 2021 Begum et al. , kundu et al. 2020 , and suspended travel from current countries that were showing the highest number of COVID-19 cases at the time: China, Iran, and Italy (Anadolu Agency 2020). The response of the citizens to these government rules was largely unknown and undocumented and ultimately depends on their attitude and perception of the seriousness of the problem (De La Vega et al. 2020) . As of 1 July 2020, COVID 19 confirmed cases in Bangladesh increased to 1,45,484, including 1874 deaths (IEDCR 2020). As there is no current cure or vaccine for the COVID-19 and medical treatments are limited to supportive care (Bhagavathula et al. 2020; Huynh and Nguyen 2020) , the WHO has placed an emphasis on prevention. This includes increasing the awareness of the disease and its consequences for health, promoting good personal hygiene practices, and suggesting a positive attitude toward diseased persons, all in an effort to contain the transmission of COVID-19 (WHO 2020g) . In the past, knowledge, attitudes, precautionary behaviors, and active social participation had positive effects on the control of the epidemics of SARS, Ebola, and H1N1 human influenza flu (Bell 2004; Vartti et al. 2009; Dorfan and Woody 2011; Yang and Chu 2018) . Knowledge of infection pathways and relevant precautions to take is needed to control the pandemic. Previous studies (Brug et al. 2004; Choi and Yang 2010; Hussain et al. 2012) showed that the knowledge of infectious disease allows the individual to act to prevent infection. To achieve ultimate success against COVID-19 in Bangladesh, people's awareness, healthy practices, and positive commitment are necessary to help contain transmission of the virus, according to KAP theory (Tachfouti et al. 2012; Ajilore et al. 2017) . To the best of our knowledge, a limited number of studies have investigated the KAP toward COVID-19 among Bangladeshi residents. There is an urgent need to understand the public's awareness, especially the educated and internet experienced Bangladeshis toward COVID-19 at this critical moment, to facilitate its outbreak management as efforts toward a vaccine remain underway. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitude and practices among the people of Bangladesh during the COVID-19 pandemic. A web-based survey using cross-sectional design was conducted from 12-28 April 2020, approximately one week after the lockdown of Bangladesh. Because a community-based national sampling survey was not feasible during this situation, we decided to collect the data online. The authors distributed the survey link in all divisions of Bangladesh via social media using snowball sampling. The authors assumed 50% desired responses of KAP, 5% level of significance, and 2.5% margin of error, the total sample size was 1537 to achieve 80% power. During the data collection period, we found 1765 participants. All individuals were included in the analysis. The survey targeted responses primarily from individuals 18 years and older. The study sample was drawn from eight Bangladesh divisions (i.e., regions/states) each representing approximately 10.2-16.3% of the entire sample, except for one division (Sylhet division) (7.3%). We developed an anonymous online questionnaire to gather data from respondents, developed using WHO course materials on emerging respiratory viruses, including COVID-19. The study tool was originally written in English and then translated into Bangla by an expert in both languages (WHO, 2020b . Prior to data collection, the online questionnaire was piloted in a random sample of users group to identify any problems related to clarity and understanding. The online questionnaire included a short overview of the context, purpose, procedures, statements about the voluntary and confidential nature of participant responses, and additional notes to assist with completing the questionnaire. The study was performed following the Helsinki Declaration as revised in 2013. By clicking the link sent to the participants' inbox, the user was automatically directed to the study overview and informed consent page. Consenting participants were required to complete demographic information prior to completing the questionnaire. The study was conducted following the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet ESurveys (CHERRIES) guidelines. The survey instrument was 37-close ended questions and took about 5-7 min to complete. The 37-item questionnaire was split into four sections, including participant demographics (11 items), knowledge about COVID-19 (17 items), attitudes toward COVID-19 (6 items), and practices related to COVID-19 (5 items). These questions were addressed with an additional "I don't know" option on a true/false foundation; 1 point was allocated for the correct answer and 0 points for the incorrect/unknown response. The overall score for knowledge ranged from 0 to 17; the score for attitude ranged from 0 to 6; and the score for practice ranged from 0 to 5. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the knowledge questions, questions toward attitude, and questions related to practice were 0.80, 0.81, and 0.79, respectively, indicating acceptable internal consistency (Taber 2018 ). Descriptive analyses (frequency, percent, mean, and standard deviation) were computed in all demographic variables, and for knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) toward COVID-19. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and independent sample t-test were employed for KAP across all demographical variables. Multiple linear regression was used to assess the factors associated with the knowledge scores of COVID-19. Based on the adjusted R square and Mallow's C p criterion, the regression model was selected as the final model. All assumptions were checked regarding linear regression after fitting the model. A binary and multinomial logistic regression model was applied for the practice and attitude domains, respectively, to explore the associated factors. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to quantify the associations. All analyses were completed using the statistical package SPSS (version 23.0) and SAS (version 9.3). The level of significance was set at 5% for all analyses. Out of 1765 respondents, all the participants were Bangladeshi citizens, 64% male, with an average age of 24.8 years (SD = 6.30, range 18-72 years). Over half (54.9%) of the respondents were between 21 and 25 years of age. Unmarried persons made up over 75% of participants. Among the online users, 99.2% knew the mode of transmission, 93.3% were informed about clinical signs, and 92.5% agreed with 2-14 days incubation. Regarding minimizing the spread of the virus, 99.2% of respondents knew that hand hygiene, covering nose and mouth while coughing, avoiding contact with sick persons, and avoiding crowded places can reduce their risk of contracting COVID-19. Also, 99% of respondents knew that home quarantine is crucial to other's safety ( Table 1) . The mean knowledge score was 14.49 (SD = 1.8, range 0-17). This average score indicated that a substantial proportion of respondents was aware of the basic knowledge of COVID-19. The overall correct response rate on this knowledge test was 85% (14.49/17 × 100). Knowledge mean scores were significantly different across all demographical variables except gender. Male (85.5%), aged between 26 and 30 years old (83.4%), masters educated persons (88.5%), health professionals (90.5%), city area peoples (86.3%), and trained respondents (90.0%) responded better among the respective categories (Table 2) . Multiple linear regression models were selected by using adjusted R-square (R 2 a ) (0.62) and smallest Mallows Cpcriterion (13.70). Also, normality, independence, homoscedasticity, and linearity satisfied the model. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that age ≤ 20 years (vs. > 30 years), ≤ 30,000 BDT income (vs. > 30,000 BDT), Hindu and others religion (vs. Muslim), secondary education, higher secondary and undergraduate (vs. masters), business, and others (vs. employee) were associated with lower knowledge scores of COVID-19. On the other hand, male (vs. female), scientific features (vs. TV), and training (vs. no training) were associated with higher scores. There was an interaction effect between occupation business (vs. employee) and training (vs. no training) ( Table 3) . Just over half (51.7%) of the participants have confidence that Bangladesh will win the battle against COVID-19. Similarly, 54.4% were worried that they and family members could get sick with COVID-19 at any time and did not want any individuals in the community even after they recovered from illness. In addition, 94.1% of responders thought that social distancing is essential to stop the spread of the virus. All attitudes were significantly associated with different demographic variables. Only gender was not associated with attitudes. The mean knowledge score was significantly different for all attitudes toward COVID-19 (Table 4) . Characteristics of the participants were associated with the attitudes toward the COVID-19. On the contrary, people who received online training were less likely not to win the combat against COVID-19. Unemployed responders and homemakers were more likely to be unsure about the win over COVID-19. In the event of getting ill, older people (age > 30) and television viewers were more likely to disagree about being sick than younger people (age ≤ 20) and individuals who used miscellaneous outlets for details. With respect to social distancing, those who did not receive COVID-19 training were more likely to be unaware of controlling COVID-19. Unmarried persons and television audiences (vs. other sources) were more disagreeable about not allowing people in the community following recovery from the virus. Untrained persons were more confused about allowing the recovered persons back into society (Table 5) . More than 11% of respondents recently went outside the house. As protective measures, 96.6% wore masks outside, 98.7% washed hands with soap, and 82.8% changed clothing when they returned home. Recently, more than one-third of employed persons went outside, followed by individuals who were aged over 30 years old (23.5%), and who were married (20.6%), respectively. Approximately 88% disinfected their hands after sneezing or coughing when they used their hands to cover their mouth. Only high school students comparatively ignored (67.6%) the practices. All practices were significantly associated with different demographic variables. The mean knowledge scores were significantly different for the three practices such as wearing a mask when going outside, disinfect hands, and changes clothes after returning from outside (P2, P3, and P4) ( Table 6 ). Table 7 shows practices toward COVID-19 and associated factors. Based on the average value of respondents (mean, 4.5), the practice score was classified as poor or low (≤4.5) versus high (>4.5) score. Almost 67.2% scored high regarding the practices. The goodness of fit for the logistic regression model was (Chi-square = 7.49 and P = 0.481) verified by Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness of fit test. Male (vs. female, OR 3.22, P < 0.001), 26 to 30 age group (vs. above 30 years, OR 1.32, P = 0.027), married person (vs. unmarried, OR 1.58, P = 0.010), undergraduate students (vs. master's students, OR 1.42, P = 0.03), non-employee and housewife (vs. employee, OR 3.38 and 5.07, P = 0.002 and P = 0.001), newspaper readers (vs. TV audiences, OR 1.62, P = 0.009), and COVID-19 knowledge score (OR 0.94, P = 0.003) were significantly associated with low practice scores. Bangladesh has entered into community transmission phases of the COVID-19 pandemic (Anwar et al. 2020b) . People in the community face several challenges during such periods. People should be well aware and practice accordingly to reduce the risk of being infected and transmitting the virus to others. This study first explored the KAP toward COVID-19 among a subpopulation of educated, young adults, and internet experienced people in Bangladesh. Most of our studied participants (85%) responded correctly on overall basic knowledge of COVID-19, which was similar to China (90%) (Zhong et al. 2020) , Iran (90% and 85% in two knowledge tests) (Erfani et al. 2020) , and the USA residents (80% knowledge scores) (Clements 2020 ). The small fluctuation may be due to the variation in characteristics of participants such as the highly educated sample (Zhong et al. 2020) , and the inclusion of more health-related professionals (Erfani et al. 2020) . For instance, we found a 90.5% correct response rate among health professionals, which was in accordance with the findings from Vietnamese health workers (Huynh and Nguyen 2020) . Moreover, types of questions also affect the mean response rate of participants. The rate could be lower for more technical queries. This study showed the lowest correct response rates for K13 (COVID-19 is caused by a virus called SARS-CoV-2) (29.8%), which decreased the mean rates of correct answers for all queries. A study conducted in India revealed the responders had a moderate level of knowledge on infection, and adequate knowledge about its preventive aspects with the authors stating this is likely due to the government and media emphasizing more preventive measures (Roy et al. 2020) . Though there is a lag in the presence of the virus in Bangladesh during the survey, the study participants were educated young adults and internet users, and thus they were in a good position to acquire proper online information early enough about the virus that might be a plausible reason of having high knowledge in our study. Specifically, COVID-19 was first identified near the end of 2019, and this study collected the data during the first two weeks of April 2020. Online users became more aware of the exposure of international media since the start of the outbreak. During the early period of the outbreak, a study about KAP toward COVID-19 among the border population of northern Thailand (Srichan et al. 2020) showed that 73.4% had poor knowledge of disease prevention and control. Approximately 36.4 to 56.9% population was optimistic that Bangladesh would win the fight against COVID-19, where the percent of optimistic people in China (90.8%) and health workers in Vietnams (90%) was quite high (Huynh and (Zhong et al. 2020) . Almost everyone (91-100%) wore masks when they went outside the home except the housewife, with similar results seen in the Chinese population (98%) (Zhong et al. 2020) . We found gender, family income, educational level, occupation, source of information were associated with the knowledge score toward COVID-19, which is similar to the findings from several studies (Clements 2020; Erfani et al. 2020; Ferdous et al. 2020; Haque et al. 2020; Zhong et al. 2020 ). Srichan et al. stated age, but not gender was associated with knowledge in Thailand (Srichan et al. 2020 ). However, males (compared to females) were found with a higher knowledge score, which is in opposition to a study conducted in China (Zhong et al. 2020 ). This could be due to the higher participation of males with high education levels in our study, with previous studies reporting the association of education levels (Clements 2020; Erfani et al. 2020; Zhong et al. 2020) . Only half (51.7%) of the participants had confidence about Bangladesh's ability to overcome COVID-19, which was less than China (97.1%) (Zhong et al. 2020 ). This pessimistic response may be due to poor health care and quarantine facilities in Bangladesh. Furthermore, Bangladeshi citizens' negative mindset may be related to inadequate health care services, low COVID-19 testing rates, and lower economic conditions. On the other hand, the optimistic attitude of the Chinese residents could be related to the unprecedented COVID-19 control measures such as traffic limits and shutdowns in critical areas and available medical workers and materials in highly impacted areas (Zhong et al. 2020) . Almost half of the respondents were afraid of getting the virus at any time. This fear could be due to the apparent failures regarding the successful management of the pandemic (e.g., lack of appropriate and widespread testing facilities, shortage of PPE, etc.). In addition, Bangladesh citizens who were traveling abroad during the early stage of the pandemic neglected the home quarantine system and accelerated the outbreak. Also, the high density of the population makes it almost impossible to maintain social distancing in the food and medicine markets, which remained, and still remain, open during the shutdown period. Due to economic deprivation, many people in Bangladesh are being forced to go outside to get food. Approximately 80% of the health workers in Vietnam were afraid of getting sick at any time, this could be due to their thought of more proximity of health care professionals to the patients and closeness of study setting to COVID-19 origin country China (Huynh and Nguyen 2020) . More than half of our respondents denied accepting a previously infected person back into the community. This may be due to high levels of fear of becoming infected. Roy et al. reported that fear and stigma were associated with the return of recovered COVID-19 patients into mainstream society in India (Roy et al. 2020) . Authorities are now simultaneously working on these social disparities. Adequate awareness may minimize the stigma and facilitate acceptance in the general population. Most participants (94.1%) reported that social distancing is essential to stop the spreading of the virus. This could be due to the government and media emphasizing more preventive measures (Roy et al. 2020 ). In addition, knowledge regarding the high infectivity and transmission possibilities via invisible respiratory droplets places a lot of importance on physical distancing (Zhong et al. 2020 ). These positive attitudes should be key measures for effective management of COVID-19, especially in highly populated and low-health care-resourced countries such as Bangladesh. Our study found considerably positive practices toward COVID-19, which was supported by previous research on COVID-19 in China (Zhong et al. 2020 ) and on SARS in China (JIAO et al. 2005; Zhong et al. 2020 ). Most of the people took preventive measures against this infectious disease, such as refraining from public gatherings, wearing masks while going out, and disinfecting their hands upon coming back from outside or public excursions. People following these preventive practices may be due to the swift preventive and control measures taken by the local government, such as prohibiting public gatherings closing all educational institutions, and eventually locking down the whole country (WHO 2020f). In addition, following preventive practices could be a result of people's higher levels of knowledge about the infective nature of COVID-19. The present findings still showed that recently 11.27% of people went to crowded places, which is much higher than in China (3.6%) (Zhong et al. 2020) , and when outside, 3.4% of people did not wear masks. This discrepancy from other countries such as China may be due to the socio-economic conditions of both settings. Poor economic structures may force certain individuals to go outside as they have no other option to be physically separated from one another. This study also reported 12.2% did not sanitize their hands after sneezing or coughing or did not cover their mouth. Moreover, our study findings revealed that 1.3% and 17.2% did not disinfect their hands with soap and change clothes after returning from the outside, respectively. These unfavorable and poor practices were mainly related to males 26 to 30 years of age, married persons, unemployed persons, housewives, undergraduate students, those taking newspaper as a source of information, trained persons, and poor COVID-19 knowledge. This study found that males were more likely to have a lower score of practices toward COVID-19 as compared to females, which is similar to a previous study conducted in China (Zhong et al. 2020) . Earlier studies on age and gender variations of risk-taking behaviors reported male and late adolescents are more likely to be involved in risk-taking behaviors (Pawlowski et al. 2008; Cobey et al. 2013; Duell et al. 2018) . This might be a plausible explanation of poor practices toward COVID-19 among males in this study. The study showed a higher risk of developing poor practices toward this infection among the 26-30 age group (vs. > 30 years) and married (vs. unmarried), which might be due to their responsibilities to family members, children, and peers. Undergraduate students were more susceptible to undesired practices toward COVID-19 that could be important in the perspective of prevention management than that of masters' students; however, these risky practices might be due to their younger age. The higher odds of developing poor practices were found to be associated with the occupation of unemployment and housewife (vs. employment) and this finding is in line with the previous Bangladeshi study that assessed KAP toward COVID-19 among women (Anwar et al. 2020a) . Because most of the housewives in Bangladesh are underprivileged and disadvantaged due to cultural norms and values, they might be more unaware (Asaduzzaman et al. 2015) . In addition, most of the time, they are busy with household works that may hinder them to be updated via mass media and online platforms. Contrarily, unemployed individuals need to go outside as a means of livelihood, which might be resulting in these lower levels of practices. The risk of having a low score of practices was found to be higher among people who obtained information on COVID-19 from newspaper rather than television, as television is an effective learning and reliable medium for all kinds of information, which might be resulting knowledge into behaviors. It is worth mentioning that higher knowledge scores on COVID-19 were found to be significantly associated with a higher likelihood of positive practices toward the COVID-19 epidemic in this study area. To be noted, this study mostly includes the highly qualified participants in this setting, as over three-fourth of our responders had at least graduated from university. These results may only represent the higher-educated young adult individuals of Bangladesh. Therefore, they cannot be generalized to the whole population. Given the poor economic and educational profiles of this population, and previous findings of poor knowledge and attitudes toward disease prevention in a similar setting (Srichan et al. 2020) , a community-based study may represent more accurate results for this area. Finally, we did not explore the causality of going outside for some specific groups (which may have been necessary), which could affect the quarantine campaign for the prevention of COVID-19. Our study revealed that a higher knowledge score regarding COVID-19 was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of having a positive attitude and good practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. The attitudes of the participants are moderate, but appropriate and hygienic practices are lacking to control the outbreak, despite a reasonable understanding of COVID-19. The people of Bangladesh are very reluctant to follow government instructions such as improvement of personal hygiene and avoiding unnecessary movement. Considering the current COVID-19 situation, where the number of COVID-19 cases and deaths are increasing day by day, the government should extend and strengthen lockdown to reduce the unnecessary movements of people. Another issue is the potential stigma of the integration of recovered COVID-19 patients into the mainstream of society. Nearly one-third of all respondents and more than 40% of young and low-educated participants disagreed with allowing recovering patients to rejoin their communities. This implicates a higher level of fear among the community about the COVID-19 outbreak. The government should actively prevent stigmatization and discrimination against recovered COVID-19 patients. Mass awareness campaigns that target specific demographic groups such as housewives, youth, and people with less education may also change the attitudes and practices toward COVID-19. This study provides early evidence in understanding the knowledge, attitude, and practices of the public being online approachable during the pandemic in Bangladesh. College students' knowledge, attitudes and adherence to public service announcements on Ebola in Nigeria: suggestions for improving future Ebola prevention education programmes Bangladesh confirms first case of coronavirus Women's Knowledge, Attitude, and Perceptions Toward COVID-19 in Lower-Middle-Income Countries: A Representative Cross-Sectional Study in Bangladesh COVID-19 and Bangladesh: Challenges and how to address them Gender inequality in Bangladesh The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of the adult population in Bangladesh: a nationwide cross-sectional study Mental health difficulties of adults with COVID-19-like symptoms in Bangladesh: a crosssectional correlational study World Health Organization Working Group (2004) Prevention of international and community transmission of SARS spread Novel coronavirus (COVID-19) knowledge and perceptions: a survey on healthcare workers SARS risk perception, knowledge, precautions, and information sources, the Netherlands ?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc. gov%2Fcoronavirus%2F2019-ncov%2Fprepare%2Ftransmission. html. Accessed Perceived knowledge, attitude, and compliance with preventive behavior on influenza a (H1N1) by university students Knowledge and behaviors toward COVID-19 among US residents during the early days of the pandemic Sex differences in risk taking Could attitudes toward COVID-19 in Spain render men more vulnerable than women? Danger appraisals as prospective predictors of disgust and avoidance of contaminants Age patterns in risk taking across the world Note from the editors: World Health Organization declares novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) sixth public health emergency of international concern Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding COVID-19 outbreak in Bangladesh: an onlinebased cross-sectional study Knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) towards COVID-19 and assessment of risks of infection by SARS-CoV-2 among the Bangladeshi population: an online cross sectional survey Coronavirüs disease 2019: What we know Medical students' knowledge, perceptions, and behavioral intentions towards the H1N1 influenza, swine flu, in Pakistan: a brief report Knowledge and attitude toward COVID-19 among healthcare workers at District 2 Hospital IEDCR (2020) Covid-19 Status Bangladesh Survey of knowledge of villagers in prevention and control of SARS in Hainan Province Determinants of household food security and dietary diversity during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh What Is Coronavirus? Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia Sex differences in everyday r i s k The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak Study of knowledge, attitude, anxiety & perceived mental healthcare need in Indian population during COVID-19 pandemic Mental health outcomes of adults with comorbidity and chronic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic: a matched case-control study Mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 and perceptions towards the pandemic: findings from a cross sectional study among Bangladeshi students Coronavirus envelope protein: current knowledge Knowledge, attitude and preparedness to respond to the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) among the bordered population of Northern Thailand in the early period of the outbreak: a cross-sectional study The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education The impact of knowledge and attitudes on adherence to tuberculosis treatment: a casecontrol study in a Moroccan region SARS knowledge, perceptions, and behaviors: a comparison between Finns and the Dutch during the SARS outbreak in 2003 WHO (2020a) Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report -85 Emerging respiratory viruses, including COVID-19: methods for detection, prevention, response, and control WHO (2020d) WHO announces COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic -19)-update/coronavirus-disease-(covid-2019)-bangladesh-situationreports WHO (2020g) Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for the public WHO (2020h) WHO. Q&A on coronaviruses (COVID-19). 2020. Available from Who is afraid of the Ebola outbreak? The influence of discrete emotions on risk perception Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards COVID-19 among Chinese residents during the rapid rise period of the COVID-19 outbreak: a quick online crosssectional survey Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the participants. Availability of data and material The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.Code availability SPSS/SAS code is available upon request. Conflict of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this study. The study was performed in line with the principles of the declaration of Helsinki and followed the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) guidelines. The research protocol was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethical Committee (REC) of the Department of Food Microbiology, Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Bangladesh (Approval no: FMB:29/03/ 2020:01).J Public Health (Berl.): From Theory to Practice Consent to participate Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. The participants have consented to the submission of the study to the journal.