key: cord-0913418-bajge964 authors: Peñacoba, Cecilia; Velasco, Lilian; Catalá, Patricia; Gil‐Almagro, Fernanda; García‐Hedrera, Fernando J.; Carmona‐Monge, Francisco Javier title: Resilience and anxiety among intensive care unit professionals during the COVID‐19 pandemic date: 2021-07-28 journal: Nurs Crit Care DOI: 10.1111/nicc.12694 sha: 797406a0f97c2189eed2ee2044cd0f73182f5c5c doc_id: 913418 cord_uid: bajge964 BACKGROUND: The situation of the COVID‐19 global pandemic has generated an unprecedented state of emergency worldwide that has had a psychological impact on health care workers working in the ICU and this has created the need to implement different psychological strategies. AIM: This study explores (a) the prevalence of symptoms associated with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), (b) the relationship between GAD symptoms and resilience skills, and (c) which of the resilience skills were associated with a probable GAD among the ICU professionals during the COVID‐19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: Cross‐sectional survey design. METHODS: We explored anxiety and resilience in 448 ICU health care workers using an online survey. RESULTS: The participants showed high resilience levels and more than half of them presented symptoms consistent with a possible diagnosis of GAD. The GAD symptoms were more prevalent among women, nursing assistants, interns, staff who worked on rotation and health care workers who had to attend to more than 20 COVID patients. Significant negative correlations between resilience skills and GAD symptoms were found. The multiple regression analysis showed that resilience skills contribute to 14.4% of the variance for GAD symptoms. The binary logistic regression showed that the only skill that had a significant and negative predictive effect was “I usually take things in my stride” (OR = 0.774, 95% CI 0.67, 0.88; P = .000). This ability was the differentiating skill between professionals who equal or exceed the cut‐off point established for the diagnosis of a probable GAD regarding those who do not. CONCLUSION: ICU professionals developed symptoms consistent with a possible diagnosis of GAD due to their exposure to extremely stressful circumstances. However, resilience skills acted as a protective factor. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The importance of incorporating programmes that mitigate these psychological effects and to promote adaptive coping styles during pandemics has become a need after what ICU professionals have gone through. In December of 2019, an acute respiratory illness with unknown aetiology, named coronavirus disease (COVID- 19) , 1 Wuhan, China 2 and the World Health Organization officially declared this disease as a pandemic in March 2020, 3 causing the worst public health crisis in a generation. 4 Spain had one of the highest burdens of COVID-19 worldwide and hospitals created emergency committees that included using containment measures, the opening of hospital rooms and intensive care units, the reorganization of psychiatric wards, and even the use of hotels as hospital facilities. 5 Health workers throughout the entire world were more likely to come in contact with COVID-19 carriers, putting them at a greater risk of contracting the infection and spreading it to others. 5, 6 They were stretched to the point of exhaustion. Hospitals' intensive care units became saturated within a few weeks, and other departments had to be reorganized to receive COVID-19 patients. The critical care community had to increase their capacity by expanding into other areas, upscaling the number of ICU beds and necessary resources required to treat these patients as early as possible, increase labour resources, and enhance infection control practices. 7, 8 The psychological pressure on health care professionals in the face of the catastrophic health emergency and the high transmission rates has caused great psychological distress. 6, [9] [10] [11] Furthermore, dealing with traumatic patient experiences and the unexpected loss of family, friends and colleagues has lead these professionals to exhibit high rates of psychiatric morbidity and several mental health problems. 6, [12] [13] [14] The disruption of routine clinical practice, the sense of loss of control and the subsequent fear of potential destabilization of the health services, has provoked post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), depression and stress disorders among health care professionals, 5-6,10,15-16 a feature which is not uncommon of epidemics. 17 However, not all subjects exposed to traumatic events develop psychological problems or mental disorders. 18 Along with vulnerability factors, we find personality and external factors such as social and interpersonal resources that act as protective factors like optimism, social support and resilience. [19] [20] Resilience is an individual's capacity to deal with significant adversity and to quickly recover and it has been shown to help to protect individuals against mental illness. [21] [22] It is the What is known about the topic • The unprecedented public health emergency crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic has affected intensive care unit professionals revealing a high prevalence of psychological impact causing stress, depression and anxiety. • This pandemic, unlike any prior disaster, has been a traumatic experience for health care workers and especially for ICU professionals, causing several psychological consequences. • Along with the negative impact, some people use protective factors, such as resilience, to cope with psychological trauma and reduce mental health problems. • In this study, the prevalence of symptoms consistent with a possible diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder confirms the psychological impact and the challenge that health care professionals faced during the pandemic. • Anxiety symptoms were more prevalent among women, nursing assistants, interns, staff who worked on rotation and health care workers who had to attend to more than 20 COVID patients. • Resilience skills were protective factors against anxiety, and the ability to take things in stride has been shown to be the most protective skill against the development of anxiety. • Health care professionals, not only from ICU departments, should be able to learn strategies that will reduce anxiety and promote resilience. • The organizations and institutions should provide psychological support for health care workers during emergency crises. • Strengthening the mental health conditions of health care workers and establish protocols may help to face this type of emergency situations. • Future research should be aimed at strengthening the mental health conditions of health care workers and establishing protocols for facing this type of emergency situations. ability to bounce back or cope successfully despite adverse circumstances and has been referred to as a dynamic process of positive adaptation to stress, involving dynamic interactions between personal and environmental factors and resources. 23 Researchers have identified resilience as a protective factor against the development of PTSD after life challenges, exposure to a serious stressor and disasters. 24 In the face of COVID-19, there was a need to cope with ongoing stressors whilst managing to keep psychological distress at a minimum. This pandemic is unlike any prior disaster and has been a traumatic experience for health care workers and especially for ICU professionals, causing psychological disorders. [25] [26] But along with the negative impact, some people are able to take advantage of protective factors, such as resilience, to cope with psychological trauma and reduce mental health problems. 24 Due to the interest in studying the psychological impact caused by COVID-19 and also to discover the protective factors for ICU professionals, this study aimed to explore the following: (a) the prevalence of symptoms associated with GAD; (b) the relationship between GAD symptoms and resilience skills; and (c) which of the resilience skills were associated with a probable GAD among the ICU professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. A cross-sectional survey design was used. Data collection was performed using an online electronic form designed for this purpose by the research team. On the first sheet of the questionnaire the aim of the study was presented, along with the informed consent form, which the participant had to sign. A non-probabilistic convenience sampling method was followed and the link to the questionnaires was sent to health care professionals within the Spanish health system who had been in contact with COVID-19 patients. The link also circulated on social media (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn) and emails were sent to ICU health professionals from hospitals all over the country, when these were available on the website. For the current study, doctors, nurses and nursing assistants who had worked in the reanimation and critical care units between the months of March and May of 2020 were invited to participate. In this time, Spain was facing the first wave of the pandemic. The study was approved by the Ethics and clinical research committee of the hospital (Reference: 2088) and all participants signed the informed consent form before starting the questionnaire. The current study is supported by the Spanish Society for Intensive Nursing and Coronary Units. Participants were asked general personal information such as age, gender, education level, marital status, professional category, working status within the hospital, number of COVID patients they were attending, whether they had been moved to the ICU or worked there permanently, ratio of patient/health care worker, workload during the pandemic and average working hours per week. The Spanish version of the generalized anxiety disorder screener (GAD-7) 29 was administered. It assesses anxiety symptoms that are scored using a four-point Likert scale from 0 "Not at all" to 3 "Nearly every day" generating a total score ranging from 0 to 21. The maximum score is 21 and the cut-off point, which corresponds to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders algorithm, is 8, although a score greater than or equal to 9 and even 10 are better indicators of anxiety disorders. This instrument has been frequently used and validated as a brief screening tool among various populations for anxiety. 30 In the present sample Cronbach's alpha was.91. Finally, a binary logistic regression was performed to analyse the predictive influence of resilience skills on a possible GAD diagnosis according to the most critical cut-off point, according to the theory (scores ≥10) (yes/no). The level of significance was set at P ≤ .05. In every case, the inclusion criteria for the variables in the multivariate analysis were of P (Wald) <.20 in the univariate regressions. 31 The health care professionals from our sample presented a mean GAD-7 score of 10.96 (SD = 5.60), ranging between 0 and 21. Taking a score of 10 as cut-off, it was found that 58.7% (n = 263) presented symptoms consistent with a possible diagnosis of GAD. In relation to the sociodemographic profile, statistically significant negative correlations were found between GAD-7 and age, experience in the same position at work and average hours during the work week (see Table 1 ). Statistically significant differences were found in relation to the position at work, with nursing assistants scoring higher than physicians and nurses in the GAD-7. Regarding working status at the hospital, statistically significant differences were found, finding higher scores for interns than for permanent workers. Statistically significant differences were also found in relation to shifts, with higher scores among staff who worked on rotation in comparison to others working shifts + oncall, and 12/24 shifts. In relation to the number of COVID patients under their care, significantly higher scores were found among health care workers who had to attend to more than 20 COVID patients in comparison to those who had fewer (See Table 1 ). T A B L E 1 Socio-demographic and work status differences on GAD-7 T A B L E 3 Multiple regression predicting symptoms consistent with possible general anxiety disorder a from resilience skills Step Data reported are the resilience skills entered into the regression equation. *P < .05. **P < .01. ***P < .001. P = .406) or due to patient ratio (higher than usual/same as usual) (t = À1.146, gl = 446, P = .252). As shown in Regarding the correlations between anxiety symptoms and resilience, GAD-7 scores correlate significant and negatively with global resilience and with acceptance of oneself and life. No significant correlations were found for personal competence. Regarding each of the skills independently, significant correlations were found for seven of them. All these correlations were negative, except for "I remain interested in things" (see Table 2 ). Afterwards, based on the observed correlations, and including them as independent variables, we conducted a multiple regression analysis (forward step model) with the total score of the GAD-7 as the dependent variable. The final model showed a total of four resilience skills that contribute to 14.4% of the variance for a possible generalized anxiety disorder. These four skills refer to being able to take things in stride, to belief in oneself through hard times, to believe life has meaning and to take interest in things, the latter is the only one with a positive beta value (Table 3) . Finally, aiming to explore the predictive variables for symptoms consistent with possible GAD, and according to the clinical cut-off (scores ≥10), a binary logistic regression analysis was performed. The results showed that the only skill that had a significant and negative predictive effect was "I usually take things in my stride" (OR = 0.774, 95% CI 0.67, 0.88; P = .000) (see Table 4 ). The emerging literature of the psychological impact on health care workers during the COVID-19 outbreak has revealed a high incidence of psychological disorders among medical staff. 26, 32 In the present study, we found that 58.7% of the health professionals presented symptoms consistent with possible GAD. Systematic reviews 6 and multicentre studies 10 show the impact that this pandemic has had on health professionals, contributing to significantly increase levels of anxiety and depression. However, previous studies also agree that these levels, despite being significantly high, are not as high as those found in the general population during the pandemic. 6,10 A possible explanation for this fact could be the high levels of resilience found in health care workers, as our results have shown and indicated by previous studies that additionally reveal that physicians exhibited higher levels of resilience than the general working population. 33 In Spain, the studies carried out are consistent with our findings, where health care professionals present percentages of anxiety that affect between the 32 and 58% of the workers during the pandemic. 5, 34 Lázaro et al 35 found that although the pandemic has had a global impact, the consequences have been different depending on the country, and in Spain, in particular, health professionals had to face, in a short period of time, a working environment with overcrowded hospitals, an increase in mortality, contradictory or nonexistent protocols and a lack of individual protection equipment. These conditions along with health emergencies and death of their patients led to high levels of anxiety and stress. 35 Staff not only had to face caring for patients with a contagious and life-threatening illness, they also experienced several stressful factors that could increase anxiety in the face of an overwhelming situation, and in most cases whilst having limited resources. 35 In addition, the increased risk of exposure to the virus produced fear among health care workers, believing they may contract COVID-19 themselves. 4 In this study, women showed more anxiety than men; specifically, had a higher incidence of anxiety than physicians. 32 Previous studies have also reported higher levels of psychological and psychiatric morbidity, like anxiety, in nursing assistants in Spain, [35] [36] Brazil 37 and Nigeria. 38 In a similar manner, other studies have found that ICU nurses in the United Kingdom display a greater incidence of being at risk of psychiatric morbidity than doctors. 39 In accordance with our results, the profile of professionals with symptoms consistent with a possible diagnosis of GAD are those who are younger, with less work experience, who work fewer hours, who have temporary jobs, who work on rotation and who have to care for more than 20 COVID patients. In this same line, Erquicia et al 34 In this context, to remain interested in things should be highlighted, as it is predictive of a possible diagnosis of GAD. A possible explanation could be that this interest in things could lead to negative emotions, fears and worries due to the unexpectedness of the emergency situation, the sensation of learned helplessness and the feelings generated due to the suffering and isolation of the patients. This concept has been widely studied and it is known as compassion fatigue, it occurs when the professionals are overinvolved with patients, which can interfere with their objectivity, efficiency and their emotional balance. 42 It generates a state of exhaustion and dysfunction that emerges as a result of prolonged, intense and repeated exposure to disease and suffering. 43 There are different studies that explore the prevalence of depression This study confirmed the presence of vulnerability and protective factors in response to COVID-19 in a sample of ICU professionals. On the one hand, the prevalence of GAD symptoms confirms the psychological impact and the challenge that health care professionals faced during the pandemic. Although health care professionals showed high levels of resilience, more than half of them presented a possible GAD. The ability to take things in stride has been shown to be the most protective skill against the development of anxiety. To remain interested in things, on the other hand, has been shown to be maladaptive in the specific circumstances created by the COVID emergency; this could be due to the feelings among health care professionals of helplessness and the consequent development of compassion fatigue. We are grateful to all participants for giving their time so generously. The raw data supporting the conclusions of this manuscript will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation, to any qualified researcher. The study was approved by the Ethics and clinical research committee of the hospital (Reference: 2088) and all participants signed the informed consent form before starting the questionnaire. The current study is supported by the Spanish Society for Intensive Nursing and Coronary Units (SEEIUC). Lilian Velasco https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6787-324X Fernanda Gil-Almagro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1079-281X Francisco Javier Carmona-Monge https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3431-238X Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan A cross-sectional comparison of epidemiological and clinical features of patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Wuhan and outside Wuhan COVID-19) outbreak Situation COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on mental health of healthcare professionals Symptoms of posttraumatic stress, anxiety, depression, levels of resilience and burnout in Spanish health personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic Impact of SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) on the mental health of healthcare professionals: a systematic review The ventilator management team: repurposing anesthesia workstations and personnel to combat COVID-19 Enhancing intensive care capacity: COVID-19 experience from a Tertiary Center in Israel The resilience of the Spanish health system against the COVID-19 pandemic Mental health among medical professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic in eight European countries: cross-sectional survey study Psychological distress among healthcare professionals involved in the Covid-19 emergency: vulnerability and resilience factors Study of the mental health status of medical personnel dealing with new coronavirus pneumonia Psychological health during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic outbreak COVID-19: emerging compassion, courage and resilience in the face of misinformation and adversity Managing mental health challenges faced by healthcare workers during covid-19 pandemic Supporting clinicians during the COVID-19 pandemic Psychological impact of the 2015 MERS outbreak on hospital workers and quarantined hemodialysis patients Risk of post-traumatic stress disorder in 111 survivors the 2009 Viareggio (Italy) Rail Crash: the role of mood spectrum comorbidity Optimism and death Can people benefit from acute stress? Social support, psychological improvement, and resilience after the Virginia Tech campus shootings Psychological resilience Understanding the influence of resilience for people with a lived experience of mental illness: a self-determination theory perspective Resilience and mental health nursing: an integrative review of international literature Loss, trauma, and human resilience: have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? Mental distress and influencing factors in nurses caring for patients with COVID-19 The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and implications for clinical practice Escala de resiliencia 14 ítems (RS-14): propiedades psicométricas de la versi on en español The Resilience Scale User's Guide for the US English Version of the Resilience Scale and the 14-Item Resilience Scale Screening for generalized anxiety disorder in Spanish primary care centers with the GAD-7 Validation and standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the general population Introduction to the logistic regression model. Applied Logistic Regression Mental health care for medical staff in China during the COVID-19 outbreak Resilience and burnout among physicians and the general US working population Emotional impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on healthcare workers in one of the most important infection outbreaks in Europe Anxiety about the risk of death of their patients in health professionals in Spain: analysis at the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic Psychosocial and physiological risks of shift work in nurses: a cross-sectional study Nursing professionals' anxiety and feelings in terminal situations in oncology A comparative study of burnout syndrome among health professionals in a Nigerian teaching hospital Psychological rumination and recovery from work in intensive care professionals: associations with stress, burnout, depression and health Age differences in emotional responses to daily stress: the role of timing, severity, and global perceived stress Emotions experienced at event recall and the self: implications for the regulation of self-esteem, selfcontinuity and meaningfulness To be or not to be empathic: the combined role of empathic concern and perspective taking in understanding burnout in general practice Prevalence and predictors of compassion fatigue, burnout and compassion satisfaction among oncology nurses: a cross-sectional survey Resilience and anxiety among intensive care unit professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic