key: cord-0911071-vkv69a89 authors: Perkmann, Thomas; Koller, Thomas; Perkmann-Nagele, Nicole; Klausberger, Miriam; Duerkop, Mark; Holzer, Barbara; Hartmann, Boris; Mucher, Patrick; Radakovics, Astrid; Ozsvar-Kozma, Maria; Wagner, Oswald F.; Binder, Christoph J.; Haslacher, Helmuth title: Spike Protein Antibodies Mediate the Apparent Correlation between SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Antibodies and Neutralization Test Results date: 2021-06-16 journal: Microbiology spectrum DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00218-21 sha: a7b71f83c21a69998918c4b4aac50dc027a27d37 doc_id: 911071 cord_uid: vkv69a89 nan as neutralizing antibodies. Whereas antibodies against the viral spike protein, which contains the receptor-binding domain (RBD), are known to have neutralizing properties (1) (2) (3) (4) , some authors have also shown that antibodies against the nucleocapsid protein (NC) correlate with neutralization activity (5) . However, these structures are not present on the viral surface (2, 6, 7) . Consequently, it has been hypothesized that these are mere spurious correlations mediated by the cooccurrence of antibodies to RBD (2, 8) . To prove this hypothesis, we measured levels of antibodies binding to the NC and the S antigens in 64 individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (9) by various CE-labeled immunoassays (Roche total antibody NC electrochemiluminescence immunoassay [ECLIA], Abbott IgG NC chemiluminescent microparticle assay [CMIA], Technozym RBD IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA], and DiaSorin S1/S2 IgG chemiluminescence assay [CLIA]). The functional ability of sera to neutralize SARS-CoV-2 was tested using a classical 50% tissue culture infectious dose assay (neutralization tests [NT]) as previously described (10) . Recruiting procedures, preanalytical workflows, and analytical methods were reported earlier (9, 11, 12) . Both tested assays assessing antibodies against the NC correlated significantly with NT titers: Abbott, r = 0.742, P = 2.2 Â 10 212 ; Roche, r = 0.365, P = 0.003. However, if the rank correlations were controlled for RBD antibody presence, correlation coefficients dropped to r = 0.318 (P = 0.011; Abbott) and r = 0.032 (P = 0.806; Roche). The same holds if antibodies against an S1/S2 combination antigen were kept constant: r = 0.329 (P = 0.008; Abbott), r = 20.101 (P = 0.430; Roche). When RBD or S1/S2 antibody concentrations were not considered, up to 55% of NT titer variability could be explained by NC antibody concentrations (Abbott) (Fig. 1) . In a last step, we aimed to assess whether the correlation between RBD antibody concentrations and NT titers could be attenuated to the same extent by keeping NC antibody concentrations constant. Although controlling for Abbott NC IgG levels affected the coefficients of determination, the remaining R 2 was still 0.31 for S1/S2 and 0.35 for RBD antibodies (Fig. 2) . Our data suggest that the relationship between NC antibody levels and NT titers is only apparent and is mostly mediated by the concomitant presence of RBD or S1/S2 antibodies. Specific S antibody concentrations and NT titers remain correlated after keeping NC antibody levels constant. In contrast, the correlation between NC antibody levels and NT titers nearly vanished for most of the assessed test systems after keeping RBD or S1/S2 antibody levels constant. This was especially true for Roche NC assay measured total NC antibody levels, whereas the IgG-based assays appeared to correlate better with NT titers. The remaining weak correlation between the Abbott test results and the NT titers, while keeping RBD or S1/S2 IgG antibody concentrations constant, suggests that a third mediator variable is present. To prevent falsely implied causal relationships between SARS-CoV-2-specific NC antibodies and neutralizing activity, all correlation analyses of non-spike-associated antibody assays and neutralization assays should include partial correlation analyses to exclude a possible mediator effect of spike-associated antibodies. In addition, clinicians should be aware of the noncausality of correlations between antinucleocapsid antibodies and neutralization test titers when interpreting laboratory findings. This study was conducted in cooperation with the MedUni Wien Biobank facility. We thank all sample donors for their contribution as well as Manuela Repl and Marika Gerdov for perfect technical assistance. Technozym RBD ELISA kits were kindly provided by the manufacturer (Technclone). Data will be made available in compliance with the Austrian Data Protection Legislation and the GDPR to interested researchers upon request. Structural basis of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV antibody interactions Evaluation of high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 serological assays in a longitudinal cohort of patients with mild COVID-19: clinical sensitivity, specificity and association with virus neutralization test Multicenter evaluation of the clinical performance and the neutralizing antibody activity prediction properties of 10 high-throughput serological assays used in clinical laboratories Association between SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies and commercial serological assays Assessment of S1, S2 and NCP-specific IgM, IgA, and IgG antibody kinetics in acute SARS-CoV-2 infection by a microarray and twelve other immunoassays Anti-spike, anti-nucleocapsid and neutralizing antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 inpatients and asymptomatic individuals Association between SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies and commercial serological assays Heterogeneous antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor binding domain and nucleocapsid with implications for COVID-19 immunity Side-by-side comparison of three fully automated SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays with a focus on specificity A comprehensive antigen production and characterisation study for easy-to-implement, specific and quantitative SARS-CoV-2 serotests Increasing both specificity and sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests by using an adaptive orthogonal testing approach Usage data and scientific impact of the prospectively established fluid bioresources at the hospital-based MedUni Wien Biobank