key: cord-0910099-9udb4djk authors: Krishnamoorthy, Parasuram; Croft, Lori B; Ro, Richard; Anastasius, Malcolm; Zhao, Wenli; Giustino, Gennaro; Argulian, Edgar; Goldman, Martin E; Sharma, Samin K; Kini, Annapoorna; Lerakis, Stamatios title: Biventricular strain by speckle tracking echocardiography in COVID-19: findings and possible prognostic implications date: 2020-08-04 journal: Future cardiology DOI: 10.2217/fca-2020-0100 sha: c039e2ea7cf0e6b9ae0a45e54fff78b3cea085aa doc_id: 910099 cord_uid: 9udb4djk The COVID-19 infection adversely affects the cardiovascular system. Transthoracic echocardiography has demonstrated diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic utility. We report biventricular myocardial strain in COVID-19. Methods: Biventricular strain measurements were performed for 12 patients. Patients who were discharged were compared with those who needed intubation and/or died. Results: Seven patients were discharged and five died or needed intubation. Right ventricular strain parameters were decreased in patients with poor outcomes compared with those discharged. Left ventricular strain was decreased in both groups but was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Right ventricular strain was decreased in patients with poor outcomes and left ventricular strain was decreased regardless of outcome. Right ventricular strain measurements may be important for risk stratification and prognosis. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings. The COVID-19 infection, which occurs as a result of infection with the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, has firmly established itself as a pandemic that has permeated every aspect of our lives. SARS-CoV-2 is a single-strand RNA virus that gains entry into cells by binding ACE2 [1] . It affects multiple organ systems, including the cardiovascular system. Elevated cardiac biomarkers (e.g., troponins and BNP), heart failure, arrhythmias, myocarditis and acute coronary syndromes have been described in the literature, with the underlying mechanisms thought to be, among others, direct viral injury, increased cardiac stress secondary to hypoxemia, systemic inflammation and a prothrombotic state [2, 3] . Various diagnostic and management strategies addressing all the affected organ systems have been proposed and investigated. The foundation of diagnostic cardiac imaging remains transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), a portable and useful imaging modality that is recommended for patients with COVID-19 when it may provide relevant information impacting clinical management [4] . Both right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) systolic function and diastolic function can be evaluated, with RV dysfunction seen most commonly in patients with clinical deterioration [5, 6] . 32-55% of patients have been reported to have normal transthoracic echocardiograms [5, 7] . In critically ill patients, TTE can quickly ascertain hemodynamic status and impact a patient's therapeutic course [8, 9] . Despite these findings that can be obtained, thought leaders have recommended screening the appropriateness of studies, suggested workflow adjustments and encouraged focused examinations in order to minimize exposure time [10] . Myocardial strain measurement by speckle-tracking echocardiography, which can measure LV global longitudinal strain (LVGLS), RV free wall strain (RVFWS) and RV global strain (RVGS), plays a diagnostic and prognostic clinical role in several cardiac diseases and provides objective quantification of biventricular myocardial deformation and dynamics [11] [12] [13] . A recent study reported the prognostic capability of RVFWS in a large Chinese cohort affected by COVID-19, but examination of the effect on both ventricles was beyond the scope of the investigation [14] . Given the unfortunate volume of patients seen in our institution in New York City, an epicenter of COVID-19, we sought to determine whether the combination of LVGLS, RVFWS and RVGS is affected by COVID-19 infection and is associated with adverse outcomes such as death or need of intubation and mechanical ventilation. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. TTEs were performed based on American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) guidelines, with tailoring of image acquisition according to the specific test indication [4, 15] . All TTEs were reviewed by two expert echocardiographers and only patients with optimal visualization of both ventricles were included in the study. Apical three-chamber, two-chamber and four-chamber views were used for LVGLS and an RV-focused four-chamber view was used for RVFWS and RVGS. If all four of these views were obtained with optimal visualization, these patients were identified as candidates for biventricular strain measurement. Measurements were performed offline using QLab 13.0 (Philips, Best, the Netherlands). Two patients had their TTE performed before ultimately being intubated, while two had their studies after clinical decompensation requiring intubation. All patients but one were on anticoagulation therapy and no patients had documented pulmonary embolism (either through clinical suspicion or computed tomography angiography). Demographic data were collected, as well as pertinent laboratory parameters, including white blood cell count and differential. Biochemical markers such as CRP, D-dimer, troponin and BNP were also collected [16] . Categorical variables were presented as percentage (%); continuous variables as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for normally distributed variables and median (interquartile range [IQR]) for others. Student t-test, Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests were performed to examine differences between the groups. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 14.0 MP (StataCorp LP, TX, USA). From 103 clinically appropriate TTEs performed on hospitalized COVID-19 patients, 12 (12%) were of adequate quality for biventricular speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) analysis and were included in this single-center, retrospective study. We compared the prevalence of demographic, laboratory, biochemical and inflammatory markers and echocardiographic parameters between patients who required intubation and/or died and those who survived to discharge (Table 1) . Four patients died while intubated from hypoxic respiratory failure, most likely secondary to acute respiratory distress syndrome and another died suddenly prior to intubation due to arrhythmia. RV and LV dysfunction were reported in 41.7% and 58.3% of patients, respectively. Both mean RVGS and RVFWS were significantly decreased in the patients who had poor outcomes compared with those who did not; the mean RVGS and RVFWS were -10.2 ± 3.7% versus -20.3 ± 6.1% (p = 0.007) and -9.8 ± 3.8% versus -21.5 ± 6.5% (p = 0.007), respectively. The mean LVGLS was severely low, but similar, in both groups at -11.9 ± 4.6% and -11.95 ± 4.5%. BNP levels were available for 11 of the 12 patients at the time of hospital presentation; while those who had poorer clinical outcomes had a numerically higher median BNP level compared with patients who survived to discharge, the difference was not significantly different (553.1pg/ml [IQR: 3226.1] vs 20.5pg/ml [IQR: 2103.0], respectively; p = 0.8). There was no correlation between BNP and RVFWS (R 2 0.03; p = 0.6) or RVGS (R 2 0.2; p = 0.2) No significant difference was observed in the pulmonary artery systolic pressure measured by TTE. To our knowledge, this is the first study in the literature evaluating biventricular mechanics by simultaneous LV and RV strain imaging in COVID-19 patients. We report firstly that, while we were able to measure biventricular mechanics in only 12% of all TTEs performed in our hospital for COVID-19 patients, both RVGS and RVFWS were significantly decreased in patients with poor outcomes; and secondly that LVGLS was severely decreased in all patients regardless of their outcome (either survival to discharge or death) and/or requirement for endotracheal intubation. The mean LVGLS was -11.93% ± 4.2 in all studied patients, which has not been described before in the literature. In contrast, the mean LVGLS in normal patients using the Philips software platform was reported to be 18.8%, with a lower limit (two SDs) of 15.2% [17] . While LVGLS was decreased in all patients, RVGS and RVFWS were only significantly decreased in patients with adverse outcomes. The reduced RV strain measurements in the patients with poor outcomes are likely multifactorial in etiology; they may be due to more advanced baseline pulmonary disease, worse hypoxemia, pulmonary vasoconstriction and afterload mismatch. However, there was no significant difference in the pulmonary artery systolic pressures in the two groups. In a recent study, Li et al. measured only RVFWS and showed that it was a powerful predictor of mortality. They described that patients in the lowest tertile of RVGS (-10.3% to -20.5%) had a higher percentage of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS; 52.5%) and death (32.5%) [14] . We also found that RVGS, in addition to RVFWS, were severely decreased in patients who needed intubation and/or died. Because the LVGLS in all of our studied patients were severely reduced, one would have expected that RVGS, which includes the ventricular septum, would have been decreased in both groups as well; however, this was not the case. This is an interesting observation and is hypothesis generating: is it possible that the response to COVID-19 is different in the two ventricles and that a higher inflammatory burden is required for the RV mechanics to be affected and eventually result in poor outcomes? Further study is required to better elucidate this. This study has a number of significant limitations, most notably the small sample size. Additionally, this was a single-center study and a high percentage of cases had inadequate imaging for STE analysis. Thus the findings are more hypothesis generating. TTEs were performed using a limited protocol for safety reasons, primarily to limit duration of sonographer exposure to patients with COVID-19 infection. This is in line with the recommendations of major cardiovascular societies [17] . Therefore only 12% of studies had suitable imaging for biventricular STE analysis. Factors such as endotracheal intubation, high positive end-expiratory pressures with mechanical ventilation, patient positioning and body habitus limited the image quality for strain analysis. For example, the mean body mass index in our cohort was 28.2 ± 6.5, while the mean in the study by Li et al. was 23.7 ± 3.0 [14] . These factors can result in a significant selection bias; patients with acceptable echocardiographic windows may have had a lower body mass index or may have been able to position themselves better as they were less symptomatic and had a less severe disease process secondary to COVID-19. In patients with COVID-19 infection, LV global longitudinal strain, RV global strain and free wall strain were altered. This became more apparent when dividing our cohort into patients who survived to discharge and those who had adverse outcomes. In the acute setting, off-line measurements of RVGS and RVFWS may be important tools for risk stratification and prognosis of COVID-19 patients. Moving forward and especially in the setting of a second wave of COVID-19 infection, routine measurement of these parameters may be useful in risk stratifying patients and guiding clinical management. In addition, the effect of investigational therapies such as convalescent plasma, remdesivir, tocilizumab and others on these parameters will be of great interest. With increased availability of personal protective equipment to protect our echocardiography staff, we believe that more optimal imaging can be achieved for biventricular strain analysis in COVID-19 patients. Further studies with larger patient sample size will be needed to confirm and expand on our findings. • COVID-19 is a viral infection with widespread effects, particularly for the cardiovascular system. • Myocardial strain imaging by speckle tracking echocardiography has prognostic implications in a number of conditions. • Biventricular myocardial strain has not been previously evaluated in COVID-19 infection. • Global left ventricular strain is abnormal in COVID-19 patients, with a mean left ventricular global longitudinal strain of 11.93% ± 4.2. • Right ventricular global strain and free wall strain are significantly decreased in patients with adverse outcomes compared with patients who were discharged home without needing endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation (-10.2 ± 3.7% vs -20.3 ± 6.1 [p = 0.007] and -9.8 ± 3.8% vs -21.5 ± 6.5% [p = 0.007], respectively). • Myocardial strain may provide prognostic information in patients afflicted with COVID-19. • This will require further study with larger sample sizes. Financial & competing interests disclosure Structure, function and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein COVID-19 for the cardiologist: a current review of the virology, clinical epidemiology, cardiac and other clinical manifestations and potential therapeutic strategies COVID-19 and the heart comprehensive review of cardiac manifestations of COVID-19 ASE statement on protection of patients and echocardiography service providers during the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak Society of Echocardiography statement during the COVID-19 pandemic The spectrum of cardiac manifestations in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) -a systematic echocardiographic study Right ventricular dilation in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection Global evaluation of echocardiography in patients with COVID-19 Epub ahead of print) future science group Using echocardiography to guide the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia Bedside focused cardiac ultrasound in COVID-19 infection from the Wuhan epicenter: the role of cardiac point-of-care ultrasound, limited transthoracic echocardiography and critical care echocardiography Echocardiography in the time of COVID-19 A test in context: myocardial strain measured by speckle-tracking echocardiography Recommendations for cardi.ac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging Standardization of left atrial, right ventricular and right atrial deformation imaging using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: a consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging Prognostic value of right ventricular longitudinal strain in patients with COVID-19 ASE statement on point-of-care ultrasound during the 2019 novel coronavirus pandemic Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study Research to practice: assessment of left ventricular global longitudinal strain for surveillance of cancer chemotherapeutic-related cardiac dysfunction The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript. The authors state that they have obtained appropriate institutional review board approval or have followed the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki for all human or animal experimental investigations. In addition, for investigations involving human subjects, informed consent has been obtained from the participants involved.