key: cord-0901481-t9dfj33p
authors: Babina, Ksenia; Salikhova, Dilara; Polyakova, Maria; Svitich, Oxana; Samoylikov, Roman; Ahmad El-Abed, Samya; Zaytsev, Alexandr; Novozhilova, Nina
title: The Effect of Oral Probiotics (Streptococcus Salivarius k12) on the Salivary Level of Secretory Immunoglobulin A, Salivation Rate, and Oral Biofilm: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial
date: 2022-03-07
journal: Nutrients
DOI: 10.3390/nu14051124
sha: 3b62f2967bbb708a29c71b056e58b624a05aedac
doc_id: 901481
cord_uid: t9dfj33p

We aimed to assess the effect of oral probiotics containing the Streptococcus salivarius K12 strain on the salivary level of secretory immunoglobulin A, salivation rate, and oral biofilm. Thirty-one consenting patients meeting the inclusion criteria were recruited in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-arm, parallel-group study and randomly divided into probiotic (n = 15) and placebo (n = 16) groups. Unstimulated salivation rate, concentration of salivary secretory immunoglobulin A, Turesky index, and Papillary-Marginal-Attached index were assessed after 4 weeks of intervention and 2 weeks of washout. Thirty patients completed the entire study protocol. We found no increase in salivary secretory immunoglobulin A levels and salivary flow rates in the probiotic group compared with placebo. Baseline and outcome salivary secretory immunoglobulin A concentrations (mg/L) were 226 ± 130 and 200 ± 113 for the probiotic group and 205 ± 92 and 191 ± 97 for the placebo group, respectively. A significant decrease in plaque accumulation was observed in the probiotic group at 4 and 6 weeks. Within the limitations of the present study, it may be concluded that probiotic intake (Streptococcus salivarius K12) does not affect salivation rates and secretory immunoglobulin A salivary levels but exhibits a positive effect on plaque accumulation. Trial registration NCT05039320. Funding: none.

The oral cavity harbors the second largest microbiome in the human body. This microbial community, hosting over 700 species [1] , is based on the interactions of microorganisms with the host environment as well as on their interaction with each other [2] . A healthy oral cavity is characterized by a dynamic balance between commensal (i.e., non-infectious) and opportunistic (cariogenic) microorganisms. This equilibrium can be disturbed by a high-carbohydrate diet, poor oral hygiene, some medications, and systemic diseases [3] . Dental caries, the most common non-communicable disease worldwide [4] , are primarily caused by an imbalance in the oral microbiome, i.e., a predominance of cariogenic microorganisms, including various types of streptococci and lactobacilli, actinomyces, bacteroides, and bifidobacteria [5] . In this regard, the replacement of the cariogenic microorganisms with nose and throat) inflammatory diseases [35] , halitosis [36] , candidiasis [37] , and dental caries [38] [39] [40] . Among the S. salivarius-containing probiotics, the two most promising strains are K12 and M18 [31] .

Despite a large number of studies, there is still no consensus on the ways in which probiotics affect dental health indicators. Moreover, there is a paucity of literature on the use of S. salivarius (particularly K12 strain) as a probiotic for dental purposes. The aim of our study is to assess the effect of oral probiotics containing Streptococcus salivarius K12 strain on the salivary level of secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA), salivation rate, and oral biofilm.

This clinical study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee (Protocol no. 34-20 (9 December 2020)) and registered on clinicaltrials.gov registry NCT05039320). This research received no external funding. The trial was designed following the principles of the modified Helsinki's code for human clinical studies (2013) and the CONSORT 2010 guidelines for reporting randomized clinical trials.

The study assessed the effect of oral probiotics containing Streptococcus salivarius K12 on oral biofilm, salivation rate, and secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) salivary level. A double-blind, randomized, two-arm parallel-group study was conducted from September 2021 to November 2021.

General visit descriptions and study schedule are presented in Table 1 . 

The patients visiting the Dental Institute were invited to participate in the study. Thirty-one healthy adult volunteers aged 20-24 years were enrolled and assigned to interventions by one of the study authors (DS). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients for participation in the study and publication of the data for research and education purposes. The patients were recommended to brush their teeth using standardized technique (Bass) and pea-sized amount of toothpaste without any antibacterial or antiplaque components twice daily. 

Subjects who met all inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were randomized to one of the following study groups: Group 1 received lozenges containing a probiotic (Streptococcus salivarius K12); Group 2 received placebo lozenges. The allocation concealment was performed using containers numbered by a "third party" (person who did not participate in the study). The lozenges in unlabeled bottles were placed in the containers. The probiotics and placebo lozenges were identical in taste, color, texture, and size, but the placebo lozenges did not contain active bacteria. Each volunteer on enrolment received a container of lozenges. Neither study subjects nor researchers were aware of the type of lozenges used.

All participants took probiotics/placebos for 4 weeks, 1 lozenge per day ( Table 2 ). The intervention was followed by a two-week washout period, during which the prescribed lozenges were not taken. This period was introduced to assess the stability of the achieved results. Table 2 . Arms' characteristics.

Group 1-probiotic ("Bactoblis")

Streptococcus salivarius K12 (≥1 × 10 9 CFU in 1 tablet), fructose (sweetener), maltodextrin, silicon dioxide, magnesium stearate (vegetable), flavoring (strawberry) Dissolve the lozenges in the mouth once a day for 4 weeks Group 2-placebo Fructose (sweetener), maltodextrin, silicon dioxide, magnesium stearate (vegetable), flavoring (strawberry) CFU-Colony-forming unit.

Primary outcome measures included concentration of secretory immunoglobulin A in saliva and unstimulated salivary flow rate. Secondary outcome measures included Turesky modification of the Quigley-Hein plaque index (TQHPI) and the papillary marginal attached index (PMA). The evaluations were performed at baseline and 4 and 6 weeks by a single operator (DS).

TQHPI, PMA, and DMFT (decayed, missing, and filled teeth index) were accessed as described elsewhere [41] [42] [43] . Salivary concentration of sIgA was determined with the help of ELISA and using the salivary secretory IgA indirect enzyme immunoassay kit (8668 IgA secretory ELISA-BEST kit, VectorBest, Novosibirsk, Russia), in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.

For unstimulated salivary flow measurements, participants refrained from eating, drinking, smoking, or conducting oral hygiene procedures for a minimum of 90 min prior to salivary collection. To avoid diurnal variations in saliva output, all measurements were Nutrients 2022, 14, 1124 5 of 13 taken in the morning. Participants were comfortably seated and, after a few minutes of relaxation, were trained to avoid swallowing saliva and asked to lean forward and spit all the saliva they produced every 2 min through a glass funnel and into a graduated test tube. The volume of the saliva collected over the 10-min period was measured. The flow rate was determined according to the following formula: Salivation rate (ml/min) = saliva volume (mL)/saliva collection time (min).

The sample size for this pilot study was defined based on the sample sizes of similar studies [44] [45] [46] . All analyses were performed using per-protocol population. We analyzed all subjects who did not substantially deviate from the protocol as to be determined on a persubject basis by the study's principal investigator (KB) immediately before database lock.

Data were presented as means and standard deviations with 95% confidence intervals, medians and 25 and 75 percentiles, and percentages depending on the type of variables. The normality and sphericity of distribution of continuous variables were assessed with Shapiro-Wilk and Levene's tests, respectively. If the assumptions of normality and sphericity were met, repeated measures mixed ANOVA was performed followed by the post hoc Tukey's test with adjustment for multiple comparisons. If the aforementioned assumptions were not met, the differences between the groups were assessed using the Mann-Witney U-test and the differences within the groups at different study timepoints were assessed with Friedman test with post hoc comparisons. The same non-parametric tests were used for the analyses of categorical and ordinal variables. Fisher's exact test was used to access the frequencies of categorical variables in the groups.

Data entry was completed in the RedCap database. The data were exported into CSV file format, which was then used for data analysis (only de-identified data) in R version 3.6.0 (26 April 2019), using the following packages: "doBy," "rstatix," "tidyverse," "ggpubr," "stats," "effectsize," "psych," "PMCMRplus," "lawstat," "library," "corrplot," and "Hmisc."

The study sample included 31 volunteers (27 females and 3 males) aged 20-24 years (mean: 21.2 ± 0.8 years). They were divided into the placebo group (14 females and 2 males) and the probiotic group (14 females and 1 male) using a random sequence generator. There were no significant differences between the groups in age, gender distribution, DMFT, and the decay component of DMFT values (Table 3) . Figure 1 shows the patient flow diagram. Of the 31 individuals included in this study, 30 completed the entire study protocol. One participant from the probiotic group was lost Figure 1 shows the patient flow diagram. Of the 31 individuals included in this study, 30 completed the entire study protocol. One participant from the probiotic group was lost to follow-up due to sickness not related to the intervention (COVID- 19) . No adverse effects were registered. The baseline, outcome, and washout values of salivary IgA, unstimulated salivary flow rate, and dental indices are presented in Table 4 . We found no statistically significant differences in the salivary secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) levels and unstimulated salivary flow rates between the individuals who took probiotics and placebos. After a 4-week probiotic intervention and a 2-week washout period, the study participants had significantly lower TQHPI values than the controls. At baseline, seven participants (three in the probiotic group and four in the control group) had PMA index values greater than 0. The PMA values tended to decrease in the probiotic group at the outcome and washout timepoints, although these changes did not reach the level of statistical significance (p = 0.06081). There were no statistically significant differences in the distribution of the study subjects across the levels of salivary sIgA and PMA in the probiotic and placebo groups at all study timepoints (Table 5 ). Table 5 . Distribution of sIgA levels (low, normal, high) a and PMA (zero or greater than zero) in the study groups.

Level of sIgA Baseline, n (%) Figure 2 shows the results of the correlation analysis of oral health indicators. We found a strong negative correlation between salivation rate and sIgA level (r = −0.62), p = 0.000239395). A moderate positive correlation was detected between the number of decayed teeth and TQHPI values (r = 0.57, p = 0.000968335). No significant correlation was observed between the number of the decay component of DMFT and sIgA level (r = 0.17, p = 0.379). 

In the present study, we assessed the effect of oral probiotics containing Streptococcus salivarius K12 on secretory immunoglobulin A salivary levels, salivation rates, and oral 

In the present study, we assessed the effect of oral probiotics containing Streptococcus salivarius K12 on secretory immunoglobulin A salivary levels, salivation rates, and oral biofilm in healthy adults. We found no increase in salivary secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) levels and salivary flow rates in the probiotic group compared with the placebo group. However, we observed a significant decrease in plaque accumulation in the probiotic group after 2 and 4 weeks of probiotic intake. A decrease in the PMA index was observed in the probiotic group, although the differences did not reach the level of statistical significance. This was possibly due to a small number of patients with gingivitis.

Salivary IgA is an important protein that participates in the prevention of oral diseases. sIgA level determination is widely used in dental science, as it can be collected noninvasively and is considered an indicator of health and disease [47] . Probiotics demonstrated beneficial effect on host immune response [48] , although studies of the effect of probiotics on sIgA levels have shown conflicting results. Some studies found increased levels of salivary sIgA in adults [44, 47, [49] [50] [51] , elderly patients [52] , and children [47, 48] after probiotic intake, while others were unable to confirm such findings [23, [53] [54] [55] [56] . One study even demonstrated a decrease in salivary sIgA after Bifidobacterium-containing probiotic intake [57] . A meta-analysis by Ebrahimpour et al. demonstrated no significant effect of probiotic intake on salivary sIgA levels compared to placebo [58] , which is in line with our results. In the present study, the analysis of variance showed that neither the time factor (baseline/outcome/washout) nor the group factor (probiotic/placebo) affected the salivary sIgA levels.

Salivary flow rate is another crucial parameter for the maintenance of oral and systemic health [59] . There is some evidence that probiotics may affect salivary flow rate [59, 60] . However, other studies did not confirm this effect of probiotics [61] [62] [63] [64] . Our results are in agreement with the latter studies: we found no increase in unstimulated salivary flow rate after the intake of probiotics compared with placebo.

Differences in the effects of probiotics on various health indicators may be explained by the age of participants. In the studies involving elderly people, antibody responses might be different from healthy adults [58] . Moreover, intra-and inter-individual variations in saliva volume and its contents are influenced by a variety of factors, such as cigarette smoking [47, 54] , chronic and acute stress [47, 54, 58] , depression [47, 54] , and circadian variation [47, 65] .

Immune-modulatory effects of probiotics in general and for particular species may be strain-specific [54] . To the best of our knowledge, there were no published reports directly comparable to ours. The only report partially comparable to ours was that of Ferrer et al., who assessed the effect of topical application of Streptococcus-containing probiotics on plaque accumulation, saliva quality, and salivary flow [22] . They found a significant increase in salivary flow rate at day 15 in the probiotic group compared with the placebo group. Furthermore, in the probiotic group, there was a decrease in the amount of dental plaque and gingival inflammation, but no differences were observed in the placebo group [22] . A similar effect on plaque formation was reported by Burton at al., who demonstrated that the probiotic strain S. salivarius M18 administered twice daily caused a significant reduction in plaque formation in children [66] . In the present study, we observed a significant decrease in TQHPI in the probiotic group after 2 and 4 weeks of probiotic intake.

However, the plaque-reducing effect of probiotics may also be strain-specific and product-specific. According to a meta-analysis by Nadelman et al., dairy probiotics increased plaque accumulation, possibly due to an increase in the amount of carbohydrates [67] .

It could be expected that a decrease in plaque index would result in a decrease in gingivitis (PMA score). A number of studies have demonstrated that probiotics significantly improved various gingival health indicators, i.e., decreased gingival indices and bleeding on probing [22, 42, 68, 69] . In our study, a decrease in the PMA index was observed in the probiotic group, although the differences did not reach the level of statistical significance. This was possibly due to a small number of patients with gingivitis due to good or moderate levels of oral hygiene in the majority of patients in both groups. Similarly, Montero et al. reported insignificant changes in the mean gingival index in general, although it significantly reduced at the sites of severe inflammation [70] .

Although plaque accumulation rate is a rapidly changing variable and caries development is a relatively slow process, we found a moderate positive correlation between TQHPI values and the number of decayed teeth. There was no significant correlation between the value of the decay component of DMFT and sIgA level, although some authors hypothesized that the level of salivary sIgA may serve as a predictor of caries resistance in a patient [27, [71] [72] [73] .

According to the literature, protein concentrations in saliva may also be dependent on the changes in salivary flow rates [74, 75] , so they may be sIgA levels [76, 77] . For example, an increase in salivary sIgA in people with xerostomia was reported in pregnant women [78] and students experiencing stress because of exams [74] . We found a strong negative correlation between salivation rates and sIgA levels (p < 0.001). Similarly, an inverse correlation between salivary flow rates and salivary sIgA concentrations has been reported in previous studies [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] .

We readily acknowledge several limitations to our study. This was a pilot study; the relatively small number of participants was defined based on the sample sizes of similar studies [44] [45] [46] . Further research with a larger sample size is planned based on the data generated in the present study. A four-week intake of probiotics and two-week washout period are relatively short periods for the assessment of the effect of probiotics; however, similar timepoints were used in the previous studies [47, 54, 84] . Moreover, although probiotics may affect different salivary components [25, 58, 63, 85] , we assessed the influence of probiotics on a single salivary protein (sIgA), having hypothesized that this parameter would be the most sensitive one to probiotic intake.

Within the limitations of this pilot study, it can be concluded that probiotic intake (Streptococcus salivarius K12) does not affect salivation rates and secretory immunoglobulin A salivary levels in healthy adults. However, a decrease in plaque accumulation was observed. 

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Effects of Altitude on Human Oral Microbes

Oral Biofilms: Pathogens, Matrix, and Polymicrobial Interactions in Microenvironments

Efficacy and Patient's Acceptance of Alternative Methods for Caries Removal-A Systematic Review

A Correlative Study of the Levels of Salivary Streptococcus Mutans, Lactobacilli and Actinomyces with Dental Caries Experience in Subjects with Mixed and Permanent Dentition

Reduction of Streptococcus Mutans by Probiotic Milk: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Probiotics in Food Health and Nutritional Properties and Guidelines for Evaluation

Prebiotics and Postbiotics on Mitigation of Depression Symptoms: Modulation of the Brain-Gut-Microbiome Axis

Effects of Bifidobacterium Longum and Lactobacillus Rhamnosus on Gut Microbiota in Patients with Lactose Intolerance and Persisting Functional Gastrointestinal Symptoms: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Cross-over Study

Probiotics in Late Infancy Reduce the Incidence of Eczema: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Oral Probiotics Influence Oral and Respiratory Tract Infections in Pediatric Population: A Randomized Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study

Alterations of Intestinal Flora and the Effects of Probiotics in Children with Recurrent Respiratory Tract Infection

Effect of Microbial Interactions on in Vitro Plaque Formation by Streptococcus Mutans

Effects of the Consumption of Probiotic Yogurt Containing Bifidobacterium Lactis Bb12 on the Levels of Streptococcus Mutans and Lactobacilli in Saliva of Students with Initial Stages of Dental Caries: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Effectiveness of Probiotic Milk and Fluoride Mouthrinse on Salivary Streptococcus Mutans Counts and Plaque Scores in Children-An in Vivo Experimental Study

Effect of Probiotic Bacteria on Oral Candida in Head-and Neck-Radiotherapy Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Cheese Supplemented with Probiotics Reduced the Candida Levels in Denture Wearers-RCT

Versatile Bioactive Components in Promoting Human Health

Role of Lactobacillus Reuteri in Human Health and Diseases

Oral Microbiota Shift after 12-Week Supplementation with Lactobacillus Reuteri DSM 17938 and PTA 5289; A Randomized Control Trial

Microbial Etiology and Prevention of Dental Caries: Exploiting Natural Products to Inhibit Cariogenic Biofilms

Topic Application of the Probiotic Streptococcus Dentisani Improves Clinical and Microbiological Parameters Associated With Oral Health. Front

Daily Intake of Fermented Milk Containing Lactobacillus Casei Shirota (Lcs) Modulates Systemic and Upper Airways Immune/Inflammatory Responses in Marathon Runners

Increasing Salivary IgA and Reducing Streptococcus Mutans by Probiotic Lactobacillus Paracasei SD1: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Study

The Effect of Probiotics on the Secretory Immunity of Saliva in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Is the Role of IgA in Local Immunity Completely Known? Food Agric

The Role of Salivary SIgA as Protection for Dental Caries Activity in Indonesian Children

Probiotics as an Adjunct Therapy for the Treatment of Halitosis, Dental Caries and Periodontitis

Complete Genome Sequence of Streptococcus Salivarius HSISS4, a Human Commensal Bacterium Highly Prevalent in the Digestive Tract

Probiotic Streptococcus Strains in Caries Prevention: A Systematic Review

Inhibition of Ecological Emergence of Mutans Streptococci Naturally Transmitted between Rats and Consequent Caries Inhibition by Streptococcus Salivarius TOVE-R Infection

Complete Genome Sequence of Megaplasmid-Bearing Streptococcus Salivarius Strain LAB813, Isolated from the Dental Plaque of a Caries-Free Child

Investigation of Streptococcus Salivarius-Mediated Inhibition of Pneumococcal Adherence to Pharyngeal Epithelial Cells

Inhibitory Effect of Streptococcus Salivarius K12 and M18 on Halitosis In Vitro

Streptococcus Salivarius K12 Inhibits Candida Albicans Aggregation, Biofilm Formation and Dimorphism

The Potential of Streptococcus Salivarius Oral Films in the Management of Dental Caries: An Inkjet Printing Approach

Cariogram Outcome after 90 Days of Oral Treatment with Streptococcus Salivarius M18 in Children at High Risk for Dental Caries: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Study

Influence of Oral Probiotic Streptococcus Salivarius K12 on Ear and Oral Cavity Health in Humans: Systematic Review

Reduced Plaque Formation by the Chloromethyl Analogue of Victamine C

Effect of Bovine Milk Fermented with Lactobacillus Rhamnosus L8020 on Periodontal Disease in Individuals with Intellectual Disability: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Oral Health Surveys Basic Methods, 5th ed.; World Health Organization

Salivary IgA Response to Probiotic Bacteria and Mutans Streptococci after the Use of Chewing Gum Containing Lactobacillus Reuteri

Oral Administration of the Probiotic Lactobacillus Fermentum VRI-003 and Mucosal Immunity in Endurance Athletes

Bifidobacterium Animalis Subsp Lactis HN019 Presents Antimicrobial Potential against Periodontopathogens and Modulates the Immunological Response of Oral Mucosa in Periodontitis Patients

Presence of Lactobacillus Reuteri in Saliva Coincide with Higher Salivary IgA in Young Adults after Intake of Probiotic Lozenges

Novel Probiotic Enterococcus Faecium IS-27526 Supplementation Increased Total Salivary SIgA Level and Bodyweight of Pre-School Children: A Pilot Study

Oral Intake of Lactobacillus Pentosus Strain B240 Accelerates Salivary Immunoglobulin A Secretion in the Elderly: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trial

Viable and Heat-Killed Probiotic Strains Improve Oral Immunity by Elevating the IgA Concentration in the Oral Mucosa

Immune Response of Healthy Adults to the Ingested Probiotic Lactobacillus Casei Shirota

Probiotic Strain Bacillus Subtilis CU1 Stimulates Immune System of Elderly during Common Infectious Disease Period: A Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study

Effects of Seven Potential Probiotic Strains on Specific Immune Responses in Healthy Adults: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Lactobacillus Reuteri Supplements Do Not Affect Salivary IgA or Cytokine Levels in Healthy Subjects: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-over Trial

Immune Status, Well-Being and Gut Microbiota in Military Supplemented with Synbiotic Ice Cream and Submitted to Field Training: A Randomised Clinical Trial

High-Dose Probiotic Supplementation Containing Lactobacillus Casei for 7 Days Does Not Enhance Salivary Antimicrobial Protein Responses to Exertional Heat Stress Compared With Placebo

Xylo-Oligosaccharides Alone or in Synbiotic Combination with Bifidobacterium Animalis Subsp. Lactis Induce Bifidogenesis and Modulate Markers of Immune Function in Healthy Adults: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomised, Factorial Cross-over Study

Effects of Probiotics on Salivary Cytokines and Immunoglobulines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on

Effect of Ingesting Yogurt Fermented with Lactobacillus Delbrueckii Ssp. Bulgaricus OLL1073R-1 on Influenza Virus-Bound Salivary IgA in Elderly Residents of Nursing Homes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of Probiotics on the Amount and PH of Saliva in Edentulous Patients: A Prospective Study

Effects of Probiotics Supplementation and Circuit Training on Immune Responses among Sedentary Young Males

Effects of Probiotics on Salivary Streptecoccus Mutans and Lactobacillus Levels in Orthodontic Patients

Probiotic Intervention Influences the Salivary Levels of Matrix Metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 and Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinases (TIMP)-1 in Healthy Adults

Effects of Lactobacillus Salivarius-Containing Tablets on Caries Risk Factors: A Randomized Open-Label Clinical Trial

Comparison of Salivary IgA Secretion Rate Collected by the Aspiration Method and Swab Method. Biosci. Microbiota Food Health

Influence of the Probiotic Streptococcus Salivarius Strain M18 on Indices of Dental Health in Children: A Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Are Dairy Products Containing Probiotics Beneficial for Oral Health? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Oral Probiotics in the Management of Gingivitis in Diabetic Patients: A Double Blinded Randomized Controlled Study

Probiotics for Managing Caries and Periodontitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Clinical and Microbiological Effects of the Adjunctive Use of Probiotics in the Treatment of Gingivitis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Evaluation of the Relationship between Caries Indices and Salivary Secretory IgA, Salivary PH, Buffering Capacity and Flow Rate in Children with Down's Syndrome

Association between Salivary S-IgA Concentration and Dental Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Evaluation of Total Salivary Secretory Immunoglobulin A and Mi/Fans-Specific SIgA among Children Having Dissimilar Caries Status

Psychological Stress and Its Influence on Salivary Flow Rate, Total Protein Concentration and IgA, IgG and IgM Titers

Relationship between Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate and Saliva Composition of Healthy Children in Taiwan

Human Secretory Immunoglobulins. VII. Concentrations of parotid IgA and other secretory proteins in relation to the rate of flow and duration of secretory stimulus

Method for Detecting IgA Antibodies to Streptococcus Mutans Serotypes in Parotid Saliva

Salivary Flow Rate, PH, and Concentrations of Calcium, Phosphate, and SIgA in Brazilian Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women

No Relationship of Salivary Flow Rate or Secretory Immunoglobulin A to Dental Caries in Children

Antimicrobial Systems of Human Whole Saliva in Relation to Dental Caries, Cariogenic Bacteria, and Gingival Inflammation in Young Adults

Secretion of Parotid IgA in Relation to Gingival Inflammation and Dental Caries Experience in Man

Secretion of Salivary Immunoglobulin a in Relation to Age, Saliva Flow, Mood States, Secretion of Albumin, Cortisol, and Catecholamines in Saliva

B2-Microglobulin in Saliva and Its Relation to Flow Rate in Different Glands in Man

Salivary Mutans Streptococci and Lactobacilli Modulations in Young Children on Consumption of Probiotic Ice-Cream Containing Bifidobacterium Lactis Bb12 and Lactobacillus Acidophilus La5

Effect of Probiotic Lozenges Containing Lactobacillus Reuteri on Oral Wound Healing: A Pilot Study