key: cord-0899588-yjqvyq1v
authors: Das, Anthony V; Chaurasia, Sunita; Joseph, Joveeta; Murthy, Somasheila I
title: Year one of COVID-19 pandemic in India: Effect of lockdown and unlock on the presentation of patients with infective keratitis at a tertiary eye center
date: 2021-12-03
journal: Indian J Ophthalmol
DOI: 10.4103/ijo.ijo_2449_21
sha: fde11bbb232a8ffe2d14e298b68fe04a43aa1b8a
doc_id: 899588
cord_uid: yjqvyq1v

nan

Dear Editor, The COVID-19 pandemic brought about a significant number of new challenges in access to healthcare services for patients across the country. [1, 2] The most common cause of patients seeking eye care services despite the lockdown was related to corneal disorders; among them, microbial keratitis was the most common condition. [3] We describe a comparative report of the effect of lockdown and unlock of the COVID-19 pandemic on the presentation of patients with infectious keratitis at a tertiary eye care center in India. This was a cross-sectional observational hospital-based study that included 10,977 patients presenting between March 25, 2017 and March 31, 2021 to a tertiary eye care center in India. The data were analyzed using a browser-based electronic medical records system (eyeSmart EMR). [4] [5] [6] The study duration was divided into three categories: Pre COVID-19: March 25, 2017-March 24, 2020); Lockdown (Phase 1-4): March 25, 2021-May 31, 2021; and Unlock (Phase 1-10): June 1, 2020-March 31, 2021. [7] The patients presenting from the same location of the eye center were classified as "intracity," those from outside the city but from the same state of the eye center were classified as "intrastate," those from outside the state were classified as "interstate," and those from outside India were classified as "international" patients. Fig. 1 .

A proportional reduction of 65.7% was seen in patients requiring interstate travel and an increase was seen of 12.95% in intracity and 55.88% in intrastate patients during the lockdown phase. There was a near-complete recovery in the proportion of outpatients to 97.7% for interstate and an incomplete recovery of 45.97% for international patients during the unlock phases. The detailed comparison of the geographic presentation in all three phases is described in Fig. 2 

averaged-annual frequency of infectious keratitis during the pre-COVID-19 phase was 2,908, which reduced to 2,252 during the COVID-19 phase; the averaged-monthly frequency also reduced from 242 to 188 patients. Table 1 shows the distribution and yearly change in the number of cases with viral and non-viral Keratitis. A detailed comparison of the monthly trends of keratitis in the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 phases is described in Fig. 3 .

Overall, we observed that there was a 22.5% decline in the total numbers seen at our center compared to previous years. The lockdown phase that lasted for nearly 2.25 months posed challenges such as intra-and interstate travel, which somewhat mitigated in the unlock phases when travel restrictions were relaxed and removed in the later months of the year. This trend is clearly seen in Fig. 2 , which shows that although there was a sharp decline in patients visiting from outside the state and a complete decline in international patients during the lockdown, the pie diagram of patients consulting for Infective keratitis following the unlock is almost a superimposition of pre-COVID-19 era.

The presenting visual acuity was worse in patients with infective keratitis in year one of the pandemic when compared to the previous years. The annual decline was maximum for viral keratitis (36.5%), followed by parasitic keratitis (31.9%), undetermined etiology (30.3%), bacterial keratitis (26.1%), fungal keratitis (8.7%) in that order, while there was an 8.6% increase in mixed infection category [ Table 1 ]. The decline in numbers of patients with infective keratitis during the pandemic is most obviously linked first to the lack of transport during the lockdown, followed by restricted travel and patient apprehension. Other reasons would include preference for local care whenever it was accessible to patients, institution of teleconsultation services, and connectivity with the institute's secondary centers for the patients from within the state. It is also likely that less severe cases, especially those with bacterial keratitis, could be favorably managed at local centers and only those with a more severe and nonresponsive course of the disease were referred to the center for further management. [8] The tendency for an increase in overall numbers by January 2021 [Fig. 3 ]; overshooting pre-COVID-19 era by March 2021is likely due to resumption of normal travel services and ease of apprehension for COVID-19 infection that was related to a reduction in the number of case counts, development of more effective therapeutic protocols, and availability of vaccines, leading to widespread access of the facility, rather than a true increase in the incidence of the infection. A higher proportion of patients presenting with greater visual impairment was seen during both the lockdown and unlock phase of the pandemic. The data on the number of therapeutic keratoplasties can serve as a proxy measure apart from the observation that there was an increase in those with worse visual acuity during the pandemic.

Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation, Hyderabad, India.

There are no conflicts of interest.

Favipiravir: A new and emerging antiviral option in COVID-19

Preliminary report of favipiravir observational study in Japan released

An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time

Demographics and clinical presentation of patients with ocular disorders during the COVID-19 lockdown in India: A report

Tele-consultations and electronic medical records driven remote patient care: Responding to the COVID-19 lockdown in India

Integrated model of primary and secondary eye care for underserved rural areas: The L V Prasad Eye Institute experience

Big data and the eyeSmart electronic medical record system -An 8-year experience from a three-tier eye care network in India

Corneal transplantation and eye banking practices during COVID-19-related lockdown period in India from a network of tertiary eye care centers

Year one of COVID-19 pandemic in India: Effect of lockdown and unlock on the presentation of patients with infective keratitis at a tertiary eye center

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. 

Dear Editor, During COVID-19, eye-banks across the world changed their practices to safeguard the health of their personnel and the patients receiving a corneal transplant. [1] India intensified strict and consecutive lockdowns in 2020-21 with stringent healthcare regulations, especially in highly affected states/ union territories (UTs). We correlated severely affected COVID-19 areas to corneal donation/utilization rates. Retrospective data (corneal tissues procured and utilized) were collected between April 2020 and March 2021 and compared with 2016-19. States/UTs affected with COVID-19 are listed