key: cord-0898318-9tiw9k2i authors: Vila, Julien; Capsec, Jean; Bigoteau, Maxime; Pommier, Kevin; Cook, Ann-Rose; Pisella, Pierre-Jean; Khanna, Raoul Kanav title: Impact of the first lockdown related to the COVID-19 pandemic on ophthalmic emergencies in a French University Hospital date: 2022-04-26 journal: J Fr Ophtalmol DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2022.02.006 sha: 24af15651acb8d25dff88324d5448ca6b748bd35 doc_id: 898318 cord_uid: 9tiw9k2i INTRODUCTION: At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the French government implemented its first national lockdown between March and May 2020 in order to limit the dissemination of the virus. This historic measure affected patients’ daily lives and transportation, resulting in changes in the delivery of medical care, particularly emergency care. This study aimed to assess the impact of this restriction policy on the number and severity of ophthalmic emergencies seen in an ophthalmology emergency department. METHODS: This retrospective study conducted at the regional university Hospital of Tours included all patients presenting to the ophthalmology emergency department over four periods: lockdown (03/16/2020 to 05/10/2020), post-lockdown (05/11/2020 to 06/12/2020) and the two corresponding periods in 2019. The following data were recorded: sex, age, time of visit, reason for visit, diagnosis, severity of emergency graded on the BaSe SCOrE, time from first symptoms until visit, existence of a work-related injury, and referral source (ophthalmologist or other). RESULTS: A total of 1186 and 1905 patients were respectively included during the 2020 lockdown period and the corresponding period in 2019. The study populations for the 2019 and 2020 post-lockdown periods consisted of 1242 and 1086 patients respectively. During the lockdown, the number of consultations decreased significantly (-37.7%), affecting mild and severe emergencies similarly. During the post-lockdown period, the number of emergencies gradually increased but did not reach the level of the corresponding period in 2019 (-12.6%). CONCLUSION: The first French lockdown resulted in a significant decrease in ophthalmic emergency visits, similar for all levels of severity. All age groups were impacted similarly, without the expected exaggerated decrease for patients over 50 years of age, who are considered to be at greater risk for developing a severe form of COVID-19. The post-lockdown period showed a gradual increase in ophthalmic emergency visits, although these remained fewer than the previous year. This retrospective study conducted at the regional university Hospital of Tours included all patients presenting to the ophthalmology emergency department over four periods: lockdown (03/16/2020 to 05/10/2020), post-lockdown (05/11/2020 to 06/12/2020) and the two corresponding periods in 2019. The following data were recorded: sex, age, time of visit, reason for visit, diagnosis, severity of emergency graded on the BaSe SCOrE, time from first symptoms until visit, existence of a workrelated injury, and referral source (ophthalmologist or other). A total of 1186 and 1905 patients were respectively included during the 2020 lockdown period and the corresponding period in 2019. The study populations for the 2019 and 2020 post-lockdown periods consisted of 1242 and 1086 patients respectively. During the lockdown, the number of consultations decreased significantly (-37.7%), affecting mild and severe emergencies similarly. During the postlockdown period, the number of emergencies gradually increased but did not reach the level of the corresponding period in 2019 (-12.6%). The first French lockdown resulted in a significant decrease in ophthalmic emergency visits, similar for all levels of severity. All age groups were impacted similarly, without the expected exaggerated decrease for patients over 50 years of age, who are considered to be at greater risk for developing a severe form of COVID-19. The post-lockdown period showed a gradual increase in ophthalmic emergency visits, although these remained fewer than the previous year. This virus was first identified at the end of 2019 in Wuhan [1] , a metropolis of Hubei province in China, before rapidly spreading to the rest of the world. The exact origin of this virus remains debated, although it is assumed that the initial transmission to humans came from an animal host [1] . The clinical manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 are quite heterogeneous and of variable intensity (fever, cough, diarrhoea, headache, loss of taste or smell). Nevertheless, for some people it causes serious acute respiratory distress syndromes that can lead to death. The main modes of transmission of this highly contagious virus are direct contact (surface) and airborne (droplets). Due to the rapidity of this viral dissemination to all continents at the beginning of 2020 as well as the severity of the disease that it caused, the World Health Organization qualified the COVID-19 disease as a pandemic on March 11, 2020 [2] . At that time, there were 4.16 million cases and 285,000 deaths worldwide [3] . The rapid and significant increase in cases and hospitalizations related to COVID-19 in France prompted the government to declare a state of health emergency by imposing a strict national lockdown measure between March 17, 2020 and May 10, 2020 included (7 weeks). In France this historic decision was unprecedented. In the past, no war or epidemic had ever resulted in a full lockdown of the entire population. This measure forced the population to stay at home and restrict their movements. Only certain activities were authorized with a certificate supervision system: first necessity shopping, medical consultations, work (if teleworking from home was impossible), and outings near home (less than 1 km and for less than 1 hour) for individual sport training or to walk the dog. Failure to comply with the rules resulted in a fine. The primary aim of the lockdown was to limit human contact to attenuate the transmission of the virus in order to avoid the saturation of hospitalization services, especially those in intensive care which deal with severe cases. The COVID-19 pandemic has also had consequences on the French healthcare system (e.g. a 30% reduction in myocardial infarctions in cardiovascular emergency centres [4] ). In particular, ophthalmologic emergencies could have been impacted, as highlighted by a Spanish study which found a 65% drop-in activity [5] . The main objective of this study was to assess the evolution of patient flows in the ophthalmology emergency department at the Regional University Hospital (RUH) of Tours during the 2020 lockdown and post-lockdown periods compared to the reference periods in 2019. The secondary objective was to assess the impact of lockdown on the severity of ophthalmologic emergencies. We conducted a retrospective study at the regional university hospital of Tours. All patients presenting to the ophthalmology emergency department over four periods were included: lockdown (from 03/16/2020 to 05/10/2020), post-lockdown (from 05/11/2020 to 06/14/2020) and the two corresponding periods in 2019 that is from 03/18/2019 to 05/12/2019 and from 05/13/2019 to 06/15/2019. Exclusion criteria were as follows: errors in file creation (blank file, duplicate file), patients coming for a follow-up consultation recorded on the emergency list and incomplete files. In accordance with French law on biomedical research, given the retrospective and non-interventional nature of our study conducted on anonymised data, written informed consent was not required. A declaration to the French National Commission for Information Technology and Civil Liberties was registered under the n°2021_032. This study complied with the Jardé law and the ethical principles set out in the Declaration of Helsinki. For each patient, the following data were extracted: gender, age, time of consultation, reason of consultation, diagnosis, severity of the emergency graded with the BaSe SCOrE (Basic Severity Score for Common Ocular Emergencies), time lapse from first symptoms to consultation, notion of a work accident, mode of referral of the patient (by an ophthalmologist or other). Working hours were defined as a consultation between 8am and 6pm on weekdays, excluding public holidays. In contrast, a consultation outside these time slots was categorised as non-working hours. The variables were either binary responses (yes/no) or a list of predefined responses. The lists of reasons of consultation and diagnoses were predefined from similar studies published in the literature [6] [7] [8] . A maximum of 3 reasons and 2 diagnoses were attributable to one patient. In order to assess the degree of emergency, the BaSe SCOrE tool was used. The BaSe SCOrE originates from a consensus of experts who assessed the severity of 86 of the most common ophthalmological conditions found in the emergency setting [6] . This score has been shown to be of use [9] . A severity score ranging from 0 (not severe at all) to 6 (maximum severity, untreatable) was assigned to each of these conditions. When more than one diagnosis was selected, only the one with the most severe score was used to establish the BaSe SCOrE. The diagnosis of chalazion was considered of grade 1 severity, even though it is not listed in the BaSe SCOrE. Descriptive statistics were used. Categorical variables were described by their number and percentage, while quantitative variables were described by their median or mean. The flow chart and patient characteristics are shown in Figure 1 and Table 1 respectively. Reasons for consultation and diagnoses are described in Tables 2 and 3 . There was a decrease in activity of 62.8% during the first week of lockdown and 58% over the first 15 days of lockdown compared to the same periods in 2019 (Figure 2) . The decrease in activity over the entire lockdown period was 37.7% compared to the same period in 2019. During the post-lockdown month, there was a 12.6% decrease in activity compared to the same period in 2019. Most of the activity was concentrated during working hours (≈70% of consultations) with no significant difference between the 4 periods (Supplemental material 1). It can be seen that the reduction in activity equally impacted all severity levels during lockdown and in the post-lockdown month compared to the control periods (Figure 3 ). The vast majority of patients were self-referred. Over the first 15 days of the lockdown in 2020 (corresponding to the closure of private ophthalmology practices) 1.3% of patients were referred by an ophthalmologist, compared to 3.6% in 2019 (Supplemental material 2) . This is the first French study to evaluate the impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown on ophthalmological emergencies. The decrease in activity during lockdown was 37.7% compared to the same period in 2019, equally impacting all stages of severity. The decrease in activity in our centre represented 62.8% during the first 15 days of lockdown. These is not very developed in ophthalmology. The decrease in work accidents (-61.3% during lockdown in our study compared to the control period) also contributed to the decrease in trauma cases. Our study found an equivalent decrease in all diagnoses regardless of their level of severity. As a reminder, the BaSe SCOrE (a score ranging from 1-less severe diagnosis to 5-severe diagnosis) was used in this study to classify diagnoses according to their severity. reports a decrease in mild diagnoses and an increase in severe diagnoses [12] . The study by Franzolin et al. found an increase in the proportion of consultations of intermediate and high severity and a decrease in consultations of low and medium severity [10] . However, it is worth noting that they used a BaSe SCOrE that differs from ours ranging from 0 to 5 (0-slightly severe diagnoses, 1,2-moderately severe diagnoses, 3-intermediate diagnoses, 4,5-severe diagnoses) making the comparison with our study difficult. The median age of patients was similar in all groups of our study (50 years of age in the lockdown period The introduction of teleworking and partial unemployment did not change the proportion of patients consulting during working hours. The proportion of patients consulting during these hours (i.e. 8am-6pm) is around 70% for all periods. The study by Franzolin et al. (in Italy) found similar results (78% of patients consulting on weekdays during the lockdown and during the control period [10] ). There was no increase in time lapse before consulting in our study despite the health situation, although one in two patients consulted after 48 hours, regardless of the period studied. This result is particularly interesting since the visual and vital prognosis of certain pathologies is correlated to the precocity of the management, in particular neuro-ophthalmological and vitreo-retinal emergencies. A fortiori, the postlockdown period was not marked by a recrudescence of severe diagnoses linked to patients who had not consulted during lockdown. However, these results differ from the study by Franzolin et al. which found an increase in the delay of consultation during lockdown, with 55.6% of patients consulting within 48 hours during lockdown compared to 66.2% during the control period [10] . While looking in more detail at the diagnoses, the example of retinal detachment is relevant since it is a vitreoretinal emergency for which visual recovery is correlated with the precocity of surgical management. In our study, there was a 55.3% reduction in retinal detachments during lockdown, [16] . The unexpected decrease in the incidence of retinal detachment could be explained by several factors: a decrease in the number of Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy, fewer flights and travels at high altitude, modifications in daily life and physical activities. The decrease in the number of cataract surgeries could have been an influencing factor although the delay between cancellations of planned surgeries and our study period was short. It has been reported that the peak incidence of retinal detachment following cataract surgery varies between 6 and 24 postoperative months [17] . [19] . The same study also reported an overall decrease of 41.6% during the 8 weeks of lockdown in 2020. Interestingly, no increase in the surgical activity for retinal detachments was reported upon the 2 months following lockdown, which is consistent with our current findings. If we refer to other diagnoses, we could presume that the barrier measures may have had an impact by reducing certain diagnoses such as conjunctivitis (-56.9% during lockdown compared to the same period in 2019 and -29.7% post lockdown compared to the same period in 2019). Our study reports a 41% decrease in post-operative complications during lockdown compared to the same period in 2019. This result is explained by the decrease in the so-called "scheduled" surgical activity (e.g. cataract), which was reduced to only urgent surgeries in order to transfer staff and equipment to intensive care units. The main limitation of this study is that it is a single-centre study and cannot be generalised to the whole country. However, this limitation can be counterbalanced by the fact that health measures were identical across the country. It would be interesting to compare these results with those of other university centres. In addition, it might have been relevant to study the pre-lockdown period and to extend the periods of comparison to additional previous years, although it is well known that there is an annual increase in the number of ophthalmological emergencies (2015: 10,836, 2016: 11,937, 2017: 12,338, 2018: 12,225, 2019: 12,293) . The 2020 lockdown led to a significant decrease in the number of ophthalmological emergencies, equally impacting all levels of severity. All age groups were concerned with no greater reduction in Table 1 Population characteristics (IQ1 and IQ3: Interquartile range 1 and 3) Missing data (%) 0 (<1) 2 (<1) 0 (<1) 1 (<1) The origin, transmission and clinical therapies on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak -an update on the status Allocution liminaire du Directeur général de l'OMS lors du point presse sur la COVID-19 -11 mars An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time Hospital admissions for acute myocardial infarction before and after lockdown according to regional prevalence of COVID-19 and patient profile in France: a registry study Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ophthalmic emergency services in a tertiary hospital in Spain Consensus on Severity for Ocular Emergency: The BAsic SEverity Score for Common OculaR Emergencies Caractéristiques des patients examinés en urgence par un ophtalmologiste dans un CHU : résultats d'une étude transversale analytique identifiant des facteurs associés au caractère de véritable urgence Epidemiology of ocular emergencies in a non-university hospital: Clinical characteristics and severity grading according to the Epidemiology of ocular emergencies in a non-university hospital: Clinical characteristics and severity grading according to the pandemic on Ophthalmic Emergency Department in an Italian tertiary eye centre The impact of COVID-19 related national lockdown on ophthalmic emergency in Italy: A multicenter study The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on ophthalmological emergency department visits Ophthalmic emergencyroom visits during the Covid-19 pandemic -a comparative study Effects of the first month of lockdown for COVID-19 in Italy: A preliminary analysis on the eyecare system from six centers Impact of COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown on retinal detachments Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Historical Cohort Study Retinal detachment following cataract phacoemulsification-a review of the literature Traumatic retinal detachment--the difficulty and importance of correct diagnosis Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on surgical procedures for retinal detachment in France: a national database study The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.