key: cord-0896981-alnei1op authors: Chattopadhyay, Biswadip; Paul, Bobby; Bandyopadhyay, Lina; Bhattacharyya, Madhumita title: Nutritional Status and Intra-household Food Distribution Among Reproductive-Age-Group Women in a Slum Area of Hooghly District, West Bengal: A Mixed-Methods Approach date: 2022-04-17 journal: Cureus DOI: 10.7759/cureus.24225 sha: 4a577bf3ba230c6860f46efd5ae040bda7029636 doc_id: 896981 cord_uid: alnei1op Introduction Malnutrition among women of reproductive age (WRA), especially those living in slum areas, is one of the most concerning nutritional issues because of the extreme nutritional stress they face in the form of inequitable intra-household food distribution (IHFD). This study aimed to assess the nutritional status (NS) and its association with IHFD among reproductive-age-group women along with exploring the perspectives of the stakeholders regarding inequitable food distribution. Materials and methods The quantitative part of the convergent parallel mixed-methods design study was conducted among 150 WRA, selected by cluster random sampling from 15 slum areas of Hooghly District, between December 2020 and May 2021. Data were collected using a predesigned pretested schedule with anthropometric measurements. IHFD was quantified by the relative dietary energy adequacy ratio (RDEAR). Ordinal logistic regression was performed to obtain adjusted-proportional odds ratios (aPOR) for higher categories of NS (underweight: reference category). Stratified subgroup analysis was done to assess the influencers of IHFD. For the qualitative part, in-depth interviews were conducted with eight purposively selected in-laws of study participants, and the data were interpreted by thematic analysis. Results The mean age of the study participants was 28.6±6.3 years. The proportion of malnutrition and inequitable IHFD (RDEAR<1) among them was 50% and 46%, respectively. Higher categories of NS were found to be significantly associated with an increase in RDEAR (aPOR=22.6, 95% CI: 2.75-185.45, p-value=0.004). Among underweight and normal NS women, those who were earning members and directly involved in food preparation/production had a greater allocation of food within their households. Physiological intolerance, incapacity of earning, and traditional customs were the most recurring themes transcribed as the barriers to equitable food distribution. Conclusion A high magnitude of malnutrition and its association with inequitable IHFD among WRA warrant policy-level support to increase women's employment opportunities and address gender-based inequities through comprehensive information education communication (IEC) techniques as well. Malnutrition represents both under-and overnutrition and is a direct cause of varied complex health problems worldwide. Both of these could lead to the development of chronic diseases if not properly addressed [1] . According to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification, underweight and overweight/obese can be defined as a body mass index (BMI) of <18.5 kg/m 2 and ≥25 kg/m 2 , respectively [2] Globally, around half of the adults are either underweight (12%) or overweight/obese (34%) [3] . Among them, due to certain hormonal and behavioral characteristics (like food deprivation in childhood and insufficient physical activities) women are at higher risk of developing malnutrition than men [4] ; around 120 million women in the developing countries are underweight. Women of reproductive age (WRA), aged 15-49 years, are especially vulnerable to malnutrition; the prevalence of underweight and overweight/obese among Indian WRA was 21% and 23%, respectively, in 2016 [5] . This is worrying after accounting for the fact that more than half of the females in India are WRA, which represents around 250 million individuals. The nutritional status (NS) of WRA is indicative of the overall well-being of a population [6] . It has a crucial influence on the health of their own and that of the next generation. Since the last decade, India has been going through a rapid phase of urbanization, and around 34% of urban Indian women live in slums and are at the receiving end of extreme nutritional stress. Demographic health survey-4 in 2016 estimated that 20.6% of the urban poor women were thin/underweight and 21.1% of them were overweight/obese [7] . In this underprivileged section of urban society, a tangible gender-based disparity in nutritional aspects is displayed throughout the country. In India, the prevalence rate of malnutrition among ever-married women stands at 55.3% as against 24.2% among ever-married men [8] . Recent studies observed that the disparity is even more prominent among the tribal and slum population [8] . This huge gender gap points toward the lack of access to food for Indian women, which in turn points to inequitable intra-household food distribution (IHFD). A recent study in Indonesia has found a relationship between IHFD and dual forms of malnutrition (DFM) among adult women within the household [9] . Certain traditions, customs, and beliefs among especially vulnerable and socially marginalized communities, such as migrant and slum populations, magnify the inequity in food allocation within households. Although the WRA generally bear the brunt of this gender-based discrepancy in nutrition, there is a paucity of information pool within existing literature regarding the influence of IHFD on NS among WRA, especially in India. In an attempt to dwell on the above-mentioned concerns, this study aimed to assess the level of NS among WRA in an urban slum area, and also the factors associated with it, with a special emphasis on IHFD. The study also aimed to explore the perspective of direct stakeholders regarding the inequity in household food distribution. This community-based mixed-methods study was conducted from December 2020 to May 2021 in the slum areas under Konnagar Municipality. The study design was convergent parallel (QUAN + qual); the quantitative strand was cross-sectional and the qualitative strand consisted of focus group discussions. A total of 19 slum areas were included in the study. Adult WRA (18-45 years) who were not pregnant or lactating (mothers with children less than one year) at the time of data collection were selected as study participants for the quantitative part. According to the USHA survey, SUDA-2019, the approximate number of WRA in the study area was 9540. No more than one WRA was selected from a single household. Women, in whose households there were no resident adult males eating household food, were excluded from the study. In-laws of the surveyed WRA were selected for in-depth interviews (IDIs), who have resided in the same household as the WRA at least for the past year. Cochran's formula for determining sample size was applied for the quantitative part [10] . Standard normal variate was taken as 1.96 (5% type-I error), estimated proportion of malnutrition in WRA was taken as 0.38 as per National Family Health Survey 5 (NFHS-5) (West Bengal factsheet 2019-2020) on NS among that group [11] , and the relative error in precision was taken as 25% in the study. After multiplying with a design effect of 1.5, the final estimated sample size came to 150. The qualitative study sample size was determined as per the theory of data saturation. Concurrent mixed-methods sampling (probabilistic sampling for quantitative strand and purposive sampling for quantitative strand) was implemented. A two-stage 15-cluster sampling technique was implemented with the help of the probability proportional to the population size (PPS) method. Each of the 19 slum areas was considered a cluster. In the first stage of the sampling, 15 clusters were selected after line-listing the slum areas according to population, with the help of a random start and sampling interval, as can be seen in Figure 1 . In the second stage, 10 households were selected from each of the 15 selected clusters (cluster size=sample size/number of clusters, i.e., 150/15=10) by simple random sampling technique after obtaining the household list from the respective honorary health workers assigned in that area. In case there was no eligible participant in a randomly selected household, the next household was selected. Participants for the qualitative part were selected by a combination of different purposive sampling techniques, such as convenient, theoretical, and maximum variation sampling. Quantitative data collection was done first followed by qualitative one. After building rapport with the study participants, face-to-face interviews were conducted using a pre-tested schedule. Local-language versions of the schedule were face and content validated by public health experts. Dietary assessment was done using the 24-hour recall method for the previous three days. Anthropometric measurement was done to assess NS. A calibrated digital weighing machine was used to measure body weight, while non-stretchable measuring tapes were used to assess height. Bodyweight was measured at three separate observations of 10-minute intervals during data collection and the average value was taken. Anemia status was assessed using a hemoglobin testing kit containing a digital hemoglobin monitor (Mission Hb ACON Biotech Co. Ltd.), test strips, puncturing lancet, micropipette, cotton swab, and spirit. IDI guides were used for conducting IDIs to the in-laws of study participants. They were instructed to come to the nearby subcenter on a predetermined date and time by local health workers. Study participants were initiated about the whole process and purpose of the study and included only after obtaining informed consent. The principles of public health research ethics were upheld during the study [12] . NS among WRA (measured through BMI) was the study's dependent variable, categorized as per the WHO criteria [2] . The primary independent variable was IHFD, measured by the relative dietary energy adequacy ratio (RDEAR) [13] . RDEAR was denoted as the ratio of energy adequacy (average daily calorie intake/average daily calorie requirement) between a WRA and an adult male living and eating in the same household. The measurement of RDEAR included dietary assessment through the 24-hour recall method for three consecutive days and averaging it. The 24-hour recall method dietary assessment was only performed on weekdays (except on any holidays). Calorie requirements were estimated from the RDA report-2020 [14] . Any household with an RDEAR score of less than one was presumed to have inequitable food allocation to WRA. Dietary diversity was assessed by the Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women (MDD-W) Scale [15] . For each food group, food frequency was categorized as most of the days (daily to thrice-weekly), occasionally (twice a week-thrice a month), and rarely (