key: cord-0894242-34nvur1l
authors: Lu, Wen; Kelley, Walter; Fang, Deanna C.; Joshi, Sarita; Kim, Young; Paroder, Monika; Tanhehco, Yvette; Tran, Minh‐Ha; Pham, Huy P.
title: The use of therapeutic plasma exchange as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019: A critical appraisal of the current evidence
date: 2021-02-12
journal: J Clin Apher
DOI: 10.1002/jca.21883
sha: 7970f99dff22d488751015c80cef1b835c06a0a4
doc_id: 894242
cord_uid: 34nvur1l

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) has led to a major pandemic. While vaccine development moves forward, optimal treatment continues to be explored. Efforts include an ever‐expanding number of clinical trials along with newly proposed experimental and off‐label investigational therapies; one of which is therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). There have been a number of publications on TPE use as adjunctive therapy for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), but no prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been completed. This article critically appraises the current available evidence on TPE as a treatment modality for SARS‐CoV‐2 infection.

In December 2019, a novel coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was reported in Wuhan, China. SARS-CoV-2 is a RNA virus that belongs to the beta coronavirus genus. 1 In humans, the entry receptor is angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). 1,2 ACE2 is expressed on epithelial and endothelial cells throughout the body (eg, lung, kidney, and gastrointestinal tract), which may in part explain the ability of SARS-CoV-2 to cause systemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID- 19) . As of 27 September 2020, 32.7 million infections and over 991 000 deaths have been reported to the World Health Organization. 3 In adults, SARS-CoV-2 primarily causes respiratory illness, but can lead to cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, hematologic, neurologic, and other manifestations. Approximately 5% of patients develop severe COVID-19, which is characterized by acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multi-organ failure (MOF), and septic shock that require intensive supportive care and often lead to poor prognosis. 2 Early on, elevations in ferritin, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate dehydrogenase (LD), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-6, and other cytokines were reported in critically ill COVID-19 patients. 2, 4, 5 Those with severe disease also had elevated D-dimer and thrombocytopenia. 6 Autopsy findings of patients who did not survive SARS-CoV-2 infection demonstrated microthrombosis and fibrin clots throughout the lung. 7 These findings led to the association of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and hypercoagulability with disease progression and poor prognosis. 4 Hyperviscosity has also been proposed to contribute to COVID-19 coagulopathy and thrombosis. 8, 9 These suggested mechanisms of disease, however, have not been proven. The role of CRS in COVID-19, in particular, has even come into question. 10, 11 It has been noted that while the median value of IL-6 in patients with COVID-19 ARDS is high, non-COVID-19 ARDS patients have IL-6 levels 10to 200-fold higher than COVID-19 ARDS patients. Even more striking, peak IL-6 level in patients who develop CRS after chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells infusion is almost 1000-fold higher than that reported in severe COVID-19. 11 The pathogenic mechanism in severe COVID-19, whether it is due to direct viral damage or cytokine mediated injury and hypoperfusion injury due to microthrombosis, remains unclear at this time.

In pediatric patients, an illness with features akin to Kawasaki shock syndrome (KSS) has been reported in the aftermath of COVID-19; this condition is sometimes known as COVID-19 associated multisystem inflammatory syndrome. 12 These patients present with persistent fever, evidence of inflammation (high ferritin, procalcitonin, CRP, triglycerides, and D-dimer), cardiac involvement, and/or MOF in the absence of other known infections. 12 They test positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies consistent with evidence of humoral immune response, but not all test positive for SARS-CoV-2 by molecular testing. 13 Furthermore, these patients display evidence of elevated markers of inflammation and thus, this hyperinflammatory syndrome is likely due to a postinfectious immune-mediated pathogenesis (and not from a direct viral damage). 13 The mortality in patients with COVID-19 depends on multiple factors, such as age, gender, comorbidities, and even location. Nonetheless, the mortality can be high in a subgroup of patients with severe COVID-19 2 despite intense supportive care. Therefore, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been proposed and tried as adjunctive therapy. The theoretical rationale of this strategy will be discussed and the experience of using TPE in the treatment of this disease thus far will be appraised. Given the novel nature of SARS-CoV-2, the use of TPE to treat other similar viral infection will also be reviewed. In addition, hemadsorption devices compatible with TPE will be discussed briefly. Finally, additional considerations regarding the provision of TPE during the COVID-19 pandemic will be highlighted.

2 | COVID-19 AND THERAPEUTIC PLASMA EXCHANGE 2.1 | Rationale for therapeutic plasma exchange Therapeutic plasma exchange involves the removal of whole blood from the patient, its separation into components, followed by the removal of the patient's plasma, and the return of the patient's other blood components along with replacement fluid such as 5% albumin, fresh frozen plasma (FFP). The procedure can reduce plasma components, such as auto and alloantibodies, plasma proteins, and inflammatory mediators and thus, TPE has been proposed as an adjunctive therapy for the treatment of COVID-19. 4, 14, 15 It is theorized that TPE could attenuate CRS, stabilize the endothelial membrane, and adjust aberrations in the coagulation pathway. 4, 14, 15 This is not a new hypothesis; the peak concentration hypothesis proposed that an imbalance between pro-and anti-inflammatory mediators, coupled with endothelial dysfunction and aberrations in the coagulation cascade, is the pathogenic mechanism of acute kidney injury (AKI). 16 This further led to the theory that AKI can be treated with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Since then, these ideas have been expanded to include the use of TPE to treat CRS mediated sepsis and now COVID-19. 17 In addition to removing cytokines, it has been proposed that TPE may reduce viral burden, clear antifibrinolytic mediators and fibrin degradation products, decrease the levels of injurious free radicals and viscous components leading to hyperviscosity. 8, 9, [18] [19] [20] It has been postulated that using plasma rather than albumin as the replacement fluid may replenish consumed protective factors that maintain microcirculatory flow (such as a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13 [ADAMTS-13] and protein C) and prevent vascular leakage (angiopoietin-1). [21] [22] [23] These theoretical benefits of TPE have been challenged for several reasons. First, while hypercytokinemia is present, the actual contribution of CRS to the progression of severe COVID-19 has not been established. Second, the efficacy of TPE to treat CRS has been questioned because of the incredibly short half-life of cytokines (approximately 5 min) and the continued production of cytokines. 24 Third, TPE does not only remove cytokines, but also nonselectively removes other plasma proteins. Pro-inflammatory as well as anti-inflammatory mediators are reduced along with anti-viral immune factors, such as immunoglobulins and complement. These components may clear SARS-CoV-2 and protect against secondary infections. 21, 25 Fourth, as with hypercytokinemia, antifibrinolytic mediators, free radical damage, and hyperviscosity have yet to be established as part of the pathologic process of severe COVID-19. Finally, there is no published data to support the claim that TPE is able to decrease SARS-CoV-2 viral burden.

A number of neurologic conditions have been suspected to be associated or exacerbated with COVID-19, including Guillain Barre syndrome (GBS) 26 and myathenia gravis (MG). [27] [28] [29] According to the most recent 2019 American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Guidelines, GBS and acute exacerbation of MG are category I indications for TPE (ie, apheresis is accepted as a first line therapy, either as a standalone or in conjunction with other modes of modality). 30 The treatment of other neurologic complications of COVID-19 remains unclear. Evidence for whether TPE is beneficial in sepsis and MOF is limited. Specifically, the ASFA Guidelines states that the optimum role of apheresis therapy in the treatment of sepsis and MOF is not established (category III) based on the moderate-quality evidence available (grade 2B). 30 The role of hyperviscosity in severe COVID-19 is also currently speculative. Nonetheless, TPE has been suggested as an intervention to treat COVID-19 hyperviscosity. 8, 9 Of note, TPE is only indicated for the treatment of hyperviscosity in the context of hypergammaglobulinemia according to ASFA Guidelines. 30 Additional ASFA Guidelines for indications such as viremia and ARDS are not available.

There have been case reports, case series, and casecontrolled studies on the use of TPE in patients with COVID-19, which are discussed below and summarized in the Table S1 .

Therapeutic plasma exchange has been used to treat COVID-19 patients who had various degrees of respiratory involvement ranging from nonintubated patients with pneumonia 22 to those with ARDS 15,31-33 required to be in the intensive care unit (ICU). 19 Patients reportedly demonstrated clinical improvement after TPE. 15 19 Therapeutic plasma exchange has not only been provided as therapy for COVID-19 respiratory disease, but other manifestations as well, such as neurological or gastrointestinal complications. In one case, Shi et al 34 reported the use of TPE and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in a COVID-19 patient with respiratory failure, shock, and persistent diarrhea with report of clinical improvement. Ma et al 35 managed a COVID-19 patient with respiratory failure required mechanical ventilation, cerebral infarct, and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) with TPE. The patient was successfully weaned off mechanical ventilation but remained hospitalized. Fernandez et al 36 provided TPE to one COVID-19 patient with pneumonia and APS, who then became stable for discharge. A number of neurologic conditions have been suspected to be associated with COVID-19. The use of TPE, usually in combination with methylprednisolone or IVIG, with clinical improvement has been reported in rare cases of COVID-19 associated meningoencephalitis, acute necrotizing encephalopathy (ANE), acute transverse myelitis, acute necrotizing myelitis (ANM), and acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN). [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] Seven TPEs were performed in a pediatric COVID-19 patient with postviral quadriplegia and transverse myelitis who requiring mechanical ventilation and did not respond to IVIG and methylprednisolone treatment. However, this patient did not have any clinical improvement. 41 More data is needed to assess the utility of TPE for COVID-19-associated neurologic conditions outside of GBS and acute MG.

Therapeutic plasma exchange has additionally been used to treat severe COVID-19 with ARDS accompanied by MOF and/or septic shock. 23 with severe pneumonia or ARDS, MOF, and septic shock treated with TPE with 20 patients who did not receive TPE. Although those who received TPE had a longer ICU length of stay than those who did not (14 vs 6 days; P = .028), the all-cause mortality was not statistically different between these groups (9.1% vs 45%; P = .055). An unpublished retrospective observational study comparing 40 patients with COVID-19 complicated by MOF and septic shock who received adjunct TPE with 40 propensity matched controls who received supportive care without TPE found no difference in PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio between the two groups at 48 h after TPE (P = .84). After subgroup analysis, the 28-day mortality benefit (47.8% vs 81.3%; P = .05) may be present for patients with pneumonia as the primary source of sepsis treated with TPE. 47 Many reports claimed that patient improvement after TPE demonstrated its efficacy as COVID-19 therapy by removing cytokines, without reporting cytokine levels. 43, 45, 47 When laboratory and clinical information were available, data was limited and inconsistent. Ma et al 35 reported decreased CRP and IL-6 after TPE and IVIG in one patient. In a cohort of six patients critically ill with COVID-19 ARDS followed by progression to meningoencephalitis who received TPE, reversal of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings was reported in all patients. However, decreased ferritin was only observed in four of six patients. 37 Morath et al 46 treated five COVID-19 ICU patients with ARDS, MOF, and vasopressor-dependent circulatory shock with TPE. Biomarkers, such as CRP, IL-6, ferritin, and D-dimer, were reported to have decreased after TPE in all patients, but only three of five survived. Khamis et al 23 found reductions in D-dimer, ferritin, CRP, and IL-6 after TPE, but all-cause mortality was not significantly different between TPE treated and non-TPE treated patients. In a subgroup analysis of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and elevated D-dimer, after PSM, Gucyetmez et al 19 reported a statistically significantly lower unspecified mortality in the group treated with TPE compared to the group not treated with TPE, but the reduction in IL-6 was not significantly different (P = .933).

The ability of TPE to provide survival benefit to patients with severe COVID-19 by attenuating cytokine mediated inflammation is not established. An experience with TPE in a critically ill COVID-19 patient reported detection of SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG and IgA antibodies in the waste bag, as well as a one log reduction in the circulating antibodies in the patient. Given the importance of humoral immunity in clearing SARS-CoV-2, these findings provide cause for concern. 21 In the absence of sufficient data and proven efficacy, TPE protocols as part of the treatment regimens in patients with COVID-19 have been quite heterogenous (Table S1 ). In brief, the treatment schedules ranged from one to nine procedures, usually provided daily, but sometimes every other day. Fresh frozen plasma was specified as the replacement fluid for many, but not all studies. The duration of the procedure and plasma volume exchanged were also variable. 49 reported using TPE and methylprednisolone to treat influenzaassociated encephalopathy in three patients. IL-6 decreased after TPE, and the patients recovered without severe sequela. Patel et al 50 utilized TPE in three children with acute lung injury in the setting of H1N1 influenza. The patients reportedly had features of CRS which were attenuated by daily TPEs (for three consecutive days), but cytokine levels were not provided. Other complications such as thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), 51 hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), 52 GBS, 52, 53 and other neurologic conditions 54 presumably triggered by H1N1 were also reported to be treated with TPE.

Therapeutic plasma exchange has also been studied in SFTS virus, a tick-borne illness. It can cause symptoms including fever, thrombocytopenia, leukocytopenia, MOF, coagulopathy, and neurological abnormalities with an approximate mortality rate of 30%. 55 A cytokine-mediated inflammatory response has been reported to play an important role in the pathogenesis of SFTS. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in nine hospitals in Korea with 53 patients, comparing those treated with TPE (n = 24) with those who were not treated with TPE (n = 29). The inpatient mortality rate of the TPE treated group did not differ from that of the non-TPE treated group (29.3% vs 34.5%, P = .68). 55 Therapeutic plasma exchange has also been studied in neurologic complications associated with adenovirus 56 and EBV. 57 There is one case report of using TPE to treat disseminated adenovirus and acute encephalitis in the setting of allogeneic stem cell transplantation. 56 There is also a single report of postinfectious cerebellitis associated with EBV with improved outcomes after TPE. 57 The data on patient outcomes after TPE in other viral infections is sparse and variable. Due to multiple concurrent treatment modalities, reports of favorable outcomes cannot be attributed to TPE alone. Furthermore, the pathogenesis of COVID-19 may or may not be the same as the other viruses discussed above.

While yet to be proven, the primary theoretical rationale for using TPE to treat COVID-19 is to reduce pro-inflammatory cytokines. However, TPE removes plasma proteins nonselectively, raising concern that removal of protective host defense proteins and anti-inflammatory mediators may lead to worse rather than better outcomes. To address this concern, hemadsorption has been proposed. 4 Hemadsorption is performed using adsorption columns made of porous polymer that bind to compounds typically ranging from 5 to 60 kDa, the size of most cytokines. 58, 59 Blood is placed in direct contact with the adsorbent in an extracorporeal circuit. Different circuit options include hemodialysis, CRRT, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and TPE. 59 Only the Depuro D2000 Adsorption Cartridge (D2000) is used in conjunction with TPE, as it operates with the Spectra Optia (Terumo BCT, Lakewood, CO). The separated plasma is filtered through a proprietary adsorption material (consisting of a blend of activated uncoated coconut shell charcoal, the nonionic resins Amberlite XAD-7HP and Amberchrom GC300C) to remove IL-3, IFNgamma, IL-10, IL-1B, IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, and TNF-alpha. 64 The D2000 is Conformitè Europëenne (CE) marked for reduction of inflammatory cytokines. There is one available case report 66 and two trials registered on clinicaltrials. gov aiming to evaluate the D2000 in the treatment of patients with The pilot study of one of these trials reported treatment of 10 ICU patients with lifethreatening COVID-19 ARDS, at least one CRS defining criteria, sepsis/septic shock, and/or MOF. Nine of 10 were extubated successfully and discharged without complications, while one of 10 expired. 68 The oXiris Set is CE marked to help remove excessive levels of cytokines, endotoxin, and other inflammatory mediators from the patient's blood. 69 CytoSorb is CE marked for the removal of cytokines from circulation, as well as the removal of ticagrelor. 62 The Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter is neither CE marked nor FDA approved. These three hemadsorption devices allowed under EUA are used with hemodialysis, CRRT, or ECMO circuits. Thus, further discussion is beyond the scope of this article. Apart from the EUA, the FDA approved an Investigational Device Exemption for Toraymyxin B PMX adsorber (Spectral Medical Inc., Toronto, Canada), a device developed to adsorb circulating endotoxins. 70 In addition, adsorptive granulocyte and monocyte apheresis (using Adacolumn, which is an adsorptive type leukocytapheresis column containing cellulose acetate beads bathed in saline to selectively remove granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages) was used to treat COVID-19 in a patient with a history of ulcerative colitis. 71 A single COVID-19 patient experience using C-reactive protein apheresis (PentraSorb, Pentracor GmbH, Germany), which selectively removes plasma CRP, has also been published. 72 At present, hemadsorption is not a standardized strategy and there are no randomized controlled trials proving its efficacy in achieving improved clinical outcomes or survival benefits in patients with COVID-19. Additional studies, some of which are currently in progress, are required to determine if hemadsorption is therapeutically effective. 73

Medical management of COVID-19 is not the only challenge posed to healthcare workers and the healthcare system by this pandemic. SARS-CoV-2 infections can be completely asymptomatic and respiratory droplets may travel up to six feet causing person-to-person transmission. The virus may also persist on surfaces for several days. 74 Therefore, equipment management as well as protection of other patients and medical personnel are essential. Personal protective equipment guidelines for COVID-19 must be followed. Apheresis staff should don N95 masks, goggles, gloves, gowns, head, and shoe covers when providing care for patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection. Use of electronic records is ideal. Any paper documents, such as consent forms or apheresis worksheets, should be protected by plastic covers that allow for decontamination. Large private rooms that allow as much distance as possible between COVID-19 patients and healthcare providers is ideal. Instrument setup outside of the patient's room 33 and having unit nurses already caring for the patient perform vascular access 41 have been reported. After the procedure, the apheresis machine should be thoroughly decontaminated. Another precaution may be designating a COVID-19 instrument and quarantining it for 96 h after exposure, 75 if possible and not limited by the availability of apheresis machines.

Routine complications of TPE associated with central line placement, line infection, and hypocalcemia apply for COVID-19 patients. 76 TPE may also be technically challenging to perform in COVID-19 patients who are routinely placed in prone position. 77 An additional consideration is risk of clotting during the procedure which may prematurely interrupt the procedure and lead to acute blood loss in a patient who is already critically ill with hypotension or shock. Given that these patients with COVID-19 are hypercoagulable, adjustments in the anticoagulant must be performed with extreme care to avoid the risk of clotting the circuit while at the same time not placing the patient at increased risk for bleeding. The cost and resources necessary for TPE are not trivial and must be evaluated carefully when the healthcare system is overburdened with pandemic response. Finally, during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, scientific rigor remains indispensable. The release of results in nonpeer reviewed, prepublication status, may confuse the practice of evidence-based medicine.

The potential benefit of TPE as adjunctive therapy for COVID-19 by controlling cytokine-mediated inflammation remains theoretical. The causal relationship between CRS and the development and progression of ARDS, MOF, and septic shock still remains to be proven. TPE not only removes pro-inflammatory cytokines, but also anti-inflammatory mediators and host defense factors. It is unknown whether TPE is capable of curbing CRS while maintaining an adequate anti-viral immune response. There is no published data in support of the claim that TPE can diminish SARS-CoV-2 viral load. Given the novel nature of this virus, clinical studies are limited, but studies evaluating the role of TPE in other viral illnesses are also inconclusive. TPE and adsorption devices compatible with TPE have not been appropriately and adequately studied as adjunctive therapy for COVID-19. The LEOSS (Lean European Open Survey on SARS-CoV-2 Infected Patients) registry is an open, international, anonymous registry covering all aspects of COVID-19 including treatment using TPE. 78 As of August 2020, the trial registry site clinicaltrials.gov listed almost 3000 COVID-19 trials, nearly 10 studying the use of TPE or extracorporeal methods in COVID-19. 73 With these clinical trials underway, new evidence may come to light in the future that will provide stronger recommendations.

COVID-19 pandemic-a focused review for clinicians

Severe COVID-19

COVID-19) Situation Report: 199. World Health Organization

Additive treatment considerations in COVID-19: the clinician's perspective on extracorporeal adjunctive purification techniques

Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China

Therapeutic plasma exchange: a potential management strategy for critically ill COVID-19 patients

Pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2: targeting of endothelial cells renders a complex disease with thrombotic microangiopathy and aberrant immune response. The Mount Sinai COVID-19 autopsy experience

COVID-19-associated hyperviscosity: a link between inflammation and thrombophilia?

Thrombosis in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) through the prism of Virchow's triad

Weathering the cytokine storm in COVID-19: therapeutic implications

Is a "cytokine storm" relevant to COVID-19?

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in U.S. children and adolescents

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) related to COVID-19: a New York City experience

A novel treatment approach to the novel coronavirus: an argument for the use of therapeutic plasma exchange for fulminant COVID-19

Efficacy of therapeutic plasma exchange in severe COVID-19 patients

Potential interventions in sepsis-related acute kidney injury

Coronavirus epidemic and extracorporeal therapies in intensive care: si vis pacem Para bellum

The application of Plasmapheresis for Covid-19 patients

Therapeutic plasma exchange in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in intensive care unit: a retrospective study

Current treatment approaches for COVID-19 and the clinical value of transfusion-related technologies

First do no harm-beware the risk of therapeutic plasma exchange in severe COVID-19. Version 2 Crit Care

Application of plasma exchange in association with higher dose CVVH in cytokine storm complicating COVID-19

Therapeutic plasma exchange in adults with severe COVID-19 infection

Potential limitations of plasmapheresis in treatment of COVID-19 patients: how to overcome them? Ther Apher Dial

Therapeutic plasma exchange as routine therapy in septic shock and as an experimental therapy for COVID-19: we are not sure

Guillain-Barré syndrome in SARS-CoV-2 infection: an instant systematic review of the first six months of pandemic

COVID-19 and generalized myasthenia gravis exacerbation: a case report

Description of 3 patients with myasthenia gravis and COVID-19

COVID-19 in refractory myasthenia gravis: a case report of successful outcome

Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice: evidence-based approach from the writing Committee of the American Society for apheresis-the eighth special issue

Clinical characteristics and reasons for differences in duration from symptom onset to release from quarantine among patients with COVID-19 in Liaocheng

Therapeutic plasma exchange in a critically ill COVID-19 patient

Transfusion service response to the COVID-19 pandemic

Successful treatment with plasma exchange followed by intravenous immunoglobulin in a critically ill patient with COVID-19

Potential effect of blood purification therapy in reducing cytokine storm as a late complication of critically ill COVID-19

Plasma exchange: an effective rescue therapy in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 infection

Plasmapheresis treatment in COVID-19-related autoimmune meningoencephalitis: case series

Acute necrotizing encephalopathy with SARS-CoV-2 RNA confirmed in cerebrospinal fluid

Retracted article: acute necrotizing myelitis and acute motor axonal neuropathy in a COVID-19 patient

COVID-19-associated acute necrotizing myelitis

A strategy to conserve personal protective equipment while performing therapeutic plasma exchange in a patient with COVID-19

A Case report of acute transverse myelitis following novel coronavirus infection

The successful use of therapeutic plasma exchange for severe COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome with multiple organ failure

Treatment of critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 patients with adjunct therapeutic plasma exchange: a single-center retrospective case series

Therapeutic plasma exchange as a rescue therapy in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a case series

Plasma exchange in critically ill COVID-19 patients

The therapeutic efficacy of adjunct therapeutic plasma exchange for septic shock with multiple organ failure: a single center retrospective review

Evaluation of plasma exchange and continuous veno-venous hemofiltration for the treatment of severe avian influenza A (H7N9): a cohort study

Efficacy of plasma exchange and methylprednisolone pulse therapy on influenzaassociated encephalopathy

Use of therapeutic plasma exchange as a rescue therapy in 2009 pH1N1 influenza A: an associated respiratory failure and hemodynamic shock

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura triggered by influenza A virus subtype H1N1 infection

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis induced by severe pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 virus infection: a case report

Guillain-Barré syndrome related to pandemic influenza A (H1N1) infection

H1N1 encephalitis with malignant edema and review of neurologic complications from influenza

Plasma exchange and ribavirin for rapidly progressive severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome

Successful treatment with plasma exchange for disseminated cidofovir-resistant adenovirus disease in a pediatric SCT recipient

Plasmapheresis improves outcome in postinfectious cerebellitis induced by Epstein-Barr virus

The effect of a novel extracorporeal cytokine hemoadsorption device on IL-6 elimination in septic patients: a randomized controlled trial

Why do we need extracorporeal blood purification for sepsis and septic shock? Artif Organs

United States Food and Drug Administration

D2000 Cartridge operation manual for use of D2000 with the Terumo Spectra Optia apheresis system

Code § 360bbb-3: Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies

Reverse takotsubo cardiomyopathy in fulminant COVID-19 associated with cytokine release syndrome and resolution following therapeutic plasma exchange: a case-report

Therapeutic plasma exchange in adult critically ill patients with life-threatening SARS-CoV-2 disease: a pilot study

1-set-use-continuous-renal-replacement-therapyand-sepsis

US-FDA-Approves-an-Investigational-Device-Exemption-for-Spectral-Medical-PMX-to-Treat-COVID-19-Patients-Suffering-from-Septic-Shock.html

The effect of Adacolumn on ulcerative colitis with COVID-19

First-in-man: case report of selective C-reactive protein apheresis in a patient with SARS-CoV-2 infection

Stability and infectivity of coronaviruses in inanimate environments

The ABC's of disaster management: managing apheresis operations during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

Prone position in management of COVID-19 patients: a commentary

SUPPORTING INFORMATION Additional supporting information may be found online in the Supporting Information section at the end of this article. How to cite this article

ACKNOWLEDGMENT AABB Therapeutic Apheresis Subsection, Chisa Yamada.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.ORCID Wen Lu https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2292-3167 Yvette Tanhehco https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7800-3119 Huy P. Pham https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4168-3859