key: cord-0892680-tg15rat5
authors: Ayed, Itimad I A; Khalil, Rehana; Adam, Ishag; Al-Wutayd, Osama
title: Face Mask Practice and Technique During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nonrepresentative Cross-Sectional Study in Sudan
date: 2022-05-03
journal: Patient Prefer Adherence
DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s366099
sha: 1b249670b87065ea2b53901caf53d85e1140a232
doc_id: 892680
cord_uid: tg15rat5

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization issued guidelines for face mask use in community settings during the current COVID-19 pandemic. However, data are limited on public compliance with those guidelines in Sudan. Therefore, this study assessed face mask-wearing practice and technique during the COVID-19 pandemic among residents of Sudan. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted from July to September 2021 among Sudanese aged ≥18 years. A web-based questionnaire was shared through different social media platforms. Personal characteristics, four knowledge-associated items, three attitude-associated items, one item concerning mask-wearing practice, and five items related to mask-wearing technique were determined. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariable analyses were performed using STATA v17. RESULTS: The survey included 1059 participants (48% males, 52% females) from different regions of Sudan. The overall mean ± SD was 3 ± 0.73 for knowledge of COVID-19 transmission; 2.3 ± 0.71 for attitude toward wearing face masks; 0.38 ± 0.49 for the practice of wearing a face mask; and 4.17 ± 0.97 for face mask-wearing technique. Approximately one-third (38%) of participants always wore a face mask during the pandemic, with age, sex, education level, family income, face mask attitude, occupation, and history of COVID-19 infection affecting the practice. All steps of face mask-wearing technique were performed by 46% of participants (59% performed hand hygiene before putting on a mask and 86% after removing it; 98% covered mouth and nose; 90% adjusted masks at the nose bridge, and 84% tied masks securely), and associated with age, occupation, family income, history of COVID-19 infection, and face-mask attitude. CONCLUSION: Although knowledge and attitude were relatively good, the practice of wearing a face mask and using proper techniques among participants were low. To ensure optimal face mask use and proper mask-wearing techniques, educational intervention and establishing governmental regulations are highly recommended.

Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, face masks have been worn for more than one and a half years in public places. 1 Effectiveness of wearing face masks in public settings has been subject to worldwide debate. 2, 3 The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have recommended the use of face masks in the community, but direct evidence from such settings to support face mask use is limited. 4, 5 Multilayer cloth masks block 50% to 70% of small droplets and particles in laboratory experiments; 6,7 the filtering respirator masks N95, N99, and N100 block 95%, 99%, and 99.97%, respectively, of particles with a median diameter of 0.3 μm, according to NIOSH standards; 8 and surgical masks can reduce the outward emission rate of particles by 90% during speaking and coughing. 9 In a systematic review and meta-analysis of six studies with a total of 1233 participants, face mask use was associated with a significant decrease in risk of COVID-19 infection. 10 In another systematic review and meta-analysis that included

An online questionnaire was prepared using Google Forms, and the link was shared through social media platforms, initially to the contacts of one of the authors. Participants were asked to send the survey link to family and friends on their contact lists whom they considered would fulfill the criteria for this study; their friends were also encouraged to send the link to their own contact networks. The questionnaire was based on a literature review of face masks and WHO guidelines. [26] [27] [28] [29] Content and face validity of the questionnaire were ensured by experts. The questionnaire was pilot-tested among a sample of 35 subjects, and the final version was reviewed and approved. The questionnaire comprised five sections: sociodemographic information, knowledge of route of transmission of COVID-19, attitude toward face masks, practice of face mask use during the pandemic, face mask-wearing technique, and barriers to wearing a face mask. Monthly family income was grouped into three categories: ≤US$23 (≤10,000 Sudanese pounds (SDG)) per month (low income), >$23 (>10,000 SDG) to $125 (55,000 SDG) per month (middle income), and >$125 (>55,000 SDG) per month (high income). 30 Knowledge about route of transmission of COVID-19 was assessed by four items (K1-4), which were used to calculate a knowledge score. Three items (A1-3) were used to assess attitudes toward COVID-19 and use of face masks, with each item categorized as either positive or negative. Practice of face mask use was assessed by one item (P1), categorized as always or sometimes/never. Face mask-wearing technique was assessed in five steps (S1-5), and categories were either always performed all steps of face maskwearing technique or sometimes/never. In knowledge, practice, and technique sections, each correct question received one point, with zero given for an incorrect one. In the attitude section, a positive attitude received one point, with zero assigned for a negative attitude ( Table 1) . The objective and inclusion/exclusion criteria of the study were included on the cover page of the survey, and consent to participate was required before beginning the questionnaire.

Sample size was calculated using OpenEpi software. The minimum sample size was 500 participants with 80% statistical power and 5% type I error. The practice of wearing face masks was assumed to be 50% in order to attain the maximum sample size, taking into account 30% expected incomplete and missing responses.

Data were obtained in an Excel sheet after exporting to STATA v17 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Data are presented as mean ± SD for continuous variables and as percentage for categorical variables. Continuous variables were compared using either Student's t-tests or one-way ANOVAs for more than two groups, and chi-squared tests were performed to compare categorical variables. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify determinants of knowledge, attitude, practice, and technique of wearing face masks. Variables at p < 0.25 in the bivariate analysis were included in the multivariable analysis. A multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to determine factors that affected the knowledge score. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors that affected attitudes, practice, and technique of face-mask wearing. Odds ratios (ORs), beta coefficients, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. A p-value ≤0.05 was considered as strong evidence against the null hypothesis.

A total of 1059 participants responded to the survey. Of the participants, 664 (63%) were aged 18 to 30 years, 548 (52%) were females, 527 (50%) had secondary school education or higher, 711 (67%) were single, 507 (48%) were employed, 504 (48%) had family income of 10,000 to 55,000 SDG, 203 (19%) had chronic disease, and 257 (24%) had a history of COVID-19 infection (Table 2 ).

The mean score for knowledge was 3 (SD = 0.73, range 1-4), and the range of correct responses was from 49% to 94%. According to bivariate analysis, respondents with a higher level of education had significantly higher knowledge scores (p = 0.004; Table 2) . Table 3 

The mean attitude score was 2.3 (SD = 0.71, range 0-3), and the positive attitude rate ranged from 48% to 94% (Table 1) . Associations between attitudes and independent variables in bivariate analyses are displayed in Table 4 . The multiple logistic regression showed negative responses to A1 ("Do you think that you are vulnerable to infection?") more often among males (vs females; aOR 1.48, p = 0.005) and those with history of COVID-19 infection (vs no history of COVID-19 infection; aOR 1.99, p < 0.001) and less often among those with postgraduate education (vs secondary school education or below; aOR 0.57, p = 0.026). Negative responses to A3 ("Do you think wearing a mask can reduce the chance of getting COVID-19?") were more common among those with a family income of ≤$23 (vs >$23-125; aOR 2.28, p = 0.015; Table 5 ). 

Of participants, 38% (n = 401) always wore a face mask during the pandemic, 57% (n = 608) used the practice sometimes, and 5% (n = 50) never wore a face mask. Most participants (n = 707, 70%) used medical masks; whereas 30% (n = 302) used cloth masks. Approximately 37% (n = 375) replaced their mask with a new, clean and dry one as soon as it became damp, soiled, or wet, with 29% (n = 293) replacing it at least once daily, 19% (n = 192) replacing it every time they went outside their home, and 15% (n = 149) replacing it with uncertain frequency. According to bivariate analysis, factors significantly associated with never/sometimes wearing face masks were age group of 51-60 years (p < 0.001), males (p < 0.001), educational level of secondary school or below (p < 0.001), single marital status (p = 0.002), students (p = 0.041), family income of >$23-125 (p = 0.029), no history of chronic illnesses (p = 0.001), and attitude score (p < 0.001) ( Table 6) . A multiple logistic regression analysis on factors revealed that only males (aOR 1.65, p = 0.001) were more likely to never/sometimes wear face masks, whereas education level of postgraduate vs secondary school or below (aOR 0.38, p < 0.001), family income of ≤$23 vs >$23-125 (aOR 0.59, p = 0.008), family income of > $125 vs >$23-125 (aOR 0.70, p = 0.019), and attitude score (aOR 0.69, p < 0.001) were less likely to be associated with never/sometimes wearing face masks ( Table 7) .

The mean score for technique was 4.17 (SD = 0.97, range 0-5). Of the participants, 59% always performed hand hygiene before putting on a mask and 86% did so after removing it, 98% covered the mouth and nose, 90% adjusted masks at the bridge of the nose, and 84% securely tied masks (Table 1 ). All steps of face mask-wearing technique were performed by 46% (n = 468) of participants. According to bivariate analysis, factors associated with never/sometimes performing techniques of wearing face masks were age group of 18-30 years (p < 0.001), educational level of secondary school or below (p = 0.004), single marital status (p = 0.002), students (p < 0.001), history of COVID-19 infection (p = 0.009), and attitude score (p < 0.001) ( Table 6 ). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that never/sometimes performing techniques of face-mask wearing was more common among students (vs employed; aOR 1.68, p = 0.032) and those with a history of COVID-19 infection (aOR 1.42, p = 0.027), whereas it was less likely among age group 61+ vs 18-29 (aOR 0.39, p = 0.029), family income ≤$23 vs >$23-125 (aOR 0.65, p = 0.029), and attitude score (aOR 0.69, p < 0.001) ( Table 7) .

Of participants, 19% (n = 193) reported suffocation, 6% (n = 62) reported discomfort due to sweating inside the mask, and 6% (n = 61) held forgetfulness liable for noncompliance with face mask practices. Other reasons were cited by 20% (n = 202) of participants, including cost of face masks, obstructing/hindering verbal communication, conscious awareness of respiration, and difficulty during meals with the need to remove face masks while eating or drinking. However, 47% (n = 491) of participants did not express any concerns with wearing face masks. 

The overall mean knowledge level score was 3 (of 4 total), which indicated that most study participants had good knowledge of the route of COVID-19 transmission. This result is consistent with those of studies conducted in Sudan, Egypt, Nigeria, 

and Ethiopia, in which correct knowledge about route of transmission of COVID-19 was 89%, 95%, 94%, and 95%, respectively. [31] [32] [33] [34] Similarly, in Nepal, knowledge about mode of transmission was overall 95.8%, but in Malaysia, only 43.3% of participants replied correctly when asked whether the virus was airborne, and only 35.7% replied correctly when asked whether touching and eating wild animals could transmit the infection. 27, 35 In this study, there was an association between knowledge scores and educational level, with higher knowledge among participants with higher levels of education. This result is consistent with those of studies conducted in the general populations of Sudan, Egypt, and Nepal. 27, 31, 32 This association most likely occurs because with a higher level of education, a person is more likely to understand print and electronic information regarding new infections such as COVID-19. [36] [37] [38] Gender and age group were also associated with knowledge level, which is consistent with previous studies. 27, 35 Thus, to improve health literacy of both genders, as well as that of aged and illiterate populations in the country, the recommendation is to explore options such as role-play, art, and radio programs. By increasing efforts to inform the public, effects of conflicting information regarding COVID-19 infection, a problem recently termed an "infodemic", can also be reduced. [39] [40] [41] [42] In the present study, attitudes toward COVID-19 infection and use of face masks were positive. Less than half of participants thought they were vulnerable to COVID-19 infection, and one significant predictor of positive attitude identified in the regression model was higher educational level. A relatively high level of education could directly increase awareness and therefore also the sense of being at risk of contracting COVID-19 infection. Furthermore, most participants believed that wearing masks during the current pandemic was necessary and were convinced that wearing a mask could reduce the chance of COVID-19 infection. These findings are consistent with those of studies conducted in China and Saudi Arabia, which also show a high level of positive attitude among participants. 43, 44 The results in this study are also consistent with those of a study conducted in Saudi Arabia in which most participants had a positive attitude toward effective control of the pandemic by compliance with wearing of face masks. 28 High income was also associated with positive attitudes regarding wearing masks to reduce the chance of infection. High income likely increases the chances of having a smart television, smartphone, and advanced Internet connection, and the use of such technology ultimately increases access to health education provided through media sources. In this study, approximately two-thirds of participants preferred to use a medical/surgical mask, whereas others used cloth masks for protection. Medical/surgical masks can reduce the outward emission rate of particles by 90% during speaking and coughing. 9 Although a similar choice of masks was reported by Al Naam et al 28 in Saudi Arabia, it is concerning that the use of any face mask can reduce infection exposure and risk irrespective of its type. 25, 28 However, the key factor that should be considered while selecting a mask is its ability to protect against exposure to droplets. 45 Therefore, on the basis of this property, the N-95-type of face mask is more effective than medical masks. 46 By contrast, cloth masks provide 40% to 97% protection, depending on the type of cloth and number of layers. 47 Despite these differences, the primary reason most people choose medical masks is because they are disposable and widely accessible. 48 The WHO recommends essential mask use for health-care workers, the general population in public places and on transportation, people living in overcrowded places, and vulnerable populations, as well as for anyone showing any symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 infection. 5 In this study, more than one-third of participants always practiced wearing a face mask and more than half sometimes, which were lower rates than those in studies from different regions of Hong Kong, 49 Saudi Arabia, 28 Malaysia, 35 and Iran. 50 However, differences in the type of questions about the practice of face mask use should be considered.

In this study, most participants properly covered the nose and mouth and adjusted masks at the bridge of the nose for better fit, which are important recommendations for effective use of face masks, and also tied masks securely to minimize any gaps between face and mask. The rates in this study are higher than those in a study conducted in Nepal. 27 Particles escape from a mask either by direct penetration through the mask or by leakage from its sides, and both pathways are 

critical factors affecting mask protection efficacy. 7, 8, 27 Medical masks that fit well to the head can significantly improve control of particle escape. 36 Fit can be improved by improved mask design, adjustment at the bridge of the nose, and adhesive tape or fluffed polypropylene fibers. 4, 5, 9 According to the WHO, masks are only effective when coupled with hand hygiene and also with knowledge of proper mask use and disposal. 5 In this study, many participants washed their hands after removing a face mask. This result is similar to that in a previous study on knowledge and practices regarding face mask use among the general population. 27 Multiple regression analysis revealed a significant association between technique of face-mask wearing and employment status and no history of COVID-19 infection. The association with employment was perhaps due to the perceived high risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 of participants within a work environment. 51 In addition, those with a previous COVID-19 infection might have felt they were protected by natural immunity after infection. 52 In this study, there was a positive correlation between practice and attitude scores, which suggested that a positive attitude can lead to better compliance with techniques of wearing a face mask. 28 Some of the challenges associated with consistent use of face masks were also identified in the current study. Suffocation was the major concern of participants, whereas other reasons for not wearing a mask included sweating and forgetfulness. These results are supported by those of a Brazilian study that also identified suffocation as the most cited reason for discomfort caused by face masks. 53 Medical masks easily become damp, and sweating is primarily linked with cloth masks because they retain moisture and are reused. [54] [55] [56] However, discomfort is not the sole determinant of face mask compliance, and social factors are also important. One study found that when more mask-wearing practices are displayed by social groups in a society, the discomfort felt by its residents decreases. 57 Therefore, the solution to compliance lies in social acceptance of mask wearing as a new norm and in promotion of its adherence by health authorities.

There were some limitations in the current study. A web-based survey and nonprobability sampling technique were used, which may not be sufficiently accurate to represent the study population. Thus, the study most likely did not include the illiterate, the elderly, those without smartphones, and those with limited Internet access, which might lead to results that were overestimates because of better awareness and practices among the study participants. Another limitation was that the data were self-reported and therefore could have been affected by social desirability bias. Thus, the possibility that participants responded positively to attitude and practice questions on the basis of perceived expectations could not be excluded.

Although knowledge and attitude were relatively good, practice and technique of wearing face masks among Sudanese participants were low. Therefore, to ensure optimal levels of face mask use and proper techniques of wearing a face mask, increasing public awareness with training is highly recommended.

Ethical approval was received from the Ethics Committee at International University of Africa at Sudan (reference no. FMEC/21/2). All procedures performed in the study were in accordance with the ethical standards of institutional and national research committees and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. Informed consent was obtained from each participant before participating in the study.

Face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis

Rational use of face masks in the COVID-19 pandemic

Evidence supporting transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 while presymptomatic or asymptomatic

Considerations for wearing masks: help slow the spread of COVID-19 2020

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for the public: when and how to use masks 2020

Efficacy of face masks, neck gaiters and face shields for reducing the expulsion of simulated cough-generated aerosols

Effectiveness of face masks in preventing airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2. mSphere

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)

Efficacy of masks and face coverings in controlling outward aerosol particle emission from expiratory activities

Face masks to prevent transmission of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Efficacy of face mask in preventing respiratory virus transmission: a systematic review and meta-analysis

CDC COVID-19 Surge Laboratory Group. SARS-CoV-2 infections and serologic responses from a sample of U.S. Navy service members: USS Theodore Roosevelt

Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

An evidence review of face masks against COVID-19

Inferring the effectiveness of government interventions against COVID-19

Association of country-wide coronavirus mortality with demographics, testing, lockdowns, and public wearing of masks

Reduction of secondary transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in households by face mask use, disinfection and social distancing: a cohort study in Beijing, China

Identifying airborne transmission as the dominant route for the spread of COVID-19

The accelerating COVID-19 epidemic in Sudan

Sudan: WHO coronavirus disease (COVID-19) dashboard

Ministry of Health, South Sudan. Update on COVID-19 response

Uptake and effectiveness of facemask against respiratory infections at mass gatherings: a systematic review

COVID-19 epidemic: disentangling the re-emerging controversy about medical facemasks from an epidemiological perspective

Professional and home-made face masks reduce exposure to respiratory infections among the general population

Advice on the use of masks in the context of COVID-19: interim guidance

General public's knowledge and practices on face mask use during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional exploratory survey from Dharan

Community practice of using face masks for the prevention of COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia

Factors influencing the wearing of facemasks to prevent the severe acute respiratory syndrome among adult Chinese in Hong Kong

Average Salary in Sudan

Knowledge, attitude and practice of the Sudanese people towards COVID-19: an online survey

Knowledge, perceptions, and attitude of Egyptians towards the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19)

A preliminary assessment of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) knowledge and perceptions in Nigeria

Knowledge, perceptions and preventive practices towards COVID-19 early in the outbreak among Jimma University medical center visitors, Southwest Ethiopia

Public knowledge, attitudes and practices towards COVID-19: a cross-sectional study in Malaysia

Mask or no mask for COVID-19: a public health and market study

Digital technology and COVID-19

Social media for rapid knowledge dissemination: early experience from the COVID-19 pandemic

How to fight an infodemic

UN radio spreads covid-19 information to remote areas

Tribal women perform street play on covid-19 to spread awareness among tea garden workers

Somali artists use art to spread COVID-19 awareness. Artists in Horn of Africa country fight misinformation, rumors and stigma surrounding coronavirus pandemic

Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards COVID-19 among Chinese residents during the rapid rise period of the COVID-19 outbreak: a quick online cross-sectional survey

Face masks use and its role in restraining the spread of COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia: knowledge, attitude, and practices based cross-sectional study

Transmission of communicable respiratory infections and facemasks

What type of face mask is appropriate for everyone-mask-wearing policy amidst COVID-19 pandemic?

Effectiveness of surgical and cotton masks in blocking SARS-CoV-2: a controlled comparison in 4 patients

Face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic: a simple protection tool with many meanings. Front Public Health

The role of community-wide wearing of face mask for control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic due to SARS-CoV-2

Mask use among pedestrians during the covid-19 pandemic in Southwest Iran: an observational study on 10,440 people

The perceived risk of being infected at work: an application of the job demandsresources model to workplace safety during the COVID-19 outbreak

COVID-19 and postinfection immunity: limited evidence, many remaining questions

The use of facemasks during the COVID-19 pandemic by the Brazilian population

A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks compared with medical masks in healthcare workers

Effectiveness of masks and respirators against respiratory infections in healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Effectiveness of precautions against droplets and contact in prevention of nosocomial transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)

Use of facemasks during the COVID-19 pandemic

Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focusing on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. This journal has been accepted for indexing on PubMed Central. The manuscript management system is completely online and includes a very quick and fair peer-review system

The researchers would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research, Qassim University, for funding the publication of this project.

OW conceived and designed the survey. IA performed the investigation and revised the paper. OW and RK analyzed the data and wrote the original paper. All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.