key: cord-0876654-27ozvy4h
authors: Papanikolaou, Yanni; Fulgoni, Victor L.
title: Eggs Are Cost-Efficient in Delivering Several Shortfall Nutrients in the American Diet: A Cost-Analysis in Children and Adults
date: 2020-08-11
journal: Nutrients
DOI: 10.3390/nu12082406
sha: 8dc64013fa15ab04dc18f67274752a100d9a8002
doc_id: 876654
cord_uid: 27ozvy4h

The purpose of the current study was to examine the cost of eggs in relation to nutrient delivery in children and adults. The present analysis used dietary intake data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013–2016 (egg consumers: 2–18 years-old, N = 956; 19+ years-old, N = 2424). Inflation adjusted food cost and the cost of nutrients were obtained from the Center for Nutrition Promotion and Policy food cost database. Cost and nutrient profiles for What We Eat in America food categories were compared to whole eggs. Of the 15 main food groups examined, whole eggs ranked third for lowest cost per 100 g (excluding beverages), such that eggs cost 0.35 USD per 100 g, with dairy and grains representing the first and second most cost-efficient foods, at 0.23 USD and 0.27 USD per 100 g, respectively. In children and adults, eggs represented a cost-efficient food for protein delivery, such that eggs provided nearly 2.7% and 3.7% of all protein in the diet, respectively, at a cost of about 0.03 USD per g of protein. Eggs contributed 3.8% and 6.0% of all vitamin A in the diet of children and adults, at a cost of approximately 0.002 USD and 0.003 USD per RAE mcg of vitamin A, respectively. In children 2–18 years-old, nearly 12% of all choline in the diet is delivered from eggs, at a cost of approximately 0.002 USD per mg of choline. Similarly, in adults 19-years-old+, eggs provide nearly 15% of all dietary choline in the diet, at a cost of approximately 0.002 USD per mg of choline. Eggs provide nearly 5% and 9.5% of all vitamin D in the diet of children and adults, at a cost of approximately 0.21 USD and 0.22 USD per mcg of vitamin D, respectively. Overall, eggs ranked as the most cost-efficient food for delivering protein, choline, and vitamin A, second for vitamin E, and third for vitamin D in children. In adults, eggs ranked as the most cost-efficient food for delivering protein and choline, second for vitamin A, and third for vitamin D and vitamin E. In summary, eggs represent an economical food choice for the delivery of protein and several shortfall nutrients (choline, vitamin A, and vitamin D) in the American diet.

The USDA Economic Research Report identifies the majority of US households to be food secure, which is defined as "consistent, dependable access to enough food for active, healthy living", however, a meaningful percentage of households experience food insecurity at various times throughout the year, often being linked with a lack of economic resources [1] . In 2018, the USDA estimated that 1 in 9 Americans were food insecure, which represents over 37 million Americans, including more than 11 million children [1] . Concurrently, an analysis of food costs during the current Covid-19 pandemic shows that food prices are on the rise. Indeed, the consumer price index (CPI) for all food increased 1.5% between March 2020 and April 2020 and was 3.5% higher compared to April 2019. Furthermore, based on the recent month over month elevation in food costs, USDA has revised the annual forecast and predict that food-at-home prices to increase between 2 and 3% in 2020 [2] .

Numerous published studies have demonstrated that food costs can be a predictor of food selection and diet quality, particularly for segments of the population facing economic challenges [3] [4] [5] [6] . In fact, diet costs have been positively linked with scores from the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) [6, 7] -a diet quality assessment tool which provides a measure of adherence to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans [8] . Higher diet costs have been associated with higher HEI scores attributed with greater consumption of fruits and vegetables, and lower intake of solid fat, added sugars and alcohol [6] . In contrast, lower food costs have been associated with lower HEI scores supported by lower consumption of fruits, vegetables, whole grains and seafood and greater consumption of solid fat, added sugars, refined grains, and alcohol [7] . A recent cost of food and nutrients analysis using NHANES 2011-2014 identified protein foods as the second most expensive food category, collectively responsible for about 18% and 23% of the daily food costs in children and adults, respectively; however, protein foods were the least expensive sources for choline delivery. Milk and dairy foods accounted for approximately 6% and 12% of daily food costs in children and adults, and were the least expensive sources of calcium and vitamin D in the US diet [9] . Another food economic analysis using the USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies and the Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion food prices database documented animal-sourced protein, including milk and eggs, as affordable and nutrient-dense food options [4] . Similarly, milk and eggs ranked as the top two economical foods for delivering vitamin D to the American diet [9] .

While several studies have examined the costs of nutrients derived from protein foods in the American diet [4] [5] [6] 9, 10] , there are limited data published on the cost of essential nutrients, including shortfall nutrients, sourced from various protein food sources, with a particular focus on eggs. Eggs have been selected as a focal food in the present research, as the current dietary guidelines have established their nutritional value in several dietary patterns. Therefore, the objectives of the current study were to determine the cost-efficiency of eggs vs. other protein foods in delivering nutrients and energy in the American diet of children and adults.

The analysis used data from NHANES-a cross-sectional, nationally-representative survey directed by the National Center for Health Statistics. NHANES samples free-living, non-institutionalized individuals, and is now a continuous study complied by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), where data is released every two years [11] . Ethical protocols, including informed consent from study participants, have been previously obtained, approved and documented by the CDC ethic boards. Twenty-four hour dietary recall data for children 2-18 years-old and adults ≥19 years-old were combined for the present analyses, from two NHANES datasets (i.e., NHANES 2013-2014 and 2015-2016; total N for children = N = 5669; ≥19 years-old, N = 10,112). Data for the nutrients examined are from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS) database for NHANES [12] .

The FNDDS databases determine food and beverage nutrient values in What We Eat in America (WWEIA) [13, 14] , which is the dietary intake component of NHANES. Twenty-four-hour dietary recalls are collected using the Automated Multiple Pass Method (AMPM) [15] . Although two days of recall are recorded in NHANES, the current analysis focused on 24-h recalls obtained from Day 1, which were collected via an in-person interview. Accuracy, effectiveness, and efficiency of the AMPM method has been extensively reported and previously documented [15] .

Data that were deemed to be reliable and included completed 24-h recalled dietary data were included in the analyses. Egg consumers (N = 956 for children 2-18 years-old; N = 2424 for adults ≥19-years-old) were defined as individuals consuming the following eggs and egg-containing foods:

(a) All eggs (whole, egg yolk and egg white) with no consideration for eggs in egg-containing dishes, and, (b) All eggs (whole, egg yolk and egg white) + eggs from egg-containing dishes (c) All eggs (whole, egg yolk and egg white) + eggs from egg-containing dishes + eggs from baked goods (i.e., cakes, cookies, brownies, etc.)

Egg intake was determined by FNDDS food codes defined in WWEIA egg categories and egg-containing food categories. Since eggs are also incorporated into mixed dishes, the present analysis separated out eggs in mixed dishes using the Food Patterns Equivalents Databases, which provide the number of ounces of eggs per 100 g of food.

Statistical procedures were completed using SAS software (Version 9.4, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and SUDAAN 11.0 (RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, USA). The investigation used survey weights to develop nationally representative estimates and adjustment for the complex sample design of NHANEs. Means (±standard errors) for daily intake of nutrients for the daily total diet and from food groups were determined in children and adults, using day 1 dietary intake data. The population ratio method was used to determine the percentage contribution from protein foods. Mean percentage of total dietary intake of nutrients contributed from protein food groups were considered, in addition to mean total energy and nutrient intakes. [2] . Additionally, the water category was comprised of four categories (7702 'Tap water', 7704 'Bottled water', 7802 'Flavored or carbonated water' and 7804 'Enhanced or fortified water'). Bottled water was assigned a cost of $0.25 per 100 g/L, based on a recent sale price of private label bottled water. Tap water was assigned a cost of 1/300th the cost of bottled water based upon online estimates of the relative costs of tap and bottled water. For flavored, carbonated, enhanced or fortified water, the costs are based on the same methodology used for other foods, using the inflation adjusted cost database. The average costs as $ per 100 g for water within WWEIA food categories used in the analysis were as follows: tap water (0.000083); bottled water (0.025); flavored or carbonated water (0.060); enhanced or fortified water (0.152).

Tables 1 and 2 present the cost of main food groups and protein food subgroups, respectively, per 100 g of food. Of USDA 15 main food groups, whole eggs rank #3 for cost-effectiveness per 100 g (excluding beverages). Tables 3 and 4 present the daily cost of main food groups and protein food subgroups, respectively, in children. Milk and dairy, protein foods and mixed dishes comprise approximately 54% of daily food costs in children, while protein foods (excluding milk and dairy and mixed dishes) alone represent 19% of all food costs in children 2-18-years-old. Similarly, Tables 5 and 6 present the daily cost of main food groups and protein food subgroups, respectively, in adults. Milk and dairy, protein foods and mixed dishes comprise approximately 52% of daily food costs. Protein foods (excluding dairy and mixed dishes) alone represent 24% of all food costs in American adults. Eggs comprise about 1.2% and 1.5% of daily food costs in children and adults respectively (Tables 4 and 6 ). Costs are also provided for all USDA main food groups and protein food subgroups. Table 3 . Estimated percentage of children, age 2-18 years, who consume specified food groups on a given day, and the estimated mean daily cost ($) of each food group expressed in dollars, and as a percentage of the total cost of food. 

Tables 7-14 depict percent daily nutrient contribution from eggs in children and adults. Furthermore, the tables provide cost per unit of nutrient for eggs and other protein-containing food groups (i.e., milk and dairy and protein foods). Eggs provide nearly 2.7% of all protein in the diet of children, at a cost of approximately $0.03 per g of protein (Table 7 ). In adults, eggs contribute nearly 3.7% of all protein in the diet, at a cost of approximately $0.03 per g of protein (Table 8) Data are for adults ≥19 years-old; NHANES 2013-2016, Day 1 data. Cost/Unit = mean cost of one unit of nutrient (i.e., vitamin D) from foods in the category; vitamin D = vitamin D2 + D3; '% Daily' refers to the percent daily contribution of the nutrient from the food group on a given day. Data are for adults ≥19-years-old; NHANES 2013-2016, Day 1 data. Cost/Unit = mean cost of one unit of nutrient (i.e., vitamin A) from foods in the category; RAE = retinol activity equivalents; '% Daily' refers to the percent daily contribution of the nutrient from the food group on a given day.

While the current analysis examined several sources of nutrients and the cost of nutrients, smaller percentages of certain nutrients were provided by eggs. For example, eggs provided nearly 1.1% and 1.5% of all potassium in the diet of children and adults, respectively, at a cost of approximately $0.002 per mg of potassium. Eggs contributed about 1.6% and 2.6% of all dietary iron in the diet of children and adults, respectively, at a cost of approximately $0.26 per mg of iron. Likewise, eggs contributed nearly 1% of all magnesium in the diet of children and adults, at a cost of approximately $0.03 per mg of magnesium.

During challenging economic times, many Americans can benefit from nutrition research that focuses on cost-nutrient analyses to determine cost-effective sources for foods and nutrients. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate the cost-efficiency of eggs in providing nutrients in the American diet. As cost has been identified as a key barrier in preventing many Americans from consuming recommended nutrients from healthy eating patterns [3] [4] [5] [6] , eggs offer a cost-effective food choice in the deliverance of nutrients to the diet of children and adults. The current data show that eggs cost approximately $0.35 per 100 g, and eggs are a cost-effective food for the delivery of dietary protein, choline, vitamin D, vitamin A and vitamin E. In children, eggs ranked as the most cost-effective food for delivering protein, choline, and vitamin A, second for vitamin E, and third for vitamin D. Similarly, in adults, eggs ranked as the most cost-effective food for delivering protein and choline, second for vitamin A, and third for vitamin D and vitamin E.

Current dietary guidelines advocate for a variety of protein foods, of which include eggs, particularly when consumed with limited sodium, solid fat, and added sugar [18] . Previous literature has documented the nutrient-rich aspect of eggs, such that one egg (50 g serving) contributes numerous bioactives and essential nutrients [19, 20] . Further, eggs are an important dietary source of choline, an essential nutrient that is under-consumed by the American population [21] . A 50 g egg contributes 147 mg of dietary choline, and has been documented as a leading food source for choline in the American diet [22] . The metabolic, physiological and structural importance of choline has been well documented by previous reviews and the National Academy of Medicine (previously known as the Institute of Medicine) [21, 23, 24] . With choline involved in neurotransmitter synthesis, lipid transport, metabolic regulation, detoxification, cell signaling, and as an essential building block for cell membranes, NHANES data support the fact that the majority of Americans, including children and adolescents, are not meeting established recommendations for choline intake, thus, creating a potential public health concern regarding choline intake [21] . A recent review highlighted a lack of data availability on usual intake of choline throughout the lifespan, with particular emphasis on children, and the need for future research initiatives to fill such nutrient research gaps [24] . According to the National Institutes of Health, the majority of the US population consume less than the Adequate Intake for choline, while it is estimated that 90-95% of pregnant women have choline intakes below the recommendations [25] . NHANES data has also reported that African American males had lower dietary choline intakes relative to other race/ethnicities, while choline intakes did not differ in female counterparts [26] . Our current data show that eggs contribute nearly 12% and 15% of all dietary choline in the diet of children and adults, respectively. Further, our analysis shows that eggs offer the most cost-effective approach in choline delivery-eggs provide choline at a cost of $0.002 per mg of choline, with the second most cost-effective food being milk at $0.008 per mg of choline.

Eggs are also a dietary source for bioavailable lutein and zeaxanthin, with a 50 g egg contributing approximately 250 µg lutein + zeaxanathin [22] . Lutein and zeaxanthin are carotenoids with accumulating evidence linking to eye health and a reduced risk for vision-related diseases [27] [28] [29] [30] . While the current study did not examine the contribution of lutein + zeaxanthin, our previous research in children and adolescents using NHANES data show that a dietary pattern that includes eggs is associated with significantly greater daily lutein + zeaxanthin intake, in addition to higher intake of protein, polyunsaturated, monounsaturated and total fat, α-linolenic acid, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), choline, vitamin D, potassium, phosphorus, and selenium [20] .

The 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) [18] and the guiding scientific report issued by the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Scientific Advisory Committee (DGAC) [31] have identified several nutrients currently under-consumed in Americans ≥2 years of age, relative to the Estimated Average Requirement or Adequate Intake levels set by the former Institute of Medicine (i.e., National Academy of Medicine)-the shortfall nutrients identified include vitamin A, vitamin D, vitamin E, vitamin C, folate, calcium, magnesium, fiber, potassium in all Americans, and iron for adolescent and premenopausal females. In the current analysis, eggs have been shown to provide meaningful amounts of three DGA/DGAC shortfall nutrients. Additionally, our data show the cost-effectiveness of consuming eggs in delivering vitamin A, D and E, on a per unit nutrient basis.

As has been documented previously in observational studies similar to the present analysis [19, 20] , our study has several limitations and strengths characteristic of epidemiological research. The current dietary pattern was assessed using dietary recall data from NHANES, which contributes a distinctive advantage to researchers, through access to a large cross-sectional database that combines sophisticated, in-person assessments, with validated biochemical, clinical and anthropometric examinations. In addition, a large, nationally representative database to assess the cost of nutrients from foods is a distinctive strength. Limitations of the current analysis include memory recall bias, including the under-or over-reporting of foods and beverages; however, measures have been incorporated to minimize errors in data collection. An additional limitation in the present work may be linked to food prices that do not reflect geographic variations in food price and overall dietary costs. Further strengths and limitations have been previously published and discussed [32] [33] [34] [35] .

The current data show that eggs cost approximately $0.35 per 100 g, representing a cost-efficient food for delivery of dietary protein, choline, vitamin D, vitamin A and vitamin E. In children, eggs ranked as the most cost-efficient food for delivering protein, choline, and vitamin A, second for vitamin E, and third for vitamin D. Similarly, in adults, eggs are ranked as the most economical food for delivering protein and choline, second for vitamin A, and third for vitamin D and vitamin E. In summary, eggs represent a cost-efficient food choice for the delivery of protein and several shortfall nutrients in the American diet of children and adults. 

Household Food Security in the United States

Consumer Price Index

Importance of taste, nutrition, cost and convenience in relation to diet quality: Evidence of nutrition resilience among US adults using National Health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES)

The cost of US foods as related to their nutritive value

An economic gap between the recommended healthy food patterns and existing diets of minority groups in the US National Health and nutrition examination survey 2013-14

The quality and monetary value of diets consumed by adults in the United States

Relation between diet cost and Healthy Eating Index 2010 scores among adults in the United States

Update of the Healthy Eating Index: HEI-2010

Comparing the cost of essential nutrients from different food sources in the American diet using NHANES 2011-2014

Costs of Mediterranean and Western dietary patterns in a Spanish cohort and their relationship with prospective weight change

National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Analytic and Reporting Guidelines

USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies, 5.0-Documentation and User Guide

What We Eat in America, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Overview, 2011-2014: Data Collection

The USDA Automated Multiple-Pass Method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes

Development of the CNPP Prices Database; United States Department of Agriculture

United States Department of Health and Human Services and United States Department of Agriculture. 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans

Egg consumption in infants is associated with longer recumbent length and greater intake of several nutrients essential in growth and development

Egg consumption in U.S. children is associated with greater daily nutrient intakes, including protein, lutein + zeaxanthin, choline, linolenic acid, and docosahexanoic acid

Choline: An essential nutrient for public health

Agricultural Research Service USDA Food Composition Databases, USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference (Release 29

United States Institute of Medicine Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes. Dietary Reference Intakes for Thiamin, Riboflavin, Niacin, Vitamin B6, Folate, Vitamin B12, Pantothenic Acid, Biotin, and Choline

Dietary choline intake: Current state of knowledge across the life cycle

Nutrient Intakes from Food and Beverages: Mean Amounts Consumed per Individual, by Gender and Age, What We Eat in America

Racial/ethnic and sociodemographic factors associated with micronutrient intakes and inadequacies among pregnant women in an urban US population

Role of lutein and zeaxanthin in visual and cognitive function throughout the lifespan

Dietary sources of lutein and zeaxanthin carotenoids and their role in eye health

Lutein and zeaxanthin intake and risk of age-related macular degeneration: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Intakes of lutein, zeaxanthin, and other carotenoids and age-related macular degeneration during 2 decades of prospective follow-up

Report to the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Secretary of Agriculture

Update on NHANES Dietary Data: Focus on Collection, Release, Analytical Considerations, and Uses to Inform Public Policy

The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: Plans and operations

Dietary intake data collection: Challenges and limitations

Evaluation of under-and overreporting of energy intake in the 24-hour diet recalls in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Public Health Nutr

The current analysis was supported by the Egg Nutrition Center (ENC).

ENC had no input into the intellectual conceptualization and design of the present analysis and overall study; in the gathering, analysis, or data interpretation; in drafting any version of the manuscript, and in the final decision to publish the study and data. Y.P., as VP of Nutritional Strategies, collaborates with food, dietary supplements and beverage companies on various food, nutrition and regulatory affairs projects. Y.P. and V.L.F.III regularly collaborate on analyses involving the NHANES database. V.L.F.III, as SVP of Nutrition Impact, collaborates with food, dietary supplement and beverage companies on numerous nutrition research studies, including publishing study findings involving analyses of the NHANES database.