key: cord-0875090-886vfgki authors: Paulo Sunjaya, Anthony title: Implications of respiratory pathogen transmission dynamics on prevention and testing date: 2020-05-07 journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113551 sha: 2fe3addd89ab70af2a626a749f7073a3f7f472ff doc_id: 875090 cord_uid: 886vfgki • Respiratory droplets can travel beyond current physical distancing recommendations. • Limited evidence of air pollution linked to respiratory transmission. • COVID close contact and testing criteria may need to consider these findings. • Universal masking may provide a viable option against these transmission dynamics. The COVID-19 pandemic provides an important reminder on the importance of understanding respiratory pathogen transmission dynamics to support evidence-based practices and recommendations for prevention. The study of respiratory pathogen transmission dynamics is nothing new, previous studies have clearly shown that large droplets can travel more than 6 m away in a sneeze, 2 m away in a cough and around 1 m during normal breathing (Xie et al., 2007) . However, the results of recent studies, some in coronavirus patients provides an important reminder on the theoretical rationale for the possible limited benefit of some current public health prevention recommendations on physical distancing and masking as explained in this article. Currently, the World Health Organization (2020) and other governmental bodies such as the US Center for Disease Control (2020) recommend around 1 to 2 meters for physical distancing. However, as a recent laboratory experiment has showed that COVID-19 droplets can travel up to 7-8 m and that turbulent gas clouds can extend aerosolized droplet life by up to 1000 times from seconds into minutes (Bourouiba, 2020) . It has been supported by a separate laboratory study which showed that aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 particles remain viable for up to 3 hours (van Doremalen et al., 2020) . It must be noted as later explained, the controlled setting of these laboratory experiments reduces the generalizability of these results in the community. Furthermore, another laboratory experiment by Anfinrud et al. (2020) using laser light scattering to visualize speech-generated oral fluid droplets showed the emission of numerous droplets ranging from 20 to 500 µm. This supports the results of an earlier experiment in Hongkong which showed that in seasonal coronavirus patients, viral RNA can be detected even in exhaled breath and not only when patients cough (Leung et al., 2020) . While these findings raise questions regarding our current understanding of COVID-19 being mainly transmitted through respiratory droplets, the R-0 of around 2.3 does not indicate such a high potential for aerosol transmission as depicted (Zhang et al., 2020) . Furthermore, a recent small study in Singapore showed that despite extensive environment contamination air samples remain negative for SARS-CoV-2 (Ong et al., 2020) . There is certainly a need for more evidence on COVID-19 transmission dynamics especially in the community, in asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic individuals following these findings as they are all done under laboratory conditions where the impacts of heat, humidity and airflow are under control unlike in the population setting. Even so, the implications from these studies goes beyond current physical distancing guidelines. It showed the potential for substantial transmission beyond the current criteria of close contact which within less than 2 meters and for more than 15 minutes in several guidelines such as by the US CDC (2020) and European CDC (2020). Hence, broader testing beyond this criterion would be required to detect asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic cases which potentially has similar transmissibility to those symptomatic. This study further supports the value of lockdowns to limit transmission. However, lockdowns are not possible everywhere especially in low middle-income countries where it may lead to chaos as shown in India (Pandey, 2020) . Furthermore, countries that have been able to contain its spread with lockdowns like Germany and China cannot sustain them for too long. Universal masking in public maybe an alternative in such situations and areas of high local transmission such as New York. While there is modest evidence supporting universal masking in public, this is not evidence of ineffectiveness (Greenhalgh et al., 2020) . Universal masking using medical masks that has been shown to be effective in reducing respiratory droplet transmission is certainly ideal. (Leung et al., 2020) . Even so, any masks even homemade masks when utilized properly can help reduce transmission compared to no mask at all as reported in several studies (Ma et al., 2020; Van Der Sande et al., 2008) . A qualitative small laboratory study has even showed that using a cloth to cover one's mouth during speaking reduces emission of droplets (Anfinrud et al., 2020) . It is important to note that for an effective implement the public needs to be educated on its proper use and that it is not a replacement, but must be done in synergy with intensifying other prevention practices such as frequent handwashing and more extensive physical distancing measures. Masking may also confer benefits outside of droplet protection. A recent ecological study by Martelletti et al. (2020) in Italy has shown potential links between higher levels of air pollution and COVID-19 prevalence which was similar to the result of ecologic studies in China during the SARS-CoV-1 outbreak (Cui et al., 2003) . It was hypothesized in these studies that high level of air particulates reduces host immunity and more importantly may become carriers of viral particles helping in its transmission. If this is confirmed, despite limited evidence of the effectiveness of masking against pollution with studies reporting an effectiveness of between 32% to 97%, it may result in an additional layer of benefit outside droplet reduction (Cherrie et al., 2018) . Like using parachutes when jumping out of airplanes, in these times of pandemic recommending universal masking in public with proper education is unlikely to cause harm and has potential to substantially mitigate the COVID-19 respiratory transmission dynamics as discussed above which goes far beyond current recommendations. The author declares no conflict of interest with regards to this publication. Visualizing Speech-Generated Oral Fluid Droplets with Laser Light Scattering Turbulent Gas Clouds and Respiratory Pathogen Emissions: Potential Implications for Reducing Transmission of COVID-19 Effectiveness of face masks used to protect Beijing residents against particulate air pollution Air pollution and case fatality of SARS in the People's Republic of China: an ecologic study Case definition and European surveillance for COVID-19 Face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks Potential utilities of mask-wearing and instant hand hygiene for fighting SARS-CoV-2 Air Pollution and the Novel Covid-19 Disease: a Putative Disease Risk Factor Air, Surface Environmental, and Personal Protective Equipment Contamination by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Coronavirus: The children struggling to survive India's lockdown Professional and home-made face masks reduce exposure to respiratory infections among the general population World Health Organization, 2020. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for the public How far droplets can move in indoor environments--revisiting the Wells evaporation-falling curve Evolving epidemiology and transmission dynamics of coronavirus disease 2019 outside Hubei province, China: a descriptive and modelling study