key: cord-0867250-83tsq2ix authors: Dinić, Milan; Šantrić Milićević, Milena; Mandić‐Rajčević, Stefan; Tripković, Katica title: Health workforce management in the context of the COVID‐19 pandemic: A survey of physicians in Serbia date: 2021-04-04 journal: Int J Health Plann Manage DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3141 sha: 3a01cbf61572070534a9ba0630ee4817061b5d96 doc_id: 867250 cord_uid: 83tsq2ix BACKGROUND & AIM: The study describes the experiences and opinions of Serbian physicians regarding workforce management during the COVID‐19 pandemic. MATERIALS & METHODS: A total of 1553 licensed physicians (65% males; average age 44.0 years) responded to an online survey in September 2020. Differences in the respondents' general data and attitudes regarding workforce management and outbreak preparedness in Serbia were analysed in relation to their engagement during the COVID‐19 pandemic (Pearson χ2 and the independent samples t‐test, p < 0.05). The logistic regression model explained the need for changing health workforce management. RESULTS: The results reveal that the physicians engaged in the fight against the spread of COVID‐19 (64.4% of the respondents) more often than their counterparts, were clinicians from the public sector, younger, with less work experience, influenced negatively by the pandemic, and reassigned to other positions (p < 0.001). Health workers dissatisfied with workplace preparedness and those reassigned due to COVID‐19 were by 2.61 times and 1.38 times, respectively, more likely than their counterparts to consider changes in health workforce management. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION: COVID‐19 underlines the need for changes in health workforce management during public health emergencies. An internal incident management team and a panel of external experts may support health workforce management during the prolonged and rapidly changing crises. The coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) disease (COVID-19) is a multifaceted disease whose persistent transmission throughout the year 2020 has shaken the whole world and has brought uncertainty to everyone. pandemic has profound implications regarding the health workforce, in terms of the rapid deployment of remote and flexible work arrangements to meet medium-term needs and long-term goals and in terms of reliable and transparent calibration of responses to balance short-term pressures. 1 Since its appearance in December 2019, healthcare system stakeholders have been continuously examining and adjusting regulations to attain and expand the healthcare workforce capacity to fight against the COVID-19 pandemic, 2 ensure the necessary continuity of healthcare provision better prevent COVID-19 transmission, and secure the medical supply chain for the treatment of patients with COVID-19. [3] [4] [5] [6] Responsive anticipation and adoption of adjustments and innovations in the workforce management and planning systems and regulations might be necessary to enable a timely and continuous strengthening of the healthcare workforce capacity as well as an equitable delivery of healthcare services. Management at all healthcare system levels needs the necessary support to align its needs and priorities with the well-being of the workforce and reduce the risks and threats to overall health outcomes. This is particularly important given the evidence showing that relaxing various public health measures against COVID-19 increases the risk of new waves of infection across countries, thus requiring the lasting endurance of health workers. 7, 8 The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the healthcare workforce capacity, competencies, performance, safety and motivation may require a different set of management skills. 1, 9 According to the latest report on the Human Capital Index, 10 the COVID-19 economic shock is expected to affect child mortality and child health through disrupted coverage and reductions in health services due to healthcare workforce and supply chain issues in healthcare systems. The comprehensive role of healthcare managers during the COVID-19 pandemic is emphasized by their responsibility for providing equitable access to quality and safe healthcare services for various vulnerable population groups (e.g., persons requiring long-term care and migrants), for preserving the health of personnel at risk of contracting the COVID-19 infection, and for coordinating and organizing multidisciplinary teams for the purpose of the timely achievement of necessary productivity and efficiency. Therefore, research on healthcare workforce management in the context of COVID-19 and the specificities of the country, healthcare system and culture, is an opportunity to learn about management and workplace preparedness and to understand the need for replacing inefficient practices with innovative ones. In this study, the focus is on physicians' opinions and views on workforce management in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of the study was to gain insight into the experiences and opinions of physicians regarding workforce management during the COVID-19 outbreak. The study findings can inform stakeholder strategic and tactical efforts in this rapidly changing epidemic. DINIĆ ET AL. In Serbia, a country in Southeast Europe, news of the SARS-Cov-2 virus became topical in December 2019 and January 2020. The state of emergency and measures taken in China, as well as the sharp rise in the number of infected people in Italy, produced apocalyptic scenes observed by Serbian viewers in disbelief. Just before the outbreak, the Law on Health Care and the Law on Health Insurance were changed in Serbia. 11 Their adoption initiated the process of amendment of most bylaws. These regulatory changes were planned to affect the work and organisation of institutions. The changes with the greatest impact were the transfer of founding rights (from local government to the republic level) and the method of financing. Not all of the bylaws were amended and harmonised with the laws in force, in 2020. Institutions at the secondary and tertiary levels have started implementing funding based on the diagnosis-related group method of calculation, while at the level of primary health care, there has been a change in the capitation formula. Shortly after the World Health Organization (WHO) declared a pandemic, Serbia registered 135 infected patients and its first death due to COVID-19, and an epidemic and state of emergency were declared. 12 Decisions made during the state of emergency included the establishing of temporary COVID-19 hospitals, the introduction of bans and restrictions on movement, central distribution of consumables, the abolition of election programs, the introduction of COVID-19 treatment protocols, the decision on remunerating 100% sick leave to health workers suffering from COVID-19 and a regulation on a 10% salary supplement to all healthcare employees. [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] By the end of March 2020, more than 300 diaspora medical workers applied to return to the country. 18 During the pandemic, the Minister of Health sent a letter to the directors of institutions founded by the Republic of Serbia to ban additional engagement of health workers by a second employer. Private practices and private healthcare institutions have not been systematically involved in the organized fight against COVID-19. According to the records of the Serbian Medical Chamber, Serbia has about 30,000 licensed and professionally active physicians (of whom 60% are specialists) working in the public and private healthcare sector (86% and 14%, respectively). Those who were on the front line of the response to the COVID-19 pandemic were likely to become 'second victims' 19 because they may have become exposed and quarantined, or may have been infected or sick. 20 For 10 months now, the same individuals, in some cases from dual-doctor households, have been working in very demanding circumstances in healthcare facilities; many healthcare workers have had extended working hours, and they have been under pressure to make quick decisions regarding several patients at the same time and have felt a decrease in morale. 21 They are at risk of suffering from anxiety, depression or insomnia. [21] [22] [23] [24] These facts support the research on the policies and regulations urgently needed to regulate the organisation, support, workload balance, recognition and safety of the health professionals. 22 The attention given to health workforce issues is considered a success factor in the implementation of health policies. 25, 26 Levels of the healthcare workers preparedness for the COVID-19 outbreak are unknown 27 while effective health workforce management during the COVID-19 pandemic poses a challenge. 9, 28, 29 The pandemic is also a challenge for frontline physicians who lack the expertise in infectious diseases management and intensive care 94 -DINIĆ ET AL. and are faced with a work environment that includes the risk of contracting a severe infection, such as COVID-19. 30, 31 During the SARS epidemic, both health workers and SARS survivors experienced mental health problemselevated levels of stress and psychological distress. 32 However, 1 year after the epidemic, higher pressure and psychological distress levels in healthcare workers than in non-health workers were registered among SARS survivors. 32 The Ebola outbreak changed health workers' professional lives and made them feel scared, sad, depressed, isolated, lonely and stigmatized. [33] [34] [35] In Serbia's public healthcare sector, the capacity for modern health workforce management 25 is reduced to personnel administration. 11 In light of the legislative framework, 11 crisis management and planning in Serbia's healthcare facilities need to be strengthened before, during and after the crisis. A recent study has shown that a hospital lacked a hazard-specific, emergency and disaster response plan, even 5 years after. 36 The COVID-19 pandemic is a type of natural experiment 37 in which researchers did not manipulate either exposure to the coronavirus or intervention of interest. As in all real-life experiments, the intervention's effect can be identified using an observational approach involving the comparison of exposed and unexposed participants. In this study, the exposed participants were physicians engaged in the fight against COVID-19 versus the unexposed participants, that is, the non-engaged participants. The intervention's studied effect is the physicians' opinion and experiences regarding the preparedness for COVID-19 and health workforce management. The intervention is the health workforce management and training and safety measures during the COVID-19 in Serbia, guided mainly by the COVID-19 protocols. It goes beyond assessment based on routinely collected data on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the health workforce, which may be restrained or time consuming. In the cross-sectional design and natural experiments, an accurate assessment of the relationship between the studied independent variables and the respondents' opinions as a dependent variable is multivariate regression analyses. 37 Little is known about health workers actively engaged during epidemics or other emergencies, as compared to those not engaged in these emergencies. In a study on the willingness to respond to emergencies, females and personnel under the age of 40 were the staff most prone to absenteeism. 39 The evidence published before this study shows that unlike women who have schoolchildren, clinical workers and those familiar with the emergency plan are more likely to be willing to be mobilised in an emergency. 40 A systematic review and meta-analysis 41 found that men, physicians, full-time employees, who perceived personal safety and risk of a pandemic, confidence in individual skills and who were trained to respond had a significantly increased readiness to work during a pandemic. Therefore, in our study of the opinions and experiences related to the COVID-19 pandemic, the role of sex and age of physicians as cultural and social variables 42 is explored among other independent variables. The study findings on the relevance of respondents' variables could contribute to a better understanding of mobilized and redeployed frontline physicians and the needed workplace changes during a crisis. 40 statements (contact details known only to the Medical Chamber of Serbia), information on the management and use of the data and information stating that participation in the study was voluntary and anonymous (no personal identification). Therefore, the respondents who decided to fill out the questionnaire and send the answers also gave their consent to participate in the study and allowed their data to be used in scientific publications. The population of interest in the study covered all physicians in Serbia, currently licensed by the Serbian Medical Chamber. In this study, the voluntary response sample consisted of a total of 1553 licensed physicians, who completed the online questionnaire. Respondent variables of interest were grouped as general characteristics (sex, age, marital status, education level, work experience and type of workplace), job satisfaction (dissatisfied/mostly dissatisfied vs. mostly satisfied/satisfied), opinion regarding the degree of impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on everyday operation at the respondent's workplace (on the scale from no/minimal impact vs. medium/major impact), and type of impact (positive vs. negative), professional preparedness for pandemics (dissatisfied/mostly dissatisfied vs. mostly satisfied/satisfied), being reassigned to another work position (yes vs. no) and the opinion regarding the necessary changes in health workforce management (yes, no, do not know) including methods of workforce requirements planning, education and training, recruitment and dismissal, organizational models, workload measurement, performance assessment, reward and incentive system, payment and compensation, and control) during the COVID-19 pandemic and engagement in the work with SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. Also, the study describes the sex compositions of the group of physicians who were reassigned to different workplaces during the COVID-19 pandemic and of those who were trained in the use of personal protective equipment. It also provides information regarding the availability and utilization of the appropriate PPE. The study instrument was constructed on the basis of the questionnaires used for risk assessment and management of the exposure of healthcare workers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic 24 and human resource management. 46 Statistical analyses in the study included the analysis of the respondents' differences (Pearson χ2 and the independent samples t-test); all tests were set at the significance level p < 0.005. Logistic regression models (odds ratio, and 95% confidence interval) were used to identify a significant univariate and multivariate association between the outcome variable (necessary changes in health workforce management: yes vs. no/do not know) and explanatory variables (all other variables observed in the study). All analyses were performed with the IBM SPSS ver. 25. Among 1553 study respondents, there were more males, married persons, specialists, and physicians working in public hospitals. The mean age was 44; the average work experience was 16 years. More respondents were satisfied with the job and job preparedness for pandemics and had the opinion that the COVID-19 pandemic had a major negative job impact and did not change the work position due to the pandemic (Table 1) . Physicians engaged in the fight against COVID-19 (64.4% of the total number) differed significantly from their colleagues without such engagement (p < 0.001). More of them were young (the mean age was 42 vs. 47 years) and less-experienced physicians (mean work experience was 14 vs. 19.5 years). Non-specialists were more often engaged (over one-third of all physicians engaged in the fight against COVID-19 vs. less than one-quarter of their counterparts). Almost half of them are employed at secondary and tertiary public healthcare institutions (47.6%). T A B L E 1 General characteristics of the respondents-physicians, according to their engagement in the work with patients with COVID-19 In the public healthcare sector, the share of primary healthcare physicians within the group of those engaged in the fight against COVID-19 versus their counterparts was significantly higher (over two-fifth vs. over one-quarter). Among the personnel engaged in the fight against COVID-19, there were almost five times less physicians from private and other sectors than among those who did not treat SARS-CoV-2-positive patients (p < 0.001). A lower share of personnel engaged in the fight against COVID-19 as compared to their counterparts expressed satisfaction with the job and with professional preparedness for pandemics (p < 0.001). A major impact on the job and reassignment to another work position due to the pandemic was reported more by the personnel engaged in the fight against COVID-19 (78% and 51.1%, respectively) than by their counterparts (59.2% and 6.1%, respectively) (p < 0.001). Among the physicians who worked with SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, some more men than women were reassigned to a different work position due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Also, despite the fact that many physicians had access to the appropriate PPE to use on daily basis, they were not trained to use the equipment (Table 2) . Women less frequently than men used PPE as recommended (p = 0.013) ( Table 2) . Opinions on the need for change differ significantly among physicians who were and who were not engaged in the fight against COVID-19 in their workplace. Most of the study respondents (about or over two-thirds of them) perceive the need for change in workforce management, methods of workforce requirements planning, education and training, recruitment and dismissal, organizational models, workload measurement, performance assessment, the reward and incentive system, payment and compensation and control in order to be able to address COVID-19 appropriately (Table 3) . However, there were significantly more physicians with such perception among those who treated SARS-CoV-2-positive patients than among their counterparts (p < 0.05). There was a significant correlation between the respondents' opinions on the necessary changes in workforce management and the workforce requirements planning, education and training, recruitment and dismissal models, organization, workload measurement, performance assessment, the reward and incentive system, payment and compensation and control (Appendix 1). Therefore, the univariate and multivariate logistic regression showed a significant association between the general characteristics of physicians and their opinion on the necessary changes in the management of the healthcare workforce (Table 4) . Physicians dissatisfied with occupational preparedness for pandemics (including COVID-19) in the workplace and who were relocated due to the pandemic were also more likely than their peers to consider the need for On the other hand, there are positive aspects of such a practice, that is, recognition of the reassigned workers' hard work by the society, solidarity between colleagues and implementation of supportive policies. 28 physicians. 51 The additional deployment, for a period of 6 months, of 200 health workers was funded by EU funds, amounting to approximately 1 million euros. 51 These workers primarily assisted in detecting cases in public health institutes. During a pandemic, a serious shortage of medical staff is common. 47 In dealing with COVID-19 frontline health workers, operating in complex and challenging work environments negatively influences their job satisfaction. 29, 56 Physicians in Serbia who work with SARS-CoV-2-positive patients were less satisfied with their job and with professional preparedness for epidemics than their counterparts. The share of dissatisfied physicians in the study was higher than recent estimates, but dissatisfaction with the job in the public healthcare sector has a variable trend over the last 5 years. 57 In contrast, health workers in China expressed a higher level of job satisfaction during the pandemic. However, Chinese healthcare workers with a higher level of education were more dissatisfied, which partially confirms our results. 29 In Jordan, only 28.2% of physicians expressed satisfaction with the epidemic prevention policies at their facilities. 58 Bearing in mind the well documented direct association of job satisfaction with the effectiveness of measures for improving control of major crises, tailoring strategies according to reasonable demands of frontline physicians would be of great importance for ensuring their full dedication to the fight against COVID-19 29 . For pandemic preparedness, proper use of PPE is just as important as its availability. There is consistency in literature findings about the relationship between the access to appropriate PPE and the benefits to the mental health of health workers, improved job satisfaction, and an increased feeling of safety and confidence. 59 In addition to the shortage in equipment supplies that many facilities worldwide have suffered, there are difficulties with its rational and adequate use. 58, 60 In that respect, this study has shown that Serbia is not different from other countries. Findings from other studies have suggested several factors influencing the healthcare workers' adherence to guidelines and recommendations for PPE use, including unclear and inconsistent information, lack of training and education, as well as the characteristics of the equipment itself, in terms of its size and quality. 61 This study has shown that female frontline physicians have used PPE as recommended less frequently than male physicians. Female staff in the United Kingdom also struggle with PPE, considering it too large and uncomfortable. 28 Without effective administrative and engineering controls, and aggressive testing, PPE has a limited benefit as it is the weakest component in the hierarchy of infection prevention and control measures. 62 The quality of the facility infrastructure and its state of repair also matters. For example, during the Ebola epidemic, poor and inadequate PPE and guidelines, combined with a poor workplace setting, resulted in 'disaster in a disaster' due to the incubation of the disease in hospitals and outbreak intensification among employees. 63 In Serbia, many inpatient care institutions in the public sector date from the 1980s and are under renovation, 11 implicating that the Our study has revealed that, among the physicians working with SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, there were more men, but female respondents were more likely to express the need for change in the workforce management. Other studies have confirmed that more male physicians have been engaged as a frontline medical staff in fighting against COVID-19, but also that they fell more prepared for that than female physicians. 58, 64 Similarly to our study, a study carried out during the pandemic of influenza A H1N1 in Hong Kong covered predominantly physicians engaged in public primary healthcare clinics, who were younger male staff and specialists. 65 However, the majority of the health workforce is made up of women, which makes them particularly vulnerable to the risks posed by the pandemic. 66 As female physicians spend more time at home, they are more burdened by household activities and family concerns (caring for children, elderly parents, etc.). 64, 67, 68 They also often face high risk of income loss and an increased risk of violence, and also suffer more from insomnia and anxiety. 66, 67 It is essential that policy responses to the pandemic take measures not to exacerbate but to reduce existing gender inequalities. Our study has shown that young, less-experienced physicians, non-specialists from public primary health care, are more engaged in the fight against COVID-19 in Serbia. Physicians engaged in the fight against COVID-19 in Serbia are on average middle aged, with a significant work experience. Also, in other countries, the engagement of young medical staff in the first lines of the fight against COVID-19 is a common practice, which is not surprising, given that increasing age poses the greatest risk of serious illness and death. 58 71 On the other hand, their rich experience makes it easier for them to make clinical decisions in complex situations. 72 Therefore, in strengthening the response to a pandemic, it would be wise to maximize the benefits of the older physicians' experience alongside with the practical training of the young physicians. This study has confirmed previous findings that primary healthcare general practitioners (GPs), as the first point of contact with potentially SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, play an important role in the fight against COVID-19. 71, 73, 74 Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, they have been facing great changes in their work practices, such as an increase in performing patient consultations remotely (as many as 85% of GPs in the United Kingdom perform patient consultations remotely during the pandemic) and shortage of medical staff or PPE. 58, 71, 75 Previous studies have shown that primary health care has generally not shown a high degree of preparedness for response to outbreaks, mostly due to difficulties in supply and use of PPE, lack of support from authorities, lack of experience and training and the psychosocial burden. 76, 77 Flemish GPs, however, have shown a satisfactory level of readiness to respond to the outbreak of the COVID-19 epidemic in its early phase. 74 Timely strategies are needed to reduce the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary health care and its core competencies, ensuring the provision of quality and safe health care. In our study, most frontline physicians fighting against COVID-19, who were dissatisfied with the occupational preparedness for pandemics, relocated due to the pandemic, and from the public sector expressed the need for change in health workforce management. Evidence from the study informs health stakeholders that adjustments to health workforce policy, management, and planning are needed at the institutional level in the public sector, including planning, organization, performance monitoring, reward and control. These issues are particularly relevant bearing in mind the prolonged impact of the COVID-19 pandemic the necessity to prevent healthcare staff exhaustion. Quality health services enable the reduction of disease transmission and rapid recovery, but their provision depends on the accessibility of competent staff, the working conditions and remuneration. 78 Implementing adjustments is a challenge in a rapidly changing context. A promising approach towards an effective and quickly adaptable system response to the COVID-19 dynamic might be an integration of strategic and ongoing problem solving with specifically developed tools and techniques. 2, 9 An internal incident management team and a panel of external experts are suggested as a support for workforce management during a prolonged and rapidly changing pandemic. To facilitate adjustments, health workforce managers could benefit from developing an internal incident management team of medical specialists in various disciplines, such as emergency and internal medicine, intensive care medicine, microbiology, preventive medicine, occupational health and geriatrics. 2 The internal incident management team's role would be to optimize service delivery modalities, speed up information sharing and decision-making, and foster links with individual health workers and other providers, and facilitate communication with patients' families. High-level stakeholders should be supported by an external panel of experts with a mission to regularly provide them with sound and independent evidence and advice on both shortterm and long-term policies, procedures and protocols, resources and methods for the following: � adaptable health workforce organisation to enable a rebalancing of staffing needs to workload, for example, task-shifting, up-skilling, skill-mixing, establishing new staffing levels; and � sustainability, for example, estimating health workforce requirements through modelling and scenario planning, monitoring and evaluating health workforce response. The study has several limitations. The study sample may be biased, if the physicians who had the time to respond to the survey share similar opinions or find the topic interesting as compared to the rest of the physicians. The response rate, cannot be established, since it is not known how many of around thirty thousand licensed physicians' email addresses from the records of the Serbian Medical Chamber, are, in fact, valid. The study response group is representative of the physicians' population in regard to the mean age, workplace and education level composition. Therefore, the study findings cannot be generally applied to all physicians in Serbia. However, the sample is sufficiently large and resembles the actual population of interest, the survey instrument is reliable and the models are correct. The cross-sectional design could not examine any cause-and-effect relationship in the study; it did, however, help identify potential predictors of necessary changes in physician workforce management in Serbia. The study was conducted in September 2020, when the national health system was stabilized, in terms of the availability of equipment for personal protection and treatment. Therefore, recent events and experiences during the two epidemic peaks may have influenced the type of response. Indeed, the study attempts to capture the difference in the response that reflects the experience of treating patients with COVID-19. COVID-19 had a significant negative job impact on the frontline and reassigned physicians. They feel the need for a change in workforce management and dissatisfaction with the job and professional readiness for epidemics. Appropriate personal protective equipment is often available but not the training for its use. Women use personal protective equipment less appropriately than men. DINIĆ ET AL. -105 The study findings indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic has underlined the need for change in health workforce management during public health emergencies. An internal incident management team and a panel of external experts may provide the necessary tools and guidelines to plan, monitor and manage the health workforce during prolonged and rapidly changing pandemics. Stakeholders can benefit from the application of evidence that these bodies generate in the decision-making process in the next stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as in future public health crises. A P P E N D I X 1 Correlation matrix of the respondents' opinions on the necessary changes in workforce management and workforce requirements planning, education and training, recruitment and dismissal models, organisation, workload measurement, performance assessment, reward and incentive system, payment and compensation and control Workforce Principles for the COVID-19 Pandemic. Stakeholder Capitalism in a Time of Crises Health Workforce Policy and Management in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic Response. Interim Guidance. Geneva: World Health Organization Ensuring and sustaining a pandemic workforce The human touch -addressing health care's workforce problem amid the pandemic Transforming global health with AI Strengthening the Health System Response to COVID-19: Recommendations for the WHO European Region. Policy Brief. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe Social stability challenged by Covid-19: pandemics, inequality and policy responses Modeling and analysis of different scenarios for the spread of COVID-19 by using the modified multi-agent systems -evidence from the selected countries The COVID-19 pandemic presents an opportunity to develop more sustainable health workforces The Human Capital Index 2020 Update: Human Capital in the Time of COVID-19 Copenhagen: World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe The President of the Republic of Serbia, the Speaker of the National Assembly and the Prime Minister Declared, by the Decision on Declaration of the State of Emergency COVID-19 in the Republic of Serbia The Government of the Republic of Serbia Decree on Measures for Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases COVID-19. Off. Gazette of RS 66 Rulebook on Preventive Measures for Safe and Healthy Work to Prevent the Occurrence and Spread of the Infectious Disease Epidemic Decree on the Establishment of a Temporary Registry and the Method of Payment of One-Time Financial Assistance to All Adult Citizens of the Republic of Serbia in Order to Reduce the Negative Effects Caused by the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic COVID-19 The Point of Return COVID-19 confessions: a qualitative exploration of healthcare workers' experiences of working with COVID-19 Understanding Mexican health worker COVID-19 deaths Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis How might the NHS protect the mental health of health-care workers after the COVID-19 crisis? Managing mental health challenges faced by healthcare workers during covid-19 pandemic Risk Assessment and Management of Exposure of Health Care Workers in the Context of COVID-19: Interim Guidance Human resources for health policies: a critical component in health policies Health sector reform and human resources: lessons from the United Kingdom COVID-19: how prepared are front-line healthcare workers in England? Perceptions and experiences of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK Factors associated with job satisfaction of frontline medical staff fighting against COVID-19: a cross-sectional study in China. Front Public Health The experiences of health-care providers during the COVID-19 crisis in China: a qualitative study Five essential principles of post-disaster psychosocial care: looking back and forward with Stevan Hobfoll Stress and psychological distress among SARS survivors 1 Year after the outbreak Mental health care during the Ebola virus disease outbreak in Sierra Leone Health workers' experiences of coping with the Ebola epidemic in Sierra Leone's health system: a qualitative study Healthcare providers on the frontlines: a qualitative investigation of the social and emotional impact of delivering health services during Sierra Leone's Ebola epidemic Evaluating a primary healthcare centre's preparedness for disasters using the hospital safety index: lessons learned from the 2014 floods in Obrenovac, Serbia Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new Medical Research Council guidance Developing organizational learning in the NHS Healthcare workers' willingness to respond following a disaster: a novel statistical approach toward data analysis Survey of hospital employees' personal preparedness and willingness to work following a disaster Healthcare workers' willingness to work during an influenza pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Influenza Other Respir Viruses Age, sex, and cultural differences in the meaning and dimensions of achievement Health care management during covid-19: insights from complexity science. NEJM Catal Innov Care Deliv Hospital disaster staffing: if you call, will they come? Working conditions and health status of 6,317 front line public health workers across five provinces in China during the COVID-19 epidemic: a cross-sectional study A three-component conceptualization of organisational commitment Maintaining Essential Health Services: Operational Guidance for the COVID-19 Context: Interim Guidance. World Health Organization Rapidly organize redeployed medical staff in coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: what we should do Cross-Country Analysis: What strategies are countries using to expand health workforce surge capacity to treat COVID-19 patients? World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe Psychosocial support for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic Chapter 2 -Section 2.2. COVID-19 Health System Response Monitor of the WHO Regional Office for Europe. The European Commission, and the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Mapping the governance of human resources for health in Serbia Strengthening the public health workforce: an estimation of the long-term requirements for public health specialists in Serbia Implementation of the workload indicators of staffing need (WISN) method in determining staff requirements in public health laboratories in Serbia The relationship between dual practice, intention to work abroad and job satisfaction: a population-based study in the Serbian public healthcare sector The prevalence of stress, anxiety and depression within front-line healthcare workers caring for COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-regression Analysis of Satisfaction of Employees in State Health Institutions, Republic of Serbia Preparedness of frontline doctors in Jordan healthcare facilities to COVID-19 outbreak Rapid Expert Consultation on Understanding Causes of Health Care Worker Deaths Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic Critical supply shortages-the need for ventilators and personal protective equipment during the covid-19 pandemic Barriers and facilitators to healthcare workers' adherence with infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines for respiratory infectious diseases: a rapid qualitative evidence synthesis Strengthening the Health System Response to COVID 19. Creating Surge Capacity for Acute and Intensive Care. Technical Working Guidance Number 2. Copenhagen: WHO Covid-19: protecting frontline healthcare workers-what lessons can we learn from Ebola? BMJ Open Insomnia and stress of physicians during COVID-19 outbreak Primary care physicians' response to pandemic influenza in Hong Kong: a mixed quantitative and qualitative study Women at the Core of the Fight against Covid-19 Crisis Women physicians and the COVID-19 pandemic COVID-19: Protecting Workers in the Workplace Women Health Workers: Working Relentlessly in Hospitals and at Home. ILO. Comment Older clinicians and the surge in novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Prevalence and influencing factors of anxiety and depression symptoms in the first-line hospital staff fighting against COVID-19 in Gansu An Italian sacrifice to the COVID-19 epidemic Analysis of the job satisfaction of medical staff in county-level public hospitals and the associated influencing factors How should front-line general practitioners use personal protective equipment (PPE)? Malays Fam Physician Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the core functions of primary care: will the cure be worse than the disease? A qualitative interview study in Flemish GPs Covid-19: how coronavirus will change the face of general practice forever Response of general practitioners to infectious disease public health crises: an integrative systematic review of the literature Influenza pandemic 2009/A/H1N1 management policies in primary care: a comparative analysis of three countries Health workforce management in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey of physicians in Serbia The authors express gratitude to all physicians who have participated in the study.This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The Ethics Committee of the Serbian Medical Chamber approved the cross-sectional study design and purpose and the questionnaire (Decision No: 1462/15 September 2020). The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.