key: cord-0857102-3ntn4iwl authors: Feng, Li; Yin, Yuan-Yuan; Liu, Cong-Hui; Xu, Ke-Ren; Li, Qing-Run; Wu, Jia-Rui; Zeng, Rong title: Proteome-wide Data Analysis Reveals Tissue-specific Network Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Infection date: 2020-07-08 journal: J Mol Cell Biol DOI: 10.1093/jmcb/mjaa033 sha: 8dc50626f6fff1ed66763eac06ff9ab8b707dfbb doc_id: 857102 cord_uid: 3ntn4iwl For patients with COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2, the damages to multiple organs have been clinically observed. Since most of current investigations for virus-host interaction are based on cell level, there is an urgent demand to probe tissue-specific features associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Based on collected proteomic datasets from human lung, colon, kidney, liver and heart, we constructed a virus-receptor network, a virus-interaction network and a virus-perturbation network. In the tissue-specific networks associated with virus-host crosstalk, both common and different key hubs are revealed in diverse tissues. Ubiquitous hubs in multiple tissues such as BRD4 and RIPK1 would be promising drug targets to rescue multi-organ injury and deal with inflammation. Certain tissue-unique hubs such as REEP5 might mediate specific olfactory dysfunction. The present analysis implies that SARS-CoV-2 could affect multi-targets in diverse host tissues, and the treatment of COVID-19 would be a complex task. The outbreak of COVID-19 caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has gradually expanded to pandemic (Wang et al., 2020a; WHO, 2020b) , due to the strong infectivity of the virus. It is an urgent demand to explore the mechanism of infection and treatment of the disease. According to the clinical observation, approximately 14% experienced severe disease and 5% were critically ill (WHO, 2020a) . In addition to the typical symptoms of pulmonary infection, severe patients also show damage to multiple organs, including kidney, liver and heart etc. (Wang et al., 2020b) . In order to better understand the mechanism of viral infection and to treat patients more specifically, it is a matter of concern whether there are differences in the susceptibility and response of different organs to the virus. Since ACE2 is the major receptor mediating virus entry to host cell, previous studies mostly focused on transcription level on ACE2 (Zou et al., 2020) . However, the well-known discordance of transcriptome and proteome level proposes that study at the protein level could reveal the direct circumstances of host responses to virus infection. Moreover, the protein-protein interaction triggered by virus invasion and replication in host cells would be complex and tissue-specific. There are hundreds of proteins could interact or perturbated by virus, while the drugs should work on major players. Thus, the network analysis is more helpful to understand virus perturbation and select drugs. Due to the similarity of spike protein in coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 could invade in host cells possibly like SARS-CoV, through three potential receptors namely ACE2, DC-SIGN (genotype CD209) and L-SIGN (genotype CLEC4M) (Cai et al., 2020) . In addition, TMPRSS2 has been reported to prime the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 (Hoffmann et al., 2020) . When virus entered host cells, a number of host proteins could be hijacked and regulated to facilitate virus activity, which could be detected by proteomic approach. Most recent study revealed interactome of SARS-CoV-2 in 293T cells using AP-MS technology (Gordon et al., 2020) . Another work identified proteins in host cells regulated by SARS-CoV-2 infection (Bojkova et al., 2020) . However, these studies based on cells could not provide specific features of diverse tissues. In order to extend the cell-based data to tissue-specific mode, we collected population-based proteomic datasets, from human lung (Mertins et al., 2018) , colon (Vasaikar et al., 2019) , kidney (Clark et al., 2019) , liver (Gao et al., 2019) and heart (Doll et al., 2017) . The first four datasets are from the National Cancer Institute Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) which include various normal tissues. Data from hearts include two parts, from cavities and vessels. Based on the protein-protein interaction (PPI) skeleton or protein-protein expression correlation, we construct the first tissuespecific proteome-wide network associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. First, we checked RNA and antibody-based protein data for three receptors and TMPRSS2, from a variety of tissues in the human protein atlas database (https://www.proteinatlas.org/). We can clearly see that ACE2 has high transcription level in gastrointestinal tract, kidney and bladder, liver and gallbladder, male tissue (including ductus deferens, testis, epididymis, seminal vesicle and prostate) and muscle tissue ( Figure 1A ). CD209 has higher RNA levels in adipose, soft tissue, bone marrow and lymphoid tissue ( Figure 1B ). CLEC4M has more RNA transcription in bone marrow, lymphoid tissue, liver and gallbladder tissue ( Figure 1C ). The transcription level of the three receptors in lung is not high. In addition, the expression level of protein is not consistent with the transcription level of RNA in most tissues. For example, in lung tissue which we are concerned about, the expression of CD209 and CLEC4M is found ( Figure 1B and C). However, the expression of ACE2 is still undetectable in lung by antibody ( Figure 1A ). In addition, CD209 has protein expression in bone marrow and lymphoid tissue ( Figure 1B ), CLEC4M in brain and gastrointestinal tract ( Figure 1C ), ACE2 in gastrointestinal tract, liver and gallbladder, kidney and bladder, male tissue as well as endocrine tissue ( Figure 1A ). Compared to the three receptors, TMPRSS2 has higher RNA transcription levels and protein expression levels in more tissues. In lung, a certain degree of RNA transcription can be observed but no protein expression has been observed. Higher RNA transcription and protein expression can be observed in gastrointestinal tract, male tissues, and pancreas. Although RNA transcription levels are not very high in kidney, urinary bladder, and endocrine tissues, there are still high protein expression levels ( Figure 1D ). The obvious discordance between RNA and proteins demonstrates that it is essential to measure protein expression itself in different tissues, in order to evaluate the influence by SARS-CoV-2 in human body. Then, we collected mass spectrometry-based proteomic data of normal tissue of four organs from CPTAC database and a set of data of the normal heart (Doll et al., 2017) , including two parts respectively from cavities and vessels. We constructed PPI network with the three potential receptors and TMPRSS2 as the center. The correlation between each two proteins across individuals in each dataset was used as the weight of the edge. Each kind of tissue has its specific network structure. First, we notice that ACE2 and CD209 could be detected in all tissues, and the expression of CLEC4M is only observed in liver (Figure 2A ). The number of protein-protein pairs in each tissue network ranges from 33 to 55, with the least in lung network and the most in liver network ( Figure 2A ). Specifically, we focus on the interaction between three potential receptors. ACE2 and CD209 are positively correlated in lung, colon and two parts of heart, cavities and vessels. They are negatively correlated in liver and kidney, suggesting that there may be some competition or substitution between the two receptors in these two organs. The correlation between CLEC4M and CD209 is positive in liver while both of them show negative correlation with ACE2 ( Figure 2A) . Assumingly, the virus entry to liver cell might also be through CLEC4M and CD209 coordination. On the whole, there are more positive correlations between the receptor and other proteins in most tissues, which means that there is a possibility that after the virus binds to the receptor, it is easy to coordinate the network partners, such as the correlation between ACE2 and AGT. Some correlations change in different tissues, such as CD209-KRAS correlation is positive in lung and liver, but is negative in colon, kidney and heart ( Figure 2A ). There are a lot of differences between heart cavities and vessels, indicating the different reactions of the two parts of heart. According to the threshold we set, TMPRSS2 is not associated with the three receptors in the String database and TMPRSS2 was not found in two tissues of the heart. However, according to the previous report (Hoffmann et al., 2020) , TMPRSS2 is an important protein for initiating the S protein of SARS-CoV-2, we assume there are some connections between the two proteins, so the connection between ACE2 and TMPRSS2 is added on the network. Unexpectedly, the ACE2 and TMPRSS2 showed negative correlation in all tissues. In lung, the correlation between TMPRSS2 and ACE2 was found to be weakly negative (Pearson correlation coefficient -0.191, p value 0.237). Considering the mixed population, the relationship between TMPRSS2 and ACE2 might be affected by various factors such as age, we divided the population into young and elderly group at the age of 55 years old, and the numbers of two groups are 16 and 86. TMRPSS2 and ACE2 have a strong negative correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient -0.596, p value 0.069) in the young group, and a weak positive correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.121, p value 0.525) in the elderly group ( Figure 2B ). These observations may interpret the different responses to SARS-CoV-2 in young and elderly population. In lung and colon, we found a positive correlation between TMPRSS2 and TMPRSS4 (Figure 2A) , which may indicate a synergistic effect of these two serine proteases (TMPRSSs) in the above tissues. A most recent study revealed the interactome of SARS-CoV-2 proteins in 293T cells using AP-MS technology, including 332 proteins with 66 targets by 69 available drugs (Gordon et al., 2020) . In the 332 proteins interacted with SARS-CoV-2, 188 of them may interact with the major virus components. We searched for the existence of the 188 proteins in each kind of tissue respectively, and then calculated the correlation between each two proteins. We took the relationship with a p-value less than 0.01 as a relatively reliable relationship. The top hubs were defined by ranking according to the numbers of connections with other proteins. The top 5 hubs and the top 10 drug target proteins were selected to construct the tissue-specific network (Figure 3 ). Hubs often interact with E, N, M and nsp7,8,12,13 proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Some of these hubs are potential drug targets, such as BRD4, ATP6V1A, PTGES2, RIPK1, etc. (Supplementary Table S1 ). Each network contains at least one hub that can be targeted by available drugs, which provides a reference for accurate medication. Each tissue shows specific structure of network, indicating the complex interaction of virus with different tissues. In lung, drug-targeting hubs such as BRD4, ATP6V1A, and RIPK1, have extensive interactions with other proteins, and these interactions are mainly positively related, so inhibiting these hubs might be crucial to regulate virus-host interaction ( Figure 3 ). BRD4 could interact with viral structural E protein, and RIPK interacts with nsp12. Viral nsp12 and E proteins are vital components for SARS-CoV-2 replication and package. Another hub REEP5, which interacts with viral structural M protein and is only found as hub in lung, seems playing unique function in lung-related tissues. In addition, FYCO1, PABPC1, CYB5R3, RNT4 and other proteins repeatedly appear as hubs in a variety of tissues. Although there are no suitable drugs to target these proteins, they may play an important role in the infection and pathogenesis of the virus. Next, we extracted 45 up-regulated proteins in host cells affected by 24-hour SARS-CoV-2 infection from a recently reported dataset (Bojkova et al., 2020) . By analyzing the proteomic data of different tissues, 30 to 42 differential proteins were matched in various tissues. After calculating the correlation between the proteins, the edge of correlation networks with a p value less than 0.01 was taken as a reliable edge. Ranging from 54 to 433, the number of edges of networks varies greatly. Both of the two networks of heart are small, in which the smallest is cavity network with only 54 edges. In comparison, the largest is the liver network that contains 433 edges (Supplementary Figure S1 ). We extracted the five nodes with the highest degree from each network as hubs, and only take the edges related to these hubs to construct the core sub-network. Consistent with the overall networks, the core sub-networks have fewer edges in heart, while the kidney and liver core sub-networks have more edges. It is worth noting that multiple hubs appear multiple times in different tissues, such as ANXA2, GYG1, YWHAZ, KRT7, ACTB, etc. These proteins may play an important role in the process of viral infection and pathogenicity (Supplementary Figure S2) . We combined the top 10 proteins with the highest degree in the virus-interaction network (Supplementary Table S2 ) and the top 10 proteins with the highest degree in the virus-perturbation network as the core proteins, and only kept the edges that connected each two core proteins. Since the dominant edge in some networks is the positively correlated edge, we filtered out the negatively correlated edge. All the edges can be seen in Supplementary Figure S3 . It can be seen that there are also interactions between the nodes obtained from the two datasets. In addition to the nodes mentioned before, proteins such as RNT4 and PTBP1 also appeared in the networks of different tissues more than once and are worthy of further study ( Figure 4A ). In addition, by analyzing the same set of data from Bojkova et al.'s work, we identified changes of hubs essential for lung at different time points after SARS-CoV-2 infection. After 24 hours of infection, the overall abundances of BRD4 and RIPK1 slightly increased. In addition, the expression level of REEP5 slightly increased at 10 hours after infection, and then began to decrease after 10 hours ( Figure 4B ). By constructing different networks, we have found several key proteins. Among them, both BRD4 and RIPK1 can interact with SARS-CoV-2 proteins. They are widely found in various organs and tract our attention as drug targets. BRD4 plays an important role in gene expression. It can bind acetylated lysine residues of histones, recruit positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb) to activate RNA polymerase II (RNA Pol II) and start gene transcription ( Figure 5A ). RIPK1 is a double-faced molecule, and its characteristics have been well characterized in the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) signaling cascade. On one hand, it can promote the activation of the NF-κB pathway and regulate the expression of pro-inflammatory genes and pro-survival genes. On the other hand, it can paradoxically participate in FADD-caspase 8-mediated apoptosis and RIPK3-MLKL-mediated necroptosis ( Figure 5B ). RIPK1 is widely expressed in lung and other tissues. It is worthwhile to probe the role of RIPK1 in lung inflammation and injury caused by SARS-CoV-2. In addition, REEP5 as a member of receptor accessory proteins (REEPs) has also attracted our attention because REEPs are related to olfactory signaling pathway ( Figure 5C ). In the proteome data of Caco-2 infected by SARS-CoV-2 (Bojkova et al., 2020), we screened the top10 hubs based on the interaction. Among them, HNRNPC, SRSF1 and HNRNPA3 are related to mRNA processing (Huang et al., 1994; Kohtz et al., 1994; Sébillon et al., 1995; Ma et al., 2002; Kim et al., 2003; Shetty, 2005) . In addition, HK2 plays a role in the initial step of glycolysis (Nawaz et al., 2018) and plays a key role in maintaining the integrity of the outer mitochondrial membrane (Chiara et al., 2008) . The expression changes of these proteins under the influence of SARS-CoV-2 further indicate the extensive effects on cell translation, splicing and metabolism after the virus invades the host cell. However, we found the perturbation of SARS-CoV-2 to host cell is much smaller than SARS-CoV as we reported (Jiang et al., 2005) . The mild disruption to host cell but lasting replication with SARS-CoV-2 itself would make the treatment more complicated and uncertain. In the SARS-CoV-2 protein-protein interaction map data (Gordon et al., 2020 ),we screened the hubs in different tissues based on the interactions. Some of these proteins can be regulated by drugs, including TMEM97, ATP6V1A, FKBP15, PTGES2, RIPK1, and BRD4 (Table S2 ). Among them, TMEM97, FKBP15, PTGES2, and RIPK1 are all related to protein binding. TMEM97 is a conserved integral membrane protein that plays a role in controlling cellular cholesterol levels. In addition, TMEM97 corresponds to the sigma-2 receptor, which is thought to play an important role in regulating cell survival, morphology and differentiation (Bartz et al., 2009; Huang et al., 2014; Guo et al., 2015) . Current drug chloroquine could target to this process, however, TMEM97 is hub only in heart cavities, and sigma receptors are not hubs in any tissue. Thus, the efficiency and safety of chloroquine need more clinical investigations. FKBP15 is involved in the transport of early endosomes at the level of transition between microfilament-based and microtubule-based movement (Viklund et al., 2009) . PTGES2 is the hub in liver. PTGES2 is a membrane-associated protein, and this protein catalyzes the conversion of PGH2 primarily to PGE2 (Watanabe et al., 2003; Watanabe et al., 2008) . ATP6V1A is the hub in kidney, it is catalytic subunit of the peripheral V1 complex of vacuolar ATPase. V-ATPase vacuolar ATPase is responsible for acidifying a variety of intracellular compartments in eukaryotic cells. In aerobic conditions, involved in intracellular iron homeostasis, thus triggering the activity of Fe 2+ prolyl hydroxylase (PHD) enzymes, and leading to HIF1A hydroxylation and subsequent proteasomal degradation (Miles et al., 2017) . (Shi and Vakoc, 2014; Wang and Filippakopoulos, 2015) . Both BRD4 and other members of the BET family can bind histones and nonhistone acetylated lysine residues to regulate genomic activity (Hajmirza et al., 2018) . In terms of transcriptional regulation, two bromine domain modules of BRD4 are involved in the recognition of acetylated lysine. The binding of BRD4 to acetylated histones recruits the positive transcription elongation factor b (P-TEFb) complex to chromatin. BRD4 also mediates the formation of an active form of P-TEFb, which in turn phosphorylates and activates RNA Pol II to initiate gene transcription (Sahai et al., 2016) . The combination of SARS-CoV-2 transmembrane protein E with brominecontaining proteins BRD2 and BRD4 prompted people to speculate that protein E can mimic histone to disrupt its interaction with BRD2 and induce changes in host protein expression, and this change has a beneficial effect on virus proliferation (Gordon et al., 2020) . In our data, compared to BRD2, BRD4 has more general expression and more protein interactions in all tissues. As a hub, BRD4 is affected by SARS-CoV-2, which may lead to more cascade reactions in host cells to adversely affect the host. RIPK1, as a member of the receptor-interacting protein kinase (RIP) family, is the hub in lung. RIPK1 could participate in many important signaling pathways (Holler et al., 2000; Weinlich and Green, 2014; Kondylis, 2017; Wegner et al., 2017) , and also involved with bacterial and viral infection (Cho et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2014; Dondelinger et al., 2019) . Infectious viruses that spread through the respiratory tract can trigger apoptosis or necrosis, causing the death of epithelial cells in the respiratory tract and lung, causing tissues damage and causing serious damage to the host Among them, REEP1 is thought to promote cell surface expression of odorant receptors in 293T cells (Saito et al., 2004) . Olfactory receptors (OR) belong to the G protein coupled receptor family and are expressed in various human tissues including skin (Tsai et al., 2017) . Accessory proteins play an important role in the functional expression of GPCRs on the cell surface (Cooray et al., 2009; Roux and Cottrell, 2014) . Among SARS-CoV-2-positive hospitalized patients, 33.9% of patients developed taste or/and olfactory disorders (Giacomelli et al., 2020) . REEP5 was found in human olfactory cleft mucus as a secreted protein (Yoshikawa et al., 2018) . REEP5 has also been shown to regulate cardiac function, the growth and metastasis of lung cancer cells (Park et al., 2016; Yao et al., 2018) . Whether SARS-CoV-2 infection has an adverse effect on patients' olfactory function is related to the REEP5 or REEP family. It will be an interesting research direction. In addition to the previously demonstrated proteins that can be used as drug targets, some proteins that interact with SARS-CoV-2 protein also deserve attention. Both PABPC1 is hub in colon. PABPC1 can bind to mRNA and regulate mRNA metabolic pathways, it is also related to translation and maintenance of mRNA stability (Grosset et al., 2000; Patel and Bag, 2006; Schäffler et al., 2010; Lim et al., 2014) . RTN4 is hub in colon and heart cavities. Members of the reticulon (RTN) family of proteins influence nuclear envelope expansion, nuclear pore complex formation and proper localization of inner nuclear membrane proteins (Christodoulou et al., 2016) . In addition, knockdown of RTN4-A in cardiomyocytes markedly attenuated hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced apoptosis (Sarkey et al., 2011) . RAB1A is a hub in liver. It mainly regulates the transport of vesicle proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the Golgi compartment and on to the cell surface, and plays a role in the secretion of IL-8 and growth hormone. It is also related to the assembly of autophagosomes and the cellular defense reactions against pathogenic bacteria (Wang et al., 2010; Zhuang et al., 2010; Dong et al., 2012; Mukhopadhyay et al., 2011) . SLC30A9 is a hub found in kidney and acts as a zinc transporter involved in intracellular zinc homeostasis (Perez et al., 2017) . The roles of these host proteins interacting with SARS-CoV-2 proteins in the process of transcription, secretion and apoptosis, suggest that these proteins may be related to the virus propagation process. http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/jmcb By building the networks associated with SARS-CoV-2, we have found some key proteins in the network that frequently appear in different tissues and interact extensively with other proteins. Some of them are common hubs in multiple tissues (such as BRD4 and RIPK1) which could be promising drug targets to rescue multiorgan injury and deal with inflammation. Some of them are tissue-unique hubs such as REEP5, possibly mediating specific phenotype. All these observations will help us to understand the infection and perturbation mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 in different tissues. Since the amount of data in this study is still limited, there is some uncertainty in this network. However, the select data sets with large sample size could largely ensure the reliability of the analysis through horizontal comparison among organs. The proteomewide analysis could provide tissue-specific features associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The perturbation of SARS-CoV-2 to host tissues is multi-targeting and complicated, thus the treatment of COVID-19 would be a complex task. We collected proteomic data of five organs, including four tissues from the National The data downloaded from CPTAC database provides relative protein abundance by sample. The "XXXX Log Ratio" columns contain the relative abundance of sample XXXX and was used in the analysis, with respect to the pooled reference sample, as log ratios (base 2). For the heart data, we used z-scored protein abundances (LFQ intensities). We filtered out proteins with too much NA (NA in 2 / 3 of the samples). The sample size and protein numbers of processed data is in Supplementary Table S3 . Part data used in this publication were generated by the National Cancer Institute Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC). We downloaded the protein and RNA data of a variety of tissues from The Human Protein Atlas database (https://www.proteinatlas.org). For protein data, each bar represents the highest expression score found in a group of tissues. Protein expression scores are based on a best estimate of the "true" protein expression from a knowledgebased annotation. For genes where more than one antibody has been used, a collective score is set displaying the estimated true protein expression. RNA expression summary shows the consensus RNA-data based on normalized expression data from three different sources: internally generated Human Protein Atlas (HPA) RNA-seq data, RNA-seq data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project and CAGE data from FANTOM5 project (https://www.proteinatlas.org/about/assays+annotation#ihk). For PPI networks, we took the 3 receptors and TMPRSS2 to find the relationships in String database (https://string-db.org/). The correlation of score value greater than 0.8 were conserved to build a PPI network and then the Pearson correlation coefficient of each two proteins was calculated. P-value less than 0.05 was considered as significant correlation. We took 332 proteins to calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient of each two proteins and the correlation of P-value less than 0.01 were conserved. Correlation Coefficient more than 0.8 was considered as strong correlation. Then we ranked the proteins by degree and chose the top 10 to check whether they were drug targets. In the 332 proteins interacted with SARS-CoV-2, 188 of them could interact with the major virus components (e.g. SARS-CoV2 E, SARS-CoV2 M, SARS-CoV2 N, SARS-CoV2 nsp12, SARS-CoV2 nsp13, SARS-CoV2 nsp4, SARS-CoV2 nsp6, SARS-CoV2 nsp3, SARS-CoV2 nsp5, SARS-CoV2 nsp7, SARS-CoV2 nsp8, SARS-CoV2 orf3a). We then calculated the Pearson correlation coefficient of each two proteins among the 188 candidates and the correlation of P-value less than 0.01 were conserved. Correlation Coefficient more than 0.8 was considered as strong correlation. Then we ranked the proteins by degree and chose the top 5. The potential drug targets in top 10 of the 332 proteins and the top 5 of the 188 proteins were used as hubs to construct the core sub-networks. Only the hubs and the nodes connected with these hubs are shown in the sub-networks. Due to the large differences in the size of the sub-networks, only 120 edges with the highest correlation coefficient are shown. We took 45 up-regulated proteins to calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient of each two proteins and the correlation of P-value less than 0.01 were conserved. Correlation Coefficient more than 0.8 was considered as strong correlation. In Supplementary Figure S1 , all the edges were shown, while in Supplementary Figure S2 only the edges related to the top 5 nodes with the largest degree were shown. We used the top 10 proteins interacted with the virus ranked by the degree in all 332 proteins and the top 10 proteins changed in the cells infected by the virus as two groups of hubs and constructed the correlation networks only composed by these 20 nodes. The correlation of P-value less than 0.01 were conserved. Correlation Coefficient more than 0.8 was considered as strong correlation. Cytoscape (Shannon et al., 2003) was used to draw the network plots. The red edge in the network indicates a significant or strong positive correlation between the two proteins, pink is a non-significant or weak positive correlation. Dark blue is a significant or strong negative correlation, light blue is a non-significant or weak negative correlation. The thickness of the edge is determined by the correlation coefficient. This work was supported by grant from the Ministry of Science and Technology (2017YFA0505500) and grants from the Strategic CAS Project (XDA12010000, XDB38000000). Reticulum Membrane Sculptor to Modulate Cardiac Function. J Am Heart Assoc 7, e007205. Yoshikawa, K., Wang, H., Jaen, C., Haneoka, M., Saito, N., Nakamura, J., Adappa, N.D., Cohen, N.A., and Dalton, P. (2018) . The human olfactory cleft mucus proteome and its age-related changes. Sci Rep 8, 17170. Zhang, X., Zhang, H., Xu, C., Li, X., Li, M., Wu, X., Pu, W., Zhou, B., Wang, H., Li, D., et al. (2019) . Ubiquitination of RIPK1 suppresses programmed cell death by regulating RIPK1 kinase activation during embryogenesis. Nature communications 10, 4158. Zhuang, X., Adipietro, K.A., Datta, S., Northup, J.K., and Ray, K. (2010) . Rab1 small GTP-binding protein regulates cell surface trafficking of the human calcium-sensing receptor. Endocrinology 151, 5114-5123. Zou, X., Chen, K., Zou, J., Han, P., Hao, J., and Han, Z. (2020) . Single-cell RNA-seq data analysis on the receptor ACE2 expression reveals the potential risk of different human organs vulnerable to 2019-nCoV infection. Front Med. Identification of cholesterolregulating genes by targeted RNAi screening Proteomics of SARS-CoV-2-infected host cells reveals therapy targets A Hint on the COVID-19 Risk: Population Disparities in Gene Expression of Three Receptors of SARS-CoV A novel zinc finger protein interacts with receptor-interacting protein (RIP) and inhibits tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-and IL1-induced NF-kappa B activation Hexokinase II detachment from mitochondria triggers apoptosis through the permeability transition pore independent of voltage-dependent anion channels Phosphorylation-driven assembly of the RIP1-RIP3 complex regulates programmed necrosis and virus-induced inflammation Transmembrane protein TMEM170A is a newly discovered regulator of ER and nuclear envelope morphogenesis in human cells Proteogenomic Characterization of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Accessory proteins are vital for the functional expression of certain G protein-coupled receptors Identification of RIP1 kinase as a specific cellular target of necrostatins Region and cell-type resolved quantitative proteomic map of the human heart Serine 25 phosphorylation inhibits RIPK1 kinase-dependent cell death in models of infection and inflammation NF-κB-Independent Role of IKKα/IKKβ in Preventing RIPK1 Kinase-Dependent Apoptotic and Necroptotic Cell Death during TNF Signaling Structurally Distinct Bacterial TBC-like GAPs Link Arf GTPase to Rab1 Inactivation to Counteract Host Defenses Integrated Proteogenomic Characterization of HBV-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma Regulation of RIPK1 activation by TAK1-mediated phosphorylation dictates apoptosis and necroptosis jmcb and taste disorders in SARS-CoV-2 patients: a cross-sectional study A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing A Mechanism for Translationally Coupled mRNA Turnover: Interaction between the Poly(A) Tail and a c-fos RNA Coding Determinant via a Protein Complex BET Family Protein BRD4: An Emerging Actor in NFκB Signaling in Inflammation and Cancer Receptor interacting protein kinase-3 determines cellular necrotic response to TNFalpha SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor Fas triggers an alternative, caspase-8-independent cell death pathway using the kinase RIP as effector molecule The C-protein tetramer binds 230 to 240 nucleotides of pre-mRNA and nucleates the assembly of 40S heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles Sigma-2 Receptor Ligands and Their Perspectives in Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy Quantitative analysis of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-associated coronavirus-infected cells using proteomic approaches: implications for cellular responses to virus infection Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein C modulates translation of c-myc mRNA in a cell cycle phase-dependent manner Protein-protein interactions and 5'-splice-site recognition in mammalian mRNA precursors RIPK1 and allies in the battle against hepatocyte apoptosis and liver cancer Uridylation by TUT4 and TUT7 marks mRNA for degradation Sigma-2 Receptor Ligands: Neurobiological Effects Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A3, a novel RNA trafficking response element-binding protein Death-domain dimerization Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America Reproducible workflow for multiplexed deep-scale proteome and phosphoproteome analysis of tumor tissues by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry The vacuolar-ATPase complex and assembly factors, TMEM199 and CCDC115, control HIF1α prolyl hydroxylation by regulating cellular iron levels Proteomic analysis of endocytic vesicles: Rab1a regulates motility of early endocytic vesicles The catalytic inactivation of the N-half of human hexokinase 2 and structural and biochemical characterization of its mitochondrial conformation The accessory proteins REEP5 and REEP6 refine CXCR1-mediated cellular responses and lung cancer progression Hereditary spastic paraplegia proteins REEP1, spastin, and atlastin-1 coordinate microtubule interactions with the tubular ER network IMP1 interacts with poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) and the autoregulatory translational control element of PABP-mRNA through the KH III-IV domain SLC30A9 mutation affecting intracellular zinc homeostasis causes a novel cerebro-renal syndrome Cellular Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein cIAP2 Protects against Pulmonary Tissue Necrosis during Influenza Virus Infection to Promote Host Survival G protein-coupled receptors: what a difference a 'partner' makes Targeting BET bromodomain proteins in solid tumors RTP Family Members Induce Functional Expression of Mammalian Odorant Receptors Nogo-A knockdown inhibits hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced activation of mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis in cardiomyocytes A stimulatory role for the La-related protein 4B in translation A T to G mutation in the polypyrimidine tract of the second intron of the human beta-globin gene reduces in vitro splicing efficiency: evidence for an increased hnRNP C interaction Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks Regulation of urokinase receptor mRNA stability by hnRNP C in lung epithelial cells The Mechanisms behind the Therapeutic Activity of BET Bromodomain Inhibition RIP: a novel protein containing a death domain that interacts with Fas/APO-1 (CD95) in yeast and causes cell death Two olfactory receptors-OR2A4/7 and OR51B5-differentially affect epidermal proliferation and differentiation Proteogenomic Analysis of Human Colon Cancer Reveals New Therapeutic Opportunities WAFL, a new protein involved in regulation of early endocytic transport at the intersection of actin and microtubule dynamics Beating the odds: BETs in disease A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern Regulation of Integrin β 1 recycling to lipid rafts by Rab1a to promote cell migration Comorbidities and multi-organ injuries in the treatment of COVID-19 RNA viruses promote activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome through a RIP1-RIP3-DRP1 signaling pathway Studies on membrane-associated prostaglandin E synthase-2 with reference to production of 12L-hydroxy-5,8,10-heptadecatrienoic acid (HHT) Essential 110Cys in active site of membrane-associated prostaglandin E synthase-2 Complex Pathologic Roles of RIPK1 and RIPK3: Moving Beyond Necroptosis The two faces of receptor interacting protein kinase-1 Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report -41. WHO Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Situation Report -51. WHO REEP5 (Receptor Accessory Protein 5) Acts as a Sarcoplasmic G(olf) subunit alpha; GNB1, guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(S)/G(T) subunit beta-1 GNGT1, guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(T) subunit gamma-T1 RTPs, receptor transporting proteins The authors declare no competing financial interests.