key: cord-0855101-7un5fiar authors: de Figueiredo, Camila Saggioro; Sandre, Poliana Capucho; Portugal, Liana Catarina Lima; Mázala-de-Oliveira, Thalita; da Silva Chagas, Luana; Raony, Ícaro; Ferreira, Elenn Soares; Giestal-de-Araujo, Elizabeth; dos Santos, Aline Araujo; Bomfim, Priscilla Oliveira-Silva title: COVID-19 pandemic impact on children and adolescents' mental health: Biological, environmental, and social factors date: 2020-11-11 journal: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.110171 sha: 98ba6bdd2d2877122b87ef1ef790e6c5d738453f doc_id: 855101 cord_uid: 7un5fiar Since the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was announced, we had an unprecedented change in the way we organize ourselves socially and in our daily routine. Children and adolescents were also greatly impacted by the abrupt withdrawal from school, social life and outdoor activities. Some of them also experienced domestic violence growing. The stress they are subjected to directly impacts their mental health on account of increased anxiety, changes in their diets and in school dynamics, fear or even failing to scale the problem. Our aim is to bring up a discussion under different aspects and to alert public health and government agents about the need for surveillance and care of these individuals. We hope that the damage to their mental health as a result of the side effect of this pandemic can be mitigated by adequate and timely intervention. The world has been changing at a dizzying speed since Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 , promoted a drastic and sudden change in the way we organize ourselves as social human beings. In March 2020, WHO declared that COVID-19 reached a pandemic status, putting the planet in a state of maximum alert and grew to dimensions that still cannot be measured today (WHO, 2020a) . The literature has pointed out that older individuals are more susceptible to develop COVID-19, and those with major comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension and obesity can be more affected and could potentially be at higher risk for severe illness and death (Shahid et al., 2020) . Although children apparently present a lower risk of developing the severe form of the disease as well as less hospital care and mechanical ventilation, they can develop a multisystemic inflammatory syndrome (Jones et al., 2020; Harahsheh et al., 2020; She et al., 2020) . Recently, some studies have pointed out that some children and adolescents infected with the newly discovered coronavirus developed skin lesions and a picture of Kawasaki syndrome. This unusual syndrome, initially identified in Japan (1967) , is a vasculitis caused by a hyperinflammatory state (Jones et al., 2020; Harahsheh et al., 2020; She et al., 2020) . Although youngsters appear to be less vulnerable to COVID-19, the side effects of the pandemic can be devastating. Children and adolescents may be highly exposed to biopsychosocial stressors generated by the pandemic and once population's containment measures to reduce virus spread are required, they could be potentially affected by the disruption in daily life routine as a result of social isolation and their unseasoned ability J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f to conceive and comprehend the short-and long-term consequences of this outbreak (Spinelli et al., 2020; Crescentini et al., 2020) . Commonly, although children and adolescents have experienced a drastic routine disruption due to the closure of schools and the absence of outdoor activities, they may not be completely isolated. In most cases, parents are at home. In this case, some youngsters may not necessarily experience an evident feeling of loneliness, as they may compensate for this by spending more time with their family members and also increasing time spent with social media and the internet (Guessoum et al., 2020; Keles, et al., 2020) . However, this situation also brings up some concerns. It was already observed that children with parents diagnosed with some psychiatric disturbance are more susceptible to developing psychopathologies (Maciejewski et al., 2018) . In the context of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, most parents had to reorganize their lives to deal with working at home in addition to children's management. As a result, this sudden overload has been putting parents under extra stressful conditions, potentially increasing the risk of children face emotional and behavioral problems (Crescentini et al., 2020) . This particular moment we are facing is an unprecedented global situation with numerous idiosyncratic factors. People are being affected in multifaceted ways, having their physical, psychological and emotional well-being compromised, along with social and economic problems (Esterwood and Saeed, 2020) . The heterogeneity and plurality of biopsychosocial stressors bring a multifactorial approach to the COVID-19 pandemic, which leads to unpredictable consequences on the mental health of vulnerable populations such as children and adolescents. Stress is usually approached under medical or biological aspects. It causes physiological damages or psychological disturbances to an organism and is generated by external or internal adverse stimuli (Gunnar and Quevedo, 2007) . The adequate body response to stress helps to preserve and achieve an allostasis condition (Gunnar and Quevedo, 2007) . However, uncontrolled or chronic responses to stress may have health harmful effects. There is already evidence of the multiple and negative psychological impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on children and adolescents quarantined populations (social isolation stressors) (Gunnar and Quevedo, 2007; Chen et al., 2020; Saurabh and Ranjan, 2020; Fegert et al., 2020) , turning these individuals more susceptible to develop longterm psychiatric disorders. Although it is still under speculation the extent of the damages caused by the stressors of COVID-19 pandemic, it was recently proposed that dysregulated neuroendocrine-immune interactions can be behind psychiatric manifestations observed in quarantined people (Raony et al., 2020) . Under normal acute stress stimuli, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activation leads to a release of glucocorticoids (e.g. cortisol) on the bloodstream that regulates the levels of pro-and anti-inflammatory molecules, which, in turn, also controls the secretion of these hormones by the HPA pathway, a mechanism of negative feedback that prevents an exacerbated inflammatory response (Del Rey and Besedovsky, 2017; Hänsel et al., 2010) . However, persistent and enhanced stressful events during early life (childhood and adolescence) can drive responses by the immune, endocrine and nervous systems mainly through a dysfunction of the HPA axis (Dahmen et al., 2018; Juruena et al., 2020) and alterations on inflammatory mediators levels in the brain (Brenhouse and Schwarz, 2016) , and/or systemically (Jiang et al., 2018) , predisposing these individuals to psychopathological conditions in adulthood (e.g. anxiety and depression). Moreover, the stress can be one of the possible triggers J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f for neuroinflammation, a term used to designate an imbalance or exacerbation of the immune signaling in the brain (Jiang et al., 2018) that can lead to several disorders (e.g. aggressive, psychosis, depression, and anxiety disorders) (Calcia et al., 2016; Ibi et al., 2008; Veenema, 2009 ). During infancy, early childhood or even in adolescence, the central nervous system (CNS) is in a vulnerable developmental window, in which the occurrence of any stressful challenges at the time of critical periods can trigger short-and long-term physiological (Danese et al., 2009; Gunnar and Quevedo, 2007) , cognitive and behavioral damages (Danese et al., 2009; Ibi et al., 2008; Nugent et al., 2011) . The main brain regions that respond to environmental stimuli (e.g. stress) are amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex. The response occurs via an intricate network of hormonal, immune and neurotransmitter responses, which can, in turn, change the response patterns of glial cells and monoamines metabolism, leading to cell death and/or mental health disturbances (Calcia et al., 2016; Danese et al., 2009 ). Longitudinal studies have significantly correlated the presence of psychosocial stressors such as social isolation during childhood and adolescence with high levels of C-reactive protein (an inflammatory biomarker) later in life (Danese et al., 2009; Lacey et al., 2014) . Moreover, Danese and colleagues (2009) also positively associated social isolation in childhood as a risk factor for depression in adult life (Danese et al., 2009) . Another important concern comes from the impact of fear in children and adolescents. A recent study reported a high prevalence of fear in quarantined children and adolescents during COVID-19 pandemic, a feeling that was mainly associated with financial worries or concerns regarding being exposed to COVID-19 or having infected others (Saurabh and Ranjan, 2020) . Moreover, it is not surprising that adolescence represents a stress-sensitive developmental window relative to fear regulation (Tottenham and Galván, 2016) . Indeed, there is evidence showing chronic stress have a great impact on amygdala-prefrontal cortex connectivity and activity, impairing, for instance, the extinction of fear memory (Tottenham and Galván, 2016) . These questions claim for further studies addressing the harmful fear effects on the developing brain in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The chronic stress caused by social isolation conditions in mice is also associated with an increased motivation to consume palatable foods (Sumis et al., 2016) . In this context, studies using animal models suggest that intake of caloric foods can act as "comfort food" and would be an alternative to alleviate the negative effects of stress (Pecoraro et al., 2004; Ulrich-Lai et al., 2010) . Chronic high-fat diet, induced by social isolation stress, reduces anxiety-and depression-like behaviors in animal models (Ulrich-Lai et al., 2010; Finger et al., 2011) and in humans (Tomiyama et al., 2011) . Moreover, it was rescued the memory impairment on the object recognition test as well as the changes in brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels caused by social isolation conditions in rats (Arcego et al., 2016; Cavaliere et al., 2019) . Social isolation stress can induce an increased food intake and weight gain both in animal models (Krolow et al., 2013) and in humans (Mengin et al., 2020) , and can be J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f associated with increased hypothalamic production of neuropeptide Y (Kuo et al., 2007) . Indeed, neuropeptide Y is involved with appetite control and insulin resistance in the brain (Kuo et al., 2007) . Accordingly, the relationship between a stressful environment and the consequent increase in the search for such types of food early in life may be one of the reasons for an increase in obesity among children and young people (Ogden et al., 2012) . In addition to obesity, access to both high-fat diets during development and social isolation can lead to structural synaptic changes (Cavaliere et al., 2019) , impacting cognitive processes in adult life such as learning and memory in rodents (Granholm et al., 2008; Valladolid-Acebes et al., 2011) as well as in humans (Francis and Stevenson, 2011) . Furthermore, it has been shown that a short period of social isolation during adolescence is able to induce long-term effects on dopaminergic pathways in rats (Lampert et al., 2017) . However, a high-fat diet has controversial results on the dopaminergic pathways due, in part, to different dietary lipid compositions. While administering a high-fat diet composed of saturated fatty acids leads to perturbations in mesolimbic dopaminergic signaling, a diet composed of unsaturated fatty acid does not (Barnes et al., 2020; Hryhorczuk et al., 2016) . A possible relationship between social isolation stress during childhood and access to high-fat diets may involve the activation of the HPA axis. In this sense, the leptin released by this type of diet can reduce the activation of the HPA axis (Bonnavion et al., 2015) and inhibit the hypothalamic neuropeptide Y synthesis and release (Stephens et al., 1995) triggered by stress, minimizing the effects of social isolation. However, the way, the duration and the localization in the brain of the effects of how caloric food intake acts to counteract stress effects in the brain deserve further investigation. In addition, the intake of highly caloric foods and the exposure to a social stressor can also J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f affect the composition of the intestinal microbiota (Galley et al., 2014; Deshpande et al., 2019) leading to changes in the brain, since metabolic products of the intestinal microbiota can influence brain functions (and vice versa) during development and adult life (Valles-Colomer et al., 2019) . Evidently, we must be careful when extrapolating data from animal models to human conditions, since protocols of social isolation stress with animals mismatch the circumstances produced by the COVID-19 lockdown. Yet, studies with animal models are useful when trying to understand certain molecular mechanisms behind the observed behavioral changes in humans. In addition, we want to highlight that the nutritional status during neurodevelopment is critical to children and adolescents" proper development. It is also important to adequate nutrition and to enhance the immune system in order to provide effective protection against possible diseases, including COVID-19, and to guarantee the rapid recovery from the disease. As social isolation is capable of changing our relationship with food, the importance of social ties for an adequate diet becomes more evident during this period of quarantine. Humans are inherently social and since early in development they have the ability to become apt cooperators with a strong motivation to communicate with other individuals (Tomasello, 2014; Boyd and Richerson, 2009 ). Evolutionarily, the formation of social bonds was fundamental to both human survival and to guarantee a healthy cognitive, emotional, endocrine and immune development (Ertel et al., 2008; Miyazaki et al., 2005) . In fact, staying close to significant others is essential to create and maintain social bonds in humans (Dunbar, 2010) . In normal circumstances (i.e. in the absence of J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f threats), spatial distancing is unnatural for us. This is more pronounced during threatening contexts, like this COVID-19 pandemic, where our affiliative tendencies and the desire to seek physical contact become even stronger (Mawson, 2017) . In the same vein, a recent paper showed that people can crave social cues just like they crave food (Tomova et al., 2020) . From this perspective, the adolescence period is considered a time of deep learning about the social environment when several key aspects of social cognition continue to develop, including the comprehension of other people"s emotions, intentions, and beliefs (Blakemore and Mills, 2014; Blakemore, 2008) . It is a time of psychosocial changes between childhood and adulthood, and a period of heightened sensitivity to social contexts during which adolescents spend more time with peers (Larson and Richards, 1991; Blakemore and Mills, 2014; Burnett et al., 2011; Blakemore, 2008) . In fact, for most teenagers, school is one of the most important social environments and one in which peers increasingly affect adolescents" self-concept, well-being and behavior (Gorrese and Ruggiere, 2013; O"Brien and Bierman, 1988) . Unfortunately, many adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic are unable to attend schools which culminated in limited interaction with peers, imposing a gap on their social network (Spinelli et al., 2020) that has been tentatively supplied by virtual interaction. It was shown by Crone and Konijn (2018) that the use of social media by adolescents builds not only the connection among peers, but also their brain connectivity. However, a recent study showed that school routines are important coping mechanisms specifically for young people with mental health issues (Lee, 2020) . Furthermore, it was shown that periods without school are also associated with decreased physical activity; increased screen time, irregular sleep patterns, and less appropriate diets in children and adolescents . The social touch is essential to develop cognition, emotions, attachment and relationships (Cascio et al., 2019) . In addition, it also contributes to the physiological regulation of the body"s responses to acute stressors as well as other short-term challenges. Gallance and Spence (2010) reviewed the importance of the social touch to human development under different aspects. It was discussed that, even when virtual relationships are established, they cannot cater to physical needs which are essential to improvement of interpersonal connections that contribute to the global development of the individual (Gallance and Spence, 2010). In the context of quarantine, the questions to the discussion we bring here are if this "virtual contact" will be enough to social behavior constructions and if it will change the course of brain development. Could social isolation stress and adversities that were installed during the pandemic result in a poor relational experience and affect the brains under development? What will be the effects of this long-term switch to "virtual contact" on human interactions? It is also important to highlight that the impact of COVID-19 is not uniform across adolescents, considering families with medium to high-income resources being able to provide adolescents with additional opportunities to interact with peers through technology, while other families cannot. In addition, it should be considered that adolescence is also characterized by multiple biological changes that include a cascade of hormonal and physical changes, leading to a substantial development of the brain, burst of activity dynamically strengthening and weakening connections among key brain regions in response to environmental input (Galvan, 2014) . Therefore, the developmental transition between childhood and adulthood brains circuits involves maturation in frontal cortical neural systems and in social and affective circuitry that occurs in response to social experiences (e.g. relationships and interactions that a person experiences with others, including that from J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f the same age), socioeconomic status and culture (Chrone and Dahl, 2012; Foulkes and Blackmore, 2018). However, this benefit of increased plasticity also renders vulnerability to stressors and to mental health issues. In fact, adolescence is the peak age of onset for the most common psychiatric disorder such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), anxiety, mood and schizophrenia (Kessler, 2005) , and it is also a time of high risk for substance abuse and suicidal behavior. The peak onset of mental illness during the teenage years could be explained by the surges of sex hormones and neurobiological changes that target specific brain regions as well as cell populations (Casey et al., 2005) . During development, the CNS undergoes an intense process of formation and maintenance of synaptic connections until adulthood. Environmental factors constantly act in this process, influencing the formation of individual cognitive and emotional aspects (Burggren and Mueller, 2015; Knudsen, 2004; Takesian and Hensch, 2013; Vickers, 2014) . The pandemic situation that we have plunged into showed multiples outspread on the individual's mental health. However, how will it affect adolescents' brains in adulthood, especially those key regions associated with action-emotion regulation (e.g. impulsive behavior), empathy, and decision-making skills? In pandemic times, there is a pressing need to mitigate the impact the young population is subjected to, particularly the more vulnerable ones who suffer from social inequalities in which families with low income cannot face education, remote learning and virtual contact with peers and family members. The pandemic has been widening and exposing the social inequality in every country affected by the economic shutdown, especially in underdeveloped countries. Social isolation also brought elevated levels of domestic violence, including childhood maltreatment or neglect as a result of parenthood insecurities and inabilities (Fegert et al., 2020) . Parenting during the pandemic is an additional challenge to deal with remote learning, home office working, and endless house chores (Spinelli et al., 2020) . Children at home represent high costs from feeding to internet access. Moreover, the internet often has to be shared with all family members. To those who live in a lowincome situation or a crowded house, this is even harder to manage. Adding to this scenario, children who have special needs, those who have had a previous COVID-19 diagnosis, or were already under treatment for any condition are more vulnerable (Fegert et al., 2020) . During childhood, adverse experiences such as trauma can induce long-term impacts on brain development as well as promote mental and behavioral disturbances through neurochemical and physiological imbalance related to neuroimmunoendocrine regulatory mechanisms (De Bellis and Zisk, 2014) . Copeland et al. (2018) followed children of different age groups for 22 years and pointed out that the outcome of trauma during childhood results in much more than a mental health issue and it became a public health issue. Moreover, it was shown by Copeland et al. (2018) that childhood trauma can trigger mental disorders, including addiction in adulthood. Therefore, it is necessary to look at this subject very carefully, in the way people is managing the COVID-19 pandemic stress. We need to guarantee that children and adolescents, as well as their families, receive the proper psychological help to support their mental health. If an emotional neglect already exists, this will most likely be intensified by the work overload that parents and/or caregivers are subjected to, as well as by social inequalities, J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f that may be related to the economic crash and the employment discharges around the world. The sum of the trauma effects can be devastating, and the damage might not be detected only in a few years after-pandemic. In the last few years, there has been a growing number of works demonstrating that a direct contact with nature is associated with great health benefits (McCurdy et al., 2010) . Among the suggested mechanisms by which stimuli from nature can impact on individual well-being and mental health include regulation of blood pressure, regulation of the immune system, reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines after walks in a forest (outside urbanized areas), regulation of autonomous activity (through the reduction of sympathetic activity opposed to an increase in the parasympathetic activity), and a deep feeling of relaxation and concentration (for review see Kuo, 2015) . Nature exposure can also reduce stress during early childhood in comparison to the ones that did not have much access to similar outside stimuli (Wells and Evans, 2003) . Children highly exposed to nature also present great health and physical development (development and refinement of locomotor skills, for example), improved self-control (reduces inappropriate in-class behaviors), better communication and social development (more complex language), besides proper cognitive development (multisensorial stimuli that raise curiosity and creativity) (Kemple et al., 2016) . Sunlight exposures have also positive effects on human health (Alfredsson et al., 2020) . Suitable sunlight exposure is essential for vitamin D synthesis, which is involved in several physiological functions (Föcker et al., 2017) . However, insufficient sunlight exposure along with a low status of vitamin D may be responsible for critical public health issues and neuropsychiatric disturbances such as cardiovascular diseases, J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f metabolic syndrome, hypertension, multiple sclerosis, asthma, type 1 diabetes, autism, Alzheimer"s disease, schizophrenia and depression (Alfredsson et al., 2020; Brouwer-Brolsma et al., 2013; Föcker et al., 2017; Humble et al., 2010; Itzhaky et al., 2012) . Accordingly, it was demonstrated that adults with depression exposed to low sunlight showed a decrease in interleukin-6 (IL-6) serum levels, a pro-inflammatory cytokine, when compared to adults with depression who were exposed to high sunlight (Levandowski et al., 2013) , which supports the well described benefits of proper sunlight exposition (Alfredsson et al., 2020) . Also, there was already observed that increased serum levels of IL-6 during childhood have been associated with a greater risk of developing depression and psychosis in young adulthood (Khandaker et al., 2014) . Therefore, we can comprehend the importance of appropriate sunlight exposure, mainly during childhood, regarding mental health conditions since this prolonged lockdown period may be potentially limiting youngsters to have a proper sunlight exposition. Unfortunately, because of quarantine, children are not allowed to play in outdoor areas and explore unstructured play. This means that we are switching from the "play-outside mode" to the "play-indoor mode", which includes spending more time on the screen. The negative impact of media and technology use was analyzed in children (aged 4-8), preteens (9-12), and teenagers (13-18). It seems that increasing the screen time use correlates positively with unhealthy eating, lack of physical exercise, more total illbeing as well as attention and physical problems (Rosen et al., 2014) . A meta-analysis review showed a negative correlation between the amount of screen use and language development in younger children. However, if exposed to better quality content with an educational bias, the use of screens can be beneficial for children's language in an agedependent manner (Madigan et al., 2020) . It is undeniable that we might have prejudice on their development, including on their mental health, but the results from this switch on our modi operandi will be known in years, not now. A follow up from these children will determine if we had or not an impact on brain organization and changes in social behavior as a consequence of the pandemic. In face of this pandemic scenario, children and adolescents are exposed to stressful situations such as fear of contracting the disease, frustration, boredom, information overload, family financial loss, and drastic changes in daily activity patterns, which make clear the multifaceted threats of COVID-19 (Brooks et al., 2020) . All these issues collaborate for future unpredictable damages that could impact not only the own children"s health, but also the health systems. For instance, Sprang and Silman (2013) showed a higher incidence of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in quarantined children than those who were not quarantined (Sprang and Silman, 2013) , evidencing just one aspect of how a pandemic situation may impact on a vulnerable population. The government and public health authorities need to consider the impact of this unusual situation on children and adolescents by implementing mitigating measures and making investments available to reduce the damages. Notwithstanding this, as the impact on the individual"s health is multifactorial, the launched resources and efforts to mitigate these damages must include health authorities, government, communities, organizations, schools, and family members. Some resources currently discussed in the literature address (i) making available a proper online environment for students to develop scholar activities (e.g. create suitable online platforms), (ii) providing motivational videos which can help to improve the daily lifestyle (e.g. how to have a J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f balanced diet, practice exercises at home, and regulate the sleep), (iii) providing access to adequate information (e.g. how to adopt correct hygiene practices) and (iv) providing access to psychological professional support Brooks et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2020) . Furthermore, social support is widely understood as the presence of positive relationships that create a feeling of belonging, stimulate trust, and encourage self-care (Uchino, 2004) . In this case, despite the external essential support, the internal support in the family context is fundamental. Parenting has been often described as the best resource to reduce adverse impacts on children's social-emotional and behavioral development (Perrin et al., 2016) . In these circumstances, whenever parents are able to stay close, to care, to love, to play, and to have conversations with their children, it is easier to perceive indicators of psychological issues and, then, interfere appropriately WHO, 2020b) . On the other hand, and complementarily, parents should be able to receive psychological, financial and logistic support provided by their government. Although all resources cited above seem to have great and real applicability, most of them, unfortunately, may be effective only for a portion of the children and adolescents" population. The sad and contrasting reality is that we live in a world with a broad social inequality and neglect in children's care (e.g. domestic violence [Marques et al., 2020] ). In this context, some questions are still to be properly addressed such as (i) how to deal with the reality wherein quarantined children are suffering from more domestic violence? And what will be the extent of the psychological damages in these individuals in the future? (ii) How to offer educational online support for children that live in rural or suburban areas where there is no or limited access to the internet or even technological devices? (iii) How motivational resources can work for children whose family members have lost their income source and are living in extreme poverty, and J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f (iv) how to prevent these individuals from the risk of infection when their houses stay in areas with poor sanitary conditions and are neglected by the government? All these concerns make part of a major problem of social inequality present in the current world and have been aggravated with this pandemic situation. To properly address these two faces of reality, we call attention of governments and authorities to also carefully look for this younger population that is particularly more vulnerable to develop a severe mental illness, considering their hard-living conditions. Moreover, further efforts must be launched to provide suitable care and protection for them. In this context, some strategies have been already implemented such as the development of a public documental material on how to prevent violence during the social isolation period. It has been developed by WHO in association with other organizations (WHO, 2020c). The proper financial support for families that have lost their income sources must be implemented by government policies in order to reduce a worsening of health conditions in a population that already is severely impaired by social inequalities. Previous works demonstrated the importance of quarantine and social isolation to contain the spread of the virus and the overload of health systems. However, the impact of this long-lasting social isolation on children and adolescents is still not properly addressed. Moreover, we draw attention not only to the multifaceted and heterogeneous feature of this pandemic which adds new issues and challenges to the population, but also to the fact that this COVID-19 outbreak may heighten pre-existing difficulties and problems in people lives, reaching the broad spectrum of the biopsychosocial framework. Herein, we brought elements for a more comprehensive discussion around J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f the neurobiology changes triggered by the stress caused by the different facets of COVID-19 outbreak (Fig 1) . We shed light on the effects of stress on the HPA axis and the possibility of triggering psychiatric disorders such as anxiety and depression, for example. We discussed neuroinflammation, diets, brain plasticity, social behavior and public health and support making an alert to a long-term public health issue and the need for prolonged governmental support (Fig 1) . As discussed throughout the above topics, changes in daily routine particularly harm children and adolescents , and this could, in turn, become a critical public health problem in the future. Moreover, we emphasize that youngsters can experience not only short-but also long-term consequences of COVID-19 stressors, as they present individual responses. The opening of cities and the uncontrolled reestablishment of some daily activities led to peaks of new cases, which also generates waves of expectations and frustration especially among youngsters who do not know how to deal with this. It is our obligation to emphasize the notorious urgency of psychological monitoring of quarantined children and adolescents, for an expected long period, especially for those who suffer domestic abuse, which grows in the same proportion to unemployment, financial bankruptcy and social inequalities. Moreover, we cannot forget the ones who lost their family members to COVID-19 or are separated from their parents or and is transported to the cortex of the adrenal glands, inducing the release of glucocorticoids (e.g. cortisol) into the bloodstream. In a negative feedback mechanism, cortisol, in turn, inhibits the secretion of CRH and ACTH. However, during early stages of life, where the child or adolescent are subjected to situations of long-lasting stress, this axis can have its activity dysregulated by inflammatory mediators synthesis and release (e.g. pro-inflammatory cytokines), neurotransmitters, hormones, among other molecules which can interfere with different physiological mechanisms. It includes distinct processes since intake regulation to cognition, for example. Moreover, the homeostasis disruption caused by a dysregulation of the HPA axis in response to stress induces neuroimmunoendocrine changes, which, if persistent, can induce poor health. All probable harmful effects on an individual's health triggered by this imbalance could be related to immune, endocrine, and nervous systems overload, and even a predisposition of these individuals to develop psychiatric disorders in adulthood. In the panel on the left we have gathered some of the possible short-term effects from exposure to stressors of COVID-19 pandemic at this stage of life (e.g. distress and hopelessness, irregular food intake, abuse and trauma, interpersonal and environmental restraint, sensorial deprivation and neglect) and on the right, possible long-term consequences (e.g. underdeveloped brain circuitry, obesity, substance abuse, lack of emotional processing, psychiatric disorders, suicidal thoughts). HPA: hypothalamic- Insufficient sun exposure has become a real public health problem Early life adversities or high fat diet intake reduce cognitive function and alter BDNF signaling in adult rats: Interplay of these factors changes these effects Reduced phasic dopamine release and slowed dopamine uptake occur in the nucleus accumbens after a diet high in saturated but not unsaturated fat The social brain in adolescence Is adolescence a sensitive period for sociocultural processing Antagonistic interplay between hypocretin and leptin in the lateral hypothalamus regulates stress responses Culture and the evolution of human cooperation Understanding differences between summer vs. school obesogenic behaviors of children: the structured days hypothesis Immunoadolescence: Neuroimmune development and adolescent behavior The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence Associations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D with fasting glucose, fasting insulin, dementia and depression in European elderly: the SENECA study Developmental critical windows and sensitive periods as three-dimensional constructs in time and space The social brain in adolescence: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging and behavioural studies Stress and neuroinflammation: a systematic review of the effects of stress on microglia and the implications for mental illness Social touch and human development Imaging the developing brain: what have we learned about cognitive development? High-Fat Diet Induces Neuroinflammation and Mitochondrial Impairment in Mice Cerebral Cortex and Synaptic Fraction Depression and anxiety among adolescents during COVID-19: A cross-sectional study Association of Childhood Trauma Exposure With Adult Psychiatric Disorders and Functional Outcomes Stuck Outside and Inside: An Exploratory Study on the Effects of the COVID-19 Outbreak on Italian Parents and Children"s Internalizing Symptoms Understanding adolescence as a period of socialaffective engagement and goal flexibility Media use and brain development during adolescence Effects of Early-Life Adversity on Hippocampal Structures and Associated HPA Axis Functions Adverse childhood experiences and adult risk factors for age-related disease: depression, inflammation, and clustering of metabolic risk markers The biological effects of childhood trauma Immune-Neuro-Endocrine Reflexes, Circuits, and Networks: Physiologic and Evolutionary Implications Examination of changes in youth diet and physical activity over the summer vacation period High fat diet alters gut microbiota but not spatial working memory in early middle-aged Sprague Dawley rats The social role of touch in humans and primates: behavioural function and neurobiological mechanisms Effects of social integration on preserving memory function in a nationally representative US elderly population Past Epidemics, Natural Disasters, COVID19, and Mental Health: Learning from History as we Deal with the Present and Prepare for the Future Challenges and burden of the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic for child and adolescent mental health: a narrative review to highlight clinical and research needs in the acute phase and the long return to normality High-fat diet selectively protects against the effects of chronic social stress in the mouse Vitamin D and mental health in children and adolescents Studying individual differences in human adolescent brain development Higher reported saturated fat and refined sugar intake is associated with reduced hippocampal-dependent memory and sensitivity to interoceptive signals The science of interpersonal touch: an overview Exposure to a social stressor disrupts the community structure of the colonic mucosaassociated microbiota Insights about adolescent behavior, plasticity, and policy from neuroscience research Adolescent psychiatric disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic and Lockdown Peer attachment and self-esteem: A meta-analytic review Effects of a saturated fat and high cholesterol diet on memory and hippocampal morphology in the middle-aged rat The neurobiology of stress and development Inflammation as a psychophysiological biomarker in chronic psychosocial stress Missed or delayed diagnosis of Kawasaki disease during the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic Dampened Mesolimbic Dopamine Function and Signaling by Saturated but not Monounsaturated Dietary Lipids Low serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) among psychiatric out-patients in Sweden: relations with season, age, ethnic origin and psychiatric diagnosis Low serum vitamin D concentrations in patients with schizophrenia The Impact of Systemic Inflammation on Neurodevelopment Behavioral and Emotional Disorders in Children during the COVID COVID-19 and Kawasaki Disease: Novel Virus and Novel Case The Role of Early Life Stress in HPA Axis and Anxiety A systematic review: the influence of social media on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents The power of outdoor play and play in natural environments Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication Association of serum interleukin 6 and C-reactive protein in childhood with depression and psychosis in young adult life: a population-based longitudinal study Sensitive periods in the development of the brain and behavior Sex-specific effects of isolation stress and consumption of palatable diet during the prepubertal period on metabolic parameters Neuropeptide Y acts directly in the periphery on fat tissue and mediates stressinduced obesity and metabolic syndrome How might contact with nature promote human health? Promising mechanisms and a possible central pathway Social isolation in childhood and adult inflammation: evidence from the National Child Development Study Short post-weaning social isolation induces long-term changes in the dopaminergic system and increases susceptibility to psychostimulants in female rats Daily companionship in late childhood and early adolescence: changing developmental contexts Mental health effects of school closures during COVID-19.The Lancet. Child & Adolescent Health The effect of sunlight exposure on interleukin-6 levels in depressive and nondepressive subjects Online mental health services in China during the COVID-19 outbreak Offspring of parents with mood disorders: time for more transgenerational research, screening and preventive intervention for this high-risk population Associations Between Screen Use and Child Language Skills: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Violence against women, children, and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic: overview, contributing factors, and mitigating measures Using nature and outdoor activity to improve children's health. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care Association between perceived social support and Th1 dominance Screen time for children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic Short sleep duration in middle childhood: risk factors and consequences Geneenvironment interactions: early life stress and risk for depressive and anxiety disorders Conceptions and perceived influence of peer groups: interviews with preadolescents and adolescents Trends in Obesity Prevalence Among Children and Adolescents in the United States Chronic stress promotes palatable feeding, which reduces signs of stress: feedforward and feedback effects of chronic stress Parenting as Primary Prevention Psycho-Neuroendocrine-Immune Interactions in COVID-19: Potential Impacts on Mental Health Media and technology use predicts ill-being among children, preteens and teenagers independent of the negative health impacts of exercise and eating habits Compliance and Psychological Impact of Quarantine in Children and Adolescents due to Covid-19 Pandemic COVID-19 and Older Adults: What We Know COVID-19 epidemic: Disease characteristics in children Parents' Stress and Children's Psychological Problems in Families Facing the COVID-19 Outbreak in Italy Posttraumatic stress disorder in parents and youth after health-related disasters The role of neuropeptide Y in the antiobesity action of the obese gene product Social isolation induces autophagy in the mouse mammary gland: link to increased mammary cancer risk Balancing plasticity/stability across brain development The ultra-social animal Comfort food is comforting to those most stressed: evidence of the chronic stress response network in high stress women The need to connect: acute social isolation causes neural craving responses Stress and the adolescent brain: Amygdalaprefrontal cortex circuitry and ventral striatum as developmental targets Social support and physical health: Understanding the health consequences of relationships Pleasurable behaviors reduce stress via brain reward pathways High-fat diets impair spatial learning in the radial-arm maze in mice The neuroactive potential of the human gut microbiota in quality of life and depression Early life stress, the development of aggression and neuroendocrine and neurobiological correlates: what can we learn from animal models? Front Neuroendocrinol Early life nutrition, epigenetics and programming of later life disease Mitigate the effects of home confinement on children during the COVID-19 outbreak Nearby nature: A buffer of life stress among rural children World Health Organization (WHO). (2020a) Helping children cope with stress during the 2019-nCoV outbreak Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) advice for the public: healthy parenting We are grateful to Arnaldo P. Andrade for his valuable suggestions in writing this article. We are grateful to Arnaldo P. Andrade for his valuable suggestions in writing this article. November 2 th , 2020Liana Catarina Lima Portugal November 2 th , 2020Thalita Mázala-de-Oliveira November 2 th , 2020Luana da Silva Chagas November 2 th , 2020Ícaro Raony November 2 th , 2020Elenn Soares Ferreira November 2 th , 2020Elizabeth Giestal-de-Araujo November 2 th , 2020