key: cord-0849794-inp3yujc authors: Peterson, Chris L.; Walker, Christine title: Universal health care and political economy, neoliberalism and effects of COVID‐19: A view of systems and complexity date: 2021-10-14 journal: J Eval Clin Pract DOI: 10.1111/jep.13631 sha: 437a09e020d036ae31b39a656f01577f59c270ba doc_id: 849794 cord_uid: inp3yujc Sturmberg and Martin's application of systems and complexity theory to understanding Universal Health Care (UHC) and Primary Health Care (PHC) is evaluated in the light of the influence of political economy on health systems. Furthermore, the role that neoliberal approaches to governance have had in creating increased inequities is seen as a key challenge for UHC. COVID‐19 has emphasized long standing discrepancies in health and these disadvantages require government will and cooperation together with adequate social services to redress these discrepancies in UHC. Sturmberg and Martin 1 present how a systems approach and complexity theory can inform Universal Health Care (UHC) and Primary Health Care (PHC). They do this by critically evaluating how the World Health Organization (WHO) links both UHC and PHC. We propose that the political economy refers to a socio-political and economic system that underscores UHC and affects the organization and delivery of PHC. This system can be understood as a complex set of arrangements and relationships that need to acknowledge the political dimension of healthcare. Furthermore, we propose that much can be gained by examining the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the political economy of UHC. The political economy of health is an important concept in understanding the financing, governance and activities of UHC and of PHC. 2 It can be seen as one of the important bases on which these systems of health care operate. We 3 previously argued that an understanding of political economy was crucial in realizing how UHC operates. 4 The concept political economy began in the 18th century with the writings of Adam Smith. It has different meanings but incorporates economic and political analyses of modes of activities and governance. 5 'Political economy of health has been in use for a number of decades…(It) is a perspective on health policy which attempts to understand economic, social, political, historical, and cultural factors influencing health issues and associated problems'. 3 The COVID-19 pandemic reveals the inequality inherently reproduced by neoliberal economies. Neoliberalism is a policy of maximizing freedom of markets, with little government control and spending, and low levels of taxation. 6 More generally, it is seen to result in increasing social and economic inequity. The pandemic has led to 82 million people worldwide being infected with COVID-19 by the end of 2020, and by May 2021, an estimated 3.3 million have died 7 , However, those of lower socio-economic status have been the most affected. 8 According to Bump et al., 9 morbidity and mortality is worse for migrants, black people, indigenous people and those who have been discriminated against or marginalized. Disease risk is more in precarious work and for groups such as mobile workers. 10 The consequence of COVID-19 has led to the poor and marginalized suffering disproportionately. Countries having insufficient vaccines and medicines will have least political and economic bargaining bases. These conditions during COVID-19 are ineffective for dealing with national health and prosperity. In addition, social security measures are important to maintaining people's health by giving them access to health services, food, housing and employment. 12 Countries are finding that health spending is not optional. 13 UHC has demonstrated through COVID-19 that it is essential to move from basically privately funded to compulsory public funding. The free-market approach will Hiam and Yates [16, pp. 646-647] argue that inequity in accessing safe, effective and affordable health care is one of the great inequalities. In the past "universal health reform has often been borne out of crisis… It is therefore possible that, like other crises before it, the COVID-19 pandemic could catalyse UHC reforms, should global leaders choose to harness the opportunity" Other researchers agree that for most countries, moving to UHC has come from disruption "to the status quo" mostly from moves to democracy or uneven status of the state. 17 In conclusion, we suggest that to fully understand complexity theories around UHI and PHC and to see them adequately resourced and developed so that universal access becomes a reality requires the evaluation of the limitations of neoliberal policies, especially with regard to social services. Further articulation of the context of the political economy is needed. The advent of COVID-19 has shown how such economic policies reduce people's abilities to be healthy. This has been the case before the pandemic but was ignored by governments. Unfortunately, if it is not addressed it will be the case after the pandemic. Universal health care: a matter of design or agency Impact of political economy on population health: a systematic review of reviews Universal health coverage and primary health care: the experience of patients The political economy of universal health coverage: a systematic narrative review Overview of political economy: the reach of political economy The impact of COVID-19 on global health goals Spotlight COVID-19 and inequalities. Fiscal Stud Political economy covid-19 extractive, regressive, competitive Health and safety protections for the mobile workforce in a pandemic: COVID-19, globalisation and mobilities The consequences of neoliberalism in the current pandemic United Nations) About the right to social security and human rights As the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated, universal health coverage (UHC) is a goal that the world can't afford to miss. Webnar Engage in the political economy of universal health coverage global-healthinitiative/Events-and-Networking/Webinars/Engaging-in-the-Political-Economy-of-Universal-Health-Coverage Understanding the impact of COVID-19 on vulnerable Australians: Insight from Good Shepherd Australia New Zealand. Good Shepherd Australia New Zealand Fragmented health systems in COVID-19: rectifying the misalignment between global health security and universal health care Will the COVID-19 crisis catalyse universal health reforms? Reaching universal health coverage: A political economy review of trends across 49 countries. Working Paper 570.Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Universal health coverage to counteract the economic impact of the COVID-19 infection: current practices and ethical challenges Universal health care and political economy, neoliberalism and effects of COVID-19: A view of systems and complexity The authors declare no conflict of interest. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.