key: cord-0849445-ywnisi57 authors: Martins-Filho, Paulo Ricardo; Araújo, Naiana Mota; Dantas, Débora Paraíso; Silva, Denison Santos; dos Santos, Cliomar Alves; Cipolotti, Rosana; Ferreira, Lis Campos title: Presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the CSF of Guillain-Barré Syndrome Patients Requires Validation date: 2021-08-24 journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J DOI: 10.1097/inf.0000000000003298 sha: 3b103010fe9c627be13f45c9e9cfad3394b5f764 doc_id: 849445 cord_uid: ywnisi57 nan To the Editors: W ith interest, we read the article by Araújo et al 1 about a 17-year-old female who was diagnosed with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), and subtype acute, demyelinating inflammatory polyneuropathy, 8 days after onset of a mild coronavirus disease 2019 infection. Surprisingly, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) investigations were positive for RNA of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). 1 The patient profited from IV immunoglobulins. 1 The study is appealing but raises concerns. The main limitation is that the test upon which SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in the CSF was not specified. Although a control mock CSF tested negative for the virus, there is no mentioning if the applied test was validated for CSF testing. There is also no discussion about the possibility that the test was false positive. Sensitivity and specificity of the applied real-time polymerase chain reaction were not provided. No information about the test-retest reliability was provided. There were also no repeated CSF investigations for the virus during follow-up, why it remains unknown for how long the virus could be proven in the CSF. A second limitation is that there was no discussion about the pathophysiologic implications of the test result. Because GBS is an immunologic and not an infectious disorder, it is rather unlikely that presence of the virus in the CSF had a direct pathophysiologic consequence. Anyhow, presence of SARS-CoV-2 is not uncommon. Particularly in patients experiencing meningitis or encephalitis, SARS-CoV-2 has been repeatedly found in the CSF. [2] [3] [4] In immunemediated complications of SARS-CoV-2, however, SARS-CoV-2 is usually absent in the CSF. In a study of 220 patients with SARS-CoV-2-associated GBS, collected until the end of December 2020, CSF was investigated for the virus in 56 cases but was found in none of them. 5 Absence of the virus in the CSF was explained by the assumption that the virus never enters the CSF or that it enters the CSF but remains only for a short time before invading neurons or endothelial cells. An argument for the temporary presence of the virus in the CSF is that virus RNA has been found on autopsy studies in neurons and endothelial cells of the frontal lobe. 6 There is also no discussion via which pathway the virus had entered the CSF. Speculations in the literature include retrograde migration of the virus along cranial or peripheral nerves, hematogenic spread, or intracellular transport in leukocytes via the blood-brain barrier. Missing are the results of the cerebral magnetic resonance imaging with contrast medium. Because GBS can manifest as Bickerstaff encephalitis, it is crucial to know if there was immune encephalitis of the brainstem or not. In this respect, it should be mentioned if there was involvement of cranial nerves, the respiratory muscles or the bulbar muscles. Because GBS may be complicated by autonomic involvement, we should know if the patient ever developed autonomic dysfunction. Although SARS-CoV-2-associated GBS is more prevalent in adults compared with children or adolescents, there is increasing evidence that also younger ages can be affected. In the study of 220 patients with SARS-CoV-2associated GBS, 6 patients were below age 18 years. 5 Overall, the interesting study has limitations which challenge the results and their interpretation. There is a need to address these limitations to strengthen the conclusions. was used for nucleic acid extraction and the Allplex nCoV-2019 kit (Seegene, Inc., Seoul, South Korea) for gene amplification. Moreover, appropriate positive, negative and internal controls were used to add confidence in the results. The multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay used in this case has a limit of detection of 4167 copies/ml and a sensitivity of 100 copies/ reaction. Target genes amplified within ≤40 cycle threshold were considered detected, and the patient had a positive result for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the CSF. Regarding the possibility of repeating the CSF virus investigation during follow-up, we decided not to perform invasive procedures with exclusively academic purpose, as this would not change the therapeutic approach. In addition, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was normal and the patient did not show any signs of brain involvement suggestive of Bickerstaff encephalitis, such as external ophthalmoplegia or disturbance of consciousness. Respiratory muscles were not involved nor did the patient had autonomic dysfunction. The symptoms presented by the patients were explained in the article. Finally, it is worth remembering that during the recent Zika and Chikungunya epidemics, viral RNA was also found in CSF of patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome, as well as the presence of IgM and IgG. 2 According to Parra et al, 3 arbovirusrelated GBS may be caused by direct infection or parainfectious nerve damage, due to the short time between onset of infectious and neurologic symptoms. Although direct viral invasion is a less likely pathophysiologic mechanism for a disease classically defined as immune-mediated, the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in CSF makes it impossible for us to rule out this hypothesis. To the Editors: W e would like to thank Eleftheriou et al 1 for their observation of sinus bradycardia in children treated with remdesivir (RDV) for COVID-19 and report similar findings in 3 of 4 children with severe COVID-19 who received RDV on our pediatric intensive care unit. We treated 2 boys with underlying chronic conditions (11 years with advanced neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses type 2 and 13 years with primordial dwarfism) with RDV suffering from COVID-19 pneumonia, progressive demand for oxygen and high SARS-CoV-2 RNA copy number in nasopharyngeal swaps. The first patient developed episodes of sinus bradycardia on day 3 and day 4 on RDV (heart rate dropped to 59 bpm from 90 to 100 baseline), the second on day 5 (56 bpm from >100 baselines) when catecholamines were also withdrawn. Both patients survived but suffer from residual lung damage aggravating their chronic disease. In addition, significant sinus bradycardia (38 bpm from >100 baseline) also occurred on day 5 of RDV treatment in the first of 2 girls (7 years with dystrophy, mild microcephaly and hypothyroidism and 4 years with adipositas) who developed critical COVID-19 disease. In this girl, however, severe myocarditis leading to the need for extracorporeal life support (ECLS), hemofiltration, catecholamine-dosing and multiple other drugs could also have led to bradycardia. 2 Notably, in this patient, levels of RDV on day 5 and day 6 (2531 and 1938 ng/ ml 1 h post-infusion, respectively) and its metabolite GS-441524 (trough level 239.5 and 291 ng/ml, respectively) were confirmed to be within target levels during ECLS and hemofiltration by the UHPLC-MS/MS method. 3 Sadly, both girls on ECLS finally succumbed due to fulminant COVID-19 despite multi-disciplinary intensive care. All children received 5 mg/kg RDV on the first day, followed by 2.5 mg/kg as considered to be safe and effective for compassionate use in children with severe COVID-19. 4 We agree with Eleftheriou et al that physicians should be aware of potential cardiovascular adverse effects of RDV and use continuous cardiac monitoring and therapeutic drug monitoring in selected cases when treating children, especially in those with pre-existing cardiac conditions. Notably, catecholamine treatment and withdrawal can either mask or lead to bradycardia itself. To the best of our knowledge, there are currently no other antiviral drugs (including monoclonal antibodies) to fight SARS-CoV-2 with at least some clinical experience in children and none are expected to receive marked authorization in the near future as clinical trials focus on participants 12 years Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) and the coronavirus pandemic: current knowledge and implications for public health Abdominal and testicular pain: an atypical presentation of COVID-19 Testicular pain as an unusual presentation of COVID-19: a brief review of SARS-CoV-2 and the testis Orchiepididymitis in a boy with COVID-19 Appendix testes torsion First report of SARS-CoV-2 detection in cerebrospinal fluid in a child with Guillain-Barré syndrome Infectious and immunemediated central nervous system disease in 48 COVID-19 patients A first case of meningitis/encephalitis associated with SARS-coronavirus-2 COVID-19-associated meningoencephalitis complicated with intracranial hemorrhage: a case report Guillain-Barre syndrome in 220 patients with COVID-19 Central nervous system involvement by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus -2 (SARS-CoV-2) First report of SARS-CoV-2 detection in cerebrospinal fluid in a child with Guillain-Barré syndrome Guillain-Barré syndrome during the Zika virus outbreak in Northeast Brazil: an observational cohort study Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with Zika virus infection in Colombia