key: cord-0847453-lzpdjb6a authors: Saini, Kamal S.; de las Heras, Begoña; Plummer, Ruth; Moreno, Victor; Romano, Marco; de Castro, Javier; Aftimos, Philippe; Fredriksson, Judy; Bhattacharyya, Gouri Shankar; Olivo, Martin Sebastian; Schiavon, Gaia; Punie, Kevin; Garcia-Foncillas, Jesus; Rogata, Ernesto; Pfeiffer, Richie; Orbegoso, Cecilia; Morrison, Kenneth; Curigliano, Giuseppe; Chin, Lynda; Saini, Monika Lamba; Rekdal, Øystein; Anderson, Steven; Cortes, Javier; Leone, Manuela; Dancey, Janet; Twelves, Chris; Awada, Ahmad title: Reimagining Global Oncology Clinical Trials for the Postpandemic Era: A Call to Arms date: 2020-09-08 journal: JCO Glob Oncol DOI: 10.1200/go.20.00346 sha: 07647c89b72d038b484df23b6ad9fc1b047bcf74 doc_id: 847453 cord_uid: lzpdjb6a nan The process of developing new anticancer therapeutics has been considered by some to be expensive, 1 time consuming, 2 bureaucratic, 3 and, to some extent, inefficient. 4 The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID- 19) pandemic has significantly affected clinical oncology studies 5, 6 and underlined the need to embrace and accelerate long-pending and awaited reforms to cancer clinical trial methodology. [7] [8] [9] This article highlights the need for optimal use of technology, reduced paperwork and bureaucracy, speedier trial setup, and greater patient centricity in the design and conduct of future clinical and translational cancer studies around the world. The basic technology to enable secure and reliable telephone/video contact between clinicians, study coordinators, and patients to facilitate remote medical consultation has been available for a number of years; however, its adoption has been limited for a variety of reasons, including lack of access to such technologies in some developing countries and concerns surrounding privacy, safety, financial reimbursement, and legal and regulatory issues. Changes to reimbursement rules and regulations have been recently announced to encourage the use of telemedicine during the COVID-19 lockdown. 10, 11 These and other such pandemic-era reforms should be adopted not only for the current situation but should also be considered for permanent adoption. [12] [13] [14] Electronic consent and telemedicine consultation could replace some protocol-mandated clinic visits, especially those for which medical imaging, biosample collection, or physical examination are not required. 15 Reduced exposure to the hospital environment could enhance patient safety, comfort, and quality of life while also perhaps lowering the number of protocol deviations in clinical trials and the overall burden of trial participation. 16 It may also help reduce inequalities in access to clinical trials resulting from transportation challenges because of geographic, financial, or physical issues, and would also reduce the burden on patient caregivers. Virtual formats could replace in-person investigator meetings, steering committee meetings, etc, thereby reducing physical, financial, and environmental burden while increasing speed and flexibility. Using social media as an easily accessible communication tool could also help to optimize the care of patients enrolled in cancer clinical trials. 17 Measures that can be self-reported by patients are increasingly being used in clinical practice and trials, and these data can be collected remotely as electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs). During the ongoing pandemic, patients, clinicians, and hospitals have become increasingly comfortable using telemedicine, and many stakeholders agree that the resulting improved access, lower cost, reduced risk of infection, and time saved should make telemedicine an integral part of our standard practice in cancer care and research moving forward, at least for predefined activities. 18, 19 Adopting digital pathology and radiomics platforms to enable images to be seamlessly analyzed at a remote and/or central facility could increase efficiency in cancer trials. 20, 21 Use of artificial intelligence could help efficiently match the unique clinical and molecular pathology characteristics of a given patient to relevant clinical trials within their region of the country, 22,23 thereby providing access to potentially life-enhancing trials for a broader and more diverse population. 24 Physical activity trackers, smart watches and other wearable devices, and smartphones with health applications allow for the real-time remote collection of health parameters, such as physical activity, ECG, temperature, blood glucose level, 25 oxygen saturation, 26 and ePROs. 27 Validated, secure, and approved wearable devices could autopopulate trial databases with robust longitudinal data, reducing the need for manual data entry and providing more efficient and improved data quality and integrity. 28 Use of clinical decision support algorithms to detect early signs and symptoms of concern (eg, fever and tachycardia suggestive of infection) and to alert the 29 Such algorithms can also be customized to support specific clinical trial protocols, which may help to improve protocol adherence and care consistency across investigators in decentralized sites so that clinical trials can be opened in additional community sites and be more accessible for more patients closer to their homes. Remote monitoring by contract research organization staff, other auditors, and even by regulatory inspectors could also be enabled by secure technologic solutions. 30, 31 We should acknowledge, however, that there are challenges to the increased use of such technologies in clinical trials, especially related to cybersecurity. It is also important to ensure that the increased use of technology does not have the unintended consequence of excluding individuals who are unable or unwilling to access that technology, such as the elderly and disadvantaged. Moreover, the increased use of technology may be both an opportunity and a threat to increasing clinical trial participation by people in low-and middle-income countries where access to mobile devices may be relatively good but other infrastructure less so. Eliminating unnecessary complexity and bureaucracy from clinical trials could help reduce the cost and time required to answer research questions. 32, 33 Reducing the verbosity and complexity of the informed consent form is long overdue. 34, 35 In case patients who are enrolled in ongoing studies need to have their consent reobtained, the updated informed consent forms should not repeat information already presented in the initial consent documents, and the application of eConsent technologies provides an efficient source of this revised information and an effective audit of review and signature. Each data item that is collected in clinical trials generates burden and cost (data entry, multiple levels of checks, source data verification, and query generation and resolution). Despite this, a significant proportion of the data collected during cancer trials may never be used; for example, a Canadian study found that only 18% of data elements collected during clinical trials were reported in future publications, 36 although a part of such unpublished data may still have been used effectively. Whereas the collection of research biopsies may enable useful future correlative science, their immediate utility often remains uncertain. 37 A strong scientific rationale for collecting tissue should be defined and ethical issues should be carefully considered before making them mandatory in cancer trials. 38 Alternate specimen types, such as liquid biopsies, for enrollment or monitoring purposes should be considered when and where appropriate. The process of submitting diagnostic blocks and other biosamples should be streamlined and standardized, 39 and we should aim to collect only the essential data and samples required to answer the predefined objectives of the ongoing study, allowing the option to collect more data and samples from interested patients/sites for subsequent translational research. Published and reusable standards, rather than just templates, of trial charters, biospecimen collection protocols, and toxicity management guidelines could help reduce paperwork and duplication of effort. Attempts at the standardization of trial methodology should be encouraged and adopted. 40 A greater ease of administration for ethical review across institutions, which would allow for a single ethics board to be designated lead for multiple centers within a region, country, or even continent, should become standard. Regulators, such as the US Food and Drug Administration 41 ; health systems, like the United Kingdom National Health Service 42 ; professional oncology societies, such as the European Society of Medical Oncology and the American Society of Clinical Oncology 30, 43 ; academicians; and industry should continue to make efforts to streamline clinical research and reduce the burden of paperwork. 44 It is a challenge for principal investigators to sign off and act as guarantor for electronic case record forms and multiple serious adverse event reports; it is important that investigator oversight is not diluted by collecting ever-increasing volumes of data for which they are not easily equipped to vouch and certify. Regulators and stakeholders involved with planning and executing cancer studies should carefully analyze and adopt best practices where possible from some large COVID-19 trials, like RECOVERY (EudraCT 2020-001113-21), DisCoVeRy (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04315948), and SOLIDARITY (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04330690), which were designed quickly and built to greatly reduce the bureaucratic burden on participating sites, with rapid startup, simplified requirements for recording consent, collection of only essential data, and ease and flexibility in methods of data entry, which enabled a remarkably early first readout of efficacy. 45 With numerous societal changes underway, this is also an opportunity for a step change in patient involvement in clinical trials. Much progress has been made with patient and public involvement in clinical trials, grant applications, and trial oversight groups. Still, there is scope for deeper engagement with patient and public involvement groups to set the global oncology research agenda. Such a relationship must be transparent and integral to study design and conduct and not merely superficial. Many COVID-19 trials had broad entry criteria, and there is now an opportunity similarly to broaden eligibility criteria 46, 47 and to recruit an ethnically diverse population in cancer trials. 48 The COVID-19 pandemic has given a boost to the emerging concept of the virtual or decentralized trial, which is a siteless study in which patient recruitment is done via Web-based methods that involve social media, patient portal and telemedicine applications, informed consent via remote electronic document access, review and signature, some trial activities done via video conference, physical examination done via remote visit or inhome nurse visit, laboratory specimen collection done by local clinics or in-home phlebotomist visit or patient service draw centers, data collection via digital health devices or ePROs, shipping of drugs to the patient's home, and outcomes collected by remote methods using digital tools. 49 A fully virtual trial is not feasible for most cancer studies, given the need for detailed and often delicate discussions, especially at the time of informed consent 50 ; intravenous drug administrations; medical imaging; and toxicity surveillance. However, decentralizing some elements when appropriate could make conventional trials more efficient, potentially reducing patient burden and consequential clinical trial dropout and optimizing health care resource utilization. These hybrid trials would be located on a spectrum, with interventional clinical trials at one end and pragmatic or real-world studies at the other. 51 A careful review of the number of mandatory visits to the hospital should be performed and, where possible, reduced. 8 Social media platforms should be used to share results of clinical trials in innovative and patient-centered ways, including laylanguage summaries and intuitive data visualization. The coming era of more patient-friendly clinical trials will require changes to the way cancer services are currently organized and delivered, with the aim of reducing the number of times the patient and contract research organization staff need to visit the site. Home visits by specialized nurses and phlebotomists, delivery of certain medications to patients' homes, and precise and timely communication with family physicians or local clinics to perform laboratory testing will likely improve the patient experience. It will, however, require careful coordination by the sites, which could be challenging in areas with limited capacity or resources. We must also be careful to ensure that any changes we adopt should not result in the systematic exclusion of potential patient pools based on geographic location, rural versus urban settings, access to digital technology, educational level, ethnicity, ability, or age. 52, 53 In conclusion, the pandemic has revealed certain limitations in the current models of cancer care and the traditional conservative approach to cancer research. [54] [55] [56] Consequently, the move toward patient centricity has accelerated, with increasing use of easily accessible and comprehensible technology, such as video, mobile phones, apps, telemedicine, and wearable devices. It has also created an opportune moment to reflect on past practices and fine tune the technologies, policies, and methodologies that we adopt in future cancer studies to enable us to develop better medicines for our patients in a faster and more efficient manner. Collection and assembly of data: Begoña de las Heras, Ruth Plummer, Javier de Castro, Gouri Shankar Bhattacharyya, Kevin Punie, Giuseppe Curigliano, Steven Anderson Data analysis and interpretation: Begoña de las Heras, Ruth Plummer, Victor Moreno, Philippe Aftimos, Judy Fredriksson, Gouri Shankar Bhattacharyya, Martin Sebastian Olivo, Gaia Schiavon, Kevin Punie, Jesus Garcia-Foncillas, Cecilia Orbegoso, Kenneth Morrison, Giuseppe Curigliano, Lynda Chin, Monika Lamba Saini, Steven Anderson, Javier Cortes, Manuela Leone, Janet Dancey, Chris Twelves Manuscript writing: All authors Final approval of manuscript: All authors Accountable for all aspects of the work: All authors The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs. org/go/site/misc/authors.html. Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments). Estimated research and development investment needed to bring a new medicine to market An appraisal of drug development timelines in the era of precision oncology Impact of cancer research bureaucracy on innovation, costs, and patient care Why most clinical research is not useful Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer treatment and research Association of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak with enrollment in cancer clinical trials Does the COVID-19 outbreak identify a broader need for an urgent transformation of cancer clinical trials research? Rethinking cancer clinical trials for COVID-19 and beyond Cancer research after COVID-19: Where do we go from here? Medicare telemedicine health care provider fact sheet COVID-19 Information Governance advice for staff working in health and care organisations I can't imagine going back': Medicare leader calls for expanded telehealth access after Covid-19 Implications for telehealth in a postpandemic future: Regulatory and privacy issues Teleconsent: A novel approach to obtain informed consent for research Telemedicine in cancer care A big world made small: Using social media to optimize patient care Virtually perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19 Global telemedicine implementation and integration within health systems to fight the COVID-19 pandemic: A call to action The use of digital pathology and image analysis in clinical trials Artificial intelligence and radiomics enhance the positive predictive value of digital chest tomosynthesis for lung cancer detection within SOS clinical trial Artificial intelligence tool for optimizing eligibility screening for clinical trials in a large community cancer center Woo M: An AI boost for clinical trials Conceptual framework to support clinical trial optimization and end-to-end enrollment workflow Wearable non-invasive epidermal glucose sensors: A review Clinical validation of LTMS-S: A wearable system for vital signs monitoring Guidelines for inclusion of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trial protocols: The SPIRIT-PRO extension Quality of data entry using single entry, double entry and automated forms processing: An example based on a study of patient-reported outcomes Use of wearable, mobile, and sensor technology in cancer clinical trials Early impact of COVID-19 on the conduct of oncology clinical trials and long-term opportunities for transformation: Findings from an American Society of Clinical Oncology survey Guidance on remote GCP inspections during the COVID19 pandemic Reducing bureaucracy in clinical research: A call for action What are the main inefficiencies in trial conduct: A survey of UKCRC registered clinical trials units in the UK Understanding verbosity: Funding source and the length of consent forms for cancer clinical trials Evidence-based strategies for shortening informed consent forms in clinical research Data collection in cancer clinical trials: Too much of a good thing Analysis of impact of post-treatment biopsies in phase I clinical trials Ethical framework for including research biopsies in oncology clinical trials Toward improving practices for submission of diagnostic tissue blocks for National Cancer Institute clinical trials Effective delivery of complex innovative design (CID) cancer trials: A consensus statement US Food and Drug Administration: Evaluating the Paperwork Reduction Act Part II: Are Burdens Being National Health Service: 12 actions to support and apply research in the NHS ESMO Clinical Research Observatory (ECRO): Improving the efficiency of clinical research through rationalisation of bureaucracy Cancer research in the United States: A critical review of current status and proposal for alternative models Effect of dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: Preliminary report Reevaluating eligibility criteria: Balancing patient protection and participation in oncology trials Broadening eligibility criteria to make clinical trials more representative: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Friends of Cancer Research joint research statement Challenges and opportunities using online portals to recruit diverse patients to behavioral trials Virtual clinical trials: Perspectives in dermatology Breaking bad news via telemedicine: A new challenge at times of an epidemic Evidence from pragmatic trials during routine care: Slouching toward a learning health system Barriers to scale of digital health systems for cancer care and control in last-mile settings Is the digital divide an obstacle to e-health? An analysis of the situation in Europe and in Italy How to emerge from the conservatism in clinical research methodology? Increased vulnerability of clinical research units during the COVID-19 crisis and their protection Covid-19 pandemic: An opportunity to reduce and eliminate low-value practices in oncology?