key: cord-0846379-jgmvsod5 authors: Kohler, Jillian C.; Mackey, Tim K. title: Why the COVID-19 pandemic should be a call for action to advance equitable access to medicines date: 2020-06-25 journal: BMC Med DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01661-3 sha: 5989d86de9371d523987d980dcdd4d2f964563e0 doc_id: 846379 cord_uid: jgmvsod5 nan the price, how it will be paid for, who manufactures and distributes it, and ensuring the integrity of these products is protected from fake or substandard versions need meaningful deliberation now. Hence, the international debate about access to medicines has to be accelerated given the real-world needs of millions currently afflicted by COVID-19 and countless others who will in the future. In the past, the importance of securing access to medicines for global health challenges, such as HIV/AIDS and hepatitis C virus, has been made abundantly and painfully clear [4, 5] . The basic questions of who gets access to what therapy, how, and when have been the subject of fierce debate and advocacy. Overlaying these questions is the fact that travel bans, trade-related retaliation, abuse of intellectual property (IP) rights, and other forms of protectionism have and may further limit supplies of needed therapies [6] . In fact, many countries have already banned or significantly limited export of protective equipment, medical devices, or medicines related to COVID-19 [7] . As a consequence of legitimate supply chains being blocked, the risk of falsified and substandard medicines grows [1] . Evidencing this risk, the European Medicines Agency and the World Health Organization (WHO) have issued warnings about the increase of falsified medicines and testing kits claiming to prevent, detect, treat, or cure COVID-19 [8, 9] . This includes online frauds involving the sales of suspect and unapproved products on e-commerce platforms, social media, and illegal online pharmacies [1] . Yet, the risk of falsified medicines is not limited only to products that may treat COVID-19, but extends to other drugs where shortages will persist [7] . The world is waiting with tremendous hope and urgency for therapies and vaccines to treat and/or prevent COVID-19. The strong pressure on the pharmaceutical industry may very well incentivize a company or drug regulatory agency to rush an immature product to market. We need to be circumspect that in the urgent quest for life-saving therapies, existing regulatory safeguards put in place to ensure safety and efficacy are not bypassed. These concerns are even more acute with recent retractions of studies from The New England Journal of Medicine and The Lancet involving the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine, and announcement by the WHO that drug trials would be halted due to safety concerns [10] . There is also a need to raise and manage legitimate concerns about the power and influence of pharmaceutical companies and the potential for systematic bias within the R&D process. This raises questions of whether during grave public health emergencies, decisions about the research and development and access to essential and potentially life-saving treatments should be left to laissezfaire economic principles. There is a clear conflict of interest when relying on private companies to solve public health needs. Companies, by their nature, are required to bring value to their shareholders, but this approach may be flawed at normal times and decidedly more dangerous during health crises when the provision of public goods is needed. Positively, we are seeing a shift in the speed of innovation and level of collaboration to stop this pandemic. This includes greater cooperation between governments, researchers, and with and within the life sciences industry. For example, Gilead Sciences recently announced deals with generic companies to manufacture and distribute experimental drug remdesivir via non-exclusive voluntary licenses. Less positively, nationalism, policy fragmentation, and the shutting down of borders may pose risks to the rapidity and reach of future treatments as countries turn increasingly inward [7] . Hence, now is the time to raise the urgency of ensuring equitable access to medicines to a supranational body, one focused on ensuring that there is a system in place to coordinate rational selection, procurement, access, distribution, and use across all countries before it is too late. Fortunately, the framework for this approach has already been put in place with international organizations, such as UNITAID, creating models to better ensure access to HIV, tuberculosis, and malaria medications; the Medicines Patent Pool which helps lower costs of medicines through voluntary licensing of IP; and the UN High-level Panel on Access to Medicines making a series of recommendations on how to promote and advance health technology and access. More recently, the WHO announced the launch of the COVID-19 Access Pool, an international project to voluntarily share IP, scientific data, and health technologyrelated knowledge to fight COVID-19. The UN General Assembly also adopted a resolution calling for international cooperation to ensure global access to medicines, vaccines, and medical equipment for COVID-19, and this year's World Health Assembly included a European Union-led resolution calling for "universal, timely and equitable access" to COVID-19 treatments. These past and current actions should act as a catalyst for a global call to action to improve access to COVID-19 treatment, vaccine, and other countermeasures. It should also form the foundation for bolder international action to establish a global access to medicines regime charged with ensuring that no one gets left behind and that anyone who requires essential treatment for COVID-19 or other health maladies will get it. COVID-19 and risks to the supply and quality of tests, drugs, and vaccines Access to medicines: making market forces serve the poor. who.int Access to medicines from a health system perspective Driving a decade of change: HIV/AIDS, patents and access to medicines for all Pathways to ensure universal and affordable access to hepatitis C treatment Analyzing the impact of trade and investment agreements on pharmaceutical policy: provisions, pathways and potential impacts A new front for nationalism: the global battle against a virus -The New York Times. nytimes.com. 2020 Medical Product Alert N°3/2020. who.int. 2020. Available from COVID-19: Beware of falsified medicines from unregistered websites Two elite medical journals retract coronavirus papers over data integrity questions Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations Authors' contributions JC and TKM designed the study, conducted the data analyses, wrote the manuscript, and approved the final version of the manuscript. Availability of data and materials Not applicable Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable/not required for this study Consent for publication Not applicable TKM is the Board Member for the Journal. There are no other competing interests to declare.