key: cord-0846035-ezai7bwy
authors: Paliani, Ugo; Cardona, Andrea
title: COVID-19 and hydroxychloroquine: Let the available data speak for themselves
date: 2020-07-21
journal: Eur J Intern Med
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2020.07.017
sha: ccb1f1418327e36206cca96a2f18d3bfb61d18b1
doc_id: 846035
cord_uid: ezai7bwy

nan

Dear Editor, In our recent editorial on the role of hydroxychloroquine during SARS-Cov-2 pandemics [1] , leveraging on the available scientific evidence, we emphasized the need of using extreme caution when it comes to prescribing a potentially toxic drug, especially with higher dose compared to standard drug regimen and on a large scale population.

We read with interest a comment from the group of Raoult and colleagues [2] . We wish to thank the authors as they clearly understood our goal of stressing the need of being very careful in analyzing the literature at a time when scientific conflicts of this magnitude are taking place.

Importantly, after our editorial, one of the papers we cited was retracted [3] and once more, this clearly underlines that, in the era of SARS-Cov-2 pandemics, owing to an unprecedented volume of research being conducted in such a short period of time and the large number of reports submitted to journals, high quality standards and meticulous peer-review process must be undertaken in order to convey objective and unbiased evidence [4] .

Nevertheless, the vast majority of the available current scientific evidence, suggest, at the very least, that hydroxychloroquine is not ready for clinical prime time as standard therapy in Covid-19. Tang and colleagues recently published a randomized clinical trial of patients with mainly persistent mild to moderate Covid-19 in which exposure to hydroxychloroquine led to a similar probability of virus elimination compared to the current standard of care [5] .

Therefore, taking together what studies have told so far, it is not surprising that the last update of the "Covid-19 treatment guidelines" The last recommendation follows results from a randomized clinical trial comparing high-dose chloroquine and low-dose chloroquine in patients with Covid-19; the study was discontinued early when preliminary results showed higher rates of mortality and QTc prolongation in the high-dose chloroquine group [6] .

Finally, it is important to note that hydroxychloroquine toxic effect is related to its volume of distribution and half-life. Hydroxychloroquine half-life is around 50 days (!) and has prolonged effects even after drug discontinuation (7) .

In conclusion, as we wrote in our editorial, we stay firm in believing that evidence based medicine is our strongest ally. Now more than ever, in the era of Covid-19 pandemics, where heterogeneous treatments and different drug doses not supported by the evidence can lead to confusion, discordant results, poor reproducibility, and potentially higher mortality, the whole scientific community should stay united in advocating the most meticulous scientific approach.

None.

Covid-19 and hydroxychloroquine: is the wonder drug failing?

Chloroquine and COVID-19: a western medical and scientific drift?

Retraction-hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis

Editorial evaluation and peer review during a pandemic: how journals maintain standards

Hydroxychloroquine in patients with mainly mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019: open label, randomised controlled trial

Effect of high vs low doses of chloroquine diphosphate as adjunctive therapy for patients hospitalized with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection: a randomized clinical trial

Mechanisms of action of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine: implications for rheumatology