key: cord-0842219-thou6n81 authors: Zulfic, Zlatan; Liu, Dennis; Lloyd, Cynthia; Rowan, Jacqueline; Schubert, Klaus Oliver title: Is telepsychiatry care a realistic option for community mental health services during the COVID-19 pandemic? date: 2020-06-22 journal: Aust N Z J Psychiatry DOI: 10.1177/0004867420937788 sha: 4474bf96124fb98792fbb7a6212a2272f7188eb6 doc_id: 842219 cord_uid: thou6n81 nan To the Editor People with severe mental illnesses have higher rates of smoking and medical comorbidities which are known to increase risk of serious COVID-19 illness including metabolic syndrome, chronic lung disease and cardiac disease (Firth et al., 2019) . The current COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated a significant review of practices for community mental health teams in order to manage the risk of infection to patients and staff. Our team conducted an audit of 314 community patients to examine the potential implications of a move to predominantly telephone support. We identified 118 patients (38%) as having significant medical comorbidities or advanced age (>55 years), placing them at higher risk of adverse outcomes in case of COVID-19 illness. In all, 21 (7%) did not have access to a phone, and a further 58 (18%) were deemed unreliable in responding to contact over the phone based on past clinician experience. The majority of these difficult-toreach patients had a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (83%), and 75% were considered high risk for COVID-19 complications. In addition to those who lack access to the technology required, there was a significant group of patients that require regular face-to-face reviews, including the 91 patients (29%) who are treated with depot medications and 71 (23%) taking clozapine. Prior to and during the current pandemic, our service has offered mobile phones to 17 of our current patients. Twelve (71%) declined the offer or gave the phone away. A recent study of patients in our region showed limited access and confidence in using technology among people with schizophrenia, which could be a barrier to online interventions (Wong et al., 2020) . There is also the potential for additional clinical risks when using telepsychiatry in an already high-risk population, especially for those presenting in crisis (Cowan et al., 2019) . Although the move by governments and health services to encourage increased telehealth take-up during this period is important, our data suggest that there are significant barriers for our core cohort of patients. In response to the current situation, service delivery should be carefully planned to emphasise patient education, social supports and maintaining therapeutic adherence. Clinician safety and well-being should be paramount when face-to-face contact is required. A dynamic and effective mental health system response is essential not only for the health and well-being of people with severe mental illness but also for mitigating the spread of the infection in the community. The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article. The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article. Zlatan Zulfic https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5780-3267 Klaus Oliver Schubert https://orcid. org/0000-0003-1690-0209 Barriers to use of telepsychiatry: Clinicians as gatekeepers The Lancet Psychiatry Commission: A blueprint for protecting physical health in people with mental illness Smartphone and internet access and utilization by people with schizophrenia in South Australia: Quantitative survey study