key: cord-0840810-i4h1useh authors: Petrelli, Fausto; Cherri, Sara; Ghidini, Michele; Perego, Gianluca; Ghidini, Antonio; Zaniboni, Alberto title: Tocilizumab as treatment for COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis date: 2021-05-20 journal: World J Methodol DOI: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i3.95 sha: 8ced620ec563a235f7dfc2cc8b32df98f243e3bb doc_id: 840810 cord_uid: i4h1useh BACKGROUND: The majority of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have good prognoses, but some develop a critical illness that can lead to death. Evidence shows severe acute respiratory syndrome is closely related to the induced cytokine storm. Interleukin-6 is a key player; its role in systemic inflammation is well known. AIM: To evaluate the effect of tocilizumab (TCZ), an interleukin-6 receptor antagonist, on the outcomes for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, MedRxiv, Science Direct, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 9(th) June 2020 for observational or prospective studies reporting results of hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 infection treated with TCZ. Effect sizes were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and an OR less than 1 was associated with a better outcome in those treated with TCZ. RESULTS: Overall 13476 patients (33 studies; n = 3264 received TCZ) with COVID-19 pneumonia and various degree of severity were included. Outcome was improved with TCZ. In the primary analysis (n = 19 studies reporting data), mortality was reduced in patients treated with TCZ (OR = 0.64, 95%CI: 0.47-0.87; P < 0.01). In 9 studies where risk of death with TCZ use was controlled for other variables mortality was reduced by 57% (OR = 0.43, 95%CI: 0.27-0.7; P < 0.01). Intensive care need (mechanical ventilation) was also reduced (OR = 0.36, 95%CI: 0.14-0.89; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In COVID-19-infected patients treated with TCZ, outcome may be improved compared to those not treated with TCZ. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 emerged in Wuhan, China in December 2019 and a pandemic was declared by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020. The pandemic rapidly became a major global health concern. The vast majority of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have good prognoses, but some develop a critical illness that can lead to death. The data show that approximately 20% become severe or critical and require hospitalization [1] . Evidence shows that severe deterioration following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection is closely related to the associated cytokine storm [2] . Tocilizumab (TCZ) is an immunomodulatory therapeutic, an interleukin (IL)-6 receptor antagonist approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicine Agency for treating cytokine release syndrome. One of the key cytokines described in the cytokine storm induced by COVID-19 is IL-6, and its role in systemic inflammation is well known. Following an intriguing biological rationale, several institutions have proposed using TCZ off-label to treat COVID-19 [3] . Thus far, randomized controlled trials have not been reported in the literature, but observational studies and case reports describe the compassionate use of TCZ. Results leave the efficacy of TCZ controversial. We performed a meta-analysis of the studies available to date. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed for evaluating records identified during the literature search [4] . The search included MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, the medRxiv preprint server, Science Direct, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials for articles published up to June 9, 2020 describing trials or observational series about the efficacy of TCZ in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Search terms were tocilizumab and COVID-19. The inclusion criteria were: (1) Randomized or single-arm prospective studies, observational or retrospective case series of patients with COVID-19 and treated with TCZ outside of clinical trials; (2) written in the English language; (3) reporting patient clinical characteristics; and (4) including at least 5 patients. Animal studies, case reports, editorials, commentaries, and clinical or pharmacological reviews were excluded. If multiple studies reported on the same population and met the inclusion criteria, the newest study was selected unless different endpoints or subgroup analyses were performed or updated. Two authors (Ghidini A, Petrelli F) determined article eligibility based on the abstracts. A third (Zaniboni A) independently read the articles, and agreement for trial inclusion was reached. Two authors (Petrelli F, Ghidini A) independently extracted data to a standard form constructed using Microsoft Word and compared results for agreement. Extracted data were author, publication year, number of participants treated, study design, patient group demographics and clinical characteristics (e.g., median age, sex, country, comorbidities), median follow-up, laboratory and clinical parameters (symptoms) of participants, rate of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) before and after TCZ use, associated drugs, imaging (baseline and improvements shown in imaging), number of cycles with TCZ and resulting adverse events, death rate, median hospitalization time, rate of discharge from the ICU and/or hospital, and hazard ratios for mortality or other events associated with TCZ use. Eligible studies were critically appraised by two independent reviewers at the study level for methodological and reporting bias by adapting the ROBIN-I tool[5] for assessing risk of bias in selected observational studies. By definition, single-arm or observational trials have a high risk of bias due to the absence of a control group and randomization. Otherwise, the Nottingham-Ottawa-Scale was used as a quality check for retrospective studies. The primary endpoints were mortality (%) and ventilatory improvement (defined as the proportion of participants relieved from ICU admission or from non-invasive ventilation defined at the time from initiation of the study treatment) among those treated with TCZ. The outcome data extracted for each study were analyzed using random-effects models and were reported as weighted measures of any event. Event rates reported in individual studies were aggregated into pooled rates. All other continuous variables were analyzed using descriptive statistics. We used the procedures of the comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA) software to calculate the effect size using dichotomous outcomes; and if these were not available either, we used other statistics (such as t-value or P value) to calculate the effect size. A random-effects meta-analysis of odds ratios (ORs) was used to aggregate efficacy outcomes reported across trials. A meta-analysis of adjusted ORs attained from multivariate analysis only was also provided. Heterogeneity was assessed using the χ 2 test. Statistical significance and the magnitude of I 2 were considered. When I 2 was less than 50%, low to moderate heterogeneity was assigned; otherwise, substantial heterogeneity was assigned. A significance threshold of P < 0.05 was adopted. All analyses were performed using CMA software version 2.2 (Biostat). We tested publication bias by inspecting the funnel plot on primary outcome measures and by Duval and Tweedie's trim and fill procedure yields an estimated effect size after publication bias has been taken into account (as implemented in CMA). We also conducted Egger's test of the intercept to quantify the bias captured by the funnel plot and to test whether it was significant. Thirty-three studies met inclusion criteria among 604 retrieved (Figure 1) Outcome was improved with TCZ. In the primary analysis (n = 19 studies reporting data), mortality was reduced in patients treated with TCZ (OR = 0.64, 95%CI: 0.47-0.87; P < 0.01; Figure 2 ). In 9 studies where risk of death with TCZ use was controlled for other variables mortality was reduced by 57% (OR = 0.43, 95%CI: 0.27-0.7; P < 0.01). Intensive care need (mechanical ventilation) was also reduced (OR = 0.36, 95%CI: 0.14-0.89; P = 0.02). In all cases, a random effect model was used. Egger's test indicated a significant publication bias (P = 0.01). Duvall and Tweedie's trim and fill procedure indicated 4 missing studies (see the funnel plot with imputed studies in Supplementary material). The adjusted effect size (after imputation of the missing studies) was 0.84 (95%CI: 0.63-1.14). A large part of the ongoing research into COVID-19 infection is concentrated on finding an immunomodulatory therapy to down-regulate the cytokine storm, usually combining it with antiviral agents[6]. In fact, IL-6 binds either with transmembrane IL-6 receptors or soluble IL-6 receptors, and the resulting complex can combine with the [19] , 2020 Roumier et al [29] , 2020 Ip et al [30] , 2020 80 Perrone et al [31] , 2020 Perez-Tanoira et al [32] , 2020 [34] , 2020 Garcia et al [36] , 2020 -/98.7 -83 Ayerbe et al [37] , 2020 -/- Fernandez-Cruz et al [39] , 2020 Garibaldi et al [40] , 2020 Siltuximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody acting and blocking IL-6, is being tested in the SISCO study, including patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome related to COVID-19 infection (NCT04322188). Preliminary data from 21 patients showed a reduction in the C-reactive protein levels in 16 patients, a clinical improvement in 33% and disease stabilization in 43% of cases [8] . In this pooled analysis of 31 studies including 2898 patients treated with TCZ, we found a strong trend toward improved survival with the use of TCZ (a significant reduction in acute mortality risk by 36%). Tocilizumab administration was also independently associated with a 57% reduced risk of death in multivariable analysis. Tocilizumab reduced also the risk of mechanical ventilation and ICU admission by 64%. Overall mortality rate was 22%. The limitations of these data are related to the observational nature of the studies, primarily monocentric and non-controlled. The population treated with TCZ was negatively selected for the worst clinical and inflammatory conditions. Also, due to the non-randomized design of all studies, final results might have been biased, and the added value of TCZ might not have been formally proven. However, despite a likely imbalance among clinical and laboratory baseline variables between the 2 groups, the effect of TCZ on clinical outcomes appears sustained. We finally recognize that some papers reported in the primary analysis were pre-printed in MedRxiv archive and not still finally reviewed and published in full. At this time, 45 trials are underway to explore the contribution of TCZ when added to the standard of care for COVID-19. Four are in phase 3 trials: the COVACTA study (NCT04320615), in which TCZ is compared with placebo, the NCT04361552 study in which the control arm is represented by best practices, the COV-AID study (NCT04330638), a six-arm study including anakinra and the association of anakinra + TCZ, and the RECOVERY study (NCT04381936), also a six-arm study, including hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, and low doses of steroids. Recently, the use of hydroxycloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide was associated with decreased survival and increased rate of ventricular arrhythmias in COVID-19 hospitalized patients [9] . Despite this alarming concern, article and data purity were subsequently questioned and article retracted. Similarly, results of a separate study with data attained from a different database, showed that hydroxycloroquine failed to reduce infection risk in people exposed to patients with confirmed COVID-19. Results indicated that the incidence of new illness compatible with COVID-19 did not differ significantly between those who received hydroxycloroquine and those who received placebo[10]. Therefore, new combinations of potentially active drugs need to be tested, and efficacy confirmed in these patients . In conclusion, we provide the first evidence that TCZ can improve the respiratory and clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in clinical practice, but its use merits further confirmatory trials. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is associated with a cytokine storm during acute phase. Interleukin-6 is a key player in this systemic inflammation. We evaluated the effect of tocilizumab (TCZ) on the outcomes of COVID-19 pneumonia. We performed a systematic review and pooled analysis of published literature. Mortality was reduced in patients treated with TCZ (Odds ratio = 0.64, 95%CI: 0.47-0.87; P < 0.01). We conclude that TCZ may improve outcome of COVID-19 infected patients. Current use of tocilizumab in clinical practice has to be validated further through large randomized trials. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China multicentre study on off-label use of tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19 Tocilizumab for the treatment of severe COVID-19 pneumonia with hyperinflammatory syndrome and acute respiratory failure: A single center study of 100 patients in Effective treatment of severe COVID-19 patients with tocilizumab COVID-19 Disease in a Regional Community Health System: A Case-Control Study Clinical characteristics and early outcomes in patients with COVID-19 treated with tocilizumab at a United States academic center Early outcomes of tocilizumab in adults hospitalized with severe COVID19: An initial report from the Vall dHebron COVID19 prospective cohort study Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome patients with Tocilizumab administration Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in severe COVID-19 patients: a single-centre retrospective cohort study Off-label use of tocilizumab for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in IL-6 Inhibition in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients Is Associated With Increased Secondary Infections Ackermann F; Foch COVID-19 Study Group. Tocilizumab for Severe Worsening COVID-19 Pneumonia: a Propensity Score Analysis Hydroxychloroquine and tocilizumab therapy in COVID-19 patients-An observational study TOCIVID-19 investigators, Italy. Tocilizumab for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. The single-arm TOCIVID-19 prospective trial Prevalence and risk factors for mortality related to COVID-19 in a severely affected area of Madrid Tocilizumab for treatment of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 Feasibility of tocilizumab in ICU patients with COVID-19 Ocilizumab is associated with reduction of the risk of ICU admission and mortality in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection The association between treatment with heparin and survival in patients with Covid-19 Tocilizumab challenge: A series of cytokine storm therapy experiences in hospitalized COVID-19 pneumonia patients Cristina Avendaño-Solá on behalf of the Puerta de Hierro COVID-19 Study Group Patient Trajectories Among Persons Hospitalized for COVID-19 : A Cohort Study Effects of tocilizumab on mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a multicentre cohort study Tocilizumab as a Therapeutic Agent for Critically Ill Patients Infected with SARS-CoV-2 Effect of Tocilizumab in Hospitalized Patients with Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Case-Control Cohort Study