key: cord-0837602-cz52xlfk authors: Marconi, Silvia; De Lazzari, Claudio title: In silico study of airway/lung mechanics in normal human breathing date: 2020-05-20 journal: Math Comput Simul DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2020.05.014 sha: 1bdb5fd71a5cf23462e3aacae42ba4e4d83c0c04 doc_id: 837602 cord_uid: cz52xlfk The airway/lung mechanics is usually represented with nonlinear 0-D models based on a pneumatic-electrical analogy. The aim of this work is to provide a detailed description of the human respiratory mechanics in healthy and diseased conditions. The model used for this purpose employs some known constitutive functions of the main components of the respiratory system. We give a detailed mathematical description of these functions and subsequently derive additional key ones. We are interested not only in the main output such as airflow at the mouth or alveolar pressure and volume, but also in other quantities such as resistance and pressure drop across each element of the system and even recoil and compliance of the chest wall. Pathological conditions are simulated by altering the parameters of the constitutive functions. Results show that increased upper airway resistance induces airflow reduction with concomitant narrowing of volume and pressure ranges without affecting lung compliance. Instead, increased elastic recoil leads to low volumes and decreased lung compliance. The model could be used in the study of the interaction between respiratory and cardiovascular systems in pathophysiological conditions. The human respiratory system is a complex network consisting of several components. Mathematical models aim to describe the relationship of the main variables of this system, namely flows, pressures and volumes. 0-D or lumped parameters models based on pneumatic-electrical circuit analogy remain most suitable for this purpose in view of their features where the variables in each compartment are spatially averaged as a function of time. As initial step towards the development of a complete model of the respiratory system, only the airway/lung mechanics is considered in this work. At present, our aim is to build up a tool for the description of the lung/airway dynamics and investigate its suitability to reproduce the time variation of the main variables. Once implemented in our numerical virtual patient simulator, this model can be used for study and teaching. In particular, it could be used to evaluate the effects induced by mechanical ventilatory assistance on the hemodynamic and energetic variables of the cardiovascular system. Many models are available from current literature describing lung/airway mechanics alone [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] or the combination of lung/airway mechanics and gas exchange, along with the interaction between the respiratory and the circulatory system [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] . These models are all based on the same schematization of the respiratory system and known constitutive functions of the main components such as upper airway and collapsible airway resistances, lung elastic recoil or the transmural pressure. Each of them analyses a particular breathing pattern or breathing manoeuvre, such as panting [1, 3] , Forced Vital Capacity manoeuvre [9] or Valsalva manoeuvre [11] , or focuses on particular aspects of normal breathing, such as the work of breathing [4] . In this work, we use a similar model based on the same structure and the same constitutive functions to give a comprehensive description of the normal breathing pattern and its response under different conditions. For this purpose, we have developed a pleural pressure generator able to reproduce pleural pressure waveforms of quiet breathing close to the real ones. We have selected different normal breathing patterns to analyse the response of the model to different inputs. We are interested not only in the main output such as airflow at the mouth or alveolar pressure and volume, but also in other quantities such as resistance and pressure drop across each element of the system and even recoil and compliance of the chest wall. We also give a mathematical overview of the constitutive functions of the components used in our model and we derive additional functions, which are not always addressed and graphically represented in studies based on similar models. We focus specifically on the range of the variables related to normal breathing, which ensure the stability of the solution. Some details on the computational aspects of the study are also provided. Furthermore, we have tested the behaviour of the model during parameter fluctuation to investigate its ability to reproduce the physiological response of the system to alterations following lung disease. The results of normal breathing simulations are in agreement with the clinical data published in the literature. The alteration of the parameters causes variations in the results consistent with the altered conditions of the system. 4 Current mathematical models of the airway/lung mechanics usually address the component of the respiratory system within the thoracic cavity only, i.e. the lungs and the section of the airways below the larynx. The airways divide into the upper airway, the collapsible airway and the small, or peripheral, airways. The lungs are considered as a unique alveolar region surrounded by the pleural space, containing a limited amount of fluid, which separates it from the chest wall and the diaphragm (Fig. 1) . The total lung volume (VL) is given by [4] : where VA is the volume of the alveolar region, VC is the volume of the collapsible airway and VD is the dead space volume. The flow of the air at the mouth is the same as the airflow in the upper airway (F). It is considered positive during expiration and negative during inspiration. It is the sum of the flow generated in the alveolar region and in the collapsible airway. The flow rate in these structures is given by the time derivative of the respective volumes (V̇A and V̇C). The action of the respiratory muscles and the elastic properties of the lungs generate the necessary pressure to inflate or deflate the lungs. The diaphragm is the main respiratory muscle responsible for inspiration during normal breathing: its movement toward the abdominal cavity causes the downward expansion of the thoracic cavity. Instead, expiration is a passive process: the diaphragm relaxes and the chest wall returns to its resting position due to the elasticity of the chest wall and the lungs, which tend to collapse inward. Nevertheless, during respiratory manoeuvers or exercise, the additional use of intercostal muscles can be required to further expand or contract the rib cage. The force generated by the muscles and the elastic recoil of the lungs act on the pleural space. When the force of the inspiratory muscles exceeds the lung elastic recoil, the rib cage expands. When muscles relax, the elastic recoil makes the rib cage contract. As a result, in normal breathing the pressure inside the pleural space, that is the pleural or intrathoracic pressure (Ppl), remains negative with respect to the environmental pressure (Pref), which is assumed as the reference value and set to zero. The environmental pressure equals the external pressure at the mouth (Pext) during normal breathing. This is not the case during assisted ventilation where the pressure at the mouth is driven by the ventilator [18] . This aspect is not included in this study. Thus, we set: The alveolar pressure (PA), the collapsible airway pressure (PC) and the pleural pressure (Ppl) are referred to the environmental pressure while the dynamic elastic recoil of the lung, or trans-pulmonary pressure (Pel), and the transmural pressure (Ptm) are referred to Ppl: The pleural pressure is directly related to the action of the muscles: it is the difference between the pressure across the chest wall (Pcw) and the pressure generated by the respiratory muscles (Pmus) [4] : J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f Journal Pre-proof 5 pl cw mus P P P (4) For this reason, we consider the spatially averaged pleural pressure as the driving pressure of the whole system instead of the pressure developed by the muscles: muscle pressure can be derived from pleural pressure and viceversa once the elastic recoil of the chest wall is known. Pmus is usually described with a non-realistic sinusoidal function [4, 8] whereas Ppl is a measurable quantity available from current literature. Therefore, we have aimed to reproduce realistic pleural pressure waveforms and derive Pmus from Eq. (4). The electrical circuit that represents the respiratory system consists of four resistances, two capacitors and a generator (Fig. 2) . The resistors mimic the airflow resistance of the upper airway (RU), the collapsible airway (RC), the small airways (RS) and the lung tissue (RLT). The capacitors mimic the compliances of the lung (CL) and the collapsible airway (CC). The alternating current generator reproduces the pleural pressure (Ppl) that is the pulsatile driving force of the system. The ground corresponds to the environmental reference pressure (Pref) or external pressure at the mouth (Pext) (Eq. (2)) [19, 20] . Pcw and Pmus are not included in the circuit. They would be modeled by replacing the generator of the pleural pressure with a capacitor (with pressure drop Pcw and flow V̇cw) in series with a generator of muscular pressure linked to the ground. The parameters of the constitutive functions are patient-dependent. We have used the parameters of a specific patient in [4, 9] to plot the graphs of the constitutive functions. We neglect the time dependence of the variables in the equations. The upper airway is considered as a rigid tubular structure whose volume is fixed in time and contributes to the dead space volume (VD). The resistance of the upper airway is usually modelled with a Rohrer resistor [21] : where F ranges between Fmin and Fmax with Fmin< 0