key: cord-0830498-7004350c
authors: Feijs, Karla L. H.; Forst, Alexandra H.; Verheugd, Patricia; Lüscher, Bernhard
title: Macrodomain-containing proteins: regulating new intracellular functions of mono(ADP-ribosyl)ation
date: 2013-06-05
journal: Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol
DOI: 10.1038/nrm3601
sha: 6f10e604b6ab41a7e4af79cf08e21ccdd8d59961
doc_id: 830498
cord_uid: 7004350c

ADP-ribosylation of proteins was first described in the early 1960's, and today the function and regulation of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation) is partially understood. By contrast, little is known about intracellular mono(ADP-ribosyl)ation (MARylation) by ADP-ribosyl transferase (ART) enzymes, such as ARTD10. Recent findings indicate that MARylation regulates signalling and transcription by modifying key components in these processes. Emerging evidence also suggests that specific macrodomain-containing proteins, including ARTD8, macroD1, macroD2 and C6orf130, which are distinct from those affecting PARylation, interact with MARylation on target proteins to 'read' and 'erase' this modification. Thus, studying macrodomain-containing proteins is key to understanding the function and regulation of MARylation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (doi:10.1038/nrm3601) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

These family names take into account the transferase activity of the members, rather than the poly merase activity. Additionally, these names reflect the homology of family members to certain toxins. The structural characterization of the catalytic domains of the ARTs diphtheria toxin and clostridial C2 and C3 toxins revealed that these have distinct folds. The fold in diphtheria toxin is related to the intracellular ARTs and the fold in the clostridial toxins is related to the extra cellular ARTs, hence the extension D and C, respectively, to the ART family name 5 . For ARTD enzymes, it is not entirely clear which amino acid serves as the ADP-ribose acceptor. Some studies indicate that Lys residues are the main acceptor 9-11 , whereas others have identified modified Glu and Asp residues [12] [13] [14] . Thus, the amino acid specificity of distinct ARTD enzymes is currentl y an open question.

The polymer-forming enzymes of the ARTD family, in particular ARTD1 (see TABLE 1 for a summary of alternative names), ARTD5 and ARTD6, have been reasonably well-studied 7, 15 . Poly(ADPribosyl) ation (PARylation) has been shown to influence different signalling processes, and distinct protein modules are known to bind this modification 7, 15, 16 . One such module is the macrodomain, which was originally identified in the core histone variant macroH2A 17 . Four years ago, macrodomains were shown to be able to bind PAR that has been synthesized in response to DNA damage 20, 25, 26 . More recently, the macrodomain of PAR glycohydrolase (PARG) was identified as a PAR hydrolase [21] [22] [23] , demonstrating that distinct macrodomains can both read and process PAR in addition to their ability to interact with ADP-ribose. We use the term 'reader' throughout this article to indicate proteins that recognize, but do not process, substrates that are modified with ADPribose. Furthermore, in our terminology 'writers' and 'erasers' refer to the enzymes that add and remove ADP-ribosylation, respectively.

In contrast to PARylation, MARylation by ARTD family members is less well understood, partially due to the fact that the mechanism of this PTM has only recently been characterized 8 . However, several reports now indicate that MARylation also has a role in different intracellular signalling processes. Moreover, certain macrodomains have now been identified as binding modules for this PTM and, in addition, other macrodomaincontaining proteins have been reported to remove MAR from substrate proteins. These novel findings, which are reviewed in this Opinion article, suggest that MARylation is a PTM that can be read and erased by macrodomai n-containing proteins. In light of these observations, we propose that MARylation is a reversible PTM that serves to control protein-protei n interactions or enzymatic activity, and that macrodomains are key modules that regulate MARylation. Moreover, it seems probable that additional m acrodomain-containing proteins that affect MARylation will be identified and that additional readers and erasers of MARylation that possess different structures also exist.

The modification of substrates by PAR is, compared to many other PTMs, rather unique as it results in the addition of long, negatively charged polymers of ADP-ribose. A considerable number of studies were published in recent years that describe the functional consequences of PARylation. Probably the best-known function of PAR is its role in the DNA damage response in which ARTD1 is recruited to DNA and activated by DNA damage, followed by local PAR synthesis 24 . These PAR chains then serve as a docking site for several proteins involved in DNA damag e repair and the associated chromatin remodelling factors, including APLF, ALC1, CHFR and macroH2A1.1 (25) (26) (27) . PARylation is also involved in several other processes, including transcriptional regulation, apoptosis, telomere maintenance, mitotic spindle assembly and function, as well as WNT signalling (for recent reviews, see REFS 7, 15, 16) .

In some cases, PARylation directly affects the properties of the modified protein. For example, auto-PARylation of ARTD1 results in its release from DNA 28 , and PARylation of TRF1 (telomeric repeat-binding factor 1) by ARTD5 inhibits the ability of TRF1 to bind to telomeric DNA 29 . Interestingly, in many other cases, PAR chains serve as scaffolding modules that attract interacting proteins through specific binding domains. For example, the E3-ubiquitin ligase RING finge r 146 (RNF146) binds to the PAR chains generated on axin by ARTD5 through its WWE (that is, Trp-Trp-Glu) domain 30 , and subsequently ubiquitylates axin. Thus, axin PARylation indirectly promotes its proteasomal degradation 31, 32 . As axin is an inhibitory component of the β-catenin destruction complex in the WNT signalling pathway 33 , the ART activity of ARTD5 stimulates this signal transductio n pathway.

Two further modules known to bind to PAR are the PAR-binding zinc-finger (PBZ), which is found in DNA damage response proteins such as CHFR and APLF 19 , and the PAR-binding motif (PBM). The PBM is a short peptide sequence with clusters of basic and hydrophobic amino acids, and it was the first motif that was identified to bind PAR 34, 35 . PBMs have been found in a considerable number of proteins, many of which are involved in DNA-associated processes such as DNA repair, replication and chromosome organization. Moreover, some proteins linked to mRNA metabolism and protein biosynthesis possess PBMs 35 . These PAR-binding modules have recently been reviewed and are therefor e not further discusse d here 7, 15, 16, 36 .

The fourth PAR-binding module is the macrodomain. Macrodomains are evolutionarily conserved structural modules of 130-190 amino acids that are found in proteins in many different organisms, and they are associated with several distinct activities (BOX 1) . With respect to PAR, ALC1 is recruited to sites of DNA damag e through its macrodomain, and this is dependent on the activation of PARforming ARTDs 7, 15 . Moreover, a recent study revealed that the catalytic domain of PARG, the major enzyme responsible for the catabolism of PAR, possesses a macrodomain fold [21] [22] [23] 37 . These findings demonstrate that macrodomains are intimately involved in PAR metabolism. With regards to the catabolism of PAR, it is worth noting that a second enzyme, ADP-ribosylhydrolase 3 (ARH3), can remove PARylation 38 . The structure of the catalytic domain of this protein has a distinct fold without obvious homology to macro domains 39 . PARG, and most likely also ARH3, seem to be unable to remove the protein proximal ADP-ribose unit, even though some earlier reports suggested it could. Considering that the bonds between two ADP-ribose units and between ADPribose and a protein are different, it is not too surprising that different enzymes are required for these cleavage events. Thus, the activity of PARG on a PARylated substrate results in a MARylated product 21, 40 . In contrast to PARylation, less is known about the functional relevance of MARylation, as well as the structures that read it and the enzymes that reverse this modification. The most recent findings, however, strongly indicate that macrodomains also control the functions of this PTM, that is, that macro domains function as readers and erasers of MARylation.

It has been postulated, on the basis of sequence similarities and structural predictions, that nine ARTD enzymes posse ss MARylation activity 8 (TABLE 1) . These enzymes have recognizable domains and motifs in addition to the catalytic domain, suggesting that they contribute to diverse cellular processes 41 . Indeed, very recent findings suggest that these enzymes have defined roles.

ARTD10 regulates cell signalling. ARTD10 was initially identified as an interaction partner of the transcription factor and proto-oncoprotein MYC 42 , and it was the first ARTD to be characterized as a mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase 8 . The nuclear interaction of ARTD10 with MYC was verified, although most ARTD10 seems to be present in highly dynamic cytoplasmic foci that are rich in ubiquitin 43 . ARTD10 is the only ARTD family member that possesses recognizable ubiquitin-interaction motifs. These bind to Lys63-linked polyubiquitin, which seems to be important for the abilit y of ARTD10 to repress nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) signalling 44 . Within the NF-κB signalling pathway, ARTD10 MARylates NEMO (NF-κB essential modulator), which results in reduced NEMO polyubiquitylation and thus decreased NF-κB signalling (FIG. 1a) . It is postulated that the Lys63-linked polyubiquitin chains serve as scaffolds to bring ARTD10 into close proximity to NEMO, which also interacts with the ubiquitin chains 45 . Moreover, overexpression of ARTD10 leads to apoptosis in HeLa cells dependent on its catalytic activity, and ARTD10 knockdown increases cell survival upon DNA damage caused by doxorubicin 46 . Because NF-κB signalling promotes cell survival, it is possible that ARTD10 affects apoptosis through repressing this signalling pathway. However, other explanations are also possible. Additional substrates of ARTD10 were identified in protein microarrays, includin g several kinases 47 . Glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) was investigated to verify the screen and to address the consequences of MARylation. It was found that GSK3β displays reduced kinase activity when it is modified by MAR. Overexpression of ARTD10 decreased GSK3β activity, whereas knockdown of endogenous ARTD10 enhanced GSK3β activity, which suggests that GSK3β MARylation occurs in cells 47 . MARylation of GSK3β could thus modulate the function of this kinase in downstream signalling pathways, such as WNT signalling, in which GSK3β phosphorylates β-catenin to lead to β-catenin proteasomal degradation 48 . Together, these findings indicate that ARTD10-mediate d MARylation is involved in multiple signalling processes.

Substrates of ARTD8 were also identified using protein microarrays, although they were not further characterized 47 . ARTD8 potentiates STAT6 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 6)-mediated transcription and, in accordance with this, it was named co-activator of STAT6 (CoaSt6) in earlier studies. In these studie s, ARTD8 was shown to ADP-ribosylate p100 (FIG. 1b) , but it was not determined whether p100 was MARylated or PARylated. p100 functions as a STAT6 cofactor, bridging this trans cription facto r to the RNA polymerase II (Pol II) complex 52 . A catalytically inactive ARTD8 mutant could not potentiate STAT6 activit y, which indicates that catalytic activity is essential. However, whether p100 is the relevant substrate of ARTD8 remains to be determined. Additionally, ARTD8 binds to the transcriptional repressors histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) and HDAC3 in unstimulated cells and ADP-ribosylates these deacetylases upon interleukin-4 (IL-4) stimulation. This leads to their dissociation from interleukin-4 (IL-4)responsive promoters and thus allows binding of transcriptional activators such as STAT6, p300 and possibly p100 (REF. 50 ).

Together, these findings suggest that ARTD8 targets multiple proteins to regulate gene transcription, but additional studie s are required to fully understand the relationship between individual observations. In a very recent paper, a requirement for ARTD8 in allergic airway disease was described. ARTD8 and its catalytic activity promote T cell differentiation towards a T H 2 phenotype 53 . This work suggests that ARTD8 inhibitors might be of therapeutic relevance for allergic inflammation.

In addition to the ability of ARTD8 to regulate transcription, ARTD14 has been proposed to act as a transcriptional repressor of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), in a manner dependent on its zinc-finger and catalytic domain 54 (FIG. 1c) . Although the catalytic activity of ARTD14 was confirmed to be MARylation of core histones, it is not clear through which substrates it exerts its effect on AHR activity 54 .

ARTD15 regulates the unfolded protei n response. ARTD15 has a unique transmembrane domain that induces its localization to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the nuclear envelope 55, 56 . A mass spectrometrybased search for ARTD15-interacting

The first solved macrodomain structure was for the Archeoglobus fulgidus protein Af1521 86 (see the figure, part a) (Protein Data Bank (PDB) code: 1HJZ). The subsequent solving of additional macrodomain structures revealed that this domain is highly conserved 26, 62, 64, 76, 79, 87 , wherein the macrodomain folds into a compact shape, with a central β-sheet (shown in pink) that is flanked by α-helices (shown in yellow). The diphosphate-binding loop (shown in cyan) is also conserved in all macrodomains 21 . Some macrodomains are binding modules for poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) 26 , such as the macrodomain of macroH2A1.1, whereas others interact with mono(ADP-ribosyl)ated (MARylated) proteins 79 , such as the macrodomain 3 of ARTD8. Furthermore, others have distinct catalytic activities, including the macrodomains in macroD1, macroD2 and C6orf130, all of which deacetylate O-acetyl-ADP-ribose 63, 64 and remove MAR from proteins 13, 40, 76 . The proposed signature residues for MAR hydrolysis (that is, the residues catalysing this reaction) are Gly182, Val271 and Phe272 in macroD1 and Gly100, Ile189 and Tyr190 in macroD2 (REF. 76 ). The newest addition to the macro domain-containing protein family is PAR glycohydrolase (PARG) (see the figure, part b) (PDB code: 4B1J) [21] [22] [23] 37 . PARG contains a catalytic loop (shown in orange) with the sequence GGG(X 6-8 )QEE 88 , which is indispensable for catalytic activity and is lacking in other macrodomains. The first solved PARG catalytic domain structure, the structure of PARG from Thermomonospora curvata, probably represents the minimal structure necessary for hydrolysis 21 , wherein Arg268 blocks access to the internal glycosidic bonds of PAR, explaining why it only possesses exoglycohydrolase activity. This macrodomain has an additional extension in other organisms that forms a β-hairpin, termed the Tyr clasp 22 (shown in green). These canonical PARG structures have a more extensive PAR-PARG interaction through this extension and thus have the ability to bind PAR at intermediate positions, suggesting that canonical PARG also functions as an endoglycohydrolase 22, 23, 37 . The structure of human PARG and of the protozoan Tetrahymena thermophila PARG also reveals an amino-terminal accessory domain, but the function of this domain is currently unknown. partners identified karyopherin β1 (KAPβ1), which is a nuclear transport protein.

Subsequently, KAPβ1 was found to be also a substrate of ARTD15 (REF. 56 ). The functional relevance of this ARTD15-KAPβ1 interaction and the subsequent modification of KAPβ1 remains to be characterized.

Additionally, two stress sensors in the unfolded protein response (UPR), namely PERK (protein kinase RNA-like ER kinase) and IRE1α (inositol-requiring transmembrane kinase and endonuclease 1α), were identified as interaction partners and substrates of ARTD15 (REF. 55 ), suggesting that ARTD15 functions in the UPR in the ER 57 .

A key regulator of these stress sensors is BiP (binding immunoglobulin protein; also known as GRP78). It interacts with PERK and IRE1α and thus inhibits them and, moreover, recognizes misfolded proteins. ARTD15 promotes the dissociation of BiP from PERK and IRE1α, possibly by binding to their peptide-binding pockets in the ER lumen, thereby displacing BiP. This, together with the stimulation of PERK kinase activity and both the kinase and endonuclease activities of IRE1α by MARylation, activates these ER stress sensors during the UPR (FIG. 1d) . This is underlined by the fact that, upon knockdown of ARTD15, PERK and IRE1α cannot be activated, leading to cell death when the UPR is induced 55 . How ARTD15 is regulated is unclear, however, on the basis of structural studies, it was proposed that an α-helical domain, which is packed against the transferase domain of ARTD15, might be importan t in controlling its activity 58 .

Interestingly, in most of these reports, the observed phenomena rely not only on the catalytic activity of these different ARTD enzymes, but also on additional domains within these enzymes, such as ubiquitininteraction motifs and zinc-finger domains, supporting the notion that these domains participate in substrate and pathway selection. These reports on mono-ADPribosyltransferase s highlight the important roles of MARylation in diverse cellular processes such as NF-κB signalling, gene transcription and the UPR, although the exact underlying mechanisms need to be investigated in more detail.

Although the first macrodomain was identified more than 20 years ago, the tight connection between these domains and ADP-ribosylation is only just being realized. Eleven human macrodomaincontaining proteins have now been identified (TABLE 2) . As discussed below, some of these macrodomains regulate PARylation, whereas it is emerging that others control MARylation (FIG. 2A) .

The discovery of macrodomain-containing proteins. The macrodomain, which is a globular module, was identified as a domain of the histone variant macroH2A, and at the time it was of unknown function 17 . Macrodomains are not only found in vertebrates but also in many bacteria, archaea, viruses and plants, suggesting their evolutionary conservation [59] [60] [61] . Their structural characteristics are described in more The ADP-ribosyltransferase ARTD10 mono-(ADP-ribosyl)ates (MARylates) NEMO and reduces its polyubiquitylation, which is dependent on both the ARTD10 ubiquitin-interaction motifs (UIMs) and its catalytic activity. This prevents NEMO from triggering the degradation of inhibitor of κB (IκB), which sequesters NF-κB in the cytoplasm to decrease its nuclear translocation and transcriptional activity. b | ARTD8 functions as an activator of STAT6 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 6), in a manner dependent on its catalytic activity and its macrodomains. Interleukin-4 (IL-4) stimulates the catalytic activity of ARTD8, leading to the MARylation of histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) and HDAC3 and their subsequent dissociation from the IL-4-responsive promoter. This allows STAT6 and the transcriptional cofactors p100 and p300 to bind to the promoter. p100 is also MARylated by ARTD8, and this might help bridge STAT6 to the RNA polymerase II (Pol II) complex. One function of p300 is to modify core histones to promote transcription, potentially cooperating with the activity of p100. c | ARTD14 interacts with aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) (which forms a complex with the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT)), and represses AHR-mediated transcription dependent on its catalytic domain and zinc-finger domain. Although ARTD14 was shown to MARylate core histones, it is not clear whether histones are the substrates relevant for the repressive effect of ARTD14 on AHR or whether other target proteins play a part. d | ARTD15 is located at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where it MARylates the cytosolic part of the ER stress sensors PERK (protein kinase RNA-like ER kinase) and IRE1α (inositol-requiring transmembrane kinase and endonuclease 1α), leading to an increase in their activity. In the ER lumen the carboxyl terminus of ARTD15 is indispensable for PERK and IRE1α activation, potentially because it stimulates the dissociation of the inhibitory factor BiP (binding immunoglobulin protein) from them. ARTD15 thus stimulates the unfolded protein response (UPR). A third ER stress sensor, ATF6, is not modified by ARTD15. TMD, transmembrane domain. detail in BOX 1. Later, it became clear that macrodomains can interact with PARylated proteins and serve as binding modules for free ADP-ribose, as demonstrated first for the macrodomain of the Archaeoglobus fulgidus protein Af1521 and the macrodomains of ARTD9 (REF. 62 ). Moreover, a catalytic activity has been assigned to some macrodomain-containing proteins, namely hydrolysis of O-acetyl-ADP-ribose 63,64 , which is a metabolite from the sirtuin-mediated NAD + -dependent deacetylation reaction 65 . Additionally, some macrodomains posses s phosphatase activity towards ADPribose-1ʹʹ-phosphate, which is a product of tRNA splicing 60, 66 . This phosphatase activity is widespread and found in m acrodomaincontaining proteins in viruses, bacteri a and eukaryotes 62,66-69 . However, the observed reaction velocity is ranked as low throughout these studies 67, 68 , raising the question of how physiologically relevant this activit y is 67 . In accordance, this macrodomain phosphatas e activity does not seem to be essential for the replication of human coronavirus in tissue culture 70 . Thus, the relevance of this activity remains to be investigated. Currently, the roles of macrodomain-containing proteins have been studie d most extensively for PARylation. In this case, relevant information was retrieved from the publication first defining this in PARG 21 and from REFS 16, 96. The information on the right refers to the functionalities of the macrodomains only. 'Yes' indicates that the respective activity has been shown for this macrodomain-containing protein, and 'No' indicates that this activity has been excluded experimentally. Dashes indicate that these activities have not yet been investigated. Numbers correspond to the amino acids in human proteins. Please note that for some of these proteins, multiple splice variants are known, but for simplicity only one has been depicted, with the exception of macroH2A1, for which splicing influences its PAR-binding capacity. ‡ Initial evidence has suggested that C6orf130 can also release complete PAR chains by cleaving the bond between Glu and the first ADP-ribose 13 . 

Recognition of PAR is a well-established feature for certain macrodomains. In particular, PARylation in response to DNA damage is sensed by several macro domains, which serve as recruitment modules for proteins involved in DNA repair (FIG. 2Ba) . Both the histone variant macroH2A1.1 (REF. 26) and the chromatin remodeller ALC1 are recruited in this manner and cause chromatin rearrangement and nucleosome sliding to facilitate DNA repair 20, 25, 71 . ARTD9 was identified as a risk factor in diffuse large B cell lymphoma 72 as it is over expressed in this disease, and it was shown to interact with the E3 ligase BBAP (B lymphom a-and BAL-associated protein; also known as DTX3L) 73 , although the exact function of the ARTD9-BBAP interactio n remained undefined. However, it was recently suggested that ARTD9, which possesses two macrodomains, is recruited to ARTD1-generated PAR at DNA damage sites via its macro domain 2, and that this is followed by BBAP-dependent local ubiquitylation and the subsequent recruitment of BRCA1 (breast cancer 1) and 53BP1 (p53-binding protei n 1) 74 . ARTD9 does not seem to have any catalytic activity 75 . As the macrodomain 2, but not the macrodomain 1, can localize ARTD9 to PAR chains 62, 74 , the function of macro domain 1 is unclear. Additionally, the recruitment of both macro D1 and m acroD2 to PAR synthe sized by ARTD1 at damaged sites was observed in cells, but the consequences of this remain to be investigated 26 . This finding contradicts an earlier report that suggested that only m acroD1 can efficiently bind PAR 66 

. New evidence points to a role for macrodomain-containing proteins in MAR signalling as well.

In contrast to the four binding modules that have been characterized for PAR, such modules were not identified for MARylated proteins until very recently. Clearly, macrodomains specify one motif that can read and erase PAR. It was therefore a logical step to address whether macrodomains are also involved in reading and processing MARylation (FIG. 2A) .

The first hint that macrodomain-containin g proteins also recognize MARylated proteins came from pull-down experiment in which the macrodomain of the Af1521 protein from A. fulgidus was used to selectively precipitate ADP-ribosylated proteins from cell lysates 78 . It was postulated that the identified proteins are MARylated, although it was unclear whether this was indeed the case in these experiments. Moreover, because the macro domain used was of bacterial origin and also capable of binding PARylated proteins 62 , the question remained whether endogenous human macrodomain-containing proteins exist that can bind to MARylated proteins in cells. Certain macrodomains interact with poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR), including the macrodomains of DNA repair factors (Ba). Other macrodomains, for example macrodomain 3 of ARTD8, recognize ARTD10-mediated MARylation (Bb). We propose that this will serve either to recruit other proteins or to induce further signalling through intrinsic domains, such as the ART domain in ARTD8. C | Macrodomains as erasers of ADP-ribosylation. Glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) is MARylated by ARTD10, leading to a decrease in its kinase activity. MacroD2 removes the MARylation, which reverts the inhibitory effect and increases GSK3β kinase activity (Ca). In addition to removal of MARylation, C6orf130 may also release entire PAR chains from PARylated proteins. This activity needs to be characterized in more detail (Cb). Poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) degrades PAR chains on ARTD1 but leaves the last ADP-ribose attached to the protein (Cc). This MAR moiety then potentially serves as a scaffold to recruit MAR readers to initiate further responses. Alternatively, ARTD1 MARylation serves as a substrate of MAR hydrolase s, including macroD2, which revert the protein into its native state. Relevant proteins are depicted or examples are given if the activity demonstrated is shared by several macrodomains. Of note, these activities are not mutually exclusive as several macrodomain s exhibit more than one function (summarized in TABLE 2) .

Recently, the crystal structures of the three ARTD8 macrodomains were solved, and the ADP-ribose-binding characteristics were determined 79 . Macrodomain 2 and macrodomain 3 from ARTD8 bind MARylated proteins with high-affinity, including automodified ARTD10 and MARylated proteins modified by ARTD10, such as the small GTPase RAN (FIG. 2Bb) . These interactions are specific as neither macrodomain 2 nor macro domain 3 of ARTD8 interacts with PARylated substrates. By contrast, macro domain 1 of ARTD8 does not interact with MARylated or PARylated proteins 79 . Furthermore, the macro domains of ARTD8 precipitated the ARTD10 substrate NEMO from cells co-expressing ARTD10 (REF. 44 ), indicating that these macro domains can be used as tools to confirm MARylation that is mediated by the ARTD family in cells. The ability of macrodomains to recognize MAR attached to proteins is not a general feature of m acrodomains, unlike the inter action of macro domains with free ADP-ribose. Instead, the binding capacity seems to be restricted to specific macrodomains as the macrodomain of macroH2A1.1 is unable to bind MARylated ARTD10 (REF. 79 ).

These findings raise important questions. For example, what determines s ubstrate-binding specificity? Because a single ADP-ribose fits into a macrodomain cleft it is tempting to speculate that macrodomains specifically binding to MARylated proteins, but not to PAR, also interact with part of the underlying protein, as is the case, for example, for bromodomains that interact with acetylated proteins 80 . Moreover, the backbone sequence around the MARylation site may determine the substrate specificity of macrodomains, with macrodomains perhaps even recognizing a sequence or structure that is similar to the modifying ARTD enzyme. In order to expand on these initial findings and to clarify the open questions, future research is required to investigate which features of the macro domain-containin g proteins mediate bindin g to MARylated proteins.

For a long time it was unclear which enzymes remove MAR from target protein s. PARG (which contains a macro domain fold) and the structurally unrelated glycohydrolase ARH3 both breakdown PAR chains 21, 39 , but neither can remove the final ADP-ribose moiety from the protein. Additionally, ARH3 was reported to hydrolyse O-acetyl-ADP-ribose 81 .

ARH1 removes MAR from target protein s, but is ADP-ribosyl-Arg specific 82 . It has been proposed that intra cellular ARTD enzymes modify either Glu or Lys, but not Arg, which makes it unlikely that ARH1 hydrolyses MAR transferred by mono-ADP-ribosyltransferases.

The gap in our knowledge on the reversibility of MARylation seems to be filled by the characterization of the O-acetyl-ADPribose deacetylases macroD1, macroD2 and C6orf130 63,64 as hydrolases of MARylated proteins in three recent reports 13, 40, 76 . In all three studies, ARTD10-mediated MARylation could be reversed in vitro by these three enzymes dependen t on their macrodomains. Moreover, ARTD10 MARylated histones and GSK3β were also substrates of macroD2, and the removal of MAR from GSK3β was sufficient to reactivate its kinase activity (FIG. 2Ca) . It is noteworthy that C6orf130 may also be capable of releasing complete PAR chains from PARylated proteins 13 (FIG. 2Cb) . It has been suggested that free PAR chains serve as signalling molecules, leading to cell death 83 . These hydrolases seem to be functionally relevant as overexpression of macroD2 in cells increases GSK3β activit y 40 , probably by removing the MAR that has been attached to it by ARTD10 (REF. 47) (FIG. 2Ca) . Moreover, PARylated ARTD1, when incubated with PARG, can be further de-ADP-ribosylated by macroD2, supporting the notion that PARG generates MARylated ARTD1 (REFS 13, 40, 76) (FIG. 2Cc) . Conversely, the MAR-binding macro domain 2 of ARTD8 does not display hydrolytic activity towards MARylated ARTD10 or its substrates 40 . These different functionalities imply that, despite their structural similarities, key residues are present in different macrodomains that mediate these activities. The biochemical studies suggest that macroD1 and macro D2 hydrolyse ADP-ribosylated Glu residues with ADP-ribose being linked to the γ-carboxylate of Glu through C1ʹʹ of the distal ribose, requiring an H 2 O for the nucleophile attack 40, 76 . These findings support the dissociative S N 1-type mechanism of substrate-assisted catalysis proposed for ARTD10 (REF. 8 ), a process in which the negatively charged γ-carboxylate of Glu participtates first in the destabilization of the glycosidic bond between nicotinamide and the ribose, followed by the release of nictonamide and the nucleophilic attack of the γ-carboxylate on the ribose, that is, on the oxocarbenium ion generated at C1ʹʹ during the transition state. Interestingly, the role of Glu residues as substrates for ADP-ribosylation is documented by a case study of a patient suffering from a lysosomal storage disease. It was found that glutamyl ribose 5-phosphate accumulated in the lysosomes of this patient 84, 85 , arguing for the relevance of enzymes that remove

Several macrodomains seem to be involved in malignancies. Two members of the macrodomaincontaining ADP-ribosyltransferase (ART) protein family, ARTD8 and ARTD9, are linked to cancer development and progression. ARTD9 is overexpressed in high-risk diffuse large B cell lymphomas 72 . ARTD8 promotes interleukin-4 (IL-4)-dependent B cell survival by co-regulating the expression of genes, the products of which control apoptosis 89 . The chromatin remodeller ALC1 is overexpressed in more than 50% of hepatocellular carcinomas and contributes to tumorigenicity in nude mice by downregulating tumour suppressors such as p53 (REF. 90 ). Missense mutations in or near the macrodomain of ALC1 in patients with congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tract (CAKUT) were not found in over 400 healthy subjects, suggesting a role for the macrodomain of ALC1 in kidney development and associated diseases 91 . MacroH2A isoforms suppress the progression of malignant melanoma, at least in part through the transcriptional repression of cyclin-dependent kinase 8 (CDK8) 92 . Consistent with this, macroH2A1.1 is upregulated in senescent cancer cells, and its expression correlates with a better prognosis for patients with lung cancer 93 . Finally, the analysis of a large family revealed inactivating mutations in the gene encoding C6orf130 that result in a fatal neurodegenerative phenotype 13 .

Macrodomains are abundant in viruses, such as alphaviruses, coronaviruses and hepatitis E virus [66] [67] [68] , and are part of viral non-structural proteins. A recent report on the infectiousness of Sindbis virus (SINV), which causes encephalomyelitis in mice, demonstrated that the macrodomain of the viral nsp3 protein has a role in viral replication 94 . Several viral macrodomains have an ADP-ribose-1ʹʹ-phosphate phosphatase activity 66, 67, 70 , but it is not clear whether this is their main function and how it contributes to pathogenesis. The binding of viral macrodomains to poly(APD) ribose (PAR) was observed 66, 67, 94 , and this might enable the viruses to interact with and manipulate host cell proteins, particularly those that are associated with the DNA damage response, which is typically triggered by viruses 95 . Macrodomains thus seem to be multifaceted in disease, although the exact underlying mechanisms await further characterization.

MAR from Glu residues. This is strongly supported by the identification of mutations in the gene encoding C6orf130 that are linked to a severe neurodegenerative phenotype 13 . This dramatic consequence of the lack of C6orf130 activity suggests that macroD1, macroD2 and C6orf130 have non-redundan t functions.

These initial findings reveal the existence of MAR hydrolases that oppose ARTDmediated mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase activities and establish MARylation as a reversible PTM (FIG. 2A) . Moreover, the findings that mutations in the gene encoding C6orf130 and the accumulation of glutamyl ribose 5-phosphate are associated with neurodegeneration highlights the importance of controlling MARylation 13, 84, 85 . Nevertheless, more research is needed to dissect the precise function of MAR hydrolases. For instance, it should be addressed whether these enzymes are specific for distinct substrates by recognizing the peptide backbone underlying the MARylation site, or whether they generally remove MARylation and are regulated, for example, in a spatio-temporal manner.

The emerging functions of MARylation highlight the potential key roles of this PTM (FIG. 1) . The thus far uncovered processes involving MARylation imply that this modification has a role in diverse signalling networks, including the UPR and, through its ability to influence NF-κB signalling, inflammatory processes. However, this is probably only the 'tip of the iceberg' , and more work is needed to dissect the consequences of MARylation for target proteins and their associated pathways, as well as to further characterize the enzymes responsible for adding and removing this modificatio n. The identification of macrodomains as binding modules suggests that there are mechanisms that can sense MARylation and likely respond to it through the associated proteins. Furthermore, these reports provide the first proof that endogenous intra cellular MARylation actually exists. The characterization of macrodomain-containin g proteins as hydrolases of MARylated proteins indicates that this modification is reversible, like other PTMs, and can thus form a transient signal in response to distinct stimuli (FIG. 2) . To fully apprehend the function of MARylation, better tools and reliable method s must be developed (for example, antibodies) to be able to measure MARylation in cells and to map modificatio n sites within target proteins.

Macrodomain-containing proteins also require further investigation. Currently, there is only a limited number of proteins with identified macrodomains. Because the macrodomain fold in PARG could not be deduced from sequence alignments alone, more macrodomain-containing proteins might be discovered purely based on their structure. The known macro domaincontaining proteins (TABLE 2) should be studied in more detail to determine whether they bind poly(ADP-ribose) or mono(ADPribose) and what activity they have. Moreover, it is not entirely clear why some macrodomains only bind PAR chains and others only MAR, or why some have catalytic activities whereas others do not (apart from PARG in which the catalytic loop enables PARG to breakdown PAR chains). The crucial residues for these different functions need to be investigated in more detail. Future research should thus be directed at improved understanding of the binding and catalytic mechanisms of macrodomains, to be able to determine their roles in the regulation of MARylation. One study indicates that ARTD10 and ARTD8 together modify roughly 200 proteins in vitro 47 . This is probably an underestimation, as the screen did not sample all proteins, but not all the in vitro targets may be true substrates in cells. Despite this uncertainty, assuming that each of the nine proposed mono-ADPribosyl transferases possesses 100 substrates and considering that the removal of PAR from substrates by PARG and ARH3 potentially results in MARylated substrates, it is possible that more than 1000 MARylated proteins exist. Thus, it is likely that in addition to macrodomains further domains exist that read and erase MARylation. It will be interesting to follow how this research area will develop, which substrates and pathways are sensitive to MARylation and how this PTM is interpreted and regulate d in cells.

A family of killer toxins. Exploring the mechanism of ADPribosylating toxins

Functional aspects of protein mono-ADP-ribosylation

Stealth and mimicry by deadly bacterial toxins

In silico characterization of the family of PARP-like poly(ADP-ribosyl)transferases (pARTs)

Toward a unified nomenclature for mammalian ADP-ribosyltransferases

ADP-ribose): novel functions for an old molecule

New insights into the molecular and cellular functions of poly(ADP-ribose) and PARPs

Substrate-assisted catalysis by PARP10 limits its activity to mono-ADP-ribosylation

Molecular mechanism of poly(ADPribosyl)ation by PARP1 and identification of lysine residues as ADP-ribose acceptor sites

Identification of lysines 36 and 37 of PARP-2 as targets for acetylation and auto-ADPribosylation

PARP1 ADP-ribosylates lysine residues of the core histone tails

Mapping PARP-1 auto-ADPribosylation sites by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

Deficiency of terminal ADP-ribose protein glycohydrolase TARG1/C6orf130 in neurodegenerative disease

Identification of the ADPribosylation sites in the PARP-1 automodification domain: analysis and implications

New readers and interpretations of poly(ADP-ribosyl) ation

Molecular insights into poly(ADP-ribose) recognition and processing

Structure and identification of ADPribose recognition motifs of APLF and role in the DNA damage response

ADP-ribose)-binding zinc finger motifs in DNA repair/checkpoint proteins

ADP-ribose)-dependent regulation of DNA repair by the chromatin remodeling enzyme ALC1

The structure and catalytic mechanism of a poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase

Structure of mammalian poly(ADPribose) glycohydrolase reveals a flexible tyrosine clasp as a substrate-binding element

Structure and mechanism of a canonical poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase

Role of poly(ADP-ribose) formation in DNA repair

ADP-ribosyl)ation directs recruitment and activation of an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeler

A macrodomain-containing histone rearranges chromatin upon sensing PARP1 activation

Learning how to read ADPribosylation

Double-stranded DNA binding domain of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 and molecular insight into the regulation of its activity

Tankyrase function at telomeres, spindle poles, and beyond

The WWE domain: a common interaction module in protein ubiquitination and ADP ribosylation

Ubiquitin ligase RNF146 regulates tankyrase and Axin to promote Wnt signaling

RNF146 is a poly(ADP-ribose)-directed E3 ligase that regulates axin degradation and Wnt signalling

Wnt/β-catenin signaling: components, mechanisms, and diseases

ADP-ribose) binds to specific domains in DNA damage checkpoint proteins

Proteome-wide identification of poly(ADP-ribose) binding proteins and poly(ADPribose)-associated protein complexes

Reprogramming cellular events by poly(ADP-ribose)-binding proteins

Structures of the human poly (ADPribose) glycohydrolase catalytic domain confirm catalytic mechanism and explain inhibition by ADP-HPD derivatives

Identification and characterization of a mammalian 39-kDa poly(ADPribose) glycohydrolase

The structure of human ADP-ribosylhydrolase 3 (ARH3) provides insights into the reversibility of protein ADP-ribosylation

Macrodomain-containing proteins are new mono-ADP-ribosylhydrolases

Progress in the function and regulation of ADP-ribosylation

PARP-10, a novel Myc-interacting protein with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity, inhibits transformation

Dynamic subcellular localization of the mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase ARTD10 and interaction with the ubiquitin receptor p62

Regulation of NF-κB signaling by the mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase ARTD10

Ubiquitination in signaling to and activation of IKK

Caspase-dependent cleavage of the mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase ARTD10 interferes with its pro-apoptotic function

ARTD10 substrate identification on protein microarrays: regulation of GSK3β by mono-ADP-ribosylation

GSK3: a multifaceted kinase in Wnt signaling

Selective potentiation of Stat-dependent gene expression by collaborator of Stat6 (CoaSt6), a transcriptional cofactor

PARP-14 functions as a transcriptional switch for Stat6-dependent gene activation

Collaborator of Stat6 (CoaSt6)-associated poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity modulates Stat6-dependent gene transcription

Identification of p100 as a coactivator for STAT6 that bridges STAT6 with RNA polymerase II

ADP-ribose) polymerase 14 and its enzyme activity regulates T H 2 differentiation and allergic airway disease

2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzop-dioxin poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (TiPARP, ARTD14) is a mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase and repressor of aryl hydrocarbon receptor transactivation

PARP16 is a tail-anchored endoplasmic reticulum protein required for the PERKand IRE1α-mediated unfolded protein response

PARP16/ARTD15 is a novel endoplasmic-reticulum-associated mono-ADPribosyltransferase that interacts with, and modifies karyopherin-ss1

The unfolded protein response: controlling cell fate decisions under ER stress and beyond

Crystal structure of human ADP-ribose transferase ARTD15/PARP16 reveals a novel putative regulatory domain

Comparative genomics and evolution of proteins involved in RNA metabolism

Sensing NAD metabolites through macro domains

The macro domain protein family: structure, functions, and their potential therapeutic implications

The macro domain is an ADP-ribose binding module

Identification of macrodomain proteins as novel O-acetyl-ADP-ribose deacetylases

Orphan macrodomain protein (human C6orf130) is an O-acyl-ADP-ribose deacylase: solution structure and catalytic properties

Function and metabolism of sirtuin metabolite O-acetyl-ADP-ribose

Differential activities of cellular and viral macro domain proteins in binding of ADP-ribose metabolites

Structural and functional basis for ADP-ribose and poly(ADP-ribose) binding by viral macro domains

Structural basis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus ADP-ribose-1ʹʹ-phosphate dephosphorylation by a conserved domain of nsP3

A highly specific phosphatase that acts on ADP-ribose 1ʹʹ-phosphate, a metabolite of tRNA splicing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

ADP-ribose-1"-monophosphatase: a conserved coronavirus enzyme that is dispensable for viral replication in tissue culture

PARP1 promotes nucleotide excision repair through DDB2 stabilization and recruitment of ALC1

BAL is a novel risk-related gene in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas that enhances cellular migration

The BAL-binding protein BBAP and related Deltex family members exhibit ubiquitinprotein isopeptide ligase activity

BAL1 and its partner E3 ligase, BBAP, link PARP activation, ubiquitylation and double-strand DNA repair independent of ATM, MDC1 and RNF8

B-aggressive lymphoma family proteins have unique domains that modulate transcription and exhibit poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity

A family of macrodomain proteins reverses cellular mono-ADP-ribosylation

Quantitative proteomics profiling of the poly(ADP-ribose)-related response to genotoxic stress

Combining affinity purification by ADP-ribose-binding macro domains with mass spectrometry to define the mammalian ADP-ribosyl proteome

Recognition of mono-ADPribosylated ARTD10 substrates by ARTD8 macrodomains

Histone recognition and large-scale structural analysis of the human bromodomain family

The 39-kDa poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase ARH3 hydrolyzes O-acetyl-ADP-ribose, a product of the Sir2 family of acetyl-histone deacetylases

Amino acid specific ADP-ribosylation: substrate specificity of an ADP-ribosylarginine hydrolase from turkey erythrocytes

ADP-ribose) (PAR) binding to apoptosis-inducing factor is critical for PAR polymerase-1-dependent cell death (parthanatos)

Glutamyl ribose 5-phosphate storage disease. A hereditary defect in the degradation of poly(ADP-ribosylated) proteins

Progressive neurologic deterioration and renal failure due to storage of glutamyl ribose-5-phosphate

The crystal structure of AF1521 a protein from Archaeoglobus fulgidus with homology to the non-histone domain of macroH2A

Splicing regulates NAD metabolite binding to histone macroH2A

Identification of three critical acidic residues of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase involved in catalysis: determining the PARG catalytic domain

PARP-14, a member of the B aggressive lymphoma family, transduces survival signals in primary B cells

Isolation and characterization of a novel oncogene, amplified in liver cancer 1, within a commonly amplified region at 1q21 in hepatocellular carcinoma

CHD1L: a new candidate gene for congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tract (CAKUT)

The histone variant macroH2A suppresses melanoma progression through regulation of CDK8

Histone macroH2A isoforms predict the risk of lung cancer recurrence

The nsP3 macro domain is important for Sindbis virus replication in neurons and neurovirulence in mice

Viral manipulation of DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoints

Dynamic relocation of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase isoforms during radiation-induced DNA damage

The authors thank their colleagues for insightful discussions and A. Ladurner and I. Ahel for providing manuscripts prior to publication. They apologize to researchers whose work could not be included owing to space restrictions. The work in the author's laboratory was supported by the START program of the Medical School of the Rheinisch-Westfaelische Technische Hochschule (RWTH) Aachen University and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG (LU466/15-1).

The authors declare no competing financial interests. On page 443 of this article, the incorrect references were cited at the end of the following sentence: "Four years ago, macrodomains were shown to be able to bind PAR that has been synthesized in response to DNA damage [18] [19] [20] ." The authors meant to refer to references 20, 25 and 26 at the end of this sentence. This has been corrected online. The authors apologize to the authors of references 25 and 26 for this mistake and for any confusion caused to readers.