key: cord-0830288-n3k36mtt
authors: Zhang, Hengdong; Chen, Jiana; Shan, Shuanglü; Cao, Fangbo; Chen, Guanghui; Zou, Yingbin; Huang, Min; Abou-Elwafa, Salah F.
title: Proteomic profiling reveals differentially expressed proteins associated with amylose accumulation during rice grain filling
date: 2020-10-15
journal: BMC Genomics
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-020-07105-9
sha: 670e36d5d758c858c76301c62b5cd51006fb7e13
doc_id: 830288
cord_uid: n3k36mtt

BACKGROUND: Amylose accumulation in rice grains is controlled by genetic and environmental factors. Amylose content is a determinant factor of rice quality in terms of cooking and eating. Great variations in amylose content in indica rice cultivars have been observed. The current study was to identify differentially expressed proteins in starch and sucrose metabolism and glycolysis/gluconeogenesis pathways and their relationships to amylose synthesis using two rice cultivars possess contrasting phenotypes in grain amylose content. RESULTS: Synthesis and accumulation of amylose in rice grains significantly affected the variations between rice cultivars in amylose contents. The high amylose content cultivar has three down-regulated differentially expressed proteins, i.e., LOC_Os01g62420.1, LOC_Os02g36600.1, and LOC_Os08g37380.2 in the glycolysis/gluconeogenesis pathway, which limit the glycolytic process and decrease the glucose-1-phosphate consumption. In the starch and sucrose metabolic pathway, an up-regulated protein, i.e., LOC_Os06g04200.1 and two down-regulated proteins, i.e., LOC_Os05g32710.1 and LOC_Os04g43360.1 were identified (Figure 4). Glucose-1-phosphate is one of the first substrates in starch synthesis and glycolysis that are catalyzed to form adenosine diphosphate glucose (ADPG), then the ADPG is catalyzed by granule-bound starch synthase I (GBSS I) to elongate amylose. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that decreasing the consumption of glucose-1-phosphate in the glycolytic process is essential for the formation of ADPG and UDPG, which are substrates for amylose synthesis. In theory, amylose content in rice can be regulated by controlling the fate of glucose-1-phosphate.

Besides, because of the relatively small genome size, employing proteomic profiling is an efficient and powerful approach in rice functional genomics in particular response to abiotic stresses such as high and low temperatures and salt stress [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] .

Since the accumulation of amylose in rice grains is controlled by genetic and environmental factors, great variations in amylose content in indica rice cultivars ranged between 8.0-40.71% have been reported [5] . Amylose, a pivotal starch component, is a linear molecule composed of D-glucose units linked together by α-1,4 glycosidic bonds with occasional branching at α-1,6 branch points. However, the availability of adenosine diphosphate glucose (ADPG) as the substrate of amylose can limit amylose synthesis [13] . Genes and enzymes implicated in amylose synthesis are well-known and characterized. Amylose synthesis occurs in the pathways of starch and sucrose metabolism and glycolysis/gluconeogenesis and is directly linked to starch and sucrose metabolism [14] . Amylose synthesis is governed by adenosine diphosphoglucose (ADP-glucose) pyrophosphorylase that is catalyzed by the waxy gene encoded protein granule-bound starch synthase I (GBSS I) that affects cooking and eating quality attributes of rice [13, 15, 16] . There are two functional waxy alleles, i.e., Wx a and Wx b . The Wx a allele is mainly distributed in the indica genotypes and is located to chromosome 6 [17, 18] . The enzyme GBSS underlies the accumulation of amylose in rice grains [18] . However, there has been limited research on the differentially expressed proteins related to amylose synthesis that are also implicated in the pathways of glycolysis/gluconeogenesis and starch and sucrose metabolism.

In this study, we have selected two rice cultivars exhibited contrasting amylose content levels to identify the differentially expressed proteins in the pathways of glycolysis/gluconeogenesis and starch and sucrose metabolism and to identify their relationships with amylose synthesis.

Differences in amylose accumulation between the two rice cultivars increased over time post-flowering. Within the first 9 days post-flowering, the accumulation of amylose did not differ significantly between the two cultivars. Meanwhile, from the ninth day postflowering until grain maturity, amylose accumulation was significantly increased in the cultivar LLY996 compared to the cultivar LLY268 (Fig. 1) . The data revealed that the cultivar LLY996 surpassed the cultivar LLY268 in grain-filling and amylose accumulation rates over the two growing seasons (Fig. 2) . The grain-filling and amylose accumulation processes were both well fitted by the logistic equation for both cultivars. The grain filling process exhibited highly significant determination coefficients (R 2 ) of 0.981 and 0.983, and 0987 and 0.988 for LLY996 and LLY268, in the first and second growing seasons, respectively. Likewise, the amylose accumulation process revealed significant determination coefficients (R 2 ) of 0.980 and 0.969, and 0987 and 0.984 for LLY996 and LLY268, in the first and second growing seasons, respectively (Table 1) . At maturity, amylose content was significantly higher (> 70%) in the cultivar LLY996 than the cultivar LLY268 in both growing seasons (Table 1) . Grain weight and amylose accumulation were respectively 9 and 10%, and 95 and 93% higher in the cultivar LLY996 than the cultivar LLY268 in the first and second growing seasons, respectively ( Fig. 1 ; Table 2 ). 

To dissect molecular mechanisms underlying amylose accumulation in rice grains, the iTRAQ approach coupled with LC-MS/MS was employed to analyze grains proteomics of the two rice cultivars LLY996 and LLY268 at 12 days post-flowering. Quality control filtering revealed a total of 3634 highly reproducible proteins that could be quantified in the LLY996 and LLY268 cultivars. Proteomic profiling exhibited 149 differentially expressed proteins in grains between LLY996 and LLY268 at 12 days post-flowering. The number of amino acids of those proteins ranged between 78 and 1431, and their molecular weight ranged between 8.70-152.30 kDa. Thirty-three out of those 149 differentially abundant proteins were up-regulated while the remaining 133 proteins were down-regulated (Table S1 ). Gene Ontology (GO) classified deferentially expressed proteins into 28 GO classification groups including biological process (BP), cellular compartment (CC) and molecular function (MF). Among these GO groups, six were molecular functions, eight were cellular components and 14 were biological processes (Table S2 ). The BP group comprises metabolic processes, single-organism processes and cellular processes. Proteins with differential expression levels of the CC category are mostly involved in cellular component organization or biogenesis, membrane and extracellular region. The most prevalent proteins in the MF group comprises membrane and organelle, catalytic activity and transporter activity (Fig. 3) .

The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis assigned the 149 differentially expressed proteins into 58 metabolic pathways (Table S3 ). According to the KEGG analysis, the Starch and sucrose metabolism pathway that involves the process of amylose synthesis and the Glycolysis/gluconeogenesis pathway is directly linked to starch and sucrose metabolism. There was six differentially expressed proteins involved in these two metabolic pathways, from which one is up-regulated protein and five are downregulated proteins. The up-regulated protein in addition to two of the five down-regulated proteins are involved in starch and sucrose metabolism, while the other three down-regulated proteins are involved in glycolysis/gluconeogenesis (Table 3 ).

Proteomics profiling has been approved as a powerful molecular strategy that has been widely implemented in dissecting the molecular basis of various biological processes in living organisms including plants. However, the experimental system and procedure of the employed proteomics profiling approach greatly affect the power and efficiency of proteomic profiling in dissecting the molecular mechanisms of a biological process [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] . In rice, seed development is a complex biological process that greatly affects grain yield and quality and is governed by complex regulatory networks comprising numerous transcription factors [29] .

The current study has been carried out to uncover proteins implicated in amylose accumulation during the early period of grain filling in rice. Two rice cultivars, i.e., LLY996 than in LLY268, differed greatly in amylose accumulation during grain filling and in amylose content of mature grains were employed in the identification of differentially expressed proteins that might be implicated in amylose accumulation during grain filling. The data revealed that the cultivar LLY996 surpassed the cultivar LLY268 in grain-filling and amylose accumulation rates over the two growing seasons. Besides, amylose accumulation was significantly increased from the ninth day post-flowering until grain maturity in the cultivar LLY996 compared to the cultivar LLY268. These findings are consistent with previous results where a significant increment of amylose accumulation occurred primarily at 5-15 days post-flowering [30] and the highest rate of amylose accumulation occurred at 3-12 days post-flowering [31] , indicating the suitability of grain samples collected 12 days post-flowering for the identification of proteins implicated in amylose accumulation during grain filling. Besides, the grain-filling and amylose accumulation processes were both well-fitted by the logistic equation for both cultivars, demonstrating the appropriateness of the two selected cultivars for quantitative proteomic profiling. The higher grain weight observed in the cultivar LLY996 compared to the cultivar LLY268 at maturity could be due to the higher-yielding ability of the cultivar LLY996 compared to the cultivar LLY268 (Fig. S1 ) which is due to the genetic composition of the two cultivars (Fig. 1) .

In starch and sucrose metabolism, the enzyme isoamylase (ISA, EC: 3.2.1.68) is a starch debranching enzyme that has three isoforms, i.e., ISA1, ISA2 and ISA3, two of which, i.e., ISA1 and ISA3, are strongly implicated in amylopectin synthesis. Furthermore, although the ISA2 isoform appears to be catalytically inactive, it may modulate the action or stability of ISA1 [32] . However, all three isoforms reduce granular starch, where amylose synthesis occurs within the granules [32, 33] . In our study, the differentially expressed protein LOC_Os05g32710.1 (ISA2) was down-regulated in the cultivar LLY996 and upregulated in the cultivar LLY268 (Table 3) , which is similar to a previous report of ISA as a starch debranching enzyme that has been up-regulated in a lowamylose content rice mutant [14] . The accumulation rate of amylose is positively correlated with the activity of the Granule-bound starch synthase (GBSS) enzyme [34] . A similar relationship was observed in our study where the protein associated with LOC_ Os06g04200.1 which is involved in GBSS activity has been up-regulated (3.39-fold change) in the cultivar LLY996 compared to the cultivar LLY268 (Table 3) . These findings suggest the implication of the locus LOC_Os06g04200.1 in enhancing amylose synthesis and accumulation in rice.

Several differentially abundant proteins have been identified to be implicated in the glycolysis and gluconeogenesis which involve reversed biochemical reactions of each other's pathways and most of the associated enzymes take part in reversible reactions of the pathways [14, 35] . Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (EC: 5.3.1.9) catalyzes the glucose-6-phosphate and fructose-6-phosphate and the reaction is reversible [36] . Triosephosphate isomerase (EC: 5.3.1.1) is involved in sugar metabolism and, basically, the pathway of glycolytic synthesis of ATP [37] . The aldose-1epimerase protein is the key enzyme (EC: 5.1.3.3) of carbohydrate metabolism and catalyzes the interconversion of αand β-anomers of sugar [38] . The key enzyme 6-phosphofructokinase, which is a pyruvate kinase and pyruvate phosphate dikinase catalyze irreversible reactions in glycolysis [14] , did not show differential expression between the two cultivars, suggesting that there was no Gluconeogenesis involved during grain filling and amylose accumulation. There was three differentially expressed proteins, i.e., LOC_Os01g62420.1, LOC_Os02g36600.1, and LOC_Os08g37380.2, which exhibited 0.826, 0.725, and 0.662 fold changes in the cultivar LLY996 compared to the cultivar LLY268 and are known to be implicated in triosephosphate isomerase, aldose-1-epimerase, and glucose-6-phosphate isomerase, respectively (Table 3) .

These three enzymes limit the glycolytic process and decreased the glucose-1-phosphate consumption.

Glucose-1-phosphate is a key factor that links glycolysis/gluconeogenesis and starch and sucrose metabolism (Fig. 4) . Glucose-1-phosphate is one of the first substrates in starch synthesis and glycolysis [39, 40] . It is one of the substrates that are catalyzed to form adenosine diphosphate glucose (ADPG), then the ADPG is catalyzed by GBSS to elongate amylose [13, 14] . In our study, we hypothesized that uridine diphosphate glucose (UDPG) obtained single glucose from glucose-1phosphate and then was catalyzed by GBSS to form amylose. Reportedly, UDPG could be converted into hexose phosphates and take on roles in starch synthesis [40, 41] . In the process of amylose synthesis, maltohexose acts as one form of primers in plants [16] . However, what still remains to be investigated is whether UDPG provides the hexose or, similar to the role of ADPG, provides the single glucose molecule for the primer to elongate amylose. The use ratio of glucose-1-phosphate in starch and sucrose metabolism and glycolysis also has to be further studied.

Glycolysis and gluconeogenesis involve nearly reversed biochemical reactions of each other's pathways [35] and most of the associated enzymes take part in reversible reactions of the pathways [14] . Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (EC: 5.3.1.9) catalyzes the glucose-6phosphate and fructose-6-phosphate and the reaction is reversible [36] . Triosephosphate isomerase (EC: 5.3.1.1) is involved in sugar metabolism and, basically, the pathway of glycolytic synthesis of ATP [37] . The aldose-1epimerase protein is the key enzyme (EC: 5.1.3.3) of carbohydrate metabolism and catalyzes the interconversion of αand β-anomers of sugar [38] . The key enzymes 6-phosphofructokinase, pyruvate kinase and pyruvate phosphate dikinase catalyze irreversible reactions in glycolysis [14] and we did not observe differences in the expression of any of these enzyme between the two cultivars, which suggests there was no Gluconeogenesis occurring.

Amylose accumulation results showed significant differences between different rice cultivars with different amylose contents at the 12th DPF to maturity in grains. We analyzed the differentially expressed proteins from grain sampled at the 12th DPF. The DEP LOC_ Os06g04200.1 (granule bound starch synthase I) was 3.39-fold up-regulated in the cultivar LLY996 compared to the cultivar LLY268, suggesting that this protein is crucial for the accumulation of amylose in grains. There were three enzymes, i.e., triosephosphate isomerase, aldose-1-epimerase, and glucose-6-hosphate isomerase which respectively contained three down-regulated differentially expressed proteins, i.e., LOC_ Os01g62420.1, LOC_Os02g36600.1, and LOC_ Os08g37380.2. The glycolytic process in the cultivar LLY996 was likely limited by these three enzymes and decreased glucose-1-phosphate consumption. Our results indicate that the decreasing the consumption of glucose-1-phosphate is crucial for the synthesis of ADPG and UDPG which are essential substrates for amylose synthesis and that UDPG plays an important role as one of the substrates in amylose synthesis. However, future studies implementing variable rice genotypes for validation of these results and for better understanding of the importance of this study are necessary.

Two indica rice cultivars, i.e., Luliangyou 996 (LLY996) and Lingliangyou 268 (LLY268), provided by the Hunan Rice Research Institute, Changsha, China exhibiting contrasting phenotypes in amylose content were used in the current study. The cultivar LLY996 has a high grain amylose content of up to 24.2%, while the LLY268cultivar has a low grain amylose content (12.3%). Table 4 . The experimental design of the experiments followed the in a randomized complete block design in three replications with an experimental unit (plot) size of 40 m 2 . Seeds were sown on March 29, 2016, in trays. The high-speed rice transplanter (PZ80-25, Dongfeng Iseki Agricultural Machinery Co., Ltd., Xiangyang, China) were implemented to transplant the 25-days-old seedlings into the field on April 20 at 25 cm spacing between rows and 11 cm between plants within rows. Fertilizers were applied in the ratio of 2:1:2, N: P 2 O 5 : K 2 O. A total amount of nitrogen fertilizer at 135 kg ha − 1 rate was applied in three doses, i.e., 50% as a basal fertilization dose applied a day before transplanting, 20% as tillering fertilization dose applied 7 days post-transplanting, and 30% as a headdressing dose. Phosphorus fertilization of 67.5 kg P 2 O 5 ha − 1 was applied as a basal fertilization dose, while potassium fertilization of 135 kg K 2 O ha − 1 was applied into two doses, i.e., 50% as a basal dose and 50% as a head dressing dose.

A total of 120 panicles flowered in the same day from each plot were tagged and designated as the day 1 post- Fig. 4 Differentially expressed proteins identified in pathways of "glycolysis/gluconeogenesis" and "starch and sucrose metabolism" with Luliangyou 996 (a high amylose content rice cultivar)/Lingliangyou 268 (a low amylose content rice cultivar). Only the enzymes with differentially expressed proteins and their substrates and products are shown flowering (1DPF). From the third-day post-flowering (3DPF), 10 tagged panicles were randomly sampled every 3 days until rice grains reached maturity. Half of the collected samples were oven-dried at 70°C to a constant dry-weight and their seeds were removed and hulled by hand for grain amylose content determination. Amylose content was determined using iodine-blue colorimetry. The other half of the tagged panicle samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and kept at − 80°C for total protein extraction using the acetone procedure [42] .

For proteomics profiling, grains sampled from plants at 12 DPF were used. Fractionation and identification of tryptic peptides were performed using the iTRAQ (isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation) approach coupled with LC-MS/MS (liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/ mass spectrometry). In brief, for fractionation of tryptic peptides, the Agilent 300Extend C18 column in the high pH reverse-phase HPLC was used. Fractionated peptides were then grouped into 18 fractions and vacuumcentrifuged till dry. The tryptic peptides were then dissolved in 0.1% formic acid and loaded onto a reversedphase analytical column (15-cm length, 75 μm i.d.). The Q ExactiveTM Plus (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was employed in tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). The m/z scan range was at 350 to 1800 for a full scan, and the Orbitrap was then implemented to identify the intact peptides at a resolution of 70,000. Peptides MS/MS was carried out using the NCE setting as 28, the Orbitrap was employed to identify the fragments at a resolution of 17,500. Automatic gain control (AGC) was set to 5E4, and the fixed first mass was set to 100 m/z. The Maxquant search engine (v.1.5.2.8) was employed in processing the resulting MS/MS data.

The raw mass data were processed for the peptide data analysis using Proteome Discoverer 1.4 (ver.1.4.0.288, Thermo Fisher Scientific) with a false discovery rate (FDR) < 1% and expected cutoff or ion score < 0.05 (with 95% confidence) in the search through the Rice MSU database (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/). The fold change (FC) of DEPs in rice grains was calculated as the ratio of protein abundances of LLY996/LLY268. The value of FC was used to indicate whether a protein was significantly (p<0.05) up-(FC>1.20) or down-regulated (FC< 0.833). Gene Ontology (GO) (http://www.geneontology. org,) proteome annotation was performed on the differentially abundant proteins to identify their molecular functions. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database (http://www.kegg.jp/kegg/ pathway.html/) was employed to determine the interactions among these proteins in terms of the biological pathways.

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and least significant difference (LSD) in the Statistix 8.0 software (Tallahassee, FL, USA) were employed to analyze amylose content and accumulation and grain weight. The SigmaPlot 14 Software (Systat Software, San Jose, CA, USA) was implemented to perform linear regression coefficients (R) of measured traits.

All experiments reported in the current study were financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant number 2016YFD0300509). The funding bodies played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials All data are included within the manuscript and its supplementary material. 

Amino acid content in rice grains is affected by high temperature during the early grain-filling period

Evaluation of late-season short-and long-duration Rice cultivars for potential yield under mechanical transplanting conditions

Rational design of high-yield and superior-quality rice

Waxy gene haplotypes: associations with apparent amylose content and the effect by the environment in an international rice germplasm collection

Genetic analysis of developmental behavior for amylose content in filling process of rice

Proteomic analysis of proteins related to rice grain chalkiness using iTRAQ and a novel comparison system based on a notched-belly mutant with white-belly

Comparative proteomic analysis of indica and japonica rice varieties

Proteomic analysis of salt stress-responsive proteins in rice root

Proteomics of rice grain under high temperature stress

Evaluation of rice varieties using proteomic approach

Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of the Rice

Proteomic response of hybrid wild rice to cold stress at the seedling stage

The control of amylose synthesis

Mapping and comparative proteomic analysis of the starch biosynthetic pathway in rice by 2D PAGE/MS

Biochemical and genetic analysis of the effects of amylose-extender mutation in rice endosperm

Systems genetics identifies a novel regulatory domain of amylose synthesis

Introduction of Wx transgene into Rice wx mutants leads to both high-and low-amylose Rice

Homology modeling, functional annotation and comparative genome analysis of GBSS enzyme in rice and maize genomes

Dynamic TMT-Based Quantitative Proteomics Analysis of Critical Initiation Process of Totipotency during Cotton Somatic Embryogenesis Transdifferentiation

Proteomic analysis reveals response of differential wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes to oxygen deficiency stress

Label-free LC-MS/MS proteomics analyses reveal proteomic changes accompanying MSTN KO in C2C12 cells

Identification of differentially expressed proteins in the injured lung from zinc chloride smoke inhalation based on proteomics analysis

Comprehensive metabolomic, proteomic and physiological analyses of grain yield reduction in rice under abrupt drought-flood alternation stress

Quantitative succinyl-proteome profiling of Chinese hickory (Carya cathayensis) during the grafting process

Comparative proteomic analysis of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) seedlings under salt stress

Proteomic profile of human Schwann cells

Genotypic variation in the grain photosynthetic contribution to grain filling in rice

Genome-wide identification of grain filling genes regulated by the OsSMF1 transcription factor in rice

The research on the accumulation of grain starch and change of related enzymes activity in rice with different amylose contents

Studies on the formation and accumulation of amylose content in Rice

Starch: its metabolism, evolution, and biotechnological modification in plants

Role of amylose in the maintenance of the configuration of Rice starch granules

Comparative proteomics analysis of superior and inferior spikelets in hybrid rice during grain filling and response of inferior spikelets to drought stress using isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification

The combination of NAD+-dependent deacetylase gene deletion and the interruption of gluconeogenesis causes increased glucose metabolism in budding yeast

Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Methanococcus jannaschii: characterization of the first archaeal member of the phosphoglucose isomerase superfamily

Ogawa Ki: the sugar-metabolic enzymes Aldolase and triosephosphate Isomerase are targets of Glutathionylation in Arabidopsis thaliana: detection using Biotinylated glutathione

The Intergenic Interplay between Aldose 1-Epimerase-Like Protein and Pectin Methylesterase in Abiotic and Biotic Stress Control

Biochemistry and genetics of starch synthesis

Atlas of rice grain filling-related metabolism under high temperature: joint analysis of metabolome and transcriptome demonstrated inhibition of starch accumulation and induction of amino acid accumulation

Universal sample preparation method integrating trichloroacetic acid/acetone precipitation with phenol extraction for crop proteomic analysis

New avenues for increasing yield and stability in C3 cereals: exploring ear photosynthesis

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations

The authors thank those who have been at the forefront of the fight against the 2019 novel coronavirus for allowing us to have peace of mind to concentrate on writing this manuscript.

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at https://doi.org/10. 1186/s12864-020-07105-9.Additional file 1: Table S1 . Authors' contributions MH conceived the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. HZ, JC, SS, FC, GC and YZ performed the experiment and collected the data. SFA analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

The authors declare that experiments were carried out in accordance with the Institutional ethics committee of Hunan Agricultural University a [43] nd in accordance with local laws and regulations.

Not applicable.

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.Author details 1